Report honest receipts when handlers err after side effects

Why: F10 - any handler error became a no-side-effect rejected receipt
and an audit-store failure dropped the generated operation ID, losing
the reconciliation handle and inviting unsafe retries.
Evidence: cmdbus tests pass (verify-u7b.json); post-execution-unknown,
audit-failure-keeps-ID and confirmation-idempotency cases added.
Impact: unknown receipts now carry the trusted operation ID via the
U7A constructor; rejected stays ID-free; no auto-replay anywhere.
Refs: feature/agent-stack-audit-remediation-b1 U7B
This commit is contained in:
2026-10-21 16:55:01 +00:00
parent e8d0c9bd2f
commit 4030449f4b
8 changed files with 703 additions and 19 deletions
+173 -14
View File
@@ -26,6 +26,43 @@ type AuditStore interface {
AppendAudit(owner string, env agentcommand.AuditEnvelope) error
}
// OperationRecord 是"已记录操作"的最小对账投影(R7/KTD6)。它回答的是
// “这个 operationID 在本 owner/project 名下到底是什么结果”,而不是重放入口。
// 刻意保持最小:审计信封只存状态与标识,不存理由文本,所以这里没有 Reason——
// 不为不存在的字段留位置。
type OperationRecord struct {
OperationID string
CommandID string
State agentcommand.ResultState
Time time.Time
}
// OperationQuery 是 operationID 的对账查询端口(组合根装配;nil = 不提供)。
//
// 授权口径:owner 与 projectID 都是可信过滤条件,实现必须把它们放进查询谓词
// (SQL 的 owner/project 等值条件),不得由调用方参数扩大可见范围;查不到就
// 返回 not found,不得回退为“未执行”。
//
// 诚实边界:本端口只解析“已经落成记录”的 operation。宿主侧的命令回执记录就是
// 命令审计信封(command_audit 按 owner+project 归属);handler 自己的领域操作表
// (如文档投递 document_render_deliveries)由各自领域查询负责,不经本端口。某些
// 命令根本不持久化 req.OperationID(内置的 builtin.help、runtime.mock、
// models.set、conversation.profile、conversation.create 都是无操作表的即时用例),
// 对它们的 operationID 查询恒为 not found——这类命令只能按领域资源(会话、画像、
// 设置项)对账,不得声称可按 operationID 查询。
type OperationQuery interface {
LookupOperation(owner, projectID, operationID string) (OperationRecord, bool, error)
}
var (
// ErrOperationScope 缺少可信 owner/project/operation 作用域:fail-closed,无作用域即无可见性。
ErrOperationScope = errors.New("cmdbus: operation lookup requires owner, project and operation scope")
// ErrOperationNotRecorded 该作用域内没有此 operation 的记录(未记录 ≠ 未执行)。
ErrOperationNotRecorded = errors.New("cmdbus: no operation record in this owner and project scope")
// ErrOperationQueryUnavailable 组合根未装配对账查询端口。
ErrOperationQueryUnavailable = errors.New("cmdbus: operation query unavailable")
)
// CardPort 确认卡所需卡片能力(cardsvc.Service 实现)。
type CardPort interface {
Create(owner string, card core.ActivityCard, ref string) (core.ActivityCard, error)
@@ -35,6 +72,39 @@ type CardPort interface {
// Handler 宿主执行适配器:同步内置用例返回 payload;异步执行自行返回 accepted 回执。
type Handler func(ctx context.Context, req Request) (any, error)
// ErrNotExecuted 标记"失败确定发生在任何副作用之前"的 handler 错误(F10/U7b)。
// 语义口径:只有带此标记的错误才可归 rejected(确定未执行、无副作用、回执不得
// 携带 operationID);未标记的 handler 错误一律按"已执行随后不确定"归 unknown,
// 并带上本次分发已签发的 trusted operation ID 交由对账收敛。宿主不得据
// "处理方报了错"臆断未执行——那会把已写库的操作诱使成不安全重试。
//
// 进程内插件(pkg/extension.Handler)当前还没有等价的声明位:插件命令的
// handler 错误一律按 unknown 对账,直到扩展面补上对应标记为止。
var ErrNotExecuted = errors.New("cmdbus: not executed")
// NotExecutedError 是带"确定未执行"声明的错误包装。Error() 保留原始文案
// (回执 reason 不因标记而变形),Unwrap/Is 让 errors.Is 同时匹配
// ErrNotExecuted 与被包装的原始错误。
type NotExecutedError struct{ Err error }
func (e *NotExecutedError) Error() string { return e.Err.Error() }
func (e *NotExecutedError) Unwrap() error { return e.Err }
func (e *NotExecutedError) Is(target error) bool {
return target == ErrNotExecuted
}
// NotExecuted 声明该失败确定未执行(校验/权限/确认缺失/领域事务回滚等任何
// 副作用之前的拒绝)。nil 原样返回;重复标记幂等。
func NotExecuted(err error) error {
if err == nil || IsNotExecuted(err) {
return err
}
return &NotExecutedError{Err: err}
}
// IsNotExecuted 报告该错误是否声明了"确定未执行"。
func IsNotExecuted(err error) bool { return errors.Is(err, ErrNotExecuted) }
// CommandTool EXT-14:带 exposeAsTool 声明的命令的工具投影视图(runmgr 消费)。
// Risk 取 low|medium|high(工具权限声明口径);ID 即工具名(命令 id)。
type CommandTool struct {
@@ -171,6 +241,8 @@ type Bus struct {
strictAccountWrites bool
allowImplicitLocal bool
projectWorkPreflight func(context.Context, Request) error
// operationQuery operationID 对账查询端口(nil = 不提供,见 OperationQuery)。
operationQuery OperationQuery
}
func (b *Bus) SetProjectWorkPreflight(fn func(context.Context, Request) error) {
@@ -200,6 +272,33 @@ func (b *Bus) Registry() *agentcommand.Registry { return b.reg }
// SetPendingStore 注入确认挂起态的持久化实现(nil = 仅进程内)。
func (b *Bus) SetPendingStore(st PendingStore) { b.pendingStore = st }
// SetOperationQuery 装配 operationID 对账查询端口(组合根;启动期一次)。
func (b *Bus) SetOperationQuery(q OperationQuery) { b.operationQuery = q }
// LookupOperation 按 owner/project 作用域查一个已记录 operation 的当前状态
// (R7/KTD6)。这是 unknown 回执的对账入口:拿到 operationID 的调用方先查
// 记录,再决定下一步,而不是重发命令。
//
// 三重 fail-closed:作用域任一为空即拒(不猜、不按 owner=“”放行)、未装配端口
// 即拒、查不到即 ErrOperationNotRecorded(不推断“未执行”)。跨 owner 查询由
// 端口的 owner 等值谓词拒绝——本层只把 owner 当可信条件往下传。
func (b *Bus) LookupOperation(owner, projectID, operationID string) (OperationRecord, error) {
if owner == "" || projectID == "" || operationID == "" {
return OperationRecord{}, ErrOperationScope
}
if b.operationQuery == nil {
return OperationRecord{}, ErrOperationQueryUnavailable
}
record, found, err := b.operationQuery.LookupOperation(owner, projectID, operationID)
if err != nil {
return OperationRecord{}, err
}
if !found || record.OperationID == "" {
return OperationRecord{}, ErrOperationNotRecorded
}
return record, nil
}
// SetEffectiveAccountGuard installs the composition-root check at startup.
// Handler Store writes still need their own final transaction fence.
func (b *Bus) SetEffectiveAccountGuard(g EffectiveAccountGuard) { b.accountGuard = g }
@@ -405,10 +504,12 @@ func (b *Bus) Dispatch(ctx context.Context, req Request) Response {
if b.pendingStore != nil {
raw, _ := json.Marshal(req)
if err := b.savePending(card.ID, accountActor(req), string(raw)); err != nil {
return receipt(agentcommand.StateUnknown, "", "confirm pending: "+err.Error())
// 确认卡已创建(副作用已发生),挂起态却没落库:结果不确定,且
// 卡 ID 就是本次受理的操作标识——随 unknown 一并给出,供对账。
return receipt(agentcommand.StateUnknown, card.ID, "confirm pending: "+err.Error())
}
} else if b.strictAccountWrites {
return receipt(agentcommand.StateUnknown, "", "confirm pending: account-checked store required")
return receipt(agentcommand.StateUnknown, card.ID, "confirm pending: account-checked store required")
}
b.pendMu.Lock()
b.pending[card.ID] = pending{req: req, cardID: card.ID}
@@ -425,7 +526,9 @@ func (b *Bus) Dispatch(ctx context.Context, req Request) Response {
}
// The domain handler can persist this trusted ID with its transaction/outbox.
// Entropy, not the clock or caller Params, distinguishes concurrent operations.
// A handler failure still writes only a rejected audit receipt without an ID.
// A handler error keeps the ID only on the "executed then uncertain" path
// (unknown): rejected must never carry one, and unknown without a queryable
// handle would be a dead end for reconciliation.
var opBytes [24]byte
if _, err := rand.Read(opBytes[:]); err != nil {
return receipt(agentcommand.StateUnknown, "", "operation ID unavailable")
@@ -433,11 +536,26 @@ func (b *Bus) Dispatch(ctx context.Context, req Request) Response {
req.OperationID = "op_" + hex.EncodeToString(opBytes[:])
payload, err := h(ctx, req)
if err != nil {
return receipt(agentcommand.StateRejected, "", "rejected: "+err.Error())
if IsNotExecuted(err) {
// handler 声明失败发生在任何副作用之前:确定未执行,可安全归
// rejected(回执契约禁止 rejected 携带 operationID)。
return receipt(agentcommand.StateRejected, "", "rejected: "+err.Error())
}
// handler 已开始执行才报错:宿主无法断言"无副作用"(F10)。按"已执行
// 随后不确定"归 unknown,并带上本次分发已签发的 trusted operation ID,
// 调用方据此按记录对账,而不是盲目重试。本路径不做任何自动重放。
return b.unknownAfterExecution(req, "handler failed after execution began: "+err.Error(), start)
}
return Response{Receipt: b.auditReceipt(req, agentcommand.StateCommitted, req.OperationID, "", start), Payload: payload}
}
// unknownAfterExecution 记录并返回"已执行随后不确定"的回执(F10/U7b):审计
// 信封带 state=unknown 与已签发的 operationID(可查凭证),回执走库内受信
// 构造器 NewUnknownAfterExecution,保证 Validate() 通过且对账句柄不丢。
func (b *Bus) unknownAfterExecution(req Request, reason string, start time.Time) Response {
return Response{Receipt: b.auditReceipt(req, agentcommand.StateUnknown, req.OperationID, reason, start)}
}
// Confirm 确认卡回道:actionID=confirm 执行挂起请求(entrance 归一 card),其余视为取消。
func (b *Bus) Confirm(owner, cardID, actionID string) Response {
return b.ConfirmContext(context.Background(), owner, cardID, actionID)
@@ -456,7 +574,7 @@ func (b *Bus) ConfirmContext(ctx context.Context, owner, cardID, actionID string
p, ok := b.pending[cardID]
b.pendMu.Unlock()
if ok && p.req.Owner != "" && p.req.Owner != owner {
return Response{Receipt: agentcommand.ExecReceipt{CommandID: p.req.ID, State: agentcommand.StateRejected, Reason: "confirm owner mismatch", Time: b.now().UTC()}}
return Response{Receipt: agentcommand.ExecReceipt{CommandID: p.req.ID, State: agentcommand.StateRejected, Reason: "confirm owner mismatch", SideEffects: agentcommand.SideEffectsNone, Time: b.now().UTC()}}
}
if b.pendingStore != nil {
storedOwner, payload, found, err := b.takePending(cardID, owner)
@@ -466,7 +584,7 @@ func (b *Bus) ConfirmContext(ctx context.Context, owner, cardID, actionID string
if found {
var req Request
if storedOwner != owner || json.Unmarshal([]byte(payload), &req) != nil {
return Response{Receipt: agentcommand.ExecReceipt{CommandID: "unknown", State: agentcommand.StateRejected, Reason: "invalid pending confirm", Time: b.now().UTC()}}
return Response{Receipt: agentcommand.ExecReceipt{CommandID: "unknown", State: agentcommand.StateRejected, Reason: "invalid pending confirm", SideEffects: agentcommand.SideEffectsNone, Time: b.now().UTC()}}
}
p = pending{req: req, cardID: cardID}
ok = true
@@ -477,11 +595,11 @@ func (b *Bus) ConfirmContext(ctx context.Context, owner, cardID, actionID string
ok = false
}
if !ok {
return Response{Receipt: agentcommand.ExecReceipt{CommandID: "unknown", State: agentcommand.StateRejected, Reason: "no pending confirm (expired or already resolved)", Time: b.now().UTC()}}
return Response{Receipt: agentcommand.ExecReceipt{CommandID: "unknown", State: agentcommand.StateRejected, Reason: "no pending confirm (expired or already resolved)", SideEffects: agentcommand.SideEffectsNone, Time: b.now().UTC()}}
}
req := p.req
if req.Owner != "" && req.Owner != owner {
return Response{Receipt: agentcommand.ExecReceipt{CommandID: req.ID, State: agentcommand.StateRejected, Reason: "confirm owner mismatch", Time: b.now().UTC()}}
return Response{Receipt: agentcommand.ExecReceipt{CommandID: req.ID, State: agentcommand.StateRejected, Reason: "confirm owner mismatch", SideEffects: agentcommand.SideEffectsNone, Time: b.now().UTC()}}
}
b.pendMu.Lock()
delete(b.pending, cardID)
@@ -497,15 +615,29 @@ func (b *Bus) ConfirmContext(ctx context.Context, owner, cardID, actionID string
}
resp := b.Dispatch(ctx, req)
if b.cards != nil {
if resp.Receipt.State == agentcommand.StateCommitted {
switch resp.Receipt.State {
case agentcommand.StateCommitted:
_, _ = b.setConfirmCardStatus(owner, cardID, core.CardResolved, "ok", "confirmed")
} else {
case agentcommand.StateUnknown:
// 已执行随后不确定:卡片必须落到终态(悬在 action_required 会诱导
// 二次确认,而挂起项已被消费,重放只会得到"已解决"),但不得断言
// 失败——tone 用 warn,note 写明不确定原因与对账用 operationID。
_, _ = b.setConfirmCardStatus(owner, cardID, core.CardFailed, "warn", uncertainNote(resp.Receipt))
default:
_, _ = b.setConfirmCardStatus(owner, cardID, core.CardFailed, "danger", resp.Receipt.Reason)
}
}
return resp
}
// uncertainNote 组成"结果未知"卡片的说明:不确定原因 + 对账句柄。
func uncertainNote(r agentcommand.ExecReceipt) string {
if r.OperationID == "" {
return r.Reason
}
return r.Reason + " (operation " + r.OperationID + ")"
}
func accountActor(req Request) string {
// Plugin and delegated commands use Actor for an audit label such as a
// plugin ID; Owner is the effective account whose state controls effects.
@@ -528,7 +660,7 @@ func (b *Bus) checkEffectiveAccount(ctx context.Context, actor string) error {
func (b *Bus) accountRejected(commandID string, start time.Time) Response {
return Response{Receipt: agentcommand.ExecReceipt{
CommandID: commandID, State: agentcommand.StateRejected,
Reason: "effective account unavailable", Time: start.UTC(),
Reason: "effective account unavailable", SideEffects: agentcommand.SideEffectsNone, Time: start.UTC(),
}}
}
@@ -555,10 +687,37 @@ func (b *Bus) auditReceipt(req Request, state agentcommand.ResultState, op, reas
err = b.audit.AppendAudit(req.Owner, env)
}
if err != nil {
// 审计不可用:结果标记未知,不臆断成功(四态语义)。
return agentcommand.ExecReceipt{CommandID: req.ID, State: agentcommand.StateUnknown, Reason: "audit unavailable: " + err.Error(), Time: b.now().UTC()}
// 审计不可用:结果标记未知,不臆断成功(四态语义)。已经签发过操作标识的
// 路径(committed/accepted/已执行后不确定)连同该标识一并返回——信封丢失
// 不等于操作没发生,调用方仍需按 operationID 对账;确定未执行的路径不带
// 标识(rejected 契约禁止带 ID,unknown 无 ID 时也无需对账)。
return unknownReceipt(req.ID, state, op, "audit unavailable: "+err.Error(), b.now().UTC())
}
return agentcommand.ExecReceipt{CommandID: req.ID, State: state, OperationID: op, Reason: reason, Time: b.now().UTC()}
if state == agentcommand.StateUnknown && op != "" {
// 已执行随后不确定:只有库内受信构造器允许 unknown 携带本流程签发的 ID。
return agentcommand.NewUnknownAfterExecution(req.ID, op, reason, b.now().UTC())
}
return agentcommand.ExecReceipt{CommandID: req.ID, State: state, OperationID: op, Reason: reason,
SideEffects: sideEffectsFor(state), Time: b.now().UTC()}
}
// unknownReceipt 构造"结果未知"回执:已签发过操作标识时走受信构造器携带该标识
// (供对账),否则返回不带标识的 unknown。state=rejected 恒不带标识。
func unknownReceipt(commandID string, state agentcommand.ResultState, op, reason string, at time.Time) agentcommand.ExecReceipt {
if op != "" && state != agentcommand.StateRejected {
return agentcommand.NewUnknownAfterExecution(commandID, op, reason, at)
}
return agentcommand.ExecReceipt{CommandID: commandID, State: agentcommand.StateUnknown, Reason: reason, Time: at}
}
// sideEffectsFor 回执的副作用声明:总线自身发起的 rejected 均为任何副作用之前
// 的拒绝(未知命令/参数校验/项目前置/账号预检/无处理器/确认取消/handler 声明的
// not-executed),故断言 none;committed/accepted 维持今日语义(未声明)。
func sideEffectsFor(state agentcommand.ResultState) agentcommand.SideEffects {
if state == agentcommand.StateRejected {
return agentcommand.SideEffectsNone
}
return agentcommand.SideEffectsUnset
}
func digest(params map[string]any) string {