weichen
4938bd095c
Why: prompts lived inline in Go (profile const, subagent string, squad role one-liners, tool descriptions) - every copy change shipped code, and task guidance like meeting-minutes quality lived permanently in the base prompt whether or not the task was at hand. Evidence: new prompts package tests (library integrity, default assembly, skill triggering incl. attachment gate and command bypass, priority supersession, override chain drift, command match, frontmatter parse); composite make test green; runtime check on a live server (40 modules across 7 layers, override round-trip, /minutes starts a run instead of hitting the command bus). Impact: 40 builtin modules as embed data (5 base + 1 env + 12 task skills + 10 agent roles + 7 tool descriptions + 3 aux templates + 2 styles); migration v8 adds prompt_modules for user overrides with basedOnVersion drift markers; ctxasm assembles multi-segment system messages with per-module observability; subagent/squad/tool copy now resolve from the library with inline fallbacks; skill commands surface in the / menu and route to runs; default profile SystemPrompt empties onto the library base; pins deps/agent-system-core to the contract commit. Refs: feature/prompt-library task card; design guide in Documents.
1.1 KiB
1.1 KiB
id, layer, version, title, description, priority, outputContract, triggers
| id | layer | version | title | description | priority | outputContract | triggers | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| task.code-review | task | 1 | 代码评审 | 对用户提供的代码做结构化评审，按严重度分级 | 60 | 1. 总评（一段话：整体质量与最大风险） 2. 问题清单：每条 = 位置/严重度(高|中|低)/问题/建议改法 3. 值得保留的亮点（如有） 4. 未覆盖范围声明 |
|
用户要求评审代码。执行要求：
- 只评审实际读到的代码；引用问题位置用 文件:行号 或代码片段首行；读不到的部分列入"未覆盖范围"。
- 按严重度分级：高（会导致错误/安全问题/数据丢失）、中（逻辑隐患、可维护性差）、低（风格、命名）。精力放在高、中；低只在明显时提。
- 每个问题给出可执行的建议改法，不只说"不好"。
- 不顺手重构：评审指出问题与改法，是否改由用户决定。
- 安全问题（注入、越权、敏感信息泄露、不安全的依赖使用）发现即列高危。