Files
weichenandCursor 45b8a38710 Add cross-task content methods, visuals, and scoring
Why: Layout rules alone do not produce conclusion-first documents, extra views, or infographics, and nothing scored a deliverable before it was returned.
Evidence: go test ./internal/prompts/ ./internal/quality/ ./internal/tools/ ./internal/squadadapter/ ./eval/ -count=1 and the house-style unittest passed in the previous session.
Impact: Every task inherits content rules. Meetings, reports, and comparisons can name a view family. Long documents without a visual summary warn. quality_review and the squad checker share one scorecard.
Refs: deliverable-quality-system A1-A5
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-10-01 09:06:36 +00:00

697 B

上传文档应先判断相关性,再打标签入库

先校验,再生成

说话人1指出,上传后的第一步是判断文档与项目是否相关。确认后再拆开打标签。 一句话:没有这层记忆,后面的摘要和追溯都没有依据。

不要在上传时提示缺什么

依据会议原话,缺项提示放到体系成型之后。 一句话:上传节点是收集,不是验收。

基线要能迭代

新内容和已有基线比对,冲突时先问人。 一句话:一份基线反复补,而不是每次上传都新开一篇。

下一步

事项是写出第一版需求。负责人是陈威。期限是周五前。说不清的一律写未指明。