Files
Agent-System-Backend/internal/prompts/library/method-timeline.md
T
weichenandCursor 45b8a38710 Add cross-task content methods, visuals, and scoring
Why: Layout rules alone do not produce conclusion-first documents, extra views, or infographics, and nothing scored a deliverable before it was returned.
Evidence: go test ./internal/prompts/ ./internal/quality/ ./internal/tools/ ./internal/squadadapter/ ./eval/ -count=1 and the house-style unittest passed in the previous session.
Impact: Every task inherits content rules. Meetings, reports, and comparisons can name a view family. Long documents without a visual summary warn. quality_review and the squad checker share one scorecard.
Refs: deliverable-quality-system A1-A5
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-10-01 09:06:36 +00:00

996 B

id, layer, version, title, description
id layer version title description
method.timeline aux 1 时间线保留原意 按时间顺序保留发言人和原意,便于回查,不把讨论改写成结论

按时间线组织内容。它负责可回查,不负责下结论。会议记录、访谈、评审过程都适用。

  • 用材料里的时间戳或顺序分节。没有时间戳时按材料顺序,并注明“原文无时间戳”。
  • 保留发言人。原文是“说话人1”就保留,不猜测真名;文末说明称谓来源。
  • 每条尽量用原意,可以删口头禅和重复,不可以改成你的结论或纠正说话人。
  • 同一时段里换了议题就新开一节,节标题写这一段实际在谈的主题,不用“讨论过程”。
  • 数字、专名、否定(“不要”“不是”)必须和原文一致。听不清或互相矛盾的地方照录,并标“原文如此”。
  • 不在这一视图里写建议或决议。需要判断时改用提炼法或洞察法,另成一篇。