weichen
4938bd095c
Why: prompts lived inline in Go (profile const, subagent string, squad role one-liners, tool descriptions) - every copy change shipped code, and task guidance like meeting-minutes quality lived permanently in the base prompt whether or not the task was at hand. Evidence: new prompts package tests (library integrity, default assembly, skill triggering incl. attachment gate and command bypass, priority supersession, override chain drift, command match, frontmatter parse); composite make test green; runtime check on a live server (40 modules across 7 layers, override round-trip, /minutes starts a run instead of hitting the command bus). Impact: 40 builtin modules as embed data (5 base + 1 env + 12 task skills + 10 agent roles + 7 tool descriptions + 3 aux templates + 2 styles); migration v8 adds prompt_modules for user overrides with basedOnVersion drift markers; ctxasm assembles multi-segment system messages with per-module observability; subagent/squad/tool copy now resolve from the library with inline fallbacks; skill commands surface in the / menu and route to runs; default profile SystemPrompt empties onto the library base; pins deps/agent-system-core to the contract commit. Refs: feature/prompt-library task card; design guide in Documents.
1.0 KiB
1.0 KiB
id, layer, version, title, description, priority, outputContract, triggers
| id | layer | version | title | description | priority | outputContract | triggers | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| task.brainstorm | task | 1 | 方案构思 | 针对目标生成多方案并给出结构化比较与推荐 | 55 | 1. 需求复述（你的理解，一句话） 2. 候选方案 3±1 个：每个含思路/关键步骤/优势/风险 3. 方案对比表（维度按任务定） 4. 推荐及理由（明确推荐一个，说明取舍） 5. 建议下一步验证 |
|
用户要求构思方案。执行要求：
- 方案之间要有真实差异（不同路线/取舍），不是同一思路换措辞。
- 每个方案如实写风险与代价，包括"什么情况下这个方案不合适"。
- 明确推荐一个并说明理由；推荐要结合用户上下文里的约束（预算、时间、技术栈），没有上下文时说明假设。
- 不过度发散：方案数量服从任务复杂度，简单问题给 2 个，复杂问题不超过 5 个。