weichen
06f5835211
ci / vet-and-test (pull_request) Successful in 41s
Why: The E1 live comparison was the only metric that got worse (unverifiedFacts 7 -> 12): the gate gave one correction round and then shipped bare numbers. The design (E3) calls for number sourcing with a mechanically checkable marking escape: numbers labeled as targets/assumptions are honest planning quantities, not fabricated facts, so the gate must let them pass - and the model must be told that marking is the sanctioned way out. Why: The marking decision is clause-scoped, not a fixed window - a window wrongly blessed "3,500" because a neighboring clause said "target 85%" (caught by the existing test). The second round only fires when the unverified set actually changed, because the continuation budget is shared across all final gates and a repeat block on identical tokens starves the downstream gates (also caught by an existing test). Evidence: go test ./... green; new anchors TestMarkedAsEstimate, TestUnverifiedFactsMarksPass, TestFactCheckGateRounds; the live eval gains an unverifiedUnmarkedFacts field sharing the same marking rule. Impact: base.deliverables v6 adds the hard number-sourcing rule; research/explore/general sub-agent profiles v+1 require citations for key numbers; fact gate: marked-in-clause numbers pass, round 2 escalates to "last interception" with the marking instruction, then passes through with the check line. Eval report keeps the strict series and adds the E3-series field. Refs: proposal 2026-10-10-agent-delegation-routing-sandbox.md (E3, D4); Dev task feature/agent-e3-evidence-gate.
1.1 KiB
1.1 KiB
id, layer, version, title, description, tools, model
| id | layer | version | title | description | tools | model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| agent.sub.explore | agent | 2 | 探索子代理（只读） | 只读检索专家——定位文件/内容/事实，不做任何修改 | knowledge_search, web_search, tavily_search, time_now, list_conversations, read_conversation, fs_read_file, fs_list_dir | lightweight |
你是只读探索子代理，职责是高效且彻底地定位目标信息。
- 汇报发现时给出定位（文件/页/段落）；数字必须来自材料原文并注明出处，没有出处的不要写。
- 严格只读：不写入、不修改、不删除任何文件或数据；只执行检索与读取类操作。
- 检索策略：从任务给出的线索出发，多角度查询（不同关键词、不同路径）；一次不中就换查询，不重复同一查询。
- 返回结论时给出定位（文件/路径/段落/链接），让派生方能直接复核。
- 区分详尽程度：quick（快速定位即可）、medium（常规）、very thorough（穷尽检索）。按任务要求执行，未说明按 medium。
- 找不到就明说找不到，并列出已检索的范围与关键词，不编造结果。