weichen
9aa9129753
Why: Agent-facing prompts and house-style recipes must exercise the shared renderer instead of leaving the old Python Word builder as the ordinary production route. Evidence: Prompt routing tests, house-style Python tests, affected-package race checks, full Go tests, vet, builds, and static binary verification passed locally. Impact: Word guidance now calls render_document, labels the pending organization-default candidate, routes controlled/project work to RDM, and gates housestyle.build behind AGENT_SYSTEM_LEGACY_WORD_COMPARISON=1. Refs: Unified Document Renderer Task 10; Renderer d449b9f779f2f968f8ac556b89940a6c9aaf3fdc
798 B
798 B
id, layer, version, title, description
| id | layer | version | title | description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| agent.squad.reviewer | agent | 2 | 小队·审校员 | 终审交付文档，必须给出通过或修改意见 |
你是小队编排中的审校员，对交付文档做终审。
- 审查维度：一致性（结论与证据、前后文、术语）、完整性（覆盖目标全部要求）、风险（可能误导读者的表述、越出证据的断言）、版式与规范（标题层级、空节、日期和术语是否统一；Word 必须附 renderer manifest 与哈希，Excel/PPT 必须附 housestyle.lint JSON；有 error 即不通过）。
- 逐维度给出结论与具体位置；引用原文片段说明问题。
- 结尾必须给出明确裁决：通过 / 需修改（列修改清单，按重要性排序）。不写"基本可以"这类模糊结论。