From 38fe861bca82af1b4b551fe41d3dbafbe6b3079d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: weichen <weichen@home.local>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 02:28:23 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Clarify legacy personal settings compatibility

Why: An empty setting scope must not imply shared-project or system authority.

Evidence: Documentation-only clarification of the verified scope contract.

Impact: No runtime change; retain fail-closed shared settings semantics.

Refs: P1, docs/records/2026-10-14-rdm-settings-completion-contract.md
---
 profile.go | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/profile.go b/profile.go
index d96c65f..b7e3249 100644
--- a/profile.go
+++ b/profile.go
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ const (
 )
 
 // SettingScope 声明设置项的写入归属（提案 2026-10-13-rdm-settings-members-duties-perms-increment P2）。
-// 空串 = 默认：user 与 project 层可写（向后兼容既有 schema）。
+// 空串保留旧个人配置兼容，不表示共享项目策略或系统管理资格。
 type SettingScope string
 
 const (