From e89d412821a5565e78319614b21dcbe9ac7facf4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: weichen Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 03:37:51 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 01/13] Record the task card for feature-generative-ui-u1 Why: establish the authorized task workspace and its initial baseline. Evidence: preserved precheck receipt in .task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md; R0=5771d4f1e5b692bce95eb64cc30dc9931079ad12. Impact: task metadata only; the feature workspace starts at 5771d4f1e5b692bce95eb64cc30dc9931079ad12. Refs: .task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md --- .task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md | 128 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 .task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md diff --git a/.task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md b/.task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..0349d895 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +# feature/generative-ui-u1 任务卡 + +任务主记录：；状态：进行中；owner：weichen + +## 基线与授权 + +- 权威仓：ssh://git@git-ssh.u1680832.nyat.app:31411/weichen/Agent-System-Dev.git；目标分支：main；R0（initial_base_sha）= 5771d4f1e5b692bce95eb64cc30dc9931079ad12 +- 工作区：/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-generative-ui-u1（worktree）；分支：feature/generative-ui-u1 + +- 授权与交付终点：<本次允许的动作与终点；未授权事项写明> +- 交付模式：manual（逐阶段人工评审）；明确授权后可记为 authorized-continuous +- 自动推进授权：无；授权范围：无；授权来源：无；授权终点：无；停止条件：无（未授权） +- 当前阶段：需求拆解；当前增量：I1（待定义） +- 流程依据：仓库根目录 policy/delivery.md（归档后仍按仓库根目录定位） + +## 目标与非目标 + +<预期结果、受影响入口/模块/契约；明确不做什么。> + +## 关联方向与规划 + +- 适用状态：待核对（无适用规划时说明原因） +- 主记录路径/版本：待核对（路径按仓库根目录定位，归档后不变；只引用唯一正文） +- 对应里程碑：待核对 + +## 需求分析 + +| ID | 描述 | 项目符合度及依据 | 优先级 | 验收条件 | 依赖 | 结论 | +|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| +| R1 | 待填写 | 待评估 | 待定 | 待定义 | 待确认 | 待评审 | + +## 方案与计划 + +- 方案引用：待填写（含对象版本） +- 实施计划引用：待填写（含增量与需求 ID） +- 测试计划引用：待填写（含需求 ID 与验收条件） + +## 阶段评审 + +| 阶段 | 对象版本 | 结论 | 评审人 | 时间 | 依据 | +|---|---|---|---|---|---| +| 需求拆解 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | +| 需求评估 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | +| 需求表确认 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | +| 方案设计 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | +| 实施计划 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | +| 实施与自检 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | +| 正式测试与验收 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | +| 代码 Review | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | +| 合入 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | +| 合入核验与收口 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | + +## 探索试验与迭代 + +| 增量/试验 | 假设 | 范围 | 判断和停止条件 | 批准依据 | 结果 | 变更影响 | 需重审补测 | +|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| +| 待定义 | — | — | — | 未批准 | NOT_RUN | 待评估 | 待评估 | + +## 同步记录 + +| 节点 | sync_base_sha | tested_head_sha | checked_at | +|---|---|---|---| +| 启动 | 5771d4f1e5b692bce95eb64cc30dc9931079ad12 | 5771d4f1e5b692bce95eb64cc30dc9931079ad12 | 2026-10-11T03:37:51Z | + +## 证据（Evidence） + + +| 时间(UTC) | 命令 | 被测HEAD | exit | 来源 | sha256(16) | +|---|---|---|---|---|---| + +## 结果与验证（完成后填写） + +- 结果： +- 验证：<结论摘要 PASS/FAIL/SKIP/NOT_RUN 逐项；逐条证据由 make evidence 写入上方证据表> +- 影响与剩余项： + +## 规划进展与下一步 + +- 本次推进/剩余：待核对（依据实际成果更新适用方案/规划） +- 首选下一任务：待核对（无适用规划、已完成或受阻时如实说明，不虚构任务） +- 推荐依据：待填写 +- 前置条件/待确认：待核对 +- 预期产物/验收条件：待定义 +- 重复任务核对：待核对（已有/在途任务、PR 与规划记录） +- 启动授权：未授权（建议不自动启动新任务，仍须明确授权） + +## 合入与清理 + +- 合入记录：NOT_RUN（授权依据、PR、合入 SHA、验证来源） +- 清理记录：NOT_RUN（授权依据、写者退出确认、worktree/分支/任务卡处置） + + +```json +{ + "schema": 1, + "source": "SELF", + "timestamp": "2026-10-11T03:36:47.740251+00:00", + "command": "make precheck", + "command_sha256": "8fd03cdee8adbb8562846a1a114cc0623779a8654412cd20aac9b495e7eb0450", + "cwd": "/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev", + "common_dir": "/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev/.git", + "before": { + "head": "5771d4f1e5b692bce95eb64cc30dc9931079ad12", + "branch": "main", + "target_branch": "main", + "target_head": "5771d4f1e5b692bce95eb64cc30dc9931079ad12", + "status": "", + "tracked_diff_sha256": "e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855", + "untracked": {}, + "submodules": " 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 deps/agent-command (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-native (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e deps/agent-squad (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n af199eeaa23c5b39e08b4649f2513d7572dc5274 deps/development-guidelines (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n ea4651b1f870d84ab9b72cfa79363b3432d113b3 modules/backend (v0.3.0-28-gea4651b)\n 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 modules/backend/deps/agent-command (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 modules/backend/deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-native (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e modules/backend/deps/agent-squad (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/backend/deps/agent-system-core (v0.1.0-9-ga253a40)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/core (v0.2.0)\n 3304efee154e218fa223419b624e8cefb4c762e1 modules/documents (remotes/origin/feature/generative-ui-research-1-g3304efe)\n 3ed10e122042a64180fb24a42d9cc6438cd2d2d6 modules/frontend (v0.3.0-4-g3ed10e1)\n 76d6633736a7abb36ac1ecca42fe4e6f120d0558 modules/ui (v0.3.0)\n" + }, + "after": { + "head": "5771d4f1e5b692bce95eb64cc30dc9931079ad12", + "branch": "main", + "target_branch": "main", + "target_head": "5771d4f1e5b692bce95eb64cc30dc9931079ad12", + "status": "", + "tracked_diff_sha256": "e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855", + "untracked": {}, + "submodules": " 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 deps/agent-command (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-native (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e deps/agent-squad (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n af199eeaa23c5b39e08b4649f2513d7572dc5274 deps/development-guidelines (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n ea4651b1f870d84ab9b72cfa79363b3432d113b3 modules/backend (v0.3.0-28-gea4651b)\n 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 modules/backend/deps/agent-command (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 modules/backend/deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-native (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e modules/backend/deps/agent-squad (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/backend/deps/agent-system-core (v0.1.0-9-ga253a40)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/core (v0.2.0)\n 3304efee154e218fa223419b624e8cefb4c762e1 modules/documents (remotes/origin/feature/generative-ui-research-1-g3304efe)\n 3ed10e122042a64180fb24a42d9cc6438cd2d2d6 modules/frontend (v0.3.0-4-g3ed10e1)\n 76d6633736a7abb36ac1ecca42fe4e6f120d0558 modules/ui (v0.3.0)\n" + }, + "after_error": null, + "exit_code": 0, + "output": "make[1]: Entering directory '/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev'\n[repo] branch=main head=5771d4f1e5\n[remote] origin/main=5771d4f1e5 ahead=0 behind=0\n[tree] clean submodules_drift=0 uninit=0\n[worktrees] linked=2\n[recycle] merged un-recycled branches: feature/card-close-20261011-024611Z feature/card-close-20261011-030817Z\n[hooks] core.hooksPath=scripts/hooks（pre-commit/post-merge 实际接线）\n[facts] policy/facts.md 4 条事实均在有效期内\n[required-reading] core/baseline.md, workflows/delivery.md §1, policy/delivery.md\n[R0] 5771d4f1e5（完整：5771d4f1e5b692bce95eb64cc30dc9931079ad12）\n[worktree] before-sync: recursive component checks passed\n[verdict] READY — 保留本次 precheck receipt 后建任务工作区：PRECHECK_RECEIPT=/tmp/task-precheck.json make task-start NAME=feature/your-branch\nmake[1]: Leaving directory '/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev'\n", + "output_sha256": "cb2aff9619b46084afbb21ef920fc3069d0d1da8a83b3911004cb7de8c7f8c1f", + "receipt_sha256": "f67c6ebe58d98e318562d10f06c23ed267ed541098c9a30ad6d38a36d1fd9bd6" +} +``` From d3497ad6f086960505ce4cdafac3415582f52679 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: weichen Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 04:28:22 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 02/13] Record the task card for feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity Why: establish the authorized task workspace and its initial baseline. Evidence: preserved precheck receipt in .task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md; R0=6479eb5c38636e758b7e44a36fdc7ce6883ad1c9. Impact: task metadata only; the feature workspace starts at 6479eb5c38636e758b7e44a36fdc7ce6883ad1c9. Refs: .task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md --- .task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md | 128 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 .task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md diff --git a/.task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md b/.task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..490a6fa1 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +# feature/collab-storage-u3-atomicity 任务卡 + +任务主记录：；状态：进行中；owner：weichen + +## 基线与授权 + +- 权威仓：ssh://git@git-ssh.u1680832.nyat.app:31411/weichen/Agent-System-Dev.git；目标分支：main；R0（initial_base_sha）= 6479eb5c38636e758b7e44a36fdc7ce6883ad1c9 +- 工作区：/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity（worktree）；分支：feature/collab-storage-u3-atomicity + +- 授权与交付终点：<本次允许的动作与终点；未授权事项写明> +- 交付模式：manual（逐阶段人工评审）；明确授权后可记为 authorized-continuous +- 自动推进授权：无；授权范围：无；授权来源：无；授权终点：无；停止条件：无（未授权） +- 当前阶段：需求拆解；当前增量：I1（待定义） +- 流程依据：仓库根目录 policy/delivery.md（归档后仍按仓库根目录定位） + +## 目标与非目标 + +<预期结果、受影响入口/模块/契约；明确不做什么。> + +## 关联方向与规划 + +- 适用状态：待核对（无适用规划时说明原因） +- 主记录路径/版本：待核对（路径按仓库根目录定位，归档后不变；只引用唯一正文） +- 对应里程碑：待核对 + +## 需求分析 + +| ID | 描述 | 项目符合度及依据 | 优先级 | 验收条件 | 依赖 | 结论 | +|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| +| R1 | 待填写 | 待评估 | 待定 | 待定义 | 待确认 | 待评审 | + +## 方案与计划 + +- 方案引用：待填写（含对象版本） +- 实施计划引用：待填写（含增量与需求 ID） +- 测试计划引用：待填写（含需求 ID 与验收条件） + +## 阶段评审 + +| 阶段 | 对象版本 | 结论 | 评审人 | 时间 | 依据 | +|---|---|---|---|---|---| +| 需求拆解 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | +| 需求评估 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | +| 需求表确认 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | +| 方案设计 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | +| 实施计划 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | +| 实施与自检 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | +| 正式测试与验收 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | +| 代码 Review | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | +| 合入 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | +| 合入核验与收口 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | + +## 探索试验与迭代 + +| 增量/试验 | 假设 | 范围 | 判断和停止条件 | 批准依据 | 结果 | 变更影响 | 需重审补测 | +|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| +| 待定义 | — | — | — | 未批准 | NOT_RUN | 待评估 | 待评估 | + +## 同步记录 + +| 节点 | sync_base_sha | tested_head_sha | checked_at | +|---|---|---|---| +| 启动 | 6479eb5c38636e758b7e44a36fdc7ce6883ad1c9 | 6479eb5c38636e758b7e44a36fdc7ce6883ad1c9 | 2026-10-11T04:28:22Z | + +## 证据（Evidence） + + +| 时间(UTC) | 命令 | 被测HEAD | exit | 来源 | sha256(16) | +|---|---|---|---|---|---| + +## 结果与验证（完成后填写） + +- 结果： +- 验证：<结论摘要 PASS/FAIL/SKIP/NOT_RUN 逐项；逐条证据由 make evidence 写入上方证据表> +- 影响与剩余项： + +## 规划进展与下一步 + +- 本次推进/剩余：待核对（依据实际成果更新适用方案/规划） +- 首选下一任务：待核对（无适用规划、已完成或受阻时如实说明，不虚构任务） +- 推荐依据：待填写 +- 前置条件/待确认：待核对 +- 预期产物/验收条件：待定义 +- 重复任务核对：待核对（已有/在途任务、PR 与规划记录） +- 启动授权：未授权（建议不自动启动新任务，仍须明确授权） + +## 合入与清理 + +- 合入记录：NOT_RUN（授权依据、PR、合入 SHA、验证来源） +- 清理记录：NOT_RUN（授权依据、写者退出确认、worktree/分支/任务卡处置） + + +```json +{ + "schema": 1, + "source": "SELF", + "timestamp": "2026-10-11T04:27:24.074352+00:00", + "command": "make precheck", + "command_sha256": "8fd03cdee8adbb8562846a1a114cc0623779a8654412cd20aac9b495e7eb0450", + "cwd": "/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev", + "common_dir": "/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev/.git", + "before": { + "head": "6479eb5c38636e758b7e44a36fdc7ce6883ad1c9", + "branch": "main", + "target_branch": "main", + "target_head": "6479eb5c38636e758b7e44a36fdc7ce6883ad1c9", + "status": "", + "tracked_diff_sha256": "e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855", + "untracked": {}, + "submodules": " 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 deps/agent-command (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-native (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e deps/agent-squad (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n af199eeaa23c5b39e08b4649f2513d7572dc5274 deps/development-guidelines (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n f480c5b5207a183d9f282a57950b6726811bd3f4 modules/backend (v0.3.0-34-gf480c5b)\n 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 modules/backend/deps/agent-command (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 modules/backend/deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-native (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e modules/backend/deps/agent-squad (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/backend/deps/agent-system-core (v0.1.0-9-ga253a40)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/core (v0.2.0)\n 3e2d8c90492c4d232c030a219885871fa5c98a0f modules/documents (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 3ed10e122042a64180fb24a42d9cc6438cd2d2d6 modules/frontend (v0.3.0-4-g3ed10e1)\n 76d6633736a7abb36ac1ecca42fe4e6f120d0558 modules/ui (v0.3.0)\n" + }, + "after": { + "head": "6479eb5c38636e758b7e44a36fdc7ce6883ad1c9", + "branch": "main", + "target_branch": "main", + "target_head": "6479eb5c38636e758b7e44a36fdc7ce6883ad1c9", + "status": "", + "tracked_diff_sha256": "e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855", + "untracked": {}, + "submodules": " 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 deps/agent-command (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-native (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e deps/agent-squad (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n af199eeaa23c5b39e08b4649f2513d7572dc5274 deps/development-guidelines (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n f480c5b5207a183d9f282a57950b6726811bd3f4 modules/backend (v0.3.0-34-gf480c5b)\n 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 modules/backend/deps/agent-command (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 modules/backend/deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-native (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e modules/backend/deps/agent-squad (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/backend/deps/agent-system-core (v0.1.0-9-ga253a40)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/logging-system (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/core (v0.2.0)\n 3e2d8c90492c4d232c030a219885871fa5c98a0f modules/documents (remotes/origin/HEAD)\n 3ed10e122042a64180fb24a42d9cc6438cd2d2d6 modules/frontend (v0.3.0-4-g3ed10e1)\n 76d6633736a7abb36ac1ecca42fe4e6f120d0558 modules/ui (v0.3.0)\n" + }, + "after_error": null, + "exit_code": 0, + "output": "make[1]: Entering directory '/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev'\n[repo] branch=main head=6479eb5c38\n[remote] origin/main=6479eb5c38 ahead=0 behind=0\n[tree] clean submodules_drift=0 uninit=0\n[worktrees] linked=3\n[recycle] merged un-recycled branches: feature/card-close-20261011-024611Z feature/card-close-20261011-030817Z feature/card-close-20261011-041534Z\n[hooks] core.hooksPath=scripts/hooks（pre-commit/post-merge 实际接线）\n[facts] policy/facts.md 4 条事实均在有效期内\n[required-reading] core/baseline.md, workflows/delivery.md §1, policy/delivery.md\n[R0] 6479eb5c38（完整：6479eb5c38636e758b7e44a36fdc7ce6883ad1c9）\n[worktree] before-sync: recursive component checks passed\n[verdict] READY — 保留本次 precheck receipt 后建任务工作区：PRECHECK_RECEIPT=/tmp/task-precheck.json make task-start NAME=feature/your-branch\nmake[1]: Leaving directory '/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev'\n", + "output_sha256": "80579e04b282723db9d62f6b750bd5a2ccd69913b85e9ec8eb040ea033f2efc9", + "receipt_sha256": "ec70d8516a523902ef59309286b34fd0b599ba90c2775b12448faf8e17ff87e7" +} +``` From f3e7e67fb31cd4a7a1f77394eb7650a8230fb490 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: weichen Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 04:38:09 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 03/13] Pin the backend U3 atomicity merge (PR #140) Why: the parent must pin the merged component SHA for the combined build and CI gates. Evidence: backend origin-main merge of #140 fetched and checked out. Impact: gitlink only. Refs: backend PR #140. --- modules/backend | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/modules/backend b/modules/backend index f480c5b5..3def5259 160000 --- a/modules/backend +++ b/modules/backend @@ -1 +1 @@ -Subproject commit f480c5b5207a183d9f282a57950b6726811bd3f4 +Subproject commit 3def5259023806a49ab84f885b7d220333cccde6 From 6f32083df80d59726b5d2904c474f1e10da1b3c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: weichen Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 04:38:52 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 04/13] Record the sync checkpoint Why: bind the task validation checkpoint to the latest integration baseline. Evidence: SELF recursive component checks; sync_base=6479eb5c38636e758b7e44a36fdc7ce6883ad1c9; candidate=f3e7e67fb31cd4a7a1f77394eb7650a8230fb490. Impact: task metadata only. Refs: .task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md --- .task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/.task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md b/.task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md index 490a6fa1..75aaba91 100644 --- a/.task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md +++ b/.task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md @@ -126,3 +126,4 @@ "receipt_sha256": "ec70d8516a523902ef59309286b34fd0b599ba90c2775b12448faf8e17ff87e7" } ``` +| 同步前验收 | 6479eb5c38636e758b7e44a36fdc7ce6883ad1c9 | f3e7e67fb31cd4a7a1f77394eb7650a8230fb490 | 2026-10-11T04:38:52Z | From b680b95f24ba299fc19509e8b6329073ff4ad086 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: weichen Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 04:40:52 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 05/13] Record the U3 slice-1 delivery state and evidence in the task card Why: stage review needs the results, stage verdicts and three evidence segments in the card before the PR. Evidence: make test / test-backend-pg (real services) / make build all exit 0 via the evidence tool. Impact: task metadata only. Refs: backend PR #140. --- .task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md | 134 ++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 127 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/.task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md b/.task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md index 75aaba91..b66d3f09 100644 --- a/.task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md +++ b/.task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ # feature/collab-storage-u3-atomicity 任务卡 -任务主记录：；状态：进行中；owner：weichen +任务主记录：Dev PR 待建（backend 组件 PR #140 已合入）；状态：切片 1 实施完成待评审；owner：weichen ## 基线与授权 - 权威仓：ssh://git@git-ssh.u1680832.nyat.app:31411/weichen/Agent-System-Dev.git；目标分支：main；R0（initial_base_sha）= 6479eb5c38636e758b7e44a36fdc7ce6883ad1c9 - 工作区：/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity（worktree）；分支：feature/collab-storage-u3-atomicity -- 授权与交付终点：<本次允许的动作与终点；未授权事项写明> +- 授权与交付终点：承接 2026-10-11「按方案开始改造」授权链；用户 2026-10-11 指示「继续」= 确认进入方案 §5 U3。本任务交付 U3 切片 1（请求原子性：消息事务收口、卡片版本冲突 409；KTD10 Redis 原子限流+降级；最小持久恢复隔离 recovery hold）。U3 剩余（PG admission 硬预算、KTD13 动作授权矩阵）另列切片 2；正式迁移/现役切换/多实例仍不在授权内。 - 交付模式：manual（逐阶段人工评审）；明确授权后可记为 authorized-continuous - 自动推进授权：无；授权范围：无；授权来源：无；授权终点：无；停止条件：无（未授权） - 当前阶段：需求拆解；当前增量：I1（待定义） @@ -27,7 +27,10 @@ | ID | 描述 | 项目符合度及依据 | 优先级 | 验收条件 | 依赖 | 结论 | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| -| R1 | 待填写 | 待评估 | 待定 | 待定义 | 待确认 | 待评审 | +| R3 | 并发提交不静默覆盖 | 切片 1 已实施：消息 seq 会话锁事务分配；卡片 version（v19）乐观并发，用户态变更 409；card_version_test 并发单胜者 | P0 | 同版本竞争最多一个成功 | U2 | 真库+SQLite 全绿（SELF）；CI GATE 待本 PR | +| R7(部分) | 未知副作用不自动重放 | recovery hold（v20）：续跑 fail-closed 跳过、会话级冻结、幂等解除、admin 列出/解除 | P0 | 重启不自动续跑；解除后恢复 | — | recovery_hold_test 双场景绿 | +| R8(部分) | 限流有界可观察 | Redis Lua 原子窗口；故障降级按实例保守限流 + Degraded 计数 | P0 | Redis 断连不无界放行 | U2 | ratelimit 测试（真 Redis + 降级）绿 | +| — | U3 剩余 | PG admission 硬预算、KTD13 动作授权矩阵、admission_pg_test | P0 | 方案 §5 U3 出口 | 切片 1 合入 | 未实施（切片 2 待确认启动） | ## 方案与计划 @@ -39,12 +42,13 @@ | 阶段 | 对象版本 | 结论 | 评审人 | 时间 | 依据 | |---|---|---|---|---|---| -| 需求拆解 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | +| 需求拆解 | 方案 r1 §3/§5 U3 | 随方案获批（「继续」确认进入 U3） | weichen（用户） | 2026-10-11 | 方案 §5 顺序 | + | 需求评估 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | | 需求表确认 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | | 方案设计 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | | 实施计划 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | -| 实施与自检 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | +| 实施与自检 | backend 3def525902 / Dev 分支 | 完成（SELF：SQLite 全量 + 真库 PG18.6+Redis 全量绿；三段 evidence） | Codex | 2026-10-11 | 证据表 make test / test-backend-pg / make build | | 正式测试与验收 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | | 代码 Review | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | | 合入 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | @@ -70,7 +74,9 @@ ## 结果与验证（完成后填写） -- 结果： +- 结果：U3 切片 1 交付——消息追加在会话咨询锁下单事务分配 seq（重试循环降为兜底）；activity_cards v19 版本列 + SaveCardVersioned/GetCardVersion，cardsvc 用户态（status/pin/action/resolveByRef）乐观并发、冲突经既有 writeStoreErr 映射 409，系统镜像保留盲写（版本仍递增）；recovery_holds v20 + admin GET /api/admin/recovery-holds、POST …/{runId}/release + ResumeInterruptedChildren fail-closed 跳过（run 级与会话级）；Redis 限流单 Lua INCR+PEXPIRE（无孤儿键）+ 故障降级进程内保守限流 + Degraded 观测。 +- 验证：make test、make test-backend-pg（真 PG 18.6 隔离实例 + Redis）、make build 三段 evidence 全 exit=0（SELF）；CI GATE（test+test-pg）待本 PR 首跑。诚实边界：流式 Append 为同 run 顺序行为保留盲写（与用户裁决并发时以版本冲突暴露给下次读）；ReconcileInterrupted 只改状态不重执行故不设跳过；hold 自动写入触发点随 U5 recovering 状态补齐。 +- 影响与剩余项：U3 切片 2（PG admission 硬预算、KTD13 动作授权矩阵、admission_pg_test）与 U4–U7 待逐段确认；隔离实例 collabtest（手工启动，socket /tmp，TCP 8897）随任务收尾清除。 - 验证：<结论摘要 PASS/FAIL/SKIP/NOT_RUN 逐项；逐条证据由 make evidence 写入上方证据表> - 影响与剩余项： @@ -82,7 +88,7 @@ - 前置条件/待确认：待核对 - 预期产物/验收条件：待定义 - 重复任务核对：待核对（已有/在途任务、PR 与规划记录） -- 启动授权：未授权（建议不自动启动新任务，仍须明确授权） +- 启动授权：切片 2 须待本 PR 合入与确认（方案 §5 逐段评审） ## 合入与清理 @@ -127,3 +133,117 @@ } ``` | 同步前验收 | 6479eb5c38636e758b7e44a36fdc7ce6883ad1c9 | f3e7e67fb31cd4a7a1f77394eb7650a8230fb490 | 2026-10-11T04:38:52Z | + + +```json +{ + "schema": 1, + "source": "SELF", + "timestamp": "2026-10-11T04:38:59.012077+00:00", + "command": "make test", + "command_sha256": "22cc66aa7d2624b4eb4d5b61658614cd6c32477b123afbf7dbc7fc3d7d0f3713", + "cwd": "/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity", + "common_dir": "/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev/.git", + "before": { + "head": "6f32083df80d59726b5d2904c474f1e10da1b3c5", + "branch": "feature/collab-storage-u3-atomicity", + "target_branch": "main", + "target_head": "6479eb5c38636e758b7e44a36fdc7ce6883ad1c9", + "status": "", + "tracked_diff_sha256": "e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855", + "untracked": {}, + "submodules": " 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 deps/agent-command (heads/main)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (remotes/origin/feature/delivery-mechanism-5-ged2af3e)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e deps/agent-squad (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n af199eeaa23c5b39e08b4649f2513d7572dc5274 deps/development-guidelines (heads/main)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 3def5259023806a49ab84f885b7d220333cccde6 modules/backend (v0.3.0-36-g3def525)\n 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 modules/backend/deps/agent-command (heads/main)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 modules/backend/deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (remotes/origin/feature/delivery-mechanism-5-ged2af3e)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e modules/backend/deps/agent-squad (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/backend/deps/agent-system-core (v0.3.0)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/core (v0.3.0)\n 3e2d8c90492c4d232c030a219885871fa5c98a0f modules/documents (heads/main)\n 3ed10e122042a64180fb24a42d9cc6438cd2d2d6 modules/frontend (v0.3.0-4-g3ed10e1)\n 76d6633736a7abb36ac1ecca42fe4e6f120d0558 modules/ui (v0.3.0)\n" + }, + "after": { + "head": "6f32083df80d59726b5d2904c474f1e10da1b3c5", + "branch": "feature/collab-storage-u3-atomicity", + "target_branch": "main", + "target_head": "6479eb5c38636e758b7e44a36fdc7ce6883ad1c9", + "status": "", + "tracked_diff_sha256": "e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855", + "untracked": {}, + "submodules": " 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 deps/agent-command (heads/main)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (remotes/origin/feature/delivery-mechanism-5-ged2af3e)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e deps/agent-squad (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n af199eeaa23c5b39e08b4649f2513d7572dc5274 deps/development-guidelines (heads/main)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 3def5259023806a49ab84f885b7d220333cccde6 modules/backend (v0.3.0-36-g3def525)\n 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 modules/backend/deps/agent-command (heads/main)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 modules/backend/deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (remotes/origin/feature/delivery-mechanism-5-ged2af3e)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e modules/backend/deps/agent-squad (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/backend/deps/agent-system-core (v0.3.0)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/core (v0.3.0)\n 3e2d8c90492c4d232c030a219885871fa5c98a0f modules/documents (heads/main)\n 3ed10e122042a64180fb24a42d9cc6438cd2d2d6 modules/frontend (v0.3.0-4-g3ed10e1)\n 76d6633736a7abb36ac1ecca42fe4e6f120d0558 modules/ui (v0.3.0)\n" + }, + "after_error": null, + "exit_code": 0, + "output": "make[1]: Entering directory '/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity'\npython3 scripts/check-worktree.py verify\n[worktree] verify: recursive component checks passed\nPYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 python3 -m unittest discover -s tests -p 'test_*.py' -v\ntest_candidate_cannot_read_checkout_credentials (test_ci_credentials.CheckoutTests.test_candidate_cannot_read_checkout_credentials) ... ok\ntest_candidate_submodule_update_commands_are_rejected (test_ci_credentials.CheckoutTests.test_candidate_submodule_update_commands_are_rejected) ... ok\ntest_credential_destination_confined_to_injected_server (test_ci_credentials.CheckoutTests.test_credential_destination_confined_to_injected_server) ... ok\ntest_external_or_unlisted_urls_are_rejected_before_component_fetch (test_ci_credentials.CheckoutTests.test_external_or_unlisted_urls_are_rejected_before_component_fetch) ... ok\ntest_inherited_template_hook_does_not_execute_with_credentials (test_ci_credentials.CheckoutTests.test_inherited_template_hook_does_not_execute_with_credentials) ... ok\ntest_nested_external_url_is_rejected_before_authenticated_fetch (test_ci_credentials.CheckoutTests.test_nested_external_url_is_rejected_before_authenticated_fetch) ... ok\ntest_recursive_gitlinks_materialize_exact_sha_without_persisting_credentials (test_ci_credentials.CheckoutTests.test_recursive_gitlinks_materialize_exact_sha_without_persisting_credentials) ... ok\ntest_redirects_do_not_forward_credential_or_fetch_unlisted_target (test_ci_credentials.CheckoutTests.test_redirects_do_not_forward_credential_or_fetch_unlisted_target) ... ok\ntest_after_snapshot_failure_keeps_command_exit_and_output (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_after_snapshot_failure_keeps_command_exit_and_output) ... ok\ntest_all_persisted_and_displayed_text_is_sanitized (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_all_persisted_and_displayed_text_is_sanitized) ... ok\ntest_authorization_forms_are_redacted_in_capture_console_and_import (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_authorization_forms_are_redacted_in_capture_console_and_import) ... ok\ntest_authorization_forms_are_redacted_on_direct_card_capture (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_authorization_forms_are_redacted_on_direct_card_capture) ... ok\ntest_before_after_heads_do_not_relabel_changed_command (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_before_after_heads_do_not_relabel_changed_command) ... ok\ntest_capture_does_not_overwrite_an_existing_receipt (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_capture_does_not_overwrite_an_existing_receipt) ... ok\ntest_capture_without_card_and_import_without_rerun (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_capture_without_card_and_import_without_rerun) ... ok\ntest_child_failure_code_is_preserved (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_child_failure_code_is_preserved) ... ok\ntest_command_line_token_arguments_are_redacted (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_command_line_token_arguments_are_redacted) ... ok\ntest_dirty_and_untracked_contents_have_object_digests (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_dirty_and_untracked_contents_have_object_digests) ... ok\ntest_failed_child_exit_survives_receipt_write_failure (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_failed_child_exit_survives_receipt_write_failure) ... ok\ntest_full_output_is_preserved_not_only_tail (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_full_output_is_preserved_not_only_tail) ... ok\ntest_import_missing_card_fails_without_losing_receipt (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_import_missing_card_fails_without_losing_receipt) ... ok\ntest_import_rejects_unredacted_authorization_with_valid_checksums (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_import_rejects_unredacted_authorization_with_valid_checksums) ... ok\ntest_import_retry_is_idempotent (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_import_retry_is_idempotent) ... ok\ntest_invalid_field_types_and_forged_source_are_rejected (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_invalid_field_types_and_forged_source_are_rejected) ... ok\ntest_known_secret_environment_value_is_redacted_without_label (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_known_secret_environment_value_is_redacted_without_label) ... ok\ntest_linked_worktree_import_preserves_source_identity (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_linked_worktree_import_preserves_source_identity) ... ok\ntest_missing_card_does_not_execute (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_missing_card_does_not_execute) ... ok\ntest_missing_required_snapshot_fields_are_rejected (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_missing_required_snapshot_fields_are_rejected) ... ok\ntest_nested_cwd_records_untracked_files_from_repository_root (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_nested_cwd_records_untracked_files_from_repository_root) ... ok\ntest_output_digest_checked_even_if_receipt_digest_recomputed (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_output_digest_checked_even_if_receipt_digest_recomputed) ... ok\ntest_pipeline_failure_is_recorded_and_returned (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_pipeline_failure_is_recorded_and_returned) ... ok\ntest_quoted_credentials_with_spaces_are_fully_redacted (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_quoted_credentials_with_spaces_are_fully_redacted) ... ok\ntest_receipt_write_failure_cannot_claim_success (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_receipt_write_failure_cannot_claim_success) ... ok\ntest_recorder_environment_does_not_leak_into_nested_commands (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_recorder_environment_does_not_leak_into_nested_commands) ... ok\ntest_source_cannot_be_promoted_by_environment (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_source_cannot_be_promoted_by_environment) ... ok\ntest_tamper_is_rejected_before_card_append (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_tamper_is_rejected_before_card_append) ... ok\ntest_unrelated_repo_cannot_import (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_unrelated_repo_cannot_import) ... ok\ntest_validate_precheck_checks_result_and_current_base (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_validate_precheck_checks_result_and_current_base) ... ok\ntest_validate_precheck_rejects_successful_arbitrary_command (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_validate_precheck_rejects_successful_arbitrary_command) ... ok\ntest_ide_lock_in_git_dir_does_not_block_finish (test_task.FinishGuardFixTests.test_ide_lock_in_git_dir_does_not_block_finish) ... ok\ntest_local_default_branch_at_origin_main_does_not_block (test_task.FinishGuardFixTests.test_local_default_branch_at_origin_main_does_not_block)\n克隆默认分支停在 origin/main 顶端（pin 为 feature 顶端时不在其历史内） ... ok\ntest_local_unique_commit_still_preserved (test_task.FinishGuardFixTests.test_local_unique_commit_still_preserved) ... ok\ntest_real_git_lock_still_blocks_finish (test_task.FinishGuardFixTests.test_real_git_lock_still_blocks_finish) ... ok\ntest_remote_tracking_refs_do_not_block_finish (test_task.FinishGuardFixTests.test_remote_tracking_refs_do_not_block_finish) ... ok\ntest_finish_abandon_retains_local_remote_tips_and_reason (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_abandon_retains_local_remote_tips_and_reason) ... ok\ntest_finish_abandon_without_reason_preserves_checkout_and_refs (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_abandon_without_reason_preserves_checkout_and_refs) ... ok\ntest_finish_clean_worktree_has_accurate_remote_result (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_clean_worktree_has_accurate_remote_result) ... ok\ntest_finish_deletes_only_merged_remote_branch (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_deletes_only_merged_remote_branch) ... ok\ntest_finish_preserves_component_commits_off_the_pinned_head (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_preserves_component_commits_off_the_pinned_head) ... ok\ntest_finish_preserves_component_untracked_file (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_preserves_component_untracked_file) ... ok\ntest_finish_preserves_linked_component_worktrees_at_the_pinned_head (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_preserves_linked_component_worktrees_at_the_pinned_head) ... ok\ntest_finish_preserves_linked_nested_component_worktree (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_preserves_linked_nested_component_worktree) ... ok\ntest_finish_preserves_locked_worktree (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_preserves_locked_worktree) ... ok\ntest_finish_preserves_main_and_active_index_lock (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_preserves_main_and_active_index_lock) ... ok\ntest_finish_preserves_modified_untracked_and_ignored_files (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_preserves_modified_untracked_and_ignored_files) ... ok\ntest_finish_preserves_remote_unmerged_tip (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_preserves_remote_unmerged_tip) ... ok\ntest_finish_recycles_clean_submodule_without_shared_config_changes (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_recycles_clean_submodule_without_shared_config_changes) ... ok\ntest_finish_rejects_subdirectory_without_deleting_it (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_rejects_subdirectory_without_deleting_it) ... ok\ntest_finish_remote_deletion_lease_preserves_concurrent_update (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_remote_deletion_lease_preserves_concurrent_update) ... ok\ntest_finish_requires_writer_exit_confirmation (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_requires_writer_exit_confirmation) ... ok\ntest_post_merge_is_silent_outside_main_checkout (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_post_merge_is_silent_outside_main_checkout) ... ok\ntest_post_merge_main_merge_only_reminds_owner (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_post_merge_main_merge_only_reminds_owner) ... ok\ntest_post_merge_main_pull_only_reminds_owner (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_post_merge_main_pull_only_reminds_owner) ... ok\ntest_precheck_feature_behind_requires_sync (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_precheck_feature_behind_requires_sync) ... ok\ntest_precheck_rejects_unreachable_authority (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_precheck_rejects_unreachable_authority) ... ok\ntest_precheck_routes_existing_project_delivery_policy (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_precheck_routes_existing_project_delivery_policy) ... ok\ntest_start_imports_precheck_and_creates_four_part_commit (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_start_imports_precheck_and_creates_four_part_commit) ... ok\ntest_start_offline_does_not_create_worktree (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_start_offline_does_not_create_worktree) ... ok\ntest_start_preserves_merged_local_and_remote_branch_names (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_start_preserves_merged_local_and_remote_branch_names) ... ok\ntest_start_rejects_receipt_when_authoritative_base_changed (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_start_rejects_receipt_when_authoritative_base_changed) ... ok\ntest_start_requires_precheck_receipt_before_creating_worktree (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_start_requires_precheck_receipt_before_creating_worktree) ... ok\ntest_start_stacked_branch_records_parent_and_main_baseline (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_start_stacked_branch_records_parent_and_main_baseline) ... ok\ntest_sync_commit_failure_never_reports_synced (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_commit_failure_never_reports_synced) ... ok\ntest_sync_does_not_execute_json_receipt_command (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_does_not_execute_json_receipt_command) ... ok\ntest_sync_keeps_json_evidence_fresh_after_metadata_only_changes (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_keeps_json_evidence_fresh_after_metadata_only_changes) ... ok\ntest_sync_keeps_unchanged_component_branch (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_keeps_unchanged_component_branch) ... ok\ntest_sync_materializes_nested_detached_components (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_materializes_nested_detached_components) ... ok\ntest_sync_materializes_updated_component (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_materializes_updated_component) ... ok\ntest_sync_preserves_component_feature_branch (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_preserves_component_feature_branch) ... ok\ntest_sync_preserves_dirty_child (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_preserves_dirty_child) ... ok\ntest_sync_preserves_nested_feature_branch_when_parent_pin_changes (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_preserves_nested_feature_branch_when_parent_pin_changes) ... ok\ntest_sync_reads_legacy_commands_with_escaped_pipes (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_reads_legacy_commands_with_escaped_pipes) ... ok\ntest_sync_still_warns_for_stale_legacy_table_evidence (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_still_warns_for_stale_legacy_table_evidence) ... ok\ntest_sync_warns_for_malformed_json_evidence (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_warns_for_malformed_json_evidence) ... ok\ntest_sync_warns_for_missing_json_receipt_fields_even_with_valid_checksum (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_warns_for_missing_json_receipt_fields_even_with_valid_checksum) ... ok\ntest_sync_warns_for_unresolved_json_evidence_head (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_warns_for_unresolved_json_evidence_head) ... ok\ntest_sync_warns_for_unresolved_legacy_evidence_head (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_warns_for_unresolved_legacy_evidence_head) ... ok\ntest_sync_warns_when_json_after_state_contains_uncommitted_code (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_warns_when_json_after_state_contains_uncommitted_code) ... ok\ntest_sync_warns_when_json_before_state_contains_uncommitted_code (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_warns_when_json_before_state_contains_uncommitted_code) ... ok\ntest_sync_warns_when_json_evidence_predates_noncard_changes (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_warns_when_json_evidence_predates_noncard_changes) ... ok\ntest_verify_rejects_recursive_drift_even_when_root_has_local_edits (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_verify_rejects_recursive_drift_even_when_root_has_local_edits) ... ok\ntest_verify_rejects_uninitialized_component (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_verify_rejects_uninitialized_component) ... ok\ntest_deleting_main_symlink_to_outside_is_denied (test_write_guard.WriteGuardTests.test_deleting_main_symlink_to_outside_is_denied) ... ok\ntest_detached_and_bad_branches_are_denied (test_write_guard.WriteGuardTests.test_detached_and_bad_branches_are_denied) ... ok\ntest_every_patch_file_and_move_destination_is_checked (test_write_guard.WriteGuardTests.test_every_patch_file_and_move_destination_is_checked) ... ok\ntest_feature_missing_parent_is_allowed (test_write_guard.WriteGuardTests.test_feature_missing_parent_is_allowed) ... ok\ntest_invalid_json_is_denied (test_write_guard.WriteGuardTests.test_invalid_json_is_denied) ... ok\ntest_missing_parent_on_main_is_denied (test_write_guard.WriteGuardTests.test_missing_parent_on_main_is_denied) ... ok\ntest_missing_unknown_and_malformed_write_input_are_denied (test_write_guard.WriteGuardTests.test_missing_unknown_and_malformed_write_input_are_denied) ... ok\ntest_non_git_destination_is_explicitly_outside_scope (test_write_guard.WriteGuardTests.test_non_git_destination_is_explicitly_outside_scope) ... ok\ntest_nonwrite_tools_are_outside_scope (test_write_guard.WriteGuardTests.test_nonwrite_tools_are_outside_scope) ... ok\ntest_relative_path_uses_hook_cwd_not_process_cwd (test_write_guard.WriteGuardTests.test_relative_path_uses_hook_cwd_not_process_cwd) ... ok\ntest_symlink_into_main_with_missing_parents_is_denied (test_write_guard.WriteGuardTests.test_symlink_into_main_with_missing_parents_is_denied) ... ok\ntest_valid_multi_file_patch_on_feature_is_allowed (test_write_guard.WriteGuardTests.test_valid_multi_file_patch_on_feature_is_allowed) ... ok\n\n----------------------------------------------------------------------\nRan 104 tests in 24.025s\n\nOK\nbash scripts/lint-boundaries.sh\nwarn: architecture edges no longer present; delete them from the baseline\n backend/runmgr backend/cmdbus\narchitecture ok (77 edges)\narchitecture negative ok\nboundaries ok\nbash scripts/check-pins.sh\nok modules/backend agent-command\nok modules/backend agent-intent\nok modules/backend agent-native\nok modules/backend agent-squad\nok modules/backend agent-system-core\nok modules/backend error-code-system\nok modules/backend logging-system\nok deps/agent-native agent-intent\nwarn: deps/agent-native deps/development-guidelines is 26b562d2e34f, Dev is af199eeaa23c\nok deps/agent-native error-code-system\nok deps/agent-native logging-system\nok deps/agent-squad agent-intent\nok deps/agent-squad agent-native\nwarn: deps/agent-squad deps/development-guidelines is 26b562d2e34f, Dev is af199eeaa23c\nok deps/agent-squad error-code-system\nok deps/agent-squad logging-system\nwarn: deps/agent-intent deps/development-guidelines is 26b562d2e34f, Dev is af199eeaa23c\nok deps/agent-intent error-code-system\nok deps/agent-intent logging-system\npins ok\ncd deps/agent-intent && GOWORK=off go vet ./... && GOWORK=off go test -count=1 ./...\nok \tagent-intent/catalogcheck\t0.002s\nok \tagent-intent/cmd/intentctl\t0.002s\nok \tagent-intent/conformance\t0.002s\nok \tagent-intent/examples\t0.002s\nok \tagent-intent/intent\t0.006s\nok \tagent-intent/schema\t0.002s\ncd deps/agent-native && GOWORK=off go vet ./... && GOWORK=off go test -count=1 ./...\nok \tagent-native/adapters/native\t0.197s\nok \tagent-native/adapters/pitransport\t0.032s\nok \tagent-native/catalogcheck\t0.002s\n? \tagent-native/cmd/agent-native\t[no test files]\nok \tagent-native/conformance\t0.052s\nok \tagent-native/exec\t0.154s\nok \tagent-native/rpc\t0.003s\nok \tagent-native/runtime\t1.281s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/agentspec\t0.002s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/checkpoint\t0.002s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/codeorch\t0.072s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/ext\t0.024s\n? \tagent-native/runtime/ext/pkg\t[no test files]\nok \tagent-native/runtime/filestate\t0.022s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/gates\t0.003s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/guardrails\t0.002s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/hooks\t0.002s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/llm\t0.290s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/mcp\t13.267s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/memory\t0.002s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/policy\t0.002s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/promptx\t0.001s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/reminders\t0.002s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/resources\t0.002s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/session\t0.009s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/skills\t0.003s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/subagent\t0.003s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/telemetry\t0.003s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/tools\t11.288s\nok \tagent-native/schema\t0.002s\ncd deps/agent-squad && GOWORK=off go vet ./... && GOWORK=off go test -count=1 ./...\nok \tagent-squad/schema\t0.002s\nok \tagent-squad/squad\t0.977s\nok \tagent-squad/store\t0.003s\nok \tagent-squad/textextract\t0.002s\ncd deps/agent-squad/adapters/intent && GOWORK=off go vet ./... && GOWORK=off go test -count=1 ./...\nok \tagent-squad/adapters/intent\t0.008s\ncd deps/agent-squad/adapters/native && GOWORK=off go vet ./... && GOWORK=off go test -count=1 ./...\nok \tagent-squad/adapters/native\t0.003s\ncd deps/agent-squad/adapters/sqlite && GOWORK=off go vet ./... && GOWORK=off go test -count=1 ./...\nok \tagent-squad/adapters/sqlite\t0.018s\ncd deps/agent-squad/cmd/agent-squad && GOWORK=off go vet ./... && GOWORK=off go test -count=1 ./...\n? \tagent-squad/cmd/agent-squad\t[no test files]\nok \tagent-squad/cmd/agent-squad/cli\t0.003s\nok \tagent-squad/cmd/agent-squad/conformance\t0.005s\nok \tagent-squad/cmd/agent-squad/server\t0.573s\ncd modules/core && go test ./...\nok \tagent-system-core\t0.004s\ncd modules/backend && go test ./...\n? \tagent-system-backend/cmd/agent-system\t[no test files]\nok \tagent-system-backend/eval\t0.003s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/app\t0.070s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/blobstore\t0.002s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/bus\t0.002s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/cardsvc\t(cached)\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/cmdbus\t0.011s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/config\t0.003s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/ctxasm\t0.004s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/docgen\t0.004s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/evalgold\t0.002s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/hostapi\t0.021s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/ingest\t0.474s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/intentgate\t0.002s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/intentsem\t0.002s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/pgbus\t0.003s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/plugins\t0.166s\n? \tagent-system-backend/internal/profiles\t[no test files]\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/prompts\t0.034s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/quality\t0.082s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/rag\t0.085s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/ratelimit\t(cached)\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/route\t0.002s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/runmgr\t(cached)\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/runtime\t1.132s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/server\t5.746s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/settings\t0.011s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/skills\t1.136s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/squadadapter\t0.087s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/store\t0.657s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/tools\t13.174s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/wfcompile\t0.033s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/workflow\t0.002s\nok \tagent-system-backend/pkg/extension\t0.002s\n? \tagent-system-backend/pkg/extension/link\t[no test files]\n? \tagent-system-backend/web\t[no test files]\ncp modules/core/ts/types.ts modules/frontend/src/contracts.ts.tmp\n{ echo \"// 从 Agent-System-Core ts/types.ts 同步（make contracts 生成；Core 为权威）。\"; cat modules/frontend/src/contracts.ts.tmp; } > modules/frontend/src/contracts.ts\nrm modules/frontend/src/contracts.ts.tmp\ncp modules/core/ts/types.ts modules/ui/src/contracts.ts.tmp\n{ echo \"// 从 Agent-System-Core ts/types.ts 同步（make contracts 生成；Core 为权威）。\"; cat modules/ui/src/contracts.ts.tmp; } > modules/ui/src/contracts.ts\nrm modules/ui/src/contracts.ts.tmp\ncd modules/frontend && npm ci --no-fund --no-audit && npx vitest run && node scripts/check-knip.mjs\nnpm warn deprecated uuid@10.0.0: uuid@10 and below is no longer supported. For ESM codebases, update to uuid@latest. For CommonJS codebases, use uuid@11 (but be aware this version will likely be deprecated in 2028).\n\nadded 173 packages in 1s\nnpm warn install-scripts 1 package has install scripts not yet covered by allowScripts:\nnpm warn install-scripts esbuild@0.25.12 (postinstall: node install.js)\nnpm warn install-scripts\nnpm warn install-scripts Run `npm install-scripts ls` to review, or `npm install-scripts approve ` to allow.\n\n RUN v4.1.11 /home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity/modules/frontend\n\n ✓ test/contracts.test.ts (5 tests) 3ms\n(node:4025804) ExperimentalWarning: localStorage is not available because --localstorage-file was not provided.\n(Use `node --trace-warnings ...` to show where the warning was created)\n ✓ test/design-guard.test.ts (6 tests) 8ms\n ✓ test/html-sinks.test.ts (1 test) 4ms\n ✓ test/previewfit.test.ts (4 tests) 4ms\n ✓ test/tasklist.test.ts (6 tests) 6ms\n ✓ test/messageparts.test.ts (11 tests) 7ms\n ✓ test/live.test.ts (19 tests) 6ms\n ✓ test/toolkind.test.ts (5 tests) 5ms\n ✓ test/auth.test.ts (4 tests) 25ms\n ✓ test/preview-empty-state.test.ts (3 tests) 4ms\n ✓ test/previewtabs.test.ts (2 tests) 4ms\n ✓ test/workspaces.test.ts (3 tests) 4ms\n ✓ test/outbox.test.ts (3 tests) 5ms\n ✓ test/scrollsync.test.ts (2 tests) 3ms\n ✓ test/theme.test.ts (3 tests) 3ms\n(node:4025852) ExperimentalWarning: localStorage is not available because --localstorage-file was not provided.\n(Use `node --trace-warnings ...` to show where the warning was created)\n(node:4025853) ExperimentalWarning: localStorage is not available because --localstorage-file was not provided.\n(Use `node --trace-warnings ...` to show where the warning was created)\n ✓ test/send.test.ts (4 tests) 2ms\n ✓ test/notice.test.ts (2 tests) 6ms\n ✓ src/runstate.test.ts (2 tests) 280ms\n\n Test Files 18 passed (18)\n Tests 85 passed (85)\n Start at 04:39:59\n Duration 463ms (transform 971ms, setup 0ms, import 1.52s, tests 379ms, environment 1ms)\n\nknip unused exports 42 <= 43\ncd modules/ui && npm ci --no-fund --no-audit && npx tsc --noEmit && npx vitest run && node scripts/check-knip.mjs\nnpm warn deprecated whatwg-encoding@3.1.1: Use @exodus/bytes instead for a more spec-conformant and faster implementation\n\nadded 162 packages in 569ms\n\n RUN v4.1.11 /home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity/modules/ui\n\n ✓ test/contrast-guard.test.ts (19 tests) 8ms\n ✓ test/html-sinks.test.ts (1 test) 4ms\n ✓ test/design-guard.test.ts (9 tests) 8ms\n ✓ test/safe-html.test.tsx (3 tests) 53ms\nstderr | test/file-preview.test.tsx > OfficePreview 注入槽 > renders via injected loader and surfaces errors\n[preview:docx] 坏.docx Error: bad zip\n at docx (/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity/modules/ui/test/file-preview.test.tsx:69:61)\n at /home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity/modules/ui/src/FilePreview.tsx:169:5\n at Object.react_stack_bottom_frame (/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity/modules/ui/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.development.js:28656:20)\n at runWithFiberInDEV (/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity/modules/ui/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.development.js:1048:13)\n at commitHookEffectListMount (/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity/modules/ui/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.development.js:13748:29)\n at commitHookPassiveMountEffects (/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity/modules/ui/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.development.js:13835:11)\n at commitPassiveMountOnFiber (/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity/modules/ui/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.development.js:16906:13)\n at recursivelyTraversePassiveMountEffects (/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity/modules/ui/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.development.js:16851:13)\n at commitPassiveMountOnFiber (/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity/modules/ui/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.development.js:17183:11)\n at recursivelyTraversePassiveMountEffects (/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity/modules/ui/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.development.js:16851:13)\n\n ✓ test/toolblock.test.tsx (4 tests) 71ms\n ✓ test/collapsible.test.tsx (5 tests) 73ms\n ✓ test/ui.test.tsx (6 tests) 69ms\n ✓ test/tabstrip.test.tsx (3 tests) 88ms\n ✓ test/overlay-host.test.tsx (6 tests) 77ms\n ✓ test/file-preview.test.tsx (9 tests) 95ms\n ✓ test/card-anchor.test.tsx (4 tests) 96ms\n ✓ test/inbox.test.tsx (13 tests) 86ms\n ✓ test/inline-confirm.test.tsx (7 tests) 102ms\n ✓ test/capability.test.tsx (14 tests) 148ms\n\n Test Files 14 passed (14)\n Tests 103 passed (103)\n Start at 04:40:03\n Duration 598ms (transform 421ms, setup 0ms, import 1.29s, tests 979ms, environment 3.13s)\n\nknip unused exports 55 <= 55\ncd deps/agent-command && go vet ./... && go test -count=1 ./...\nok \tagent-command\t0.002s\nok \tagent-command/conformance\t0.002s\nmake[1]: Leaving directory '/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity'\n", + "output_sha256": "c2dea7f7017a26f3326b88401b94abd62e169e3c3e1a5d1198f11f643263b595", + "receipt_sha256": "0b6845ff3b39ee3872fa18c2fcf419c8e4570fa087a16f08b375ae9667314848" +} +``` + + +```json +{ + "schema": 1, + "source": "SELF", + "timestamp": "2026-10-11T04:40:06.148048+00:00", + "command": "env AGENT_PG_TEST_DSN=postgresql://agent:$(grep ^password= | cut -d= -f2-)@127.0.0.1:8897/agent_test AGENT_REDIS_TEST_ADDR=127.0.0.1:6399 make test-backend-pg", + "command_sha256": "bef3ee932485020aaadc1f0baaa0cd5bb4f97bf4340b74929ee2da5c5747d6d4", + "cwd": "/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity", + "common_dir": "/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev/.git", + "before": { + "head": "6f32083df80d59726b5d2904c474f1e10da1b3c5", + "branch": "feature/collab-storage-u3-atomicity", + "target_branch": "main", + "target_head": "6479eb5c38636e758b7e44a36fdc7ce6883ad1c9", + "status": " M .task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md\n", + "tracked_diff_sha256": "18955302fbb3aa77c0461a6aa1ba84a49680516be7d0b014f62aa2eb2e474dd4", + "untracked": {}, + "submodules": " 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 deps/agent-command (heads/main)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (remotes/origin/feature/delivery-mechanism-5-ged2af3e)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e deps/agent-squad (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n af199eeaa23c5b39e08b4649f2513d7572dc5274 deps/development-guidelines (heads/main)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 3def5259023806a49ab84f885b7d220333cccde6 modules/backend (v0.3.0-36-g3def525)\n 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 modules/backend/deps/agent-command (heads/main)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 modules/backend/deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (remotes/origin/feature/delivery-mechanism-5-ged2af3e)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e modules/backend/deps/agent-squad (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/backend/deps/agent-system-core (v0.3.0)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/core (v0.3.0)\n 3e2d8c90492c4d232c030a219885871fa5c98a0f modules/documents (heads/main)\n 3ed10e122042a64180fb24a42d9cc6438cd2d2d6 modules/frontend (v0.3.0-4-g3ed10e1)\n 76d6633736a7abb36ac1ecca42fe4e6f120d0558 modules/ui (v0.3.0)\n" + }, + "after": { + "head": "6f32083df80d59726b5d2904c474f1e10da1b3c5", + "branch": "feature/collab-storage-u3-atomicity", + "target_branch": "main", + "target_head": "6479eb5c38636e758b7e44a36fdc7ce6883ad1c9", + "status": " M .task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md\n", + "tracked_diff_sha256": "18955302fbb3aa77c0461a6aa1ba84a49680516be7d0b014f62aa2eb2e474dd4", + "untracked": {}, + "submodules": " 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 deps/agent-command (heads/main)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (remotes/origin/feature/delivery-mechanism-5-ged2af3e)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e deps/agent-squad (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n af199eeaa23c5b39e08b4649f2513d7572dc5274 deps/development-guidelines (heads/main)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 3def5259023806a49ab84f885b7d220333cccde6 modules/backend (v0.3.0-36-g3def525)\n 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 modules/backend/deps/agent-command (heads/main)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 modules/backend/deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (remotes/origin/feature/delivery-mechanism-5-ged2af3e)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e modules/backend/deps/agent-squad (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/backend/deps/agent-system-core (v0.3.0)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/core (v0.3.0)\n 3e2d8c90492c4d232c030a219885871fa5c98a0f modules/documents (heads/main)\n 3ed10e122042a64180fb24a42d9cc6438cd2d2d6 modules/frontend (v0.3.0-4-g3ed10e1)\n 76d6633736a7abb36ac1ecca42fe4e6f120d0558 modules/ui (v0.3.0)\n" + }, + "after_error": null, + "exit_code": 0, + "output": "make[1]: Entering directory '/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity'\ncd modules/backend && go test -count=1 ./...\n? \tagent-system-backend/cmd/agent-system\t[no test files]\nok \tagent-system-backend/eval\t0.003s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/app\t0.122s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/blobstore\t0.003s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/bus\t0.002s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/cardsvc\t0.065s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/cmdbus\t0.013s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/config\t0.003s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/ctxasm\t0.004s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/docgen\t0.005s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/evalgold\t0.002s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/hostapi\t0.021s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/ingest\t0.525s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/intentgate\t0.003s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/intentsem\t0.002s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/pgbus\t2.082s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/plugins\t0.178s\n? \tagent-system-backend/internal/profiles\t[no test files]\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/prompts\t0.035s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/quality\t0.096s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/rag\t0.095s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/ratelimit\t0.605s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/route\t0.002s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/runmgr\t0.874s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/runtime\t1.201s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/server\t5.742s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/settings\t0.012s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/skills\t1.181s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/squadadapter\t0.086s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/store\t1.974s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/tools\t13.171s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/wfcompile\t0.034s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/workflow\t0.002s\nok \tagent-system-backend/pkg/extension\t0.002s\n? \tagent-system-backend/pkg/extension/link\t[no test files]\n? \tagent-system-backend/web\t[no test files]\nmake[1]: Leaving directory '/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity'\n", + "output_sha256": "df011fe4d12aab1ce95fdda40a0f6a1f625f85b318b9d4481389ff0fb8fe7471", + "receipt_sha256": "bdffc5ba7fe426f32d94b7cbb49edd61ecf8525d4046861815536cd205c2bc85" +} +``` + + +```json +{ + "schema": 1, + "source": "SELF", + "timestamp": "2026-10-11T04:40:21.779730+00:00", + "command": "make build", + "command_sha256": "d1121e35fa7adab170fe1ee4b6226e4bd5059535e24dc4767f1bf2b62d957399", + "cwd": "/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity", + "common_dir": "/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev/.git", + "before": { + "head": "6f32083df80d59726b5d2904c474f1e10da1b3c5", + "branch": "feature/collab-storage-u3-atomicity", + "target_branch": "main", + "target_head": "6479eb5c38636e758b7e44a36fdc7ce6883ad1c9", + "status": " M .task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md\n", + "tracked_diff_sha256": "96abfc02af4ade85f0dbd2e936b3ca18c9e6e85ff64f39fbec02db5bc195b726", + "untracked": {}, + "submodules": " 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 deps/agent-command (heads/main)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (remotes/origin/feature/delivery-mechanism-5-ged2af3e)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e deps/agent-squad (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n af199eeaa23c5b39e08b4649f2513d7572dc5274 deps/development-guidelines (heads/main)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 3def5259023806a49ab84f885b7d220333cccde6 modules/backend (v0.3.0-36-g3def525)\n 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 modules/backend/deps/agent-command (heads/main)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 modules/backend/deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (remotes/origin/feature/delivery-mechanism-5-ged2af3e)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e modules/backend/deps/agent-squad (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/backend/deps/agent-system-core (v0.3.0)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/core (v0.3.0)\n 3e2d8c90492c4d232c030a219885871fa5c98a0f modules/documents (heads/main)\n 3ed10e122042a64180fb24a42d9cc6438cd2d2d6 modules/frontend (v0.3.0-4-g3ed10e1)\n 76d6633736a7abb36ac1ecca42fe4e6f120d0558 modules/ui (v0.3.0)\n" + }, + "after": { + "head": "6f32083df80d59726b5d2904c474f1e10da1b3c5", + "branch": "feature/collab-storage-u3-atomicity", + "target_branch": "main", + "target_head": "6479eb5c38636e758b7e44a36fdc7ce6883ad1c9", + "status": " M .task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md\n", + "tracked_diff_sha256": "96abfc02af4ade85f0dbd2e936b3ca18c9e6e85ff64f39fbec02db5bc195b726", + "untracked": {}, + "submodules": " 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 deps/agent-command (heads/main)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (remotes/origin/feature/delivery-mechanism-5-ged2af3e)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e deps/agent-squad (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n af199eeaa23c5b39e08b4649f2513d7572dc5274 deps/development-guidelines (heads/main)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 3def5259023806a49ab84f885b7d220333cccde6 modules/backend (v0.3.0-36-g3def525)\n 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 modules/backend/deps/agent-command (heads/main)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 modules/backend/deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (remotes/origin/feature/delivery-mechanism-5-ged2af3e)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e modules/backend/deps/agent-squad (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/backend/deps/agent-system-core (v0.3.0)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/core (v0.3.0)\n 3e2d8c90492c4d232c030a219885871fa5c98a0f modules/documents (heads/main)\n 3ed10e122042a64180fb24a42d9cc6438cd2d2d6 modules/frontend (v0.3.0-4-g3ed10e1)\n 76d6633736a7abb36ac1ecca42fe4e6f120d0558 modules/ui (v0.3.0)\n" + }, + "after_error": null, + "exit_code": 0, + "output": "make[1]: Entering directory '/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity'\npython3 scripts/check-worktree.py verify\n[worktree] verify: recursive component checks passed\ncp modules/core/ts/types.ts modules/frontend/src/contracts.ts.tmp\n{ echo \"// 从 Agent-System-Core ts/types.ts 同步（make contracts 生成；Core 为权威）。\"; cat modules/frontend/src/contracts.ts.tmp; } > modules/frontend/src/contracts.ts\nrm modules/frontend/src/contracts.ts.tmp\ncp modules/core/ts/types.ts modules/ui/src/contracts.ts.tmp\n{ echo \"// 从 Agent-System-Core ts/types.ts 同步（make contracts 生成；Core 为权威）。\"; cat modules/ui/src/contracts.ts.tmp; } > modules/ui/src/contracts.ts\nrm modules/ui/src/contracts.ts.tmp\ncd modules/ui && npm ci --no-fund --no-audit\nnpm warn deprecated whatwg-encoding@3.1.1: Use @exodus/bytes instead for a more spec-conformant and faster implementation\n\nadded 162 packages in 648ms\ncd modules/frontend && npm ci --no-fund --no-audit && npm run build\nnpm warn deprecated uuid@10.0.0: uuid@10 and below is no longer supported. For ESM codebases, update to uuid@latest. For CommonJS codebases, use uuid@11 (but be aware this version will likely be deprecated in 2028).\n\nadded 173 packages in 897ms\nnpm warn install-scripts 1 package has install scripts not yet covered by allowScripts:\nnpm warn install-scripts esbuild@0.25.12 (postinstall: node install.js)\nnpm warn install-scripts\nnpm warn install-scripts Run `npm install-scripts ls` to review, or `npm install-scripts approve ` to allow.\n\n> agent-system-frontend@0.1.0 build\n> tsc -b && vite build\n\nvite v6.4.3 building for production...\ntransforming...\n✓ 1001 modules transformed.\nrendering chunks...\ncomputing gzip size...\ndist/index.html 0.40 kB │ gzip: 0.27 kB\ndist/assets/index-ZdELBsP2.css 73.92 kB │ gzip: 13.06 kB\ndist/assets/jszip.min-BteFFylP.js 0.09 kB │ gzip: 0.10 kB\ndist/assets/docx-preview-D6Q6boko.js 77.39 kB │ gzip: 21.27 kB\ndist/assets/jszip.min-BQxX6Wbn.js 97.97 kB │ gzip: 30.39 kB\ndist/assets/index-Nn8f3pmI.js 213.11 kB │ gzip: 70.02 kB\ndist/assets/xlsx-CkFp8p6R.js 429.53 kB │ gzip: 143.07 kB\ndist/assets/index-Ckv5bXj_.js 461.96 kB │ gzip: 145.18 kB\ndist/assets/pptx-preview.es-BFWl25rD.js 1,255.20 kB │ gzip: 401.44 kB\n\n(!) Some chunks are larger than 500 kB after minification. Consider:\n- Using dynamic import() to code-split the application\n- Use build.rollupOptions.output.manualChunks to improve chunking: https://rollupjs.org/configuration-options/#output-manualchunks\n- Adjust chunk size limit for this warning via build.chunkSizeWarningLimit.\n✓ built in 4.59s\nrm -rf modules/backend/web/dist && mkdir -p modules/backend/web/dist && cp -r modules/frontend/dist/* modules/backend/web/dist/ && touch modules/backend/web/dist/.gitkeep\ncd modules/backend && CGO_ENABLED=0 go build -trimpath -ldflags \"-s -w -X main.version=v0.3.0-174-g6f32083-dirty+core=a253a40+backend=3def525+frontend=3ed10e1+ui=76d6633+agentcmd=4f583ca+documents=3e2d8c9+native=c348441+squad=490b0b2+intent=343b1e6\" -o ../../bin/agent-system ./cmd/agent-system\nOK: bin/agent-system（版本 v0.3.0-174-g6f32083-dirty+core=a253a40+backend=3def525+frontend=3ed10e1+ui=76d6633+agentcmd=4f583ca+documents=3e2d8c9+native=c348441+squad=490b0b2+intent=343b1e6；随附插件目录 plugins/）\nmake[1]: Leaving directory '/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity'\n", + "output_sha256": "d4c9ac2b83d9fb5e88cdbdfffb176d5818e5cb9d8a2219f1e5b97f0c34929455", + "receipt_sha256": "c801579c3c3d759b1032d5f0c12371eea8498854263c3e796b78e1cbfaa2caed" +} +``` From 8fc7c64595e9b7ba22aa25dd05a0d7914e37a1d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: weichen Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 04:41:06 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 06/13] Fill the task record PR link Why: card and PR description are one document; record the PR link on the branch before merge. Evidence: Dev PR #328 created via Gitea API. Impact: task metadata only. Refs: PR #328. --- .task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/.task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md b/.task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md index b66d3f09..51d72e86 100644 --- a/.task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md +++ b/.task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # feature/collab-storage-u3-atomicity 任务卡 -任务主记录：Dev PR 待建（backend 组件 PR #140 已合入）；状态：切片 1 实施完成待评审；owner：weichen +任务主记录：Dev PR #328 https://git-home.u1680832.nyat.app:30319/weichen/Agent-System-Dev/pulls/328（backend 组件 PR #140 已合入）；状态：切片 1 实施完成待评审；owner：weichen ## 基线与授权 From 1c25d65ae9f8b36b266598bfbab55c094f09a5be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: weichen Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 04:43:03 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 07/13] Record the U1 trial: harness, results, and task-card outcomes Why: The U1 controlled trial finished; its fixtures, validator, runner, per-run results, report, and renderer spike must be reviewable from the task branch, and the task card needs the final PASS/FAIL record. Evidence: results/summary.json + report.md (SELF, MiniMax official channel, CNY 3 of 200 cap); make evidence receipts for precheck, task-sync, and make test follow in this branch. Impact: Task-scoped experiment artifacts only (.task/genui-u1/); no production code changes. Refs: Documents PR #62 (proposal r2); task card feature/generative-ui-u1 --- .task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md | 57 +- .task/genui-u1/README.md | 46 ++ .task/genui-u1/fixtures.json | 805 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ .task/genui-u1/gen_fixtures.py | 157 +++++ .task/genui-u1/harness.py | 272 +++++++++ .task/genui-u1/postprocess.py | 24 + .task/genui-u1/renderer-spike.log | 13 + .task/genui-u1/renderer-spike.md | 51 ++ .task/genui-u1/report.md | 90 +++ .task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-01.json | 30 + .task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-02.json | 30 + .task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-03.json | 27 + .task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-04.json | 30 + .task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-05.json | 27 + .task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-06.json | 30 + .task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-07.json | 27 + .task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-08.json | 27 + .task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-09.json | 27 + .task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-10.json | 30 + .task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-01.json | 28 + .task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-02.json | 30 + .task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-03.json | 30 + .task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-04.json | 30 + .task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-05.json | 30 + .task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-06.json | 30 + .task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-07.json | 27 + .task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-08.json | 30 + .task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-09.json | 28 + .task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-10.json | 30 + .task/genui-u1/results/B/to-01.json | 30 + .task/genui-u1/results/B/to-02.json | 30 + .task/genui-u1/results/B/to-03.json | 30 + .task/genui-u1/results/B/to-04.json | 30 + .task/genui-u1/results/B/to-05.json | 30 + .task/genui-u1/results/B/to-06.json | 27 + .task/genui-u1/results/B/to-07.json | 27 + .task/genui-u1/results/B/to-08.json | 30 + .task/genui-u1/results/B/to-09.json | 27 + .task/genui-u1/results/B/to-10.json | 30 + .task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-01.json | 56 ++ .task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-02.json | 58 ++ .task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-03.json | 56 ++ .task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-07.json | 48 ++ .task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-08.json | 52 ++ .task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-09.json | 48 ++ .task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/ri-01.json | 61 ++ .task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/ri-02.json | 177 ++++++ .task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/ri-03.json | 58 ++ .task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/ri-04.json | 188 ++++++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-01.json | 322 ++++++++++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-02.json | 425 +++++++++++++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-03.json | 532 ++++++++++++++++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-04.json | 51 ++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-05.json | 315 ++++++++++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-06.json | 467 ++++++++++++++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-07.json | 365 +++++++++++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-08.json | 370 ++++++++++++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-09.json | 415 +++++++++++++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-10.json | 476 +++++++++++++++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-01.json | 192 ++++++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-02.json | 60 ++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-03.json | 212 +++++++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-04.json | 369 ++++++++++++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-05.json | 212 +++++++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-06.json | 225 +++++++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-07.json | 212 +++++++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-08.json | 297 +++++++++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-09.json | 189 ++++++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-10.json | 51 ++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/to-01.json | 194 ++++++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/to-02.json | 242 ++++++++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/to-03.json | 261 ++++++++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/to-04.json | 219 +++++++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/to-05.json | 340 +++++++++++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/to-06.json | 73 +++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/to-07.json | 209 +++++++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/to-08.json | 51 ++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/to-09.json | 215 +++++++ .task/genui-u1/results/G/to-10.json | 192 ++++++ .task/genui-u1/results/summary.json | 98 +++ .task/genui-u1/run_trial.py | 156 +++++ .task/genui-u1/score.py | 133 ++++ PROJECT.md | 6 +- modules/documents | 2 +- 84 files changed, 11300 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/README.md create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/fixtures.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/gen_fixtures.py create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/harness.py create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/postprocess.py create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/renderer-spike.log create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/renderer-spike.md create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/report.md create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-01.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-02.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-03.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-04.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-05.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-06.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-07.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-08.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-09.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-10.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-01.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-02.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-03.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-04.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-05.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-06.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-07.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-08.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-09.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-10.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/to-01.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/to-02.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/to-03.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/to-04.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/to-05.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/to-06.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/to-07.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/to-08.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/to-09.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/B/to-10.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-01.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-02.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-03.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-07.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-08.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-09.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/ri-01.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/ri-02.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/ri-03.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/ri-04.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-01.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-02.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-03.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-04.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-05.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-06.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-07.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-08.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-09.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-10.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-01.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-02.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-03.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-04.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-05.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-06.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-07.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-08.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-09.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-10.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/to-01.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/to-02.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/to-03.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/to-04.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/to-05.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/to-06.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/to-07.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/to-08.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/to-09.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/G/to-10.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/results/summary.json create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/run_trial.py create mode 100644 .task/genui-u1/score.py diff --git a/.task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md b/.task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md index 0349d895..7870a944 100644 --- a/.task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md +++ b/.task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md @@ -7,54 +7,49 @@ - 权威仓：ssh://git@git-ssh.u1680832.nyat.app:31411/weichen/Agent-System-Dev.git；目标分支：main；R0（initial_base_sha）= 5771d4f1e5b692bce95eb64cc30dc9931079ad12 - 工作区：/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-generative-ui-u1（worktree）；分支：feature/generative-ui-u1 -- 授权与交付终点：<本次允许的动作与终点；未授权事项写明> +- 授权与交付终点：用户 2026-10-11 指示「开工」，启动 U1 受控价值与选型试验（r1 主记录 U1 节；参数经同日裁定：模型限 MiniMax M3+M2.7-highspeed、材料限合成样本、费用上限 ¥200）。允许：实验目录内搭建与运行、真实模型调用（预算护栏内）、Documents 提交 r2 修订、发布合入与任务闭环。不允许：生产代码改动、替换生产路径、超预算试验、部署。 - 交付模式：manual（逐阶段人工评审）；明确授权后可记为 authorized-continuous - 自动推进授权：无；授权范围：无；授权来源：无；授权终点：无；停止条件：无（未授权） -- 当前阶段：需求拆解；当前增量：I1（待定义） +- 当前阶段：试验实施与自检；当前增量：I1 试验搭建与运行（.task/genui-u1/） - 流程依据：仓库根目录 policy/delivery.md（归档后仍按仓库根目录定位） ## 目标与非目标 -<预期结果、受影响入口/模块/契约；明确不做什么。> +目标：U1 三臂对照（B=Markdown 基线 / G=UINode 生成 / G-hs=轻量档子集）产出可判定指标（规格有效率、R1 结构分化、结构契合、来源覆盖、token 成本），加 json-render/A2UI renderer 选型挑战，输出 A/B 报告与 r2 修订要点。非目标：业务代码改动、生产路径替换、人类可用性对照（NOT_RUN，留人工评审）。 ## 关联方向与规划 -- 适用状态：待核对（无适用规划时说明原因） -- 主记录路径/版本：待核对（路径按仓库根目录定位，归档后不变；只引用唯一正文） -- 对应里程碑：待核对 +- 适用状态：Generative UI 方向 U1 增量（首个实施候选） +- 主记录路径/版本：modules/documents/docs/proposals/2026-10-10-generative-ui-plugin.md r1（U1 节 + 2026-10-11 用户裁定记录） +- 对应里程碑：U1 受控价值与选型试验；后续 U2–U4 视结果决定 ## 需求分析 | ID | 描述 | 项目符合度及依据 | 优先级 | 验收条件 | 依赖 | 结论 | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| -| R1 | 待填写 | 待评估 | 待定 | 待定义 | 待确认 | 待评审 | +| R1 | 同料不同目标结构分化可测 | 符合：夹具含两组同料三目标 | P0 | facts-A/B 组类型多重集分化指标 | 夹具+生成臂 | 本轮纳入 | +| R4 | 生成规格贴合 16 类词汇与硬限制 | 符合：校验器对齐 core/ui.go | P0 | 首次合法 ≥90%、修复后 ≥98%（建议目标） | 生成臂 | 本轮纳入 | +| R10 | 真实模型成本与成功率证据 | 符合：MiniMax 官方通道实测 | P0 | 每任务 token/费用/调用数可复核 | 模型通道 | 本轮纳入 | ## 方案与计划 -- 方案引用：待填写（含对象版本） -- 实施计划引用：待填写（含增量与需求 ID） -- 测试计划引用：待填写（含需求 ID 与验收条件） +- 方案引用：r1 主记录 U1 节；试验协议 .task/genui-u1/README.md +- 实施计划引用：I1 试验搭建运行 → I2 报告与 r2 修订 → 发布闭环；对应 R1/R4/R10 +- 测试计划引用：评分器 score.py 输出 summary.json；人类可用性对照 NOT_RUN ## 阶段评审 | 阶段 | 对象版本 | 结论 | 评审人 | 时间 | 依据 | |---|---|---|---|---|---| -| 需求拆解 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | -| 需求评估 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | -| 需求表确认 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | -| 方案设计 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | -| 实施计划 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | -| 实施与自检 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | -| 正式测试与验收 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | -| 代码 Review | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | -| 合入 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | -| 合入核验与收口 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — | +| 需求拆解 | U1 试验指标集 | 按裁定执行 | weichen（开工指令） | 2026-10-11 | r1 裁定记录 | +| 实施与自检 | .task/genui-u1/（report.md v1） | 完成（SELF；CI 随发布 PR 为 GATE） | — | 2026-10-11 | 三臂+两探针全部执行；首轮 harness 截断缺陷发现→修复→重跑并记录（报告第六节） | ## 探索试验与迭代 | 增量/试验 | 假设 | 范围 | 判断和停止条件 | 批准依据 | 结果 | 变更影响 | 需重审补测 | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| -| 待定义 | — | — | — | 未批准 | NOT_RUN | 待评估 | 待评估 | +| U1-A 三臂生成对照 | 动态组合规格可用且成本可控 | 30 任务×B/G + 10×G-hs；≤60 调用/臂；≤¥200 | r1 U1 判据；超限即停 | 2026-10-11 裁定+开工指令 | 完成：R1 分化 6/6；G 首过 60%/修复后 83%（文本通道下界，工具通道探针消除语法类失败）；成本 ≈¥3.0；highspeed 生成档否决（20%） | 报告+r2 修订 5 条 | 人类可用性对照 NOT_RUN；工具通道全量重验留 U3 | +| U1-B renderer 挑战 | 外部 renderer 显著省维护成本 | json-render 端到端 spike + A2UI 结构评估（/tmp 隔离） | 显著减少总维护成本才采用 | 同上 | 完成：首期不引入（json-render 契约重+运行时重叠；A2UI 需 DOM+客户端绑定冲突） | U2 借 schema 驱动目录 | U5 交互期重评 json-render | ## 同步记录 @@ -70,19 +65,19 @@ ## 结果与验证（完成后填写） -- 结果： -- 验证：<结论摘要 PASS/FAIL/SKIP/NOT_RUN 逐项；逐条证据由 make evidence 写入上方证据表> -- 影响与剩余项： +- 结果：U1 完成——三臂对照 + renderer 挑战 + 两通道探针；主报告 .task/genui-u1/report.md；总开销 ≈¥3.0（上限 ¥200）；无生产代码改动。 +- 验证：R1 分化 PASS（6/6，Jaccard 0.17–0.50）；规格有效率文本通道 60%/83%（低于 90%/98% 目标，归因 JSON 语法类，工具通道探针 PASS 证明可消除）；结构契合 0.66（评分口径保守）；来源覆盖 0.87 PASS；成本 PASS；highspeed 生成档 FAIL（20%）→ r2 否决该用途；renderer 结论：首期自研（PASS 判定成立）。人类可用性对照 NOT_RUN；CI GATE 随发布 PR。 +- 影响与剩余项：r1 升 r2（工具通道硬约束、目录含最小示例与按目标收窄、schema 驱动校验、生成=M3、有效率目标移 U3）；U2 契约细化时采纳；人类对照与工具通道全量重验留 U3。 ## 规划进展与下一步 -- 本次推进/剩余：待核对（依据实际成果更新适用方案/规划） -- 首选下一任务：待核对（无适用规划、已完成或受阻时如实说明，不虚构任务） -- 推荐依据：待填写 -- 前置条件/待确认：待核对 -- 预期产物/验收条件：待定义 -- 重复任务核对：待核对（已有/在途任务、PR 与规划记录） -- 启动授权：未授权（建议不自动启动新任务，仍须明确授权） +- 本次推进/剩余：U1 试验完成并回填 r2；主记录由 r1 升 r2（Documents PR）。 +- 首选下一任务：U2 通用契约、启禁与持久化（依赖 U1 设计评审，本轮即其输入） +- 推荐依据：R1 分化与成本证据支持继续；生成通道定型工具参数；首期自研 renderer。 +- 前置条件/待确认：U2 精确 API/迁移设计随任务启动评审；真实模型任务级前后对照按 policy/delivery.md 在 U3 执行。 +- 预期产物/验收条件：主记录 U2 节（旧消费者可用、关闭态不绕过、并发冲突、故障恢复、SQLite/PG 一致）。 +- 重复任务核对：本卡启动时 precheck 无同名卡；Dev/Documents open PR 于 r1 发布时核查为空，本轮未新增冲突任务。 +- 启动授权：U2 未启动（发布本卡后按用户指令开新任务） ## 合入与清理 diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/README.md b/.task/genui-u1/README.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..27dce316 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +# U1 受控价值与选型试验（原型，任务 feature/generative-ui-u1） + +依据：`modules/documents/docs/proposals/2026-10-10-generative-ui-plugin.md` U1 节； +试验参数经用户 2026-10-11 裁定（模型限 MiniMax M3 + M2.7-highspeed；材料限合成样本； +费用上限 ¥200）。本目录全部为原型实验件，不接入生产路径，不修改业务代码。 + +## 协议 + +- **任务集**：`fixtures.json`（seed 20261011，确定性生成）。30 个固定任务： + research-compare(rc)×10、task-overview(to)×10、requirement-input(ri)×10。 + rc 内两组「同料不同目标」（facts-A/B：compare/risk/order 三目标共享同一材料）用于 R1 结构分化检验。 +- **臂**： + - `B`（基线）：材料+目标 → Markdown 卡片（当前系统 submit_card 形态）。30 任务 ×1 次调用。 + - `G`（生成）：同一材料+目标 + 16 类 UINode 目录与硬限制 → JSON 页面规格； + 校验失败带错误至多重提一次（KTD2 约定）。30 任务 ×（1+≤1 修复）。 + - `G-hs`（轻量档子集）：同 G 协议换 MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed，取前 10 任务对照成本/质量。 +- **模型通道**：`https://api.minimaxi.com/v1`（OpenAI 兼容；与 dev 实例 settings 同源）， + 密钥经环境 `MINIMAX_API_KEY` 注入，不入仓。温度 0.3。 +- **校验器**（`harness.py::validate_spec`）对齐 `modules/core/ui.go` 16 类词汇： + 未知类型/字段、非法 props、重复/非法 nodeId、引用不存在的 sourceId、>200 节点、>8 层、 + >256KiB 均判无效（KTD5 纪律）。 +- **护栏**：单臂调用上限 B=60 / G=60 / G-hs=20；预算 >¥200 即停（`run_trial.py` 每次调用前核算）。 + 成本单价取 E5 任务卡记录（M3 $0.3/$1.2、hs $0.6/$2.4 每 M tokens 入/出，汇率 7.2，不计缓存折扣——保守）。 + +## 运行 + +```bash +export MINIMAX_API_KEY=… # 运行时从 dev 实例 settings 取，不落盘 +python3 gen_fixtures.py # 已生成并提交；重跑逐字节一致 +python3 run_trial.py --arm B +python3 run_trial.py --arm G +python3 run_trial.py --arm G-hs +python3 score.py # → results/summary.json +``` + +断点续跑：`results//.json` 已完成即跳过。原始模型全文只存 `results/` +（合成材料，无真实数据；按 r1 约定评测原始材料不进 Documents）。 + +## 判据（对齐 r1「试点评价方法」可自动化部分） + +- 规格有效率：G 首次合法 ≥90%、修复一次后 ≥98%（r1 建议目标）。 +- R1 结构分化：同料不同目标的类型多重集 Jaccard 与主类型差异。 +- 结构契合：预期节点类型出现比例（按族/目标）。 +- 来源可追溯：specs 引用的 sourceId 覆盖率；幻觉引用（校验前）计数。 +- 成本/延迟：每任务 token（含 cached 口径）与折算费用；B 对照。 +- 人类可用性对照（完成耗时/满意度）不在本轮自动化范围，标注 NOT_RUN，留后续人工评审。 diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/fixtures.json b/.task/genui-u1/fixtures.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..325eeb5c --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/fixtures.json @@ -0,0 +1,805 @@ +{ + "seed": 20261011, + "tasks": [ + { + "id": "rc-01", + "family": "research-compare", + "sharedGroup": "facts-A", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1", + "text": "VaultKeep：权限中枢类工具，2022-08 上线。\n核心能力：RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换。\n报价 ¥15/人/天；部署形态：国密支持。\n近半年发布 7 次，平均修复周期 3 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2", + "text": "LarkPipe：消息管道类工具，2019-03 上线。\n核心能力：Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量。\n报价 ¥5/人/天；部署形态：仅 SaaS。\n近半年发布 2 次，平均修复周期 1 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3", + "text": "NexusGrid：数据表格类工具，2021-11 上线。\n核心能力：虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel。\n报价 ¥12/人/天；部署形态：私有化可选。\n近半年发布 7 次，平均修复周期 4 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo", + "text": "尽调风险备忘（内部）：\n- 供应商锁定（中）：私有 API 占比 40%\n- 培训成本（低）：界面术语与现有系统不一致\n- 升级断层（中）：近两季度仅小版本" + } + ], + "goal": "给决策会准备一页选型对比：突出三者的能力、价格与部署差异，给出你的建议与理由。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "compare", + "table" + ], + "goalKind": "compare" + } + }, + { + "id": "rc-02", + "family": "research-compare", + "sharedGroup": "facts-A", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1", + "text": "VaultKeep：权限中枢类工具，2022-08 上线。\n核心能力：RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换。\n报价 ¥15/人/天；部署形态：国密支持。\n近半年发布 7 次，平均修复周期 3 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2", + "text": "LarkPipe：消息管道类工具，2019-03 上线。\n核心能力：Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量。\n报价 ¥5/人/天；部署形态：仅 SaaS。\n近半年发布 2 次，平均修复周期 1 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3", + "text": "NexusGrid：数据表格类工具，2021-11 上线。\n核心能力：虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel。\n报价 ¥12/人/天；部署形态：私有化可选。\n近半年发布 7 次，平均修复周期 4 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo", + "text": "尽调风险备忘（内部）：\n- 供应商锁定（中）：私有 API 占比 40%\n- 培训成本（低）：界面术语与现有系统不一致\n- 升级断层（中）：近两季度仅小版本" + } + ], + "goal": "给风控评审准备风险分析页：把风险按严重度组织，标注每条风险的来源与你的判断。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "timeline", + "list", + "kv" + ], + "goalKind": "risk" + } + }, + { + "id": "rc-03", + "family": "research-compare", + "sharedGroup": "facts-A", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1", + "text": "VaultKeep：权限中枢类工具，2022-08 上线。\n核心能力：RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换。\n报价 ¥15/人/天；部署形态：国密支持。\n近半年发布 7 次，平均修复周期 3 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2", + "text": "LarkPipe：消息管道类工具，2019-03 上线。\n核心能力：Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量。\n报价 ¥5/人/天；部署形态：仅 SaaS。\n近半年发布 2 次，平均修复周期 1 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3", + "text": "NexusGrid：数据表格类工具，2021-11 上线。\n核心能力：虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel。\n报价 ¥12/人/天；部署形态：私有化可选。\n近半年发布 7 次，平均修复周期 4 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo", + "text": "尽调风险备忘（内部）：\n- 供应商锁定（中）：私有 API 占比 40%\n- 培训成本（低）：界面术语与现有系统不一致\n- 升级断层（中）：近两季度仅小版本" + } + ], + "goal": "规划评审后的实施顺序：分阶段列出步骤、依赖与里程碑。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "steps", + "timeline" + ], + "goalKind": "order" + } + }, + { + "id": "rc-04", + "family": "research-compare", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-04/vendor1", + "text": "NexusGrid：数据表格类工具，2021-11 上线。\n核心能力：虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel。\n报价 ¥12/人/天；部署形态：私有化可选。\n近半年发布 9 次，平均修复周期 5 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-04/vendor2", + "text": "LarkPipe：消息管道类工具，2019-03 上线。\n核心能力：Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量。\n报价 ¥5/人/天；部署形态：仅 SaaS。\n近半年发布 6 次，平均修复周期 1 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-04/vendor3", + "text": "VaultKeep：权限中枢类工具，2022-08 上线。\n核心能力：RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换。\n报价 ¥15/人/天；部署形态：国密支持。\n近半年发布 4 次，平均修复周期 3 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-04/riskmemo", + "text": "尽调风险备忘（内部）：\n- 合规缺口（高）：数据出境条款未覆盖\n- 升级断层（中）：近两季度仅小版本\n- 培训成本（低）：界面术语与现有系统不一致" + } + ], + "goal": "给风控评审准备风险分析页：把风险按严重度组织，标注每条风险的来源与你的判断。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "timeline", + "list", + "kv" + ], + "goalKind": "risk" + } + }, + { + "id": "rc-05", + "family": "research-compare", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-05/vendor1", + "text": "FlowSync：流程编排类工具，2023-05 上线。\n核心能力：拖拽画布、审批链、REST 连接器。\n报价 ¥8/人/天；部署形态：SSO, 审计日志。\n近半年发布 5 次，平均修复周期 3 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-05/vendor2", + "text": "NexusGrid：数据表格类工具，2021-11 上线。\n核心能力：虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel。\n报价 ¥12/人/天；部署形态：私有化可选。\n近半年发布 5 次，平均修复周期 3 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-05/vendor3", + "text": "LarkPipe：消息管道类工具，2019-03 上线。\n核心能力：Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量。\n报价 ¥5/人/天；部署形态：仅 SaaS。\n近半年发布 3 次，平均修复周期 2 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-05/riskmemo", + "text": "尽调风险备忘（内部）：\n- 合规缺口（高）：数据出境条款未覆盖\n- 供应商锁定（中）：私有 API 占比 40%\n- 性能未验证（高）：万行表格场景无官方基准" + } + ], + "goal": "规划评审后的实施顺序：分阶段列出步骤、依赖与里程碑。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "steps", + "timeline" + ], + "goalKind": "order" + } + }, + { + "id": "rc-06", + "family": "research-compare", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-06/vendor1", + "text": "LarkPipe：消息管道类工具，2019-03 上线。\n核心能力：Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量。\n报价 ¥5/人/天；部署形态：仅 SaaS。\n近半年发布 6 次，平均修复周期 3 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-06/vendor2", + "text": "EchoDocs：文档协同类工具，2020-06 上线。\n核心能力：批注、版本链、全文检索。\n报价 ¥9/人/天；部署形态：无离线。\n近半年发布 9 次，平均修复周期 2 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-06/vendor3", + "text": "NexusGrid：数据表格类工具，2021-11 上线。\n核心能力：虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel。\n报价 ¥12/人/天；部署形态：私有化可选。\n近半年发布 5 次，平均修复周期 1 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-06/riskmemo", + "text": "尽调风险备忘（内部）：\n- 供应商锁定（中）：私有 API 占比 40%\n- 性能未验证（高）：万行表格场景无官方基准\n- 培训成本（低）：界面术语与现有系统不一致" + } + ], + "goal": "给决策会准备一页选型对比：突出三者的能力、价格与部署差异，给出你的建议与理由。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "compare", + "table" + ], + "goalKind": "compare" + } + }, + { + "id": "rc-07", + "family": "research-compare", + "sharedGroup": "facts-B", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1", + "text": "LarkPipe：消息管道类工具，2019-03 上线。\n核心能力：Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量。\n报价 ¥5/人/天；部署形态：仅 SaaS。\n近半年发布 7 次，平均修复周期 2 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2", + "text": "VaultKeep：权限中枢类工具，2022-08 上线。\n核心能力：RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换。\n报价 ¥15/人/天；部署形态：国密支持。\n近半年发布 4 次，平均修复周期 4 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3", + "text": "EchoDocs：文档协同类工具，2020-06 上线。\n核心能力：批注、版本链、全文检索。\n报价 ¥9/人/天；部署形态：无离线。\n近半年发布 2 次，平均修复周期 1 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo", + "text": "尽调风险备忘（内部）：\n- 性能未验证（高）：万行表格场景无官方基准\n- 培训成本（低）：界面术语与现有系统不一致\n- 供应商锁定（中）：私有 API 占比 40%" + } + ], + "goal": "给决策会准备一页选型对比：突出三者的能力、价格与部署差异，给出你的建议与理由。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "compare", + "table" + ], + "goalKind": "compare" + } + }, + { + "id": "rc-08", + "family": "research-compare", + "sharedGroup": "facts-B", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1", + "text": "LarkPipe：消息管道类工具，2019-03 上线。\n核心能力：Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量。\n报价 ¥5/人/天；部署形态：仅 SaaS。\n近半年发布 7 次，平均修复周期 2 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2", + "text": "VaultKeep：权限中枢类工具，2022-08 上线。\n核心能力：RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换。\n报价 ¥15/人/天；部署形态：国密支持。\n近半年发布 4 次，平均修复周期 4 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3", + "text": "EchoDocs：文档协同类工具，2020-06 上线。\n核心能力：批注、版本链、全文检索。\n报价 ¥9/人/天；部署形态：无离线。\n近半年发布 2 次，平均修复周期 1 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo", + "text": "尽调风险备忘（内部）：\n- 性能未验证（高）：万行表格场景无官方基准\n- 培训成本（低）：界面术语与现有系统不一致\n- 供应商锁定（中）：私有 API 占比 40%" + } + ], + "goal": "给风控评审准备风险分析页：把风险按严重度组织，标注每条风险的来源与你的判断。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "timeline", + "list", + "kv" + ], + "goalKind": "risk" + } + }, + { + "id": "rc-09", + "family": "research-compare", + "sharedGroup": "facts-B", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1", + "text": "LarkPipe：消息管道类工具，2019-03 上线。\n核心能力：Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量。\n报价 ¥5/人/天；部署形态：仅 SaaS。\n近半年发布 7 次，平均修复周期 2 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2", + "text": "VaultKeep：权限中枢类工具，2022-08 上线。\n核心能力：RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换。\n报价 ¥15/人/天；部署形态：国密支持。\n近半年发布 4 次，平均修复周期 4 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3", + "text": "EchoDocs：文档协同类工具，2020-06 上线。\n核心能力：批注、版本链、全文检索。\n报价 ¥9/人/天；部署形态：无离线。\n近半年发布 2 次，平均修复周期 1 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo", + "text": "尽调风险备忘（内部）：\n- 性能未验证（高）：万行表格场景无官方基准\n- 培训成本（低）：界面术语与现有系统不一致\n- 供应商锁定（中）：私有 API 占比 40%" + } + ], + "goal": "规划评审后的实施顺序：分阶段列出步骤、依赖与里程碑。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "steps", + "timeline" + ], + "goalKind": "order" + } + }, + { + "id": "rc-10", + "family": "research-compare", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-10/vendor1", + "text": "EchoDocs：文档协同类工具，2020-06 上线。\n核心能力：批注、版本链、全文检索。\n报价 ¥9/人/天；部署形态：无离线。\n近半年发布 4 次，平均修复周期 3 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-10/vendor2", + "text": "NexusGrid：数据表格类工具，2021-11 上线。\n核心能力：虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel。\n报价 ¥12/人/天；部署形态：私有化可选。\n近半年发布 6 次，平均修复周期 3 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-10/vendor3", + "text": "VaultKeep：权限中枢类工具，2022-08 上线。\n核心能力：RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换。\n报价 ¥15/人/天；部署形态：国密支持。\n近半年发布 6 次，平均修复周期 5 天。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo", + "text": "尽调风险备忘（内部）：\n- 升级断层（中）：近两季度仅小版本\n- 性能未验证（高）：万行表格场景无官方基准\n- 培训成本（低）：界面术语与现有系统不一致" + } + ], + "goal": "给风控评审准备风险分析页：把风险按严重度组织，标注每条风险的来源与你的判断。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "timeline", + "list", + "kv" + ], + "goalKind": "risk" + } + }, + { + "id": "ri-01", + "family": "requirement-input", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "req:eval/ri-00/context", + "text": "背景：把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套，预算上限 40 万，期望 Q1 上线。\n干系人：财务（审批人）、行政（发起人）、IT（运维）；法务事后复核合同。\n已定：保留移动端入口；审批链最多 5 级；历史数据只读归档。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "req:eval/ri-00/open", + "text": "待决问题清单：\n- 供应商是否要求驻场实施？\n- 并发审批上限：50 还是 200？\n- 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度？\n- 验收标准由谁签署：财务还是行政？" + } + ], + "goal": "把待决问题组织成可填写的表单页，标注必填与选项，方便我一次收集完。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "form" + ], + "goalKind": "collect" + } + }, + { + "id": "ri-02", + "family": "requirement-input", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "req:eval/ri-01/context", + "text": "背景：把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套，预算上限 40 万，期望 Q1 上线。\n干系人：财务（审批人）、行政（发起人）、IT（运维）；法务事后复核合同。\n已定：保留移动端入口；审批链最多 5 级；历史数据只读归档。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "req:eval/ri-01/open", + "text": "待决问题清单：\n- 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度？\n- 并发审批上限：50 还是 200？\n- 归档年限未定：3 年还是 5 年？\n- 供应商是否要求驻场实施？" + } + ], + "goal": "把已定约束与待决事项分开呈现，给我一页能逐项确认的范围页。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "kv", + "compare", + "list" + ], + "goalKind": "confirm" + } + }, + { + "id": "ri-03", + "family": "requirement-input", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "req:eval/ri-02/context", + "text": "背景：把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套，预算上限 40 万，期望 Q1 上线。\n干系人：财务（审批人）、行政（发起人）、IT（运维）；法务事后复核合同。\n已定：保留移动端入口；审批链最多 5 级；历史数据只读归档。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "req:eval/ri-02/open", + "text": "待决问题清单：\n- 验收标准由谁签署：财务还是行政？\n- 并发审批上限：50 还是 200？\n- 供应商是否要求驻场实施？\n- 归档年限未定：3 年还是 5 年？" + } + ], + "goal": "把待决问题组织成可填写的表单页，标注必填与选项，方便我一次收集完。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "form" + ], + "goalKind": "collect" + } + }, + { + "id": "ri-04", + "family": "requirement-input", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "req:eval/ri-03/context", + "text": "背景：把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套，预算上限 40 万，期望 Q1 上线。\n干系人：财务（审批人）、行政（发起人）、IT（运维）；法务事后复核合同。\n已定：保留移动端入口；审批链最多 5 级；历史数据只读归档。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "req:eval/ri-03/open", + "text": "待决问题清单：\n- 是否需要纸质兜底流程？行政坚持，IT 反对。\n- 验收标准由谁签署：财务还是行政？\n- 并发审批上限：50 还是 200？\n- 供应商是否要求驻场实施？" + } + ], + "goal": "把已定约束与待决事项分开呈现，给我一页能逐项确认的范围页。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "kv", + "compare", + "list" + ], + "goalKind": "confirm" + } + }, + { + "id": "ri-05", + "family": "requirement-input", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "req:eval/ri-04/context", + "text": "背景：把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套，预算上限 40 万，期望 Q1 上线。\n干系人：财务（审批人）、行政（发起人）、IT（运维）；法务事后复核合同。\n已定：保留移动端入口；审批链最多 5 级；历史数据只读归档。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "req:eval/ri-04/open", + "text": "待决问题清单：\n- 验收标准由谁签署：财务还是行政？\n- 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度？\n- 并发审批上限：50 还是 200？\n- 供应商是否要求驻场实施？" + } + ], + "goal": "把待决问题组织成可填写的表单页，标注必填与选项，方便我一次收集完。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "form" + ], + "goalKind": "collect" + } + }, + { + "id": "ri-06", + "family": "requirement-input", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "req:eval/ri-05/context", + "text": "背景：把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套，预算上限 40 万，期望 Q1 上线。\n干系人：财务（审批人）、行政（发起人）、IT（运维）；法务事后复核合同。\n已定：保留移动端入口；审批链最多 5 级；历史数据只读归档。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "req:eval/ri-05/open", + "text": "待决问题清单：\n- 是否需要纸质兜底流程？行政坚持，IT 反对。\n- 验收标准由谁签署：财务还是行政？\n- 供应商是否要求驻场实施？\n- 归档年限未定：3 年还是 5 年？" + } + ], + "goal": "把已定约束与待决事项分开呈现，给我一页能逐项确认的范围页。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "kv", + "compare", + "list" + ], + "goalKind": "confirm" + } + }, + { + "id": "ri-07", + "family": "requirement-input", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "req:eval/ri-06/context", + "text": "背景：把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套，预算上限 40 万，期望 Q1 上线。\n干系人：财务（审批人）、行政（发起人）、IT（运维）；法务事后复核合同。\n已定：保留移动端入口；审批链最多 5 级；历史数据只读归档。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "req:eval/ri-06/open", + "text": "待决问题清单：\n- 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度？\n- 验收标准由谁签署：财务还是行政？\n- 供应商是否要求驻场实施？\n- 并发审批上限：50 还是 200？" + } + ], + "goal": "把待决问题组织成可填写的表单页，标注必填与选项，方便我一次收集完。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "form" + ], + "goalKind": "collect" + } + }, + { + "id": "ri-08", + "family": "requirement-input", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "req:eval/ri-07/context", + "text": "背景：把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套，预算上限 40 万，期望 Q1 上线。\n干系人：财务（审批人）、行政（发起人）、IT（运维）；法务事后复核合同。\n已定：保留移动端入口；审批链最多 5 级；历史数据只读归档。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "req:eval/ri-07/open", + "text": "待决问题清单：\n- 并发审批上限：50 还是 200？\n- 验收标准由谁签署：财务还是行政？\n- 是否需要纸质兜底流程？行政坚持，IT 反对。\n- 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度？" + } + ], + "goal": "把已定约束与待决事项分开呈现，给我一页能逐项确认的范围页。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "kv", + "compare", + "list" + ], + "goalKind": "confirm" + } + }, + { + "id": "ri-09", + "family": "requirement-input", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "req:eval/ri-08/context", + "text": "背景：把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套，预算上限 40 万，期望 Q1 上线。\n干系人：财务（审批人）、行政（发起人）、IT（运维）；法务事后复核合同。\n已定：保留移动端入口；审批链最多 5 级；历史数据只读归档。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "req:eval/ri-08/open", + "text": "待决问题清单：\n- 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度？\n- 归档年限未定：3 年还是 5 年？\n- 供应商是否要求驻场实施？\n- 是否需要纸质兜底流程？行政坚持，IT 反对。" + } + ], + "goal": "把待决问题组织成可填写的表单页，标注必填与选项，方便我一次收集完。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "form" + ], + "goalKind": "collect" + } + }, + { + "id": "ri-10", + "family": "requirement-input", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "req:eval/ri-09/context", + "text": "背景：把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套，预算上限 40 万，期望 Q1 上线。\n干系人：财务（审批人）、行政（发起人）、IT（运维）；法务事后复核合同。\n已定：保留移动端入口；审批链最多 5 级；历史数据只读归档。" + }, + { + "sourceId": "req:eval/ri-09/open", + "text": "待决问题清单：\n- 归档年限未定：3 年还是 5 年？\n- 并发审批上限：50 还是 200？\n- 是否需要纸质兜底流程？行政坚持，IT 反对。\n- 供应商是否要求驻场实施？" + } + ], + "goal": "把已定约束与待决事项分开呈现，给我一页能逐项确认的范围页。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "kv", + "compare", + "list" + ], + "goalKind": "confirm" + } + }, + { + "id": "to-01", + "family": "task-overview", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-00/steps", + "text": "任务「交付门禁自动化」步骤：\n- 需求冻结：done\n- 契约定义：done\n- 存储迁移：in_progress\n- 灰度开关：pending\n- 回退演练：pending" + }, + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-00/log", + "text": "最近动态：\n- 10-08 09:12 存储迁移脚本在预发跑通，耗时 14m\n- 10-09 15:40 灰度开关等待安全评审排期\n- 10-10 11:05 回退演练草案提交，缺少数据校验步骤\n- 10-11 10:30 契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订" + }, + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-00/artifacts", + "text": "产物：\n- 需求清单 v3（doc）\n- 迁移脚本 runbook（doc）\n- 评审纪要 10-11（doc）" + } + ], + "goal": "我要快速看这个任务做到哪了、下一步是什么。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "steps", + "progress", + "kv" + ], + "goalKind": "progress" + } + }, + { + "id": "to-02", + "family": "task-overview", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-01/steps", + "text": "任务「交付门禁自动化」步骤：\n- 需求冻结：done\n- 契约定义：done\n- 存储迁移：in_progress\n- 灰度开关：pending\n- 回退演练：pending" + }, + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-01/log", + "text": "最近动态：\n- 10-08 09:12 存储迁移脚本在预发跑通，耗时 14m\n- 10-09 15:40 灰度开关等待安全评审排期\n- 10-10 11:05 回退演练草案提交，缺少数据校验步骤\n- 10-11 10:30 契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订" + }, + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-01/artifacts", + "text": "产物：\n- 需求清单 v3（doc）\n- 迁移脚本 runbook（doc）\n- 评审纪要 10-11（doc）" + } + ], + "goal": "给我风险与欠账视图：哪里卡住了、缺什么、有什么过期项。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "timeline", + "list", + "kv" + ], + "goalKind": "risk" + } + }, + { + "id": "to-03", + "family": "task-overview", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-02/steps", + "text": "任务「交付门禁自动化」步骤：\n- 需求冻结：done\n- 契约定义：done\n- 存储迁移：in_progress\n- 灰度开关：pending\n- 回退演练：pending" + }, + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-02/log", + "text": "最近动态：\n- 10-08 09:12 存储迁移脚本在预发跑通，耗时 14m\n- 10-09 15:40 灰度开关等待安全评审排期\n- 10-10 11:05 回退演练草案提交，缺少数据校验步骤\n- 10-11 10:30 契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订" + }, + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-02/artifacts", + "text": "产物：\n- 需求清单 v3（doc）\n- 迁移脚本 runbook（doc）\n- 评审纪要 10-11（doc）" + } + ], + "goal": "把它整理成交接页：新同事能看懂背景、当前状态和接手事项。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "tabs", + "section", + "markdown" + ], + "goalKind": "handover" + } + }, + { + "id": "to-04", + "family": "task-overview", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-03/steps", + "text": "任务「交付门禁自动化」步骤：\n- 需求冻结：done\n- 契约定义：done\n- 存储迁移：in_progress\n- 灰度开关：pending\n- 回退演练：pending" + }, + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-03/log", + "text": "最近动态：\n- 10-08 09:12 存储迁移脚本在预发跑通，耗时 14m\n- 10-09 15:40 灰度开关等待安全评审排期\n- 10-10 11:05 回退演练草案提交，缺少数据校验步骤\n- 10-11 10:30 契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订" + }, + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-03/artifacts", + "text": "产物：\n- 需求清单 v3（doc）\n- 迁移脚本 runbook（doc）\n- 评审纪要 10-11（doc）" + } + ], + "goal": "我要快速看这个任务做到哪了、下一步是什么。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "steps", + "progress", + "kv" + ], + "goalKind": "progress" + } + }, + { + "id": "to-05", + "family": "task-overview", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-04/steps", + "text": "任务「交付门禁自动化」步骤：\n- 需求冻结：done\n- 契约定义：done\n- 存储迁移：in_progress\n- 灰度开关：pending\n- 回退演练：pending" + }, + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-04/log", + "text": "最近动态：\n- 10-08 09:12 存储迁移脚本在预发跑通，耗时 14m\n- 10-09 15:40 灰度开关等待安全评审排期\n- 10-10 11:05 回退演练草案提交，缺少数据校验步骤\n- 10-11 10:30 契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订" + }, + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-04/artifacts", + "text": "产物：\n- 需求清单 v3（doc）\n- 迁移脚本 runbook（doc）\n- 评审纪要 10-11（doc）" + } + ], + "goal": "给我风险与欠账视图：哪里卡住了、缺什么、有什么过期项。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "timeline", + "list", + "kv" + ], + "goalKind": "risk" + } + }, + { + "id": "to-06", + "family": "task-overview", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-05/steps", + "text": "任务「交付门禁自动化」步骤：\n- 需求冻结：done\n- 契约定义：done\n- 存储迁移：in_progress\n- 灰度开关：pending\n- 回退演练：pending" + }, + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-05/log", + "text": "最近动态：\n- 10-08 09:12 存储迁移脚本在预发跑通，耗时 14m\n- 10-09 15:40 灰度开关等待安全评审排期\n- 10-10 11:05 回退演练草案提交，缺少数据校验步骤\n- 10-11 10:30 契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订" + }, + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-05/artifacts", + "text": "产物：\n- 需求清单 v3（doc）\n- 迁移脚本 runbook（doc）\n- 评审纪要 10-11（doc）" + } + ], + "goal": "把它整理成交接页：新同事能看懂背景、当前状态和接手事项。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "tabs", + "section", + "markdown" + ], + "goalKind": "handover" + } + }, + { + "id": "to-07", + "family": "task-overview", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-06/steps", + "text": "任务「交付门禁自动化」步骤：\n- 需求冻结：done\n- 契约定义：done\n- 存储迁移：in_progress\n- 灰度开关：pending\n- 回退演练：pending" + }, + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-06/log", + "text": "最近动态：\n- 10-08 09:12 存储迁移脚本在预发跑通，耗时 14m\n- 10-09 15:40 灰度开关等待安全评审排期\n- 10-10 11:05 回退演练草案提交，缺少数据校验步骤\n- 10-11 10:30 契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订" + }, + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-06/artifacts", + "text": "产物：\n- 需求清单 v3（doc）\n- 迁移脚本 runbook（doc）\n- 评审纪要 10-11（doc）" + } + ], + "goal": "我要快速看这个任务做到哪了、下一步是什么。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "steps", + "progress", + "kv" + ], + "goalKind": "progress" + } + }, + { + "id": "to-08", + "family": "task-overview", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-07/steps", + "text": "任务「交付门禁自动化」步骤：\n- 需求冻结：done\n- 契约定义：done\n- 存储迁移：in_progress\n- 灰度开关：pending\n- 回退演练：pending" + }, + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-07/log", + "text": "最近动态：\n- 10-08 09:12 存储迁移脚本在预发跑通，耗时 14m\n- 10-09 15:40 灰度开关等待安全评审排期\n- 10-10 11:05 回退演练草案提交，缺少数据校验步骤\n- 10-11 10:30 契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订" + }, + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-07/artifacts", + "text": "产物：\n- 需求清单 v3（doc）\n- 迁移脚本 runbook（doc）\n- 评审纪要 10-11（doc）" + } + ], + "goal": "给我风险与欠账视图：哪里卡住了、缺什么、有什么过期项。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "timeline", + "list", + "kv" + ], + "goalKind": "risk" + } + }, + { + "id": "to-09", + "family": "task-overview", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-08/steps", + "text": "任务「交付门禁自动化」步骤：\n- 需求冻结：done\n- 契约定义：done\n- 存储迁移：in_progress\n- 灰度开关：pending\n- 回退演练：pending" + }, + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-08/log", + "text": "最近动态：\n- 10-08 09:12 存储迁移脚本在预发跑通，耗时 14m\n- 10-09 15:40 灰度开关等待安全评审排期\n- 10-10 11:05 回退演练草案提交，缺少数据校验步骤\n- 10-11 10:30 契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订" + }, + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-08/artifacts", + "text": "产物：\n- 需求清单 v3（doc）\n- 迁移脚本 runbook（doc）\n- 评审纪要 10-11（doc）" + } + ], + "goal": "把它整理成交接页：新同事能看懂背景、当前状态和接手事项。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "tabs", + "section", + "markdown" + ], + "goalKind": "handover" + } + }, + { + "id": "to-10", + "family": "task-overview", + "materials": [ + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-09/steps", + "text": "任务「交付门禁自动化」步骤：\n- 需求冻结：done\n- 契约定义：done\n- 存储迁移：in_progress\n- 灰度开关：pending\n- 回退演练：pending" + }, + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-09/log", + "text": "最近动态：\n- 10-08 09:12 存储迁移脚本在预发跑通，耗时 14m\n- 10-09 15:40 灰度开关等待安全评审排期\n- 10-10 11:05 回退演练草案提交，缺少数据校验步骤\n- 10-11 10:30 契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订" + }, + { + "sourceId": "task:eval/to-09/artifacts", + "text": "产物：\n- 需求清单 v3（doc）\n- 迁移脚本 runbook（doc）\n- 评审纪要 10-11（doc）" + } + ], + "goal": "我要快速看这个任务做到哪了、下一步是什么。", + "expect": { + "nodeTypesAny": [ + "steps", + "progress", + "kv" + ], + "goalKind": "progress" + } + } + ] +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/gen_fixtures.py b/.task/genui-u1/gen_fixtures.py new file mode 100644 index 00000000..66c4f5cd --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/gen_fixtures.py @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env python3 +"""U1 受控试验夹具生成器（原型，仅本任务内使用）。 + +30 个固定任务：research-compare(rc) / task-overview(to) / requirement-input(ri) 各 10。 +材料全部合成，含稳定 sourceId；rc 内两组「同料不同目标」用于 R1 结构分化检验。 +确定性：固定 seed，重复运行输出逐字节一致。 +""" +import json +import random + +R = random.Random(20261011) + +TOOLS = [ + ("FlowSync", "流程编排", ["拖拽画布", "审批链", "REST 连接器"], "¥8/人/天", "SSO, 审计日志", "2023-05"), + ("NexusGrid", "数据表格", ["虚拟滚动", "单元格校验", "导出 Excel"], "¥12/人/天", "私有化可选", "2021-11"), + ("LarkPipe", "消息管道", ["Webhook 路由", "重试策略", "模板变量"], "¥5/人/天", "仅 SaaS", "2019-03"), + ("VaultKeep", "权限中枢", ["RBAC", "临时令牌", "密钥轮换"], "¥15/人/天", "国密支持", "2022-08"), + ("EchoDocs", "文档协同", ["批注", "版本链", "全文检索"], "¥9/人/天", "无离线", "2020-06"), +] +RISKS = [ + ("供应商锁定", "中", "私有 API 占比 40%"), + ("性能未验证", "高", "万行表格场景无官方基准"), + ("升级断层", "中", "近两季度仅小版本"), + ("合规缺口", "高", "数据出境条款未覆盖"), + ("培训成本", "低", "界面术语与现有系统不一致"), +] + +def rc_materials(idx: int, variant: int): + """3 份候选工具档案 + 1 份风险备忘。variant 区分同料组内不同档案组合。""" + picks = R.sample(TOOLS, 3) if variant == 0 else [TOOLS[(idx + k) % len(TOOLS)] for k in range(3)] + mats = [] + for i, (name, cat, feats, price, deploy, since) in enumerate(picks): + lines = [ + f"{name}：{cat}类工具，{since} 上线。", + f"核心能力：{'、'.join(feats)}。", + f"报价 {price}；部署形态：{deploy}。", + f"近半年发布 {R.randint(2, 9)} 次，平均修复周期 {R.randint(1, 5)} 天。", + ] + mats.append({"sourceId": f"doc:eval/rc-{idx:02d}/vendor{i+1}", "text": "\n".join(lines)}) + rk = R.sample(RISKS, 3) + mats.append({ + "sourceId": f"doc:eval/rc-{idx:02d}/riskmemo", + "text": "尽调风险备忘（内部）：\n" + "\n".join(f"- {t}（{g}）：{d}" for t, g, d in rk), + }) + return mats + +RC_GOALS = [ + ("compare", "给决策会准备一页选型对比：突出三者的能力、价格与部署差异，给出你的建议与理由。", ["compare", "table"]), + ("risk", "给风控评审准备风险分析页：把风险按严重度组织，标注每条风险的来源与你的判断。", ["timeline", "list", "kv"]), + ("order", "规划评审后的实施顺序：分阶段列出步骤、依赖与里程碑。", ["steps", "timeline"]), +] + +def build_rc(): + tasks = [] + # 两组同料不同目标（每组 3 任务共享材料），R1 结构分化检验 + for g, base in enumerate([1, 7]): + mats = rc_materials(base, g) + for k, (kind, goal, expect) in enumerate(RC_GOALS): + tasks.append({ + "id": f"rc-{base+k:02d}", "family": "research-compare", + "sharedGroup": f"facts-{chr(65+g)}", "materials": mats, "goal": goal, + "expect": {"nodeTypesAny": expect, "goalKind": kind}, + }) + # 4 个独立任务 + for idx in [4, 5, 6, 10]: + kind, goal, expect = RC_GOALS[idx % 3] + tasks.append({ + "id": f"rc-{idx:02d}", "family": "research-compare", + "materials": rc_materials(idx, idx % 2), "goal": goal, + "expect": {"nodeTypesAny": expect, "goalKind": kind}, + }) + return tasks + +def to_materials(idx: int): + steps = [ + ("需求冻结", "done"), ("契约定义", "done"), ("存储迁移", "in_progress"), + ("灰度开关", "pending"), ("回退演练", "pending"), + ] + logs = [ + ("10-08 09:12", "存储迁移脚本在预发跑通，耗时 14m"), + ("10-09 15:40", "灰度开关等待安全评审排期"), + ("10-10 11:05", "回退演练草案提交，缺少数据校验步骤"), + ("10-11 10:30", "契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订"), + ] + arts = [("需求清单 v3", "doc"), ("迁移脚本 runbook", "doc"), ("评审纪要 10-11", "doc")] + return [ + {"sourceId": f"task:eval/to-{idx:02d}/steps", "text": "任务「交付门禁自动化」步骤：\n" + "\n".join(f"- {s}：{st}" for s, st in steps)}, + {"sourceId": f"task:eval/to-{idx:02d}/log", "text": "最近动态：\n" + "\n".join(f"- {t} {m}" for t, m in logs)}, + {"sourceId": f"task:eval/to-{idx:02d}/artifacts", "text": "产物：\n" + "\n".join(f"- {n}（{k}）" for n, k in arts)}, + ] + +TO_GOALS = [ + ("progress", "我要快速看这个任务做到哪了、下一步是什么。", ["steps", "progress", "kv"]), + ("risk", "给我风险与欠账视图：哪里卡住了、缺什么、有什么过期项。", ["timeline", "list", "kv"]), + ("handover", "把它整理成交接页：新同事能看懂背景、当前状态和接手事项。", ["tabs", "section", "markdown"]), +] + +def build_to(): + tasks = [] + for idx in range(10): + kind, goal, expect = TO_GOALS[idx % 3] + tasks.append({ + "id": f"to-{idx+1:02d}", "family": "task-overview", + "materials": to_materials(idx), "goal": goal, + "expect": {"nodeTypesAny": expect, "goalKind": kind}, + }) + return tasks + +def ri_materials(idx: int): + ctx = [ + ("背景", "把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套，预算上限 40 万，期望 Q1 上线。"), + ("干系人", "财务（审批人）、行政（发起人）、IT（运维）；法务事后复核合同。"), + ("已定", "保留移动端入口；审批链最多 5 级；历史数据只读归档。"), + ] + opens = [ + "归档年限未定：3 年还是 5 年？", + "是否需要纸质兜底流程？行政坚持，IT 反对。", + "并发审批上限：50 还是 200？", + "供应商是否要求驻场实施？", + "验收标准由谁签署：财务还是行政？", + "旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度？", + ] + picked = R.sample(opens, 4) + return [ + {"sourceId": f"req:eval/ri-{idx:02d}/context", "text": "\n".join(f"{k}：{v}" for k, v in ctx)}, + {"sourceId": f"req:eval/ri-{idx:02d}/open", "text": "待决问题清单：\n" + "\n".join(f"- {p}" for p in picked)}, + ] + +RI_GOALS = [ + ("collect", "把待决问题组织成可填写的表单页，标注必填与选项，方便我一次收集完。", ["form"]), + ("confirm", "把已定约束与待决事项分开呈现，给我一页能逐项确认的范围页。", ["kv", "compare", "list"]), +] + +def build_ri(): + tasks = [] + for idx in range(10): + kind, goal, expect = RI_GOALS[idx % 2] + tasks.append({ + "id": f"ri-{idx+1:02d}", "family": "requirement-input", + "materials": ri_materials(idx), "goal": goal, + "expect": {"nodeTypesAny": expect, "goalKind": kind}, + }) + return tasks + +def main(): + tasks = sorted(build_rc() + build_to() + build_ri(), key=lambda t: t["id"]) + assert len(tasks) == 30, len(tasks) + assert len({t["id"] for t in tasks}) == 30 + with open(".task/genui-u1/fixtures.json", "w", encoding="utf-8") as f: + json.dump({"seed": 20261011, "tasks": tasks}, f, ensure_ascii=False, indent=1) + fam = {} + for t in tasks: + fam[t["family"]] = fam.get(t["family"], 0) + 1 + print("fixtures:", len(tasks), fam) + +if __name__ == "__main__": + main() diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/harness.py b/.task/genui-u1/harness.py new file mode 100644 index 00000000..3651c605 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/harness.py @@ -0,0 +1,272 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env python3 +"""U1 试验共享库：MiniMax 调用、组件目录提示、规格校验器（原型）。""" +import json +import os +import re +import time +import urllib.request + +BASE = os.environ.get("MINIMAX_BASE", "https://api.minimaxi.com/v1") +KEY = os.environ.get("MINIMAX_API_KEY", "") + +NODE_TYPES = { + "section", "list", "kv", "form", "markdown", "doc-ref", "actions", + "chart-lite", "avatar", "progress", "compare", "tree", "table", + "steps", "tabs", "timeline", +} +NODE_FIELDS = { # 各类型允许的顶层字段（公共字段 id/source 之外） + "section": {"type", "title", "children"}, "list": {"type", "items"}, + "kv": {"type", "kv"}, "form": {"type", "fields"}, + "markdown": {"type", "markdown"}, "doc-ref": {"type", "docId"}, + "actions": {"type", "actions"}, "chart-lite": {"type", "chart"}, + "avatar": {"type", "avatar"}, "progress": {"type", "progress"}, + "compare": {"type", "compare"}, "tree": {"type", "tree"}, + "table": {"type", "table"}, "steps": {"type", "steps"}, + "tabs": {"type", "tabs"}, "timeline": {"type", "timeline"}, +} +TONES = {"ok", "warn", "danger", "info", ""} +MAX_NODES, MAX_DEPTH, MAX_BYTES = 200, 8, 256 * 1024 + +CATALOG_PROMPT = """你是本产品中的页面生成助手：宿主给出材料与目标，你输出一页声明式页面规格（JSON），由宿主通用渲染器渲染。 +组件目录（仅允许以下 16 种节点类型；字段必须严格匹配，禁止出现目录外的类型或字段）： +- section: {"title"?, "children"?:[节点]} +- list: {"items":["字符串"]} +- kv: {"kv":[["键","值"],...]} +- form: {"fields":[{"key","label","type":"text|textarea|number|boolean|select","options"?（select 必填）,"required"?,"placeholder"?,"help"?,"default"?}]} +- markdown: {"markdown":"正文"} +- doc-ref: {"docId":"工件ID"}（docId 必须是材料中出现过的 sourceId） +- actions: {"actions":[{"id","label","style"?:"primary|default|danger"}]}（不带 command，点击降级为发送消息） +- chart-lite: {"chart":{"kind":"bar|line","labels":["…"],"series":[数值]}}（labels 与 series 等长） +- avatar: {"avatar":{"name","sub"?,"tone"?:"ok|warn|danger|info","stack"?}} +- progress: {"progress":{"label"?,"value":0~1 之间的数值}} +- compare: {"compare":{"left":{"title"?,"tone"?,"nodes"?:[节点]},"right":{同 left}}} +- tree: {"tree":{"nodes":[{"id","label","tone"?,"badge"?,"count"?,"children"?}]}} +- table: {"table":{"columns":[{"key","label"}],"rows":[{"id"?,"cells":[["列key","值"],...]}]}}（cells 与 columns 等长同序） +- steps: {"steps":{"current":0 起下标,"steps":[{"label","status"?:"pending|active|done|failed","tone"?}]}} +- tabs: {"tabs":{"tabs":[{"id","label","nodes"?:[节点]}],"active"?}} +- timeline: {"timeline":{"items":[{"title","time"?,"tone"?,"markdown"?,"ref"?}]}} +规则： +1. 每个节点可以带 "id"（整页唯一且稳定，如 n1、n2a）与 "source"（数组：支撑该节点事实内容的材料 sourceId，只能使用给定材料中的 id）。 +2. 事实性内容必须来自材料并在相应节点标注 source；你的分析、建议、推断只能放 markdown 节点，且不加 source。 +3. 硬限制：整页 ≤200 节点、嵌套 ≤8 层、规格 ≤256KiB；未知类型/字段、引用不存在的 sourceId 都会被宿主拒绝。 +4. 结构服务目标：横向比较→compare/table；风险→按严重度组织并标来源；步骤/顺序→steps/timeline；收集输入→form；概览→section/tabs 组织。 +5. 只输出一个 JSON 对象 {"title":"…","nodes":[…]}，不要输出任何其他文字、解释或代码围栏。""" + +BASELINE_PROMPT = """你是本产品中的助手。依据给定材料回答用户目标，输出为一张 Markdown 卡片（当前系统的卡片形态）。 +只使用材料中的事实，不要编造；你的判断与建议需口头标明是分析。输出即卡片正文，不要额外说明。""" + + +def call_llm(model, system, user, max_tokens, temperature=0.3, retries=3): + body = json.dumps({ + "model": model, "temperature": temperature, "max_tokens": max_tokens, + "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": system}, {"role": "user", "content": user}], + }).encode() + last = None + for i in range(retries): + req = urllib.request.Request( + BASE + "/chat/completions", data=body, + headers={"Authorization": "Bearer " + KEY, "Content-Type": "application/json"}) + t0 = time.time() + try: + with urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=180) as r: + d = json.loads(r.read()) + msg = (d.get("choices") or [{}])[0].get("message", {}) or {} + content = msg.get("content", "") or "" + raw_content = content + # MiniMax 会把 … 推理段内联进 content；剥离后才是可用的输出体。 + content = re.sub(r".*?\s*", "", content, flags=re.S).strip() + return { + "content": content, "raw_content": raw_content, + "usage": d.get("usage", {}), + "latency_s": round(time.time() - t0, 2), + } + except Exception as e: # 429/5xx/超时：退避重试 + last = str(e)[:200] + time.sleep(3 * (i + 1)) + raise RuntimeError(f"llm call failed: {last}") + + +def extract_json(text): + """从回复中剥离围栏/杂文，解析唯一 JSON 对象。""" + t = text.strip() + m = re.search(r"```(?:json)?\s*(.+?)```", t, re.S) + if m: + t = m.group(1).strip() + if not t.startswith("{"): + s, e = t.find("{"), t.rfind("}") + if s >= 0 and e > s: + t = t[s:e + 1] + return json.loads(t) + + +def _err(errors, path, msg): + errors.append(f"{path}: {msg}") + + +def _check_str_list(v, path, errors, field): + if not isinstance(v, list) or any(not isinstance(x, str) for x in v): + _err(errors, path, f"{field} 必须为字符串数组") + + +def validate_spec(spec, source_ids): + """严格校验：返回 (errors, stats)。stats 供评分（节点计数、深度、引用等）。""" + errors, stats = [], {"nodes": 0, "maxDepth": 0, "idsSeen": [], "refsUsed": set(), "unknownRefs": set(), "types": []} + + def walk(node, path, depth): + stats["nodes"] += 1 + stats["maxDepth"] = max(stats["maxDepth"], depth) + if not isinstance(node, dict): + _err(errors, path, "节点必须是对象"); return + t = node.get("type") + if t not in NODE_TYPES: + _err(errors, path, f"未知节点类型 {t!r}"); return + stats["types"].append(t) + extra = set(node) - NODE_FIELDS[t] - {"id", "source"} + if extra: + _err(errors, path, f"类型 {t} 不允许字段 {sorted(extra)}") + nid = node.get("id") + if nid is not None: + if not isinstance(nid, str) or not re.fullmatch(r"[A-Za-z0-9_-]{1,40}", nid): + _err(errors, path, f"非法 id {nid!r}") + elif nid in stats["idsSeen"]: + _err(errors, path, f"重复 id {nid!r}") + else: + stats["idsSeen"].append(nid) + src = node.get("source") + if src is not None: + if not isinstance(src, list) or any(not isinstance(x, str) for x in src): + _err(errors, path, "source 必须为字符串数组") + else: + for s in src: + (stats["refsUsed"] if s in source_ids else stats["unknownRefs"]).add(s) + if t == "list": + _check_str_list(node.get("items"), path, errors, "items") + elif t == "kv": + kv = node.get("kv") + if not isinstance(kv, list) or any(not (isinstance(p, list) and len(p) == 2 and all(isinstance(x, str) for x in p)) for p in kv): + _err(errors, path, "kv 必须为 [键,值] 对数组") + elif t == "markdown": + if not isinstance(node.get("markdown"), str): + _err(errors, path, "markdown 必须为字符串") + elif t == "doc-ref": + d = node.get("docId") + if not isinstance(d, str) or d not in source_ids: + _err(errors, path, f"docId 必须是材料 sourceId，得到 {d!r}") + else: + stats["refsUsed"].add(d) + elif t == "actions": + acts = node.get("actions") + if not isinstance(acts, list): + _err(errors, path, "actions 必须为数组") + else: + for a in acts: + if not isinstance(a, dict) or not (isinstance(a.get("id"), str) and isinstance(a.get("label"), str)) or a.get("style", "") not in {"primary", "default", "danger", ""}: + _err(errors, path, f"非法 action {a!r}") + elif "command" in a: + _err(errors, path, "试验目录不允许 command 字段") + elif t == "form": + fields = node.get("fields") + if not isinstance(fields, list) or not fields: + _err(errors, path, "form.fields 必须为非空数组") + else: + for f in fields: + ok = isinstance(f, dict) and isinstance(f.get("key"), str) and isinstance(f.get("label"), str) \ + and f.get("type") in {"text", "textarea", "number", "boolean", "select"} + if not ok: + _err(errors, path, f"非法字段 {f!r}"); continue + if f["type"] == "select" and not isinstance(f.get("options"), list): + _err(errors, path, f"select 字段 {f['key']} 缺 options") + extraF = set(f) - {"key", "label", "type", "options", "required", "placeholder", "help", "default"} + if extraF: + _err(errors, path, f"字段 {f['key']} 不允许 {sorted(extraF)}") + elif t == "chart-lite": + c = node.get("chart") + if not isinstance(c, dict) or c.get("kind") not in {"bar", "line"} \ + or not isinstance(c.get("labels"), list) or not isinstance(c.get("series"), list) \ + or len(c["labels"]) != len(c["series"]) or any(not isinstance(x, (int, float)) for x in c["series"]): + _err(errors, path, "chart 需 kind∈{bar,line} 且 labels/series 等长数值") + elif t == "progress": + p = node.get("progress") + if not isinstance(p, dict) or not isinstance(p.get("value"), (int, float)) or not (0 <= p["value"] <= 1): + _err(errors, path, "progress.value 需 0~1") + elif t == "avatar": + a = node.get("avatar") + if not isinstance(a, dict) or not isinstance(a.get("name"), str) or a.get("tone", "") not in TONES: + _err(errors, path, "非法 avatar") + elif t == "tree": + ns = node.get("tree", {}).get("nodes") + if not isinstance(ns, list): + _err(errors, path, "tree.nodes 必须为数组") + else: + def wk(n): + if not isinstance(n, dict) or not (isinstance(n.get("id"), str) and isinstance(n.get("label"), str)) or n.get("tone", "") not in TONES: + _err(errors, path, f"非法树节点 {n!r}") + else: + for c in n.get("children") or []: + wk(c) + for n in ns: + wk(n) + elif t == "table": + tb = node.get("table") + cols = (tb or {}).get("columns") if isinstance(tb, dict) else None + rows = (tb or {}).get("rows") if isinstance(tb, dict) else None + if not isinstance(cols, list) or not cols or any(not (isinstance(c, dict) and isinstance(c.get("key"), str) and isinstance(c.get("label"), str)) for c in cols): + _err(errors, path, "table.columns 非法") + elif not isinstance(rows, list): + _err(errors, path, "table.rows 必须为数组") + else: + for r in rows: + cells = r.get("cells") if isinstance(r, dict) else None + if not isinstance(cells, list) or len(cells) != len(cols) or any(not (isinstance(c, list) and len(c) == 2 and all(isinstance(x, str) for x in c)) for c in cells): + _err(errors, path, "row.cells 必须与 columns 等长且为 [key,值] 对") + elif t == "steps": + st = node.get("steps") + steps = (st or {}).get("steps") if isinstance(st, dict) else None + if not isinstance(steps, list) or not steps or not isinstance(st.get("current"), int) or not (0 <= st["current"] < len(steps)) \ + or any(not isinstance(s.get("label"), str) or s.get("status", "") not in {"pending", "active", "done", "failed", ""} for s in steps if isinstance(s, dict)): + _err(errors, path, "steps 需非空、current 在范围内、status 合法") + elif t == "tabs": + ts = node.get("tabs", {}).get("tabs") if isinstance(node.get("tabs"), dict) else None + if not isinstance(ts, list) or not ts or any(not (isinstance(x, dict) and isinstance(x.get("id"), str) and isinstance(x.get("label"), str)) for x in ts): + _err(errors, path, "tabs.tabs 非法") + else: + for x in ts: + for c in x.get("nodes") or []: + walk(c, path + f"/tab:{x['id']}", depth + 1) + elif t == "timeline": + items = (node.get("timeline") or {}).get("items") + if not isinstance(items, list) or not items or any(not (isinstance(i, dict) and isinstance(i.get("title"), str)) for i in items): + _err(errors, path, "timeline.items 非法") + elif t == "section": + for c in node.get("children") or []: + walk(c, path + "/child", depth + 1) + elif t == "compare": + cp = node.get("compare") + if not isinstance(cp, dict) or not isinstance(cp.get("left"), dict) or not isinstance(cp.get("right"), dict): + _err(errors, path, "compare 需 left/right") + else: + for side in ("left", "right"): + sd = cp[side] + if sd.get("tone", "") not in TONES: + _err(errors, path, f"compare.{side}.tone 非法") + for c in sd.get("nodes") or []: + walk(c, path + f"/{side}", depth + 1) + + if not isinstance(spec, dict) or not isinstance(spec.get("title"), str) or not isinstance(spec.get("nodes"), list): + return ["顶层必须为 {title:string, nodes:[]}"], stats + if len(json.dumps(spec, ensure_ascii=False).encode()) > MAX_BYTES: + _err(errors, "$", "规格超过 256KiB") + for n in spec["nodes"]: + walk(n, "$", 1) + if stats["nodes"] > MAX_NODES: + _err(errors, "$", f"节点数 {stats['nodes']} 超过 200") + if stats["maxDepth"] > MAX_DEPTH: + _err(errors, "$", f"嵌套深度 {stats['maxDepth']} 超过 8") + if stats["unknownRefs"]: + _err(errors, "$", f"引用了不存在的 sourceId: {sorted(stats['unknownRefs'])}") + return errors, stats + + +def build_user_message(task): + mats = "\n\n".join(f"【{m['sourceId']}】\n{m['text']}" for m in task["materials"]) + return f"材料（sourceId 如【】所示）：\n\n{mats}\n\n用户目标：{task['goal']}" diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/postprocess.py b/.task/genui-u1/postprocess.py new file mode 100644 index 00000000..1e8cc882 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/postprocess.py @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env python3 +"""剥离 MiniMax 内联 段：B 臂 markdown 与 G 臂原始输出统一清洗（保留 raw_* 备审计）。""" +import glob, json, re +n = 0 +for f in glob.glob('results/*/*.json'): + if f.endswith('summary.json'): + continue + r = json.load(open(f)) + for mdkey in ('markdown',): + md = r.get(mdkey, '') + if '' in md: + r['raw_' + mdkey] = md + r[mdkey] = re.sub(r'.*?\s*', '', md, flags=re.S).strip() + r['think_stripped'] = True + if mdkey == 'markdown': + r['ok'] = bool(r[mdkey]) + n += 1 + for rk in ('raw_first', 'raw_repair'): + rv = r.get(rk, '') + if '' in rv: + r[rk + '_original'] = rv + r[rk] = re.sub(r'.*?\s*', '', rv, flags=re.S).strip() + json.dump(r, open(f, 'w'), ensure_ascii=False, indent=1) +print('cleaned', n, 'records') diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/renderer-spike.log b/.task/genui-u1/renderer-spike.log new file mode 100644 index 00000000..0ca75e65 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/renderer-spike.log @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +== spike.mjs (json-render: validate + render, flat props contract) == +validateSpec ok: true issues: [] +component arg keys: ["element","slots","emit","on","bindings","loading","children"] +render len: 101 +render sample:
维度值
价格¥8/人/天
+catalog proto fns: constructor,__defineGetter__,__defineSetter__,hasOwnProperty,__lookupGetter__,__lookupSetter__,isPrototypeOf,propertyIsEnumerable,toString,valueOf + +== spike2.mjs (nested children composition) == +valid: true +nested render (table+steps):
价格
  1. 冻结
  2. 灰度
+ +== a2ui import probe (bare node) == +ERR: ReferenceError: HTMLElement is not defined diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/renderer-spike.md b/.task/genui-u1/renderer-spike.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..582391f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/renderer-spike.md @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +# U1 附录：json-render / A2UI renderer 选型挑战（G2） + +日期：2026-10-11。隔离环境：`/tmp/genui-renderer-spike`（不入仓）；React 19 + react-dom 19 + zod 4。 +本节为原型 spike 记录，不是生产集成声明；未做视觉/可访问性验收，未接入 @ui 真实组件。 + +## 安装与体量 + +| 包 | 版本 | 许可 | peer | 体量（node_modules） | +|---|---|---|---|---| +| @json-render/core + /react | 0.21.0 | Apache-2.0 | react ^19.2.3、zod ^4 | ~1.8M（zod 另计 ~8.1M，dev 常见） | +| @a2ui/react | 0.13.0 | Apache-2.0 | react、react-dom、zod | ~20M（含 @a2ui/web_core、markdown-it） | + +两者均可在 React 19 下干净安装，无版本冲突。 + +## json-render：端到端跑通（含嵌套组合） + +- `defineCatalog`（zod props）+ `validateSpec` + `createRenderer` + `renderToString` 全链路可用； + 用我们的 table/steps 形状定义目录，规格校验通过，嵌套组合（table 内挂 steps，经组件 + `children`）渲染正确。 +- **真实收益**：schema 驱动的规格校验（可替代手写校验器，目录即文档即校验）；扁平 elements + + children 键的规格格式与流式 patch 设计成熟。 +- **集成成本**： + 1. 组件契约是 `{element, slots, emit, on, bindings, loading, children}`——16 个 @ui 组件各需 + 一层包装 + 测试，不是「换个 switch」。 + 2. 规格为扁平格式，需与我们嵌套 UINode/Surface 信封之间加双向适配层（SurfaceVersion 联动）。 + 3. 框架自带 state store、action binding、visibility、patch 流——与我们 SSE/store/cmdbus/审批 + 职责重叠（r1 风险表「引入第二套状态/runtime」）。仅用其 render+validate 可避开，但那样 + 增量价值缩小为主要买「校验器 + 目录格式」。 + 4. `experimental_composeSpec`（决策模型组合）依赖 Vercel AI Gateway 且标注 experimental，本期不用。 + +## @a2ui/react：导入即要求 DOM，绑定模型与宿主解析相悖 + +- 包在**导入时就引用 `HTMLElement`**——裸 Node/SSR 环境直接抛错，需浏览器或 jsdom 垫片； + 仅这一点就把它推向「前端专属重依赖」档（~20M）。 +- 导出面为 `A2uiSurface` / `createComponentImplementation` / `useSignalValue` 等：数据经 + **客户端 signal/binder** 持续绑定。这与 r1 KTD4「数据绑定由宿主服务端解析、模型不能自报 + 数据值」的信任边界结构性冲突——采用它要么放弃宿主解析（否决），要么只用其组件壳不用其 + 绑定（价值进一步缩小）。 +- 本轮未做完整渲染 spike（受 DOM 前置约束），标注为 **部分完成**；结论按结构冲突已足够定型。 + +## 结论（建议，随 r2 评审确认） + +- **首期不引入外部 renderer**：扩展现有 UIRenderer + 自研校验（本试验 G 臂即其原型）成本更低、 + 无第二运行时风险；json-render 的「目录即校验」思想值得在 U2 契约里借鉴（schema 驱动目录）。 +- json-render 保留为 B 路线观察项：若后续 U5 交互闭环需要其 state/action/visibility 全家桶， + 以「render+validate 子集」重评；A2UI 客户端绑定模型与宿主授权边界冲突，不推荐作为默认路线。 + +## 复核方式 + +/tmp/genui-renderer-spike/spike.mjs、spike2.mjs（含运行输出摘录见本目录 `renderer-spike.log`）； +版本锁定：@json-render/core@0.21.0、@json-render/react@0.21.0、@a2ui/react@0.13.0、react@19。 diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/report.md b/.task/genui-u1/report.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..a1f5fb89 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/report.md @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ +# U1 受控价值与选型试验报告（A/B） + +日期：2026-10-11。任务：feature/generative-ui-u1。主记录：r1 提案 U1 节（用户 2026-10-11 裁定试验参数并指示开工）。 +全部材料为合成样本；模型 MiniMax-M3 与 MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed（官方通道）；结果 JSON 在 `results/`，本报告为唯一汇总。 + +## 一、结论摘要 + +1. **R1 结构分化成立**：同料不同目标的 6 组对照全部结构分化（类型多重集 Jaccard 0.17–0.50， + 全部 <0.6 阈值），模型确实按目标重排信息结构，不是模板换标题。 +2. **生成臂可用但文本通道有硬地板**：M3 首过合法 60%、一次修复后 83%（低于 r1 的 90%/98% + 建议目标）；终判失败 5 例**全部**为长中文 JSON 语法违纪（无一是目录形状类错误为主因）。 + 工具参数通道探针证明该类失败可消除（平台保证 JSON 序列化，仅剩可修复的语义错误） + ——**直接印证 KTD2「页面规格作为工具参数产生」的必要性，r2 将其升为硬约束**。 +3. **成本可忽略**：M3 生成 ¥0.067/任务（B 基线 ¥0.013），三臂加探针总开销 ≈¥3.0， + 远低于 ¥200 上限。 +4. **M2.7-highspeed 不适合当生成档**：文本通道合法率 20%（10 任务仅 2 份通过）， + source 纪律也弱（覆盖 0.25）；维持「生成=M3、轻量=highspeed」的既有路由结论。 +5. **外部 renderer 本期不引入**：json-render 端到端可用但组件契约重（{element,slots,emit, + bindings,children}）+自带状态/动作/可见性全家桶与我方 store/SSE/cmdbus 职责重叠； + A2UI 导入即要求 DOM 且客户端 signal 绑定与 KTD4「宿主服务端解析」结构性冲突。 + 建议 U2 借鉴其「目录即 schema 即校验」，渲染继续扩展现有 UIRenderer。 +6. **超生成倾向**：order/handover 目标下模型倾向塞入未被要求的 form/actions（rc-03 19 节点 + 含 form+actions），r2 目录需按目标类别收窄可用词汇并加「最小充分」提示。 + +## 二、主要指标 + +| 指标 | B（Markdown 基线） | G（M3 生成） | G-hs（highspeed 生成，子集） | +|---|---|---|---| +| 任务数 / 调用数 | 30 / 30 | 30 / 42（含 12 次修复） | 10 / 20 | +| 规格首过合法 | —（无规格） | 18/30（60%） | 0/10 | +| 一次修复后合法 | — | 25/30（83%） | 2/10（20%） | +| 结构契合（预期类型命中） | 0（无结构选择；compare 目标 3/3 用了 markdown 管道表） | 0.66（ri 0.88 / to 0.58 / rc 0.54） | 0.89（n=2，不具统计意义） | +| source 覆盖（引用材料源占比） | — | 0.87 | 0.25 | +| 稳定 nodeId 提供 | — | 25/25（合法规格全部提供） | 2/2 | +| prompt/completion tokens | 13.6k / 41.0k | 43.7k / 221.0k（中位 4.8k） | 18.2k / 24.5k | +| 费用（¥，保守无缓存折价） | 0.38（¥0.013/任务） | 2.00（¥0.067/任务） | 0.50 | +| 平均单任务耗时 | ~15s | ~59s | ~37s | + +R1 分化明细（同料三目标 facts-A / facts-B，6 组两两对照）：Jaccard 0.17 / 0.32 / 0.44（A 组）与 +0.26 / 0.45 / 0.50（B 组），6/6 判 distinct。示例：同一份三工具档案， +compare 目标 → section×4+table+kv+markdown（8 节点）； +risk 目标 → section×7+tree+kv×3+table+markdown×6（18 节点）； +order 目标 → steps+timeline+tree+form+actions+doc-ref×4 等（19 节点）。 + +## 三、失败归因（G 臂 5 例终判失败） + +- 无一例接近 14k token 上限（max 13366）——**不是截断**，是长中文串中的 JSON 语法违纪 + （未转义字符等）；修复轮 4 例仍语法错、1 例语义错（ri-02 修复轮出现 null 节点）。 +- 探针 1（ri-10 + `response_format=json_object`）：仍语法失败——**不解决**。 +- 探针 2（ri-10 + 工具调用 `present_page`）：解析干净通过，仅剩「children 内非对象」类 + 语义错误（修复环可处理）。生产通道定型：**工具参数**。 +- 首过失败 12 例中除语法外，目录形状错误集中在 tabs（active 放错层级）与 form（多余包装层）， + 提示目录文档需给「完整最小示例」而非仅字段表（r2 修订）。 + +## 四、renderer 选型挑战（详见 renderer-spike.md） + +- @json-render/core+react 0.21.0（Apache-2.0，React 19 peer）：defineCatalog(zod)+validateSpec+ + createRenderer+renderToString 端到端跑通（含嵌套 children 组合）。买它主要买「schema 驱动校验+ + 目录即提示」，但组件契约与状态/动作/可见性运行时与我们重复；仅用 render+validate 子集则增量 + 价值不足以抵消适配层（扁平 elements ↔ 嵌套 UINode 双向转换 + SurfaceVersion 联动 + 16 组件包装）。 +- @a2ui/react 0.13.0：导入即引用 HTMLElement（无 DOM 环境抛错，~20M 依赖）；客户端 signal/binder + 数据绑定与「宿主服务端解析数据」信任边界冲突。本轮未做完整渲染 spike（部分完成）。 +- 结论：**首期扩展自研 UIRenderer**；json-render 记为 U5 交互期重评项。 + +## 五、对 r1 的修订要点（r2） + +1. 生成通道硬约束：页面规格只能经插件命令的工具参数提交（exposeAsTool）， + 不接受聊天文本 JSON；校验器语义错误回传、原 Agent 至多重提一次（维持）。 +2. 目录文档必须携带每类型「完整最小示例」+ 按目标类别的推荐/禁用词汇表 + （收窄 order/handover 下 form/actions 的随意使用）。 +3. 校验器升级为 schema 驱动（借鉴 json-render 目录思路）：目录=提示=校验三同源， + 减少手写字段检查。 +4. 生成模型默认 MiniMax-M3；M2.7-highspeed 不进入生成路径（本轮 20% 合法率）。 +5. 规格有效率目标修订：工具通道下首过 ≥90%、修复后 ≥98% 维持为 U3 验收线； + 本轮 60%/83% 记为文本通道下界，不作为能力否决依据。 +6. U2 优先级确认：稳定 nodeId/页面信封/启禁闭环先行（本轮 nodeId 纪律良好， + 25/25 合法规格全部提供稳定 id）。 + +## 六、局限与 NOT_RUN + +- 人类可用性对照（任务成功率/耗时/满意度）未做——本轮全部为机器可判定指标； + 「20% 效率改善才扩大自动模式」的判据仍需后续人工评审任务。 +- 合成材料、n=30、每任务 1 次采样（rule-of-three：单项差异不足 3 例勿过度解读）； + G-hs 有效样本 n=2，其质量类指标不具统计意义。 +- 评分口径：结构契合按「预期类型出现比例」计，模型用 table 替代 compare 等合理替代 + 会被低估（rc 族 0.54 部分源于此）。 +- 首轮 harness 缺陷（max_tokens=6000 被内联 挤占导致 JSON 截断）已修复为 14000 + 并重跑；首轮失败样本被重跑覆盖（错误信息留存于本报告第三节与运行日志）， + 由此产生的额外调用量未入 results 统计（费用影响 <¥0.5）。 +- renderer spike 为 /tmp 隔离环境一次性运行，未入仓、未做视觉/可访问性验收。 diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-01.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-01.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..6edaba00 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-01.json @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +{ + "task": "rc-01", + "family": "research-compare", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "compare", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 2295, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 517, + "completion_tokens": 1778, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 1139 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 16.88 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "# 选型对比：VaultKeep / LarkPipe / NexusGrid\n\n> ⚠️ **关键提示（分析）**：三者分属不同功能赛道——**权限中枢 / 消息管道 / 数据表格**，并非互斥替代关系，应按业务场景匹配选型，而非单维度比拼。\n\n## 一、能力、价格与部署对比\n\n| 维度 | **VaultKeep** | **LarkPipe** | **NexusGrid** |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| 类别 | 权限中枢 | 消息管道 | 数据表格 |\n| 上线时间 | 2022-08 | 2019-03 | 2021-11 |\n| 核心能力 | RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换 | Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量 | 虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel |\n| 报价 | **¥15/人/天** | **¥5/人/天** | **¥12/人/天** |\n| 部署形态 | 国密支持 | **仅 SaaS** | **私有化可选** |\n| 近半年发版 | 7 次 | 2 次 | 7 次 |\n| 平均修复周期 | 3 天 | **1 天（最快）** | 4 天 |\n\n## 二、差异速览（基于材料事实）\n\n- **价格梯队**：LarkPipe（¥5）< NexusGrid（¥12）< VaultKeep（¥15），三者均按\"人/天\"计费。\n- **部署灵活性**：NexusGrid 唯一支持私有化；VaultKeep 提供国密（合规向）；LarkPipe 强制 SaaS。\n- **迭代活跃度**：VaultKeep 与 NexusGrid 近半年各 7 次；LarkPipe 仅 2 次——与风险备忘中\"近两季度仅小版本\"的\"升级断层（中）\"信号吻合。\n- **修复速度**：LarkPipe > VaultKeep > NexusGrid。\n\n## 三、选型建议与理由（分析）\n\n1. **统一权限与密钥管理场景 → 优先 VaultKeep**\n 国密支持契合合规需求，迭代活跃（7 次/半年）；需权衡 ¥15/人/天的成本是否可接受。\n\n2. **事件/消息集成场景 → 优先 LarkPipe**\n 价格最低、修复最快（1 天）；但\"仅 SaaS\"叠加\"供应商锁定（中）\"与\"升级断层（中）\"两项备忘风险，建议提前评估 40% 私有 API 的可替代性。\n\n3. **数据录入/表格协作场景 → 优先 NexusGrid**\n 三者中唯一支持私有化部署，迭代活跃；需接受修复周期最长（4 天）这一短板。\n\n4. **共通风险缓释（结合尽调备忘）**\n 无论选择哪一家，建议在合同条款中明确：\n - **API 退出与数据导出**——应对\"供应商锁定\"；\n - **UI 术语规范或培训计划**——应对\"培训成本（低）\"；\n - **版本升级路线与停服条款**——应对\"升级断层（中）\"。", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 16.9, + "raw_markdown": "The user wants a one-page selection comparison for a decision meeting, highlighting the three vendors' capabilities, pricing, and deployment differences, with recommendations and reasoning.\n\nLet me analyze the materials:\n\n**Vendor 1: VaultKeep**\n- Category: 权限中枢类工具 (Permission Hub)\n- Launched: 2022-08\n- Core capabilities: RBAC, temporary tokens, key rotation\n- Pricing: ¥15/人/天\n- Deployment: 国密支持 (National crypto support)\n- Updates: 7 releases in past 6 months, avg fix cycle 3 days\n\n**Vendor 2: LarkPipe**\n- Category: 消息管道类工具 (Message Pipeline)\n- Launched: 2019-03\n- Core capabilities: Webhook routing, retry policy, template variables\n- Pricing: ¥5/人/天\n- Deployment: 仅 SaaS (SaaS only)\n- Updates: 2 releases in past 6 months, avg fix cycle 1 day\n\n**Vendor 3: NexusGrid**\n- Category: 数据表格类工具 (Data Table)\n- Launched: 2021-11\n- Core capabilities: Virtual scrolling, cell validation, Excel export\n- Pricing: ¥12/人/天\n- Deployment: 私有化可选 (Private deployment optional)\n- Updates: 7 releases in past 6 months, avg fix cycle 4 days\n\n**Risk memo:**\n- Vendor lock-in (Medium): Private API ratio 40%\n- Training cost (Low): UI terminology inconsistent with existing systems\n- Upgrade gap (Medium): Only minor versions in last two quarters\n\nThese three vendors are actually different categories - they're not directly comparable as alternatives. VaultKeep is for permissions, LarkPipe is for messaging pipelines, NexusGrid is for data tables. This is an important observation.\n\nThe risk memo applies to all three (it's a general memo).\n\nLet me create a clean comparison card:\n\nThe format should be Markdown. The user wants:\n1. Highlight the three vendors' capabilities, pricing, and deployment differences\n2. Give my recommendation and reasoning\n\nI should note that these three vendors serve different functional domains, so they may not be direct substitutes. This is an important analytical insight.\n\nLet me structure this as a card:\n\n# Title with comparison\n\nThen a comparison table, then analysis/recommendation.\n\nLet me draft this:\n\n---\n\n# 选型对比：VaultKeep / LarkPipe / NexusGrid\n\n> **关键提示（分析）**：三者分属不同功能赛道（权限 / 消息管道 / 数据表格），并非互斥替代关系，选型应基于业务场景匹配，而非单一维度比拼。\n\n| 维度 | VaultKeep | LarkPipe | NexusGrid |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| 类别 | 权限中枢 | 消息管道 | 数据表格 |\n| 上线时间 | 2022-08 | 2019-03 | 2021-11 |\n| 核心能力 | RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换 | Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量 | 虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel |\n| 报价 | ¥15/人/天 | ¥5/人/天 | ¥12/人/天 |\n| 部署形态 | 国密支持 | 仅 SaaS | 私有化可选 |\n| 近半年发布 | 7 次 | 2 次 | 7 次 |\n| 平均修复周期 | 3 天 | 1 天 | 4 天 |\n\n## 差异速览（基于材料事实）\n\n- **价格**：LarkPipe（¥5）< NexusGrid（¥12）< VaultKeep（¥15），三者报价均按\"人/天\"计。\n- **部署灵活性**：NexusGrid 支持私有化（可选），VaultKeep 提供国密支持，LarkPipe 仅 SaaS。\n- **迭代活跃度**：VaultKeep 与 NexusGrid 近半年各发版 7 次，LarkPipe 仅 2 次（\"升级断层\"风险备忘指向此类信号）。\n- **修复速度**：LarkPipe 最快（1 天），VaultKeep 次之（3 天），NexusGrid 较慢（4 天）。\n\n## 建议与理由（分析）\n\n1. **若需求是统一权限与密钥管理**：优先 **VaultKeep**——国密支持契合合规场景，迭代活跃（7 次/半年），但需评估 ¥15/人/天 的成本。\n\n2. **若需求是事件/消息集成**：优先 **LarkPipe**——价格最低、修复最快，但仅 SaaS，叠加\"供应商锁定（中）\"与\"升级断层（中）\"两类备忘风险，建议提前评估私有 API（40%）的可替代性。\n\n3. **若需求是数据录入/表格协作**：优先 **NexusGrid**——唯一支持私有化部署，迭代活跃，但修复周期最长（4 天），且\"升级断层\"风险同样适用。\n\n4. **通用风险提示**：尽调备忘提到的私有 API 锁定、培训成本、升级断层三项贯穿三个供应商，建议在合同中明确：\n - API 退出/数据导出条款\n - UI 术语规范或培训覆盖\n - 版本升级路线与停服条款\n\n---\n\nThis looks comprehensive. Let me refine and make sure the format is clean as a card. The user said \"输出即卡片正文，不要额外说明\" so I shouldn't add preamble.\n\nLet me check the format constraints - it's a Markdown card for current system. Should be concise but complete.\n\nActually I think the format is good. Let me make it slightly more compact and ensure it works as a one-pager.\n\n# 选型对比：VaultKeep / LarkPipe / NexusGrid\n\n> ⚠️ **关键提示（分析）**：三者分属不同功能赛道——**权限中枢 / 消息管道 / 数据表格**，并非互斥替代关系，应按业务场景匹配选型，而非单维度比拼。\n\n## 一、能力、价格与部署对比\n\n| 维度 | **VaultKeep** | **LarkPipe** | **NexusGrid** |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| 类别 | 权限中枢 | 消息管道 | 数据表格 |\n| 上线时间 | 2022-08 | 2019-03 | 2021-11 |\n| 核心能力 | RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换 | Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量 | 虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel |\n| 报价 | **¥15/人/天** | **¥5/人/天** | **¥12/人/天** |\n| 部署形态 | 国密支持 | **仅 SaaS** | **私有化可选** |\n| 近半年发版 | 7 次 | 2 次 | 7 次 |\n| 平均修复周期 | 3 天 | **1 天（最快）** | 4 天 |\n\n## 二、差异速览（基于材料事实）\n\n- **价格梯队**：LarkPipe（¥5）< NexusGrid（¥12）< VaultKeep（¥15），三者均按\"人/天\"计费。\n- **部署灵活性**：NexusGrid 唯一支持私有化；VaultKeep 提供国密（合规向）；LarkPipe 强制 SaaS。\n- **迭代活跃度**：VaultKeep 与 NexusGrid 近半年各 7 次；LarkPipe 仅 2 次——与风险备忘中\"近两季度仅小版本\"的\"升级断层（中）\"信号吻合。\n- **修复速度**：LarkPipe > VaultKeep > NexusGrid。\n\n## 三、选型建议与理由（分析）\n\n1. **统一权限与密钥管理场景 → 优先 VaultKeep**\n 国密支持契合合规需求，迭代活跃（7 次/半年）；需权衡 ¥15/人/天的成本是否可接受。\n\n2. **事件/消息集成场景 → 优先 LarkPipe**\n 价格最低、修复最快（1 天）；但\"仅 SaaS\"叠加\"供应商锁定（中）\"与\"升级断层（中）\"两项备忘风险，建议提前评估 40% 私有 API 的可替代性。\n\n3. **数据录入/表格协作场景 → 优先 NexusGrid**\n 三者中唯一支持私有化部署，迭代活跃；需接受修复周期最长（4 天）这一短板。\n\n4. **共通风险缓释（结合尽调备忘）**\n 无论选择哪一家，建议在合同条款中明确：\n - **API 退出与数据导出**——应对\"供应商锁定\"；\n - **UI 术语规范或培训计划**——应对\"培训成本（低）\"；\n - **版本升级路线与停服条款**——应对\"升级断层（中）\"。", + "think_stripped": true +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-02.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-02.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..6299f1b1 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-02.json @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +{ + "task": "rc-02", + "family": "research-compare", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "risk", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 2084, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 518, + "completion_tokens": 1566, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 0 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 18.04 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "# 风控评审 · 风险分析页\n\n> 资料截止：内部尽调阶段｜卡片汇总【doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo】及三份供应商资料中的客观事实\n\n## 一、严重度概览\n\n| 等级 | 数量 | 项目 |\n|---|---|---|\n| 中 | 2 | 供应商锁定、升级断层 |\n| 低 | 1 | 培训成本 |\n\n---\n\n## 二、中等风险\n\n### 风险 1｜供应商锁定\n- **严重度**：中\n- **来源**：【doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo】\n- **客观证据**：私有 API 占比 40%\n- **影响分析（分析）**：40% 的私有 API 比例意味着替换供应商需重做相当一部分集成，议价空间受限。叠加【doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2】LarkPipe「仅 SaaS」的部署形态，跨供应商替换时数据与配置的可移植性进一步下降。\n- **建议（分析）**：在合同中约定 API 兼容性承诺与数据导出格式，避免被绑定在某一私有接口上。\n\n### 风险 2｜升级断层\n- **严重度**：中\n- **来源**：【doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo】\n- **客观证据**：近两季度仅小版本\n- **影响分析（分析）**：结合供应商资料，VaultKeep【vendor1】与 NexusGrid【vendor3】近半年均发布 7 次，LarkPipe【vendor2】仅 2 次，整体以修复为主、缺乏大版本演进；业务侧新需求可能长期得不到原生支持，需自建补丁。\n- **建议（分析）**：要求供应商出具未来 12 个月版本路线图，并写入合同性升级条款。\n\n---\n\n## 三、低风险\n\n### 风险 3｜培训成本\n- **严重度**：低\n- **来源**：【doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo】\n- **客观证据**：界面术语与现有系统不一致\n- **影响分析（分析）**：单看该项成本可控，但若所选工具覆盖全员日常操作（如 LarkPipe 消息管道【vendor2】、NexusGrid 数据表格【vendor3】），术语差异的叠加效应会拉高上手周期。\n- **建议（分析）**：采购前索取 UI 术语清单，与现有系统做差异比对，必要时纳入定制开发预算。\n\n---\n\n## 四、补充观察（非备忘条目，仅供评审参考｜分析）\n\n- **运维响应横向对比**：三家平均修复周期 1–4 天【vendor1:3 天｜vendor2:1 天｜vendor3:4 天】，整体处于可控区间，其中 NexusGrid 4 天为最长，可作为 SLA 谈判的参考点。\n- **部署灵活性对比**：仅 LarkPipe 不支持私有化【vendor2】，与「供应商锁定」风险形成叠加放大效应，建议在评审中合并考量。\n\n---\n\n*本卡片判断与建议部分均标注为「分析」，仅依据给定材料中的事实；超出材料的推论已明确边界。*", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 18.0, + "raw_markdown": "The user wants a risk analysis page for a risk control review. I need to:\n\n1. Organize risks by severity\n2. Mark each risk's source\n3. Mark my judgments as analysis (since I need to label judgments/suggestions as analysis)\n\nLet me extract the risks from the materials:\n\nFrom the risk memo (doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo):\n- 供应商锁定（中）：私有 API 占比 40%\n- 培训成本（低）：界面术语与现有系统不一致\n- 升级断层（中）：近两季度仅小版本\n\nBut I should also derive risks from the vendor profiles based on the analysis. Let me think about what other risks can be derived:\n\nFrom vendor materials:\n- VaultKeep: 修复周期 3 天（中等）\n- LarkPipe: 仅 SaaS（部署形态风险）\n- NexusGrid: 修复周期 4 天（较长）\n\nWait, the user said \"只使用材料中的事实，不要编造\". So I should only use facts from the materials. The risk memo explicitly lists three risks. I can cross-reference with vendor data to elaborate.\n\nLet me organize by severity:\n- 中等风险：供应商锁定、升级断层\n- 低风险：培训成本\n\nActually, I should also consider adding deployment-related risks based on facts:\n- LarkPipe 仅 SaaS - this is a deployment fact but not explicitly listed as a risk in the memo\n\nHmm, but the memo is the \"尽调风险备忘\", so I should focus on those three. But I can enrich each with supporting facts from vendor profiles where relevant.\n\nLet me check if any vendor-specific risks could be inferred:\n- VaultKeep 报价最高 ¥15/人/天 - 成本相关，但备忘录没列\n- LarkPipe 仅 SaaS - 部署形态事实，供应商锁定相关的私有API 40%可能与此相关\n\nI think the best approach is to:\n1. Use the three explicit risks from the memo\n2. Enrich them with supporting evidence from vendor profiles\n3. Organize by severity (中、低)\n4. Mark my analysis/judgment clearly\n\nLet me also note: 修复周期数据 - 平均3天、1天、4天，可以作为运维风险指标。但这不在备忘录明确列出的风险里。我会在分析部分提及，但避免编造风险。\n\nActually, looking more carefully - the memo is internal risk assessment. The vendor profiles provide evidence. I should stick to what's explicitly in the memo as risks, and use vendor data as evidence/context.\n\nLet me structure:\n\n# 风险分析页\n\n## 严重度概览\n- 中等风险：2 项\n- 低风险：1 项\n\n## 中等风险\n\n### 风险 1：供应商锁定\n- 严重度：中\n- 来源：doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\n- 证据：私有 API 占比 40%\n- 影响分析（分析）：40% 的私有 API 意味着迁移成本较高，议价空间受限。LarkPipe 仅 SaaS 部署（doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2），进一步加深对单一供应商的依赖。\n- 建议（分析）：要求供应商提供 API 兼容性承诺，或在合同中约定数据导出格式。\n\n### 风险 2：升级断层\n- 严重度：中\n- 来源：doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\n- 证据：近两季度仅小版本\n- 影响分析（分析）：结合 vendor 数据，VaultKeep 与 NexusGrid 近半年均发布 7 次但多为修复类（小版本），LarkPipe 仅 2 次更显停滞。功能演进滞后可能影响业务适配。\n- 建议（分析）：在合同中明确版本路线图与升级承诺。\n\n## 低风险\n\n### 风险 3：培训成本\n- 严重度：低\n- 来源：doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\n- 证据：界面术语与现有系统不一致\n- 影响分析（分析）：虽列低风险，但若涉及全员使用，叠加效应不可忽视。\n- 建议（分析）：在采购前索取 UI 术语表，对照现有系统做差异评估。\n\n## 补充观察（分析）\n- 运维响应对比：三家平均修复周期 1–4 天，整体可控，但 NexusGrid 4 天为最长。\n- 部署灵活性：仅 LarkPipe 不支持私有化（doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2），与\"供应商锁定\"风险叠加。\n\nThis looks good. Let me finalize the output as a Markdown card.\n\n# 风控评审 · 风险分析页\n\n> 资料截止：内部尽调阶段｜卡片汇总【doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo】及三份供应商资料中的客观事实\n\n## 一、严重度概览\n\n| 等级 | 数量 | 项目 |\n|---|---|---|\n| 中 | 2 | 供应商锁定、升级断层 |\n| 低 | 1 | 培训成本 |\n\n---\n\n## 二、中等风险\n\n### 风险 1｜供应商锁定\n- **严重度**：中\n- **来源**：【doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo】\n- **客观证据**：私有 API 占比 40%\n- **影响分析（分析）**：40% 的私有 API 比例意味着替换供应商需重做相当一部分集成，议价空间受限。叠加【doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2】LarkPipe「仅 SaaS」的部署形态，跨供应商替换时数据与配置的可移植性进一步下降。\n- **建议（分析）**：在合同中约定 API 兼容性承诺与数据导出格式，避免被绑定在某一私有接口上。\n\n### 风险 2｜升级断层\n- **严重度**：中\n- **来源**：【doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo】\n- **客观证据**：近两季度仅小版本\n- **影响分析（分析）**：结合供应商资料，VaultKeep【vendor1】与 NexusGrid【vendor3】近半年均发布 7 次，LarkPipe【vendor2】仅 2 次，整体以修复为主、缺乏大版本演进；业务侧新需求可能长期得不到原生支持，需自建补丁。\n- **建议（分析）**：要求供应商出具未来 12 个月版本路线图，并写入合同性升级条款。\n\n---\n\n## 三、低风险\n\n### 风险 3｜培训成本\n- **严重度**：低\n- **来源**：【doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo】\n- **客观证据**：界面术语与现有系统不一致\n- **影响分析（分析）**：单看该项成本可控，但若所选工具覆盖全员日常操作（如 LarkPipe 消息管道【vendor2】、NexusGrid 数据表格【vendor3】），术语差异的叠加效应会拉高上手周期。\n- **建议（分析）**：采购前索取 UI 术语清单，与现有系统做差异比对，必要时纳入定制开发预算。\n\n---\n\n## 四、补充观察（非备忘条目，仅供评审参考｜分析）\n\n- **运维响应横向对比**：三家平均修复周期 1–4 天【vendor1:3 天｜vendor2:1 天｜vendor3:4 天】，整体处于可控区间，其中 NexusGrid 4 天为最长，可作为 SLA 谈判的参考点。\n- **部署灵活性对比**：仅 LarkPipe 不支持私有化【vendor2】，与「供应商锁定」风险形成叠加放大效应，建议在评审中合并考量。\n\n---\n\n*本卡片判断与建议部分均标注为「分析」，仅依据给定材料中的事实；超出材料的推论已明确边界。*", + "think_stripped": true +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-03.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-03.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..58375ef9 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-03.json @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +{ + "task": "rc-03", + "family": "research-compare", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "order", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 2492, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 508, + "completion_tokens": 1984, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 20.71 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "# 评审后实施顺序规划\n\n> 以下阶段划分与时序判断为**分析建议**，材料未提供现成的实施路线图。\n\n## 总体思路（分析）\n三类工具按层次归类：权限中枢（VaultKeep）属**基础设施层**，数据表格（NexusGrid）属**业务承载层**，消息管道（LarkPipe）属**集成通知层**。建议按\"先底座、再业务、最后集成\"推进，以降低返工风险。\n\n---\n\n## 阶段一：基础接入 —— 权限底盘\n\n**目标**：建立访问基线与统一身份管控。\n\n| 步骤 | 依赖 |\n|---|---|\n| 1.1 部署 VaultKeep（国密支持形态） | 现有账号目录打通（材料未详述） |\n| 1.2 配置 RBAC 角色与临时令牌策略 | 1.1 |\n| 1.3 试点用户接入，验证权限链路 | 1.2 |\n| 1.4 密钥轮换流程演练 | 1.3 |\n\n**里程碑 M1**：权限底盘可用，关键系统完成角色映射。\n\n⚠️ 关注点（分析）：私有 API 占比 40%（中风险），需提前梳理可替代的标准协议；平均修复周期 3 天，建议预留故障窗口。\n\n---\n\n## 阶段二：业务承载 —— 数据表格落地\n\n**目标**：以 NexusGrid 承接核心业务视图，并与权限联动。\n\n| 步骤 | 依赖 |\n|---|---|\n| 2.1 部署 NexusGrid（私有化形态优先） | M1 |\n| 2.2 与 VaultKeep 集成，按角色配置可见性与校验 | 2.1 |\n| 2.3 迁移首批业务表，启用导出 Excel | 2.2 |\n| 2.4 用户培训：统一术语对照表 | 2.3 启动前 |\n\n**里程碑 M2**：首批业务表上线，权限联动验证通过。\n\n⚠️ 关注点（分析）：近两季度仅小版本（升级断层，中风险），建议锁定版本并制定升级演练；修复周期 4 天，需建立回滚预案；培训成本虽标\"低\"，但跨工具术语仍需前置准备。\n\n---\n\n## 阶段三：集成通知 —— 消息管道接入\n\n**目标**：通过 LarkPipe 打通跨系统自动化通知。\n\n| 步骤 | 依赖 |\n|---|---|\n| 3.1 接入 LarkPipe（SaaS 形态，材料标注仅 SaaS） | M1、M2 |\n| 3.2 配置 Webhook 路由与重试策略 | 3.1 |\n| 3.3 接入密钥轮换告警、数据变更通知 | 3.2 |\n| 3.4 模板变量与现有通知规范对齐 | 3.3 |\n\n**里程碑 M3**：自动化通知链路全量上线。\n\n⚠️ 关注点（分析）：仅 SaaS 形态 + 升级断层 + 近半年仅 2 次发布，意味着迭代节奏依赖外部排期，关键能力建议走定制扩展；同时需关注服务连续性与数据合规。\n\n---\n\n## 跨阶段事项\n\n- **供应商锁定（中，40% 私有 API）**：贯穿三阶段，建议统一封装适配层（分析）。\n- **SLA 差异**：三款工具修复周期分别为 1 / 3 / 4 天，建议纳入统一监控（分析）。\n- **成本口径**：¥5 / ¥12 / ¥15（人/天）需在 M1 前完成预算分配确认（材料未提供）。\n\n---\n\n### 阶段-里程碑速览\n\n```\n阶段一（VaultKeep）──► M1 权限底盘\n │\n阶段二（NexusGrid）──► M2 业务视图\n │\n阶段三（LarkPipe） ──► M3 自动化通知\n```", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 20.7, + "raw_markdown": "The user wants me to plan implementation sequence after review, listing steps in phases with dependencies and milestones. Let me analyze the materials:\n\nThree vendors:\n1. VaultKeep - permissions tool, Aug 2022, ¥15/person/day, national crypto support, 7 releases/half year, 3-day fix cycle\n2. LarkPipe - message pipeline tool, Mar 2019, ¥5/person/day, SaaS only, 2 releases/half year, 1-day fix cycle\n3. NexusGrid - data table tool, Nov 2021, ¥12/person/day, private deployment optional, 7 releases/half year, 4-day fix cycle\n\nRisk memo:\n- Vendor lock-in (medium): 40% proprietary API\n- Training cost (low): UI terminology inconsistent with existing systems\n- Upgrade gap (medium): only minor versions in last two quarters\n\nThe user wants a phased implementation plan with steps, dependencies, and milestones. This should be post-review (评审后), so they've already decided.\n\nI need to think about logical implementation order. Permissions (VaultKeep) is foundational - controls who can access what. Data tables (NexusGrid) often sits in the middle layer. Message pipelines (LarkPipe) usually comes last for notifications/integrations.\n\nLet me structure as Markdown card with phases, steps, dependencies, and milestones.\n\nI should note this is analysis/recommendation based on the materials. Don't fabricate facts, only use what's given.\n\nLet me draft:\n\n# 实施顺序规划（评审后）\n\n**说明**：以下阶段划分与时序判断为分析建议，具体推进需结合团队资源与项目排期。\n\n## 总体思路（分析）\n材料三类工具中，权限中枢（VaultKeep）属基础设施层，数据表格（NexusGrid）属业务承载层，消息管道（LarkPipe）属集成通知层。按照\"先底座、再业务、最后集成\"的思路推进，可降低返工风险。\n\n## 第一阶段：基础接入（基线建立）\n**目标**：完成权限底盘部署，建立访问基线。\n\n步骤：\n1. 部署 VaultKeep（国密支持形态上线）\n2. 配置 RBAC 角色模型与临时令牌策略\n3. 试点用户/部门接入，验证权限链路\n4. 密钥轮换流程演练\n\n依赖：\n- 现有系统账号目录打通（外部依赖，未在材料中详述）\n\n里程碑 M1：权限底盘可用，关键系统完成角色映射\n\n风险提示：\n- 私有 API 占比 40%（中），需提前梳理标准协议替代项（分析）\n- 修复周期 3 天，建议预留故障窗口（分析）\n\n## 第二阶段：业务承载（数据层落地）\n**目标**：引入数据表格工具承接核心业务视图。\n\n步骤：\n1. 部署 NexusGrid（私有化形态优先，材料显示该形态\"可选\"）\n2. 与 VaultKeep 集成，按角色配置单元格可见性\n3. 迁移首批业务表，配置校验规则与 Excel 导出\n4. 用户培训（材料标注培训成本：低，重点解决术语一致性）\n\n依赖：\n- M1 完成（权限角色已就位）\n- 术语对照表准备（应对\"界面术语与现有系统不一致\"，低风险但需前置）\n\n里程碑 M2：首批业务表上线，权限联动验证通过\n\n风险提示：\n- 升级断层（中，近两季度仅小版本），建议锁定版本并制定升级演练计划（分析）\n- 平均修复周期 4 天，需建立回滚预案（分析）\n\n## 第三阶段：集成通知（消息管道接入）\n**目标**：通过消息管道打通系统间通知与自动化。\n\n步骤：\n1. 接入 LarkPipe（SaaS 形态，材料显示\"仅 SaaS\"）\n2. 配置 Webhook 路由与重试策略\n3. 接入 VaultKeep 密钥轮换告警、NexusGrid 数据变更通知\n4. 模板变量与现有通知规范对齐\n\n依赖：\n- M1、M2 完成\n- 外部回调地址与白名单配置\n\n里程碑 M3：自动化通知链路全量上线\n\n风险提示：\n- 仅 SaaS 形态，结合\"升级断层（中）\"与 SaaS 锁定风险，需关注服务连续性与数据出境合规（分析）\n- 近半年发布仅 2 次，迭代节奏较慢，关键能力建议走定制扩展而非依赖官方排期（分析）\n\n## 跨阶段关注事项\n- 供应商锁定（中）：贯穿三阶段，建议统一封装适配层，降低 40% 私有 API 的耦合度（分析）\n- 版本管理：三款工具修复周期差异较大（1/3/4 天），建议纳入统一的 SLA 监控（分析）\n- 培训：术语不一致虽为低风险，但跨三款工具仍需制定统一术语表（分析）\n\n---\n\nLet me review this. I think it's good. It uses facts from materials and clearly marks analysis. The structure is clean Markdown card.\n\nLet me check word count and tighten if needed. It's reasonably concise while covering all required elements (phases, steps, dependencies, milestones).\n\nOne thing - I should double-check facts:\n- VaultKeep: 2022-08 ✓, ¥15 ✓, 国密支持 ✓, 7 releases ✓, 3 days ✓\n- LarkPipe: 2019-03 ✓, ¥5 ✓, 仅SaaS ✓, 2 releases ✓, 1 day ✓\n- NexusGrid: 2021-11 ✓, ¥12 ✓, 私有化可选 ✓, 7 releases ✓, 4 days ✓\n- Risks: 40% private API (中) ✓, training (低) ✓, upgrade gap (中) ✓\n\nAll facts used are accurate to materials. Good.\n\nLet me finalize formatting.\n\n# 评审后实施顺序规划\n\n> 以下阶段划分与时序判断为**分析建议**，材料未提供现成的实施路线图。\n\n## 总体思路（分析）\n三类工具按层次归类：权限中枢（VaultKeep）属**基础设施层**，数据表格（NexusGrid）属**业务承载层**，消息管道（LarkPipe）属**集成通知层**。建议按\"先底座、再业务、最后集成\"推进，以降低返工风险。\n\n---\n\n## 阶段一：基础接入 —— 权限底盘\n\n**目标**：建立访问基线与统一身份管控。\n\n| 步骤 | 依赖 |\n|---|---|\n| 1.1 部署 VaultKeep（国密支持形态） | 现有账号目录打通（材料未详述） |\n| 1.2 配置 RBAC 角色与临时令牌策略 | 1.1 |\n| 1.3 试点用户接入，验证权限链路 | 1.2 |\n| 1.4 密钥轮换流程演练 | 1.3 |\n\n**里程碑 M1**：权限底盘可用，关键系统完成角色映射。\n\n⚠️ 关注点（分析）：私有 API 占比 40%（中风险），需提前梳理可替代的标准协议；平均修复周期 3 天，建议预留故障窗口。\n\n---\n\n## 阶段二：业务承载 —— 数据表格落地\n\n**目标**：以 NexusGrid 承接核心业务视图，并与权限联动。\n\n| 步骤 | 依赖 |\n|---|---|\n| 2.1 部署 NexusGrid（私有化形态优先） | M1 |\n| 2.2 与 VaultKeep 集成，按角色配置可见性与校验 | 2.1 |\n| 2.3 迁移首批业务表，启用导出 Excel | 2.2 |\n| 2.4 用户培训：统一术语对照表 | 2.3 启动前 |\n\n**里程碑 M2**：首批业务表上线，权限联动验证通过。\n\n⚠️ 关注点（分析）：近两季度仅小版本（升级断层，中风险），建议锁定版本并制定升级演练；修复周期 4 天，需建立回滚预案；培训成本虽标\"低\"，但跨工具术语仍需前置准备。\n\n---\n\n## 阶段三：集成通知 —— 消息管道接入\n\n**目标**：通过 LarkPipe 打通跨系统自动化通知。\n\n| 步骤 | 依赖 |\n|---|---|\n| 3.1 接入 LarkPipe（SaaS 形态，材料标注仅 SaaS） | M1、M2 |\n| 3.2 配置 Webhook 路由与重试策略 | 3.1 |\n| 3.3 接入密钥轮换告警、数据变更通知 | 3.2 |\n| 3.4 模板变量与现有通知规范对齐 | 3.3 |\n\n**里程碑 M3**：自动化通知链路全量上线。\n\n⚠️ 关注点（分析）：仅 SaaS 形态 + 升级断层 + 近半年仅 2 次发布，意味着迭代节奏依赖外部排期，关键能力建议走定制扩展；同时需关注服务连续性与数据合规。\n\n---\n\n## 跨阶段事项\n\n- **供应商锁定（中，40% 私有 API）**：贯穿三阶段，建议统一封装适配层（分析）。\n- **SLA 差异**：三款工具修复周期分别为 1 / 3 / 4 天，建议纳入统一监控（分析）。\n- **成本口径**：¥5 / ¥12 / ¥15（人/天）需在 M1 前完成预算分配确认（材料未提供）。\n\n---\n\n### 阶段-里程碑速览\n\n```\n阶段一（VaultKeep）──► M1 权限底盘\n │\n阶段二（NexusGrid）──► M2 业务视图\n │\n阶段三（LarkPipe） ──► M3 自动化通知\n```", + "think_stripped": true +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-04.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-04.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..c68ea766 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-04.json @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +{ + "task": "rc-04", + "family": "research-compare", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "risk", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 2313, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 518, + "completion_tokens": 1795, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 1185 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 13.64 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "# 风险分析页 · 风控评审\n\n> 范围：尽调风险备忘 + 三家供应商画像（NexusGrid / LarkPipe / VaultKeep）\n\n## 🔴 高风险（1 项）\n\n### 合规缺口：数据出境条款未覆盖\n- **现象**：供应商条款中未覆盖数据出境相关约定\n- **来源**：尽调风险备忘【doc:eval/rc-04/riskmemo】\n- **判断（分析）**：材料中三家部署形态不一——LarkPipe\"仅 SaaS\"【doc:eval/rc-04/vendor2】、NexusGrid\"私有化可选\"【doc:eval/rc-04/vendor1】、VaultKeep\"国密支持\"【doc:eval/rc-04/vendor3】。SaaS 形态与\"数据出境\"风险敞口更易叠加，建议把数据出境条款设为合同必填项，未补齐前不进入采购。\n\n## 🟡 中风险（1 项）\n\n### 升级断层：近两季度仅小版本\n- **现象**：尽调记录显示近两季度仅发布小版本\n- **来源**：尽调风险备忘【doc:eval/rc-04/riskmemo】\n- **判断（分析）**：三家近半年发布频次为 NexusGrid 9 次 / LarkPipe 6 次 / VaultKeep 4 次【vendor1/2/3】。备忘未指明该断层归属哪家，建议评审前先回日志定位责任方；无论归属谁，都应在 SLA 中约定\"重大版本/安全补丁必须纳入升级窗口\"以断绝补丁断档。\n\n## 🟢 低风险（1 项）\n\n### 培训成本：界面术语与现有系统不一致\n- **现象**：界面术语与现有系统不一致，会带来培训成本\n- **来源**：尽调风险备忘【doc:eval/rc-04/riskmemo】\n- **判断（分析）**：属一次性投入，可通过术语对照表、试点期用户陪跑缓解；建议计入实施预算，不作为阻挡采购的理由。\n\n---\n\n## 📌 跨风险观察（分析，仅供参考）\n\n| 维度 | 事实速览 | 与风险的关联（分析） |\n|------|---------|-----------------|\n| 修复周期 | LarkPipe 1 天最快【vendor2】；VaultKeep 3 天【vendor3】；NexusGrid 5 天【vendor1】 | 修复越快越能对冲\"升级断层\"中风险敞口 |\n| 部署形态 | 仅 LarkPipe 不支持私有化【vendor2】 | 与\"数据出境\"高风险形成叠加，建议优先以私有化形态承载 |\n| 国密合规 | 仅 VaultKeep 支持【vendor3】 | 若涉及境内敏感数据，可作为该高风险的部分对冲 |\n\n---\n*说明：标\"判断/分析\"的内容为基于材料事实的推断，非原始材料结论，需在评审会上复核确认。*", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 13.6, + "raw_markdown": "The user wants a risk analysis card for a risk control review. I need to:\n1. Organize risks by severity\n2. Mark each risk's origin (source)\n3. Include my judgment/analysis (clearly marked as analysis)\n4. Use Markdown card format\n5. Only use facts from materials, no fabrication\n\nLet me identify the risks from the riskmemo:\n- 高 (High): 合规缺口 - 数据出境条款未覆盖\n- 中 (Medium): 升级断层 - 近两季度仅小版本\n- 低 (Low): 培训成本 - 界面术语与现有系统不一致\n\nNow let me also analyze the vendor data to see if I can add analytical insights (clearly marked as analysis):\n\nVendor1 NexusGrid: 9 releases in 6 months, 5-day fix cycle - relatively active\nVendor2 LarkPipe: 6 releases, 1-day fix cycle - very responsive\nVendor3 VaultKeep: 4 releases, 3-day fix cycle - moderate\n\nFor \"升级断层\" - which vendor might this apply to? The memo doesn't tie it to a specific vendor, but if I look at VaultKeep (4 releases/6 months, launched 2022-08, so newer), this could be relevant. However, I should be careful - the memo just says \"近两季度仅小版本\" without specifying vendor. I'll keep this tied to the memo source and offer analysis.\n\nFor \"培训成本\" - \"界面术语与现有系统不一致\" - this is from the memo, not specifically tied to a vendor.\n\nLet me also consider:\n- 合规缺口: data export clauses not covered - this is a high-risk item, applies to which vendor? Not specified, but all vendors are SaaS/private deployment. LarkPipe is \"仅 SaaS\" which is interesting given data export concerns. But I shouldn't over-infer. I'll note this as analysis.\n\nFormat: Markdown card for risk review page.\n\nLet me structure:\n- Title: 风险分析页\n- 严重度分组 (按高/中/低)\n- 每条: 风险描述、来源、判断（标明分析）\n- 汇总观察（分析）\n\nI should be careful to:\n- Only use facts from materials\n- Mark analysis clearly\n- Use the sourceIds as【doc:eval/rc-04/riskmemo】etc.\n- Not fabricate connections between memo items and specific vendors (unless the memo implies it)\n\nDraft:\n\n# 风险分析页 · 风控评审\n\n> 用途：风控评审会前阅读\n> 数据范围：尽调风险备忘 + 三家供应商画像\n\n## 🔴 高风险\n\n### 合规缺口：数据出境条款未覆盖\n- **现象**：供应商合同/条款中未覆盖数据出境相关约定\n- **来源**：尽调风险备忘【doc:eval/rc-04/riskmemo】\n- **判断（分析）**：LarkPipe 当前为\"仅 SaaS\"部署形态【doc:eval/rc-04/vendor2】，若涉及跨境服务链路，数据出境风险敞口相对更大；NexusGrid 与 VaultKeep 至少提供私有化或国密选项【doc:eval/rc-04/vendor1】【doc:eval/rc-04/vendor3】，但条款层面的合规补丁三家都需补充。建议把\"数据出境条款\"作为合同必填项，未补齐前不进入采购。\n\n## 🟡 中风险\n\n### 升级断层：近两季度仅小版本\n- **现象**：内部记录显示近两季度仅发布小版本\n- **来源**：尽调风险备忘【doc:eval/rc-04/riskmemo】\n- **判断（分析）**：从三家近半年发布频次看【doc:eval/rc-04/vendor1(9) / vendor2(6) / vendor3(4)】，若风险备忘指向其中一家，应交叉比对发布日志；若指代整个采购标的组合，则需在 SLA 中约定\"重大版本必覆盖\"，避免安全补丁断档。\n\n## 🟢 低风险\n\n### 培训成本：界面术语与现有系统不一致\n- **现象**：界面术语与现有系统不一致，会带来培训成本\n- **来源**：尽调风险备忘【doc:eval/rc-04/riskmemo】\n- **判断（分析）**：属一次性投入成本，可在试点期通过术语对照表/快捷键映射缓解；建议纳入实施预算而非阻挡采购。\n\n## 📌 汇总观察（分析）\n\n| 维度 | 观察 |\n|------|------|\n| 修复响应 | LarkPipe 平均 1 天最快【vendor2】；NexusGrid 5 天相对偏慢【vendor1】；VaultKeep 3 天居中【vendor3】 |\n| 发布活跃度 | NexusGrid 9 次 > LarkPipe 6 次 > VaultKeep 4 次【vendor1/2/3】；\"升级断层\"风险与 VaultKeep 的低频次趋势需进一步对应确认 |\n| 部署形态 | 仅 LarkPipe 不支持私有化【vendor2】，与\"数据出境条款\"高风险形成叠加点 |\n\n---\n*以上\"判断/汇总\"为基于材料事实的推断，非原始材料结论，需评审会上确认。*\n\nHmm, let me reconsider. The user said \"把你的判断\" - so they want my judgment. I should provide it but mark it as analysis. Let me refine.\n\nActually, I want to be careful about the upgrade断层 point - the memo says \"近两季度仅小版本\" but doesn't say which vendor. I shouldn't assume. Let me phrase this more carefully.\n\nAlso, I should think about whether the format is appropriate. The user wants \"风险分析页\" - a page format. Markdown card is fine.\n\nLet me finalize:\n\n# 风险分析页 · 风控评审\n\n> 范围：尽调风险备忘 + 三家供应商画像（NexusGrid / LarkPipe / VaultKeep）\n\n## 🔴 高风险（1 项）\n\n### 合规缺口：数据出境条款未覆盖\n- **现象**：供应商条款中未覆盖数据出境相关约定\n- **来源**：尽调风险备忘【doc:eval/rc-04/riskmemo】\n- **判断（分析）**：材料中三家部署形态不一——LarkPipe\"仅 SaaS\"【doc:eval/rc-04/vendor2】、NexusGrid\"私有化可选\"【doc:eval/rc-04/vendor1】、VaultKeep\"国密支持\"【doc:eval/rc-04/vendor3】。SaaS 形态与\"数据出境\"风险敞口更易叠加，建议把数据出境条款设为合同必填项，未补齐前不进入采购。\n\n## 🟡 中风险（1 项）\n\n### 升级断层：近两季度仅小版本\n- **现象**：尽调记录显示近两季度仅发布小版本\n- **来源**：尽调风险备忘【doc:eval/rc-04/riskmemo】\n- **判断（分析）**：三家近半年发布频次为 NexusGrid 9 次 / LarkPipe 6 次 / VaultKeep 4 次【vendor1/2/3】。备忘未指明该断层归属哪家，建议评审前先回日志定位责任方；无论归属谁，都应在 SLA 中约定\"重大版本/安全补丁必须纳入升级窗口\"以断绝补丁断档。\n\n## 🟢 低风险（1 项）\n\n### 培训成本：界面术语与现有系统不一致\n- **现象**：界面术语与现有系统不一致，会带来培训成本\n- **来源**：尽调风险备忘【doc:eval/rc-04/riskmemo】\n- **判断（分析）**：属一次性投入，可通过术语对照表、试点期用户陪跑缓解；建议计入实施预算，不作为阻挡采购的理由。\n\n---\n\n## 📌 跨风险观察（分析，仅供参考）\n\n| 维度 | 事实速览 | 与风险的关联（分析） |\n|------|---------|-----------------|\n| 修复周期 | LarkPipe 1 天最快【vendor2】；VaultKeep 3 天【vendor3】；NexusGrid 5 天【vendor1】 | 修复越快越能对冲\"升级断层\"中风险敞口 |\n| 部署形态 | 仅 LarkPipe 不支持私有化【vendor2】 | 与\"数据出境\"高风险形成叠加，建议优先以私有化形态承载 |\n| 国密合规 | 仅 VaultKeep 支持【vendor3】 | 若涉及境内敏感数据，可作为该高风险的部分对冲 |\n\n---\n*说明：标\"判断/分析\"的内容为基于材料事实的推断，非原始材料结论，需在评审会上复核确认。*", + "think_stripped": true +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-05.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-05.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..fc8fae2a --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-05.json @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +{ + "task": "rc-05", + "family": "research-compare", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "order", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 1824, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 515, + "completion_tokens": 1309, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 15.31 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "# 实施分阶段规划（评审后 · v0.1）\n\n> 卡片说明：以下阶段次序与依赖关系为**分析建议**，需结合贵司合规、采购流程最终敲定。所有事实取自三份供应商资料与尽调风险备忘。\n\n## 一、阶段总览\n\n| 阶段 | 目标 | 入选供应商（按建议顺序） | 关键产物 |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| **P0 合同与合规加固** | 关闭「数据出境」合规缺口 | —（无供应商介入） | 数据出境补充条款；DPO 评审通过 |\n| **P1 轻量先行** | 跑通集成链路、验证团队协作模式 | LarkPipe | Webhook 路由模板、重试策略配置 |\n| **P2 中台扩展** | 引入流程编排，补强治理能力 | FlowSync | 审批链、SSO/审计日志启用 |\n| **P3 重型模块放行** | 在性能基准达标后启用数据表格 | NexusGrid | 万行表格基准报告、导出与单元格校验落地 |\n\n---\n\n## 二、阶段依赖与前置条件\n\n- **P0 → P1/P2/P3（强依赖）**\n 风险备忘标记「数据出境条款未覆盖」为高风险 ——【doc:eval/rc-05/riskmemo】。三款工具均涉及数据流转（LarkPipe 仅 SaaS、FlowSync 含 REST 连接器、NexusGrid 支持私有化），未补条款前不应进入生产环境。\n\n- **P1 → P2（弱依赖，分析建议）**\n LarkPipe 提供消息通道与模板变量，作为 FlowSync 编排触发的上游信号源，可减少重复建设；并且 LarkPipe 上线最早（2019-03）、修复周期最短（2 天），适合做\"探路石\"。\n\n- **P2 → P3（强依赖）**\n 风险备忘标记「万行表格场景无官方基准」为高风险【doc:eval/rc-05/riskmemo】。在 P3 准入前必须以官方或第三方基准复测 NexusGrid 性能，否则不进入试点。\n\n- **横向依赖**\n - SSO 与审计日志（FlowSync 已具备）建议在 P2 统一启用，便于 P3 复用同一身份与审计基线。\n - 私有 API 占比 40%（中风险），P3 起须建立 API 抽象层或适配器，缓解锁定。\n\n---\n\n## 三、里程碑\n\n| # | 里程碑 | 准入判据 | 建议时间盒（分析） |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| M0 | 合同补充条款签署 | DPO/法务通过 | P0 末 |\n| M1 | LarkPipe 试点上线 | 日均消息成功率 ≥ 99%（阈值需自定） | P1 末 |\n| M2 | FlowSync 接入首批审批流 | SSO 全量启用 + 审计日志留存可查询 | P2 末 |\n| M3 | NexusGrid 性能放行评审 | 万行场景达成既定 P95 指标 | P3 准入 |\n| M4 | NexusGrid 试点上线 | 与 LarkPipe、FlowSync 联调通过 | P3 末 |\n| M5 | 全量切换 | M1–M4 全部达成；退出/回滚预案到位 | 切换后 4 周观察期 |\n\n---\n\n## 四、需要用户确认的开放项\n\n1. **P3 性能基准的指标与工具**：风险备忘未给出官方基准，阈值需贵司业务方定义。\n2. **私有 API 40% 的范围**：三款工具各自私有 API 占比未披露，需向厂商索取 OpenAPI 覆盖清单。\n3. **P0 条款是否覆盖 SaaS-only 的 LarkPipe**：仅 SaaS 形态下数据出境路径需单独评估【doc:eval/rc-05/vendor3】。\n4. **是否允许\"分阶段并行小范围试点\"**：以上为串行建议，若合规提前到位，P1 与 P2 可并行。", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 15.3, + "raw_markdown": "The user wants me to plan implementation sequence after a review, listing stages, dependencies, and milestones. This is for a procurement/vendor evaluation context based on the materials provided.\n\nLet me analyze the materials:\n- Three vendors: FlowSync (workflow orchestration), NexusGrid (data table), LarkPipe (message pipeline)\n- Risk memo flags: high compliance gap (cross-border data), medium vendor lock-in (40% private API), high unverified performance (no benchmark for 10k rows)\n\nThe user wants:\n1. Phased implementation steps\n2. Dependencies\n3. Milestones\n\nI need to output as a Markdown card. I should only use facts from materials and label judgments/analysis as such. No fabrication.\n\nLet me structure this:\n\nPhase approach based on risks and dependencies:\n- LarkPipe (cheapest, mature since 2019, fastest patch cycle - 2 days, only SaaS) - lowest entry risk but SaaS = data egress concern\n- FlowSync (SSO, audit logs - good compliance features, moderate price, newer 2023)\n- NexusGrid (most expensive, has private deployment option, but performance unverified)\n\nThe risk memo highlights:\n- Data egress not covered (high) - affects all\n- Lock-in 40% private API (medium)\n- Performance unverified for 10k rows (high) - directly relevant to NexusGrid\n\nLogical phasing:\n1. Pre-implementation: address compliance gap (data egress contract addendum) - prerequisite\n2. Phase 1: LarkPipe - lightest, mature, can validate integration patterns\n3. Phase 2: FlowSync - leverage SSO/audit log for governance\n4. Phase 3: NexusGrid - gated by performance benchmark due to unverified risk\n\nOr could argue NexusGrid first to validate performance risk early. But typical practice: start low-risk, then escalation. I'll present analysis and let user decide.\n\nDependencies:\n- Compliance contract amendment blocks all (data egress)\n- LarkPipe templates inform FlowSync orchestration\n- NexusGrid performance benchmark gates rollout\n\nMilestones: kickoff, sandbox, pilot, full rollout per phase\n\nLet me draft the card. I'll use a Markdown table for phases, list dependencies, then milestones. Mark analysis clearly.\n\nLet me make it clean and useful.\n\n# 实施分阶段规划（评审后 · v0.1）\n\n> 卡片说明：以下阶段次序与依赖关系为**分析建议**，需结合贵司合规、采购流程最终敲定。所有事实取自三份供应商资料与尽调风险备忘。\n\n## 一、阶段总览\n\n| 阶段 | 目标 | 入选供应商（按建议顺序） | 关键产物 |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| **P0 合同与合规加固** | 关闭「数据出境」合规缺口 | —（无供应商介入） | 数据出境补充条款；DPO 评审通过 |\n| **P1 轻量先行** | 跑通集成链路、验证团队协作模式 | LarkPipe | Webhook 路由模板、重试策略配置 |\n| **P2 中台扩展** | 引入流程编排，补强治理能力 | FlowSync | 审批链、SSO/审计日志启用 |\n| **P3 重型模块放行** | 在性能基准达标后启用数据表格 | NexusGrid | 万行表格基准报告、导出与单元格校验落地 |\n\n---\n\n## 二、阶段依赖与前置条件\n\n- **P0 → P1/P2/P3（强依赖）**\n 风险备忘标记「数据出境条款未覆盖」为高风险 ——【doc:eval/rc-05/riskmemo】。三款工具均涉及数据流转（LarkPipe 仅 SaaS、FlowSync 含 REST 连接器、NexusGrid 支持私有化），未补条款前不应进入生产环境。\n\n- **P1 → P2（弱依赖，分析建议）**\n LarkPipe 提供消息通道与模板变量，作为 FlowSync 编排触发的上游信号源，可减少重复建设；并且 LarkPipe 上线最早（2019-03）、修复周期最短（2 天），适合做\"探路石\"。\n\n- **P2 → P3（强依赖）**\n 风险备忘标记「万行表格场景无官方基准」为高风险【doc:eval/rc-05/riskmemo】。在 P3 准入前必须以官方或第三方基准复测 NexusGrid 性能，否则不进入试点。\n\n- **横向依赖**\n - SSO 与审计日志（FlowSync 已具备）建议在 P2 统一启用，便于 P3 复用同一身份与审计基线。\n - 私有 API 占比 40%（中风险），P3 起须建立 API 抽象层或适配器，缓解锁定。\n\n---\n\n## 三、里程碑\n\n| # | 里程碑 | 准入判据 | 建议时间盒（分析） |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| M0 | 合同补充条款签署 | DPO/法务通过 | P0 末 |\n| M1 | LarkPipe 试点上线 | 日均消息成功率 ≥ 99%（阈值需自定） | P1 末 |\n| M2 | FlowSync 接入首批审批流 | SSO 全量启用 + 审计日志留存可查询 | P2 末 |\n| M3 | NexusGrid 性能放行评审 | 万行场景达成既定 P95 指标 | P3 准入 |\n| M4 | NexusGrid 试点上线 | 与 LarkPipe、FlowSync 联调通过 | P3 末 |\n| M5 | 全量切换 | M1–M4 全部达成；退出/回滚预案到位 | 切换后 4 周观察期 |\n\n---\n\n## 四、需要用户确认的开放项\n\n1. **P3 性能基准的指标与工具**：风险备忘未给出官方基准，阈值需贵司业务方定义。\n2. **私有 API 40% 的范围**：三款工具各自私有 API 占比未披露，需向厂商索取 OpenAPI 覆盖清单。\n3. **P0 条款是否覆盖 SaaS-only 的 LarkPipe**：仅 SaaS 形态下数据出境路径需单独评估【doc:eval/rc-05/vendor3】。\n4. **是否允许\"分阶段并行小范围试点\"**：以上为串行建议，若合规提前到位，P1 与 P2 可并行。", + "think_stripped": true +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-06.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-06.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..da1db08c --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-06.json @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +{ + "task": "rc-06", + "family": "research-compare", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "compare", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 1622, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 517, + "completion_tokens": 1105, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 378 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 19.94 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "# 选型对比：LarkPipe / EchoDocs / NexusGrid\n\n> 用途：决策会一页对比材料｜数据来源：三家厂商资料 + 内部尽调备忘\n\n## 一、横向对比表\n\n| 维度 | **LarkPipe** 消息管道 | **EchoDocs** 文档协同 | **NexusGrid** 数据表格 |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| 上线时间 | 2019-03 | 2020-06 | 2021-11 |\n| 核心能力 | Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量 | 批注、版本链、全文检索 | 虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel |\n| 报价（¥/人/天） | **5** | 9 | 12 |\n| 部署形态 | 仅 SaaS | 无离线（仅 SaaS） | **私有化可选** |\n| 近半年发布次数 | 6 | **9** | 5 |\n| 平均修复周期 | 3 天 | 2 天 | **1 天** |\n\n## 二、关键差异速读\n\n- **能力定位不重叠**：三者分属消息管道 / 文档协同 / 数据表格 三类工具，不构成\"同品类直接替代\"关系。\n- **价格阶梯明显**：以 NexusGrid 为基准（12），LarkPipe 为 **42%**，EchoDocs 为 75%。\n- **部署灵活度仅 NexusGrid**：另两家都强制 SaaS，无法私有化。\n- **迭代节奏**：EchoDocs 发布最勤（9 次），NexusGrid 修复最快（1 天）。\n\n## 三、尽调风险（来自内部备忘）\n\n| 风险项 | 等级 | 说明 |\n|---|---|---|\n| 供应商锁定 | 中 | 私有 API 占比 40% |\n| 性能未验证 | 高 | **万行表格场景无官方基准**（直接影响 NexusGrid 选用判断） |\n| 培训成本 | 低 | 界面术语与现有系统不一致 |\n\n## 四、建议\n\n> 以下为分析判断，非材料原文。\n\n**1. 不要\"三选一\"，按场景分别引入。**\n三者能力象限互不重叠，\"选一个\"问题本身不成立。建议按业务诉求分别评估，而不是在决策会上强行排序。\n\n**2. 数据表格场景（NexusGrid）需先补性能证据，再决定。**\n理由：\n- 唯一支持私有化部署（合规与数据驻留友好）；\n- 平均修复周期最短（1 天）；\n- 但风险备忘明确标注\"万行表格无官方基准\"，且私有 API 占比 40%——若实际业务存在万行以上表场景，应要求厂商出具基准报告或做 POC，否则不宜直接采购。\n\n**3. 消息管道（LarkPipe）适合先行试点。**\n理由：单价最低（¥5/人/天），SaaS 部署可快速验证 Webhook 路由与重试策略是否覆盖现有需求；先小范围跑通，再根据 40% 锁定风险决定是否后续封装适配层。\n\n**4. 文档协同（EchoDocs）建议暂缓评估。**\n理由：发布频率最高（9 次/半年）说明产品仍在快速迭代，叠加 SaaS-only 与界面术语不一致（培训成本低但存在），等待 1–2 个稳定版本后再评估更稳妥。\n\n**5. 共同动作：要求三家补充脱敏后的 API 文档。**\n私有 API 40% 占比是统一隐患，无论选哪家都应提前评估迁移与替代成本。", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 19.9, + "raw_markdown": "The user wants a one-page selection comparison for a decision meeting, highlighting the capabilities, pricing, and deployment differences of three tools, and providing my recommendation and reasoning.\n\nTools:\n1. LarkPipe - Message pipeline tool, 2019-03 launched\n - Capabilities: Webhook routing, retry strategy, template variables\n - Price: ¥5/person/day\n - Deployment: SaaS only\n - Releases last 6 months: 6 times, avg fix cycle: 3 days\n\n2. EchoDocs - Document collaboration tool, 2020-06 launched\n - Capabilities: Annotation, version chain, full-text search\n - Price: ¥9/person/day\n - Deployment: No offline (SaaS only)\n - Releases last 6 months: 9 times, avg fix cycle: 2 days\n\n3. NexusGrid - Data table tool, 2021-11 launched\n - Capabilities: Virtual scrolling, cell validation, export to Excel\n - Price: ¥12/person/day\n - Deployment: Private deployment optional\n - Releases last 6 months: 5 times, avg fix cycle: 1 day\n\nRisk memo:\n- Vendor lock-in (medium): Private API ratio 40%\n- Performance unverified (high): No official benchmark for 10k-row tables\n- Training cost (low): UI terminology inconsistent with existing systems\n\nLet me create a Markdown card with comparison table and recommendations.\n\nI need to:\n1. Highlight capabilities, pricing, deployment differences\n2. Give my recommendation with reasoning (marked as analysis)\n3. Use only facts from materials, no fabrication\n\nLet me structure this as a one-page card:\n- Title\n- Comparison table (capabilities, pricing, deployment, iteration speed)\n- Risk notes\n- Recommendation with analysis\n\nFormat: Markdown card, no extra commentary.\n\n# 选型对比：LarkPipe / EchoDocs / NexusGrid\n\n> 用途：决策会一页对比材料｜数据来源：三家厂商资料 + 内部尽调备忘\n\n## 一、横向对比表\n\n| 维度 | **LarkPipe** 消息管道 | **EchoDocs** 文档协同 | **NexusGrid** 数据表格 |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| 上线时间 | 2019-03 | 2020-06 | 2021-11 |\n| 核心能力 | Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量 | 批注、版本链、全文检索 | 虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel |\n| 报价（¥/人/天） | **5** | 9 | 12 |\n| 部署形态 | 仅 SaaS | 无离线（仅 SaaS） | **私有化可选** |\n| 近半年发布次数 | 6 | **9** | 5 |\n| 平均修复周期 | 3 天 | 2 天 | **1 天** |\n\n## 二、关键差异速读\n\n- **能力定位不重叠**：三者分属消息管道 / 文档协同 / 数据表格 三类工具，不构成\"同品类直接替代\"关系。\n- **价格阶梯明显**：以 NexusGrid 为基准（12），LarkPipe 为 **42%**，EchoDocs 为 75%。\n- **部署灵活度仅 NexusGrid**：另两家都强制 SaaS，无法私有化。\n- **迭代节奏**：EchoDocs 发布最勤（9 次），NexusGrid 修复最快（1 天）。\n\n## 三、尽调风险（来自内部备忘）\n\n| 风险项 | 等级 | 说明 |\n|---|---|---|\n| 供应商锁定 | 中 | 私有 API 占比 40% |\n| 性能未验证 | 高 | **万行表格场景无官方基准**（直接影响 NexusGrid 选用判断） |\n| 培训成本 | 低 | 界面术语与现有系统不一致 |\n\n## 四、建议\n\n> 以下为分析判断，非材料原文。\n\n**1. 不要\"三选一\"，按场景分别引入。**\n三者能力象限互不重叠，\"选一个\"问题本身不成立。建议按业务诉求分别评估，而不是在决策会上强行排序。\n\n**2. 数据表格场景（NexusGrid）需先补性能证据，再决定。**\n理由：\n- 唯一支持私有化部署（合规与数据驻留友好）；\n- 平均修复周期最短（1 天）；\n- 但风险备忘明确标注\"万行表格无官方基准\"，且私有 API 占比 40%——若实际业务存在万行以上表场景，应要求厂商出具基准报告或做 POC，否则不宜直接采购。\n\n**3. 消息管道（LarkPipe）适合先行试点。**\n理由：单价最低（¥5/人/天），SaaS 部署可快速验证 Webhook 路由与重试策略是否覆盖现有需求；先小范围跑通，再根据 40% 锁定风险决定是否后续封装适配层。\n\n**4. 文档协同（EchoDocs）建议暂缓评估。**\n理由：发布频率最高（9 次/半年）说明产品仍在快速迭代，叠加 SaaS-only 与界面术语不一致（培训成本低但存在），等待 1–2 个稳定版本后再评估更稳妥。\n\n**5. 共同动作：要求三家补充脱敏后的 API 文档。**\n私有 API 40% 占比是统一隐患，无论选哪家都应提前评估迁移与替代成本。", + "think_stripped": true +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-07.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-07.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..dbb72c97 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-07.json @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +{ + "task": "rc-07", + "family": "research-compare", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "compare", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 3017, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 517, + "completion_tokens": 2500, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 25.51 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "# 选型对比 · 决策会一页\n\n## 三家速览\n\n| 维度 | **LarkPipe** | **VaultKeep** | **EchoDocs** |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| 定位 | 消息管道类 | 权限中枢类 | 文档协同类 |\n| 上线时间 | 2019-03 | 2022-08 | 2020-06 |\n| 核心能力 | Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量 | RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换 | 批注、版本链、全文检索 |\n| 报价 | ¥5 / 人 / 天 | ¥15 / 人 / 天 | ¥9 / 人 / 天 |\n| 部署形态 | 仅 SaaS | 支持国密 | 无离线 |\n| 近半年发布 | 7 次 | 4 次 | 2 次 |\n| 平均修复周期 | 2 天 | 4 天 | 1 天 |\n\n## 关键差异（一图三句话）\n\n- **能力域不同**：管道 / 权限 / 文档，三者非完全可替代。\n- **价格梯度**：VaultKeep ≈ 3× LarkPipe，EchoDocs 居中。\n- **部署取舍**：LarkPipe 强绑 SaaS；VaultKeep 唯一提供国密合规；EchoDocs 不支持离线。\n\n## 内部尽调备忘\n\n| 风险项 | 等级 |\n|---|---|\n| 性能未验证：万行表格场景无官方基准 | **高** |\n| 培训成本：界面术语与现有系统不一致 | **低** |\n| 供应商锁定：私有 API 占比 40% | **中** |\n\n> 分析：备忘未点明指向哪家，但\"万行表格\"\"界面术语\"两项语义最贴合**文档协同**场景，落地 EchoDocs 时建议重点复核。\n\n---\n\n## 建议（供决策会讨论）\n\n**分析结论，非材料原文：**\n\n1. **先定需求域再选型**。若本次仅补\"文档协同 / 权限 / 管道\"其中一块，按上表对位评估；若三块都缺，建议**分别纳入而非互斥**，三者能力并不重叠。\n2. **活跃度 +", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 25.5, + "raw_markdown": "The user wants a one-page selection comparison for a decision meeting, highlighting the capabilities, pricing, and deployment differences of three vendors, and giving my recommendation with reasons.\n\nLet me extract the key facts from the materials:\n\n**Vendor 1: LarkPipe**\n- Category: 消息管道类工具 (Message pipeline)\n- Launched: 2019-03\n- Core capabilities: Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量\n- Price: ¥5/人/天\n- Deployment: 仅 SaaS (SaaS only)\n- Recent 6 months: 7 releases, avg fix cycle 2 days\n\n**Vendor 2: VaultKeep**\n- Category: 权限中枢类工具 (Permission hub)\n- Launched: 2022-08\n- Core capabilities: RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换\n- Price: ¥15/人/天\n- Deployment: 国密支持 (Supports national crypto)\n- Recent 6 months: 4 releases, avg fix cycle 4 days\n\n**Vendor 3: EchoDocs**\n- Category: 文档协同类工具 (Document collaboration)\n- Launched: 2020-06\n- Core capabilities: 批注、版本链、全文检索\n- Price: ¥9/人/天\n- Deployment: 无离线 (No offline)\n- Recent 6 months: 2 releases, avg fix cycle 1 day\n\n**Risk memo:**\n- 性能未验证（高）：万行表格场景无官方基准 (Performance unverified HIGH: no official benchmark for 10k-row tables)\n- 培训成本（低）：界面术语与现有系统不一致 (Training cost LOW: terminology differs from existing systems)\n- 供应商锁定（中）：私有 API 占比 40% (Vendor lock-in MEDIUM: proprietary API at 40%)\n\nNow, I need to think about what recommendation to give. The materials don't explicitly say which domain this is for — I need to infer context. The fact that the risk memo mentions \"万行表格场景\" (10k-row table scenarios) suggests this is a document/spreadsheet collaboration scenario — which points to EchoDocs.\n\nWait, but the risk memo doesn't specify which vendor the risks apply to. Let me re-read... The risk memo is just a \"尽调风险备忘\" (due diligence risk memo) for the procurement overall. The \"万行表格场景无官方基准\" likely applies to EchoDocs (since it's the doc collaboration tool and tables are its domain). But strictly speaking, the memo doesn't say.\n\nLet me be careful: the instruction says \"只使用材料中的事实，不要编造\" (only use facts from materials, don't fabricate) and \"你的判断与建议需口头标明是分析\" (your judgment and recommendations need to be verbally marked as analysis).\n\nSo I should:\n1. Build a comparison table\n2. Mark my analysis/recommendation clearly\n3. Note the risk memo items (they appear to relate most relevantly to EchoDocs given the \"万行表格\" mention, but I should be careful — actually the memo doesn't specify which vendor)\n\nHmm, looking at the risk memo more carefully:\n- \"万行表格场景无官方基准\" — this strongly suggests document collaboration (EchoDocs), since that's where you'd have tables\n- \"界面术语与现有系统不一致\" — also suggests UI exposure (EchoDocs again, since the user would interact with it)\n- \"私有 API 占比 40%\" — could be any of them, but more relevant for the system being deeply integrated, which would be EchoDocs if chosen\n\nActually, all three risks could plausibly apply to any one vendor. Without more explicit attribution, I'll present them as general due diligence findings. But I can note which is most relevant contextually — actually let me not over-attribute. I'll just present them as the memo states.\n\nWait, actually, considering the user wants a \"选型对比\" (selection comparison), it's likely they're choosing among these three for one need, or evaluating them as a bundle? Let me think...\n\nActually, the three tools serve different functions: 消息管道, 权限中枢, 文档协同. These could all be needed in a stack. But the comparison format suggests they're being compared as alternatives. Let me present both: comparison and note that they serve different functions, but per the request, give a comparison and recommendation.\n\nGiven the framing, I'll assume these are three candidates being considered for the same procurement slot (or for selection among). I'll do a clean comparison and give my analytical recommendation.\n\nFor recommendation: I'll note as analysis that:\n- Each addresses different needs, so they may not be direct substitutes\n- But if forced to choose one or rank on common criteria (price/responsiveness):\n - LarkPipe: cheapest, most active releases, fastest fix cycles — but SaaS-only\n - VaultKeep: most expensive, 国密支持 is unique (compliance value), slower fix cycles\n - EchoDocs: middle pricing, fastest fix (1 day), but \"无离线\" and the risk memo's performance/training concerns likely target this category\n\nThe \"万行表格\" risk almost certainly targets EchoDocs. So the risk memo's HIGH-severity item is most applicable to EchoDocs.\n\nLet me structure the card:\n\n# Title\n- 一页选型对比 table\n- Key differences callout\n- 风险提示\n- 分析 + 建议\n\nLet me draft now. I should use the card markdown format appropriately.\n\nGiven this is for a decision meeting (\"一页选型对比\"), I should be concise but thorough. Let me write the card.\n\nActually, I want to be careful about the format. The system says \"输出即卡片正文，不要额外说明\" (output is the card body, no extra explanation). So I just produce the markdown content directly.\n\nLet me draft:\n\n---\n\n# 选型对比 · 决策会一页\n\n| 维度 | LarkPipe | VaultKeep | EchoDocs |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| 定位 | 消息管道 | 权限中枢 | 文档协同 |\n| 上线时间 | 2019-03 | 2022-08 | 2020-06 |\n| 核心能力 | Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量 | RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换 | 批注、版本链、全文检索 |\n| 报价 | ¥5/人/天 | ¥15/人/天 | ¥9/人/天 |\n| 部署形态 | 仅 SaaS | 国密支持 | 无离线 |\n| 近半年发布 | 7 次 | 4 次 | 2 次 |\n| 平均修复周期 | 2 天 | 4 天 | 1 天 |\n\n## 关键差异\n\n- **能力差异**：三家分属不同职能域（管道 / 权限 / 文档），非完全可替代。\n- **价格差异**：VaultKeep 为 LarkPipe 的 3 倍；EchoDocs 居中。\n- **部署差异**：LarkPipe 限定 SaaS；VaultKeep 提供国密合规能力；EchoDocs 不支持离线。\n\n## 尽调风险（内部备忘）\n\n- ⚠️ **性能未验证（高）**：万行表格场景无官方基准\n- ⚠️ **培训成本（低）**：界面术语与现有系统不一致\n- ⚠️ **供应商锁定（中）**：私有 API 占比 40%\n\n> 分析：从备忘中\"万行表格\"\"界面术语\"两项判断，性能与培训两项风险最贴合 **EchoDocs** 所处场景，建议重点验证。私有 API 40% 属通用关切。\n\n## 建议\n\n**分析意见**（供讨论）：\n\n1. **先定位再选型**：若本次需求为单点替代（例如只补\"文档协同\"或只补\"权限\"），按上表对应项评估；若需三块能力齐备，建议并行纳入而非互斥。\n2. 若必须在三者间取舍，按\"活跃度 + 修复速度\"组合：LarkPipe（7 次/2 天）> EchoDocs（2 次/1 天）> VaultKeep（4 次/4 天）。\n3. 若存在合规/国密硬性要求，国密能力仅 VaultKeep 提供，需优先其议价。\n4. 最终落定前，**要求供应商提供\"万行表格\"基准的实测数据**，并复核 API 开放比例，以缓解备忘中的中高风险。\n\n---\n\nLet me refine this. I think this is solid. Let me check the facts:\n- All facts come directly from the material\n- Analysis is clearly marked as \"分析\"\n- No fabricated info\n- Comparison is clear\n\nOne thing to double-check: should I recommend a single one? The user said \"给出你的建议与理由\" (give your recommendation and reasoning). I think I'm right to not pick a single winner because they're different categories — and provide conditional guidance. That's honest given the materials.\n\nLet me also consider: the \"万行表格\" risk might be a general risk statement that's not tied to any vendor. Let me re-read... \"尽调风险备忘（内部）\" — it's a general due diligence memo. The items don't specify which vendor. But contextually, \"万行表格\" and \"界面术语\" most naturally apply to a doc collab tool.\n\nActually, I should be conservative and not directly attribute — but I can note that contextually it appears to target document collaboration tools. Let me adjust slightly.\n\nLet me also think about format — the system says \"Markdown 卡片\". I'll use clean markdown with a table. I think my draft is good.\n\nOne more thought: should the title be more concise? \"选型对比 · 一页\" maybe. Let me finalize.\n\nFinal output check — making sure I'm not adding information not in the materials:\n- Pricing, capabilities, deployment, release frequency, fix cycles — all from materials\n- Risk memo items — verbatim from materials\n- Analysis — clearly labeled\n- No invented facts\n\nGood, I'll output the card.\n\n# 选型对比 · 决策会一页\n\n## 三家速览\n\n| 维度 | **LarkPipe** | **VaultKeep** | **EchoDocs** |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| 定位 | 消息管道类 | 权限中枢类 | 文档协同类 |\n| 上线时间 | 2019-03 | 2022-08 | 2020-06 |\n| 核心能力 | Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量 | RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换 | 批注、版本链、全文检索 |\n| 报价 | ¥5 / 人 / 天 | ¥15 / 人 / 天 | ¥9 / 人 / 天 |\n| 部署形态 | 仅 SaaS | 支持国密 | 无离线 |\n| 近半年发布 | 7 次 | 4 次 | 2 次 |\n| 平均修复周期 | 2 天 | 4 天 | 1 天 |\n\n## 关键差异（一图三句话）\n\n- **能力域不同**：管道 / 权限 / 文档，三者非完全可替代。\n- **价格梯度**：VaultKeep ≈ 3× LarkPipe，EchoDocs 居中。\n- **部署取舍**：LarkPipe 强绑 SaaS；VaultKeep 唯一提供国密合规；EchoDocs 不支持离线。\n\n## 内部尽调备忘\n\n| 风险项 | 等级 |\n|---|---|\n| 性能未验证：万行表格场景无官方基准 | **高** |\n| 培训成本：界面术语与现有系统不一致 | **低** |\n| 供应商锁定：私有 API 占比 40% | **中** |\n\n> 分析：备忘未点明指向哪家，但\"万行表格\"\"界面术语\"两项语义最贴合**文档协同**场景，落地 EchoDocs 时建议重点复核。\n\n---\n\n## 建议（供决策会讨论）\n\n**分析结论，非材料原文：**\n\n1. **先定需求域再选型**。若本次仅补\"文档协同 / 权限 / 管道\"其中一块，按上表对位评估；若三块都缺，建议**分别纳入而非互斥**，三者能力并不重叠。\n2. **活跃度 +", + "think_stripped": true +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-08.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-08.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..24510754 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-08.json @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +{ + "task": "rc-08", + "family": "research-compare", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "risk", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 2618, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 518, + "completion_tokens": 2100, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 21.93 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "```markdown\n# 风控评审 · 风险分析页\n\n> 风险条目按严重度组织；标注【来源】的为材料原文，标注【分析】的为本助手基于材料数据的推论，非供应商或备忘官方结论。\n\n---\n\n## 🔴 高严重度\n\n| # | 风险 | 来源 | 材料依据 | 我的判断 |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| H-1 | **性能未验证** | 【doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo】 | 备忘标\"性能未验证（高）\"，指出万行表格场景无官方基准 | 【分析】三款工具中 EchoDocs 主打文档协同，最可能承载该场景；其近半年仅发布 2 次、迭代最慢，建议在选型前由我方自建基准测试，而非依赖厂商补发报告 |\n\n---\n\n## 🟡 中严重度\n\n| # | 风险 | 来源 | 材料依据 | 我的判断 |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| M-1 | **供应商锁定** | 【doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo】 | 备忘标\"供应商锁定（中）\"，私有 API 占比 40% | 【分析】40% 私有 API 意味着近一半集成不可直接替换；建议合同条款要求 API 文档完整交付，并由我方保留一层适配封装 |\n\n---\n\n## 🟢 低严重度\n\n| # | 风险 | 来源 | 材料依据 | 我的判断 |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| L-1 | **培训成本** | 【doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo】 | 备忘标\"培训成本（低）\"，界面术语与现有系统不一致 | 【分析】低严重度可控；建议预留上线前约 2 周过渡期，配套术语对照表与一次集中培训 |\n\n---\n\n## 🧭 【分析】派生观察（非备忘原文，基于供应商资料推导）\n\n以下条目为本人对三份供应商数据的二次解读，原始备忘未单列：\n\n| # | 观察 | 派生自 | 推论 |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| D-1 | VaultKeep 平均修复周期 4 天，且 2022-08 才上线 | 【doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2】 | 【分析】承权限中枢角色但响应偏慢，建议 SLA 中将 P0 故障修复时长单独约定为 ≤ 24h |\n| D-2 | EchoDocs 近半年仅发布 2 次 | 【doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3】 | 【分析】迭代活跃度在三者中最低，若文档协同为业务关键路径，需评估厂商长期投入意愿 |\n| D-3 | LarkPipe 近半年发布 7 次、平均修复 2 天 | 【doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1】 | 【分析】响应快但改动密度高，回归测试压力较大；CI 上需对消息路由与模板变量路径加强覆盖 |\n| D-4 | VaultKeep 报价 ¥15/人/天，约为 LarkPipe 的 3 倍 | 【doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2】 vs 【doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1】 | 【分析】在权限类工具中价差需结合国密合规溢价评估；引入规模估算后可量化 TCO |\n| D-5 | LarkPipe 仅 SaaS、EchoDocs 无离线 | 【doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1】【vendor3】 | 【分析】若业务存在网络隔离或离线办公场景，两款部署形态受限，备忘未单列，建议评审会上确认合规要求 |\n\n---\n\n## 📎 数据来源\n- 【doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1】LarkPipe\n- 【doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2】VaultKeep\n- 【doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3】EchoDocs\n- 【doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo】尽调风险备忘\n```", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 21.9, + "raw_markdown": "The user wants a risk analysis page for a risk control review, organizing risks by severity, labeling each risk's source, and indicating my judgment. The materials provide vendor info for three tools and a risk memo with three risks.\n\nLet me organize:\n\n**Risk Memo Risks (from internal due diligence):**\n1. 性能未验证（高） - Performance unverified (High) - no official benchmarks for 10K-row table scenarios\n2. 培训成本（低） - Training cost (Low) - UI terminology inconsistent with existing systems\n3. 供应商锁定（中） - Vendor lock-in (Medium) - proprietary API accounts for 40%\n\nThe source for these is 【doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo】.\n\nLet me also check if there are implicit risks from vendor data that I should mention in my analytical judgment:\n\n- **LarkPipe**: Average fix cycle 2 days, 7 releases in 6 months - high release frequency, but short fix cycle\n- **VaultKeep**: Launched 2022-08 (newer), fix cycle 4 days (longer), supports 国密 - newer vendor, longer fix cycle\n- **EchoDocs**: 2 releases in 6 months (low activity), fix cycle 1 day (shortest), no offline capability\n\nI should organize by severity. The memo gives one high, one medium, one low. I can note these and add analytical observations.\n\nLet me think about how to format this as a Markdown card for risk review.\n\nThe card should:\n1. Be organized by severity (高/中/低)\n2. Label source of each risk\n3. Label my judgment as analysis\n\nI should structure it with:\n- Header\n- High severity risks\n- Medium severity risks \n- Low severity risks\n- Summary/source notes\n\nLet me draft:\n\n```\n# 风控评审 · 风险分析页\n\n> 风险条目来源于内部尽调备忘及三份供应商资料；判断标注为【分析】的均为本人推论，非材料原文结论。\n\n## 🔴 高严重度风险\n\n| # | 风险描述 | 来源 | 触发条件/数据 | 我的判断 |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| H-1 | **性能未验证**：万行表格场景无官方基准 | 【doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo】 | 备忘标 \"性能未验证（高）\" | 【分析】三类供应商中 EchoDocs 涉及文档协同，最可能承载表格场景；但其近半年仅发布 2 次，节奏最慢，性能验证或需我方自建基准测试 |\n\n## 🟡 中严重度风险\n\n| # | 风险描述 | 来源 | 触发条件/数据 | 我的判断 |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| M-1 | **供应商锁定**：私有 API 占比 40% | 【doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo】 | 备忘标 \"供应商锁定（中）\" | 【分析】40% 私有 API 意味着近一半集成不可替换；建议在采购合同中要求 API 文档完整交付，并保留抽象层封装 |\n\n## 🟢 低严重度风险\n\n| # | 风险描述 | 来源 | 触发条件/数据 | 我的判断 |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| L-1 | **培训成本**：界面术语与现有系统不一致 | 【doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo】 | 备忘标 \"培训成本（低）\" | 【分析】低严重度，可通过术语对照表与一次集中培训吸收，建议预留上线前 2 周过渡期 |\n\n## 【分析】补充观察：来自供应商资料的派生风险\n\n以下非备忘原文，基于材料中供应商数据推导：\n\n- **VaultKeep 修复周期偏长**：平均 4 天 + 上线于 2022-08（成立较新），对于权限类关键链路而言，响应时效存在不确定性。建议在 SLA 中将 P0 故障修复时长单独约定。\n- **EchoDocs 迭代活跃度低**：近半年仅 2 次发布，若文档协同为业务关键路径，需评估厂商长期投入度。\n- **LarkPipe 修复节奏快但发布频繁**：近半年 7 次发布，平均修复 2 天；改动密度高意味着回归测试压力较大。\n\n## 数据来源汇总\n- 【doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1】LarkPipe\n- 【doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2】VaultKeep\n- 【doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3】EchoDocs\n- 【doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo】尽调风险备忘\n```\n\nThis looks good. Let me refine it a bit. I want to make sure I'm using only facts from the materials and clearly labeling analysis.\n\nOne consideration: should the derived risks from vendor data be included? The user asked for \"把风险按严重度组织，标注每条风险的来源与你的判断\" - organize by severity, label source and judgment. I think showing the memo risks by severity is the core ask, and adding derived observations helps the risk review. But I should make it clear these are my analytical additions.\n\nLet me also think: are there any other risks I might be missing? Let me re-check:\n- LarkPipe: SaaS only deployment, ¥5/人/天 - no special risk\n- VaultKeep: 国密支持 (good), ¥15/人/天 - 3x LarkPipe price, could be cost concern\n- EchoDocs: 无离线 (no offline) - this is a deployment limitation\n\nActually \"无离线\" and \"仅 SaaS\" are deployment limitations that could be risks in regulated environments, but the memo doesn't flag these. I'll mention them briefly as derived observations.\n\nLet me finalize the card. I should also think about whether to include the VaultKeep pricing as a risk... ¥15/人/天 vs ¥5 and ¥9 - that's 3x the cheapest. Could be budget concern. But without team size info, hard to quantify. I'll note it as analysis.\n\nFinal structure:\n1. Title and intro\n2. High severity (1 item from memo + maybe derived)\n3. Medium severity (1 item from memo + maybe derived) \n4. Low severity (1 item from memo)\n5. Analysis section for derived risks\n6. Source summary\n\nLet me write the final version.\n\n```markdown\n# 风控评审 · 风险分析页\n\n> 风险条目按严重度组织；标注【来源】的为材料原文，标注【分析】的为本助手基于材料数据的推论，非供应商或备忘官方结论。\n\n---\n\n## 🔴 高严重度\n\n| # | 风险 | 来源 | 材料依据 | 我的判断 |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| H-1 | **性能未验证** | 【doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo】 | 备忘标\"性能未验证（高）\"，指出万行表格场景无官方基准 | 【分析】三款工具中 EchoDocs 主打文档协同，最可能承载该场景；其近半年仅发布 2 次、迭代最慢，建议在选型前由我方自建基准测试，而非依赖厂商补发报告 |\n\n---\n\n## 🟡 中严重度\n\n| # | 风险 | 来源 | 材料依据 | 我的判断 |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| M-1 | **供应商锁定** | 【doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo】 | 备忘标\"供应商锁定（中）\"，私有 API 占比 40% | 【分析】40% 私有 API 意味着近一半集成不可直接替换；建议合同条款要求 API 文档完整交付，并由我方保留一层适配封装 |\n\n---\n\n## 🟢 低严重度\n\n| # | 风险 | 来源 | 材料依据 | 我的判断 |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| L-1 | **培训成本** | 【doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo】 | 备忘标\"培训成本（低）\"，界面术语与现有系统不一致 | 【分析】低严重度可控；建议预留上线前约 2 周过渡期，配套术语对照表与一次集中培训 |\n\n---\n\n## 🧭 【分析】派生观察（非备忘原文，基于供应商资料推导）\n\n以下条目为本人对三份供应商数据的二次解读，原始备忘未单列：\n\n| # | 观察 | 派生自 | 推论 |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| D-1 | VaultKeep 平均修复周期 4 天，且 2022-08 才上线 | 【doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2】 | 【分析】承权限中枢角色但响应偏慢，建议 SLA 中将 P0 故障修复时长单独约定为 ≤ 24h |\n| D-2 | EchoDocs 近半年仅发布 2 次 | 【doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3】 | 【分析】迭代活跃度在三者中最低，若文档协同为业务关键路径，需评估厂商长期投入意愿 |\n| D-3 | LarkPipe 近半年发布 7 次、平均修复 2 天 | 【doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1】 | 【分析】响应快但改动密度高，回归测试压力较大；CI 上需对消息路由与模板变量路径加强覆盖 |\n| D-4 | VaultKeep 报价 ¥15/人/天，约为 LarkPipe 的 3 倍 | 【doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2】 vs 【doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1】 | 【分析】在权限类工具中价差需结合国密合规溢价评估；引入规模估算后可量化 TCO |\n| D-5 | LarkPipe 仅 SaaS、EchoDocs 无离线 | 【doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1】【vendor3】 | 【分析】若业务存在网络隔离或离线办公场景，两款部署形态受限，备忘未单列，建议评审会上确认合规要求 |\n\n---\n\n## 📎 数据来源\n- 【doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1】LarkPipe\n- 【doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2】VaultKeep\n- 【doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3】EchoDocs\n- 【doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo】尽调风险备忘\n```", + "think_stripped": true +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-09.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-09.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..c3458114 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-09.json @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +{ + "task": "rc-09", + "family": "research-compare", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "order", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 2121, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 508, + "completion_tokens": 1613, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 17.53 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "## 实施顺序规划（评审后分阶段方案）\n\n> 说明：以下判断依据尽调风险备忘给出建议，并已在分析处注明；里程碑日期需结合实际项目排期调整。\n\n---\n\n### 🔧 阶段 0｜风险缓解前置（建议 1–2 周）\n\n- **应对性能高风险** *(分析)*：万行表格场景尚无官方基准，需在 POC 阶段自建压测方案；针对 EchoDocs 的\"无离线\"部署形态（事实），必须先验证内网弱网条件下的可用性。\n- **应对供应商锁定中风险** *(分析)*：私有 API 占比 40%（事实），前期应统一封装访问层、记录所有私有接口清单，为后续可替换性留出口。\n- **应对培训低成本风险** *(分析)*：提前梳理与现有系统不一致的界面术语，准备术语对照手册。\n\n📍 **里程碑 M0**：风险应对清单签署，私有 API 适配层 PoC 通过。\n\n---\n\n### 🔐 阶段 1｜权限底座先行（VaultKeep 上线）\n\n- **Why-first 分析**：权限中枢（RBAC / 临时令牌 / 密钥轮换）是后续系统身份与访问的基础设施，宜先于业务系统上线。\n- **部署要点**（事实）：\n - 国密支持 — 满足合规要求。\n - 平均修复周期 4 天、最近半年发布 4 次 *(分析)*：变更频率中等，建议锁定版本并规划季度升级窗口。\n- **依赖**：阶段 0 的 API 适配层就绪。\n\n📍 **里程碑 M1**：VaultKeep 完成组织架构 / 角色矩阵配置，对试点系统开放鉴权。\n\n---\n\n### 📨 阶段 2｜消息管道接入（LarkPipe 上线）\n\n- **依赖**：VaultKeep 已提供统一鉴权 *(分析)*，避免每条 webhook 单独管理凭据。\n- **部署要点**（事实）：\n - 仅 SaaS — 需确认网络出口与数据合规边界 *(分析)*：审批流程要在上线前完成。\n - 近半年发布 7 次、修复周期 2 天 *(分析)*：迭代活跃、修复快，可保持 minor 版本自动升级策略。\n- **接入范围**：先在 1–2 个非核心业务验证 Webhook 路由、重试与模板变量能力。\n\n📍 **里程碑 M2**：试点业务事件流跑通，丢包率与重试行为达到预期。\n\n---\n\n### 📝 阶段 3｜文档协同铺开（EchoDocs 上线）\n\n- **依赖**：VaultKeep（权限）、LarkPipe（变更通知通道）已就绪 *(分析)*，便于把版本链变更通过消息管道广播。\n- **部署要点**（事实）：\n - 无离线形态 *(分析)*：所有访问需在线，建议先在\"文档需求高、网络稳定的团队\"灰度。\n - 修复周期 1 天、发布节奏较低（半年 2 次） *(分析)*：稳定性较好，但需关注长期演进是否活跃。\n- **配套**：落实阶段 0 的术语对照手册，降低培训摩擦。\n\n📍 **里程碑 M3**：灰度团队上线，全员切换前完成批注 / 版本链 / 全文检索三项核心能力验收。\n\n---\n\n### 🔁 阶段 4｜稳态与退出预案\n\n- 监控：三项工具的修复周期与发布频率是否变化。\n- **供应商锁定复盘** *(分析)*：基于阶段 0 沉淀的适配层，定期评估私有 API 占比是否下降。\n- 年度回溯：若任一工具停更或涨价超阈值，启动替代选型。\n\n📍 **里程碑 M4**：稳态运行 90 天，替代候选池建立。\n\n---\n\n### 📌 依赖关系一览\n\n```\n阶段 0 (风险/适配层)\n └─► 阶段 1 VaultKeep ──┬─► 阶段 2 LarkPipe\n └─► 阶段 3 EchoDocs ──► 阶段 4 稳态\n```\n\n> 注：阶段 2 与阶段 3 顺序可按业务紧迫度互换（LarkPipe 发布更频繁、可先行验证迭代节奏；EchoDocs 修复最快、风险敞口更小）。**以上排序属分析建议**，最终需结合贵方业务优先级与合规时点定夺。", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 17.5, + "raw_markdown": "The user wants me to create a Markdown card that plans the implementation sequence after a review, listing phased steps, dependencies, and milestones. I need to use only facts from the provided materials about three vendors: LarkPipe, VaultKeep, EchoDocs, plus the risk memo.\n\nLet me analyze the materials:\n\n**Vendor facts:**\n1. **LarkPipe** (消息管道): 2019-03 上线, Webhook路由/重试策略/模板变量, ¥5/人/天, 仅SaaS, 近半年发布7次, 修复周期2天\n2. **VaultKeep** (权限中枢): 2022-08 上线, RBAC/临时令牌/密钥轮换, ¥15/人/天, 国密支持, 近半年发布4次, 修复周期4天\n3. **EchoDocs** (文档协同): 2020-06 上线, 批注/版本链/全文检索, ¥9/人/天, 无离线, 近半年发布2次, 修复周期1天\n\n**Risk memo:**\n- 性能未验证（高）：万行表格场景无官方基准\n- 培训成本（低）：界面术语与现有系统不一致\n- 供应商锁定（中）：私有API占比40%\n\nNow, I need to plan an implementation sequence. The user wants phased steps, dependencies, and milestones.\n\nLet me think about a logical implementation order based on the materials:\n\nThe materials don't explicitly say which to implement first, so I need to make analytical judgments and clearly mark them as analysis.\n\nReasoning for sequencing (analytical):\n- 权限/安全类（VaultKeep）通常应该先于业务系统上线，因为后续系统需要权限管控\n- 但是 VaultKeep 是2022年上线最晚，且修复周期4天相对最长\n- LarkPipe 消息管道往往是基础设施类，可在权限之后或并行\n- EchoDocs 文档协同通常是上层应用\n\n合理阶段化建议：\n\n**阶段0: 风险缓解准备**\n- 针对高风险项（性能未验证）与供应商锁定（私有API 40%）进行应对\n\n**阶段1: 权限底座优先**\n- 先部署 VaultKeep，因为：\n - 权限中枢是其他系统接入的身份基础（分析判断）\n - 国密支持满足合规要求（事实）\n\n**阶段2: 消息管道与试点**\n- 部署 LarkPipe\n - 修复周期短（2天），发布频繁（7次），迭代风险相对低（分析）\n - 但要监控\"仅SaaS\"对网络环境的影响（事实衍生的分析）\n\n**阶段3: 文档协同**\n- 部署 EchoDocs\n - 修复周期最短（1天），但近半年发布仅2次（事实）\n - \"无离线\"是潜在约束，需提前确认（事实）\n\n依赖关系：\n- VaultKeep → LarkPipe（消息管道需要权限系统鉴权，分析）\n- VaultKeep → EchoDocs（文档系统需要权限管控，分析）\n- 风险应对完成 → 正式上线\n\n里程碑：\n- M1: POC验证完成（针对高风险性能）\n- M2: 权限底座上线\n- M3: 消息通道打通\n- M4: 文档协同全量上线\n- M5: 锁定期评估与迁移预案\n\n让我用Markdown卡片格式组织，并且口语化标明分析判断。卡片应该简洁清晰。\n\nLet me draft this now. The response should be a Markdown card, no extra explanation.\n\n## 实施顺序规划（评审后分阶段方案）\n\n> 说明：以下判断依据尽调风险备忘给出建议，并已在分析处注明；里程碑日期需结合实际项目排期调整。\n\n---\n\n### 🔧 阶段 0｜风险缓解前置（建议 1–2 周）\n\n- **应对性能高风险** *(分析)*：万行表格场景尚无官方基准，需在 POC 阶段自建压测方案；针对 EchoDocs 的\"无离线\"部署形态（事实），必须先验证内网弱网条件下的可用性。\n- **应对供应商锁定中风险** *(分析)*：私有 API 占比 40%（事实），前期应统一封装访问层、记录所有私有接口清单，为后续可替换性留出口。\n- **应对培训低成本风险** *(分析)*：提前梳理与现有系统不一致的界面术语，准备术语对照手册。\n\n📍 **里程碑 M0**：风险应对清单签署，私有 API 适配层 PoC 通过。\n\n---\n\n### 🔐 阶段 1｜权限底座先行（VaultKeep 上线）\n\n- **Why-first 分析**：权限中枢（RBAC / 临时令牌 / 密钥轮换）是后续系统身份与访问的基础设施，宜先于业务系统上线。\n- **部署要点**（事实）：\n - 国密支持 — 满足合规要求。\n - 平均修复周期 4 天、最近半年发布 4 次 *(分析)*：变更频率中等，建议锁定版本并规划季度升级窗口。\n- **依赖**：阶段 0 的 API 适配层就绪。\n\n📍 **里程碑 M1**：VaultKeep 完成组织架构 / 角色矩阵配置，对试点系统开放鉴权。\n\n---\n\n### 📨 阶段 2｜消息管道接入（LarkPipe 上线）\n\n- **依赖**：VaultKeep 已提供统一鉴权 *(分析)*，避免每条 webhook 单独管理凭据。\n- **部署要点**（事实）：\n - 仅 SaaS — 需确认网络出口与数据合规边界 *(分析)*：审批流程要在上线前完成。\n - 近半年发布 7 次、修复周期 2 天 *(分析)*：迭代活跃、修复快，可保持 minor 版本自动升级策略。\n- **接入范围**：先在 1–2 个非核心业务验证 Webhook 路由、重试与模板变量能力。\n\n📍 **里程碑 M2**：试点业务事件流跑通，丢包率与重试行为达到预期。\n\n---\n\n### 📝 阶段 3｜文档协同铺开（EchoDocs 上线）\n\n- **依赖**：VaultKeep（权限）、LarkPipe（变更通知通道）已就绪 *(分析)*，便于把版本链变更通过消息管道广播。\n- **部署要点**（事实）：\n - 无离线形态 *(分析)*：所有访问需在线，建议先在\"文档需求高、网络稳定的团队\"灰度。\n - 修复周期 1 天、发布节奏较低（半年 2 次） *(分析)*：稳定性较好，但需关注长期演进是否活跃。\n- **配套**：落实阶段 0 的术语对照手册，降低培训摩擦。\n\n📍 **里程碑 M3**：灰度团队上线，全员切换前完成批注 / 版本链 / 全文检索三项核心能力验收。\n\n---\n\n### 🔁 阶段 4｜稳态与退出预案\n\n- 监控：三项工具的修复周期与发布频率是否变化。\n- **供应商锁定复盘** *(分析)*：基于阶段 0 沉淀的适配层，定期评估私有 API 占比是否下降。\n- 年度回溯：若任一工具停更或涨价超阈值，启动替代选型。\n\n📍 **里程碑 M4**：稳态运行 90 天，替代候选池建立。\n\n---\n\n### 📌 依赖关系一览\n\n```\n阶段 0 (风险/适配层)\n └─► 阶段 1 VaultKeep ──┬─► 阶段 2 LarkPipe\n └─► 阶段 3 EchoDocs ──► 阶段 4 稳态\n```\n\n> 注：阶段 2 与阶段 3 顺序可按业务紧迫度互换（LarkPipe 发布更频繁、可先行验证迭代节奏；EchoDocs 修复最快、风险敞口更小）。**以上排序属分析建议**，最终需结合贵方业务优先级与合规时点定夺。", + "think_stripped": true +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-10.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-10.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..3f60ba04 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/rc-10.json @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +{ + "task": "rc-10", + "family": "research-compare", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "risk", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 1513, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 517, + "completion_tokens": 996, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 0 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 0 + } + }, + "latency_s": 12.75 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "# 风控评审 · 风险分析页\n\n## 🔴 高风险\n\n### 性能未验证\n- **来源**：`doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo`\n- **事实**：万行表格场景无官方基准。\n- **关联产品**：NexusGrid（vendor2），核心能力包含虚拟滚动，但材料未披露其在大数据量下的实测数据。【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor2】\n- **分析**：作为数据表格类工具，万行场景是高频使用边界，缺乏官方基准意味着性能承诺尚未被独立验证，建议要求厂商补充压测报告或纳入试点验证后再评估。\n\n---\n\n## 🟡 中风险\n\n### 升级断层\n- **来源**：`doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo`\n- **事实**：近两季度仅小版本。\n- **关联产品**：三家产品近半年发布次数分别为 4、6、6 次【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor1】【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor2】【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor3】，从发布频次看不出明显断层，需进一步索取版本号级差异明细。\n- **分析**：仅\"小版本\"可能意味着重大架构或安全更新停滞；若属于权限类工具（VaultKeep）则风险放大，建议核实各产品近两季度 changelog 中是否含架构级或安全级变更。\n\n---\n\n## 🟢 低风险\n\n### 培训成本\n- **来源**：`doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo`\n- **事实**：界面术语与现有系统不一致。\n- **分析**：属于使用摩擦类风险，影响范围有限，可通过内部术语对照表或培训手册覆盖，不构成准入阻塞。\n\n---\n\n## 附：分析补充观察（未在备忘中，由材料事实推导）\n\n> 以下为基于材料事实的判断，非尽调备忘原文，仅供参考。\n\n| 观察点 | 事实依据 | 判断 |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| 修复周期差异 | VaultKeep 平均修复周期 5 天，EchoDocs/NexusGrid 均为 3 天【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor1】【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor2】【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor3】 | **分析**：权限类工具对响应时效更敏感，5 天修复周期属可接受范围但偏长，建议在 SLA 中明确高危漏洞修复时限。 |\n| 部署形态差异 | EchoDocs 无离线；NexusGrid 私有化可选；VaultKeep 国密支持【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor1】【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor2】【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor3】 | **分析**：若客户环境为内网或涉密场景，EchoDocs 无离线部署将直接不可用，VaultKeep 国密支持是加分项。 |\n| 报价区间 | ¥9–¥15/人/天，价差约 67% | **分析**：需结合实际采购人数与是否含私有化/国密溢价综合评估单价合理性，材料未给出折扣梯度，无法定论。 |", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 12.8, + "raw_markdown": "The user wants a risk analysis page for a risk control review. I need to organize risks by severity, label each risk's source, and clearly mark my own analysis/judgment.\n\nLet me extract the risks from the risk memo:\n1. 升级断层（中）：近两季度仅小版本 - Source: doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo\n2. 性能未验证（高）：万行表格场景无官方基准 - Source: doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo\n3. 培训成本（低）：界面术语与现有系统不一致 - Source: doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo\n\nI should also consider whether there are other risks I can derive from the vendor data based on the materials. Let me check:\n\n- Vendor3 (VaultKeep) 平均修复周期5天，比其他两家（3天）长，这可能与安全类工具相关，是分析判断。\n- Vendor2 (NexusGrid) 报价¥12/人/天，是数据表格类工具，与万行表格性能问题直接相关。\n- Vendor1 (EchoDocs) 没有明显新风险点。\n\nThe user asked specifically to organize risks by severity, label source and judgment. I should keep this focused on the risks in the memo, since those are the official risk items. But I can add analytical observations based on material facts.\n\nLet me structure this as a Markdown card:\n\nThe format should be a Markdown card. I'll use headers/structure appropriate for a risk review page.\n\nI need to:\n1. Use only facts from materials - don't fabricate\n2. Mark my judgments as analysis (口头标明是分析)\n3. Output is the card body itself, no extra explanation\n\nLet me organize by severity (高 > 中 > 低):\n\n# 风控评审 · 风险分析页\n\n## 🔴 高风险\n\n### 性能未验证\n- **来源**：`doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo`\n- **事实**：万行表格场景无官方基准。\n- **关联产品**：NexusGrid（vendor2），核心能力包含虚拟滚动，但材料未披露其在大数据量下的实测数据。【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor2】\n- **分析**：作为数据表格类工具，万行场景是高频使用边界，缺乏官方基准意味着性能承诺尚未被独立验证，建议要求厂商补充压测报告或纳入试点验证后再评估。\n\n---\n\n## 🟡 中风险\n\n### 升级断层\n- **来源**：`doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo`\n- **事实**：近两季度仅小版本。\n- **关联产品**：三家产品近半年发布次数分别为 4、6、6 次【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor1】【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor2】【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor3】，从发布频次看不出明显断层，需进一步索取版本号级差异明细。\n- **分析**：仅\"小版本\"可能意味着重大架构或安全更新停滞；若属于权限类工具（VaultKeep）则风险放大，建议核实各产品近两季度 changelog 中是否含架构级或安全级变更。\n\n---\n\n## 🟢 低风险\n\n### 培训成本\n- **来源**：`doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo`\n- **事实**：界面术语与现有系统不一致。\n- **分析**：属于使用摩擦类风险，影响范围有限，可通过内部术语对照表或培训手册覆盖，不构成准入阻塞。\n\n---\n\n## 附：分析补充观察（未在备忘中，由材料事实推导）\n\n> 以下为基于材料事实的判断，非尽调备忘原文，仅供参考。\n\n| 观察点 | 事实依据 | 判断 |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| 修复周期差异 | VaultKeep 平均修复周期 5 天，EchoDocs/NexusGrid 均为 3 天【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor1】【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor2】【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor3】 | **分析**：权限类工具对响应时效更敏感，5 天修复周期属可接受范围但偏长，建议在 SLA 中明确高危漏洞修复时限。 |\n| 部署形态差异 | EchoDocs 无离线；NexusGrid 私有化可选；VaultKeep 国密支持【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor1】【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor2】【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor3】 | **分析**：若客户环境为内网或涉密场景，EchoDocs 无离线部署将直接不可用，VaultKeep 国密支持是加分项。 |\n| 报价区间 | ¥9–¥15/人/天，价差约 67% | **分析**：需结合实际采购人数与是否含私有化/国密溢价综合评估单价合理性，材料未给出折扣梯度，无法定论。 |", + "think_stripped": true +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-01.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-01.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..fcd4ccd7 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-01.json @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +{ + "task": "ri-01", + "family": "requirement-input", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "collect", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 2792, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 397, + "completion_tokens": 2395, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 2061 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 30.65 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "# 待决问题收集表单\n\n> 数据来源：【req:eval/ri-00/open】待决问题清单（4 项） \n> 用途：把上述问题组织为可填写的表单页，一次性收集完成。\n\n---\n\n**填写说明**：题号后带 `*` 为必填；选项均来自原清单；\"待定\"为分析补充，便于原选项无法直接决策时使用。\n\n---\n\n### Q1 * 供应商是否要求驻场实施？\n- ☐ 是 \n- ☐ 否 \n- ☐ 待定（分析补充）\n\n### Q2 * 并发审批上限\n- ☐ 50 \n- ☐ 200 \n- ☐ 待定（分析补充）\n\n### Q3 * 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度？\n- ☐ 允许 \n- ☐ 不允许 \n- ☐ 待定（分析补充）\n\n### Q4 * 验收标准由谁签署？\n- ☐ 财务 \n- ☐ 行政 \n- ☐ 待定（分析补充）\n\n---\n\n**填写信息**\n- 填写人：________________ \n- 填写日期：____ / ____ / ____ \n- 关联背景（来自【req:eval/ri-00/context】）：预算上限 40 万 / 期望 Q1 上线 / 审批链最多 5 级 / 历史数据只读归档 / 保留移动端入口\n\n---\n\n> *备注（分析）：4 项全部标记为必填，依据是用户目标\"一次收集完\"——任一项缺失都需再次回访，建议每一题都给出明确答复后再汇总。*", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 30.6 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-02.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-02.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b0b56dae --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-02.json @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +{ + "task": "ri-02", + "family": "requirement-input", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "confirm", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 2246, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 394, + "completion_tokens": 1852, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 1298 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 40.4 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "# 审批系统合并 · 范围确认页\n\n> **项目**：内部审批两套并行系统 → 合并为一套 ｜ 预算 ≤ 40 万 ｜ 期望 Q1 上线\n\n---\n\n## 一、已定约束（确认或提异议）\n\n| # | 约束项 | 出处 |\n|---|---|---|\n| C1 | 合并对象：内部审批（两套并行 → 一套） | 背景 |\n| C2 | 预算上限 **40 万** | 背景 |\n| C3 | 目标上线 **Q1** | 背景 |\n| C4 | 保留**移动端**入口 | 已定 |\n| C5 | 审批链**最多 5 级** | 已定 |\n| C6 | 历史数据**只读归档**（不迁移写入） | 已定 |\n| C7 | 干系人分工：财务=审批人 / 行政=发起人 / IT=运维 / 法务=事后复核合同 | 背景 |\n\n## 二、待决事项（需逐项拍板）\n\n| # | 待决问题 | 选项 | 我的分析（仅供参考，非材料事实） |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| O1 | 旧系统下线窗口**是否允许跨季度**？ | ①允许 ②不允许 | 跨季度意味着两套系统并行期拉长，会增加 IT 运维负担；具体风险需结合数据迁移复杂度评估，材料未提供 |\n| O2 | **并发审批上限**：50 还是 200？ | ①50 ②200 | 两者差距 4 倍，需历史峰值并发数据支撑；材料未提供峰值数据，无法判断 |\n| O3 | **归档年限**：3 年 还是 5 年？ | ①3 年 ②5 年 | 法务负责\"事后复核合同\"，但材料未给复核周期；归档年限需先与法务对齐复核要求 |\n| O4 | **供应商是否要求驻场**实施？ | ①驻场 ②非驻场 ③混合 | 驻场会增加人力费用，可能挤压 40 万预算；具体预算占比材料未给 |\n\n## 三、缺失信息提示（建议补齐后再拍板 O2、O3）\n\n- 历史审批**峰值并发数**（用于 O2）\n- 法务**合同复核追溯周期**（用于 O3）\n- 供应商**报价结构**与驻场溢价（用于 O4）\n\n---\n\n### ✍️ 确认栏\n\n请逐项回执：\n- **C1–C7**：✅ 接受 / ❌ 异议（请注明编号与原因）\n- **O1–O4**：请圈定选项编号", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 40.4, + "raw_markdown": "The user wants a one-page range/scope page that separates confirmed constraints from pending items. They want to be able to confirm item by item.\n\nLet me organize:\n\n**Confirmed (已定约束):**\n- 把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套 (consolidate two parallel systems into one) — Wait, this is in the context. Is this confirmed or just the background? Reading again: \"背景：把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套\" — this is the background/intent. But it's not in the \"已定\" list explicitly. The \"已定\" list says:\n - 保留移动端入口\n - 审批链最多 5 级\n - 历史数据只读归档\n - 预算上限 40 万 (this is in background)\n - 期望 Q1 上线 (this is in background)\n\nHmm, I need to be careful. The background gives the intent but the \"已定\" section explicitly marks what's decided. However, budget and timeline are also clearly stated as constraints. Let me re-read.\n\n\"背景：把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套，预算上限 40 万，期望 Q1 上线。\"\n\nThis is background context. It contains the project goal and key parameters. Then:\n\"已定：保留移动端入口；审批链最多 5 级；历史数据只读归档。\"\n\nThese are explicitly marked as decided.\n\nI should probably include both in \"已定\" since they are presented as fixed constraints. But strictly speaking, the material marks only three things as \"已定\". The background info (budget, timeline, consolidation goal) is more like project framing.\n\nI'll treat the explicit \"已定\" as confirmed scope, and the background parameters (budget, timeline, goal) as project framing/baseline that's been set but listed with the target as a baseline reference. Actually, let me think — budget and Q1 launch are also firm constraints the user needs to acknowledge. I'll list them under confirmed constraints as well.\n\n**Pending (待决事项):**\n- 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度？\n- 并发审批上限：50 还是 200？\n- 归档年限未定：3 年还是 5 年？\n- 供应商是否要求驻场实施？\n\nThe user wants:\n1. Confirmed constraints and pending items separated\n2. One page that allows item-by-item confirmation\n\nI should present this clearly with checkboxes or confirmation markers so the user can tick items. A Markdown table or checklist format would work well.\n\nLet me draft:\n\n---\n\n# 内部审批系统合并项目 · 范围确认页\n\n## 一、已定约束（需确认是否无异议）\n\n| 编号 | 约束项 | 来源 |\n|---|---|---|\n| C1 | 合并对象：内部审批（两套并行系统合并为一套） | 背景 |\n| C2 | 预算上限：40 万 | 背景 |\n| C3 | 目标上线时间：Q1 | 背景 |\n| C4 | 保留移动端入口 | 已定 |\n| C5 | 审批链最多 5 级 | 已定 |\n| C6 | 历史数据只读归档 | 已定 |\n| C7 | 干系人分工（财务=审批方，行政=发起方，IT=运维，法务=事后复核合同） | 背景 |\n\n## 二、待决事项（需逐项拍板）\n\n| 编号 | 待决问题 | 选项 | 建议分析 |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| O1 | 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度？ | 是 / 否 | 分析：跨季度切换会拉长并行期，IT 运维成本上升，但能降低一次性切换风险；具体取决于新旧数据迁移复杂度（无材料信息支持判断）。 |\n| O2 | 并发审批上限 | 50 / 200 | 分析：差异巨大，需结合历史峰值并发数据评估。50 成本低但可能成瓶颈，200 缓冲充足但成本上升（无材料信息支持判断）。 |\n| O3 | 归档年限 | 3 年 / 5 年 | 分析：3 年合规成本低、存储省；5 年留痕更完整、便于法务事后复核（法务复核周期未知，需对齐）。 |\n| O4 | 供应商实施方式 | 驻场 / 非驻场 | 分析：驻场响应快、沟通成本低，但增加供应商费用，可能挤压 40 万预算；非驻场成本友好但风险自担（具体预算占比无材料信息）。 |\n\n## 三、确认区\n\n请逐项回复：\n- C1–C7：✅ 接受 / ❌ 异议（注明原因）\n- O1–O4：选择选项 + 是否需要补充材料\n\n---\n\nLet me refine this. The user asked for a single-page scope confirmation page. Let me make it more compact and useful.\n\nActually, the user wants \"一页能逐项确认的范围页\" — a one-page scope page that can be confirmed item by item. Let me ensure it's truly one-page and has clear confirmation mechanism.\n\nLet me also note: the system says \"你的判断与建议需口头标明是分析\" — my judgment and suggestions need to be verbally marked as analysis. So I should use \"分析：\" prefix or similar.\n\nAlso: \"只使用材料中的事实，不要编造\" — only use facts from materials, don't fabricate. So I should not invent analysis like \"50 成本低\" without basis — I should flag that there's no material info supporting the judgment.\n\nLet me revise to be more careful with the analysis labels:\n\nFor O1: I can note that cross-quarter means longer parallel operation → more IT ops cost. This is a logical inference, not fabrication. But specifics need material I don't have.\n\nFor O2: I shouldn't fabricate cost numbers. Just note \"需结合历史峰值数据评估，无材料支持具体判断\".\n\nFor O3: 5-year retention supports legal review; but no material on legal review requirements. \n\nFor O4: on-site = higher cost, may squeeze 40万 budget. This is a logical implication.\n\nLet me also add a stakeholder cross-check reminder since the user is consolidating from 2 systems.\n\nLet me finalize the card:\n\nFormat: a single page with two clear sections + confirmation footer.\n\n# 审批系统合并 · 范围确认页\n\n> **项目**：内部审批两套并行系统 → 合并为一套 ｜ 预算 ≤ 40 万 ｜ 期望 Q1 上线\n\n---\n\n## 一、已定约束（确认或提异议）\n\n| # | 约束项 | 出处 |\n|---|---|---|\n| C1 | 合并对象：内部审批（两套并行 → 一套） | 背景 |\n| C2 | 预算上限 **40 万** | 背景 |\n| C3 | 目标上线 **Q1** | 背景 |\n| C4 | 保留**移动端**入口 | 已定 |\n| C5 | 审批链**最多 5 级** | 已定 |\n| C6 | 历史数据**只读归档**（不迁移写入） | 已定 |\n| C7 | 干系人分工：财务=审批人 / 行政=发起人 / IT=运维 / 法务=事后复核合同 | 背景 |\n\n## 二、待决事项（需逐项拍板）\n\n| # | 待决问题 | 选项 | 我的分析（仅供参考，非材料事实） |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| O1 | 旧系统下线窗口**是否允许跨季度**？ | ①允许 ②不允许 | 跨季度意味着两套系统并行期拉长，会增加 IT 运维负担；具体风险需结合数据迁移复杂度评估，材料未提供 |\n| O2 | **并发审批上限**：50 还是 200？ | ①50 ②200 | 两者差距 4 倍，需历史峰值并发数据支撑；材料未提供峰值数据，无法判断 |\n| O3 | **归档年限**：3 年 还是 5 年？ | ①3 年 ②5 年 | 法务负责\"事后复核合同\"，但材料未给复核周期；归档年限需先与法务对齐复核要求 |\n| O4 | **供应商是否要求驻场**实施？ | ①驻场 ②非驻场 ③混合 | 驻场会增加人力费用，可能挤压 40 万预算；具体预算占比材料未给 |\n\n## 三、缺失信息提示（建议补齐后再拍板 O2、O3）\n\n- 历史审批**峰值并发数**（用于 O2）\n- 法务**合同复核追溯周期**（用于 O3）\n- 供应商**报价结构**与驻场溢价（用于 O4）\n\n---\n\n### ✍️ 确认栏\n\n请逐项回执：\n- **C1–C7**：✅ 接受 / ❌ 异议（请注明编号与原因）\n- **O1–O4**：请圈定选项编号", + "think_stripped": true +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-03.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-03.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..2aa39b0e --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-03.json @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +{ + "task": "ri-03", + "family": "requirement-input", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "collect", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 1577, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 399, + "completion_tokens": 1178, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 0 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 13.96 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "# 待决问题收集表单\n\n> 来源：【req:eval/ri-02/open】，共 4 项未决。\n> 上下文：预算 ≤ 40 万 · Q1 上线 · 干系人：财务（审批）/ 行政（发起）/ IT（运维）/ 法务（事后复核）\n> 已定项（无需再填）：移动端入口保留 · 审批链 ≤ 5 级 · 历史数据只读归档\n\n---\n\n### ① 验收标准签署方 *必填*\n- ☐ 财务\n- ☐ 行政\n\n---\n\n### ② 并发审批上限 *必填*\n- ☐ 50\n- ☐ 200\n\n---\n\n### ③ 供应商是否要求驻场实施 *必填*\n- ☐ 是\n- ☐ 否\n\n---\n\n### ④ 归档年限 *必填*\n- ☐ 3 年\n- ☐ 5 年\n\n---\n\n### 填写说明\n- 4 项均为推进 Q1 上线前需要锁定的决策点。\n- 材料中未给出选型依据（如并发基线、凭证保存年限），建议（分析）在备注栏补充理由，方便事后复核。\n- 若某项暂不能决定，可留空并在备注中标注阻塞原因，便于后续追问。\n\n> 分析提示（仅供参考，非材料事实）：驻场与签署方两项直接影响合同条款与采购排期，建议优先于\"并发上限\"和\"归档年限\"确定。", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 14.0, + "raw_markdown": "The user wants me to organize the open issues from the material into a fillable form page, marking required fields and options, so they can collect all information at once.\n\nLet me analyze the material:\n\nFrom 【req:eval/ri-02/context】:\n- Background: merging two parallel internal approval systems into one, budget cap 40万, expected Q1 launch\n- Stakeholders: 财务 (Finance, approver), 行政 (Admin, initiator), IT (Operations); Legal reviews contracts after the fact\n- Decided: mobile entry retained; approval chain max 5 levels; historical data read-only archive\n\nFrom 【req:eval/ri-02/open】:\nOpen issues:\n1. 验收标准由谁签署：财务还是行政？\n2. 并发审批上限：50 还是 200？\n3. 供应商是否要求驻场实施？\n4. 归档年限未定：3 年还是 5 年？\n\nThe user wants this organized as a fillable form with required/optional markings and options.\n\nLet me design a clean Markdown form card. I should:\n- Mark required fields\n- Provide options as specified in the material\n- Not add facts not in the material\n- Mark my suggestions as analysis\n\nSince the user wants to collect this info \"一次收集完\" (at once), I should present all 4 open questions as form fields.\n\nLet me structure it as a Markdown form. Each field should have:\n- Question/label\n- Required (必填) marker\n- Options provided in the material\n\nI'll add some analysis notes where appropriate (like which stakeholder typically signs acceptance, or considerations for concurrent limits), but clearly mark them as analysis.\n\nLet me draft:\n\n# 待决问题收集表单\n\n> 用途：一次收集【req:eval/ri-02】所有待决项，以便推进 Q1 上线。\n> 已定项（不需填写）：移动端入口保留 / 审批链 ≤ 5 级 / 历史数据只读归档\n> 上下文：预算 ≤ 40 万；干系人 = 财务（审批）/ 行政（发起）/ IT（运维）/ 法务（事后复核）\n\n## 字段 1：验收标准签署方 *必填*\n- 选项：\n - 财务\n - 行政\n- 备注：材料中两个选项并列，未提供更细标准；建议（分析）由发起方行政牵头会签财务，避免后续返工。\n\n## 字段 2：并发审批上限 *必填*\n- 选项：\n - 50\n - 200\n- 备注：建议（分析）依据审批链 ≤ 5 级与日均单量评估，材料未给历史并发基线。\n\n## 字段 3：供应商驻场实施 *必填*\n- 选项：\n - 是（要求驻场）\n - 否（不要求驻场）\n- 备注：影响预算与排期，需在采购前确定。\n\n## 字段 4：归档年限 *必填*\n- 选项：\n - 3 年\n - 5 年\n- 备注：建议（分析）结合法务/财务凭证保存要求选择，材料未提供依据。\n\n---\n\n分析补充：\n- 全部 4 项均会影响合同条款、预算分配与上线节点，建议在同一批次确定后再启动采购与开发。\n- 建议优先级（分析）：1-签署方 → 3-驻场 → 2-并发上限 → 4-归档年限，因前两项直接影响合同与上线。\n\nActually, let me reconsider. The user said \"标注必填与选项\" - mark required vs optional and options. All 4 are pending decisions, so logically all should be required if the goal is to collect them \"一次收集完\" (all at once).\n\nBut wait - maybe some are more critical than others. The user didn't specify, so I should mark them all as 必填 since the goal is to collect all open issues. Or I could make a judgment call (marked as analysis).\n\nLet me keep it simple: all 4 are open issues that need to be decided, so all are 必填 for this collection pass.\n\nLet me finalize the card format. It should be a clean Markdown form, not too verbose.\n\n# 待决问题收集表单\n\n> 来源：【req:eval/ri-02/open】，共 4 项未决。\n> 上下文：预算 ≤ 40 万 · Q1 上线 · 干系人：财务（审批）/ 行政（发起）/ IT（运维）/ 法务（事后复核）\n> 已定项（无需再填）：移动端入口保留 · 审批链 ≤ 5 级 · 历史数据只读归档\n\n---\n\n### ① 验收标准签署方 *必填*\n- ☐ 财务\n- ☐ 行政\n\n---\n\n### ② 并发审批上限 *必填*\n- ☐ 50\n- ☐ 200\n\n---\n\n### ③ 供应商是否要求驻场实施 *必填*\n- ☐ 是\n- ☐ 否\n\n---\n\n### ④ 归档年限 *必填*\n- ☐ 3 年\n- ☐ 5 年\n\n---\n\n### 填写说明\n- 4 项均为推进 Q1 上线前需要锁定的决策点。\n- 材料中未给出选型依据（如并发基线、凭证保存年限），建议（分析）在备注栏补充理由，方便事后复核。\n- 若某项暂不能决定，可留空并在备注中标注阻塞原因，便于后续追问。\n\n> 分析提示（仅供参考，非材料事实）：驻场与签署方两项直接影响合同条款与采购排期，建议优先于\"并发上限\"和\"归档年限\"确定。", + "think_stripped": true +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-04.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-04.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..7280745e --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-04.json @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +{ + "task": "ri-04", + "family": "requirement-input", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "confirm", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 2084, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 397, + "completion_tokens": 1687, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 0 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 0 + } + }, + "latency_s": 16.61 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "# 范围确认页 · 审批系统合并项目\n\n> 用途：分离\"已定约束\"与\"待决事项\"，供逐项勾选确认 \n> 来源：req:eval/ri-03/context、req:eval/ri-03/open\n\n## 一、已定约束 ✅\n\n| # | 维度 | 内容 | 确认 |\n|---|------|------|------|\n| 1 | 合并范围 | 两套并行审批系统 → 合并为一套 | ☐ |\n| 2 | 预算上限 | 40 万 | ☐ |\n| 3 | 期望上线 | Q1 | ☐ |\n| 4 | 移动端 | 保留入口 | ☐ |\n| 5 | 审批链深度 | 最多 5 级 | ☐ |\n| 6 | 历史数据 | 只读归档 | ☐ |\n| 7 | 干系人角色 | 财务 = 审批人；行政 = 发起人；IT = 运维；法务 = 事后复核合同 | ☐ |\n\n## 二、待决事项 ⚠️\n\n| # | 待决问题 | 立场 | 分析与建议 | 决定 |\n|---|----------|------|-----------|------|\n| O1 | 是否需要纸质兜底流程？ | 行政坚持 / IT 反对 | 分析：若出于审计或法务留痕需求，可考虑保留，但限定在特定场景（如法务合同、金额阈值以上），而非全流程兜底，兼顾合规与 IT 维护成本。 | ☐ 全流程纸质 ☐ 限定场景 ☐ 完全电子化 |\n| O2 | 验收标准由谁签署？ | 财务 或 行政 | 分析：行政作为发起人，对流程覆盖度负责；财务作为审批人，对口径与合规负责。建议双方联签，避免单一视角盲区。 | ☐ 财务签 ☐ 行政签 ☐ 联签 |\n| O3 | 并发审批上限 | 50 或 200 | 分析：材料未给出用户基数与峰值场景，无法直接定夺。建议先以 50 为上线基线做压测，再依据实测峰值决定是否扩容至 200。 | ☐ 50 ☐ 200 ☐ 分阶段 |\n| O4 | 供应商是否驻场实施？ | 待定 | 分析：若 Q1 时间窗紧、定制化程度高，驻场利于沟通；若可拆为里程碑交付，远程评审可降低差旅成本。建议结合实施周期与定制占比再判断。 | ☐ 驻场 ☐ 远程 ☐ 混合 |\n\n## 三、确认签字\n\n- 财务代表：______________ 日期：__________\n- 行政代表：______________ 日期：__________\n- IT 代表： ______________ 日期：__________", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 16.6, + "raw_markdown": "The user wants a scope page that separates \"decided\" constraints from \"open\" items, formatted as a Markdown card. I need to:\n\n1. Pull facts only from the materials (req:eval/ri-03/context and req:eval/ri-03/open)\n2. Separate 已定 (decided) from 待决 (open) items\n3. Make it confirmable item-by-item\n4. Mark any analysis/judgments as such (口头标明)\n5. Output is the card body itself, no extra commentary\n\nLet me organize:\n\n**已定约束 (from context):**\n- 合并范围：把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套\n- 预算上限：40 万\n- 上线时间期望：Q1\n- 干系人：财务（审批人）、行政（发起人）、IT（运维）、法务（事后复核合同）\n- 保留移动端入口\n- 审批链最多 5 级\n- 历史数据只读归档\n\n**待决事项 (from open):**\n- 是否需要纸质兜底流程（行政坚持，IT 反对）\n- 验收标准签署人：财务还是行政？\n- 并发审批上限：50 还是 200？\n- 供应商是否要求驻场实施？\n\nI should structure this as a one-page Markdown card with clear sections, checkboxes for confirmation, and analytical notes marked clearly. Let me think about whether to include any analysis.\n\nThe user asked for \"一页能逐项确认的范围页\" - so it should be confirmable item by item. I'll use checkboxes. I should also add brief analytical observations where helpful, but clearly mark them as analysis.\n\nLet me draft:\n\n---\n\n# 范围确认页 · 审批系统合并项目\n\n> 用途：分离\"已定约束\"与\"待决事项\"，逐项勾选确认。\n> 来源：req:eval/ri-03/context、req:eval/ri-03/open\n\n## 一、已定约束 ✅\n\n| # | 维度 | 内容 | 确认 |\n|---|------|------|------|\n| 1 | 合并范围 | 两套并行审批系统 → 一套统一系统 | ☐ |\n| 2 | 预算上限 | 40 万 | ☐ |\n| 3 | 期望上线 | Q1 | ☐ |\n| 4 | 移动端 | 保留入口 | ☐ |\n| 5 | 审批链深度 | 最多 5 级 | ☐ |\n| 6 | 历史数据 | 只读归档 | ☐ |\n| 7 | 干系人角色 | 财务=审批人；行政=发起人；IT=运维；法务=事后复核合同 | ☐ |\n\n## 二、待决事项 ⚠️\n\n| # | 待决问题 | 立场 | 我的建议（分析） | 决定 |\n|---|----------|------|------------------|------|\n| O1 | 是否需要纸质兜底流程？ | 行政坚持，IT 反对 | 分析：若合规/审计要求纸质留痕，建议保留但限定场景（如法务合同、金额阈值以上），而非全流程兜底，可降低 IT 维护成本。 | ☐ 采纳行政 ☐ 采纳 IT ☐ 折中 |\n| O2 | 验收标准由谁签署？ | 财务 还是 行政？ | 分析：行政是发起人，对流程覆盖度负责；财务是审批人，对合规与口径负责。建议双方联签，避免单一视角盲区。 | ☐ 财务 ☐ 行政 ☐ 联签 |\n| O3 | 并发审批上限 | 50 还是 200？ | 分析：需结合用户量与峰值场景判断，材料未给出基数，无法定夺。建议先以 50 MVP线压测，根据实际峰值再决策是否扩容至 200。 | ☐ 50 ☐ 200 ☐ 分阶段 |\n| O4 | 供应商是否驻场实施？ | 待定 | 分析：若实施周期紧、定制较多，驻场利于沟通；反之远程+里程碑评审亦可控制成本。建议看 Q1 时间窗与定制化程度再判断。 | ☐ 驻场 ☐ 远程 ☐ 混合 |\n\n## 三、确认签字\n\n- 财务代表：______________ 日期：__________\n- 行政代表：______________ 日期：__________\n- IT 代表：______________ 日期：__________\n\n---\n\nLet me check:\n- 事实只用材料 ✓\n- 已定与待决分开 ✓\n- 逐项确认 ✓\n- 分析标明 ✓ (用\"我的建议（分析）\"和\"分析：\"前缀)\n- 不编造 ✓ (分析部分明确标注为分析)\n- 卡片正文，不加额外说明 ✓\n\nThe analysis content needs to be cautious—since I don't have data on user volume, peak concurrency, etc., my analysis is appropriately hedged. Let me refine slightly to make sure it's tight and useful.\n\nActually, looking at my analysis for O3, I said \"50 / 200\" but I wrote \"50\" partially—let me fix that typo. And \"压测\" is fine—it's a common IT term meaning stress test.\n\nOne more thing: the format should be \"current system's card form\"—a Markdown card. The above looks appropriate. Let me finalize.\n\n# 范围确认页 · 审批系统合并项目\n\n> 用途：分离\"已定约束\"与\"待决事项\"，供逐项勾选确认 \n> 来源：req:eval/ri-03/context、req:eval/ri-03/open\n\n## 一、已定约束 ✅\n\n| # | 维度 | 内容 | 确认 |\n|---|------|------|------|\n| 1 | 合并范围 | 两套并行审批系统 → 合并为一套 | ☐ |\n| 2 | 预算上限 | 40 万 | ☐ |\n| 3 | 期望上线 | Q1 | ☐ |\n| 4 | 移动端 | 保留入口 | ☐ |\n| 5 | 审批链深度 | 最多 5 级 | ☐ |\n| 6 | 历史数据 | 只读归档 | ☐ |\n| 7 | 干系人角色 | 财务 = 审批人；行政 = 发起人；IT = 运维；法务 = 事后复核合同 | ☐ |\n\n## 二、待决事项 ⚠️\n\n| # | 待决问题 | 立场 | 分析与建议 | 决定 |\n|---|----------|------|-----------|------|\n| O1 | 是否需要纸质兜底流程？ | 行政坚持 / IT 反对 | 分析：若出于审计或法务留痕需求，可考虑保留，但限定在特定场景（如法务合同、金额阈值以上），而非全流程兜底，兼顾合规与 IT 维护成本。 | ☐ 全流程纸质 ☐ 限定场景 ☐ 完全电子化 |\n| O2 | 验收标准由谁签署？ | 财务 或 行政 | 分析：行政作为发起人，对流程覆盖度负责；财务作为审批人，对口径与合规负责。建议双方联签，避免单一视角盲区。 | ☐ 财务签 ☐ 行政签 ☐ 联签 |\n| O3 | 并发审批上限 | 50 或 200 | 分析：材料未给出用户基数与峰值场景，无法直接定夺。建议先以 50 为上线基线做压测，再依据实测峰值决定是否扩容至 200。 | ☐ 50 ☐ 200 ☐ 分阶段 |\n| O4 | 供应商是否驻场实施？ | 待定 | 分析：若 Q1 时间窗紧、定制化程度高，驻场利于沟通；若可拆为里程碑交付，远程评审可降低差旅成本。建议结合实施周期与定制占比再判断。 | ☐ 驻场 ☐ 远程 ☐ 混合 |\n\n## 三、确认签字\n\n- 财务代表：______________ 日期：__________\n- 行政代表：______________ 日期：__________\n- IT 代表： ______________ 日期：__________", + "think_stripped": true +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-05.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-05.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e9c3ea7a --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-05.json @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +{ + "task": "ri-05", + "family": "requirement-input", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "collect", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 1578, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 397, + "completion_tokens": 1181, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 679 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 12.1 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "# 待决问题收集表单\n\n> 项目：内部审批系统合并（双系统→单系统）｜预算上限 40 万｜目标 Q1 上线\n> 收集日期：__________ 填表人：__________ 【必填】\n\n---\n\n## Q1 · 验收标准签署方\n\n> 依据：财务为审批人、行政为发起人，签署方待定。\n\n- ◯ **财务**\n- ◯ **行政**\n- ◯ 财务 + 行政 联合签署（【分析】建议，便于权责闭环）\n- ◯ 其他：________\n\n【必填】 · 建议附签署模板链接：__________\n\n---\n\n## Q2 · 旧系统下线窗口\n\n> 依据：上线目标 Q1，下线是否允许跨季度未决。\n\n- ◯ **允许跨季度**（建议阶段内只读，并行一段时间）\n- ◯ **必须 Q1 内完成**（上线即切换，强制 deadline）\n- ◯ 其他安排：________\n\n【必填】 · 若跨季度，请注明并行窗口长度：________\n\n---\n\n## Q3 · 并发审批上限\n\n> 依据：候选值 50 或 200，待选定。\n\n| 选项 | 适用场景判断【分析】 |\n|---|---|\n| ◯ **50** | 单部门并行场景，建议保守值 |\n| ◯ **200** | 多部门集中提报场景，建议保险值 |\n| ◯ 其他数值：________ | __ |\n\n【必填】 · 选定值：________\n\n---\n\n## Q4 · 供应商实施方式\n\n> 依据：是否要求驻场未决。\n\n- ◯ **驻场实施**（含驻场人数与周期：________）\n- ◯ **远程实施**\n- ◯ 混合（驻场 + 远程，比例与节点：________）\n\n【必填】\n\n---\n\n## Q5 · 补充约束（【选填】）\n\n用于补充未在待决清单内、但会影响推进的问题，例如合同条款、数据迁移节奏、UAT 责任方等：\n\n- 补充项 1：________\n- 补充项 2：________\n\n---\n\n**收集说明**：\n- 标注【分析】的内容为基于背景材料的判断建议，非材料原文事实，请填表人确认后再定。\n- 表单回填后，建议由 IT 汇总并知会财务、行政、法务四方确认，再进入实施合同谈判环节。", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 12.1, + "raw_markdown": "The user wants me to organize the open issues into a fillable form page, marking required fields and options, so they can collect all answers at once. Let me look at the materials carefully.\n\nFrom the context (req:eval/ri-04/context):\n- Background: Merging two parallel internal approval systems into one, budget cap 40万, expected Q1 launch\n- Stakeholders: Finance (approver), Administration (initiator), IT (operations); Legal post-review of contracts\n- Decided: Keep mobile entry; approval chain max 5 levels; historical data read-only archived\n\nFrom open issues (req:eval/ri-04/open):\n- Who signs acceptance criteria: Finance or Administration?\n- Is old system shutdown window allowed to cross quarters?\n- Concurrent approval upper limit: 50 or 200?\n- Does vendor require on-site implementation?\n\nThe user wants this organized as a fillable form page with required fields marked and options provided.\n\nLet me design a clean form structure. I should:\n1. Mark each item's required status\n2. Provide options where the material gives choices\n3. Add fields like \"填表人\", \"填表日期\" for the form to be complete\n4. Use analysis notes where I'm making recommendations\n\nLet me think about required fields - the user said \"标注必填\", so I need to mark which fields are required. Given this is a decision collection form, likely all the core decisions are required, while metadata fields like \"填表人\" could be required too.\n\nLet me draft the form:\n\n# 待决问题收集表单\n\n## 表头信息\n- 填表人 [必填]\n- 填表日期 [必填]\n- 表单版本 [选填]\n\n## 一、验收标准签署方\n**说明**：背景资料中提到财务为审批人，行政为发起人，但验收签署方未明确。\n- 选项：\n - ○ 财务\n - ○ 行政\n - ○ 财务+行政联合签署\n - ○ 其他：_____\n- 必填：是\n\n## 二、旧系统下线窗口\n**说明**：Q1 上线，旧系统下线窗口是否可跨季度未决。\n- 选项：\n - ○ 允许跨季度\n - ○ 必须 Q1 内完成\n - ○ 其他安排：_____\n- 必填：是\n\n## 三、并发审批上限\n**说明**：材料给出两个候选值。\n- 选项：\n - ○ 50\n - ○ 200\n - ○ 其他数值：_____\n- 必填：是\n\n## 四、供应商实施方式\n**说明**：是否要求驻场实施。\n- 选项：\n - ○ 驻场实施\n - ○ 远程实施\n - ○ 混合（驻场+远程）：_____\n- 必填：是\n\n## 五、补充意见（选填）\n\nI should also note where I'm making analysis/judgment calls. Let me check:\n- The options like \"财务+行政联合签署\", \"其他安排\", \"其他数值\" are my additions - I should mark these as analytical recommendations\n- The \"必填\" marking is my judgment - I should note this as analysis\n\nLet me make the output clean and useful. The system says output is a Markdown card directly, no extra explanation.\n\n# 待决问题收集表单\n\n> 项目：内部审批系统合并（双系统→单系统）｜预算上限 40 万｜目标 Q1 上线\n> 收集日期：__________ 填表人：__________ 【必填】\n\n---\n\n## Q1 · 验收标准签署方\n\n> 依据：财务为审批人、行政为发起人，签署方待定。\n\n- ◯ **财务**\n- ◯ **行政**\n- ◯ 财务 + 行政 联合签署（【分析】建议，便于权责闭环）\n- ◯ 其他：________\n\n【必填】 · 建议附签署模板链接：__________\n\n---\n\n## Q2 · 旧系统下线窗口\n\n> 依据：上线目标 Q1，下线是否允许跨季度未决。\n\n- ◯ **允许跨季度**（建议阶段内只读，并行一段时间）\n- ◯ **必须 Q1 内完成**（上线即切换，强制 deadline）\n- ◯ 其他安排：________\n\n【必填】 · 若跨季度，请注明并行窗口长度：________\n\n---\n\n## Q3 · 并发审批上限\n\n> 依据：候选值 50 或 200，待选定。\n\n| 选项 | 适用场景判断【分析】 |\n|---|---|\n| ◯ **50** | 单部门并行场景，建议保守值 |\n| ◯ **200** | 多部门集中提报场景，建议保险值 |\n| ◯ 其他数值：________ | __ |\n\n【必填】 · 选定值：________\n\n---\n\n## Q4 · 供应商实施方式\n\n> 依据：是否要求驻场未决。\n\n- ◯ **驻场实施**（含驻场人数与周期：________）\n- ◯ **远程实施**\n- ◯ 混合（驻场 + 远程，比例与节点：________）\n\n【必填】\n\n---\n\n## Q5 · 补充约束（【选填】）\n\n用于补充未在待决清单内、但会影响推进的问题，例如合同条款、数据迁移节奏、UAT 责任方等：\n\n- 补充项 1：________\n- 补充项 2：________\n\n---\n\n**收集说明**：\n- 标注【分析】的内容为基于背景材料的判断建议，非材料原文事实，请填表人确认后再定。\n- 表单回填后，建议由 IT 汇总并知会财务、行政、法务四方确认，再进入实施合同谈判环节。", + "think_stripped": true +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-06.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-06.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b24064e9 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-06.json @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +{ + "task": "ri-06", + "family": "requirement-input", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "confirm", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 1471, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 399, + "completion_tokens": 1072, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 0 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 11.48 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "# 合并审批系统 · 范围确认页\n\n## 一、已定约束（基线 · 不可变更）\n- [ ] **系统范围**：两套并行审批系统 → 合并为一套\n- [ ] **预算上限**：40 万\n- [ ] **上线时间**：Q1\n- [ ] **干系人分工**：财务 = 审批人；行政 = 发起人；IT = 运维；法务 = 事后复核合同\n- [ ] **移动端入口**：保留\n- [ ] **审批链层级**：最多 5 级\n- [ ] **历史数据处理**：只读归档\n\n## 二、待决事项（需逐项拍板）\n- [ ] **纸质兜底流程是否保留** —— 行政坚持、IT 反对（立场冲突，待拍板方裁决）\n- [ ] **验收标准签署方** —— 财务 或 行政\n- [ ] **供应商实施方式** —— 是否要求驻场\n- [ ] **归档年限** —— 3 年 或 5 年\n\n---\n\n**分析提示**：四项待决中，「纸质兜底」一项存在明确立场对立，建议优先处理——是否保留纸质通道会直接影响系统冗余设计与运维责任划分；其余三项可顺次确认并分别落入合同条款、验收文档与归档策略。", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 11.5, + "raw_markdown": "The user wants a one-page scope document that separates confirmed constraints from pending decisions, allowing item-by-item confirmation. Let me organize the material:\n\nConfirmed constraints (已定):\n- Internal approval systems merged: two parallel systems → one unified system\n- Budget cap: 40万 (400,000)\n- Timeline: Q1 go-live\n- Stakeholders: Finance (approver), Admin (initiator), IT (operations); Legal reviews contracts post-hoc\n- Mobile entry point retained\n- Approval chain max 5 levels\n- Historical data: read-only archive\n\nPending decisions (待决):\n- Paper-based fallback process? Admin insists, IT opposes\n- Acceptance criteria sign-off: Finance or Admin?\n- Does vendor need on-site implementation?\n- Archive retention period: 3 years or 5 years?\n\nI need to present this as a Markdown card. The format should be a single page scope document with clear separation between confirmed and pending items. Let me make it scannable for item-by-item confirmation.\n\nI should label my analytical remarks as such. The user's goal is to confirm items, so I should make checkboxes or clear confirmation points.\n\nLet me structure it:\n- Title\n- Section 1: 已定约束 (Confirmed Constraints)\n- Section 2: 待决事项 (Pending Decisions)\n- Each item should be checkable\n\nFor the conflicting items (paper fallback), I can note this is an analysis since the user asked me to flag conflicts.\n\nLet me draft:\n\n# 合并审批系统 · 范围确认页\n\n## 一、已定约束（基线，不可变更）\n- [ ] 范围：两套并行审批系统 → 合并为一套\n- [ ] 预算上限：40 万\n- [ ] 上线时间：Q1\n- [ ] 干系人角色：财务=审批人；行政=发起人；IT=运维；法务=事后复核合同\n- [ ] 保留移动端入口\n- [ ] 审批链最多 5 级\n- [ ] 历史数据：只读归档\n\n## 二、待决事项（需逐项确认）\n- [ ] **纸质兜底流程**：行政坚持保留 / IT 反对（存在立场冲突，建议拍板前由发起方说明理由）\n- [ ] **验收标准签署方**：财务 or 行政\n- [ ] **供应商实施方式**：是否要求驻场\n- [ ] **归档年限**：3 年 or 5 年\n\n## 三、下一步建议（分析）\n- 建议先确认 P1 中的冲突项（纸质兜底），因其影响系统架构冗余设计\n- 其余三项可在确认后分别落到合同条款与运维手册\n\nLet me refine this. The user wants \"一页能逐项确认的范围页\" - a one-page scope page that allows item-by-item confirmation. Checkboxes are appropriate.\n\nI should be careful: only state facts from the material, and mark analysis/judgments verbally.\n\nThe material is clear and complete. I don't need to invent anything. Let me make sure I'm not adding facts beyond the source.\n\nLet me reconsider - the \"下一步建议\" section is my analysis/suggestion, so I should clearly mark it as such. The user asked for a scope page for item-by-item confirmation, not necessarily for next steps. But a small analytical note about prioritization could be helpful since there's a clear conflict (paper fallback with opposing stakeholders).\n\nActually, let me re-read the user goal: \"把已定约束与待决事项分开呈现，给我一页能逐项确认的范围页\" - separate confirmed constraints from pending decisions, give me a one-page scope page for item-by-item confirmation.\n\nSo the core is just the separation and checkboxes. I can add a brief analysis note about the conflict since it's evident from the material.\n\nLet me finalize the format. Markdown card. Checkboxes for each item. Clear sections. Brief.\n\n# 合并审批系统 · 范围确认页\n\n## 一、已定约束（基线 · 不可变更）\n- [ ] **系统范围**：两套并行审批系统 → 合并为一套\n- [ ] **预算上限**：40 万\n- [ ] **上线时间**：Q1\n- [ ] **干系人分工**：财务 = 审批人；行政 = 发起人；IT = 运维；法务 = 事后复核合同\n- [ ] **移动端入口**：保留\n- [ ] **审批链层级**：最多 5 级\n- [ ] **历史数据处理**：只读归档\n\n## 二、待决事项（需逐项拍板）\n- [ ] **纸质兜底流程是否保留** —— 行政坚持、IT 反对（立场冲突，待拍板方裁决）\n- [ ] **验收标准签署方** —— 财务 或 行政\n- [ ] **供应商实施方式** —— 是否要求驻场\n- [ ] **归档年限** —— 3 年 或 5 年\n\n---\n\n**分析提示**：四项待决中，「纸质兜底」一项存在明确立场对立，建议优先处理——是否保留纸质通道会直接影响系统冗余设计与运维责任划分；其余三项可顺次确认并分别落入合同条款、验收文档与归档策略。", + "think_stripped": true +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-07.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-07.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..6f77cadd --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-07.json @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +{ + "task": "ri-07", + "family": "requirement-input", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "collect", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 1402, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 397, + "completion_tokens": 1005, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 10.91 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "# 待决问题收集表单\n\n> **填写说明**：请对每个问题直接选择或填写结果；标 ✱ 为必填项。所有项目需在本次收集完毕。\n\n---\n\n## 1. 旧系统下线窗口 ✱\n\n**问题**：旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度？\n\n| 选项 | 说明 |\n|---|---|\n| ☐ 允许跨季度 | 例：Q1 切换新系统，旧系统保留至 Q2 末再下线 |\n| ☐ 不允许跨季度 | 必须在本季度内完成下线 |\n| ☐ 其他：__________ | 请注明具体安排 |\n\n补充说明（可选）：_________________________________\n\n---\n\n## 2. 验收标准签署方 ✱\n\n**问题**：验收标准由谁签署？\n\n| 选项 | 说明 |\n|---|---|\n| ☐ 财务 | 财务作为审批方主导签署 |\n| ☐ 行政 | 行政作为发起方主导签署 |\n| ☐ 财务 + 行政 双签 | 双方共同签署 |\n| ☐ 其他：__________ | 请注明 |\n\n---\n\n## 3. 供应商实施方式 ✱\n\n**问题**：供应商是否要求驻场实施？\n\n| 选项 | 说明 |\n|---|---|\n| ☐ 必须驻场 | 供应商人员需现场实施 |\n| ☐ 远程即可 | 远程支持可完成实施 |\n| ☐ 混合模式 | 关键阶段驻场，其余远程 |\n| ☐ 待谈判 | 尚未确认 |\n\n补充说明（可选）：_________________________________\n\n---\n\n## 4. 并发审批上限 ✱\n\n**问题**：并发审批上限值设定？\n\n| 选项 | 说明 |\n|---|---|\n| ☐ 50 | 保守值，适配小并发场景 |\n| ☐ 200 | 较高值，适配大并发场景 |\n| ☐ 其他：__________ | 请注明具体数值 |\n\n依据（可选，例如历史峰值、压测数据）：_________________________________\n\n---\n\n## 汇总确认\n\n| 项 | 我的选择 |\n|---|---|\n| 1. 下线窗口 | _____________ |\n| 2. 验收签署方 | _____________ |\n| 3. 供应商实施 | _____________ |\n| 4. 并发上限 | _____________ |\n\n**填写人**：_____________　**日期**：_____________\n\n---\n\n## 分析与建议（非定论，仅供参考）\n\n> 以下为基于材料背景的初步判断，需您结合实际情况确认。\n\n- **下线窗口**：建议优先选择\"**不允许跨季度**\"，与\"Q1 上线\"的期望对齐，降低并行运维成本。✱ 跨季度会同时增加 IT 运维与历史数据只读归档的复杂度。\n- **验收签署**：结合干系人角色（财务=审批人、行政=发起人），建议采用\"**财务 + 行政 双签**\"，单方签署易遗漏视角。注：材料未明确法务是否需介入验收签署，建议另列问题向法务确认。\n- **供应商实施**：预算 40 万体量下，\"**混合模式**\"通常在成本与风险间较为平衡。\n- **并发上限**：材料未给出历史峰值数据。若无压测依据，**建议先按 50 试运行**，后续按需调高至 200，避免一次性投入过载。", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 10.9, + "raw_markdown": "The user wants me to organize the open issues from the material into a fillable form page, marking required fields and options, to collect all at once.\n\nLet me extract the open issues from the material:\n1. 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度？(Old system decommissioning window - allowed across quarters?)\n2. 验收标准由谁签署：财务还是行政？(Acceptance criteria sign-off by whom: Finance or Admin?)\n3. 供应商是否要求驻场实施？(Does vendor require on-site implementation?)\n4. 并发审批上限：50 还是 200？(Concurrent approval limit: 50 or 200?)\n\nI need to organize these into a form with required fields marked and options provided. Let me think about what's appropriate:\n\n1. 跨季度下线窗口 - This is a yes/no question, could also need a brief explanation\n2. 验收签署 - Multiple choice between Finance/Admin/Other\n3. 驻场实施 - Yes/No\n4. 并发审批上限 - Multiple choice between 50/200/other\n\nI should mark these as required since the user wants to \"一次收集完\" (collect all at once).\n\nLet me format as a Markdown card with form fields. The user said \"表单页\" (form page) so I should structure it like a form with clear fields, labels, and options.\n\nLet me also include some analysis notes as the system prompt requires - \"你的判断与建议需口头标明是分析\" (your judgment and recommendations must verbally mark them as analysis).\n\nI'll organize this into a clean form structure with required markers and provide some brief analysis at the end about recommended defaults.\n\n# 待决问题收集表单\n\n> **填写说明**：请对每个问题直接选择或填写结果；标 ✱ 为必填项。所有项目需在本次收集完毕。\n\n---\n\n## 1. 旧系统下线窗口 ✱\n\n**问题**：旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度？\n\n| 选项 | 说明 |\n|---|---|\n| ☐ 允许跨季度 | 例：Q1 切换新系统，旧系统保留至 Q2 末再下线 |\n| ☐ 不允许跨季度 | 必须在本季度内完成下线 |\n| ☐ 其他：__________ | 请注明具体安排 |\n\n补充说明（可选）：_________________________________\n\n---\n\n## 2. 验收标准签署方 ✱\n\n**问题**：验收标准由谁签署？\n\n| 选项 | 说明 |\n|---|---|\n| ☐ 财务 | 财务作为审批方主导签署 |\n| ☐ 行政 | 行政作为发起方主导签署 |\n| ☐ 财务 + 行政 双签 | 双方共同签署 |\n| ☐ 其他：__________ | 请注明 |\n\n---\n\n## 3. 供应商实施方式 ✱\n\n**问题**：供应商是否要求驻场实施？\n\n| 选项 | 说明 |\n|---|---|\n| ☐ 必须驻场 | 供应商人员需现场实施 |\n| ☐ 远程即可 | 远程支持可完成实施 |\n| ☐ 混合模式 | 关键阶段驻场，其余远程 |\n| ☐ 待谈判 | 尚未确认 |\n\n补充说明（可选）：_________________________________\n\n---\n\n## 4. 并发审批上限 ✱\n\n**问题**：并发审批上限值设定？\n\n| 选项 | 说明 |\n|---|---|\n| ☐ 50 | 保守值，适配小并发场景 |\n| ☐ 200 | 较高值，适配大并发场景 |\n| ☐ 其他：__________ | 请注明具体数值 |\n\n依据（可选，例如历史峰值、压测数据）：_________________________________\n\n---\n\n## 汇总确认\n\n| 项 | 我的选择 |\n|---|---|\n| 1. 下线窗口 | _____________ |\n| 2. 验收签署方 | _____________ |\n| 3. 供应商实施 | _____________ |\n| 4. 并发上限 | _____________ |\n\n**填写人**：_____________　**日期**：_____________\n\n---\n\n## 分析与建议（非定论，仅供参考）\n\n> 以下为基于材料背景的初步判断，需您结合实际情况确认。\n\n- **下线窗口**：建议优先选择\"**不允许跨季度**\"，与\"Q1 上线\"的期望对齐，降低并行运维成本。✱ 跨季度会同时增加 IT 运维与历史数据只读归档的复杂度。\n- **验收签署**：结合干系人角色（财务=审批人、行政=发起人），建议采用\"**财务 + 行政 双签**\"，单方签署易遗漏视角。注：材料未明确法务是否需介入验收签署，建议另列问题向法务确认。\n- **供应商实施**：预算 40 万体量下，\"**混合模式**\"通常在成本与风险间较为平衡。\n- **并发上限**：材料未给出历史峰值数据。若无压测依据，**建议先按 50 试运行**，后续按需调高至 200，避免一次性投入过载。", + "think_stripped": true +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-08.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-08.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..d797be91 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-08.json @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +{ + "task": "ri-08", + "family": "requirement-input", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "confirm", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 1411, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 399, + "completion_tokens": 1012, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 355 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 8.48 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "# 审批系统合并项目 · 范围确认页\n\n> 单页用于逐项确认已定约束与待决事项，请相关干系人逐条勾选/反馈。\n\n---\n\n## 一、项目基本信息（来自背景说明）\n\n| 项 | 内容 |\n|---|---|\n| 目标 | 把内部审批从**两套并行系统**合并为**一套** |\n| 预算上限 | **40 万** |\n| 期望上线 | **Q1** |\n| 干系人 | 财务（审批人）、行政（发起人）、IT（运维）；法务**事后复核合同** |\n\n---\n\n## 二、已定约束（锁定，不再讨论）\n\n| # | 约束 | 确认 |\n|---|---|---|\n| C1 | **保留移动端入口** | ☐ |\n| C2 | **审批链最多 5 级** | ☐ |\n| C3 | **历史数据只读归档** | ☐ |\n\n---\n\n## 三、待决事项（需逐项拍板）\n\n> 每项给出可选方案与立场，建议开会前书面表态，避免会上反复。\n\n### Q1 · 并发审批上限\n\n| 选项 | 说明 |\n|---|---|\n| A. **50** | 保守，资源占用低 |\n| B. **200** | 高并发，覆盖大促/月末集中审批场景 |\n\n- 立场：**未记录到干系人表态**（需 IT 提供容量测算依据）\n- 当前选择：☐ A　☐ B\n\n### Q2 · 验收标准签署方\n\n| 选项 | 说明 |\n|---|---|\n| A. **财务** | 强调审批口径合规 |\n| B. **行政** | 强调业务可用性与流程闭环 |\n\n- 立场：**两方各有主张，未达成一致**\n- 当前选择：☐ A　☐ B\n\n### Q3 · 是否保留纸质兜底流程\n\n| 选项 | 立场 |\n|---|---|\n| A. **保留纸质兜底** | 行政坚持（出于业务连续性考量，分析认为其担心系统故障期无法发起审批） |\n| B. **不保留** | IT 反对（出于运维成本与\"双轨制\"抵消合并收益的考量，分析认为会增加维护负担） |\n\n- 当前选择：☐ A　☐ B\n\n### Q4 · 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度\n\n| 选项 | 说明 |\n|---|---|\n| A. **本季度内下线** | 利于预算与运维一次性切换 |\n| B. **允许跨季度** | 利于历史数据只读归档期内的查询兜底 |\n\n- 立场：**未记录到干系人表态**\n- 当前选择：☐ A　☐ B\n\n---\n\n## 四、确认栏\n\n- 财务：________________　日期：__________\n- 行政：________________　日期：__________\n- IT：________________　__________________\n- 法务（事后复核，仅备案）：________________\n\n> 备注：以上\"分析\"标注项为基于材料中各方立场做出的推断判断，非材料原文表述；其余内容均直接来源于【req:eval/ri-07/context】与【req:eval/ri-07/open】。", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 8.5, + "raw_markdown": "The user wants a one-page scope document that separates 已定约束 (decided constraints) from 待决事项 (open items), formatted as a Markdown card. I need to use only facts from the materials, and mark any analysis/judgment verbally as \"分析\".\n\nLet me parse the materials:\n\nFrom context (req:eval/ri-07/context):\n- Background: Merge two parallel internal approval systems into one, budget cap 40万, expected online in Q1\n- Stakeholders: 财务 (approver), 行政 (initiator), IT (operations); 法务 reviews contracts afterwards\n- Decided:\n - 保留移动端入口\n - 审批链最多 5 级\n - 历史数据只读归档\n\nFrom open (req:eval/ri-07/open):\n- Open items:\n - 并发审批上限：50 还是 200？\n - 验收标准由谁签署：财务还是行政？\n - 是否需要纸质兜底流程？行政坚持，IT 反对\n - 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度？\n\nI need to present this as a clean one-page scope confirmation document. The user wants to confirm each item, so it should be structured for逐项确认 (item-by-item confirmation).\n\nLet me structure as:\n1. 项目背景 (brief)\n2. 已定约束 (decided - 锁定的范围)\n3. 待决事项 (open - 需决策的项)\n\nFor each待决 item, I should present the options clearly.\n\nLet me draft this carefully. The output should be a Markdown card — so it should be self-contained, clean, formatted well.\n\nI should not add extra explanation outside the card. Output = card body.\n\nLet me write it:\n\n# 审批系统合并项目 · 范围确认页\n\n> 单页用于逐项确认已定约束与待决事项，请相关干系人逐条勾选/反馈。\n\n---\n\n## 一、项目基本信息（来自背景说明）\n\n| 项 | 内容 |\n|---|---|\n| 目标 | 把内部审批从**两套并行系统**合并为**一套** |\n| 预算上限 | **40 万** |\n| 期望上线 | **Q1** |\n| 干系人 | 财务（审批人）、行政（发起人）、IT（运维）；法务**事后复核合同** |\n\n---\n\n## 二、已定约束（锁定，不再讨论）\n\n| # | 约束 | 确认 |\n|---|---|---|\n| C1 | **保留移动端入口** | ☐ |\n| C2 | **审批链最多 5 级** | ☐ |\n| C3 | **历史数据只读归档** | ☐ |\n\n---\n\n## 三、待决事项（需逐项拍板）\n\n> 每项给出可选方案与立场，建议开会前书面表态，避免会上反复。\n\n### Q1 · 并发审批上限\n\n| 选项 | 说明 |\n|---|---|\n| A. **50** | 保守，资源占用低 |\n| B. **200** | 高并发，覆盖大促/月末集中审批场景 |\n\n- 立场：**未记录到干系人表态**（需 IT 提供容量测算依据）\n- 当前选择：☐ A　☐ B\n\n### Q2 · 验收标准签署方\n\n| 选项 | 说明 |\n|---|---|\n| A. **财务** | 强调审批口径合规 |\n| B. **行政** | 强调业务可用性与流程闭环 |\n\n- 立场：**两方各有主张，未达成一致**\n- 当前选择：☐ A　☐ B\n\n### Q3 · 是否保留纸质兜底流程\n\n| 选项 | 立场 |\n|---|---|\n| A. **保留纸质兜底** | 行政坚持（出于业务连续性考量，分析认为其担心系统故障期无法发起审批） |\n| B. **不保留** | IT 反对（出于运维成本与\"双轨制\"抵消合并收益的考量，分析认为会增加维护负担） |\n\n- 当前选择：☐ A　☐ B\n\n### Q4 · 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度\n\n| 选项 | 说明 |\n|---|---|\n| A. **本季度内下线** | 利于预算与运维一次性切换 |\n| B. **允许跨季度** | 利于历史数据只读归档期内的查询兜底 |\n\n- 立场：**未记录到干系人表态**\n- 当前选择：☐ A　☐ B\n\n---\n\n## 四、确认栏\n\n- 财务：________________　日期：__________\n- 行政：________________　日期：__________\n- IT：________________　__________________\n- 法务（事后复核，仅备案）：________________\n\n> 备注：以上\"分析\"标注项为基于材料中各方立场做出的推断判断，非材料原文表述；其余内容均直接来源于【req:eval/ri-07/context】与【req:eval/ri-07/open】。", + "think_stripped": true +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-09.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-09.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..82e04bf3 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-09.json @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +{ + "task": "ri-09", + "family": "requirement-input", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "collect", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 1503, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 402, + "completion_tokens": 1101, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 493 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 11.02 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "# 决策收集表 · 合并审批系统\n\n> 本表用于一次收集【req:eval/ri-08/open】中四项待决问题。请各干系人在对应字段填写结论。\n\n---\n\n## 基本信息（必填）\n\n| 字段 | 内容 |\n|---|---|\n| 填表人 | ____________ |\n| 角色 | ☐ 财务（审批人） ☐ 行政（发起人） ☐ IT（运维） ☐ 法务（事后复核） |\n| 填表日期 | ____________ |\n\n---\n\n## 待决问题（每项均必填）\n\n### ① 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度？\n\n- **类型**：单选\n- **关联约束**：期望 Q1 上线（来自 context）\n- **选项**：\n - ☐ 不允许跨季度（须在 Q1 内完成下线）\n - ☐ 允许跨季度（可延至 Q2）\n - ☐ 其他：____________\n\n### ② 历史数据归档年限\n\n- **类型**：单选\n- **关联约束**：归档只读（context 强制），其余决策维度需自评\n- **选项**：\n - ☐ 3 年\n - ☐ 5 年\n - ☐ 其他：____________\n- **决策依据（选填）**：☐ 法规要求 ☐ 成本考量 ☐ 审计需要 ☐ 其他\n\n### ③ 供应商是否要求驻场实施？\n\n- **类型**：单选\n- **关联约束**：预算上限 40 万（来自 context）——分析：驻场通常推高人力成本，需与预算联动确认\n- **选项**：\n - ☐ 要求驻场（预估溢价：____ 万）\n - ☐ 不要求驻场（远程实施）\n - ☐ 视情况（说明条件）：____________\n\n### ④ 是否保留纸质兜底流程？\n\n- **类型**：单选（已有分歧，需最终裁决）\n- **关联约束**：行政坚持保留，IT 反对；无 context 硬性约束\n- **分歧记录**：\n - 行政立场：坚持保留（理由：____）\n - IT 立场：反对保留（理由：____）\n- **选项**：\n - ☐ 保留纸质兜底\n - ☐ 不保留，全线上\n - ☐ 折中方案（说明）：____________\n- **最终裁决人**：____________\n\n---\n\n## 交叉影响提示（分析）\n\n- 若①选\"跨季度\"，与 Q1 上线期望冲突，需重新对齐上线时间。\n- 若③选\"驻场\"，建议同步复核 40 万预算上限是否可承受（分析）。\n- 若④选\"保留\"，需评估是否与\"保留移动端入口\"形成双通道运维负担（分析）。\n\n---\n\n## 提交\n\n填完后回填本表，IT 汇总后进入下一决策环节。", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 11.0 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-10.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-10.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..2ab2d224 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/ri-10.json @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +{ + "task": "ri-10", + "family": "requirement-input", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "confirm", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 1130, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 398, + "completion_tokens": 732, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 235 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 6.18 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "# 范围确认页｜内部审批系统合并\n\n## 一、已定约束（基线）\n\n| # | 约束项 | 取值 | 备注 |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| 1 | 系统整合目标 | 两套并行审批系统合并为一套 | — |\n| 2 | 预算上限 | 40 万 | — |\n| 3 | 上线时间 | Q1 | — |\n| 4 | 移动端入口 | 保留 | — |\n| 5 | 审批链级数 | 最多 5 级 | — |\n| 6 | 历史数据处置 | 只读归档 | 不迁移至新审批流 |\n| 7 | 干系人—财务 | 审批人 | — |\n| 8 | 干系人—行政 | 发起人 | — |\n| 9 | 干系人—IT | 运维 | — |\n| 10 | 干系人—法务 | 事后复核合同 | 不嵌入审批链 |\n\n## 二、待决事项（需逐项确认）\n\n### D1｜归档年限\n- 选项 A：3 年\n- 选项 B：5 年\n- ☐ 确认：_____\n\n### D2｜并发审批上限\n- 选项 A：50\n- 选项 B：200\n- ☐ 确认：_____\n\n### D3｜是否需要纸质兜底流程\n- 立场：行政坚持，IT 反对\n- ☐ 确认：需要 / 不需要\n\n### D4｜供应商是否要求驻场实施\n- ☐ 确认：要求 / 不要求\n\n## 三、口头分析（不构成决定，仅供参考）\n\n- **D1**：若历史数据仅\"只读归档\"、无业务查询压力，3 年通常可覆盖常规审计周期；若财务或合规另有 5 年强制要求，需提前对齐法务口径。\n- **D2**：50 偏保守，200 更适合合并后的统一入口量级；但需 IT 同步评估中间件与消息通道承载能力。\n- **D3**：纸质兜底与\"合并为一套系统\"的精简目标存在张力，建议明确兜底仅作灾备而非日常并行通道，否则两套体系实质未合并。\n- **D4**：驻场会显著影响 40 万预算与 Q1 上线节奏；若必须驻场，需在合同与排期上预留缓冲。", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 6.2, + "raw_markdown": "The user wants a range/scope document page that separates already-fixed constraints from pending/open items, allowing them to confirm each one item by item. The output should be a Markdown card.\n\nLet me organize the content:\n\n**Fixed/Determined constraints:**\n- Consolidate two parallel approval systems into one\n- Budget cap: 400,000\n- Target launch: Q1\n- Stakeholders: Finance (approver), Admin (initiator), IT (operations); Legal reviews contracts after the fact\n- Preserve mobile entry\n- Approval chain max 5 levels\n- Historical data: read-only archive\n\n**Open/Pending items:**\n1. Archive retention period: 3 years or 5 years?\n2. Concurrent approval limit: 50 or 200?\n3. Paper fallback process needed? Admin insists, IT opposes.\n4. Does vendor require on-site implementation?\n\nI need to:\n- Only use facts provided, no fabrication\n- Mark judgments/recommendations as analysis\n- Output as a card (Markdown), no extra commentary\n- Make it a one-page scope confirmation sheet with each item confirmable\n\nLet me format this cleanly as a Markdown card.\n\n# 范围确认页｜内部审批系统合并\n\n## 一、已定约束（基线）\n\n| # | 约束项 | 取值 | 备注 |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| 1 | 系统整合目标 | 两套并行审批系统合并为一套 | — |\n| 2 | 预算上限 | 40 万 | — |\n| 3 | 上线时间 | Q1 | — |\n| 4 | 移动端入口 | 保留 | — |\n| 5 | 审批链级数 | 最多 5 级 | — |\n| 6 | 历史数据处置 | 只读归档 | 不迁移至新审批流 |\n| 7 | 干系人—财务 | 审批人 | — |\n| 8 | 干系人—行政 | 发起人 | — |\n| 9 | 干系人—IT | 运维 | — |\n| 10 | 干系人—法务 | 事后复核合同 | 不嵌入审批链 |\n\n## 二、待决事项（需逐项确认）\n\n### D1｜归档年限\n- 选项 A：3 年\n- 选项 B：5 年\n- ☐ 确认：_____\n\n### D2｜并发审批上限\n- 选项 A：50\n- 选项 B：200\n- ☐ 确认：_____\n\n### D3｜是否需要纸质兜底流程\n- 立场：行政坚持，IT 反对\n- ☐ 确认：需要 / 不需要\n\n### D4｜供应商是否要求驻场实施\n- ☐ 确认：要求 / 不要求\n\n## 三、口头分析（不构成决定，仅供参考）\n\n- **D1**：若历史数据仅\"只读归档\"、无业务查询压力，3 年通常可覆盖常规审计周期；若财务或合规另有 5 年强制要求，需提前对齐法务口径。\n- **D2**：50 偏保守，200 更适合合并后的统一入口量级；但需 IT 同步评估中间件与消息通道承载能力。\n- **D3**：纸质兜底与\"合并为一套系统\"的精简目标存在张力，建议明确兜底仅作灾备而非日常并行通道，否则两套体系实质未合并。\n- **D4**：驻场会显著影响 40 万预算与 Q1 上线节奏；若必须驻场，需在合同与排期上预留缓冲。", + "think_stripped": true +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-01.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-01.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..a9e8220b --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-01.json @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +{ + "task": "to-01", + "family": "task-overview", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "progress", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 859, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 440, + "completion_tokens": 419, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 0 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 6.34 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "# 任务进度卡片：交付门禁自动化（eval/to-00）\n\n## 📊 当前进度\n\n| 步骤 | 状态 |\n|---|---|\n| 需求冻结 | ✅ done |\n| 契约定义 | ✅ done（10-11 评审通过，含两处字段口径修订） |\n| **存储迁移** | 🔄 **in_progress** |\n| 灰度开关 | ⏳ pending |\n| 回退演练 | ⏳ pending |\n\n整体完成度：2/5 done + 1 in_progress（分析：约 60%，处于中后段）\n\n---\n\n## 🎯 下一步\n\n**主路径**：推进**存储迁移**收尾\n- 预发已跑通（14m），下一步应为**正式环境执行**（分析）\n- 迁移完成后才能解锁**灰度开关**与**回退演练**两个 pending 项\n\n---\n\n## ⚠️ 需关注（基于材料的分析）\n\n- **回退演练**草案已提交但**缺少数据校验步骤**，建议补齐后再进入演练排期（分析）\n- **灰度开关**当前在等待安全评审排期（10-09 起已 2 天无更新），可能成为后续瓶颈（分析）\n\n---\n\n## 📎 已有产物\n\n- 需求清单 v3（doc）\n- 迁移脚本 runbook（doc）\n- 评审纪要 10-11（doc）", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 6.3, + "raw_markdown": "The user wants a quick view of task status and next step. I'll create a Markdown card based only on the materials provided, clearly marking any analysis as such.\n\nLet me organize:\n- Steps status: 需求冻结 done, 契约定义 done, 存储迁移 in_progress, 灰度开关 pending, 回退演练 pending\n- Recent log entries with dates\n- Artifacts list\n\nI need to present this cleanly. The user wants to know:\n1. Where it stands now\n2. What's next\n\nI'll structure as a status card with progress, next step, and risk notes (marked as analysis).\n\n# 任务进度卡片：交付门禁自动化（eval/to-00）\n\n## 📊 当前进度\n\n| 步骤 | 状态 |\n|---|---|\n| 需求冻结 | ✅ done |\n| 契约定义 | ✅ done（10-11 评审通过，含两处字段口径修订） |\n| **存储迁移** | 🔄 **in_progress** |\n| 灰度开关 | ⏳ pending |\n| 回退演练 | ⏳ pending |\n\n整体完成度：2/5 done + 1 in_progress（分析：约 60%，处于中后段）\n\n---\n\n## 🎯 下一步\n\n**主路径**：推进**存储迁移**收尾\n- 预发已跑通（14m），下一步应为**正式环境执行**（分析）\n- 迁移完成后才能解锁**灰度开关**与**回退演练**两个 pending 项\n\n---\n\n## ⚠️ 需关注（基于材料的分析）\n\n- **回退演练**草案已提交但**缺少数据校验步骤**，建议补齐后再进入演练排期（分析）\n- **灰度开关**当前在等待安全评审排期（10-09 起已 2 天无更新），可能成为后续瓶颈（分析）\n\n---\n\n## 📎 已有产物\n\n- 需求清单 v3（doc）\n- 迁移脚本 runbook（doc）\n- 评审纪要 10-11（doc）", + "think_stripped": true +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-02.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-02.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..23f1f7c8 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-02.json @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +{ + "task": "to-02", + "family": "task-overview", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "risk", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 1738, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 446, + "completion_tokens": 1292, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 0 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 14.36 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "# 交付门禁自动化 · 风险与欠账视图\n\n## 🔴 卡住 / 阻塞\n- **灰度开关**：10-09 起等待安全评审排期，至今无排期落地——是当前最明确的外部阻塞。\n- **存储迁移** in_progress：预发 10-08 跑通（14m），但**无生产执行记录**，整体步骤仍处于\"进行中\"。（分析：14m 在生产可能因数据量级放大而超时，需关注执行窗口与回退联动。）\n\n## 🟡 欠账 / 缺失\n- **回退演练草案不完整**：10-10 提交时缺少\"数据校验步骤\"——回退没有校验等于盲退。（分析：高风险欠账，直接影响\"门禁自动化\"的可信度。）\n- **灰度开关相关产物空缺**：当前 artifacts 中无灰度 runbook / 灰度评审纪要，仅有一句话排期请求。\n- **存储迁移生产侧 runbook 状态未沉淀**：仅有\"迁移脚本 runbook\"，生产切换细则、数据校验点、负责人未在产物中显式固化。\n- **契约字段口径修订的下游同步**：10-11 评审通过\"两处字段口径修订\"，未记录下游消费方确认情况。（分析：潜在隐式欠账，门禁场景下口径不一致会直接放行错误流量。）\n\n## ⚫ 滞后 / 过期项\n| 项 | 最近动态 | 距今未推进 |\n|---|---|---|\n| 灰度开关排期 | 10-09 | ≥2 天 |\n| 回退演练补交 | 10-10 被指出缺数据校验 | ≥1 天未见补交 |\n| 存储迁移生产落地 | 10-08 预发跑通 | 步骤仍 pending 生产 |\n\n## 产物快照\n| 产物 | 备注 |\n|---|---|\n| 需求清单 v3 | 冻结基线 |\n| 迁移脚本 runbook | 仅覆盖预发场景 |\n| 评审纪要 10-11 | 契约侧，含字段修订 |\n\n**建议关注顺序（分析）**：① 推动安全评审排期解除灰度阻塞 ② 补齐回退演练的数据校验 ③ 沉淀生产侧 runbook ④ 字段口径修订下游确认。", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 14.4, + "raw_markdown": "The user wants a risk and debt view (风险与欠账视图) for the task \"交付门禁自动化\". I need to extract from the materials what is stuck, what is missing, and what is overdue.\n\nLet me analyze the materials:\n\n**Task steps status:**\n- 需求冻结：done\n- 契约定义：done\n- 存储迁移：in_progress\n- 灰度开关：pending\n- 回退演练：pending\n\n**Recent log:**\n- 10-08 09:12 存储迁移脚本在预发跑通，耗时 14m\n- 10-09 15:40 灰度开关等待安全评审排期\n- 10-10 11:05 回退演练草案提交，缺少数据校验步骤\n- 10-11 10:30 契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订\n\n**Artifacts:**\n- 需求清单 v3（doc）\n- 迁移脚本 runbook（doc）\n- 评审纪要 10-11（doc）\n\nNow let me identify risks and debts:\n\n**卡住 (Stuck):**\n- 灰度开关 pending，等待安全评审排期 - 这是阻塞点\n- 存储迁移 in_progress，虽然预发跑通了，但正式可能还没做\n\n**缺什么 (Missing):**\n- 回退演练草案缺少数据校验步骤\n- 没有看到回退演练的完整产出\n- 灰度开关相关产物缺失（没有提到灰度开关的runbook或产物）\n\n**过期项 (Overdue):**\n- 11已经过了（假设当前是10月12日之后），但灰度开关和回退演练都还pending\n- 存储迁移从10-08预发跑通到现在还没推进到生产/正式\n\nLet me organize this into a Markdown card format. The output should be just the card content, no extra explanations. I need to label analysis/judgments as such.\n\nLet me think about the date - we have entries from 10-08 to 10-11. The user is asking now, so likely current date is after 10-11. Let me assume a reasonable current context.\n\nLet me draft the card:\n\n# 交付门禁自动化 · 风险与欠账视图\n\n## 🔴 卡住 / 阻塞\n- **灰度开关** 等待安全评审排期（10-09 至今未推进），是当前最明确的阻塞点\n- **存储迁移** in_progress：预发已跑通（10-08，14m），但尚无生产执行记录（分析：14m 在生产可能因数据量放大，需关注窗口）\n\n## 🟡 欠账 / 缺失\n- **回退演练草案不完整**：10-10 提交时缺少\"数据校验步骤\"，回退没有数据校验等于裸退（分析：高风险）\n- **灰度开关产物缺失**：当前 artifacts 中无灰度开关 runbook / 评审记录\n- **存储迁移生产 runbook 状态不明**：仅有预发结果，生产侧方案未在 artifacts 中沉淀\n\n## ⚫ 过期 / 滞后\n- **灰度开关** 自 10-09 提出排期需求，2 天无进展（分析：若安全资源紧张，需升级或指定 backup reviewer）\n- **回退演练** 自 10-10 草案被指缺失以来，未见补交记录\n- **契约定义** 10-11 评审通过，但涉及\"两处字段口径修订\"——下游消费方需确认是否同步（潜在欠账）\n\n## 产物快照\n| 产物 | 类型 | 备注 |\n|---|---|---|\n| 需求清单 v3 | doc | 冻结基线 |\n| 迁移脚本 runbook | doc | 预发验证通过 |\n| 评审纪要 10-11 | doc | 契约侧，含字段修订 |\n\nThis looks good. Let me refine it.\n\n# 交付门禁自动化 · 风险与欠账视图\n\n## 🔴 卡住 / 阻塞\n- **灰度开关**：10-09 起等待安全评审排期，至今无排期落地——是当前最明确的外部阻塞。\n- **存储迁移** in_progress：预发 10-08 跑通（14m），但**无生产执行记录**，整体步骤仍处于\"进行中\"。（分析：14m 在生产可能因数据量级放大而超时，需关注执行窗口与回退联动。）\n\n## 🟡 欠账 / 缺失\n- **回退演练草案不完整**：10-10 提交时缺少\"数据校验步骤\"——回退没有校验等于盲退。（分析：高风险欠账，直接影响\"门禁自动化\"的可信度。）\n- **灰度开关相关产物空缺**：当前 artifacts 中无灰度 runbook / 灰度评审纪要，仅有一句话排期请求。\n- **存储迁移生产侧 runbook 状态未沉淀**：仅有\"迁移脚本 runbook\"，生产切换细则、数据校验点、负责人未在产物中显式固化。\n- **契约字段口径修订的下游同步**：10-11 评审通过\"两处字段口径修订\"，未记录下游消费方确认情况。（分析：潜在隐式欠账，门禁场景下口径不一致会直接放行错误流量。）\n\n## ⚫ 滞后 / 过期项\n| 项 | 最近动态 | 距今未推进 |\n|---|---|---|\n| 灰度开关排期 | 10-09 | ≥2 天 |\n| 回退演练补交 | 10-10 被指出缺数据校验 | ≥1 天未见补交 |\n| 存储迁移生产落地 | 10-08 预发跑通 | 步骤仍 pending 生产 |\n\n## 产物快照\n| 产物 | 备注 |\n|---|---|\n| 需求清单 v3 | 冻结基线 |\n| 迁移脚本 runbook | 仅覆盖预发场景 |\n| 评审纪要 10-11 | 契约侧，含字段修订 |\n\n**建议关注顺序（分析）**：① 推动安全评审排期解除灰度阻塞 ② 补齐回退演练的数据校验 ③ 沉淀生产侧 runbook ④ 字段口径修订下游确认。", + "think_stripped": true +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-03.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-03.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..5ba878f6 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-03.json @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +{ + "task": "to-03", + "family": "task-overview", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "handover", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 1885, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 445, + "completion_tokens": 1440, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 881 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 8.53 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "# 交接页：交付门禁自动化\n\n## 一、背景\n- **任务名称**：交付门禁自动化\n- **目标**：通过自动化手段把控交付（上线）门禁，覆盖需求冻结、契约定义、存储迁移、灰度开关、回退演练等环节。\n- **当前阶段**：前期两项已完成，存储迁移进行中，灰度与回退尚未启动。\n\n## 二、当前状态\n\n| 步骤 | 状态 | 备注 |\n|---|---|---|\n| 需求冻结 | ✅ 已完成 | — |\n| 契约定义 | ✅ 已完成 | 10-11 评审通过，含两处字段口径修订 |\n| 存储迁移 | 🔵 进行中 | 10-08 预发跑通，耗时 14 分钟 |\n| 灰度开关 | ⏳ 待启动 | 等安全评审排期 |\n| 回退演练 | ⏳ 待启动 | 草案已提交，**缺少数据校验步骤** |\n\n## 三、已交付产物\n- 需求清单 v3（doc）\n- 迁移脚本 runbook（doc）\n- 评审纪要 10-11（doc）\n\n## 四、近期动态（时间线）\n- **10-08 09:12** 存储迁移脚本预发跑通，14 分钟\n- **10-09 15:40** 灰度开关等安全评审排期\n- **10-10 11:05** 回退演练草案提交，缺数据校验步骤\n- **10-11 10:30** 契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订\n\n## 五、接手事项（建议优先级）\n\n1. **回退演练补齐** ⭐优先级高\n 草案已交但缺数据校验步骤，建议先补齐校验环节再推进演练。\n\n2. **灰度开关催办**\n 跟进安全评审排期，明确评审时间窗；评审通过后即可启动开关配置。\n\n3. **存储迁移后续推进**（分析）\n 预发已跑通，下一步通常为生产环境部署或扩大灰度范围；具体路径需与当前负责人确认。\n\n4. **契约修订对齐**（分析）\n 契约定义虽已完成，但存在两处字段口径修订，建议在下游消费方/迁移脚本中核对修订是否已同步，避免口径不一致。\n\n## 七、注意事项\n- 三份产物（需求清单 v3、迁移 runbook、10-11 评审纪要）为当前唯一可追溯的文档基线，修改前请先确认是否需要同步更新版本号。\n- 灰度与回退两项均依赖安全/数据校验节点，**不建议绕过这两步直接进生产**。", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 8.5, + "raw_markdown": "The user wants me to organize the given materials into a handover page so that a new colleague can understand the background, current status, and what to pick up. The output should be a Markdown card.\n\nLet me analyze the materials:\n\n**Background (背景)**:\n- Task: 交付门禁自动化 (Delivery Gate Automation)\n- Requirements freezing: done\n- Contract definition: done\n- This appears to be an automation task for delivery gating/checkpoint\n\n**Current Status (当前状态)**:\n- Storage migration: in_progress\n- Gradual rollout switch: pending\n- Rollback drill: pending\n\n**Recent dynamics (log)**:\n- 10-08 09:12: Migration script passed in pre-production, took 14m\n- 10-09 15:40: Gradual rollout switch waiting for security review scheduling\n- 10-10 11:05: Rollback drill draft submitted, missing data validation step\n- 10-11 10:30: Contract definition review passed, two field specification revisions\n\n**Artifacts (产物)**:\n- Requirements list v3 (doc)\n- Migration script runbook (doc)\n- Review minutes 10-11 (doc)\n\n**Pickup items (接手事项)**:\nNeed to infer:\n1. Storage migration: follow up on in-progress item\n2. Gradual rollout switch: needs security review scheduling follow-up\n3. Rollback drill: draft submitted but missing data validation steps - need to add\n4. Contract definition: review passed but with two field revisions - need to be aware of these changes\n\nLet me organize this into a clean handover Markdown card.\n\nFormat: Markdown card\n\nI should:\n- Use only facts from materials\n- Mark analysis/judgments as such (口头标明是分析)\n- Output is just the card content, no extra explanation\n\nLet me structure:\n\n# 交接页：交付门禁自动化\n\n## 背景\n- 任务目标：交付门禁自动化\n- 范围：覆盖需求冻结、契约定义、存储迁移、灰度开关、回退演练\n\n## 当前状态\n- 需求冻结：已完成\n- 契约定义：已完成（10-11 评审通过，含两处字段口径修订）\n- 存储迁移：进行中（预发已跑通，耗时 14 分钟）\n- 灰度开关：待启动（等安全评审排期）\n- 回退演练：待启动（草案已提交，缺数据校验步骤）\n\n## 已交付产物\n- 需求清单 v3（doc）\n- 迁移脚本 runbook（doc）\n- 评审纪要 10-11（doc）\n\n## 接手事项\n（按优先级/依赖关系列出）\n\n1. 灰度开关：跟进安全评审排期，待排期确定后启动\n2. 回退演练：补齐数据校验步骤，完整方案待定稿\n3. 存储迁移：跟进预发跑通后的生产部署（分析：预发已通，下一步通常推进生产，但材料未明确，待与负责人确认）\n4. 契约定义：留意两处字段口径修订的影响范围（分析：合同已通过但有修订，建议在下游使用时核对口径）\n\n## 时间线（最近动态）\n- 10-08：迁移脚本预发跑通（14m）\n- 10-09：灰度开关等安全评审\n- 10-10：回退演练草案提交（缺校验）\n- 10-11：契约定义评审通过（两处字段修订）\n\nLet me refine and make sure I'm being accurate. I should mark \"分析\" clearly.\n\nLet me reconsider - the user wants this to be clean and useful for a new colleague. I should structure it well.\n\nLet me think about what the \"接手事项\" really are based on the materials:\n\n1. 存储迁移 in_progress - 预发已跑通，意味着下一步可能要做生产部署或继续优化\n2. 灰度开关 pending - 等安全评审排期，需要跟进催办或准备评审材料\n3. 回退演练 pending - 草案已提交但缺数据校验步骤，需要补齐\n4. 契约定义已 done，但有两处字段口径修订 - 需要留意影响\n\nI'll mark the inferences about next steps as \"分析\" since they're not directly stated.\n\n# 交接页：交付门禁自动化\n\n## 一、背景\n- **任务名称**：交付门禁自动化\n- **目标**：通过自动化手段把控交付（上线）门禁，覆盖需求冻结、契约定义、存储迁移、灰度开关、回退演练等环节。\n- **当前阶段**：前期两项已完成，存储迁移进行中，灰度与回退尚未启动。\n\n## 二、当前状态\n\n| 步骤 | 状态 | 备注 |\n|---|---|---|\n| 需求冻结 | ✅ 已完成 | — |\n| 契约定义 | ✅ 已完成 | 10-11 评审通过，含两处字段口径修订 |\n| 存储迁移 | 🔵 进行中 | 10-08 预发跑通，耗时 14 分钟 |\n| 灰度开关 | ⏳ 待启动 | 等安全评审排期 |\n| 回退演练 | ⏳ 待启动 | 草案已提交，**缺少数据校验步骤** |\n\n## 三、已交付产物\n- 需求清单 v3（doc）\n- 迁移脚本 runbook（doc）\n- 评审纪要 10-11（doc）\n\n## 四、近期动态（时间线）\n- **10-08 09:12** 存储迁移脚本预发跑通，14 分钟\n- **10-09 15:40** 灰度开关等安全评审排期\n- **10-10 11:05** 回退演练草案提交，缺数据校验步骤\n- **10-11 10:30** 契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订\n\n## 五、接手事项（建议优先级）\n\n1. **回退演练补齐** ⭐优先级高\n 草案已交但缺数据校验步骤，建议先补齐校验环节再推进演练。\n\n2. **灰度开关催办**\n 跟进安全评审排期，明确评审时间窗；评审通过后即可启动开关配置。\n\n3. **存储迁移后续推进**（分析）\n 预发已跑通，下一步通常为生产环境部署或扩大灰度范围；具体路径需与当前负责人确认。\n\n4. **契约修订对齐**（分析）\n 契约定义虽已完成，但存在两处字段口径修订，建议在下游消费方/迁移脚本中核对修订是否已同步，避免口径不一致。\n\n## 七、注意事项\n- 三份产物（需求清单 v3、迁移 runbook、10-11 评审纪要）为当前唯一可追溯的文档基线，修改前请先确认是否需要同步更新版本号。\n- 灰度与回退两项均依赖安全/数据校验节点，**不建议绕过这两步直接进生产**。", + "think_stripped": true +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-04.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-04.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..77479d17 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-04.json @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +{ + "task": "to-04", + "family": "task-overview", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "progress", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 1139, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 440, + "completion_tokens": 699, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 0 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 0 + } + }, + "latency_s": 7.87 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "## 交付门禁自动化 · 当前进度\n\n**整体：5 步已完成 2，正进行 1，剩余 2** ｜ 最近更新 10-11\n\n### 已完成\n- ✅ **需求冻结**\n- ✅ **契约定义**（10-11 评审通过，含两处字段口径修订）\n\n### 进行中\n- 🔄 **存储迁移** — 10-08 预发跑通，耗时 14m；待正式环境落地\n\n### 下一步\n1. **存储迁移**：预发已验证，建议推进到生产执行（runbook 已就绪）\n2. **灰度开关**：待安全评审排期——*分析：这是当前最大的排期阻塞点*\n3. **回退演练**：草案已交，但**缺少数据校验步骤**——*分析：建议先补齐这一步再走演练*\n\n### 风险与阻塞\n- 🔴 **安全评审排期未定** → 灰度开关无法启动，会延迟整条链路\n- 🟡 **回退演练缺数据校验** → 若不补齐，演练覆盖度不足，上线有隐患\n\n### 已有产物\n- 需求清单 v3 / 迁移脚本 runbook / 评审纪要 10-11\n\n**建议关注顺序**：先把「回退演练·数据校验」补齐 → 跟进安全评审排期 → 推动存储迁移上生产。", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 7.9, + "raw_markdown": "The user wants a quick status update on the \"交付门禁自动化\" task, specifically: where it stands now and what's next.\n\nLet me parse the materials:\n\n**Current status from steps:**\n- 需求冻结: done\n- 契约定义: done\n- 存储迁移: in_progress (current)\n- 灰度开关: pending\n- 回退演练: pending\n\nSo 2/5 done, 1 in progress, 2 pending.\n\n**Recent log highlights:**\n- 10-08: 存储迁移脚本 pre-prod passed, 14m runtime\n- 10-09: 灰度开关 waiting for security review scheduling\n- 10-10: 回退演练 draft submitted, missing data validation step\n- 10-11: 契约定义 review passed, two field spec revisions\n\n**Artifacts:**\n- 需求清单 v3 (doc)\n- 迁移脚本 runbook (doc)\n- 评审纪要 10-11 (doc)\n\n**Analysis for next step:**\n- 存储迁移 is in progress (script ran in pre-prod successfully)\n- The most recent action was 10-11 契约评审通过 - but 契约定义 is already marked done\n- The actual in_progress item is 存储迁移 - pre-prod run succeeded, so likely needs production rollout\n- Next in line is 灰度开关 - but blocked on 安全评审排期 (scheduling)\n- 回退演练 has a known gap: missing data validation step\n\nRisks/blockers:\n1. 灰度开关 blocked by 安全评审排期\n2. 回退演练 has known gap (缺数据校验步骤)\n\nLet me build a Markdown card. The card should be concise and actionable. I should mark analysis/judgments as such.\n\nFormat considerations:\n- Title with status overview\n- Progress section\n- Next step section\n- Risks/blockers section\n- Keep it scannable\n\nLet me write it as a Markdown card body.\n\n## 交付门禁自动化 · 当前进度\n\n**整体：5 步已完成 2，正进行 1，剩余 2** ｜ 最近更新 10-11\n\n### 已完成\n- ✅ **需求冻结**\n- ✅ **契约定义**（10-11 评审通过，含两处字段口径修订）\n\n### 进行中\n- 🔄 **存储迁移** — 10-08 预发跑通，耗时 14m；待正式环境落地\n\n### 下一步\n1. **存储迁移**：预发已验证，建议推进到生产执行（runbook 已就绪）\n2. **灰度开关**：待安全评审排期——*分析：这是当前最大的排期阻塞点*\n3. **回退演练**：草案已交，但**缺少数据校验步骤**——*分析：建议先补齐这一步再走演练*\n\n### 风险与阻塞\n- 🔴 **安全评审排期未定** → 灰度开关无法启动，会延迟整条链路\n- 🟡 **回退演练缺数据校验** → 若不补齐，演练覆盖度不足，上线有隐患\n\n### 已有产物\n- 需求清单 v3 / 迁移脚本 runbook / 评审纪要 10-11\n\n**建议关注顺序**：先把「回退演练·数据校验」补齐 → 跟进安全评审排期 → 推动存储迁移上生产。", + "think_stripped": true +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-05.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-05.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..390b774d --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-05.json @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +{ + "task": "to-05", + "family": "task-overview", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "risk", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 2133, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 446, + "completion_tokens": 1687, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 0 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 14.47 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "## 风险与欠账视图\n\n### 🚧 阻塞项\n- **灰度开关**：pending 状态，自 **10-09** 起等待安全评审排期，至 **10-11** 仍无进展——属外部依赖卡点\n\n### ⚠️ 缺口\n- **回退演练**：草案 10-10 已提交，但**缺少\"数据校验步骤\"**——回退后无法验证数据一致性\n- **存储迁移**：in_progress 持续中，10-08 预发跑通（耗时 14m）后，**未见正式完成记录或生产执行记录**\n\n### 📄 产物覆盖\n- 已有：需求清单 v3、迁移脚本 runbook、评审纪要 10-11\n- 材料中未见：回退演练正式文档、灰度安全评审纪要、契约字段口径修订后的新版本\n\n### 🕐 陈旧 / 待推动项（分析）\n基于日志时间线，以下事项处于停滞或未闭环状态：\n| 事项 | 最近动态 | 持续时间 | 判断 |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| 灰度开关等排期 | 10-09 | ≥2 天 | 外部依赖阻塞，建议主动跟进评审日程 |\n| 回退演练缺数据校验 | 10-10 | ≥1 天 | 自身交付不完整，未闭环 |\n| 存储迁移未收尾 | 10-08 | ≥3 天 | 仅有预发跑通记录，缺生产执行与完成判定 |\n\n### 💡 建议优先级（分析）\n1. 先补 **回退演练的数据校验步骤**——回退是底线能力，缺口直接放大风险\n2. 推动 **安全评审排期落地**——灰度开关是后续放量前置条件\n3. 明确 **存储迁移的生产完成标准**，避免\"预发跑通\"被误认作\"已交付\"", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 14.5, + "raw_markdown": "The user wants a risk and backlog view. Let me analyze the materials carefully.\n\nThe task is \"交付门禁自动化\" (Delivery Gate Automation) with 5 steps:\n- 需求冻结: done\n- 契约定义: done\n- 存储迁移: in_progress\n- 灰度开关: pending\n- 回退演练: pending\n\nRecent dynamics (log):\n- 10-08 09:12: 迁移脚本在预发跑通，耗时 14m (storage migration script passed in pre-prod, took 14 min)\n- 10-09 15:40: 灰度开关等待安全评审排期 (gray release switch waiting for security review scheduling)\n- 10-10 11:05: 回退演练草案提交，缺少数据校验步骤 (rollback drill draft submitted, lacking data validation steps)\n- 10-11 10:30: 契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订 (contract definition review passed, two field spec revisions)\n\nArtifacts:\n- 需求清单 v3 (doc)\n- 迁移脚本 runbook (doc)\n- 评审纪要 10-11 (doc)\n\nNow I need to identify:\n1. 哪里卡住了 (What's blocked) - 灰度开关等待安全评审排期\n2. 缺什么 (What's missing) - 回退演练草案缺少数据校验步骤\n3. 有什么过期项 (What's overdue/stale) - This requires judgment. I need to be careful here.\n\nLooking at potential overdue items:\n- 存储迁移 has been \"in_progress\" since at least 10-08 when the script ran in pre-prod. It's now past 10-11, and 存储迁移 is still in_progress. That's 3+ days.\n- The 迁移脚本 runbook exists but it's not clear if production migration has happened.\n\nWait, I should be careful about \"过期项\" (overdue items). I don't have explicit due dates in the materials. But I can analyze:\n- 10-09 灰度开关等待安全评审排期 - this has been waiting since 10-09, by 10-11 that's 2+ days without resolution\n- 10-10 回退演练草案提交 but missing data validation steps - submitted but incomplete\n\nLet me think about what's actually \"过期\" or stale. The materials don't give explicit deadlines. But I can analyze:\n- The 灰度开关 has been blocked since 10-09 waiting for security review scheduling — this is a scheduling bottleneck that's been stale for 2+ days\n- The 回退演练 has been pending but its draft was submitted 10-10 with gaps — stale/incomplete for 1+ day\n- 存储迁移 in_progress since before/at 10-08, still not done by 10-11 — stalled for 3+ days\n\nActually, let me be careful. The user asked for risks and backlog. I should:\n1. Clearly mark analysis/judgment as analysis\n2. Only use facts from materials\n3. Not fabricate deadlines\n\nLet me structure the card:\n\n## 风险与欠账视图\n\n### 🚧 阻塞 / 卡点\n- 灰度开关 pending 中，等待安全评审排期（自 10-09 起未见进展）\n\n### ⚠️ 缺失 / 不完整\n- 回退演练：草案已提交（10-10），但缺少数据校验步骤\n- 存储迁移：in_progress 状态已持续多日（10-08 预发跑通后未观察到完成标志）\n\n### 📋 待澄清\n- 契约定义 10-11 评审通过，但有两处字段口径修订——修订内容未在产物清单中体现新版本\n\n### 🕐 潜在过期项（分析）\n- 灰度开关：自 10-09 记录以来无新进展，至少 2 天未见推进（基于材料日志的最新记录为 10-11）\n- 回退演练：草案 10-10 提交，缺数据校验步骤，已超 1 天未补齐\n- 存储迁移：10-08 预发跑通后，至 10-11 仍为 in_progress，无正式完成记录\n\n### 产物覆盖情况\n已有：需求清单 v3、迁移脚本 runbook、评审纪要 10-11\n缺失（分析）：回退演练正式 runbook、安全评审纪要、字段口径修订后的契约 vN+1\n\nLet me make this clean and well-structured. The user wants a Markdown card.\n\nActually, I should be more careful. Let me re-read: \"有什么过期项\" — what's overdue. The materials don't explicitly state due dates or \"overdue\" labels. So my judgment about \"过期\" is analysis. I need to clearly mark this as analysis.\n\nLet me refine the card:\n\n---\n\n## 风险与欠账视图\n\n### 🚧 阻塞项\n- **灰度开关**：pending 状态，自 10-09 起等待安全评审排期，至 10-11 仍无进展\n\n### ⚠️ 缺口\n- **回退演练**：草案 10-10 已提交，但缺少\"数据校验步骤\"——回退后无法验证数据一致性\n- **存储迁移**：in_progress 持续中（10-08 预发跑通 14m 后，未见正式完成记录或生产执行记录）\n\n### 📄 产物覆盖\n已有：需求清单 v3、迁移脚本 runbook、评审纪要 10-11\n未见（基于材料）：回退演练正式文档、灰度开关的评审纪要、契约字段口径修订后的版本\n\n### 🕐 陈旧/待推动项（分析）\n基于日志时间线，以下事项处于停滞或未闭环状态，可能影响后续节点启动：\n- 灰度开关卡在\"等排期\"已 2 天（10-09 → 10-11），属外部依赖阻塞\n- 回退演练缺数据校验环节已 1 天（10-10 → 10-11），属于自身交付不完整\n- 存储迁移 10-08 预发跑通后无后续里程碑记录，建议补充生产执行计划与完成判定标准\n\n---\n\nI think this is good. Let me finalize.\n\n## 风险与欠账视图\n\n### 🚧 阻塞项\n- **灰度开关**：pending 状态，自 **10-09** 起等待安全评审排期，至 **10-11** 仍无进展——属外部依赖卡点\n\n### ⚠️ 缺口\n- **回退演练**：草案 10-10 已提交，但**缺少\"数据校验步骤\"**——回退后无法验证数据一致性\n- **存储迁移**：in_progress 持续中，10-08 预发跑通（耗时 14m）后，**未见正式完成记录或生产执行记录**\n\n### 📄 产物覆盖\n- 已有：需求清单 v3、迁移脚本 runbook、评审纪要 10-11\n- 材料中未见：回退演练正式文档、灰度安全评审纪要、契约字段口径修订后的新版本\n\n### 🕐 陈旧 / 待推动项（分析）\n基于日志时间线，以下事项处于停滞或未闭环状态：\n| 事项 | 最近动态 | 持续时间 | 判断 |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| 灰度开关等排期 | 10-09 | ≥2 天 | 外部依赖阻塞，建议主动跟进评审日程 |\n| 回退演练缺数据校验 | 10-10 | ≥1 天 | 自身交付不完整，未闭环 |\n| 存储迁移未收尾 | 10-08 | ≥3 天 | 仅有预发跑通记录，缺生产执行与完成判定 |\n\n### 💡 建议优先级（分析）\n1. 先补 **回退演练的数据校验步骤**——回退是底线能力，缺口直接放大风险\n2. 推动 **安全评审排期落地**——灰度开关是后续放量前置条件\n3. 明确 **存储迁移的生产完成标准**，避免\"预发跑通\"被误认作\"已交付\"", + "think_stripped": true +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-06.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-06.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..bbfe9f48 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-06.json @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +{ + "task": "to-06", + "family": "task-overview", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "handover", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 1363, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 445, + "completion_tokens": 918, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 8.96 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "# 任务交接页：交付门禁自动化\n\n## 一、任务背景\n\n「交付门禁自动化」共拆分为 5 个步骤，当前整体处于中后段：前两步已完成，中间一步在跑，后两步未启动。\n\n| 步骤 | 状态 |\n| --- | --- |\n| 需求冻结 | ✅ done |\n| 契约定义 | ✅ done |\n| 存储迁移 | 🟡 in_progress |\n| 灰度开关 | ⏳ pending |\n| 回退演练 | ⏳ pending |\n\n## 二、当前状态要点\n\n- **契约定义（done）**：10-11 评审通过；存在两处字段口径修订，需留意后续接入方是否已同步到最新版本。\n- **存储迁移（in_progress）**：10-08 迁移脚本在预发环境跑通，耗时 14 分钟。预发已验证，尚未看到正式环境执行记录。\n- **灰度开关（pending）**：10-09 正在等待安全评审排期，是当前的外部依赖。\n- **回退演练（pending）**：10-10 草案已提交，但**缺少数据校验步骤**。\n\n## 三、接手事项（按优先级）\n\n1. **推进存储迁移落地**：预发已通，需排定正式环境执行窗口与变更窗口。\n2. **跟催灰度开关的安全评审**：10-09 起在等排期，建议主动确认评审人/时间。\n3. **补齐回退演练草案**：重点补\"数据校验步骤\"，再走评审。\n4. **同步契约口径修订**：两处字段口径变化需告知下游接入方，避免上线后不一致。\n\n> 以上排序基于材料中各事项的紧迫信号（外部依赖、草案缺陷）得出，属于分析建议。\n\n## 四、产物索引\n\n- 📄 需求清单 v3（doc）\n- 📄 迁移脚本 runbook（doc）\n- 📄 评审纪要 10-11（doc）\n\n> ⚠️ 提示：灰度开关与回退演练目前**没有对应的正式产物**列在制品清单中，移交时建议一并确认是否遗漏归档。\n\n## 五、移交前请交接人确认\n\n- [ ] 正式环境存储迁移的排期是否已对齐？\n- [ ] 安全评审联系人是否已确认？\n- [ ] 回退演练中的\"数据校验步骤\"归属谁负责补齐？", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 9.0, + "raw_markdown": "The user wants me to organize the given materials into a handover page that helps new colleagues understand the background, current status, and items to take over. Let me analyze the materials carefully.\n\nFrom the materials:\n1. Task name: 交付门禁自动化 (Delivery Gate Automation)\n2. Steps status:\n - 需求冻结 (Requirements Freeze): done\n - 契约定义 (Contract Definition): done\n - 存储迁移 (Storage Migration): in_progress\n - 灰度开关 (Grayscale Switch): pending\n - 回退演练 (Rollback Drill): pending\n\n3. Recent dynamics:\n - 10-08 09:12: Storage migration script ran successfully in pre-production, took 14 minutes\n - 10-09 15:40: Grayscale switch is waiting for security review scheduling\n - 10-10 11:05: Rollback drill draft submitted, lacks data validation steps\n - 10-11 10:30: Contract definition review passed, two field caliber revisions\n\n4. Artifacts:\n - Requirements list v3 (doc)\n - Migration script runbook (doc)\n - Review minutes 10-11 (doc)\n\nLet me organize this into a handover page. I need to:\n1. Cover background (what the task is)\n2. Current status (where things stand)\n3. Handover items (what needs to be done)\n\nI should use only facts from the materials and mark analyses/recommendations as such. Output should be a Markdown card with no extra explanation.\n\nLet me structure it:\n\n## 任务交接页：交付门禁自动化\n\n### 背景\n- 任务：交付门禁自动化\n- 阶段：进行中（5 个步骤）\n- 完成：需求冻结、契约定义\n- 进行中：存储迁移\n- 待启动：灰度开关、回退演练\n\n### 当前状态（按步骤）\n...\n\n### 接手事项 / 待办\n...\n\n### 产物索引\n...\n\n### 分析与建议\n...\n\nLet me draft this carefully.\n\n# 任务交接页：交付门禁自动化\n\n## 一、任务背景\n\n「交付门禁自动化」共拆分为 5 个步骤，当前整体处于中后段：前两步已完成，中间一步在跑，后两步未启动。\n\n| 步骤 | 状态 |\n| --- | --- |\n| 需求冻结 | ✅ done |\n| 契约定义 | ✅ done |\n| 存储迁移 | 🟡 in_progress |\n| 灰度开关 | ⏳ pending |\n| 回退演练 | ⏳ pending |\n\n## 二、当前状态要点\n\n- **契约定义（done）**：10-11 评审通过；存在两处字段口径修订，需留意后续接入方是否已同步到最新版本。\n- **存储迁移（in_progress）**：10-08 迁移脚本在预发环境跑通，耗时 14 分钟。预发已验证，尚未看到正式环境执行记录。\n- **灰度开关（pending）**：10-09 正在等待安全评审排期，是当前的外部依赖。\n- **回退演练（pending）**：10-10 草案已提交，但**缺少数据校验步骤**。\n\n## 三、接手事项（按优先级）\n\n1. **推进存储迁移落地**：预发已通，需排定正式环境执行窗口与变更窗口。\n2. **跟催灰度开关的安全评审**：10-09 起在等排期，建议主动确认评审人/时间。\n3. **补齐回退演练草案**：重点补\"数据校验步骤\"，再走评审。\n4. **同步契约口径修订**：两处字段口径变化需告知下游接入方，避免上线后不一致。\n\n> 以上排序基于材料中各事项的紧迫信号（外部依赖、草案缺陷）得出，属于分析建议。\n\n## 四、产物索引\n\n- 📄 需求清单 v3（doc）\n- 📄 迁移脚本 runbook（doc）\n- 📄 评审纪要 10-11（doc）\n\n> ⚠️ 提示：灰度开关与回退演练目前**没有对应的正式产物**列在制品清单中，移交时建议一并确认是否遗漏归档。\n\n## 五、移交前请交接人确认\n\n- [ ] 正式环境存储迁移的排期是否已对齐？\n- [ ] 安全评审联系人是否已确认？\n- [ ] 回退演练中的\"数据校验步骤\"归属谁负责补齐？", + "think_stripped": true +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-07.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-07.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..dcba24bb --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-07.json @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +{ + "task": "to-07", + "family": "task-overview", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "progress", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 1362, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 440, + "completion_tokens": 922, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 10.11 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "# 任务：交付门禁自动化（to-06）\n\n## 📍 进度概览\n\n| 步骤 | 状态 | 说明 |\n|---|---|---|\n| 需求冻结 | ✅ done | — |\n| 契约定义 | ✅ done | 10-11 评审通过，含两处字段口径修订 |\n| 存储迁移 | 🔄 in_progress | 预发 14m 通过 |\n| 灰度开关 | ⏸ pending | 等待安全评审排期 |\n| 回退演练 | ⏸ pending | 草案已提交，缺数据校验步骤 |\n\n## ⏭ 下一步\n\n1. **存储迁移**：推进到正式环境收尾（分析：预发已跑通，属于就绪状态）\n2. **回退演练**：在草案中补齐数据校验步骤后再提交\n3. **灰度开关**：跟进安全评审排期（分析：此为外部依赖，应尽早推动）\n\n## ⚠ 风险提示（分析）\n\n- **外部依赖**：灰度开关卡在安全评审排期，时间不可控，建议主动对齐评审方\n- **方案不完备**：回退演练缺数据校验步骤，演练结果可信度受影响，需先补齐\n- **建议顺序**：先补回退校验 → 再排安全评审 → 演练通过后开灰度\n\n## 📎 产物\n\n- 需求清单 v3\n- 迁移脚本 runbook\n- 评审纪要 10-11", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 10.1, + "raw_markdown": "The user wants a quick status card for the task \"交付门禁自动化\" (Delivery Gate Automation). They want to know:\n1. Where the task is now (progress)\n2. What's the next step\n\nLet me synthesize the information from the three sources:\n\n**Steps status:**\n- 需求冻结 (Requirements freeze): done\n- 契约定义 (Contract definition): done\n- 存储迁移 (Storage migration): in_progress\n- 灰度开关 (Gray release switch): pending\n- 回退演练 (Rollback drill): pending\n\n**Recent log:**\n- 10-08: Storage migration script ran successfully in staging, took 14m\n- 10-09: Gray release switch waiting for security review scheduling\n- 10-10: Rollback drill draft submitted, missing data validation step\n- 10-11: Contract definition review approved, with two field definition revisions\n\n**Artifacts:**\n- 需求清单 v3 (Requirements list v3)\n- 迁移脚本 runbook (Migration script runbook)\n- 评审纪要 10-11 (Review minutes 10-11)\n\nKey analysis for the card:\n- Current phase: Storage migration (in progress, already ran in staging in 14m - so this is going well)\n- Blockers/risks I can identify:\n - Gray release switch is pending security review scheduling (potential external dependency)\n - Rollback drill draft lacks data validation step (need to add this)\n- Next step: Storage migration completion, then gray switch needs security review, and rollback needs data validation added\n\nThe user wants a Markdown card format. Let me structure this clearly with:\n- Status overview\n- Current phase detail\n- Next steps (concrete)\n- Risks/blocks (analytical, since I'm inferring)\n\nI need to label any analytical/judgment content as such (口头标明是分析).\n\nLet me draft:\n\n## 任务：交付门禁自动化\n\n**进度概览**\n- ✅ 需求冻结\n- ✅ 契约定义（10-11 评审通过，含两处字段口径修订）\n- 🔄 存储迁移（预发 14m 通过，进行中）\n- ⏸ 灰度开关（待安全评审排期）\n- ⏸ 回退演练（草案已提交，缺少数据校验步骤）\n\n**下一步**\n1. 完成存储迁移（分析：预发已跑通，可推进正式环境）\n2. 回退演练草案需补齐数据校验步骤\n3. 跟进安全评审排期，解锁灰度开关\n\n**风险与阻塞（分析）**\n- 灰度开关受限于安全评审排期，属外部依赖，存在时间不确定\n- 回退演练缺少数据校验步骤，演练方案未完备，需先补齐再演练\n\n**产物**\n- 需求清单 v3\n- 迁移脚本 runbook\n- 评审纪要 10-11\n\nThis is concise and addresses both \"where we are\" and \"next steps.\" Let me refine it.\n\n# 任务：交付门禁自动化（to-06）\n\n## 📍 进度概览\n\n| 步骤 | 状态 | 说明 |\n|---|---|---|\n| 需求冻结 | ✅ done | — |\n| 契约定义 | ✅ done | 10-11 评审通过，含两处字段口径修订 |\n| 存储迁移 | 🔄 in_progress | 预发 14m 通过 |\n| 灰度开关 | ⏸ pending | 等待安全评审排期 |\n| 回退演练 | ⏸ pending | 草案已提交，缺数据校验步骤 |\n\n## ⏭ 下一步\n\n1. **存储迁移**：推进到正式环境收尾（分析：预发已跑通，属于就绪状态）\n2. **回退演练**：在草案中补齐数据校验步骤后再提交\n3. **灰度开关**：跟进安全评审排期（分析：此为外部依赖，应尽早推动）\n\n## ⚠ 风险提示（分析）\n\n- **外部依赖**：灰度开关卡在安全评审排期，时间不可控，建议主动对齐评审方\n- **方案不完备**：回退演练缺数据校验步骤，演练结果可信度受影响，需先补齐\n- **建议顺序**：先补回退校验 → 再排安全评审 → 演练通过后开灰度\n\n## 📎 产物\n\n- 需求清单 v3\n- 迁移脚本 runbook\n- 评审纪要 10-11", + "think_stripped": true +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-08.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-08.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..40824397 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-08.json @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +{ + "task": "to-08", + "family": "task-overview", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "risk", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 2408, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 446, + "completion_tokens": 1962, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 0 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 23.92 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "## 风险与欠账视图 · 交付门禁自动化（eval/to-07）\n\n### 🔴 卡点（阻塞中）\n- **灰度开关**：`pending`，最近动态 10-09，等待安全评审排期；属外部依赖，当前无排期落地信息\n- **回退演练**：`pending`，草案 10-10 已提交但**缺数据校验步骤**，至今未补齐\n\n### 🟡 欠账 / 缺口\n- 回退演练中的**数据校验步骤**\n- 安全评审的排期与结论\n- 存储迁移的正式执行（预发已跑通 10-08，耗时 14m，但步骤仍 `in_progress`）\n- 灰度开关对应的评审纪要 / 产出物\n\n### ⚠ 潜在风险（分析）\n- **契约口径漂移**：10-11 契约定义评审通过时含两处字段口径修订，但下游迁移脚本 runbook、回退演练草案均未见同步修订记录，存在上下游口径不一致的隐患\n- **过期判定受限**：材料未给出各步骤截止日期，无法严格判定\"过期\"；只能观察到灰度开关、回退演练两项停滞多日无推进\n\n### 📄 产物盘点\n| 产物 | 状态 |\n|---|---|\n| 需求清单 v3 | ✅ 对应已 done 步骤 |\n| 迁移脚本 runbook | ✅ 存在，但需复核是否对齐 10-11 口径修订 |\n| 评审纪要 10-11 | ✅ 契约评审 |\n| 回退演练 runbook | ❌ 缺失（草案未含数据校验） |\n| 灰度开关评审纪要 | ❌ 缺失 |", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 23.9, + "raw_markdown": "The user wants a risk and backlog view: where is it stuck, what's missing, what's overdue.\n\nLet me analyze the materials:\n\n**Task steps:**\n- 需求冻结：done\n- 契约定义：done\n- 存储迁移：in_progress\n- 灰度开关：pending\n- 回退演练：pending\n\n**Recent dynamics:**\n- 10-08 09:12 存储迁移脚本在预发跑通，耗时 14m\n- 10-09 15:40 灰度开关等待安全评审排期\n- 10-10 11:05 回退演练草案提交，缺少数据校验步骤\n- 10-11 10:30 契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订\n\n**Artifacts:**\n- 需求清单 v3（doc）\n- 迁移脚本 runbook（doc）\n- 评审纪要 10-11（doc）\n\nNow, the user wants a risk and backlog view. Let me identify:\n\n**Where is it stuck (卡点):**\n1. 灰度开关：等待安全评审排期（pending状态，且依赖外部排期）\n2. 回退演练：草案已提交但缺少数据校验步骤\n\n**What's missing (欠账):**\n1. 回退演练缺少数据校验步骤\n2. 灰度开关的安全评审尚未排期\n3. 迁移迁移脚本只有runbook，实际存储迁移仍in_progress（虽然在预发跑通了，但正式迁移还没开始）\n\n**Overdue items (过期项):**\n- Hard to tell exact overdue without knowing deadlines, but I need to be careful not to fabricate.\n- The log entries have dates 10-08 through 10-11. I don't have explicit deadlines stated in the materials. So I shouldn't fabricate overdue items.\n\nWait - the task is eval/to-07. Let me think about what's \"过期\". Without explicit deadlines, I can only note that things have been pending. But I shouldn't fabricate deadlines.\n\nActually, let me reconsider. The \"pending\" status with no end date and external dependency (安全评审排期) could indicate a risk of being overdue, but I shouldn't claim it's actually overdue without evidence.\n\nLet me think more carefully. The user asks for \"过期项\" - what items are overdue. I have no deadline information in the materials. I should note that explicitly - that no explicit deadlines are available, so overdue status cannot be confirmed from the materials.\n\nActually, I can note: items still in \"pending\" status that have not progressed, with last activity dates. For instance:\n- 灰度开关 last touched 10-09, still pending\n- 回退演练 last touched 10-10, still pending with known gap\n\nThese are \"stuck\" not necessarily \"overdue\" without deadlines.\n\nLet me structure the card:\n\n# 风险与欠账视图\n\n## 卡点（阻塞项）\n- **灰度开关**：处于 pending，依赖安全评审排期（最近一次提及 10-09），属外部依赖，无排期信息\n- **回退演练**：草案已提交但**缺少数据校验步骤**（10-10 至今未补齐）\n\n## 欠账（缺失/待补）\n- 回退演练中的数据校验步骤\n- 安全评审排期结果\n- 存储迁移正式执行（预发已跑通，但步骤仍为 in_progress，未正式完成）\n\n## 过期项 / 进展停滞\n分析：材料中未给出各项的截止日期，因此无法判定严格意义上的\"过期\"。但以下事项长时间未推进：\n- 灰度开关自 10-09 等待安全评审排期，至今无排期反馈\n- 回退演练自 10-10 发现缺数据校验步骤，至今未补齐\n\n## 产物完整性\n- 需求清单 v3 ✓（done 步骤支撑）\n- 迁移脚本 runbook ✓\n- 评审纪要 10-11 ✓（契约定义评审）\n- 缺：回退演练正式文档（含数据校验）、灰度开关相关评审纪要\n\nLet me make this cleaner as a markdown card.\n\nFormat: Markdown card with sections. Keep it tight and analytical. Mark judgments as 分析.\n\nLet me draft:\n\n---\n\n## 风险与欠账视图 · task:eval/to-07\n\n### 🔴 卡点\n- **灰度开关**：pending，等待安全评审排期（最近动态 10-09），属外部依赖，无排期信息\n- **回退演练**：pending，草案缺数据校验步骤（10-10 提出，至今未补）\n\n### 🟡 欠账\n- 回退演练的**数据校验步骤**未补齐\n- 安全评审排期未落地\n- 存储迁移预发跑通，但正式迁移步骤仍为 in_progress，未关闭\n\n### ⚪ 过期项\n材料中**未提供各步骤截止日期**，无法严格判定过期。以下为停滞信号（分析）：\n- 灰度开关自 10-09 起等待外部排期，无进展反馈\n- 回退演练自 10-10 发现缺口，无补齐动作\n\n### 📄 产物盘点\n- 需求清单 v3 ✅\n- 迁移脚本 runbook ✅\n- 评审纪要 10-11 ✅\n- 缺失：回退演练正式 runbook、灰度开关评审纪要\n\n---\n\nHmm, let me reconsider - the user asked for a risk/backlog view. I should be more focused. Let me also use the thinking block requirement and max thinking effort.\n\nLet me also consider: should I use emojis? The system prompt says \"Markdown 卡片\" but doesn't restrict formatting. I'll keep it minimal/professional but use some visual hierarchy.\n\nLet me also be careful: \"两处字段口径修订\" in 契约定义评审 - this means there were revisions. Could this affect downstream artifacts? The 迁移脚本 and 回退演练 might need re-validation against new contract. This is a risk I should flag.\n\nAlso: the 契约定义 was revised (字段口径修订), but do downstream artifacts (迁移脚本、回退演练、灰度开关) reflect this revision? This is a potential risk worth noting.\n\nLet me refine:\n\n## 风险与欠账视图 · 交付门禁自动化 (eval/to-07)\n\n### 🔴 卡点（阻塞进行）\n- **灰度开关**：pending，最近动态 10-09，等待安全评审排期，属外部依赖，无排期落地信息\n- **回退演练**：pending，草案已提交（10-10）但缺数据校验步骤，至今未补齐\n\n### 🟡 欠账 / 缺口\n- 回退演练的数据校验步骤\n- 安全评审的排期与结论\n- 存储迁移正式执行（预发已跑通 10-08，耗时 14m，但步骤仍 in_progress）\n- 灰度开关对应的评审纪要 / 产物缺失\n\n### ⚠ 潜在风险（分析）\n- **契约口径漂移**：10-11 契约定义评审通过时有两处字段口径修订，但下游迁移脚本 runbook、回退演练草案均未见同步修订记录，存在口径不一致风险\n- 材料未给出各步骤截止日期，无法判定严格意义的\"过期\"；仅可观察到灰度开关、回退演练两项停滞\n\n### 📄 产物现状\n| 产物 | 状态 |\n|---|---|\n| 需求清单 v3 | ✅ 对应 done 步骤 |\n| 迁移脚本 runbook | ✅ 但需复核是否对齐 10-11 修订 |\n| 评审纪要 10-11 | ✅ 契约评审 |\n| 回退演练 runbook | ❌ 缺失（含数据校验） |\n| 灰度开关评审纪要 | ❌ 缺失 |\n\nThis looks better. Let me finalize.\n\n## 风险与欠账视图 · 交付门禁自动化（eval/to-07）\n\n### 🔴 卡点（阻塞中）\n- **灰度开关**：`pending`，最近动态 10-09，等待安全评审排期；属外部依赖，当前无排期落地信息\n- **回退演练**：`pending`，草案 10-10 已提交但**缺数据校验步骤**，至今未补齐\n\n### 🟡 欠账 / 缺口\n- 回退演练中的**数据校验步骤**\n- 安全评审的排期与结论\n- 存储迁移的正式执行（预发已跑通 10-08，耗时 14m，但步骤仍 `in_progress`）\n- 灰度开关对应的评审纪要 / 产出物\n\n### ⚠ 潜在风险（分析）\n- **契约口径漂移**：10-11 契约定义评审通过时含两处字段口径修订，但下游迁移脚本 runbook、回退演练草案均未见同步修订记录，存在上下游口径不一致的隐患\n- **过期判定受限**：材料未给出各步骤截止日期，无法严格判定\"过期\"；只能观察到灰度开关、回退演练两项停滞多日无推进\n\n### 📄 产物盘点\n| 产物 | 状态 |\n|---|---|\n| 需求清单 v3 | ✅ 对应已 done 步骤 |\n| 迁移脚本 runbook | ✅ 存在，但需复核是否对齐 10-11 口径修订 |\n| 评审纪要 10-11 | ✅ 契约评审 |\n| 回退演练 runbook | ❌ 缺失（草案未含数据校验） |\n| 灰度开关评审纪要 | ❌ 缺失 |", + "think_stripped": true +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-09.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-09.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b4896def --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-09.json @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +{ + "task": "to-09", + "family": "task-overview", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "handover", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 1477, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 445, + "completion_tokens": 1032, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 10.37 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "# 交接页 · 交付门禁自动化\n\n## 1. 任务背景\n- 任务代号：`eval/to-08`（交付门禁自动化）\n- 目标（来自任务名与产物推断，分析）：建立自动化的交付门禁，覆盖需求冻结 → 契约定义 → 存储迁移 → 灰度开关 → 回退演练 五个环节。\n- 已沉淀产物：\n - 需求清单 v3（doc）\n - 迁移脚本 runbook（doc）\n - 评审纪要 10-11（doc）\n\n## 2. 当前状态（步骤面板）\n\n| 步骤 | 状态 | 备注（来自 log） |\n|---|---|---|\n| 需求冻结 | done | — |\n| 契约定义 | done | 10-11 评审通过，有两处字段口径修订 |\n| 存储迁移 | in_progress | 10-08 预发跑通，耗时 14m |\n| 灰度开关 | pending | 10-09 等待安全评审排期 |\n| 回退演练 | pending | 10-10 草案已提交，缺少数据校验步骤 |\n\n## 3. 接手事项（建议优先序）\n\n> 以下\"建议\"为基于材料事实的判断，仅作交接排序参考。\n\n1. **【高】灰度开关**：跟进安全评审排期（10-09 现状：pending 且在等外部排期），这是当前唯一被外部依赖卡住的环节。\n2. **【高】回退演练**：补齐\"数据校验步骤\"（10-10 log 明确点出的缺口），补完后即可推进演练。\n3. **【中】存储迁移**：脚本已在预发跑通（10-08，14m），需确认是否需要走生产验证或闭环为 done。\n4. **【低】契约定义**：已 done，关注 10-11 评审中两处字段口径修订的下游落地即可。\n\n## 4. 接手人建议先读\n1. 需求清单 v3 —— 了解整体范围与口径。\n2. 评审纪要 10-11 —— 了解契约定义最新修订，避免后续脚本/演练遗漏。\n3. 迁移脚本 runbook —— 存储迁移与灰度开关都会涉及执行细节。\n\n## 5. 已知风险与开口项\n- **风险（分析）**：灰度开关完全依赖安全评审排期，排期时间未定，存在阻塞。\n- **风险（分析）**：回退演练的\"数据校验步骤\"具体怎么补、标准是什么，材料未给出，需新同事对齐。\n- **开口项**：存储迁移 in_progress 状态是否仍需保留（例如等待生产环境验证结论），材料未说明，建议确认。", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 10.4, + "raw_markdown": "The user wants me to organize the task information into a handover page so new colleagues can understand the background, current status, and items to take over. I need to use only facts from the materials and mark my analysis/judgments verbally. The output should be a Markdown card directly without extra explanation.\n\nLet me structure the handover page:\n1. Background (from task name and artifacts)\n2. Current status (from steps)\n3. Recent dynamics (from log)\n4. Handover items - things the new colleague needs to pick up\n5. Available artifacts\n\nLet me draft this carefully, sticking strictly to the facts provided.\n\nKey facts:\n- Task name: 交付门禁自动化\n- Steps status:\n - 需求冻结: done\n - 契约定义: done\n - 存储迁移: in_progress\n - 灰度开关: pending\n - 回退演练: pending\n- Recent log:\n - 10-08 09:12 存储迁移脚本在预发跑通，耗时 14m\n - 10-09 15:40 灰度开关等待安全评审排期\n - 10-10 11:05 回退演练草案提交，缺少数据校验步骤\n - 10-11 10:30 契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订\n- Artifacts:\n - 需求清单 v3（doc）\n - 迁移脚本 runbook（doc）\n - 评审纪要 10-11（doc）\n\nAnalysis I'll include (must label as 分析/我的判断):\n- The 存储迁移 is in_progress but the script has run successfully in pre-prod, so this is somewhat between in_progress and almost done\n- 灰度开关 is blocked by 安全评审排期 - this is a blocker\n- 回退演练 needs a missing data validation step added\n\nHandover items I can derive:\n1. 灰度开关: 跟进安全评审排期\n2. 回退演练: 补充数据校验步骤\n3. 存储迁移: 虽然预发跑通但仍标记 in_progress，需要确认后续动作\n4. 契约定义: 跟进两处字段口径修订后的落地\n\nLet me structure this as a clean Markdown card.\n\n# 交接页 · 交付门禁自动化\n\n## 1. 任务背景\n- 任务代号：`eval/to-08`（交付门禁自动化）\n- 目标（来自任务名与产物推断，分析）：建立自动化的交付门禁，覆盖需求冻结 → 契约定义 → 存储迁移 → 灰度开关 → 回退演练 五个环节。\n- 已沉淀产物：\n - 需求清单 v3（doc）\n - 迁移脚本 runbook（doc）\n - 评审纪要 10-11（doc）\n\n## 2. 当前状态（步骤面板）\n\n| 步骤 | 状态 | 备注（来自 log） |\n|---|---|---|\n| 需求冻结 | done | — |\n| 契约定义 | done | 10-11 评审通过，有两处字段口径修订 |\n| 存储迁移 | in_progress | 10-08 预发跑通，耗时 14m |\n| 灰度开关 | pending | 10-09 等待安全评审排期 |\n| 回退演练 | pending | 10-10 草案已提交，缺少数据校验步骤 |\n\n## 3. 接手事项（建议优先序）\n\n> 以下\"建议\"为基于材料事实的判断，仅作交接排序参考。\n\n1. **【高】灰度开关**：跟进安全评审排期（10-09 现状：pending 且在等外部排期），这是当前唯一被外部依赖卡住的环节。\n2. **【高】回退演练**：补齐\"数据校验步骤\"（10-10 log 明确点出的缺口），补完后即可推进演练。\n3. **【中】存储迁移**：脚本已在预发跑通（10-08，14m），需确认是否需要走生产验证或闭环为 done。\n4. **【低】契约定义**：已 done，关注 10-11 评审中两处字段口径修订的下游落地即可。\n\n## 4. 接手人建议先读\n1. 需求清单 v3 —— 了解整体范围与口径。\n2. 评审纪要 10-11 —— 了解契约定义最新修订，避免后续脚本/演练遗漏。\n3. 迁移脚本 runbook —— 存储迁移与灰度开关都会涉及执行细节。\n\n## 5. 已知风险与开口项\n- **风险（分析）**：灰度开关完全依赖安全评审排期，排期时间未定，存在阻塞。\n- **风险（分析）**：回退演练的\"数据校验步骤\"具体怎么补、标准是什么，材料未给出，需新同事对齐。\n- **开口项**：存储迁移 in_progress 状态是否仍需保留（例如等待生产环境验证结论），材料未说明，建议确认。", + "think_stripped": true +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-10.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-10.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..6864c9a7 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/B/to-10.json @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +{ + "task": "to-10", + "family": "task-overview", + "arm": "B", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "progress", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 1108, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 440, + "completion_tokens": 668, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 0 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 8.4 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "markdown": "## 📦 任务进度：交付门禁自动化\n\n**整体进度：3/5 完成**\n\n| 步骤 | 状态 |\n|---|---|\n| 需求冻结 | ✅ done |\n| 契约定义 | ✅ done |\n| 存储迁移 | 🔵 in_progress |\n| 灰度开关 | ⏳ pending |\n| 回退演练 | ⏳ pending |\n\n### 🔵 当前：存储迁移\n- 迁移脚本已在预发跑通（10-08，耗时 14m）\n- 状态仍标 in_progress，分析：预发通过不等于生产落地，可能还需正式上线与结果确认\n\n### ⏳ 后续待办\n1. **存储迁移收尾** → 推进正式环境迁移并确认结果\n2. **灰度开关** → 当前阻塞于安全评审排期（10-09），需推动评审排期\n3. **回退演练** → 草案已提交（10-10），但**缺少数据校验步骤**，需补齐后进入演练\n\n### 📎 已交付产物\n- 需求清单 v3\n- 迁移脚本 runbook\n- 评审纪要 10-11（契约评审通过，含两处字段口径修订）\n\n---\n**分析建议**：当前最关键的两个动作为①推动灰度开关安全评审排期，避免后续阻塞；②补全回退演练的数据校验步骤，否则演练无法闭环。", + "ok": true, + "wall_s": 8.4, + "raw_markdown": "The user wants a quick view of where the task stands and what the next step is. I need to create a Markdown card summarizing the status.\n\nLet me analyze the materials:\n- Task: 交付门禁自动化 (Delivery Gate Automation)\n- Steps status:\n - 需求冻结: done\n - 契约定义: done\n - 存储迁移: in_progress\n - 灰度开关: pending\n - 回退演练: pending\n\nRecent dynamics:\n- 10-08: 迁移脚本在预发跑通，耗时 14m\n- 10-09: 灰度开关等待安全评审排期\n- 10-10: 回退演练草案提交，缺少数据校验步骤\n- 10-11: 契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订\n\nArtifacts:\n- 需求清单 v3\n- 迁移脚本 runbook\n- 评审纪要 10-11\n\nCurrent position: 存储迁移 is in progress (already verified in pre-release, but not yet fully done? Or is it waiting for something?)\n- The script ran successfully in pre-release, so the migration technical work seems done. But status says \"in_progress\".\n\nNext step: This needs analysis. Looking at the sequence:\n1. 存储迁移 in_progress - the script passed in pre-prod, so likely needs production rollout or final sign-off\n2. 灰度开关 pending - waiting for security review scheduling\n3. 回退演练 pending - draft submitted but missing data validation step\n\nSo the immediate next steps should be:\n1. Complete/finalize 存储迁移 (it seems to be in progress with the script validated)\n2. Schedule security review for 灰度开关 (it's blocked)\n3. Add data validation steps to 回退演练 draft\n\nLet me structure the card.\n\n## 📦 任务进度：交付门禁自动化\n\n**整体进度：3/5 完成**\n\n| 步骤 | 状态 |\n|---|---|\n| 需求冻结 | ✅ done |\n| 契约定义 | ✅ done |\n| 存储迁移 | 🔵 in_progress |\n| 灰度开关 | ⏳ pending |\n| 回退演练 | ⏳ pending |\n\n### 🔵 当前：存储迁移\n- 迁移脚本已在预发跑通（10-08，耗时 14m）\n- 状态仍标 in_progress，分析：预发通过不等于生产落地，可能还需正式上线与结果确认\n\n### ⏳ 后续待办\n1. **存储迁移收尾** → 推进正式环境迁移并确认结果\n2. **灰度开关** → 当前阻塞于安全评审排期（10-09），需推动评审排期\n3. **回退演练** → 草案已提交（10-10），但**缺少数据校验步骤**，需补齐后进入演练\n\n### 📎 已交付产物\n- 需求清单 v3\n- 迁移脚本 runbook\n- 评审纪要 10-11（契约评审通过，含两处字段口径修订）\n\n---\n**分析建议**：当前最关键的两个动作为①推动灰度开关安全评审排期，避免后续阻塞；②补全回退演练的数据校验步骤，否则演练无法闭环。", + "think_stripped": true +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-01.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-01.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..92ce6a39 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-01.json @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +{ + "task": "rc-01", + "family": "research-compare", + "arm": "G-hs", + "model": "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed", + "goalKind": "compare", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 1966, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 935, + "completion_tokens": 1031 + }, + "latency_s": 17.98 + }, + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 2734, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 987, + "completion_tokens": 1747, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 891 + } + }, + "latency_s": 26.42 + } + ], + "callCount": 2, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"供应商选型对比\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"source\":[[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1\"],[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2\"],[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3\"]],\"compare\":{\"right\":{\"tone\":\"info\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"source\":[[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1\"]],\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"报价\",\"¥15/人/天\"],[\"部署形态\",\"国密支持（私有化）\"],[\"上线时间\",\"2022-08\"],[\"近半年发布\",\"7次\"],[\"修复周期\",\"平均3天\"]]}},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"source\":[[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2\"]],\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"报价\",\"¥5/人/天\"],[\"部署形态\",\"仅SaaS\"],[\"上线时间\",\"2019-03\"],[\"近半年发布\",\"2次\"],[\"修复周期\",\"平均1天\"]]}},{\"id\":\"n1c\",\"source\":[[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3\"]],\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"报价\",\"¥12/人/天\"],[\"部署形态\",\"私有化可选\"],[\"上线时间\",\"2021-11\"],[\"近半年发布\",\"7次\"],[\"修复周期\",\"平均4天\"]]}}]},\"left\":{\"title\":\"核心能力\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"source\":[[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1\"]],\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"VaultKeep\",\"权限中枢\"],[\"RBAC\",\"支持细粒度角色控制\"],[\"临时令牌\",\"限时授权管理\"],[\"密钥轮换\",\"自动密钥更新\"]]}},{\"id\":\"n2b\",\"source\":[[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2\"]],\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"LarkPipe\",\"消息管道\"],[\"Webhook路由\",\"灵活事件分发\"],[\"重试策略\",\"可配置失败重试\"],[\"模板变量\",\"动态消息组装\"]]}},{\"id\":\"n2c\",\"source\":[[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3\"]],\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"NexusGrid\",\"数据表格\"],[\"虚拟滚动\",\"大数据量渲染优化\"],[\"单元格校验\",\"数据质量保障\"],[\"导出Excel\",\"原生支持\"]]}}]}}},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"source\":[[\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"]],\"tree\":{\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"label\":\"风险提示\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a1\",\"badge\":\"中\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"label\":\"供应商锁定\",\"count\":\"私有API占比40%\"},{\"id\":\"n3a2\",\"badge\":\"低\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"label\":\"培训成本\",\"count\":\"界面术语不一致\"},{\"id\":\"n3a3\",\"badge\":\"中\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"label\":\"升级断层\",\"count\":\"近两季度仅小版本\"}]}]}},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"markdown\":\"## 选型建议\\n\\n**推荐优先级：VaultKeep > NexusGrid > LarkPipe**\\n\\n### 理由\\n\\n1. **安全合规优先**：VaultKeep 是唯一支持国密且提供私有化部署的方案，满足数据主权要求，适合金融/政务场景。\\n2. **综合性价比**：NexusGrid 在价格与部署灵活性间取得平衡，私有化可选降低了锁定风险，7次发布频率表明积极维护。\\n3. **成本敏感可考虑 LarkPipe**：报价最低且修复速度快（1天），但仅 SaaS 形态存在数据安全与锁定风险，需评估业务场景容忍度。\\n\\n### 决策要点\\n- 若数据合规要求高 → 选 VaultKeep\\n- 若需平衡成本与灵活性 → 选 NexusGrid\\n- 若预算极度紧张且接受 SaaS → LarkPipe\"}]}", + "valid_first": false, + "errors_first": [ + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None" + ], + "stats_first": { + "nodes": 3, + "maxDepth": 1, + "types": [], + "refsUsed": [], + "unknownRefs": [] + }, + "raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"供应商选型对比报告\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"compare\":{\"left\":{\"title\":\"VaultKeep\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1\"],\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"类型\",\"权限中枢\"],[\"上线\",\"2022-08\"],[\"核心能力\",\"RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换\"],[\"报价\",\"¥15/人/天\"],[\"部署\",\"国密支持\"],[\"近半年发布\",\"7次\"],[\"修复周期\",\"3天\"]]}}]},\"right\":{\"title\":\"NexusGrid\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3\"],\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"类型\",\"数据表格\"],[\"上线\",\"2021-11\"],[\"核心能力\",\"虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出Excel\"],[\"报价\",\"¥12/人/天\"],[\"部署\",\"私有化可选\"],[\"近半年发布\",\"7次\"],[\"修复周期\",\"4天\"]]}}]}}},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"tabs\":{\"tabs\":[{\"id\":\"tab1\",\"label\":\"价格对比\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"chart-lite\":{\"chart\":{\"kind\":\"bar\",\"labels\":[\"VaultKeep\",\"LarkPipe\",\"NexusGrid\"],\"series\":[15,5,12]}}}]},{\"id\":\"tab2\",\"label\":\"综合对比\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2b\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3\"],\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"vendor\",\"label\":\"供应商\"},{\"key\":\"type\",\"label\":\"类型\"},{\"key\":\"price\",\"label\":\"日报价\"},{\"key\":\"deploy\",\"label\":\"部署\"},{\"key\":\"release\",\"label\":\"近半年发布\"},{\"key\":\"fix\",\"label\":\"修复周期\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"row1\",\"cells\":[[\"vendor\",\"VaultKeep\"],[\"type\",\"权限中枢\"],[\"price\",\"¥15\"],[\"deploy\",\"国密\"],[\"release\",\"7次\"],[\"fix\",\"3天\"]]},{\"id\":\"row2\",\"cells\":[[\"vendor\",\"LarkPipe\"],[\"type\",\"消息管道\"],[\"price\",\"¥5\"],[\"deploy\",\"仅SaaS\"],[\"release\",\"2次\"],[\"fix\",\"1天\"]]},{\"id\":\"row3\",\"cells\":[[\"vendor\",\"NexusGrid\"],[\"type\",\"数据表格\"],[\"price\",\"¥12\"],[\"deploy\",\"私有化可选\"],[\"release\",\"7次\"],[\"fix\",\"4天\"]]}]}}]}]}},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"],\"markdown\":\"## 风险评估\\n\\n| 风险项 | 等级 | 说明 |\\n|--------|------|------|\\n| 供应商锁定 | 中 | 私有API占比40% |\\n| 培训成本 | 低 | 界面术语与现有系统不一致 |\\n| 升级断层 | 中 | 近两季度仅小版本更新 |\"},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"markdown\":\"## 选型建议\\n\\n**推荐：NexusGrid**\\n\\n理由：\\n1. **部署灵活**：支持私有化部署，可规避供应商锁定风险\\n2. **价格适中**：¥12/人/天，介于两者之间\\n3. **活跃迭代**：近半年7次发布，功能持续完善\\n\\n**备选考虑**\\n- 若安全合规要求极高（如金融、政务），选 **VaultKeep**（国密支持）\\n- 若成本优先且接受SaaS限制，选 **LarkPipe**（最低价、修复最快）\"}]}", + "repaired": true, + "valid_final": false, + "errors_final": [ + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None" + ], + "spec": null, + "wall_s": 44.4 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-02.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-02.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..1d50416f --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-02.json @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +{ + "task": "rc-02", + "family": "research-compare", + "arm": "G-hs", + "model": "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed", + "goalKind": "risk", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 2254, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 936, + "completion_tokens": 1318, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 891 + } + }, + "latency_s": 18.79 + }, + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 2158, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 988, + "completion_tokens": 1170, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 891 + } + }, + "latency_s": 16.94 + } + ], + "callCount": 2, + "raw_first": "```json\n{\n \"title\": \"供应商风控评审报告\",\n \"nodes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n1\",\n \"source\": [\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"],\n \"tree\": {\n \"nodes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"risk-high\",\n \"label\": \"高风险\",\n \"tone\": \"danger\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"risk-lock\",\n \"label\": \"供应商锁定\",\n \"badge\": \"中\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"risk-lock-detail\",\n \"label\": \"私有 API 占比 40%，迁移成本高\",\n \"count\": \"40%\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"risk-medium\",\n \"label\": \"中风险\",\n \"tone\": \"warn\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"risk-upgrade\",\n \"label\": \"升级断层\",\n \"badge\": \"中\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"risk-upgrade-detail\",\n \"label\": \"近两季度仅小版本，功能迭代停滞\",\n \"count\": \"2 季度\"\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"risk-deploy\",\n \"label\": \"部署形态局限\",\n \"badge\": \"中\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"risk-deploy-detail\",\n \"label\": \"LarkPipe 仅 SaaS，数据主权受限\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"risk-low\",\n \"label\": \"低风险\",\n \"tone\": \"info\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"risk-train\",\n \"label\": \"培训成本\",\n \"badge\": \"低\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"risk-train-detail\",\n \"label\": \"界面术语与现有系统不一致，需适配\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n }\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n2\",\n \"source\": [\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\", \"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1\", \"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2\", \"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3\"],\n \"table\": {\n \"columns\": [\n {\"key\": \"risk\", \"label\": \"风险项\"},\n {\"key\": \"severity\", \"label\": \"严重度\"},\n {\"key\": \"source\", \"label\": \"来源\"},\n {\"key\": \"judgment\", \"label\": \"判断\"}\n ],\n \"rows\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"row-1\",\n \"cells\": [\n [\"risk\", \"供应商锁定（私有 API）\"],\n [\"severity\", \"中\"],\n [\"source\", \"尽调备忘\"],\n [\"judgment\", \"40% 私有 API 占比显著，建议合同中约定数据导出接口与迁移 SLA\"]\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"row-2\",\n \"cells\": [\n [\"risk\", \"升级断层\"],\n [\"severity\", \"中\"],\n [\"source\", \"尽调备忘\"],\n [\"judgment\", \"连续两季无大版本更新，需评估供应商研发投入可持续性\"]\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"row-3\",\n \"cells\": [\n [\"risk\", \"培训成本\"],\n [\"severity\", \"低\"],\n [\"source\", \"尽调备忘\"],\n [\"judgment\", \"术语不一致属常见问题，可通过内部培训文档缓解\"]\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"row-4\",\n \"cells\": [\n [\"risk\", \"SaaS 部署合规性\"],\n [\"severity\", \"中\"],\n [\"source\", \"LarkPipe 规格\"],\n [\"judgment\", \"仅 SaaS 形态可能不符合金融/政务行业数据本地化要求，建议优先选择私有化可选产品\"]\n ]\n }\n ]\n }\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n3\",\n \"markdown\": \"**风控建议**：当前三项中风险均来自内部尽调，其中供应商锁定与升级断层需在采购决策前与供应商明确协议条款；SaaS 部署合规性需结合业务所属行业法规进一步评估。\"\n }\n ]\n}\n```", + "valid_first": false, + "errors_first": [ + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None" + ], + "stats_first": { + "nodes": 3, + "maxDepth": 1, + "types": [], + "refsUsed": [], + "unknownRefs": [] + }, + "raw_repair": "```json\n{\n \"title\": \"风控评审：供应商风险分析\",\n \"nodes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n1\",\n \"source\": [\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"],\n \"section\": {\n \"title\": \"风险总览\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n1a\",\n \"tree\": {\n \"nodes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"risk1\",\n \"label\": \"供应商锁定\",\n \"tone\": \"warn\",\n \"badge\": \"中\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"risk1a\",\n \"label\": \"私有 API 占比 40%，替换成本高\"\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"risk2\",\n \"label\": \"升级断层\",\n \"tone\": \"warn\",\n \"badge\": \"中\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"risk2a\",\n \"label\": \"近两季度仅小版本，功能停滞风险\"\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"risk3\",\n \"label\": \"培训成本\",\n \"tone\": \"info\",\n \"badge\": \"低\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"risk3a\",\n \"label\": \"界面术语与现有系统不一致\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n }\n }\n ]\n }\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n2\",\n \"source\": [\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"],\n \"section\": {\n \"title\": \"风险详析\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n2a\",\n \"tabs\": {\n \"tabs\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"tab1\",\n \"label\": \"供应商锁定（中）\",\n \"nodes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n2a1\",\n \"markdown\": \"**来源**：`doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo`\\n\\n**现状**：私有 API 占比达 40%，对接深度绑定。\\n\\n**影响**：若供应商涨价或服务中断，迁移成本高、周期长。\\n\\n**建议**：\\n1. 要求提供 API 兼容层或标准化接口\\n2. 评估多供应商备份方案的可行性\\n3. 合同中明确数据迁移条款\"\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"tab2\",\n \"label\": \"升级断层（中）\",\n \"nodes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n2a2\",\n \"markdown\": \"**来源**：`doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo`\\n\\n**现状**：近两季度仅发布小版本，未见大版本迭代。\\n\\n**影响**：功能更新停滞，安全补丁可能延迟，长期看技术债务累积。\\n\\n**建议**：\\n1. 与供应商确认产品 roadmap\\n2. 评估竞品更新频率作为参考\\n3. 监控供应商财务健康度\"\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"tab3\",\n \"label\": \"培训成本（低）\",\n \"nodes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n2a3\",\n \"markdown\": \"**来源**：`doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo`\\n\\n**现状**：界面术语与现有系统不一致，新用户上手需要额外培训。\\n\\n**影响**：短期增加培训成本，长期可通过统一术语库缓解。\\n\\n**建议**：\\n1. 制作内部术语对照表\\n2. 上线前安排厂商培训\\n3. 预留 1-2 周适应期\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n }\n }\n ]\n }\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n3\",\n \"section\": {\n \"title\": \"综合判断\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n3a\",\n \"progress\": {\n \"label\": \"整体风险等级\",\n \"value\": 0.55\n }\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n3b\",\n \"markdown\": \"**结论**：本轮采购综合风险为**中等**。\\n\\n- 供应商锁定与升级断层两项中等风险需重点关注，建议在合同中增加 SLA 保障条款\\n- 培训成本为低风险，可通过内部培训消化\\n- 鉴于近半年发布频率尚可（7次），供应商技术投入未见明显停滞迹象，风险可控但需持续监控\"\n }\n ]\n }\n }\n ]\n}\n```", + "repaired": true, + "valid_final": false, + "errors_final": [ + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None" + ], + "spec": null, + "wall_s": 35.7 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-03.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-03.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..83c593a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-03.json @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +{ + "task": "rc-03", + "family": "research-compare", + "arm": "G-hs", + "model": "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed", + "goalKind": "order", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 2106, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 926, + "completion_tokens": 1180, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 891 + } + }, + "latency_s": 23.08 + }, + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 2621, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 978, + "completion_tokens": 1643, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 891 + } + }, + "latency_s": 27.23 + } + ], + "callCount": 2, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"实施路线图：分阶段部署计划\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3\",\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"],\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"第一阶段：基础设施层\",\"time\":\"Week 1-2\",\"markdown\":\"### 目标\\n部署消息管道作为统一集成中枢\\n\\n### 选型依据\\n- 报价最低（¥5/人/天），试错成本可控【doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2】\\n- 修复周期仅 1 天，运维压力最小【doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2】\\n- 2019 年上线，生产稳定性已验证【doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2】\\n\\n### 依赖\\n- 无前置依赖，可最先实施\\n\\n### 里程碑\\n✅ Webhook 路由联调完成\\n✅ 重试策略配置验收\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"title\":\"第二阶段：核心数据平台\",\"time\":\"Week 3-5\",\"markdown\":\"### 目标\\n上线数据表格能力，支撑业务数据化运营\\n\\n### 选型依据\\n- 虚拟滚动保障大数据量性能【doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3】\\n- 支持私有化部署，兼顾合规需求【doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3】\\n- 培训成本风险低（界面术语不一致）【doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo】\\n\\n### 依赖\\n- 第一阶段（LarkPipe）完成\\n\\n### 里程碑\\n✅ 单元格校验规则落地\\n✅ Excel 导出流程打通\",\"tone\":\"info\"},{\"title\":\"第三阶段：安全权限体系\",\"time\":\"Week 6-8\",\"markdown\":\"### 目标\\n构建统一权限中枢，治理供应商锁定风险\\n\\n### 选型依据\\n- RBAC 能力覆盖权限管理全场景【doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1】\\n- 支持国密，满足合规要求【doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1】\\n- 临时令牌机制降低长期密钥暴露风险【doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1】\\n\\n### 依赖\\n- 第一阶段（集成中枢就绪）\\n- 第二阶段（数据平台就绪）\\n\\n### 里程碑\\n✅ RBAC 角色体系上线\\n✅ 密钥轮换机制启用\\n\\n⚠️ 注意：供应商锁定风险中等（私有 API 占 40%），需同步制定 API 抽象层【doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo】\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"第四阶段：集成优化\",\"time\":\"Week 9-10\",\"markdown\":\"### 目标\\n跨系统联动，稳定发布流程\\n\\n### 选型依据\\n- 三套工具均已完成联调\\n- 近半年平均发布 7 次，工具链成熟度足够【doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1】【doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3】\\n\\n### 依赖\\n- 前三阶段全部完成\\n\\n### 里程碑\\n✅ 端到端流程串测\\n✅ 监控告警配置验收\\n\\n⚠️ 升级断层风险：近两季度仅小版本更新，需建立版本追踪机制【doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo】\"}]}},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"],\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"供应商锁定\",\"中\",\"需同步构建 API 抽象隔离层\"],[\"培训成本\",\"低\",\"提前准备术语对照文档\"],[\"升级断层\",\"中\",\"建立版本健康度监控\"]]}},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"markdown\":\"**总体成本估算（10人团队，10周）**\\n\\n| 供应商 | 单价 | 估算成本 |\\n|--------|------|----------|\\n| LarkPipe | ¥5/人/天 | ~¥3,500 |\\n| NexusGrid | ¥12/人/天 | ~¥8,400 |\\n| VaultKeep | ¥15/人/天 | ~¥10,500 |\\n| **合计** | - | **~¥22,400** |\\n\\n*注：实际成本受实际人天影响，建议按需调整*\"}]}", + "valid_first": false, + "errors_first": [ + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None" + ], + "stats_first": { + "nodes": 3, + "maxDepth": 1, + "types": [], + "refsUsed": [], + "unknownRefs": [] + }, + "raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"供应商评估与实施规划\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"风险评估\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"],\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"供应商锁定\",\"中（私有 API 占比 40%）\"],[\"升级断层\",\"中（近两季度仅小版本）\"],[\"培训成本\",\"低（界面术语不一致）\"]]},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"],\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**缓解建议**：优先引入私有化可选方案，降低锁定风险；提前开展界面适配培训。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"供应商概览\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"compare\",\"compare\":{\"left\":{\"title\":\"VaultKeep（权限中枢）\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2a1\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1\"],\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"上线时间\",\"2022-08\"],[\"核心能力\",\"RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换\"],[\"报价\",\"¥15/人/天\"],[\"部署\",\"国密支持\"],[\"维护\",\"7次发布/修复周期3天\"]]}]},{\"right\":{\"title\":\"LarkPipe（消息管道）\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2b1\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2\"],\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"上线时间\",\"2019-03\"],[\"核心能力\",\"Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量\"],[\"报价\",\"¥5/人/天\"],[\"部署\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"维护\",\"2次发布/修复周期1天\"]]}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n2c\",\"type\":\"compare\",\"compare\":{\"left\":{\"title\":\"NexusGrid（数据表格）\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2c1\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3\"],\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"上线时间\",\"2021-11\"],[\"核心能力\",\"虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel\"],[\"报价\",\"¥12/人/天\"],[\"部署\",\"私有化可选\"],[\"维护\",\"7次发布/修复周期4天\"]]}]}}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"分阶段实施计划\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"],\"type\":\"steps\",\"steps\":{\"current\":0,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"阶段一：引入 NexusGrid（数据表格）\",\"status\":\"active\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"label\":\"阶段二：引入 LarkPipe（消息管道）\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"阶段三：引入 VaultKeep（权限中枢）\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"info\"},{\"label\":\"阶段四：集成联调与验收\",\"status\":\"pending\"}]}},{\"id\":\"n3b\",\"type\":\"tabs\",\"tabs\":{\"tabs\":[{\"id\":\"t1\",\"label\":\"阶段一详情\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"t1a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**目标**：建立数据展示与导出基础能力\\n\\n**前置条件**：评审通过\\n\\n**步骤**：1. 确认私有化部署需求；2. 完成数据源对接；3. 配置单元格校验规则；4. 上线 Excel 导出功能\\n\\n**里程碑**：上线后 2 周内完成数据迁移\\n\\n**风险**：升级断层（中），建议锁定大版本升级窗口\\n\\n**来源**：doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3、doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"}]},{\"id\":\"t2\",\"label\":\"阶段二详情\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"t2a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**目标**：建立标准化消息通道\\n\\n**前置条件**：阶段一完成\\n\\n**步骤**：1. 梳理 Webhook 路由规则；2. 配置重试策略；3. 定义模板变量规范；4. 灰度切换 20% 流量\\n\\n**里程碑**：灰度覆盖率 100%\\n\\n**风险**：SaaS 依赖，需评估数据合规要求\\n\\n**来源**：doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2\"}]},{\"id\":\"t3\",\"label\":\"阶段三详情\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"t3a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**目标**：建立统一权限管控\\n\\n**前置条件**：阶段二完成\\n\\n**步骤**：1. 规划 RBAC 角色体系；2. 接入国密认证；3. 配置密钥轮换策略；4. 部署临时令牌机制\\n\\n**里程碑**：全量切换权限控制\\n\\n**风险**：私有 API 锁定（中），建议同步建设 API 网关抽象层\\n\\n**来源**：doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1、doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"}]},{\"id\":\"t4\",\"label\":\"阶段四详情\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"t4a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**目标**：端到端集成验证\\n\\n**前置条件**：前三阶段完成\\n\\n**步骤**：1. 数据权限联动测试；2. 消息链路监控验证；3. 性能压测；4. 用户验收测试（UAT）\\n\\n**里程碑**：正式投产\"}]}}]}]}]}", + "repaired": true, + "valid_final": false, + "errors_final": [ + "JSON 解析失败: Expecting property name enclosed in double quotes: line 1 column 674 (char 673)" + ], + "spec": null, + "wall_s": 50.3 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-07.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-07.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e1f60f5c --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-07.json @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +{ + "task": "rc-07", + "family": "research-compare", + "arm": "G-hs", + "model": "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed", + "goalKind": "compare", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 1969, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 935, + "completion_tokens": 1034, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 443 + } + }, + "latency_s": 17.78 + }, + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 2106, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 984, + "completion_tokens": 1122, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 891 + } + }, + "latency_s": 18.18 + } + ], + "callCount": 2, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"供应商选型对比报告\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"],\"compare\":{\"left\":{\"title\":\"供应商横向对比\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"],\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"vendor\",\"label\":\"供应商\"},{\"key\":\"category\",\"label\":\"产品类别\"},{\"key\":\"price\",\"label\":\"报价\"},{\"key\":\"deployment\",\"label\":\"部署形态\"},{\"key\":\"releases\",\"label\":\"近半年发布\"},{\"key\":\"fixcycle\",\"label\":\"平均修复周期\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"r1\",\"cells\":[[\"vendor\",\"LarkPipe\"],[\"category\",\"消息管道\"],[\"price\",\"¥5/人/天\"],[\"deployment\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"releases\",\"7 次\"],[\"fixcycle\",\"2 天\"]]},{\"id\":\"r2\",\"cells\":[[\"vendor\",\"VaultKeep\"],[\"category\",\"权限中枢\"],[\"price\",\"¥15/人/天\"],[\"deployment\",\"国密支持\"],[\"releases\",\"4 次\"],[\"fixcycle\",\"4 天\"]]},{\"id\":\"r3\",\"cells\":[[\"vendor\",\"EchoDocs\"],[\"category\",\"文档协同\"],[\"price\",\"¥9/人/天\"],[\"deployment\",\"无离线\"],[\"releases\",\"2 次\"],[\"fixcycle\",\"1 天\"]]}]}}]}},\"right\":{\"title\":\"选型建议\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"markdown\":\"## 建议结论\\n\\n**综合推荐：EchoDocs**\\n\\n### 核心理由\\n\\n| 维度 | 分析 |\\n|------|------|\\n| **价格** | EchoDocs（¥9）介于两者之间，LarkPipe 最便宜但功能单一 |\\n| **稳定性** | EchoDocs 修复周期仅 1 天，响应最快 |\\n| **风险可控** | 文档协同非核心系统，锁定风险（40%）影响有限 |\\n\\n### 备选方案\\n\\n- **预算优先**：选 LarkPipe，但需接受功能局限性\\n- **安全合规优先**：选 VaultKeep，适合权限管理为核心的场景\\n\\n### 待确认事项\\n\\n- ⚠️ 性能未验证（高风险）：建议在选型前要求供应商提供万行表格压测报告\\n- ⚠️ 培训成本（低风险）：提前对比界面术语差异\\n\\n> 以上建议基于现有尽调材料，最终决策请结合业务实际需求。\"}]}}}},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"风险等级-高\", \"性能未验证（万行表格场景无官方基准）\"],[\"风险等级-中\", \"供应商锁定（私有 API 占比 40%）\"],[\"风险等级-低\", \"培训成本（界面术语与现有系统不一致）\"]]}}]}", + "valid_first": false, + "errors_first": [ + "JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 1404 (char 1403)" + ], + "stats_first": null, + "raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"供应商选型对比报告\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"],\"node\":{\"compare\":{\"left\":{\"title\":\"LarkPipe\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"node\":{\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"上线时间\",\"2019-03\"],[\"报价\",\"¥5/人/天\"],[\"部署形态\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"平均修复周期\",\"2 天\"]]}}},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"node\":{\"markdown\":{\"markdown\":\"**核心能力**：Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量\\n**近半年发布**：7 次\"}}]}},\"right\":{\"title\":\"VaultKeep\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"node\":{\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"上线时间\",\"2022-08\"],[\"报价\",\"¥15/人/天\"],[\"部署形态\",\"国密支持\"],[\"平均修复周期\",\"4 天\"]]}}},{\"id\":\"n2b\",\"node\":{\"markdown\":{\"markdown\":\"**核心能力**：RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换\\n**近半年发布**：4 次\"}}]}}}},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"node\":{\"section\":{\"title\":\"文档协同类工具\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"node\":{\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"上线时间\",\"2020-06\"],[\"报价\",\"¥9/人/天\"],[\"部署形态\",\"无离线\"],[\"平均修复周期\",\"1 天\"]]}}},{\"id\":\"n3b\",\"node\":{\"markdown\":{\"markdown\":\"**核心能力**：批注、版本链、全文检索\\n**近半年发布**：2 次\\n**供应商**：EchoDocs\"}}]}}]}},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"node\":{\"section\":{\"title\":\"风险备忘\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"node\":{\"tree\":{\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"r1\",\"label\":\"性能未验证\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"badge\":\"高\"},{\"id\":\"r2\",\"label\":\"培训成本\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"badge\":\"低\"},{\"id\":\"r3\",\"label\":\"供应商锁定\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"badge\":\"中\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"r3a\",\"label\":\"私有 API 占比 40%\"}]}]}}},{\"id\":\"n4b\",\"node\":{\"markdown\":{\"markdown\":\"> 注：万行表格场景无官方基准；界面术语与现有系统不一致\"}}]}}}},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"node\":{\"tabs\":{\"tabs\":[{\"id\":\"tab1\",\"label\":\"综合建议\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n5a\",\"node\":{\"markdown\":{\"markdown\":\"## 选型建议\\n\\n### 🥇 首选推荐：EchoDocs\\n\\n**理由**：\\n1. **稳定可靠**：平均修复周期仅 1 天，近半年 0 重大事故\\n2. **功能完整**：批注+版本链+全文检索覆盖核心文档协同需求\\n3. **性价比优**：¥9/人/天，处于三家中游\\n\\n### 🥈 备选方案：LarkPipe\\n\\n**适用场景**：若需与 Lark 生态深度集成\\n- 优势：发布频率高（7次/半年）、修复快\\n- 劣势：仅 SaaS 部署，供应商锁定风险较高\\n\\n### ⚠️ 暂不推荐：VaultKeep\\n\\n**原因**：\\n- 价格最高（¥15/人/天）\\n- 修复周期较长（4天）\\n- 若非强合规需求，可延后评估\\n\\n---\\n\\n### 行动建议\\n1. 对 EchoDocs 进行 POC 验证（重点：万行表格性能）\\n2. 确认私有 API 锁定解决方案\\n3. 安排 EchoDocs 与 VaultKeep 演示\"}}]},{\"id\":\"tab2\",\"label\":\"决策投票\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n5b\",\"node\":{\"progress\":{\"label\":\"EchoDocs 推荐度\",\"value\":0.75}},{\"id\":\"n5c\",\"node\":{\"progress\":{\"label\":\"LarkPipe 推荐度\",\"value\":0.5}},{\"id\":\"n5d\",\"node\":{\"progress\":{\"label\":\"VaultKeep 推荐度\",\"value\":0.3}}}]}]}}}},{\"id\":\"n6\",\"node\":{\"actions\":{\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"a1\",\"label\":\"通过 EchoDocs 进入 POC\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"a2\",\"label\":\"要求三家伙伴同台演示\",\"style\":\"default\"},{\"id\":\"a3\",\"label\":\"暂缓决策\",\"style\":\"danger\"}]}}}]}", + "repaired": true, + "valid_final": false, + "errors_final": [ + "JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 394 (char 393)" + ], + "spec": null, + "wall_s": 36.0 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-08.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-08.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e0b8e07f --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-08.json @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +{ + "task": "rc-08", + "family": "research-compare", + "arm": "G-hs", + "model": "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed", + "goalKind": "risk", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 1951, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 936, + "completion_tokens": 1015, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 891 + } + }, + "latency_s": 15.92 + }, + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 1998, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 985, + "completion_tokens": 1013, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 891 + } + }, + "latency_s": 15.63 + } + ], + "callCount": 2, + "raw_first": "```json\n{\"title\":\"风控评审：供应商风险分析\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"node\":{\"section\":{\"title\":\"⚠️ 高风险\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"node\":{\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"风险项\",\"性能未验证\"],[\"严重度\",\"高\"],[\"具体描述\",\"万行表格场景无官方基准\"],[\"来源\",\"尽调风险备忘\"]]}}},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"node\":{\"markdown\":\"**分析判断**：高并发或大文档场景下缺乏性能基线数据，可能导致采购后出现瓶颈。建议要求供应商提供 P95/P99 响应时延报告，或约定 SLA 兜底条款。\"}}]}}},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"node\":{\"section\":{\"title\":\"⚡ 中风险\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"node\":{\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"风险项\",\"供应商锁定\"],[\"严重度\",\"中\"],[\"具体描述\",\"私有 API 占比 40%\"],[\"来源\",\"尽调风险备忘\"]]}}},{\"id\":\"n2b\",\"node\":{\"markdown\":\"**分析判断**：私有 API 占比偏高意味着迁移成本较大。建议在合同中明确数据导出格式、接口文档所有权，并约定退出时的技术交接流程。\"}}]}}},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"node\":{\"section\":{\"title\":\"🔔 低风险\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"node\":{\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"风险项\",\"培训成本\"],[\"严重度\",\"低\"],[\"具体描述\",\"界面术语与现有系统不一致\"],[\"来源\",\"尽调风险备忘\"]]}}},{\"id\":\"n3b\",\"node\":{\"markdown\":\"**分析判断**：术语差异属于可管理的适配问题。建议通过内部培训或定制 UI 标签即可缓解，对采购决策影响有限。\"}}]}}},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"node\":{\"section\":{\"title\":\"供应商横向对比\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"],\"node\":{\"compare\":{\"left\":{\"title\":\"LarkPipe\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"nodes\":[{\"node\":{\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"上线时间\",\"2019-03\"],[\"报价\",\"¥5/人/天\"],[\"部署\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"近半年发布\",\"7 次\"],[\"修复周期\",\"2 天\"]]}}]},\"right\":{\"title\":\"VaultKeep\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"nodes\":[{\"node\":{\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"上线时间\",\"2022-08\"],[\"报价\",\"¥15/人/天\"],[\"部署\",\"国密支持\"],[\"近半年发布\",\"4 次\"],[\"修复周期\",\"4 天\"]]}}]}}},{\"node\":{\"compare\":{\"left\":{\"title\":\"EchoDocs\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"nodes\":[{\"node\":{\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"上线时间\",\"2020-06\"],[\"报价\",\"¥9/人/天\"],[\"部署\",\"无离线\"],[\"近半年发布\",\"2 次\"],[\"修复周期\",\"1 天\"]]}}]}},\"right\":{\"title\":\"综合建议\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"nodes\":[{\"node\":{\"markdown\":\"- **安全敏感**：选 VaultKeep（国密+RBAC）\\n- **轻量集成**：选 LarkPipe（低价+高频迭代）\\n- **文档协作**：选 EchoDocs（修复最快）\\n- **共同前提**：需先解决性能验证问题\"}}]}}}}]}}]}\n```", + "valid_first": false, + "errors_first": [ + "JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 1395 (char 1394)" + ], + "stats_first": null, + "raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"供应商风险分析报告\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"s1\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"title\":\"高风险\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"风险项\",\"性能未验证\"],[\"严重度\",\"高\"],[\"说明\",\"万行表格场景无官方基准，实际使用时可能出现卡顿或超时问题\"],[\"建议\",\"要求供应商提供性能测试报告，或在 POC 阶段重点验证大数据量场景\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"s2\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"title\":\"中风险\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"风险项\",\"供应商锁定\"],[\"严重度\",\"中\"],[\"说明\",\"私有 API 占比 40%，迁移成本高\"],[\"建议\",\"合同中明确数据导出条款，评估二供替代方案可行性\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"s3\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"title\":\"低风险\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"风险项\",\"培训成本\"],[\"严重度\",\"低\"],[\"说明\",\"界面术语与现有系统不一致，用户初期需要适应\"],[\"建议\",\"上线前安排专项培训，准备术语对照表降低学习曲线\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"s4\",\"title\":\"供应商对比\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"t1\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"],\"type\":\"table\",\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"name\",\"label\":\"供应商\"},{\"key\":\"type\",\"label\":\"类型\"},{\"key\":\"price\",\"label\":\"报价(¥/人/天)\"},{\"key\":\"deploy\",\"label\":\"部署形态\"},{\"key\":\"release\",\"label\":\"近半年发布次数\"},{\"key\":\"fix\",\"label\":\"平均修复周期\"},{\"key\":\"strength\",\"label\":\"核心优势\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"v1\",\"cells\":[[\"name\",\"LarkPipe\"],[\"type\",\"消息管道\"],[\"price\",\"5\"],[\"deploy\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"release\",\"7 次\"],[\"fix\",\"2 天\"],[\"strength\",\"Webhook 路由、重试策略\"]]},{\"id\":\"v2\",\"cells\":[[\"name\",\"VaultKeep\"],[\"type\",\"权限中枢\"],[\"price\",\"15\"],[\"deploy\",\"国密支持\"],[\"release\",\"4 次\"],[\"fix\",\"4 天\"],[\"strength\",\"RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换\"]]},{\"id\":\"v3\",\"cells\":[[\"name\",\"EchoDocs\"],[\"type\",\"文档协同\"],[\"price\",\"9\"],[\"deploy\",\"无离线\"],[\"release\",\"2 次\"],[\"fix\",\"1 天\"],[\"strength\",\"批注、版本链、全文检索\"]]}]}}]},{\"id\":\"s5\",\"title\":\"综合判断\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"m1\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**风险汇总结论：**\\n\\n三个供应商各有优劣：\\n\\n- **LarkPipe** 价格最低、响应最快，但仅有 SaaS 形态且性能未验证，建议在确认大表场景可行后再推进。\\n- **VaultKeep** 安全能力最强（国密支持），适合高安全要求场景，但单价最高且修复周期偏长，需评估预算。\\n- **EchoDocs** 文档能力突出，稳定性好（修复周期最短），但无离线能力，如需断网使用需额外规划。\\n\\n建议根据业务场景优先级选择：安全优先→ VaultKeep；成本优先且 POC 通过→ LarkPipe；文档协同核心需求→ EchoDocs。\"}]}]}", + "repaired": true, + "valid_final": false, + "errors_final": [ + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None" + ], + "spec": null, + "wall_s": 31.5 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-09.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-09.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..ac604fb3 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/rc-09.json @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +{ + "task": "rc-09", + "family": "research-compare", + "arm": "G-hs", + "model": "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed", + "goalKind": "order", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 2182, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 926, + "completion_tokens": 1256, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 891 + } + }, + "latency_s": 18.57 + }, + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 2246, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 975, + "completion_tokens": 1271, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 891 + } + }, + "latency_s": 21.91 + } + ], + "callCount": 2, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"实施规划\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"tabs1\",\"type\":\"tabs\",\"tabs\":{\"tabs\":[{\"id\":\"roadmap\",\"label\":\"实施路线图\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"steps1\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"steps\":{\"current\":0,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"第一阶段：EchoDocs 文档协同\",\"status\":\"active\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"]},{\"label\":\"第二阶段：LarkPipe 消息管道\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\"]},{\"label\":\"第三阶段：VaultKeep 权限中枢\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\"]}]}},{\"id\":\"sec1\",\"title\":\"分阶段说明\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**第一阶段（EchoDocs）**\\n- 上线时间：最早\\n- 原因：平均修复周期最短（1天），培训成本低（源：doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3、doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo）\\n- 里程碑：文档协同上线完成\\n\\n**第二阶段（LarkPipe）**\\n- 前置依赖：第一阶段完成\\n- 原因：发布频率最高（7次/半年），修复快速（2天），¥5/人/天性价比较好（源：doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1）\\n- 里程碑：Webhook 路由与重试策略上线\\n\\n**第三阶段（VaultKeep）**\\n- 前置依赖：前两阶段完成\\n- 原因：¥15/人/天成本最高，RBAC 与密钥轮换涉及核心安全，需后置验证（源：doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2）\\n- 里程碑：权限中枢全量切换\"}]}]},{\"id\":\"risk\",\"label\":\"风险提示\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"kv1\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"性能未验证（高）\",\"万行表格场景无官方基准\",\"source: doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],[\"供应商锁定（中）\",\"私有 API 占比 40%\",\"source: doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],[\"培训成本（低）\",\"界面术语与现有系统不一致\",\"source: doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"]]}]}]}]}}", + "valid_first": false, + "errors_first": [ + "JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 1148 (char 1147)" + ], + "stats_first": null, + "raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"供应商工具实施规划评审\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"nodeType\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**背景摘要**：本次规划覆盖 3 款工具，LarkPipe（消息管道）、VaultKeep（权限中枢）、EchoDocs（文档协同），需制定分阶段实施顺序与里程碑。\\n\\n**整体策略**：优先低风险/高频协同工具，再引入权限基础设施，最后扩展消息管道能力。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"],\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"nodeType\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"LarkPipe\",\"¥5/人/天 · SaaS · 2019-03 上线 · 修复周期 2 天 · 风险：供应商锁定 40%\"],[\"VaultKeep\",\"¥15/人/天 · 国密支持 · 2022-08 上线 · 修复周期 4 天 · 风险：培训成本（术语不一致）\"],[\"EchoDocs\",\"¥9/人/天 · 无离线 · 2020-06 上线 · 修复周期 1 天 · 风险：性能未验证（万行表格）\"],[\"锁定风险\",\"中：私有 API 占 40%（LarkPipe）\"],[\"培训成本\",\"低：术语与现有系统不一致（VaultKeep）\"],[\"性能风险\",\"高：万行表格无官方基准（EchoDocs）\"]]},{\"id\":\"n2b\",\"nodeType\":\"compare\",\"compare\":{\"left\":{\"title\":\"LarkPipe\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2b1\",\"nodeType\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"上线时间\",\"2019-03（成熟）\"],[\"日均成本\",\"¥5/人/天\"],[\"部署\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"修复周期\",\"2 天（快）\"],[\"风险\",\"供应商锁定 40%\"]]},{\"id\":\"n2b2\",\"nodeType\":\"progress\",\"progress\":{\"label\":\"供应商锁定风险\",\"value\":0.4}}]},\"right\":{\"title\":\"EchoDocs\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2b3\",\"nodeType\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"上线时间\",\"2020-06（成熟）\"],[\"日均成本\",\"¥9/人/天\"],[\"部署\",\"无离线\"],[\"修复周期\",\"1 天（最快）\"],[\"风险\",\"性能未验证（高）万行场景\"]]},{\"id\":\"n2b4\",\"nodeType\":\"progress\",\"progress\":{\"label\":\"性能风险\",\"value\":0.7}}]}}}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"],\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"nodeType\":\"timeline\",\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"阶段一：EchoDocs（文档协同）\",\"time\":\"优先引入\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"markdown\":\"- **核心价值**：批注 + 版本链 + 全文检索，直接提升协作效率\\n- **里程碑**：全团队上线批注与版本管理\\n- **风险对冲**：性能未验证（高），建议先以 <500 行文档试点，再扩展\",\".ref\":\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"},{\"title\":\"阶段二：VaultKeep（权限中枢）\",\"time\":\"第二阶段\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"markdown\":\"- **核心价值**：RBAC + 临时令牌 + 国密支持，补全安全基础设施\\n- **里程碑**：与现有 SSO 对接，完成角色权限配置\\n- **依赖**：阶段一完成后方可与 EchoDocs 打通权限\",\".ref\":\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\"},{\"title\":\"阶段三：LarkPipe（消息管道）\",\"time\":\"第三阶段\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"markdown\":\"- **核心价值**：Webhook 路由 + 重试策略 + 模板变量\\n- **里程碑**：实现 EchoDocs → VaultKeep 事件联动\\n- **风险**：私有 API 占 40%，需提前锁定接口规范\",\".ref\":\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"nodeType\":\"tabs\",\"tabs\":[{\"id\":\"t1\",\"label\":\"风险缓解措施\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n4a1\",\"nodeType\":\"list\",\"items\":[\"**性能未验证（高）**：万行表格场景无官方基准 → 阶段一先小范围试点 500 行文档，验收通过再全量\"]},{\"id\":\"n4a2\",\"nodeType\":\"list\",\"items\":[\"**培训成本（低）**：术语不一致 → 制定迁移手册，优先培训关键用户\"]},{\"id\":\"n4a3\",\"nodeType\":\"list\",\"items\":[\"**供应商锁定（中）**：私有 API 40% → 阶段三前与 LarkPipe 确认接口稳定性，签 SLA\"]}]}]}]}]}", + "repaired": true, + "valid_final": false, + "errors_final": [ + "JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 1318 (char 1317)" + ], + "spec": null, + "wall_s": 40.5 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/ri-01.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/ri-01.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..9b5c1b6a --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/ri-01.json @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +{ + "task": "ri-01", + "family": "requirement-input", + "arm": "G-hs", + "model": "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed", + "goalKind": "collect", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 1358, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 815, + "completion_tokens": 543, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 443 + } + }, + "latency_s": 9.01 + }, + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 2097, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 874, + "completion_tokens": 1223, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 443 + } + }, + "latency_s": 21.7 + } + ], + "callCount": 2, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"待决问题收集\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"待决问题清单\",\"type\":\"form\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-00/open\"],\"form\":{\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"onsite\",\"label\":\"供应商是否要求驻场实施？\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"是\",\"否\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"影响实施成本与排期\"},{\"key\":\"concurrency\",\"label\":\"并发审批上限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"50\",\"200\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"影响系统容量规划\"},{\"key\":\"cross_quarter\",\"label\":\"旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度？\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"允许\",\"不允许\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"若不允许则Q1上线压力较大\"},{\"key\":\"approval_sign\",\"label\":\"验收标准由谁签署？\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"财务\",\"行政\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"明确验收责任归属\"}]}}]}", + "valid_first": false, + "errors_first": [ + "$: 类型 form 不允许字段 ['form']", + "$: 非法 id '待决问题清单'", + "$: form.fields 必须为非空数组" + ], + "stats_first": { + "nodes": 1, + "maxDepth": 1, + "types": [ + "form" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "req:eval/ri-00/open" + ], + "unknownRefs": [] + }, + "raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"待决问题收集\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-00/open\"],\"type\":\"form\",\"form\":{\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"vendor_onsite\",\"label\":\"供应商是否要求驻场实施？\",\"type\":\"boolean\",\"required\":true,\"help\":\"影响实施成本与排期\"},{\"key\":\"concurrency_limit\",\"label\":\"并发审批上限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"50\",\"200\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"影响系统容量规划与预算\"},{\"key\":\"shutdown_window\",\"label\":\"旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度？\",\"type\":\"boolean\",\"required\":true,\"help\":\"若不允许，Q1 上线压力较大\"},{\"key\":\"acceptance_signer\",\"label\":\"验收标准由谁签署\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"财务\",\"行政\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"明确最终审批权责\"}]}},{\"id\":\"a1\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"submit\",\"label\":\"提交\",\"style\":\"primary\"}]}]}", + "repaired": true, + "valid_final": false, + "errors_final": [ + "$: 类型 form 不允许字段 ['form']", + "$: form.fields 必须为非空数组" + ], + "spec": null, + "wall_s": 30.7 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/ri-02.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/ri-02.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..2e2eab5c --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/ri-02.json @@ -0,0 +1,177 @@ +{ + "task": "ri-02", + "family": "requirement-input", + "arm": "G-hs", + "model": "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed", + "goalKind": "confirm", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 1503, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 812, + "completion_tokens": 691, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 443 + } + }, + "latency_s": 10.06 + }, + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 1928, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 864, + "completion_tokens": 1064, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 443 + } + }, + "latency_s": 15.16 + } + ], + "callCount": 2, + "raw_first": "```json\n{\n \"title\": \"审批系统合并项目范围确认\",\n \"nodes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n1\",\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"],\n \"section\": {\n \"title\": \"项目背景\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n1a\",\n \"kv\": {\n \"kv\": [\n [\"核心目标\", \"内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套\"],\n [\"预算上限\", \"40 万元\"],\n [\"上线时间\", \"Q1\"],\n [\"干系人\", \"财务（审批人）、行政（发起人）、IT（运维）、法务（事后复核）\"]\n ]\n }\n }\n ]\n }\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n2\",\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"],\n \"compare\": {\n \"left\": {\n \"title\": \"✅ 已定约束\",\n \"tone\": \"ok\",\n \"nodes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n2a\",\n \"kv\": {\n \"kv\": [\n [\"移动端入口\", \"保留\"],\n [\"审批链层级\", \"最多 5 级\"],\n [\"历史数据\", \"只读归档\"]\n ]\n }\n }\n ]\n },\n \"right\": {\n \"title\": \"❓ 待决事项\",\n \"tone\": \"warn\",\n \"nodes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n2b\",\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-01/open\"],\n \"list\": {\n \"items\": [\n \"旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度？\",\n \"并发审批上限：50 还是 200？\",\n \"归档年限：3 年还是 5 年？\",\n \"供应商是否要求驻场实施？\"\n ]\n }\n }\n ]\n }\n }\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n3\",\n \"markdown\": \"**请逐项确认后推进实施计划。**\"\n }\n ]\n}\n```", + "valid_first": false, + "errors_first": [ + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None" + ], + "stats_first": { + "nodes": 3, + "maxDepth": 1, + "types": [], + "refsUsed": [], + "unknownRefs": [] + }, + "raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"审批系统合并项目 - 范围确认页\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"s1\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"],\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"已定约束\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"kv1\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"],\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"项目背景\",\"内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套\"],[\"预算上限\",\"40 万元\"],[\"上线时间\",\"Q1 上线\"],[\"移动端入口\",\"保留\"],[\"审批链层级\",\"最多 5 级\"],[\"历史数据处理\",\"只读归档（不可编辑）\"]]},{\"id\":\"kv2\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"],\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"财务\",\"审批人\"],[\"行政\",\"发起人\"],[\"IT\",\"运维\"],[\"法务\",\"事后复核合同\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"s2\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-01/open\"],\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"待决事项（请逐项确认）\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"list1\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-01/open\"],\"type\":\"list\",\"items\":[\"旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度？\",\"并发审批上限：50 还是 200？\",\"归档年限：3 年还是 5 年？\",\"供应商是否要求驻场实施？\"]},{\"id\":\"act1\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"confirm\",\"label\":\"确认范围\",\"style\":\"primary\"}]}]}]}", + "repaired": true, + "valid_final": true, + "errors_final": [], + "spec": { + "title": "审批系统合并项目 - 范围确认页", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "s1", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-01/context" + ], + "type": "section", + "title": "已定约束", + "children": [ + { + "id": "kv1", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-01/context" + ], + "type": "kv", + "kv": [ + [ + "项目背景", + "内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套" + ], + [ + "预算上限", + "40 万元" + ], + [ + "上线时间", + "Q1 上线" + ], + [ + "移动端入口", + "保留" + ], + [ + "审批链层级", + "最多 5 级" + ], + [ + "历史数据处理", + "只读归档（不可编辑）" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "kv2", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-01/context" + ], + "type": "kv", + "kv": [ + [ + "财务", + "审批人" + ], + [ + "行政", + "发起人" + ], + [ + "IT", + "运维" + ], + [ + "法务", + "事后复核合同" + ] + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "s2", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-01/open" + ], + "type": "section", + "title": "待决事项（请逐项确认）", + "children": [ + { + "id": "list1", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-01/open" + ], + "type": "list", + "items": [ + "旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度？", + "并发审批上限：50 还是 200？", + "归档年限：3 年还是 5 年？", + "供应商是否要求驻场实施？" + ] + }, + { + "id": "act1", + "type": "actions", + "actions": [ + { + "id": "confirm", + "label": "确认范围", + "style": "primary" + } + ] + } + ] + } + ] + }, + "stats_final": { + "nodes": 6, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "kv", + "kv", + "section", + "list", + "actions" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "req:eval/ri-01/context", + "req:eval/ri-01/open" + ], + "idsProvided": 6 + }, + "wall_s": 25.2 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/ri-03.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/ri-03.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..9a36e002 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/ri-03.json @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +{ + "task": "ri-03", + "family": "requirement-input", + "arm": "G-hs", + "model": "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed", + "goalKind": "collect", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 1954, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 817, + "completion_tokens": 1137, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 443 + } + }, + "latency_s": 16.12 + }, + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 2122, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 860, + "completion_tokens": 1262, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 443 + } + }, + "latency_s": 16.73 + } + ], + "callCount": 2, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"审批系统合并项目 - 待决问题收集\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-02/context\"],\"markdown\":\"## 项目背景\\n\\n将内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套，目标 **Q1 上线**，预算上限 **40 万元**。\\n\\n**干系人**：财务（审批人）、行政（发起人）、IT（运维）、法务（事后复核）\\n\\n**已定约束**：保留移动端入口；审批链最多 5 级；历史数据只读归档。\"},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-02/open\"],\"form\":{\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"approval_signer\",\"label\":\"验收标准签署人\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[{\"value\":\"finance\",\"label\":\"财务\"},{\"value\":\"admin\",\"label\":\"行政\"}],\"required\":true,\"placeholder\":\"请选择签署方\",\"help\":\"由谁最终签署确认验收标准\"},{\"key\":\"concurrent_limit\",\"label\":\"并发审批上限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[{\"value\":\"50\",\"label\":\"50 并发\"},{\"value\":\"200\",\"label\":\"200 并发\"}],\"required\":true,\"placeholder\":\"请选择并发上限\",\"help\":\"系统需支持的并发审批数量峰值\"},{\"key\":\"vendor_onsite\",\"label\":\"供应商是否要求驻场实施\",\"type\":\"boolean\",\"required\":true,\"help\":\"驻场实施可能影响项目周期与成本\"},{\"key\":\"retention_period\",\"label\":\"归档年限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[{\"value\":\"3\",\"label\":\"3 年\"},{\"value\":\"5\",\"label\":\"5 年\"}],\"required\":true,\"placeholder\":\"请选择归档年限\",\"help\":\"历史审批数据只读归档的保留期限\"}]}}]}", + "valid_first": false, + "errors_first": [ + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None" + ], + "stats_first": { + "nodes": 2, + "maxDepth": 1, + "types": [], + "refsUsed": [], + "unknownRefs": [] + }, + "raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"审批系统合并项目 - 待决问题收集\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-02/context\"],\"markdown\":\"## 项目背景\\n- 目标：内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套\\n- 预算上限：40 万\\n- 期望上线时间：Q1\\n- 已定：保留移动端入口；审批链最多 5 级；历史数据只读归档\"},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-02/context\"],\"markdown\":\"## 干系人\\n- 财务（审批人）\\n- 行政（发起人）\\n- IT（运维）\\n- 法务（事后复核合同）\"},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-02/open\"],\"markdown\":\"请完成以下待决问题的填写，以便推进项目进入下一阶段。带 * 的字段为必填项。\"},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-02/open\"],\"form\":{\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"signatory\",\"label\":\"验收标准签署人 *\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"财务\",\"行政\"],\"required\":true,\"placeholder\":\"请选择\",\"help\":\"确定由谁最终签署验收标准文档\"},{\"key\":\"concurrent_limit\",\"label\":\"并发审批上限 *\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"50\",\"200\"],\"required\":true,\"placeholder\":\"请选择\",\"help\":\"系统需支持的最大并发审批数\"},{\"key\":\"on_site_required\",\"label\":\"供应商是否要求驻场实施 *\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"是\",\"否\"],\"required\":true,\"placeholder\":\"请选择\",\"help\":\"供应商实施阶段是否需要在客户现场\"},{\"key\":\"retention_years\",\"label\":\"归档年限 *\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"3年\",\"5年\"],\"required\":true,\"placeholder\":\"请选择\",\"help\":\"历史审批数据的保存期限\"}]}}]}", + "repaired": true, + "valid_final": false, + "errors_final": [ + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None" + ], + "spec": null, + "wall_s": 32.9 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/ri-04.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/ri-04.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..960f36e0 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G-hs/ri-04.json @@ -0,0 +1,188 @@ +{ + "task": "ri-04", + "family": "requirement-input", + "arm": "G-hs", + "model": "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed", + "goalKind": "confirm", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 2053, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 815, + "completion_tokens": 1238, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 443 + } + }, + "latency_s": 15.35 + }, + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 3381, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 862, + "completion_tokens": 2519, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 443 + } + }, + "latency_s": 28.37 + } + ], + "callCount": 2, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"审批系统合并范围确认\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/context\",\"req:eval/ri-03/open\"],\"compare\":{\"left\":{\"title\":\"已定约束\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"预算上限\",\"40万元\"],[\"上线时间\",\"Q1季度\"],[\"移动端入口\",\"保留\"],[\"审批链层级\",\"最多5级\"],[\"历史数据\",\"只读归档\"]]}},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/context\"],\"markdown\":\"**干系人职责**\"},{\"id\":\"n1c\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/context\"],\"list\":{\"items\":[\"财务 → 审批人\",\"行政 → 发起人\",\"IT → 运维\",\"法务 → 事后复核合同\"]}}]},\"right\":{\"title\":\"待决事项（逐项确认）\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/open\"],\"markdown\":\"以下4项需干系人拉齐后纳入SOW\"},\"id\":\"n2a\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/open\"],\"form\":{\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"paper_fallback\",\"label\":\"纸质兜底流程\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"保留\",\"取消\",\"另议\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"行政坚持 vs IT反对，需决策\"},{\"key\":\"acceptance_signer\",\"label\":\"验收标准签署人\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"财务\",\"行政\",\"财务+行政联合\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"明确谁对交付物具有签字确认权\"},{\"key\":\"concurrent_limit\",\"label\":\"并发审批上限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"50\",\"200\",\"按需评估\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"影响系统架构选型与数据库容量规划\"},{\"key\":\"onsite_required\",\"label\":\"供应商驻场要求\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"必须驻场\",\"可远程\",\"视项目阶段定\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"影响合同条款与差旅成本\"}]}}]}}}]}", + "valid_first": false, + "errors_first": [ + "JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 583 (char 582)" + ], + "stats_first": null, + "raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"审批系统合并项目 - 范围确认页\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/context\"],\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"已定约束\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/context\"],\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"项目范围\",\"内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套\"],[\"预算上限\",\"40 万元\"],[\"上线时间\",\"Q1\"],[\"移动端入口\",\"保留\"],[\"审批链深度\",\"最多 5 级\"],[\"历史数据\",\"只读归档\"]]},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/context\"],\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"财务\",\"审批人\"],[\"行政\",\"发起人\"],[\"IT\",\"运维\"],[\"法务\",\"事后复核合同\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/open\"],\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"待决事项\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/open\"],\"type\":\"compare\",\"compare\":{\"left\":{\"title\":\"行政坚持\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2a1\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**需要纸质兜底流程**\\n\\n理由：确保系统故障时审批业务不中断，满足合规审计要求。\"}]},\"right\":{\"title\":\"IT 反对\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2a2\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**不需要纸质兜底**\\n\\n理由：增加流程复杂度，与数字化转型目标冲突，维护成本高。\"}]}}},{\"id\":\"n2b\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/open\"],\"type\":\"list\",\"items\":[\"验收标准签署人：财务还是行政？\",\"并发审批上限：50 还是 200？\",\"供应商是否要求驻场实施？\"]}]}]}", + "repaired": true, + "valid_final": true, + "errors_final": [], + "spec": { + "title": "审批系统合并项目 - 范围确认页", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n1", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-03/context" + ], + "type": "section", + "title": "已定约束", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n1a", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-03/context" + ], + "type": "kv", + "kv": [ + [ + "项目范围", + "内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套" + ], + [ + "预算上限", + "40 万元" + ], + [ + "上线时间", + "Q1" + ], + [ + "移动端入口", + "保留" + ], + [ + "审批链深度", + "最多 5 级" + ], + [ + "历史数据", + "只读归档" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "n1b", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-03/context" + ], + "type": "kv", + "kv": [ + [ + "财务", + "审批人" + ], + [ + "行政", + "发起人" + ], + [ + "IT", + "运维" + ], + [ + "法务", + "事后复核合同" + ] + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n2", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-03/open" + ], + "type": "section", + "title": "待决事项", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n2a", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-03/open" + ], + "type": "compare", + "compare": { + "left": { + "title": "行政坚持", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n2a1", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "**需要纸质兜底流程**\n\n理由：确保系统故障时审批业务不中断，满足合规审计要求。" + } + ] + }, + "right": { + "title": "IT 反对", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n2a2", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "**不需要纸质兜底**\n\n理由：增加流程复杂度，与数字化转型目标冲突，维护成本高。" + } + ] + } + } + }, + { + "id": "n2b", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-03/open" + ], + "type": "list", + "items": [ + "验收标准签署人：财务还是行政？", + "并发审批上限：50 还是 200？", + "供应商是否要求驻场实施？" + ] + } + ] + } + ] + }, + "stats_final": { + "nodes": 8, + "maxDepth": 3, + "types": [ + "section", + "kv", + "kv", + "section", + "compare", + "markdown", + "markdown", + "list" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "req:eval/ri-03/context", + "req:eval/ri-03/open" + ], + "idsProvided": 8 + }, + "wall_s": 43.7 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-01.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-01.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..92fea9cb --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-01.json @@ -0,0 +1,322 @@ +{ + "task": "rc-01", + "family": "research-compare", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "compare", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 5303, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1091, + "completion_tokens": 4212, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 0 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 37.8 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"三家候选工具选型对比 — 决策会一页\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"一、概览\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3\"],\"markdown\":\"本期评估三家候选：VaultKeep（权限中枢，2022-08 上线）、LarkPipe（消息管道，2019-03 上线）、NexusGrid（数据表格，2021-11 上线）。三者分属不同品类，并非完全互斥；本页聚焦能力、价格、部署形态与运维风险，给出选型建议。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"二、核心维度对比\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"table\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3\"],\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"dim\",\"label\":\"维度\"},{\"key\":\"v1\",\"label\":\"VaultKeep\"},{\"key\":\"v2\",\"label\":\"LarkPipe\"},{\"key\":\"v3\",\"label\":\"NexusGrid\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"r1\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"品类\"],[\"v1\",\"权限中枢\"],[\"v2\",\"消息管道\"],[\"v3\",\"数据表格\"]]},{\"id\":\"r2\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"上线时间\"],[\"v1\",\"2022-08\"],[\"v2\",\"2019-03\"],[\"v3\",\"2021-11\"]]},{\"id\":\"r3\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"核心能力\"],[\"v1\",\"RBAC / 临时令牌 / 密钥轮换\"],[\"v2\",\"Webhook 路由 / 重试策略 / 模板变量\"],[\"v3\",\"虚拟滚动 / 单元格校验 / 导出 Excel\"]]},{\"id\":\"r4\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"报价\"],[\"v1\",\"¥15 / 人 / 天\"],[\"v2\",\"¥5 / 人 / 天\"],[\"v3\",\"¥12 / 人 / 天\"]]},{\"id\":\"r5\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"部署形态\"],[\"v1\",\"国密支持\"],[\"v2\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"v3\",\"私有化可选\"]]},{\"id\":\"r6\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"近半年发布\"],[\"v1\",\"7 次\"],[\"v2\",\"2 次\"],[\"v3\",\"7 次\"]]},{\"id\":\"r7\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"平均修复周期\"],[\"v1\",\"3 天\"],[\"v2\",\"1 天\"],[\"v3\",\"4 天\"]]}]}},{\"id\":\"n2b\",\"type\":\"chart-lite\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3\"],\"chart\":{\"kind\":\"bar\",\"labels\":[\"VaultKeep\",\"LarkPipe\",\"NexusGrid\"],\"series\":[15,5,12]}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"三、尽调风险备忘\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"],\"kv\":[[\"供应商锁定（中）\",\"私有 API 占比 40%\"],[\"培训成本（低）\",\"界面术语与现有系统不一致\"],[\"升级断层（中）\",\"近两季度仅小版本\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"四、建议与理由\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"三家分属不同品类，建议按业务主线分别落地，而非三选一。\\n\\n- **权限主线 → 首选 VaultKeep。** RBAC + 临时令牌 + 密钥轮换形成闭环，国密支持契合合规；近半年 7 次发布、3 天修复周期反映团队活跃。建议同步在合同中约定接口开放与数据导出条款，缓解「私有 API 占比 40%」的供应商锁定风险。\\n\\n- **消息通知层 → 首选 LarkPipe 试点。** 报价最低（¥5/人/天）、修复最快（1 天），适合作为打通各业务系统的轻量粘合层；但「仅 SaaS」对数据敏感场景是硬约束，上量前需对齐合规边界。\\n\\n- **表格协作层 → 评估 NexusGrid。** 能力贴合度高、私有化可选兼顾合规；价格中等、修复 4 天可接受。\\n\\n**落地顺序建议：** 先以 VaultKeep 立权限基线（同步锁定缓解条款）→ LarkPipe 用于系统间消息打通 → NexusGrid 在表格协作场景试点验证。若合规上无法接受私有 API 锁定，则降级为「LarkPipe + 自研权限」的组合方案，并在 SLA 中明确培训成本与升级断口的应对责任。\"}}]}]}", + "valid_first": true, + "errors_first": [], + "stats_first": { + "nodes": 8, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "markdown", + "section", + "table", + "section", + "kv", + "section", + "markdown" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo", + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3" + ], + "unknownRefs": [] + }, + "repaired": false, + "valid_final": true, + "errors_final": [], + "spec": { + "title": "三家候选工具选型对比 — 决策会一页", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n1", + "type": "section", + "title": "一、概览", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n1a", + "type": "markdown", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3" + ], + "markdown": "本期评估三家候选：VaultKeep（权限中枢，2022-08 上线）、LarkPipe（消息管道，2019-03 上线）、NexusGrid（数据表格，2021-11 上线）。三者分属不同品类，并非完全互斥；本页聚焦能力、价格、部署形态与运维风险，给出选型建议。" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n2", + "type": "section", + "title": "二、核心维度对比", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n2a", + "type": "table", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3" + ], + "table": { + "columns": [ + { + "key": "dim", + "label": "维度" + }, + { + "key": "v1", + "label": "VaultKeep" + }, + { + "key": "v2", + "label": "LarkPipe" + }, + { + "key": "v3", + "label": "NexusGrid" + } + ], + "rows": [ + { + "id": "r1", + "cells": [ + [ + "dim", + "品类" + ], + [ + "v1", + "权限中枢" + ], + [ + "v2", + "消息管道" + ], + [ + "v3", + "数据表格" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r2", + "cells": [ + [ + "dim", + "上线时间" + ], + [ + "v1", + "2022-08" + ], + [ + "v2", + "2019-03" + ], + [ + "v3", + "2021-11" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r3", + "cells": [ + [ + "dim", + "核心能力" + ], + [ + "v1", + "RBAC / 临时令牌 / 密钥轮换" + ], + [ + "v2", + "Webhook 路由 / 重试策略 / 模板变量" + ], + [ + "v3", + "虚拟滚动 / 单元格校验 / 导出 Excel" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r4", + "cells": [ + [ + "dim", + "报价" + ], + [ + "v1", + "¥15 / 人 / 天" + ], + [ + "v2", + "¥5 / 人 / 天" + ], + [ + "v3", + "¥12 / 人 / 天" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r5", + "cells": [ + [ + "dim", + "部署形态" + ], + [ + "v1", + "国密支持" + ], + [ + "v2", + "仅 SaaS" + ], + [ + "v3", + "私有化可选" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r6", + "cells": [ + [ + "dim", + "近半年发布" + ], + [ + "v1", + "7 次" + ], + [ + "v2", + "2 次" + ], + [ + "v3", + "7 次" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r7", + "cells": [ + [ + "dim", + "平均修复周期" + ], + [ + "v1", + "3 天" + ], + [ + "v2", + "1 天" + ], + [ + "v3", + "4 天" + ] + ] + } + ] + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n3", + "type": "section", + "title": "三、尽调风险备忘", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n3a", + "type": "kv", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo" + ], + "kv": [ + [ + "供应商锁定（中）", + "私有 API 占比 40%" + ], + [ + "培训成本（低）", + "界面术语与现有系统不一致" + ], + [ + "升级断层（中）", + "近两季度仅小版本" + ] + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n4", + "type": "section", + "title": "四、建议与理由", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n4a", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "三家分属不同品类，建议按业务主线分别落地，而非三选一：\n\n- 权限主线 → 首选 VaultKeep。RBAC + 临时令牌 + 密钥轮换形成闭环，国密支持契合合规；近半年 7 次发布反映团队活跃。建议同步要求合同约定接口开放与数据导出条款，缓解私有 API 40% 的锁定风险。\n\n- 消息通知层 → 首选 LarkPipe 试点。报价最低（¥5/人/天）、修复最快（1 天），适合作为打通各业务系统的轻量粘合层。但「仅 SaaS」对数据敏感场景是硬约束，上量前需对齐合规边界。\n\n- 表格协作层 → 评估 NexusGrid。能力贴合度高，私有化可选兼顾合规；价格中等、修复 4 天可接受。\n\n落地顺序建议：先以 VaultKeep 立权限基线（同步锁定缓解条款）→ LarkPipe 用于系统间消息打通 → NexusGrid 在表格协作场景试点验证。若合规上无法接受私有 API 锁定，则降级为 LarkPipe + 自研权限的组合方案。" + } + ] + } + ] + }, + "stats_final": { + "nodes": 8, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "markdown", + "section", + "table", + "section", + "kv", + "section", + "markdown" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo", + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3" + ], + "idsProvided": 8 + }, + "wall_s": 37.8, + "raw_first_original": "The user wants a single-page selection comparison for a decision meeting, highlighting the capabilities, pricing, and deployment differences of three vendors, plus my recommendations and reasoning.\n\nLet me design this page:\n\n1. Top section: Title and overview\n2. Comparison: A compare or table node showing the three vendors side by side\n3. Risk section: From the risk memo\n4. Recommendation: My analysis in markdown (no source)\n\nLet me think about structure:\n\n- section (overview)\n - markdown (intro/overview)\n- section (capability comparison)\n - table (key dimensions: capability, price, deployment, release freq, fix cycle)\n- section (risks)\n - list or kv\n- section (recommendation)\n - markdown (my recommendation with reasoning)\n\nLet me build this:\n\nTitle: \"权限与协作工具选型对比 — 决策会一页\"\n\nNodes:\n- n1: section \"概览\"\n - n1a: markdown - brief intro\n- n2: section \"能力 · 价格 · 部署\"\n - n2a: table with columns: 维度, VaultKeep, LarkPipe, NexusGrid\n - rows: 类别, 核心能力, 报价, 部署形态, 近半年发布, 平均修复周期, 上线时间\n- n3: section \"风险备忘\"\n - n3a: kv for risks\n- n4: section \"建议与理由\"\n - n4a: markdown - recommendation\n\nLet me check the table structure: columns with key/label, rows with cells [key, value].\n\nActually, looking more carefully, I should use compare for the side-by-side or table. Table is good here since we have multiple dimensions.\n\nLet me also consider: the user wants three vendors compared. I could use compare (left/right) but that only gives 2 sides. Better to use table for 3-way comparison.\n\nActually, I could do a compare with the three vendors... no, compare only has left/right. Let me use table.\n\nLet me plan table:\n- columns: 维度, VaultKeep, LarkPipe, NexusGrid\n- rows:\n - id: r1, cells: 类别, 权限中枢类工具, 消息管道类工具, 数据表格类工具\n - r2: 核心能力, RBAC/临时令牌/密钥轮换, Webhook路由/重试策略/模板变量, 虚拟滚动/单元格校验/导出Excel\n - r3: 报价, ¥15/人/天, ¥5/人/天, ¥12/人/天\n - r4: 部署形态, 国密支持, 仅SaaS, 私有化可选\n - r5: 上线时间, 2022-08, 2019-03, 2021-11\n - r6: 近半年发布, 7次, 2次, 1天 (wait, 7次)\n - r7: 平均修复周期, 3天, 1天, 4天\n\nWait, let me reread:\n- vendor1: 近半年发布 7 次, 平均修复周期 3 天\n- vendor2: 近半年发布 2 次, 平均修复周期 1 天\n- vendor3: 近半年发布 7 次, 平均修复周期 4 天\n\nOK.\n\nSources:\n- vendor1 facts → doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1\n- vendor2 facts → doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2\n- vendor3 facts → doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3\n- risk facts → doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\n- recommendation → no source (analysis)\n\nLet me finalize. I'll keep it under 200 nodes, easy.\n\nStructure:\n{\n \"title\": \"权限与协作工具选型对比 — 决策会一页\",\n \"nodes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n1\",\n \"type\": \"section\",\n \"title\": \"一、概览\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n1a\",\n \"type\": \"markdown\",\n \"markdown\": \"本页对比三家候选工具...（简要说明）\"\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n2\",\n \"type\": \"section\",\n \"title\": \"二、能力 · 价格 · 部署\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n2a\",\n \"type\": \"table\",\n \"table\": {\n \"columns\": [\n {\"key\": \"dim\", \"label\": \"维度\"},\n {\"key\": \"v1\", \"label\": \"VaultKeep\"},\n {\"key\": \"v2\", \"label\": \"LarkPipe\"},\n {\"key\": \"v3\", \"label\": \"NexusGrid\"}\n ],\n \"rows\": [\n {\"id\": \"r1\", \"cells\": [[\"dim\",\"类别\"],[\"v1\",\"权限中枢类工具\"],[\"v2\",\"消息管道类工具\"],[\"v3\",\"数据表格类工具\"]]},\n ...\n ]\n }\n }\n ]\n },\n ...\n ]\n}\n\nLet me check cell format: \"cells\":[[\"列key\",\"值\"],...]. So each cell is [columnKey, value]. The cells must match columns order.\n\nLet me also add compare for capability comparison if helpful. Actually, I'll add a compare for capability focus, since they are 3 different categories, comparing them in pairs might help. Hmm, but compare only has left/right. Let me just use table.\n\nActually, I think the cleanest is:\n- Overview section with markdown intro\n- Main comparison table\n- Risk section\n- Recommendation section\n\nLet me write it out.\n\nFor the risks, I'll use a kv or list:\nkv: [[\"供应商锁定（中）\",\"私有API占比40%\"],[\"培训成本（低）\",\"界面术语不一致\"],[\"升级断层（中）\",\"近两季度仅小版本\"]]\n\nHmm, kv is good.\n\nFor recommendation markdown, I should give a clear recommendation with reasoning. Since the three are in different categories (权限中枢, 消息管道, 数据表格), they might actually serve different needs. The recommendation should clarify this.\n\nLet me draft the recommendation:\n\"三家产品分属不同品类（权限中枢 / 消息管道 / 数据表格），并非完全互斥。决策建议：\n\n1. 若本期目标是【权限统一】—— 首选 VaultKeep：RBAC + 临时令牌 + 密钥轮换形成闭环，国密支持契合合规要求；近半年高频迭代（7次）说明团队活跃，但需评估供应商锁定（私有API 40%）风险，建议合同约定接口开放与数据导出条款。\n\n2. 若需打通业务系统【消息通知】—— 首选 LarkPipe：报价最低（¥5/人/天）、修复最快（1天），但仅SaaS形态对数据出境敏感场景是硬伤，需结合合规边界判断。\n\n3. 若核心需求是【表格协作】—— 首选 NexusGrid：能力贴合度高，私有化可选兼顾合规；价格中等。\n\n综合排序建议：权限主线优先 VaultKeep（配合接口锁定缓解条款），消息层用 LarkPipe 试点，表格层评估 NexusGrid。若预算或合规不允许私有API锁定，则降级为 LarkPipe + 自研权限。\"\n\nThat's reasonable.\n\nLet me also consider: should I add a steps or timeline? Not really needed here. The structure is: overview, comparison, risks, recommendation. Simple and effective.\n\nLet me count nodes:\n- n1 (section)\n - n1a (markdown)\n- n2 (section)\n - n2a (table)\n- n3 (section)\n - n3a (kv)\n- n4 (section)\n - n4a (markdown)\n\nTotal: 4 sections + 4 children = 8 nodes. Well within limits.\n\nLet me also add source attribution properly. Sources should be on the leaf nodes containing facts.\n\nn1a (overview markdown) - can have source ids referencing all three vendors\nn2a (table) - source per row, or just one source covering all? Each cell corresponds to a vendor, so I could attribute per row. But the table itself can have a \"source\" array. Let me put all three vendor sourceIds on the table since facts come from all three.\n\nn3a (kv for risks) - source: doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\n\nn4a (recommendation markdown) - no source (analysis).\n\nLet me finalize.\n\nActually wait - looking at the source field rules: \"source\" is an array of sourceIds supporting that node's factual content. For the table, since multiple rows reference different vendor docs, I should put all three vendor sourceIds.\n\nLet me write the final JSON.\n\nOne more consideration: should I use chart-lite for the pricing comparison? It could be nice (bar chart of prices). Let me add one to make it visual.\n\nActually, let's keep it focused. The table already shows prices clearly. Adding a chart might be overkill. But the rules say \"横向比较→compare/table\" — so table is the right choice.\n\nLet me also think about whether compare would work. compare has left and right, each with title/tone/nodes. I could compare VaultKeep vs NexusGrid (or any pair), or do nested... no, only 2 sides. So table it is for 3-way.\n\nFinal structure:\n\n```json\n{\n \"title\": \"三家候选工具选型对比 — 决策会一页\",\n \"nodes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n1\",\n \"type\": \"section\",\n \"title\": \"一、概览\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n1a\",\n \"type\": \"markdown\",\n \"source\": [\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1\", \"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2\", \"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3\"],\n \"markdown\": \"本期评估三家候选：VaultKeep（权限中枢，2022-08 上线）、LarkPipe（消息管道，2019-03 上线）、NexusGrid（数据表格，2021-11 上线）。三者分属不同品类，并非完全互斥；本页聚焦能力、价格、部署形态与运维风险，给出选型建议。\"\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n2\",\n \"type\": \"section\",\n \"title\": \"二、核心维度对比\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n2a\",\n \"type\": \"table\",\n \"source\": [\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1\", \"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2\", \"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3\"],\n \"table\": {\n \"columns\": [\n {\"key\": \"dim\", \"label\": \"维度\"},\n {\"key\": \"v1\", \"label\": \"VaultKeep\"},\n {\"key\": \"v2\", \"label\": \"LarkPipe\"},\n {\"key\": \"v3\", \"label\": \"NexusGrid\"}\n ],\n \"rows\": [\n {\"id\": \"r1\", \"cells\": [[\"dim\",\"品类\"],[\"v1\",\"权限中枢\"],[\"v2\",\"消息管道\"],[\"v3\",\"数据表格\"]]},\n {\"id\": \"r2\", \"cells\": [[\"dim\",\"上线时间\"],[\"v1\",\"2022-08\"],[\"v2\",\"2019-03\"],[\"v3\",\"2021-11\"]]},\n {\"id\": \"r3\", \"cells\": [[\"dim\",\"核心能力\"],[\"v1\",\"RBAC / 临时令牌 / 密钥轮换\"],[\"v2\",\"Webhook 路由 / 重试策略 / 模板变量\"],[\"v3\",\"虚拟滚动 / 单元格校验 / 导出 Excel\"]]},\n {\"id\": \"r4\", \"cells\": [[\"dim\",\"报价\"],[\"v1\",\"¥15 / 人 / 天\"],[\"v2\",\"¥5 / 人 / 天\"],[\"v3\",\"¥12 / 人 / 天\"]]},\n {\"id\": \"r5\", \"cells\": [[\"dim\",\"部署形态\"],[\"v1\",\"国密支持\"],[\"v2\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"v3\",\"私有化可选\"]]},\n {\"id\": \"r6\", \"cells\": [[\"dim\",\"近半年发布\"],[\"v1\",\"7 次\"],[\"v2\",\"2 次\"],[\"v3\",\"7 次\"]]},\n {\"id\": \"r7\", \"cells\": [[\"dim\",\"平均修复周期\"],[\"v1\",\"3 天\"],[\"v2\",\"1 天\"],[\"v3\",\"4 天\"]]}\n ]\n }\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n3\",\n \"type\": \"section\",\n \"title\": \"三、尽调风险备忘\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n3a\",\n \"type\": \"kv\",\n \"source\": [\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"],\n \"kv\": [\n [\"供应商锁定（中）\", \"私有 API 占比 40%\"],\n [\"培训成本（低）\", \"界面术语与现有系统不一致\"],\n [\"升级断层（中）\", \"近两季度仅小版本\"]\n ]\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n4\",\n \"type\": \"section\",\n \"title\": \"四、建议与理由\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n4a\",\n \"type\": \"markdown\",\n \"markdown\": \"三家分属不同品类，建议按业务主线分别落地，而非三选一：\\n\\n- 权限主线 → 首选 VaultKeep。RBAC + 临时令牌 + 密钥轮换形成闭环，国密支持契合合规；近半年 7 次发布反映团队活跃。建议同步要求合同约定接口开放与数据导出条款，缓解私有 API 40% 的锁定风险。\\n\\n- 消息通知层 → 首选 LarkPipe 试点。报价最低（¥5/人/天）、修复最快（1 天），适合作为打通各业务系统的轻量粘合层。但「仅 SaaS」对数据敏感场景是硬约束，上量前需对齐合规边界。\\n\\n- 表格协作层 → 评估 NexusGrid。能力贴合度高，私有化可选兼顾合规；价格中等、修复 4 天可接受。\\n\\n落地顺序建议：先以 VaultKeep 立权限基线（同步锁定缓解条款）→ LarkPipe 用于系统间消息打通 → NexusGrid 在表格协作场景试点验证。若合规上无法接受私有 API 锁定，则降级为 LarkPipe + 自研权限的组合方案。\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n}\n```\n\nLet me double-check:\n- All types are in the catalog: section, table, kv, markdown ✓\n- All fields match: section has title/children, table has table.columns/rows with cells, kv has kv array, markdown has markdown string ✓\n- Sources match materials ✓\n- Recommendation markdown has no source ✓\n- Within 200 nodes, 8 levels, 256KiB ✓\n- Only output JSON object ✓\n\nLooks good. Let me finalize.\n\n{\"title\":\"三家候选工具选型对比 — 决策会一页\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"一、概览\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3\"],\"markdown\":\"本期评估三家候选：VaultKeep（权限中枢，2022-08 上线）、LarkPipe（消息管道，2019-03 上线）、NexusGrid（数据表格，2021-11 上线）。三者分属不同品类，并非完全互斥；本页聚焦能力、价格、部署形态与运维风险，给出选型建议。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"二、核心维度对比\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"table\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3\"],\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"dim\",\"label\":\"维度\"},{\"key\":\"v1\",\"label\":\"VaultKeep\"},{\"key\":\"v2\",\"label\":\"LarkPipe\"},{\"key\":\"v3\",\"label\":\"NexusGrid\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"r1\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"品类\"],[\"v1\",\"权限中枢\"],[\"v2\",\"消息管道\"],[\"v3\",\"数据表格\"]]},{\"id\":\"r2\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"上线时间\"],[\"v1\",\"2022-08\"],[\"v2\",\"2019-03\"],[\"v3\",\"2021-11\"]]},{\"id\":\"r3\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"核心能力\"],[\"v1\",\"RBAC / 临时令牌 / 密钥轮换\"],[\"v2\",\"Webhook 路由 / 重试策略 / 模板变量\"],[\"v3\",\"虚拟滚动 / 单元格校验 / 导出 Excel\"]]},{\"id\":\"r4\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"报价\"],[\"v1\",\"¥15 / 人 / 天\"],[\"v2\",\"¥5 / 人 / 天\"],[\"v3\",\"¥12 / 人 / 天\"]]},{\"id\":\"r5\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"部署形态\"],[\"v1\",\"国密支持\"],[\"v2\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"v3\",\"私有化可选\"]]},{\"id\":\"r6\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"近半年发布\"],[\"v1\",\"7 次\"],[\"v2\",\"2 次\"],[\"v3\",\"7 次\"]]},{\"id\":\"r7\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"平均修复周期\"],[\"v1\",\"3 天\"],[\"v2\",\"1 天\"],[\"v3\",\"4 天\"]]}]}},{\"id\":\"n2b\",\"type\":\"chart-lite\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3\"],\"chart\":{\"kind\":\"bar\",\"labels\":[\"VaultKeep\",\"LarkPipe\",\"NexusGrid\"],\"series\":[15,5,12]}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"三、尽调风险备忘\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"],\"kv\":[[\"供应商锁定（中）\",\"私有 API 占比 40%\"],[\"培训成本（低）\",\"界面术语与现有系统不一致\"],[\"升级断层（中）\",\"近两季度仅小版本\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"四、建议与理由\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"三家分属不同品类，建议按业务主线分别落地，而非三选一。\\n\\n- **权限主线 → 首选 VaultKeep。** RBAC + 临时令牌 + 密钥轮换形成闭环，国密支持契合合规；近半年 7 次发布、3 天修复周期反映团队活跃。建议同步在合同中约定接口开放与数据导出条款，缓解「私有 API 占比 40%」的供应商锁定风险。\\n\\n- **消息通知层 → 首选 LarkPipe 试点。** 报价最低（¥5/人/天）、修复最快（1 天），适合作为打通各业务系统的轻量粘合层；但「仅 SaaS」对数据敏感场景是硬约束，上量前需对齐合规边界。\\n\\n- **表格协作层 → 评估 NexusGrid。** 能力贴合度高、私有化可选兼顾合规；价格中等、修复 4 天可接受。\\n\\n**落地顺序建议：** 先以 VaultKeep 立权限基线（同步锁定缓解条款）→ LarkPipe 用于系统间消息打通 → NexusGrid 在表格协作场景试点验证。若合规上无法接受私有 API 锁定，则降级为「LarkPipe + 自研权限」的组合方案，并在 SLA 中明确培训成本与升级断口的应对责任。\"}}]}]}" +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-02.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-02.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..9ad30bcd --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-02.json @@ -0,0 +1,425 @@ +{ + "task": "rc-02", + "family": "research-compare", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "risk", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 6628, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1092, + "completion_tokens": 5536, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 0 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 0 + } + }, + "latency_s": 43.89 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"候选工具尽调 · 风险分析\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"评估概览\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"本轮尽调覆盖三类工具（权限中枢 / 消息管道 / 数据表格），本页聚焦于风控评审所需的风险视图。下方表格汇总三家供应商的关键事实以建立语境，后续章节将风险按严重度组织并标注判断。\"},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"type\":\"table\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3\"],\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"vendor\",\"label\":\"供应商\"},{\"key\":\"cat\",\"label\":\"品类\"},{\"key\":\"online\",\"label\":\"上线\"},{\"key\":\"price\",\"label\":\"报价\"},{\"key\":\"deploy\",\"label\":\"部署形态\"},{\"key\":\"rel\",\"label\":\"半年发布\"},{\"key\":\"fix\",\"label\":\"平均修复周期\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"r1\",\"cells\":[[\"vendor\",\"VaultKeep\"],[\"cat\",\"权限中枢\"],[\"online\",\"2022-08\"],[\"price\",\"¥15/人/天\"],[\"deploy\",\"国密支持\"],[\"rel\",\"7 次\"],[\"fix\",\"3 天\"]]},{\"id\":\"r2\",\"cells\":[[\"vendor\",\"LarkPipe\"],[\"cat\",\"消息管道\"],[\"online\",\"2019-03\"],[\"price\",\"¥5/人/天\"],[\"deploy\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"rel\",\"2 次\"],[\"fix\",\"1 天\"]]},{\"id\":\"r3\",\"cells\":[[\"vendor\",\"NexusGrid\"],[\"cat\",\"数据表格\"],[\"online\",\"2021-11\"],[\"price\",\"¥12/人/天\"],[\"deploy\",\"私有化可选\"],[\"rel\",\"7 次\"],[\"fix\",\"4 天\"]]}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"风险评级（按严重度）\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"依据内部尽调风险备忘，已识别 2 条中度风险与 1 条低度风险。中度风险关注长期可替换性与演进能力，须以合同条款约束；低度风险属一次性引入成本，可在试点期消化。\"},{\"id\":\"n2b\",\"type\":\"tree\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"],\"tree\":{\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"t1\",\"label\":\"中度风险\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"badge\":\"2\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"t1a\",\"label\":\"供应商锁定\",\"badge\":\"私有 API 40%\"},{\"id\":\"t1b\",\"label\":\"升级断层\",\"badge\":\"两季度仅小版本\"}]},{\"id\":\"t2\",\"label\":\"低度风险\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"badge\":\"1\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"t2a\",\"label\":\"培训成本\",\"badge\":\"界面术语不一致\"}]}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"逐项风险与判断\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"中 · 供应商锁定\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a1\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"],\"kv\":[[\"严重度\",\"中\"],[\"事实\",\"私有 API 占比 40%\"],[\"来源\",\"尽调风险备忘\"]]},{\"id\":\"n3a2\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"判断：40% 的私有 API 占比位于经验区间（<30% 低 / 30%–60% 中 / >60% 高）的下沿，单独看尚可控，但其风险在于持续累积——若不收敛，2–3 个迭代周期后切换成本将不可逆。建议在合同中要求厂商：(1) 列出全部私有 API 并标注理由；(2) 承诺 12 个月弃用预告期；(3) 核心业务流必须可走标准协议。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n3b\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"中 · 升级断层\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3b1\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"],\"kv\":[[\"严重度\",\"中\"],[\"事实\",\"近两季度仅小版本\"],[\"来源\",\"尽调风险备忘\"]]},{\"id\":\"n3b2\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"判断：发布次数与版本粒度须分开看。VaultKeep 与 NexusGrid 半年发布 7 次，若其中绝大部分是小版本或补丁，说明 API 与数据模型无实质性演进，需求响应能力存疑。建议要求厂商提供未来两季度路线图，并在合同中约定重大版本（minor 以上）的最低发布节奏（如每季度 ≥1）。同时 LarkPipe 修复周期 1 天最快，可作为服务时效性参考基准。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n3c\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"低 · 培训成本\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3c1\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"],\"kv\":[[\"严重度\",\"低\"],[\"事实\",\"界面术语与现有系统不一致\"],[\"来源\",\"尽调风险备忘\"]]},{\"id\":\"n3c2\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"判断：术语不一致属一次性引入成本，可通过术语映射表 + 定制 UI 词典在 1–2 周消化。建议在试点阶段即输出对照表并验证业务可读性，避免扩散至全员后才修补。\"}]}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"给风控评审的综合建议\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"综上，三条风险均不构成阻塞，但需在合同条款与试点计划中预留缓冲：(1) 锁定私有 API 收敛计划与弃用预告期；(2) 设定版本演进节奏门槛；(3) 在试点期消化培训成本。LarkPipe 修复时效最优但仅 SaaS 形态，需与合规要求对齐；VaultKeep / NexusGrid 支持私有化但演进节奏须额外约束。建议附上述三项约束后允许进入下一阶段。\"}]}]}", + "valid_first": true, + "errors_first": [], + "stats_first": { + "nodes": 18, + "maxDepth": 3, + "types": [ + "section", + "markdown", + "table", + "section", + "markdown", + "tree", + "section", + "section", + "kv", + "markdown", + "section", + "kv", + "markdown", + "section", + "kv", + "markdown", + "section", + "markdown" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo", + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3" + ], + "unknownRefs": [] + }, + "repaired": false, + "valid_final": true, + "errors_final": [], + "spec": { + "title": "候选工具尽调 · 风险分析", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n1", + "type": "section", + "title": "评估概览", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n1a", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "本轮尽调覆盖三类工具（权限中枢 / 消息管道 / 数据表格），本页聚焦于风控评审所需的风险视图。下方表格汇总三家供应商的关键事实以建立语境，后续章节将风险按严重度组织并标注判断。" + }, + { + "id": "n1b", + "type": "table", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3" + ], + "table": { + "columns": [ + { + "key": "vendor", + "label": "供应商" + }, + { + "key": "cat", + "label": "品类" + }, + { + "key": "online", + "label": "上线" + }, + { + "key": "price", + "label": "报价" + }, + { + "key": "deploy", + "label": "部署形态" + }, + { + "key": "rel", + "label": "半年发布" + }, + { + "key": "fix", + "label": "平均修复周期" + } + ], + "rows": [ + { + "id": "r1", + "cells": [ + [ + "vendor", + "VaultKeep" + ], + [ + "cat", + "权限中枢" + ], + [ + "online", + "2022-08" + ], + [ + "price", + "¥15/人/天" + ], + [ + "deploy", + "国密支持" + ], + [ + "rel", + "7 次" + ], + [ + "fix", + "3 天" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r2", + "cells": [ + [ + "vendor", + "LarkPipe" + ], + [ + "cat", + "消息管道" + ], + [ + "online", + "2019-03" + ], + [ + "price", + "¥5/人/天" + ], + [ + "deploy", + "仅 SaaS" + ], + [ + "rel", + "2 次" + ], + [ + "fix", + "1 天" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r3", + "cells": [ + [ + "vendor", + "NexusGrid" + ], + [ + "cat", + "数据表格" + ], + [ + "online", + "2021-11" + ], + [ + "price", + "¥12/人/天" + ], + [ + "deploy", + "私有化可选" + ], + [ + "rel", + "7 次" + ], + [ + "fix", + "4 天" + ] + ] + } + ] + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n2", + "type": "section", + "title": "风险评级（按严重度）", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n2a", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "依据内部尽调风险备忘，已识别 2 条中度风险与 1 条低度风险。中度风险关注长期可替换性与演进能力，须以合同条款约束；低度风险属一次性引入成本，可在试点期消化。" + }, + { + "id": "n2b", + "type": "tree", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo" + ], + "tree": { + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "t1", + "label": "中度风险", + "tone": "warn", + "badge": "2", + "children": [ + { + "id": "t1a", + "label": "供应商锁定", + "badge": "私有 API 40%" + }, + { + "id": "t1b", + "label": "升级断层", + "badge": "两季度仅小版本" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "t2", + "label": "低度风险", + "tone": "info", + "badge": "1", + "children": [ + { + "id": "t2a", + "label": "培训成本", + "badge": "界面术语不一致" + } + ] + } + ] + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n3", + "type": "section", + "title": "逐项风险与判断", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n3a", + "type": "section", + "title": "中 · 供应商锁定", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n3a1", + "type": "kv", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo" + ], + "kv": [ + [ + "严重度", + "中" + ], + [ + "事实", + "私有 API 占比 40%" + ], + [ + "来源", + "尽调风险备忘" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "n3a2", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "判断：40% 的私有 API 占比位于经验区间（<30% 低 / 30%–60% 中 / >60% 高）的下沿，单独看尚可控，但其风险在于持续累积——若不收敛，2–3 个迭代周期后切换成本将不可逆。建议在合同中要求厂商：(1) 列出全部私有 API 并标注理由；(2) 承诺 12 个月弃用预告期；(3) 核心业务流必须可走标准协议。" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n3b", + "type": "section", + "title": "中 · 升级断层", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n3b1", + "type": "kv", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo" + ], + "kv": [ + [ + "严重度", + "中" + ], + [ + "事实", + "近两季度仅小版本" + ], + [ + "来源", + "尽调风险备忘" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "n3b2", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "判断：发布次数与版本粒度须分开看。VaultKeep 与 NexusGrid 半年发布 7 次，若其中绝大部分是小版本或补丁，说明 API 与数据模型无实质性演进，需求响应能力存疑。建议要求厂商提供未来两季度路线图，并在合同中约定重大版本（minor 以上）的最低发布节奏（如每季度 ≥1）。同时 LarkPipe 修复周期 1 天最快，可作为服务时效性参考基准。" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n3c", + "type": "section", + "title": "低 · 培训成本", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n3c1", + "type": "kv", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo" + ], + "kv": [ + [ + "严重度", + "低" + ], + [ + "事实", + "界面术语与现有系统不一致" + ], + [ + "来源", + "尽调风险备忘" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "n3c2", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "判断：术语不一致属一次性引入成本，可通过术语映射表 + 定制 UI 词典在 1–2 周消化。建议在试点阶段即输出对照表并验证业务可读性，避免扩散至全员后才修补。" + } + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n4", + "type": "section", + "title": "给风控评审的综合建议", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n4a", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "综上，三条风险均不构成阻塞，但需在合同条款与试点计划中预留缓冲：(1) 锁定私有 API 收敛计划与弃用预告期；(2) 设定版本演进节奏门槛；(3) 在试点期消化培训成本。LarkPipe 修复时效最优但仅 SaaS 形态，需与合规要求对齐；VaultKeep / NexusGrid 支持私有化但演进节奏须额外约束。建议附上述三项约束后允许进入下一阶段。" + } + ] + } + ] + }, + "stats_final": { + "nodes": 18, + "maxDepth": 3, + "types": [ + "section", + "markdown", + "table", + "section", + "markdown", + "tree", + "section", + "section", + "kv", + "markdown", + "section", + "kv", + "markdown", + "section", + "kv", + "markdown", + "section", + "markdown" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo", + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3" + ], + "idsProvided": 18 + }, + "wall_s": 43.9 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-03.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-03.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..27d6a3d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-03.json @@ -0,0 +1,532 @@ +{ + "task": "rc-03", + "family": "research-compare", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "order", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 8974, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1082, + "completion_tokens": 7892, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 1081 + } + }, + "latency_s": 78.18 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"三方工具实施路线图（评审通过后）\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"## 目标与依据\\n本路线图将评审通过的 VaultKeep（权限中枢）、LarkPipe（消息管道）、NexusGrid（数据表格）按依赖顺序分阶段落地。\\n\\n**核心判断（分析内容，不带来源）：**\\n- 权限基座先行：RBAC 与密钥轮换为后续系统共享能力，必须先于数据视图与集成层。\\n- 数据视图并行：NexusGrid 可与 VaultKeep 后半段并行启动，但字段显隐需依赖权限角色映射。\\n- 集成层殿后：LarkPipe 在前两者稳定后再统一接入事件流，避免反复改拓扑。\\n\\n下方表格为事实摘录；阶段、依赖、里程碑、风险应对均为本页规划建议。\"},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"table\",\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"vendor\",\"label\":\"供应商\"},{\"key\":\"scope\",\"label\":\"核心能力\"},{\"key\":\"price\",\"label\":\"报价\"},{\"key\":\"deploy\",\"label\":\"部署形态\"},{\"key\":\"release\",\"label\":\"近半年发布\"},{\"key\":\"fix\",\"label\":\"平均修复\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"r1\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1\"],\"cells\":[[\"vendor\",\"VaultKeep\"],[\"scope\",\"RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换\"],[\"price\",\"¥15/人/天\"],[\"deploy\",\"国密支持\"],[\"release\",\"7 次\"],[\"fix\",\"3 天\"]]},{\"id\":\"r2\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2\"],\"cells\":[[\"vendor\",\"LarkPipe\"],[\"scope\",\"Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量\"],[\"price\",\"¥5/人/天\"],[\"deploy\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"release\",\"2 次\"],[\"fix\",\"1 天\"]]},{\"id\":\"r3\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3\"],\"cells\":[[\"vendor\",\"NexusGrid\"],[\"scope\",\"虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel\"],[\"price\",\"¥12/人/天\"],[\"deploy\",\"私有化可选\"],[\"release\",\"7 次\"],[\"fix\",\"4 天\"]]}]}},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"steps\":{\"current\":0,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"Phase 0 准备（合同/SLA/环境）\",\"status\":\"pending\"},{\"label\":\"Phase 1 VaultKeep 权限基座\",\"status\":\"pending\"},{\"label\":\"Phase 2 NexusGrid 数据视图（并行）\",\"status\":\"pending\"},{\"label\":\"Phase 3 LarkPipe 集成层\",\"status\":\"pending\"},{\"label\":\"Phase 4 联调 UAT + 培训\",\"status\":\"pending\"},{\"label\":\"Phase 5 分批上线 + 回滚预案\",\"status\":\"pending\"}]}},{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"### Phase 0 准备（建议 1–2 周）\\n- 签订三方合同与 SLA：明确数据归属、退出条款与 API 抽象义务（应对锁定风险）。\\n- 完成安全/合规评审：VaultKeep 国密适用边界、LarkPipe SaaS 数据出境评估。\\n- 准备测试/预发/生产三套环境与统一账号体系。\"},{\"id\":\"n3b\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"### Phase 1 VaultKeep 权限基座（建议 3–4 周）\\n- 设计「部门-角色-资源」三层角色矩阵，与现有 IAM 字段映射。\\n- 临时令牌用于对外 API 网关；密钥轮换策略写入 CI。\\n- 试点接入 1 个业务系统，验证角色继承与审批流后再扩大。\"},{\"id\":\"n3c\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"### Phase 2 NexusGrid 数据视图（建议 2–3 周，与 Phase 1 后半段并行）\\n- 数据源接入与口径核对，确定单元格校验规则来源。\\n- 涉及敏感字段时优先选私有化形态。\\n- 性能基线：万级虚拟滚动、Excel 导出压测写入回归门禁。\"},{\"id\":\"n3d\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"### Phase 3 LarkPipe 集成层（建议 1–2 周）\\n- 设计 Webhook 拓扑：VaultKeep 审计事件 + NexusGrid 异常告警 → LarkPipe → IM/工单。\\n- 配置重试与幂等键，避免事件丢失或重复触发。\\n- 模板变量集中登记，便于后续扩通道。\"},{\"id\":\"n3e\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"### Phase 4 联调 UAT + 培训（建议 1–2 周）\\n- 端到端串联：权限变更 → 数据视图字段显隐 → 审计通知外发。\\n- 针对「界面术语与现有系统不一致」组织术语对照培训，聚焦角色名与状态机。\\n- 形成回滚手册与值班手册。\"},{\"id\":\"n3f\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"### Phase 5 分批上线（建议 2–3 周）\\n- 按业务线灰度，每批不超过 20% 用户。\\n- 监控指标：权限失败率、表格渲染 P95、Webhook 重试率。\\n- 任一批失败立即回滚并复盘，再放下一批。\"},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"tree\",\"tree\":{\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"d-root\",\"label\":\"实施依赖关系\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"d-vk\",\"label\":\"VaultKeep（前置基座）\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"badge\":\"阻塞\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"d-vk-iam\",\"label\":\"现有 IAM 字段映射完成\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"id\":\"d-vk-pilot\",\"label\":\"试点业务系统接入通过\",\"tone\":\"ok\"}]},{\"id\":\"d-ng\",\"label\":\"NexusGrid（与基座后半段并行）\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"d-ng-src\",\"label\":\"数据源口径确认\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"id\":\"d-ng-perm\",\"label\":\"字段显隐依赖 VaultKeep 角色映射\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"badge\":\"依赖\"}]},{\"id\":\"d-lp\",\"label\":\"LarkPipe（后置集成层）\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"badge\":\"依赖基座+视图\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"d-lp-vk\",\"label\":\"消费 VaultKeep 审计事件\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"id\":\"d-lp-ng\",\"label\":\"消费 NexusGrid 异常告警\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"id\":\"d-lp-tpl\",\"label\":\"模板变量统一登记\",\"tone\":\"ok\"}]}]}]}},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"timeline\",\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"M0 合同与环境就绪\",\"time\":\"W2\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"markdown\":\"三方合同签毕；三套环境与统一账号体系就绪，SLA 与退出条款敲定。\"},{\"title\":\"M1 权限基座试点通过\",\"time\":\"W6\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"markdown\":\"VaultKeep 在 1 个业务系统验证角色矩阵 + 密钥轮换，IAM 字段映射打通。\"},{\"title\":\"M2 数据视图灰度\",\"time\":\"W9\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"markdown\":\"NexusGrid 受控范围上线，单元格校验与导出回归通过，性能基线达标。\"},{\"title\":\"M3 集成层 UAT 通过\",\"time\":\"W11\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"markdown\":\"VaultKeep 与 NexusGrid 事件稳定外发至 LarkPipe，重试 + 幂等验证通过。\"},{\"title\":\"M4 全量上线与回滚预案就绪\",\"time\":\"W14\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"markdown\":\"培训术语表、监控看板、回滚手册齐备；分批灰度完成，全量切换。\"}]}},{\"id\":\"n6\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"],\"kv\":[[\"供应商锁定\",\"中 · 私有 API 占比 40%\"],[\"培训成本\",\"低 · 界面术语与现有系统不一致\"],[\"升级断层\",\"中 · 近两季度仅小版本\"]]},{\"id\":\"n6a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"### 风险应对建议（仅作规划参考）\\n- **供应商锁定（中）**：合同阶段加入 API 抽象层与替代方案条款；关键功能保留 1 套兜底实现，避免被私有 API 绑死。\\n- **培训成本（低）**：在 Phase 4 输出术语对照表 + 录屏，集中解决角色名、状态机两处不一致。\\n- **升级断层（中）**：约定季度升级窗口，对小版本做自动化回归，避免一次跨多个小版本。\"},{\"id\":\"n7\",\"type\":\"form\",\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"team_size\",\"label\":\"实施团队规模（人）\",\"type\":\"number\",\"placeholder\":\"例如 8\",\"required\":true},{\"key\":\"target_m4\",\"label\":\"期望 M4 全量上线日期\",\"type\":\"text\",\"placeholder\":\"YYYY-MM-DD\",\"required\":true},{\"key\":\"compliance\",\"label\":\"合规与部署偏好\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"国密 + 私有化\",\"仅国密\",\"仅私有化\",\"两者都不要\"],\"default\":\"国密 + 私有化\"},{\"key\":\"pilot_lines\",\"label\":\"灰度业务线\",\"type\":\"textarea\",\"placeholder\":\"例如：财务、供应链\",\"help\":\"每批不超过 20% 用户\"},{\"key\":\"notify_channel\",\"label\":\"LarkPipe 主要落点\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"企业 IM\",\"工单系统\",\"短信网关\",\"邮件\"],\"default\":\"企业 IM\"},{\"key\":\"rolling_back_owner\",\"label\":\"回滚决策负责人\",\"type\":\"text\",\"placeholder\":\"例如：运维负责人 张三\",\"required\":true}]},{\"id\":\"n8\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"export_pdf\",\"label\":\"导出路线图 PDF\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"sync_pm\",\"label\":\"同步到项目管理工具\",\"style\":\"default\"},{\"id\":\"revise\",\"label\":\"请求修订\",\"style\":\"default\"}]},{\"id\":\"n9\",\"type\":\"doc-ref\",\"docId\":\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1\"},{\"id\":\"n10\",\"type\":\"doc-ref\",\"docId\":\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2\"},{\"id\":\"n11\",\"type\":\"doc-ref\",\"docId\":\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3\"},{\"id\":\"n12\",\"type\":\"doc-ref\",\"docId\":\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"}]}", + "valid_first": true, + "errors_first": [], + "stats_first": { + "nodes": 19, + "maxDepth": 1, + "types": [ + "markdown", + "table", + "steps", + "markdown", + "markdown", + "markdown", + "markdown", + "markdown", + "markdown", + "tree", + "timeline", + "kv", + "markdown", + "form", + "actions", + "doc-ref", + "doc-ref", + "doc-ref", + "doc-ref" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo", + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3" + ], + "unknownRefs": [] + }, + "repaired": false, + "valid_final": true, + "errors_final": [], + "spec": { + "title": "三方工具实施路线图（评审通过后）", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n1", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "## 目标与依据\n本路线图将评审通过的 VaultKeep（权限中枢）、LarkPipe（消息管道）、NexusGrid（数据表格）按依赖顺序分阶段落地。\n\n**核心判断（分析内容，不带来源）：**\n- 权限基座先行：RBAC 与密钥轮换为后续系统共享能力，必须先于数据视图与集成层。\n- 数据视图并行：NexusGrid 可与 VaultKeep 后半段并行启动，但字段显隐需依赖权限角色映射。\n- 集成层殿后：LarkPipe 在前两者稳定后再统一接入事件流，避免反复改拓扑。\n\n下方表格为事实摘录；阶段、依赖、里程碑、风险应对均为本页规划建议。" + }, + { + "id": "n2", + "type": "table", + "table": { + "columns": [ + { + "key": "vendor", + "label": "供应商" + }, + { + "key": "scope", + "label": "核心能力" + }, + { + "key": "price", + "label": "报价" + }, + { + "key": "deploy", + "label": "部署形态" + }, + { + "key": "release", + "label": "近半年发布" + }, + { + "key": "fix", + "label": "平均修复" + } + ], + "rows": [ + { + "id": "r1", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1" + ], + "cells": [ + [ + "vendor", + "VaultKeep" + ], + [ + "scope", + "RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换" + ], + [ + "price", + "¥15/人/天" + ], + [ + "deploy", + "国密支持" + ], + [ + "release", + "7 次" + ], + [ + "fix", + "3 天" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r2", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2" + ], + "cells": [ + [ + "vendor", + "LarkPipe" + ], + [ + "scope", + "Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量" + ], + [ + "price", + "¥5/人/天" + ], + [ + "deploy", + "仅 SaaS" + ], + [ + "release", + "2 次" + ], + [ + "fix", + "1 天" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r3", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3" + ], + "cells": [ + [ + "vendor", + "NexusGrid" + ], + [ + "scope", + "虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel" + ], + [ + "price", + "¥12/人/天" + ], + [ + "deploy", + "私有化可选" + ], + [ + "release", + "7 次" + ], + [ + "fix", + "4 天" + ] + ] + } + ] + } + }, + { + "id": "n3", + "type": "steps", + "steps": { + "current": 0, + "steps": [ + { + "label": "Phase 0 准备（合同/SLA/环境）", + "status": "pending" + }, + { + "label": "Phase 1 VaultKeep 权限基座", + "status": "pending" + }, + { + "label": "Phase 2 NexusGrid 数据视图（并行）", + "status": "pending" + }, + { + "label": "Phase 3 LarkPipe 集成层", + "status": "pending" + }, + { + "label": "Phase 4 联调 UAT + 培训", + "status": "pending" + }, + { + "label": "Phase 5 分批上线 + 回滚预案", + "status": "pending" + } + ] + } + }, + { + "id": "n3a", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "### Phase 0 准备（建议 1–2 周）\n- 签订三方合同与 SLA：明确数据归属、退出条款与 API 抽象义务（应对锁定风险）。\n- 完成安全/合规评审：VaultKeep 国密适用边界、LarkPipe SaaS 数据出境评估。\n- 准备测试/预发/生产三套环境与统一账号体系。" + }, + { + "id": "n3b", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "### Phase 1 VaultKeep 权限基座（建议 3–4 周）\n- 设计「部门-角色-资源」三层角色矩阵，与现有 IAM 字段映射。\n- 临时令牌用于对外 API 网关；密钥轮换策略写入 CI。\n- 试点接入 1 个业务系统，验证角色继承与审批流后再扩大。" + }, + { + "id": "n3c", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "### Phase 2 NexusGrid 数据视图（建议 2–3 周，与 Phase 1 后半段并行）\n- 数据源接入与口径核对，确定单元格校验规则来源。\n- 涉及敏感字段时优先选私有化形态。\n- 性能基线：万级虚拟滚动、Excel 导出压测写入回归门禁。" + }, + { + "id": "n3d", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "### Phase 3 LarkPipe 集成层（建议 1–2 周）\n- 设计 Webhook 拓扑：VaultKeep 审计事件 + NexusGrid 异常告警 → LarkPipe → IM/工单。\n- 配置重试与幂等键，避免事件丢失或重复触发。\n- 模板变量集中登记，便于后续扩通道。" + }, + { + "id": "n3e", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "### Phase 4 联调 UAT + 培训（建议 1–2 周）\n- 端到端串联：权限变更 → 数据视图字段显隐 → 审计通知外发。\n- 针对「界面术语与现有系统不一致」组织术语对照培训，聚焦角色名与状态机。\n- 形成回滚手册与值班手册。" + }, + { + "id": "n3f", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "### Phase 5 分批上线（建议 2–3 周）\n- 按业务线灰度，每批不超过 20% 用户。\n- 监控指标：权限失败率、表格渲染 P95、Webhook 重试率。\n- 任一批失败立即回滚并复盘，再放下一批。" + }, + { + "id": "n4", + "type": "tree", + "tree": { + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "d-root", + "label": "实施依赖关系", + "children": [ + { + "id": "d-vk", + "label": "VaultKeep（前置基座）", + "tone": "info", + "badge": "阻塞", + "children": [ + { + "id": "d-vk-iam", + "label": "现有 IAM 字段映射完成", + "tone": "ok" + }, + { + "id": "d-vk-pilot", + "label": "试点业务系统接入通过", + "tone": "ok" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "d-ng", + "label": "NexusGrid（与基座后半段并行）", + "tone": "info", + "children": [ + { + "id": "d-ng-src", + "label": "数据源口径确认", + "tone": "ok" + }, + { + "id": "d-ng-perm", + "label": "字段显隐依赖 VaultKeep 角色映射", + "tone": "warn", + "badge": "依赖" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "d-lp", + "label": "LarkPipe（后置集成层）", + "tone": "info", + "badge": "依赖基座+视图", + "children": [ + { + "id": "d-lp-vk", + "label": "消费 VaultKeep 审计事件", + "tone": "warn" + }, + { + "id": "d-lp-ng", + "label": "消费 NexusGrid 异常告警", + "tone": "warn" + }, + { + "id": "d-lp-tpl", + "label": "模板变量统一登记", + "tone": "ok" + } + ] + } + ] + } + ] + } + }, + { + "id": "n5", + "type": "timeline", + "timeline": { + "items": [ + { + "title": "M0 合同与环境就绪", + "time": "W2", + "tone": "info", + "markdown": "三方合同签毕；三套环境与统一账号体系就绪，SLA 与退出条款敲定。" + }, + { + "title": "M1 权限基座试点通过", + "time": "W6", + "tone": "info", + "markdown": "VaultKeep 在 1 个业务系统验证角色矩阵 + 密钥轮换，IAM 字段映射打通。" + }, + { + "title": "M2 数据视图灰度", + "time": "W9", + "tone": "info", + "markdown": "NexusGrid 受控范围上线，单元格校验与导出回归通过，性能基线达标。" + }, + { + "title": "M3 集成层 UAT 通过", + "time": "W11", + "tone": "info", + "markdown": "VaultKeep 与 NexusGrid 事件稳定外发至 LarkPipe，重试 + 幂等验证通过。" + }, + { + "title": "M4 全量上线与回滚预案就绪", + "time": "W14", + "tone": "ok", + "markdown": "培训术语表、监控看板、回滚手册齐备；分批灰度完成，全量切换。" + } + ] + } + }, + { + "id": "n6", + "type": "kv", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo" + ], + "kv": [ + [ + "供应商锁定", + "中 · 私有 API 占比 40%" + ], + [ + "培训成本", + "低 · 界面术语与现有系统不一致" + ], + [ + "升级断层", + "中 · 近两季度仅小版本" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "n6a", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "### 风险应对建议（仅作规划参考）\n- **供应商锁定（中）**：合同阶段加入 API 抽象层与替代方案条款；关键功能保留 1 套兜底实现，避免被私有 API 绑死。\n- **培训成本（低）**：在 Phase 4 输出术语对照表 + 录屏，集中解决角色名、状态机两处不一致。\n- **升级断层（中）**：约定季度升级窗口，对小版本做自动化回归，避免一次跨多个小版本。" + }, + { + "id": "n7", + "type": "form", + "fields": [ + { + "key": "team_size", + "label": "实施团队规模（人）", + "type": "number", + "placeholder": "例如 8", + "required": true + }, + { + "key": "target_m4", + "label": "期望 M4 全量上线日期", + "type": "text", + "placeholder": "YYYY-MM-DD", + "required": true + }, + { + "key": "compliance", + "label": "合规与部署偏好", + "type": "select", + "options": [ + "国密 + 私有化", + "仅国密", + "仅私有化", + "两者都不要" + ], + "default": "国密 + 私有化" + }, + { + "key": "pilot_lines", + "label": "灰度业务线", + "type": "textarea", + "placeholder": "例如：财务、供应链", + "help": "每批不超过 20% 用户" + }, + { + "key": "notify_channel", + "label": "LarkPipe 主要落点", + "type": "select", + "options": [ + "企业 IM", + "工单系统", + "短信网关", + "邮件" + ], + "default": "企业 IM" + }, + { + "key": "rolling_back_owner", + "label": "回滚决策负责人", + "type": "text", + "placeholder": "例如：运维负责人 张三", + "required": true + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n8", + "type": "actions", + "actions": [ + { + "id": "export_pdf", + "label": "导出路线图 PDF", + "style": "primary" + }, + { + "id": "sync_pm", + "label": "同步到项目管理工具", + "style": "default" + }, + { + "id": "revise", + "label": "请求修订", + "style": "default" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n9", + "type": "doc-ref", + "docId": "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1" + }, + { + "id": "n10", + "type": "doc-ref", + "docId": "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2" + }, + { + "id": "n11", + "type": "doc-ref", + "docId": "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3" + }, + { + "id": "n12", + "type": "doc-ref", + "docId": "doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo" + } + ] + }, + "stats_final": { + "nodes": 19, + "maxDepth": 1, + "types": [ + "markdown", + "table", + "steps", + "markdown", + "markdown", + "markdown", + "markdown", + "markdown", + "markdown", + "tree", + "timeline", + "kv", + "markdown", + "form", + "actions", + "doc-ref", + "doc-ref", + "doc-ref", + "doc-ref" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo", + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3" + ], + "idsProvided": 19 + }, + "wall_s": 78.2 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-04.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-04.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..be21e4ec --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-04.json @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +{ + "task": "rc-04", + "family": "research-compare", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "risk", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 6875, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1092, + "completion_tokens": 5783, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 1091 + } + }, + "latency_s": 57.91 + }, + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 5855, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1141, + "completion_tokens": 4714, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 46.25 + } + ], + "callCount": 2, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"供应商引入风险分析 · 风控评审\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"评审摘要\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-04/riskmemo\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"基于内部尽调备忘与 3 份厂商材料整理。本次评审共识别 1 项高风险、1 项中风险、1 项低风险；以下按严重度组织，并标注每条事实的来源与我的判断。\"},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"type\":\"avatar\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-04/riskmemo\"],\"avatar\":{\"name\":\"高风险\",\"sub\":\"1 项 · 合规\",\"tone\":\"danger\"}},{\"id\":\"n1c\",\"type\":\"avatar\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-04/riskmemo\"],\"avatar\":{\"name\":\"中风险\",\"sub\":\"1 项 · 升级\",\"tone\":\"warn\"}},{\"id\":\"n1d\",\"type\":\"avatar\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-04/riskmemo\"],\"avatar\":{\"name\":\"低风险\",\"sub\":\"1 项 · 培训\",\"tone\":\"info\"}}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"tabs\",\"tabs\":{\"active\":\"tab-sev\",\"tabs\":[{\"id\":\"tab-sev\",\"label\":\"按严重度\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"高风险 · 合规缺口\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**事实**：尽调备忘指出「数据出境条款未覆盖」，评分为高。\\n\\n**我的判断**：三家厂商材料中均未披露数据驻留与出境路径，仅 VaultKeep 明确支持国密，但国密解决的是加密强度而非合规条款。建议在引入前必须以书面形式补齐数据出境/驻留/跨境回传条款，否则合规上线不可放行。\"},{\"id\":\"n3b\",\"type\":\"list\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-04/riskmemo\"],\"items\":[\"数据出境条款未覆盖（高）\"]},{\"id\":\"n3c\",\"type\":\"table\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-04/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-04/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-04/vendor3\"],\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"v\",\"label\":\"供应商\"},{\"key\":\"d\",\"label\":\"部署形态\"},{\"key\":\"p\",\"label\":\"报价\"},{\"key\":\"e\",\"label\":\"对高风险的暴露面\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"r1\",\"cells\":[[\"v\",\"NexusGrid\"],[\"d\",\"私有化可选\"],[\"p\",\"¥12/人/天\"],[\"e\",\"私有化部署可显著降低暴露；SaaS 模式下需补尽调\"]]},{\"id\":\"r2\",\"cells\":[[\"v\",\"LarkPipe\"],[\"d\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"p\",\"¥5/人/天\"],[\"e\",\"暴露面最大，需最严格尽调\"]]},{\"id\":\"r3\",\"cells\":[[\"v\",\"VaultKeep\"],[\"d\",\"国密支持\"],[\"p\",\"¥15/人/天\"],[\"e\",\"国密部分缓解，但合规条款仍需补\"]]}]}},{\"id\":\"n3d\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"ask-clause\",\"label\":\"要求补充数据出境/驻留条款\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"ask-audit\",\"label\":\"索取 SOC2 / ISO27001 报告\",\"style\":\"default\"},{\"id\":\"ask-dpa\",\"label\":\"要求签署 DPA 与补充协议\",\"style\":\"default\"}]}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"中风险 · 升级断层\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**事实**：尽调备忘指出「近两季度仅小版本」，评分为中。\\n\\n**我的判断**：以近半年发布频次看，VaultKeep 仅 4 次，最少，且同类工具多用于权限中枢，扩展滞后意味着关键安全特性可能延后；NexusGrid 9 次发布最高，但平均修复 5 天，存在补丁堆积风险；LarkPipe 修复仅 1 天，运维反应最快。建议将「升级节奏与路线图」写入 SLA，未达标触发退出条款。\"},{\"id\":\"n4b\",\"type\":\"list\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-04/riskmemo\"],\"items\":[\"近两季度仅小版本（中）\"]},{\"id\":\"n4c\",\"type\":\"table\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-04/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-04/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-04/vendor3\"],\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"v\",\"label\":\"供应商\"},{\"key\":\"r\",\"label\":\"近半年发布\"},{\"key\":\"f\",\"label\":\"平均修复周期\"},{\"key\":\"j\",\"label\":\"我的评级\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"r4\",\"cells\":[[\"v\",\"NexusGrid\"],[\"r\",\"9 次\"],[\"f\",\"5 天\"],[\"j\",\"活跃但修复偏慢\"]]},{\"id\":\"r5\",\"cells\":[[\"v\",\"LarkPipe\"],[\"r\",\"6 次\"],[\"f\",\"1 天\"],[\"j\",\"运维响应最佳\"]]},{\"id\":\"r6\",\"cells\":[[\"v\",\"VaultKeep\"],[\"r\",\"4 次\"],[\"f\",\"3 天\"],[\"j\",\"最薄弱，建议重点跟踪路线图\"]]}]}},{\"id\":\"n4d\",\"type\":\"timeline\",\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"季度版本评审会\",\"time\":\"每季度\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"markdown\":\"由采购与安全联合对齐厂商近 3 个月发布与小版本累积\"},{\"title\":\"路线图对账\",\"time\":\"签约后 30 天\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"markdown\":\"要求厂商提供未来 6 个月特性与安全更新计划\"},{\"title\":\"SLA 触发评估\",\"time\":\"任一季度\",\"tone\":\"danger\",\"markdown\":\"如近 6 个月无中版本更新，触发退出条款复评\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"低风险 · 培训成本\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n5a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**事实**：尽调备忘指出「界面术语与现有系统不一致」，评为低。\\n\\n**我的判断**：风险虽低，但在引入初期会拉高客服工单量，影响用户体验。建议要求厂商提供术语对照表与一键切换方案，并安排 2 小时的内部培训即可显著缓解，预算约可忽略。\"},{\"id\":\"n5b\",\"type\":\"list\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-04/riskmemo\"],\"items\":[\"界面术语与现有系统不一致（低）\"]},{\"id\":\"n5c\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"ask-term\",\"label\":\"要求厂商提供术语对照表\",\"style\":\"default\"},{\"id\":\"ask-train\",\"label\":\"安排 2 小时内部培训\",\"style\":\"default\"}]}]}]},{\"id\":\"tab-vendor\",\"label\":\"按供应商\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n6\",\"type\":\"compare\",\"compare\":{\"left\":{\"title\":\"LarkPipe（消息管道）\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n6a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-04/vendor2\"],\"kv\":[[\"上线\",\"2019-03\"],[\"类别\",\"消息管道\"],[\"部署\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"报价\",\"¥5/人/天\"],[\"近半年发布\",\"6 次\"],[\"平均修复\",\"1 天\"]]},{\"id\":\"n6b\",\"type\":\"list\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-04/vendor2\"],\"items\":[\"Webhook 路由\",\"重试策略\",\"模板变量\"]}]},\"right\":{\"title\":\"VaultKeep（权限中枢）\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n6c\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-04/vendor3\"],\"kv\":[[\"上线\",\"2022-08\"],[\"类别\",\"权限中枢\"],[\"部署\",\"国密支持\"],[\"报价\",\"¥15/人/天\"],[\"近半年发布\",\"4 次\"],[\"平均修复\",\"3 天\"]]},{\"id\":\"n6d\",\"type\":\"list\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-04/vendor3\"],\"items\":[\"RBAC\",\"临时令牌\",\"密钥轮换\"]}]}}},{\"id\":\"n7\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"NexusGrid（数据表格）\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n7a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-04/vendor1\"],\"kv\":[[\"上线\",\"2021-11\"],[\"类别\",\"数据表格\"],[\"部署\",\"私有化可选\"],[\"报价\",\"¥12/人/天\"],[\"近半年发布\",\"9 次\"],[\"平均修复\",\"5 天\"]]},{\"id\":\"n7b\",\"type\":\"list\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-04/vendor1\"],\"items\":[\"虚拟滚动\",\"单元格校验\",\"导出 Excel\"]}]}]}]}},{\"id\":\"n8\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"我的综合判断\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n8a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"综合三份厂商材料与尽调备忘，我倾向如下结论：\\n\\n- **高风险优先于功能**：在合规条款未补齐前，任何一家都不建议放行；其中 NexusGrid 因支持私有化，可作为优先候选，要求以私有化形态上线。\\n- **LarkPipe** 运维响应最佳但合规暴露最大，建议先作为内部试点（仅非敏感数据）。\\n- **VaultKeep** 国密是其差异化优势，但升级节奏最慢，建议作为长期选项进入二轮评审，并要求厂商提供路线图承诺。\\n- **低风险项** 通过培训与术语对照即可缓解，不构成否决项。\"}},{\"id\":\"n9\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"steps\":{\"current\":0,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"完成补充尽调\",\"status\":\"active\"},{\"label\":\"法务与安全会签\",\"status\":\"pending\"},{\"label\":\"试点上线\",\"status\":\"pending\"},{\"label\":\"全量推广\",\"status\":\"pending\"}]}},{\"id\":\"n10\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"act-approve\",\"label\":\"通过（附条件）\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"act-supplement\",\"label\":\"退回补充尽调\",\"style\":\"default\"},{\"id\":\"act-reject\",\"label\":\"终止本次引入\",\"style\":\"danger\"}]}}]}", + "valid_first": false, + "errors_first": [ + "JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 4912 (char 4911)" + ], + "stats_first": null, + "raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"风控评审 · 风险分析\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"title\":\"风险概览\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-04/riskmemo\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"kv\":[[\"高风险\",\"1 条 · 合规缺口\"],[\"中风险\",\"1 条 · 升级断层\"],[\"低风险\",\"1 条 · 培训成本\"],[\"已审厂商\",\"NexusGrid / LarkPipe / VaultKeep\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"title\":\"候选厂商对照\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"v\",\"label\":\"厂商\"},{\"key\":\"c\",\"label\":\"类别\"},{\"key\":\"p\",\"label\":\"报价\"},{\"key\":\"d\",\"label\":\"部署形态\"},{\"key\":\"r\",\"label\":\"近半年发布\"},{\"key\":\"f\",\"label\":\"平均修复\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"r1\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-04/vendor1\"],\"cells\":[[\"v\",\"NexusGrid\"],[\"c\",\"数据表格\"],[\"p\",\"¥12/人/天\"],[\"d\",\"私有化可选\"],[\"r\",\"9 次\"],[\"f\",\"5 天\"]]},{\"id\":\"r2\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-04/vendor2\"],\"cells\":[[\"v\",\"LarkPipe\"],[\"c\",\"消息管道\"],[\"p\",\"¥5/人/天\"],[\"d\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"r\",\"6 次\"],[\"f\",\"1 天\"]]},{\"id\":\"r3\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-04/vendor3\"],\"cells\":[[\"v\",\"VaultKeep\"],[\"c\",\"权限中枢\"],[\"p\",\"¥15/人/天\"],[\"d\",\"国密支持\"],[\"r\",\"4 次\"],[\"f\",\"3 天\"]]}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"title\":\"风险（按严重度）\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3high\",\"title\":\"高 · 合规缺口\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-04/riskmemo\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3h1\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-04/riskmemo\"],\"markdown\":\"**事实**：数据出境条款未覆盖。\\n\\n**来源**：尽调风险备忘，标注为高。\"},{\"id\":\"n3h2\",\"markdown\":\"**我的判断**：这是硬性合规约束，任何入选厂商必须在合同中补充数据出境与本地化承诺，否则直接一票否决。建议把该项作为采购清单的前置门槛，不达标不予入围。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n3mid\",\"title\":\"中 · 升级断层\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-04/riskmemo\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3m1\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-04/riskmemo\"],\"markdown\":\"**事实**：近两季度仅小版本，缺少大版本升级。\\n\\n**来源**：尽调风险备忘，标注为中。\"},{\"id\":\"n3m2\",\"markdown\":\"**我的判断**：长期看可能影响功能覆盖与生态兼容。建议要求厂商提供未来 6-12 个月的产品路线图作为佐证；无法提供者降权处理，但不必直接否决。可在合同中加入里程碑条款兜底。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n3low\",\"title\":\"低 · 培训成本\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-04/riskmemo\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3l1\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-04/riskmemo\"],\"markdown\":\"**事实**：界面术语与现有系统不一致。\\n\\n**来源**：尽调风险备忘，标注为低。\"},{\"id\":\"n3l2\",\"markdown\":\"**我的判断**：可在落地阶段用术语对照表加简短培训缓释，影响有限。建议在交付物清单中追加一份内部术语对照手册，作为上线前的标准动作。\"}]}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"title\":\"下一步建议\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"markdown\":\"**综合建议（我的判断，未引用材料）**：\\n1. **合规先行**：以数据出境条款为入围前提，未补签者直接否决。\\n2. **横向组合**：在合规通过的前提下，NexusGrid 提供私有化可选的部署灵活度，LarkPipe 修复周期最短（1 天）适合作为运营保障组合，VaultKeep 国密支持适合权限敏感场景，按需搭配。\\n3. **缓释措施**：要求厂商提交未来 6-12 个月路线图应对中风险；交付时附带术语对照手册应对低风险。\"},{\"id\":\"n4b\",\"markdown\":\"**评审请决策项**：是否将『数据出境条款补签』设为本次选型的前置否决条件？建议是，但需在会上确认。\"}]}]}", + "repaired": true, + "valid_final": false, + "errors_final": [ + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None" + ], + "spec": null, + "wall_s": 104.2 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-05.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-05.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..4d602afa --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-05.json @@ -0,0 +1,315 @@ +{ + "task": "rc-05", + "family": "research-compare", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "order", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 9338, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1089, + "completion_tokens": 8249, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 1088 + } + }, + "latency_s": 80.78 + }, + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 10288, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1138, + "completion_tokens": 9150, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 0 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 66.9 + } + ], + "callCount": 2, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"评审后实施顺序规划\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"结论与建议\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"综合三家厂商在能力、价格、部署形态、迭代节奏上的差异，以及尽调阶段识别的合规、性能与锁定风险，建议按 **三阶段** 渐进推进：先固化**合规底座**（SSO/审计/数据境内），再以**性能验证**为门槛引入数据场景，最后以**抽象层**贯穿全流程，避免直接持有 40% 私有 API。LarkPipe 适合作为低风险试点；NexusGrid 需先做万行基准；FlowSync 适合作为上层编排。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"厂商评估摘要\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"source\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-05/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-05/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-05/vendor3\"],\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"dim\",\"label\":\"维度\"},{\"key\":\"fs\",\"label\":\"FlowSync\"},{\"key\":\"ng\",\"label\":\"NexusGrid\"},{\"key\":\"lp\",\"label\":\"LarkPipe\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"r-cat\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"类别\"],[\"fs\",\"流程编排\"],[\"ng\",\"数据表格\"],[\"lp\",\"消息管道\"]]},{\"id\":\"r-online\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"上线时间\"],[\"fs\",\"2023-05\"],[\"ng\",\"2021-11\"],[\"lp\",\"2019-03\"]]},{\"id\":\"r-cap\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"核心能力\"],[\"fs\",\"拖拽画布 / 审批链 / REST 连接器\"],[\"ng\",\"虚拟滚动 / 单元格校验 / 导出 Excel\"],[\"lp\",\"Webhook 路由 / 重试策略 / 模板变量\"]]},{\"id\":\"r-price\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"报价\"],[\"fs\",\"¥8/人/天\"],[\"ng\",\"¥12/人/天\"],[\"lp\",\"¥5/人/天\"]]},{\"id\":\"r-deploy\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"部署形态\"],[\"fs\",\"SSO, 审计日志\"],[\"ng\",\"私有化可选\"],[\"lp\",\"仅 SaaS\"]]},{\"id\":\"r-rel\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"近半年发布\"],[\"fs\",\"5 次（修复 ~3 天）\"],[\"ng\",\"5 次（修复 ~3 天）\"],[\"lp\",\"3 次（修复 ~2 天）\"]]}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"尽调风险约束\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"list\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-05/riskmemo\"],\"items\":[\"高 · 合规缺口：数据出境条款未覆盖\",\"高 · 性能未验证：万行表格场景无官方基准\",\"中 · 供应商锁定：私有 API 占比 40%\"]},{\"id\":\"n3b\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"以上约束直接决定实施顺序：**合规先于性能、性能先于规模、抽象层贯穿始终**。任一阶段未达准入门槛则启动回退预案或暂缓推进。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"分阶段实施计划\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"tabs\",\"tabs\":{\"tabs\":[{\"id\":\"p1\",\"label\":\"Phase 1 · 合规与试点（W1–W3）\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"p1-step\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"steps\":{\"current\":0,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"合同补签数据境内 / 出境条款\",\"status\":\"active\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"label\":\"SSO 与审计日志接入（以 FlowSync 为入口）\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"info\"},{\"label\":\"LarkPipe 沙箱试点（仅非敏感数据）\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"info\"}]}},{\"id\":\"p1-dep\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**依赖**：法务条款模板到位（外部）；IdP 容量与目录同步评估完成；LarkPipe 沙箱账号。\\n**准入门槛**：数据出境条款已签 + SSO 可用。否则 Phase 2 不启动。\"}]},{\"id\":\"p2\",\"label\":\"Phase 2 · 性能与场景验证（W4–W7）\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"p2-step\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"steps\":{\"current\":0,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"NexusGrid 万行表格基准测试（内部）\",\"status\":\"active\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"label\":\"确定私有化部署形态与数据流路径\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"info\"},{\"label\":\"抽象层 / 适配器 RFC 评审（防 40% 私有 API 锁定）\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"info\"}]}},{\"id\":\"p2-dep\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**依赖**：Phase 1 准入完成；内部性能测试环境就绪；厂商提供完整 API 文档（含私有部分）。\\n**准入门槛**：万行 P95 ≤ 目标值；抽象层 RFC 通过评审。\"}]},{\"id\":\"p3\",\"label\":\"Phase 3 · 灰度与全量（W8–W14）\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"p3-step\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"steps\":{\"current\":0,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"10% 流量灰度（FlowSync 编排 + NexusGrid 数据 + LarkPipe 通知）\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"info\"},{\"label\":\"50% → 100% 分批放量\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"info\"},{\"label\":\"回退预案演练与项目复盘\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"info\"}]}},{\"id\":\"p3-dep\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**依赖**：Phase 2 准入达成；回退开关与数据导出备用通道就绪。\\n**准入门槛**：灰度连续 7 日无 P0/P1 事故、关键 SLO 达标。\"}}],\"active\":\"p1\"}},{\"id\":\"n4b\",\"type\":\"timeline\",\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"M1 · 合同与合规条款落地\",\"time\":\"W3\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"markdown\":\"数据境内 / 出境条款签订 + SSO + 审计日志可用\"},{\"title\":\"M2 · 性能准入门槛达成\",\"time\":\"W7\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"markdown\":\"万行表格 P95 通过 + 抽象层 RFC 通过\"},{\"title\":\"M3 · 灰度启动\",\"time\":\"W9\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"markdown\":\"10% 流量切换，三厂商链路联调\"},{\"title\":\"M4 · 全量上线\",\"time\":\"W13\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"markdown\":\"灰度连续 7 日无 P0/P1\"},{\"title\":\"M5 · 复盘与锁定评估\",\"time\":\"W14\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"markdown\":\"私有 API 占比复核、续约与替换成本估算\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"实施参数收集\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n5a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"请填写以下参数以校准阶段时长、回退阈值与优先级，确认后即可提交评审。\"},{\"id\":\"n5b\",\"type\":\"form\",\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"team_size\",\"label\":\"实施团队规模（人）\",\"type\":\"number\",\"required\":true,\"placeholder\":\"例如 6\",\"help\":\"用于估算 Phase 2 并发任务上限\"},{\"key\":\"p95_target_ms\",\"label\":\"万行表格 P95 目标（ms）\",\"type\":\"number\",\"required\":true,\"default\":1500,\"help\":\"Phase 2 准入门槛\"},{\"key\":\"data_sensitivity\",\"label\":\"数据敏感度等级\",\"type\":\"select\",\"required\":true,\"options\":[\"低（可出境）\",\"中（境内+脱敏）\",\"高（强境内+审计）\"]},{\"key\":\"lockin_tolerance\",\"label\":\"私有 API 锁定容忍度\",\"type\":\"select\",\"required\":true,\"options\":[\"<20%\",\"20–40%\",\"需抽象层兜底\",\"强制解耦\"],\"default\":\"需抽象层兜底\"},{\"key\":\"priority_phase\",\"label\":\"优先进入的阶段\",\"type\":\"select\",\"required\":true,\"options\":[\"Phase 1 合规与试点\",\"Phase 2 性能与场景验证\",\"Phase 3 灰度与全量\"],\"default\":\"Phase 1 合规与试点\"},{\"key\":\"go_no_go\",\"label\":\"是否同意进入 Phase 2\",\"type\":\"boolean\",\"required\":true,\"default\":false}]}]},{\"id\":\"n6\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"评审与下一步\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n6a\",\"type\":\"doc-ref\",\"docId\":\"doc:eval/rc-05/riskmemo\"},{\"id\":\"n6b\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"submit\",\"label\":\"提交实施计划\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"save\",\"label\":\"保存草稿\",\"style\":\"default\"},{\"id\":\"abandon\",\"label\":\"暂缓上线\",\"style\":\"danger\"}]}}]}]}", + "valid_first": false, + "errors_first": [ + "JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 3054 (char 3053)" + ], + "stats_first": null, + "raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"评审后实施规划\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"规划目标\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"基于三方工具评估材料与尽调风险备忘，输出一份可执行的实施顺序，覆盖阶段、依赖与里程碑。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"候选方案横向对比\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"table\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-05/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-05/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-05/vendor3\"],\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"tool\",\"label\":\"工具\"},{\"key\":\"cat\",\"label\":\"类别\"},{\"key\":\"online\",\"label\":\"上线时间\"},{\"key\":\"price\",\"label\":\"报价\"},{\"key\":\"deploy\",\"label\":\"部署形态\"},{\"key\":\"release\",\"label\":\"半年发布\"},{\"key\":\"fix\",\"label\":\"修复周期\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"r1\",\"cells\":[[\"tool\",\"FlowSync\"],[\"cat\",\"流程编排\"],[\"online\",\"2023-05\"],[\"price\",\"¥8/人/天\"],[\"deploy\",\"SSO/审计日志\"],[\"release\",\"5 次\"],[\"fix\",\"3 天\"]]},{\"id\":\"r2\",\"cells\":[[\"tool\",\"NexusGrid\"],[\"cat\",\"数据表格\"],[\"online\",\"2021-11\"],[\"price\",\"¥12/人/天\"],[\"deploy\",\"私有化可选\"],[\"release\",\"5 次\"],[\"fix\",\"3 天\"]]},{\"id\":\"r3\",\"cells\":[[\"tool\",\"LarkPipe\"],[\"cat\",\"消息管道\"],[\"online\",\"2019-03\"],[\"price\",\"¥5/人/天\"],[\"deploy\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"release\",\"3 次\"],[\"fix\",\"2 天\"]]}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"尽调风险概览\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"tree\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-05/riskmemo\"],\"tree\":{\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"rk1\",\"label\":\"合规缺口：数据出境条款未覆盖\",\"tone\":\"danger\",\"badge\":\"高\"},{\"id\":\"rk2\",\"label\":\"供应商锁定：私有 API 占比 40%\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"badge\":\"中\"},{\"id\":\"rk3\",\"label\":\"性能未验证：万行表格无基准\",\"tone\":\"danger\",\"badge\":\"高\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"实施顺序建议\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"## 阶段划分\\n\\n**阶段一（T+0 至 T+2 周）·合规与基线**\\n- 法务评审，补签数据出境条款，关闭高级合规缺口\\n- 同步梳理私有 API 清单（占比 40%），约定退出与数据导出方案\\n- 依赖：法务资源、合同模板；里程碑：合规签约完成\\n\\n**阶段二（T+2 至 T+4 周）·低成本快速验证**\\n- 优先上线 LarkPipe 消息通道（¥5/人/天，2019-03 上线，迭代稳健）\\n- 在沙箱环境完成 Webhook 与模板变量端到端联调\\n- 依赖：阶段一完成；里程碑：消息链路跑通\\n\\n**阶段三（T+4 至 T+7 周）·核心场景验证**\\n- NexusGrid 万行表格压测，产出基准报告，关闭高级性能风险\\n- 期间保持 LarkPipe 在生产持续观察（半年 3 次发布、修复周期 2 天）\\n- 依赖：阶段二；里程碑：性能基线报告\\n\\n**阶段四（T+7 至 T+10 周）·编排与上线**\\n- 引入 FlowSync（¥8/人/天）做审批编排，结合审计日志与 SSO\\n- 试点部门灰度，随后全量切换\\n- 依赖：阶段三；里程碑：流程编排上线、首批培训完成\\n\\n## 关键依赖汇总\\n1. 合规签约 → 阻断所有后续上线动作\\n2. 性能基线 → 阻断数据表格全量切换\\n3. 私有 API 退出方案 → 阻断长期合同续签\\n\\n## 选型倾向\\n综合报价、迭代频次与风险敞口，建议：消息走 LarkPipe、数据走 NexusGrid、编排走 FlowSync，并在签约前对 40% 私有 API 与数据出境条款做硬性约束。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"原始材料引用\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n5a\",\"type\":\"doc-ref\",\"docId\":\"doc:eval/rc-05/vendor1\"},{\"id\":\"n5b\",\"type\":\"doc-ref\",\"docId\":\"doc:eval/rc-05/vendor2\"},{\"id\":\"n5c\",\"type\":\"doc-ref\",\"docId\":\"doc:eval/rc-05/vendor3\"},{\"id\":\"n5d\",\"type\":\"doc-ref\",\"docId\":\"doc:eval/rc-05/riskmemo\"}]}]}", + "repaired": true, + "valid_final": true, + "errors_final": [], + "spec": { + "title": "评审后实施规划", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n1", + "type": "section", + "title": "规划目标", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n1a", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "基于三方工具评估材料与尽调风险备忘，输出一份可执行的实施顺序，覆盖阶段、依赖与里程碑。" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n2", + "type": "section", + "title": "候选方案横向对比", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n2a", + "type": "table", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-05/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-05/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-05/vendor3" + ], + "table": { + "columns": [ + { + "key": "tool", + "label": "工具" + }, + { + "key": "cat", + "label": "类别" + }, + { + "key": "online", + "label": "上线时间" + }, + { + "key": "price", + "label": "报价" + }, + { + "key": "deploy", + "label": "部署形态" + }, + { + "key": "release", + "label": "半年发布" + }, + { + "key": "fix", + "label": "修复周期" + } + ], + "rows": [ + { + "id": "r1", + "cells": [ + [ + "tool", + "FlowSync" + ], + [ + "cat", + "流程编排" + ], + [ + "online", + "2023-05" + ], + [ + "price", + "¥8/人/天" + ], + [ + "deploy", + "SSO/审计日志" + ], + [ + "release", + "5 次" + ], + [ + "fix", + "3 天" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r2", + "cells": [ + [ + "tool", + "NexusGrid" + ], + [ + "cat", + "数据表格" + ], + [ + "online", + "2021-11" + ], + [ + "price", + "¥12/人/天" + ], + [ + "deploy", + "私有化可选" + ], + [ + "release", + "5 次" + ], + [ + "fix", + "3 天" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r3", + "cells": [ + [ + "tool", + "LarkPipe" + ], + [ + "cat", + "消息管道" + ], + [ + "online", + "2019-03" + ], + [ + "price", + "¥5/人/天" + ], + [ + "deploy", + "仅 SaaS" + ], + [ + "release", + "3 次" + ], + [ + "fix", + "2 天" + ] + ] + } + ] + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n3", + "type": "section", + "title": "尽调风险概览", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n3a", + "type": "tree", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-05/riskmemo" + ], + "tree": { + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "rk1", + "label": "合规缺口：数据出境条款未覆盖", + "tone": "danger", + "badge": "高" + }, + { + "id": "rk2", + "label": "供应商锁定：私有 API 占比 40%", + "tone": "warn", + "badge": "中" + }, + { + "id": "rk3", + "label": "性能未验证：万行表格无基准", + "tone": "danger", + "badge": "高" + } + ] + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n4", + "type": "section", + "title": "实施顺序建议", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n4a", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "## 阶段划分\n\n**阶段一（T+0 至 T+2 周）·合规与基线**\n- 法务评审，补签数据出境条款，关闭高级合规缺口\n- 同步梳理私有 API 清单（占比 40%），约定退出与数据导出方案\n- 依赖：法务资源、合同模板；里程碑：合规签约完成\n\n**阶段二（T+2 至 T+4 周）·低成本快速验证**\n- 优先上线 LarkPipe 消息通道（¥5/人/天，2019-03 上线，迭代稳健）\n- 在沙箱环境完成 Webhook 与模板变量端到端联调\n- 依赖：阶段一完成；里程碑：消息链路跑通\n\n**阶段三（T+4 至 T+7 周）·核心场景验证**\n- NexusGrid 万行表格压测，产出基准报告，关闭高级性能风险\n- 期间保持 LarkPipe 在生产持续观察（半年 3 次发布、修复周期 2 天）\n- 依赖：阶段二；里程碑：性能基线报告\n\n**阶段四（T+7 至 T+10 周）·编排与上线**\n- 引入 FlowSync（¥8/人/天）做审批编排，结合审计日志与 SSO\n- 试点部门灰度，随后全量切换\n- 依赖：阶段三；里程碑：流程编排上线、首批培训完成\n\n## 关键依赖汇总\n1. 合规签约 → 阻断所有后续上线动作\n2. 性能基线 → 阻断数据表格全量切换\n3. 私有 API 退出方案 → 阻断长期合同续签\n\n## 选型倾向\n综合报价、迭代频次与风险敞口，建议：消息走 LarkPipe、数据走 NexusGrid、编排走 FlowSync，并在签约前对 40% 私有 API 与数据出境条款做硬性约束。" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n5", + "type": "section", + "title": "原始材料引用", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n5a", + "type": "doc-ref", + "docId": "doc:eval/rc-05/vendor1" + }, + { + "id": "n5b", + "type": "doc-ref", + "docId": "doc:eval/rc-05/vendor2" + }, + { + "id": "n5c", + "type": "doc-ref", + "docId": "doc:eval/rc-05/vendor3" + }, + { + "id": "n5d", + "type": "doc-ref", + "docId": "doc:eval/rc-05/riskmemo" + } + ] + } + ] + }, + "stats_final": { + "nodes": 13, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "markdown", + "section", + "table", + "section", + "tree", + "section", + "markdown", + "section", + "doc-ref", + "doc-ref", + "doc-ref", + "doc-ref" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "doc:eval/rc-05/riskmemo", + "doc:eval/rc-05/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-05/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-05/vendor3" + ], + "idsProvided": 13 + }, + "wall_s": 147.7 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-06.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-06.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..dd7766c7 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-06.json @@ -0,0 +1,467 @@ +{ + "task": "rc-06", + "family": "research-compare", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "compare", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 5107, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1091, + "completion_tokens": 4016, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 0 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 768 + } + }, + "latency_s": 32.2 + }, + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 5205, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1140, + "completion_tokens": 4065, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 35.0 + } + ], + "callCount": 2, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"工具选型对比：LarkPipe / EchoDocs / NexusGrid\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"核心对比\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"本页聚焦三家的核心能力、价格与部署形态差异，并附尽调风险与选型建议，供决策会使用。\"},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"type\":\"table\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-06/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-06/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-06/vendor3\"],\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"dim\",\"label\":\"维度\"},{\"key\":\"v1\",\"label\":\"LarkPipe\"},{\"key\":\"v2\",\"label\":\"EchoDocs\"},{\"key\":\"v3\",\"label\":\"NexusGrid\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"r1\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"类别\"],[\"v1\",\"消息管道\"],[\"v2\",\"文档协同\"],[\"v3\",\"数据表格\"]]},{\"id\":\"r2\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"上线时间\"],[\"v1\",\"2019-03\"],[\"v2\",\"2020-06\"],[\"v3\",\"2021-11\"]]},{\"id\":\"r3\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"核心能力\"],[\"v1\",\"Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量\"],[\"v2\",\"批注、版本链、全文检索\"],[\"v3\",\"虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel\"]]},{\"id\":\"r4\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"报价\"],[\"v1\",\"¥5/人/天\"],[\"v2\",\"¥9/人/天\"],[\"v3\",\"¥12/人/天\"]]},{\"id\":\"r5\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"部署形态\"],[\"v1\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"v2\",\"无离线\"],[\"v3\",\"私有化可选\"]]},{\"id\":\"r6\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"近半年发布\"],[\"v1\",\"6 次\"],[\"v2\",\"9 次\"],[\"v3\",\"5 次\"]]},{\"id\":\"r7\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"平均修复周期\"],[\"v1\",\"3 天\"],[\"v2\",\"2 天\"],[\"v3\",\"1 天\"]]}]}},{\"id\":\"n1c\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**差异要点**：\\n- **价格**：NexusGrid 最贵（¥12），LarkPipe 最便宜（¥5），相差 2.4 倍。\\n- **部署**：仅 NexusGrid 支持私有化；LarkPipe 仅 SaaS，EchoDocs 无离线能力。\\n- **响应速度**：NexusGrid 修复周期最短（1 天），LarkPipe 最长（3 天）。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"厂商详情\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"tabs\",\"tabs\":{\"active\":0,\"tabs\":[{\"id\":\"t1\",\"label\":\"LarkPipe\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"t1a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-06/vendor1\"],\"kv\":[[\"类别\",\"消息管道\"],[\"上线时间\",\"2019-03\"],[\"核心能力\",\"Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量\"],[\"报价\",\"¥5/人/天\"],[\"部署形态\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"近半年发布\",\"6 次\"],[\"平均修复周期\",\"3 天\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"t2\",\"label\":\"EchoDocs\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"t2a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-06/vendor2\"],\"kv\":[[\"类别\",\"文档协同\"],[\"上线时间\",\"2020-06\"],[\"核心能力\",\"批注、版本链、全文检索\"],[\"报价\",\"¥9/人/天\"],[\"部署形态\",\"无离线\"],[\"近半年发布\",\"9 次\"],[\"平均修复周期\",\"2 天\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"t3\",\"label\":\"NexusGrid\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"t3a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-06/vendor3\"],\"kv\":[[\"类别\",\"数据表格\"],[\"上线时间\",\"2021-11\"],[\"核心能力\",\"虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel\"],[\"报价\",\"¥12/人/天\"],[\"部署形态\",\"私有化可选\"],[\"近半年发布\",\"5 次\"],[\"平均修复周期\",\"1 天\"]]]}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"尽调风险\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-06/riskmemo\"],\"markdown\":\"- **性能未验证（高）**：万行表格场景无官方基准，需先做 PoC 压测。\\n- **供应商锁定（中）**：私有 API 占比 40%，迁移成本不可忽略。\\n- **培训成本（低）**：界面术语与现有系统不一致，需少量培训投入。\"},{\"id\":\"n3b\",\"type\":\"progress\",\"progress\":{\"label\":\"性能未验证（高）\",\"value\":0.8}},{\"id\":\"n3c\",\"type\":\"progress\",\"progress\":{\"label\":\"供应商锁定（中）\",\"value\":0.5}},{\"id\":\"n3d\",\"type\":\"progress\",\"progress\":{\"label\":\"培训成本（低）\",\"value\":0.2}}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"建议与理由\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**首推 NexusGrid**，理由如下：\\n\\n1. **部署最灵活**：唯一支持私有化部署，满足合规与离线诉求，可直接对冲\\\"供应商锁定\\\"风险。\\n2. **运维最稳**：平均修复周期 1 天，三家中最短；近半年 5 次发布节奏平稳。\\n3. **场景契合**：数据表格类工具与\\\"万行表格\\\"诉求天然匹配，虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel 覆盖完整链路。\\n\\n**需在签约前补齐的事项**：\\n- 价格最高（¥12/人/天），按 100 人测算年化约 ¥43.8 万，建议谈判阶梯折扣或锁定多年价。\\n- 上线时间最短（2021-11），成熟度弱于另两家，要求厂商提供近半年 5 次发布的更新清单与客户案例作为稳定性证据。\\n- 风险备忘中\\\"性能未验证（高）\\\"需先闭环——**建议先做 2 周 PoC**，覆盖万行压测、私有化部署演练与 API 兼容性验证，未达标即启动备选。\\n\\n**备选方案**：若 PoC 不达标，回退至 LarkPipe（¥5/人/天、仅 SaaS、部署最快），其 Webhook 路由与重试策略可与现有消息管道体系无缝衔接，长期再评估是否替换。\"}]}}]}", + "valid_first": false, + "errors_first": [ + "JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 2110 (char 2109)" + ], + "stats_first": null, + "raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"选型对比：LarkPipe / EchoDocs / NexusGrid\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"概览\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-06/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-06/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-06/vendor3\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"tabs\",\"tabs\":{\"tabs\":[{\"id\":\"t1\",\"label\":\"LarkPipe\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1a1\",\"type\":\"avatar\",\"avatar\":{\"name\":\"LarkPipe\",\"sub\":\"消息管道 · 2019-03\",\"tone\":\"info\"},\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-06/vendor1\"]},{\"id\":\"n1a2\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"核心能力\",\"Webhook 路由 / 重试策略 / 模板变量\"],[\"报价\",\"¥5 / 人 / 天\"],[\"部署形态\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"发布节奏\",\"近半年 6 次\"],[\"平均修复周期\",\"3 天\"]],\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-06/vendor1\"]}]},{\"id\":\"t2\",\"label\":\"EchoDocs\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1b1\",\"type\":\"avatar\",\"avatar\":{\"name\":\"EchoDocs\",\"sub\":\"文档协同 · 2020-06\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-06/vendor2\"]},{\"id\":\"n1b2\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"核心能力\",\"批注 / 版本链 / 全文检索\"],[\"报价\",\"¥9 / 人 / 天\"],[\"部署形态\",\"无离线\"],[\"发布节奏\",\"近半年 9 次\"],[\"平均修复周期\",\"2 天\"]],\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-06/vendor2\"]}]},{\"id\":\"t3\",\"label\":\"NexusGrid\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1c1\",\"type\":\"avatar\",\"avatar\":{\"name\":\"NexusGrid\",\"sub\":\"数据表格 · 2021-11\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-06/vendor3\"]},{\"id\":\"n1c2\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"核心能力\",\"虚拟滚动 / 单元格校验 / 导出 Excel\"],[\"报价\",\"¥12 / 人 / 天\"],[\"部署形态\",\"私有化可选\"],[\"发布节奏\",\"近半年 5 次\"],[\"平均修复周期\",\"1 天\"]],\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-06/vendor3\"]}]}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"关键差异横向对比\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-06/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-06/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-06/vendor3\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"table\",\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"dim\",\"label\":\"维度\"},{\"key\":\"v1\",\"label\":\"LarkPipe\"},{\"key\":\"v2\",\"label\":\"EchoDocs\"},{\"key\":\"v3\",\"label\":\"NexusGrid\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"r1\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"类别 / 上线时间\"],[\"v1\",\"消息管道 · 2019-03\"],[\"v2\",\"文档协同 · 2020-06\"],[\"v3\",\"数据表格 · 2021-11\"]]},{\"id\":\"r2\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"核心能力\"],[\"v1\",\"Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量\"],[\"v2\",\"批注、版本链、全文检索\"],[\"v3\",\"虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel\"]]},{\"id\":\"r3\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"报价\"],[\"v1\",\"¥5 / 人 / 天\"],[\"v2\",\"¥9 / 人 / 天\"],[\"v3\",\"¥12 / 人 / 天\"]]},{\"id\":\"r4\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"部署形态\"],[\"v1\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"v2\",\"无离线（仅在线）\"],[\"v3\",\"私有化可选\"]]},{\"id\":\"r5\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"发布节奏（近半年）\"],[\"v1\",\"6 次\"],[\"v2\",\"9 次\"],[\"v3\",\"5 次\"]]},{\"id\":\"r6\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"平均修复周期\"],[\"v1\",\"3 天\"],[\"v2\",\"2 天\"],[\"v3\",\"1 天\"]]}]},\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-06/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-06/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-06/vendor3\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"尽调风险备忘\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-06/riskmemo\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"progress\",\"progress\":{\"label\":\"供应商锁定（中）：私有 API 占比 40%\",\"value\":0.5},\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-06/riskmemo\"]},{\"id\":\"n3b\",\"type\":\"progress\",\"progress\":{\"label\":\"性能未验证（高）：万行表格场景无官方基准\",\"value\":0.85},\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-06/riskmemo\"]},{\"id\":\"n3c\",\"type\":\"progress\",\"progress\":{\"label\":\"培训成本（低）：界面术语与现有系统不一致\",\"value\":0.25},\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-06/riskmemo\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"建议与结论\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**综合结论：按场景分层组合选用，不建议单点采购一家覆盖全部需求。**\\n\\n- **若核心痛点是流程消息触发的稳定性**，优先 LarkPipe：报价最低、修复周期稳定，Webhook + 重试 + 模板能力直接覆盖主链路；代价是仅 SaaS，需接受公网依赖与合规约束。\\n- **若需要文档沉淀与多人协作**，选 EchoDocs：迭代最快、修复 2 天，全文检索对回溯帮助大；但报价居中且不支持离线，企业内网场景慎用。\\n- **若数据量大且必须私有化**，选 NexusGrid：唯一支持私有化部署，修复仅 1 天；不足是价格最高、迭代节奏最慢，且**万行性能无官方基准**，强烈建议先做 PoC。\\n\\n**给决策会的三点提示：**\\n1. 价格梯度 ¥5 / ¥9 / ¥12，可按人头/部门分摊，避免一刀切采购。\\n2. 私有化是 NexusGrid 的独有卖点，但需校验私有 API 占比 40% 的迁移成本与后续锁定风险。\\n3. 高风险项「性能未验证」必须在合同签署前完成基准测试，并以此作为验收门槛，否则不予签收。\"}]}]}", + "repaired": true, + "valid_final": true, + "errors_final": [], + "spec": { + "title": "选型对比：LarkPipe / EchoDocs / NexusGrid", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n1", + "type": "section", + "title": "概览", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-06/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-06/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-06/vendor3" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n1a", + "type": "tabs", + "tabs": { + "tabs": [ + { + "id": "t1", + "label": "LarkPipe", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n1a1", + "type": "avatar", + "avatar": { + "name": "LarkPipe", + "sub": "消息管道 · 2019-03", + "tone": "info" + }, + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-06/vendor1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "n1a2", + "type": "kv", + "kv": [ + [ + "核心能力", + "Webhook 路由 / 重试策略 / 模板变量" + ], + [ + "报价", + "¥5 / 人 / 天" + ], + [ + "部署形态", + "仅 SaaS" + ], + [ + "发布节奏", + "近半年 6 次" + ], + [ + "平均修复周期", + "3 天" + ] + ], + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-06/vendor1" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "t2", + "label": "EchoDocs", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n1b1", + "type": "avatar", + "avatar": { + "name": "EchoDocs", + "sub": "文档协同 · 2020-06", + "tone": "ok" + }, + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-06/vendor2" + ] + }, + { + "id": "n1b2", + "type": "kv", + "kv": [ + [ + "核心能力", + "批注 / 版本链 / 全文检索" + ], + [ + "报价", + "¥9 / 人 / 天" + ], + [ + "部署形态", + "无离线" + ], + [ + "发布节奏", + "近半年 9 次" + ], + [ + "平均修复周期", + "2 天" + ] + ], + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-06/vendor2" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "t3", + "label": "NexusGrid", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n1c1", + "type": "avatar", + "avatar": { + "name": "NexusGrid", + "sub": "数据表格 · 2021-11", + "tone": "warn" + }, + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-06/vendor3" + ] + }, + { + "id": "n1c2", + "type": "kv", + "kv": [ + [ + "核心能力", + "虚拟滚动 / 单元格校验 / 导出 Excel" + ], + [ + "报价", + "¥12 / 人 / 天" + ], + [ + "部署形态", + "私有化可选" + ], + [ + "发布节奏", + "近半年 5 次" + ], + [ + "平均修复周期", + "1 天" + ] + ], + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-06/vendor3" + ] + } + ] + } + ] + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n2", + "type": "section", + "title": "关键差异横向对比", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-06/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-06/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-06/vendor3" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n2a", + "type": "table", + "table": { + "columns": [ + { + "key": "dim", + "label": "维度" + }, + { + "key": "v1", + "label": "LarkPipe" + }, + { + "key": "v2", + "label": "EchoDocs" + }, + { + "key": "v3", + "label": "NexusGrid" + } + ], + "rows": [ + { + "id": "r1", + "cells": [ + [ + "dim", + "类别 / 上线时间" + ], + [ + "v1", + "消息管道 · 2019-03" + ], + [ + "v2", + "文档协同 · 2020-06" + ], + [ + "v3", + "数据表格 · 2021-11" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r2", + "cells": [ + [ + "dim", + "核心能力" + ], + [ + "v1", + "Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量" + ], + [ + "v2", + "批注、版本链、全文检索" + ], + [ + "v3", + "虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r3", + "cells": [ + [ + "dim", + "报价" + ], + [ + "v1", + "¥5 / 人 / 天" + ], + [ + "v2", + "¥9 / 人 / 天" + ], + [ + "v3", + "¥12 / 人 / 天" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r4", + "cells": [ + [ + "dim", + "部署形态" + ], + [ + "v1", + "仅 SaaS" + ], + [ + "v2", + "无离线（仅在线）" + ], + [ + "v3", + "私有化可选" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r5", + "cells": [ + [ + "dim", + "发布节奏（近半年）" + ], + [ + "v1", + "6 次" + ], + [ + "v2", + "9 次" + ], + [ + "v3", + "5 次" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r6", + "cells": [ + [ + "dim", + "平均修复周期" + ], + [ + "v1", + "3 天" + ], + [ + "v2", + "2 天" + ], + [ + "v3", + "1 天" + ] + ] + } + ] + }, + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-06/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-06/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-06/vendor3" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n3", + "type": "section", + "title": "尽调风险备忘", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-06/riskmemo" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n3a", + "type": "progress", + "progress": { + "label": "供应商锁定（中）：私有 API 占比 40%", + "value": 0.5 + }, + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-06/riskmemo" + ] + }, + { + "id": "n3b", + "type": "progress", + "progress": { + "label": "性能未验证（高）：万行表格场景无官方基准", + "value": 0.85 + }, + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-06/riskmemo" + ] + }, + { + "id": "n3c", + "type": "progress", + "progress": { + "label": "培训成本（低）：界面术语与现有系统不一致", + "value": 0.25 + }, + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-06/riskmemo" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n4", + "type": "section", + "title": "建议与结论", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n4a", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "**综合结论：按场景分层组合选用，不建议单点采购一家覆盖全部需求。**\n\n- **若核心痛点是流程消息触发的稳定性**，优先 LarkPipe：报价最低、修复周期稳定，Webhook + 重试 + 模板能力直接覆盖主链路；代价是仅 SaaS，需接受公网依赖与合规约束。\n- **若需要文档沉淀与多人协作**，选 EchoDocs：迭代最快、修复 2 天，全文检索对回溯帮助大；但报价居中且不支持离线，企业内网场景慎用。\n- **若数据量大且必须私有化**，选 NexusGrid：唯一支持私有化部署，修复仅 1 天；不足是价格最高、迭代节奏最慢，且**万行性能无官方基准**，强烈建议先做 PoC。\n\n**给决策会的三点提示：**\n1. 价格梯度 ¥5 / ¥9 / ¥12，可按人头/部门分摊，避免一刀切采购。\n2. 私有化是 NexusGrid 的独有卖点，但需校验私有 API 占比 40% 的迁移成本与后续锁定风险。\n3. 高风险项「性能未验证」必须在合同签署前完成基准测试，并以此作为验收门槛，否则不予签收。" + } + ] + } + ] + }, + "stats_final": { + "nodes": 16, + "maxDepth": 3, + "types": [ + "section", + "tabs", + "avatar", + "kv", + "avatar", + "kv", + "avatar", + "kv", + "section", + "table", + "section", + "progress", + "progress", + "progress", + "section", + "markdown" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "doc:eval/rc-06/riskmemo", + "doc:eval/rc-06/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-06/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-06/vendor3" + ], + "idsProvided": 16 + }, + "wall_s": 67.2 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-07.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-07.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..6342a0a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-07.json @@ -0,0 +1,365 @@ +{ + "task": "rc-07", + "family": "research-compare", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "compare", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 5847, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1091, + "completion_tokens": 4756, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 3590 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 27.48 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"三方工具选型对比 · 决策会一页\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"概览对比\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1t\",\"type\":\"table\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"],\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"dim\",\"label\":\"维度\"},{\"key\":\"v1\",\"label\":\"LarkPipe\"},{\"key\":\"v2\",\"label\":\"VaultKeep\"},{\"key\":\"v3\",\"label\":\"EchoDocs\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"r1\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"类型 / 上线\"],[\"v1\",\"消息管道 · 2019-03\"],[\"v2\",\"权限中枢 · 2022-08\"],[\"v3\",\"文档协同 · 2020-06\"]]},{\"id\":\"r2\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"核心能力\"],[\"v1\",\"Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量\"],[\"v2\",\"RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换\"],[\"v3\",\"批注、版本链、全文检索\"]]},{\"id\":\"r3\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"报价\"],[\"v1\",\"¥5 / 人 / 天\"],[\"v2\",\"¥15 / 人 / 天\"],[\"v3\",\"¥9 / 人 / 天\"]]},{\"id\":\"r4\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"部署形态\"],[\"v1\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"v2\",\"支持国密\"],[\"v3\",\"无离线\"]]},{\"id\":\"r5\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"半年发布次数\"],[\"v1\",\"7\"],[\"v2\",\"4\"],[\"v3\",\"2\"]]},{\"id\":\"r6\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"平均修复周期\"],[\"v1\",\"2 天\"],[\"v2\",\"4 天\"],[\"v3\",\"1 天\"]]}]}},{\"id\":\"n1c\",\"type\":\"chart-lite\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"],\"chart\":{\"kind\":\"bar\",\"labels\":[\"LarkPipe\",\"VaultKeep\",\"EchoDocs\"],\"series\":[5,15,9]}}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"尽调风险备忘\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2t\",\"type\":\"tree\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"tree\":{\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"rk1\",\"label\":\"性能未验证\",\"tone\":\"danger\",\"badge\":\"高\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"rk1d\",\"label\":\"万行表格场景无官方基准\"}]},{\"id\":\"rk2\",\"label\":\"供应商锁定\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"badge\":\"中\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"rk2d\",\"label\":\"私有 API 占比 40%\"}]},{\"id\":\"rk3\",\"label\":\"培训成本\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"badge\":\"低\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"rk3d\",\"label\":\"界面术语与现有系统不一致\"}]}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"建议与理由\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3m\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**结论：按\\\"管道 + 权限\\\"双供应商组合选型，不建议三选一。**\\n\\n**推荐组合：LarkPipe + VaultKeep**\\n- **LarkPipe 承担消息链路**：上线最久（2019-03）、半年发布 7 次、修复周期 2 天，活跃度与稳定性最佳；¥5/人/天 成本最低。但**仅 SaaS**，需在合同中明确数据驻留与审计条款。\\n- **VaultKeep 承担权限中枢**：RBAC + 临时令牌 + 密钥轮换能力最完整，且**支持国密**，匹配合规要求。代价是 ¥15/人/天 报价最高、修复 4 天偏长，需预留兜底流程。\\n- **EchoDocs 暂作备选**：修复最快（1 天），适合协同场景补位；但**无离线**部署且发布频率低（半年仅 2 次），对核心链路投入价值有限。\\n\\n**关键风险缓释**（依据尽调风险备忘）：\\n1. **性能未验证（高）**：三家在万行表格场景均无官方基准，签约前必须做 POC，覆盖吞吐、延迟、内存峰值。\\n2. **供应商锁定（中）**：私有 API 已占 40%，要求供应商提供 OpenAPI 描述与导出工具，并在合同约定数据可携性。\\n3. **培训成本（低）**：界面术语不一致，建议统一术语表 + 内部知识库，不阻塞选型。\\n\\n**若必须三选一**\\n- 重合规 / 权限：选 **VaultKeep**；\\n- 重成本 / 活跃度：选 **LarkPipe**；\\n- 仅作协同补位：选 **EchoDocs**。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"a1\",\"label\":\"查看 LarkPipe 尽调\",\"style\":\"default\"},{\"id\":\"a2\",\"label\":\"查看 VaultKeep 尽调\",\"style\":\"default\"},{\"id\":\"a3\",\"label\":\"查看 EchoDocs 尽调\",\"style\":\"default\"},{\"id\":\"a4\",\"label\":\"查看风险备忘\",\"style\":\"default\"}]}]}", + "valid_first": true, + "errors_first": [], + "stats_first": { + "nodes": 8, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "table", + "chart-lite", + "section", + "tree", + "section", + "markdown", + "actions" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo", + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3" + ], + "unknownRefs": [] + }, + "repaired": false, + "valid_final": true, + "errors_final": [], + "spec": { + "title": "三方工具选型对比 · 决策会一页", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n1", + "type": "section", + "title": "概览对比", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n1t", + "type": "table", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3" + ], + "table": { + "columns": [ + { + "key": "dim", + "label": "维度" + }, + { + "key": "v1", + "label": "LarkPipe" + }, + { + "key": "v2", + "label": "VaultKeep" + }, + { + "key": "v3", + "label": "EchoDocs" + } + ], + "rows": [ + { + "id": "r1", + "cells": [ + [ + "dim", + "类型 / 上线" + ], + [ + "v1", + "消息管道 · 2019-03" + ], + [ + "v2", + "权限中枢 · 2022-08" + ], + [ + "v3", + "文档协同 · 2020-06" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r2", + "cells": [ + [ + "dim", + "核心能力" + ], + [ + "v1", + "Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量" + ], + [ + "v2", + "RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换" + ], + [ + "v3", + "批注、版本链、全文检索" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r3", + "cells": [ + [ + "dim", + "报价" + ], + [ + "v1", + "¥5 / 人 / 天" + ], + [ + "v2", + "¥15 / 人 / 天" + ], + [ + "v3", + "¥9 / 人 / 天" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r4", + "cells": [ + [ + "dim", + "部署形态" + ], + [ + "v1", + "仅 SaaS" + ], + [ + "v2", + "支持国密" + ], + [ + "v3", + "无离线" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r5", + "cells": [ + [ + "dim", + "半年发布次数" + ], + [ + "v1", + "7" + ], + [ + "v2", + "4" + ], + [ + "v3", + "2" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r6", + "cells": [ + [ + "dim", + "平均修复周期" + ], + [ + "v1", + "2 天" + ], + [ + "v2", + "4 天" + ], + [ + "v3", + "1 天" + ] + ] + } + ] + } + }, + { + "id": "n1c", + "type": "chart-lite", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3" + ], + "chart": { + "kind": "bar", + "labels": [ + "LarkPipe", + "VaultKeep", + "EchoDocs" + ], + "series": [ + 5, + 15, + 9 + ] + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n2", + "type": "section", + "title": "尽调风险备忘", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n2t", + "type": "tree", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo" + ], + "tree": { + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "rk1", + "label": "性能未验证", + "tone": "danger", + "badge": "高", + "children": [ + { + "id": "rk1d", + "label": "万行表格场景无官方基准" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rk2", + "label": "供应商锁定", + "tone": "warn", + "badge": "中", + "children": [ + { + "id": "rk2d", + "label": "私有 API 占比 40%" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rk3", + "label": "培训成本", + "tone": "info", + "badge": "低", + "children": [ + { + "id": "rk3d", + "label": "界面术语与现有系统不一致" + } + ] + } + ] + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n3", + "type": "section", + "title": "建议与理由", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n3m", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "**结论：按\"管道 + 权限\"双供应商组合选型，不建议三选一。**\n\n**推荐组合：LarkPipe + VaultKeep**\n- **LarkPipe 承担消息链路**：上线最久（2019-03）、半年发布 7 次、修复周期 2 天，活跃度与稳定性最佳；¥5/人/天 成本最低。但**仅 SaaS**，需在合同中明确数据驻留与审计条款。\n- **VaultKeep 承担权限中枢**：RBAC + 临时令牌 + 密钥轮换能力最完整，且**支持国密**，匹配合规要求。代价是 ¥15/人/天 报价最高、修复 4 天偏长，需预留兜底流程。\n- **EchoDocs 暂作备选**：修复最快（1 天），适合协同场景补位；但**无离线**部署且发布频率低（半年仅 2 次），对核心链路投入价值有限。\n\n**关键风险缓释**（依据尽调风险备忘）：\n1. **性能未验证（高）**：三家在万行表格场景均无官方基准，签约前必须做 POC，覆盖吞吐、延迟、内存峰值。\n2. **供应商锁定（中）**：私有 API 已占 40%，要求供应商提供 OpenAPI 描述与导出工具，并在合同约定数据可携性。\n3. **培训成本（低）**：界面术语不一致，建议统一术语表 + 内部知识库，不阻塞选型。\n\n**若必须三选一**\n- 重合规 / 权限：选 **VaultKeep**；\n- 重成本 / 活跃度：选 **LarkPipe**；\n- 仅作协同补位：选 **EchoDocs**。" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n4", + "type": "actions", + "actions": [ + { + "id": "a1", + "label": "查看 LarkPipe 尽调", + "style": "default" + }, + { + "id": "a2", + "label": "查看 VaultKeep 尽调", + "style": "default" + }, + { + "id": "a3", + "label": "查看 EchoDocs 尽调", + "style": "default" + }, + { + "id": "a4", + "label": "查看风险备忘", + "style": "default" + } + ] + } + ] + }, + "stats_final": { + "nodes": 8, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "table", + "chart-lite", + "section", + "tree", + "section", + "markdown", + "actions" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo", + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3" + ], + "idsProvided": 8 + }, + "wall_s": 27.5 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-08.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-08.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..f12c3fb6 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-08.json @@ -0,0 +1,370 @@ +{ + "task": "rc-08", + "family": "research-compare", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "risk", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 6624, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1092, + "completion_tokens": 5532, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 4254 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 1091 + } + }, + "latency_s": 36.68 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"风控评审 · 风险分析\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"评估对象概览\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"table\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"],\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"name\",\"label\":\"工具\"},{\"key\":\"category\",\"label\":\"类别\"},{\"key\":\"price\",\"label\":\"报价\"},{\"key\":\"deploy\",\"label\":\"部署形态\"},{\"key\":\"release\",\"label\":\"半年发布\"},{\"key\":\"fix\",\"label\":\"平均修复周期\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"r1\",\"cells\":[[\"name\",\"LarkPipe\"],[\"category\",\"消息管道\"],[\"price\",\"¥5/人/天\"],[\"deploy\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"release\",\"7 次\"],[\"fix\",\"2 天\"]]},{\"id\":\"r2\",\"cells\":[[\"name\",\"VaultKeep\"],[\"category\",\"权限中枢\"],[\"price\",\"¥15/人/天\"],[\"deploy\",\"国密支持\"],[\"release\",\"4 次\"],[\"fix\",\"4 天\"]]},{\"id\":\"r3\",\"cells\":[[\"name\",\"EchoDocs\"],[\"category\",\"文档协同\"],[\"price\",\"¥9/人/天\"],[\"deploy\",\"无离线\"],[\"release\",\"2 次\"],[\"fix\",\"1 天\"]]}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"风险总览（按严重度排序）\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"list\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"items\":[\"高 · 性能未验证：万行表格场景无官方基准\",\"中 · 供应商锁定：私有 API 占比 40%\",\"低 · 培训成本：界面术语与现有系统不一致\"]},{\"id\":\"n2b\",\"type\":\"doc-ref\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"docId\":\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"高风险 · 性能未验证\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"kv\":[[\"严重度\",\"高\"],[\"事实\",\"万行表格场景无官方基准\"],[\"影响范围\",\"涉及大表格 / 高频消息 / 文档检索等重负载场景\"],[\"来源\",\"尽调风险备忘\"]]},{\"id\":\"n3b\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"判断：这是本次评审的首要阻断项。万行级表格是后台与 BI 类场景常见形态,缺失基准意味着性能是否达标存在不确定性,不能仅凭宣传材料采信。\\n\\n建议:\\n- 要求提供 10k 行级独立基准报告(响应时间、内存、并发),或在沙箱自测;\\n- 不达标时准备替代方案:分库分表、缓存层、混合自研;\\n- 重点验证 LarkPipe(消息管道高频)与 EchoDocs(文档协同大表格);VaultKeep 受影响相对较小,可降低优先级。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"中风险 · 供应商锁定\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"kv\":[[\"严重度\",\"中\"],[\"事实\",\"私有 API 占比 40%\"],[\"来源\",\"尽调风险备忘\"]]},{\"id\":\"n4b\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"判断:40% 私有 API 处于可观察但需提前防控的区间,本身不构成否决,但需通过工程手段稀释长期风险。\\n\\n建议:\\n- 采购合同写入 API 稳定性承诺、变更通知期(≥6 个月)与弃用条款;\\n- 内部建设适配层(Adapter)+ 契约测试,使核心业务不直接耦合私有 API;\\n- LarkPipe(仅 SaaS)与 EchoDocs(无离线)数据出口受限,迁移成本更高,建议合同预留数据可携性条款。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"低风险 · 培训成本\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n5a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"kv\":[[\"严重度\",\"低\"],[\"事实\",\"界面术语与现有系统不一致\"],[\"来源\",\"尽调风险备忘\"]]},{\"id\":\"n5b\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"判断:典型软性风险,可通过短周期培训消除。VaultKeep 的术语(RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换)属行业标准,学习曲线最短;LarkPipe、EchoDocs 需配套术语映射表 + 1–2 周上手培训。\\n\\n建议:上线前预留缓冲窗口,准备一份内部术语对照表与 FAQ,避免与现有系统术语混淆造成误操作。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n6\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"综合判断\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n6a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"综合评估:\\n\\n- **风险排序**:性能(高)> 锁定(中)> 培训(低)。建议把性能验证作为是否进入采购流程的前置门槛,不达标即停。\\n- **修复能力侧写**:EchoDocs 1 天最快,适合试错阶段首选;VaultKeep 4 天偏慢,紧急安全修复存在不确定性,需在 SLA 中明确升级条款与赔付。\\n- **部署 / 合规约束**:VaultKeep 国密支持是加分项;LarkPipe 仅 SaaS、EchoDocs 无离线,对数据驻留敏感的业务线需慎选。\\n- **价格梯度**:5 / 9 / 15 元/人/天,呈 3 倍价差,不应单独看单价,应把性能验证与锁定风险折算进 TCO。\\n\\n结论:建议先以 EchoDocs 做小范围试点,验证大表格性能与适配层可行性;若性能达标,再依据合规诉求决定 VaultKeep(合规优先)与 LarkPipe(成本优先)的纳入顺序。\"}]}]}", + "valid_first": true, + "errors_first": [], + "stats_first": { + "nodes": 16, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "table", + "section", + "list", + "doc-ref", + "section", + "kv", + "markdown", + "section", + "kv", + "markdown", + "section", + "kv", + "markdown", + "section", + "markdown" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo", + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3" + ], + "unknownRefs": [] + }, + "repaired": false, + "valid_final": true, + "errors_final": [], + "spec": { + "title": "风控评审 · 风险分析", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n1", + "type": "section", + "title": "评估对象概览", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n1a", + "type": "table", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3" + ], + "table": { + "columns": [ + { + "key": "name", + "label": "工具" + }, + { + "key": "category", + "label": "类别" + }, + { + "key": "price", + "label": "报价" + }, + { + "key": "deploy", + "label": "部署形态" + }, + { + "key": "release", + "label": "半年发布" + }, + { + "key": "fix", + "label": "平均修复周期" + } + ], + "rows": [ + { + "id": "r1", + "cells": [ + [ + "name", + "LarkPipe" + ], + [ + "category", + "消息管道" + ], + [ + "price", + "¥5/人/天" + ], + [ + "deploy", + "仅 SaaS" + ], + [ + "release", + "7 次" + ], + [ + "fix", + "2 天" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r2", + "cells": [ + [ + "name", + "VaultKeep" + ], + [ + "category", + "权限中枢" + ], + [ + "price", + "¥15/人/天" + ], + [ + "deploy", + "国密支持" + ], + [ + "release", + "4 次" + ], + [ + "fix", + "4 天" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r3", + "cells": [ + [ + "name", + "EchoDocs" + ], + [ + "category", + "文档协同" + ], + [ + "price", + "¥9/人/天" + ], + [ + "deploy", + "无离线" + ], + [ + "release", + "2 次" + ], + [ + "fix", + "1 天" + ] + ] + } + ] + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n2", + "type": "section", + "title": "风险总览（按严重度排序）", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n2a", + "type": "list", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo" + ], + "items": [ + "高 · 性能未验证：万行表格场景无官方基准", + "中 · 供应商锁定：私有 API 占比 40%", + "低 · 培训成本：界面术语与现有系统不一致" + ] + }, + { + "id": "n2b", + "type": "doc-ref", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo" + ], + "docId": "doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n3", + "type": "section", + "title": "高风险 · 性能未验证", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n3a", + "type": "kv", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo" + ], + "kv": [ + [ + "严重度", + "高" + ], + [ + "事实", + "万行表格场景无官方基准" + ], + [ + "影响范围", + "涉及大表格 / 高频消息 / 文档检索等重负载场景" + ], + [ + "来源", + "尽调风险备忘" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "n3b", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "判断：这是本次评审的首要阻断项。万行级表格是后台与 BI 类场景常见形态,缺失基准意味着性能是否达标存在不确定性,不能仅凭宣传材料采信。\n\n建议:\n- 要求提供 10k 行级独立基准报告(响应时间、内存、并发),或在沙箱自测;\n- 不达标时准备替代方案:分库分表、缓存层、混合自研;\n- 重点验证 LarkPipe(消息管道高频)与 EchoDocs(文档协同大表格);VaultKeep 受影响相对较小,可降低优先级。" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n4", + "type": "section", + "title": "中风险 · 供应商锁定", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n4a", + "type": "kv", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo" + ], + "kv": [ + [ + "严重度", + "中" + ], + [ + "事实", + "私有 API 占比 40%" + ], + [ + "来源", + "尽调风险备忘" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "n4b", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "判断:40% 私有 API 处于可观察但需提前防控的区间,本身不构成否决,但需通过工程手段稀释长期风险。\n\n建议:\n- 采购合同写入 API 稳定性承诺、变更通知期(≥6 个月)与弃用条款;\n- 内部建设适配层(Adapter)+ 契约测试,使核心业务不直接耦合私有 API;\n- LarkPipe(仅 SaaS)与 EchoDocs(无离线)数据出口受限,迁移成本更高,建议合同预留数据可携性条款。" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n5", + "type": "section", + "title": "低风险 · 培训成本", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n5a", + "type": "kv", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo" + ], + "kv": [ + [ + "严重度", + "低" + ], + [ + "事实", + "界面术语与现有系统不一致" + ], + [ + "来源", + "尽调风险备忘" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "n5b", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "判断:典型软性风险,可通过短周期培训消除。VaultKeep 的术语(RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换)属行业标准,学习曲线最短;LarkPipe、EchoDocs 需配套术语映射表 + 1–2 周上手培训。\n\n建议:上线前预留缓冲窗口,准备一份内部术语对照表与 FAQ,避免与现有系统术语混淆造成误操作。" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n6", + "type": "section", + "title": "综合判断", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n6a", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "综合评估:\n\n- **风险排序**:性能(高)> 锁定(中)> 培训(低)。建议把性能验证作为是否进入采购流程的前置门槛,不达标即停。\n- **修复能力侧写**:EchoDocs 1 天最快,适合试错阶段首选;VaultKeep 4 天偏慢,紧急安全修复存在不确定性,需在 SLA 中明确升级条款与赔付。\n- **部署 / 合规约束**:VaultKeep 国密支持是加分项;LarkPipe 仅 SaaS、EchoDocs 无离线,对数据驻留敏感的业务线需慎选。\n- **价格梯度**:5 / 9 / 15 元/人/天,呈 3 倍价差,不应单独看单价,应把性能验证与锁定风险折算进 TCO。\n\n结论:建议先以 EchoDocs 做小范围试点,验证大表格性能与适配层可行性;若性能达标,再依据合规诉求决定 VaultKeep(合规优先)与 LarkPipe(成本优先)的纳入顺序。" + } + ] + } + ] + }, + "stats_final": { + "nodes": 16, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "table", + "section", + "list", + "doc-ref", + "section", + "kv", + "markdown", + "section", + "kv", + "markdown", + "section", + "kv", + "markdown", + "section", + "markdown" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo", + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3" + ], + "idsProvided": 16 + }, + "wall_s": 36.7 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-09.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-09.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..259ca573 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-09.json @@ -0,0 +1,415 @@ +{ + "task": "rc-09", + "family": "research-compare", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "order", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 8222, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1082, + "completion_tokens": 7140, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 5420 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 1081 + } + }, + "latency_s": 40.66 + }, + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 6926, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1131, + "completion_tokens": 5795, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 4664 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 30.53 + } + ], + "callCount": 2, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"评审后实施规划：分阶段路径、依赖与里程碑\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"规划概览\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"综合三家供应商能力与风险备忘，建议三阶段推进：① 权限底座先行（VaultKeep 提供统一身份与密钥治理）→ ② 集成管道落地（LarkPipe 打通跨系统事件）→ ③ 协同层上线（EchoDocs 承载流程化文档）。每阶段设试点、灰度、全量三个里程碑，关键路径上标注前置依赖与回退点。\"},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"type\":\"doc-ref\",\"docId\":\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"实施顺序\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"steps\":{\"current\":0,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"阶段一 · 权限底座（VaultKeep）\",\"status\":\"active\",\"tone\":\"info\"},{\"label\":\"阶段二 · 集成管道（LarkPipe）\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"info\"},{\"label\":\"阶段三 · 协同层（EchoDocs）\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"info\"}]},\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"阶段详情\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"tabs\",\"tabs\":{\"active\":\"p1\",\"tabs\":[{\"id\":\"p1\",\"label\":\"阶段一 · 权限底座\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n3a1\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"目标：建立统一身份、临时令牌与密钥轮换机制，为后续两阶段提供鉴权底座。本阶段先在小范围接入，验证 RBAC 与国密支持的兼容性，确认无误后灰度。\"},{\"id\":\"n3a2\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"供应商\",\"VaultKeep\"],[\"上线时间\",\"2022-08\"],[\"报价\",\"¥15/人/天\"],[\"部署形态\",\"国密支持\"],[\"近半年发布\",\"4 次\"],[\"平均修复周期\",\"4 天\"]],\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\"]},{\"id\":\"n3a3\",\"type\":\"progress\",\"progress\":{\"label\":\"阶段一完成度\",\"value\":0.05}}]},{\"id\":\"p2\",\"label\":\"阶段二 · 集成管道\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n3b1\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"目标：在权限底座就绪后，接入消息管道，统一事件路由与重试。优先用模板变量打通跨系统通知；部署形态仅 SaaS，需提前规划网络出口与可用性预案。\"},{\"id\":\"n3b2\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"供应商\",\"LarkPipe\"],[\"上线时间\",\"2019-03\"],[\"报价\",\"¥5/人/天\"],[\"部署形态\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"近半年发布\",\"7 次\"],[\"平均修复周期\",\"2 天\"]],\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\"]},{\"id\":\"n3b3\",\"type\":\"progress\",\"progress\":{\"label\":\"阶段二完成度\",\"value\":0}}]},{\"id\":\"p3\",\"label\":\"阶段三 · 协同层\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n3c1\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"目标：在前两阶段之上引入文档协同，补齐流程沉淀与版本追溯。无离线能力，建议在网络稳定环境使用，避免关键编辑断网；万行表格性能需在上线前压测验证。\"},{\"id\":\"n3c2\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"供应商\",\"EchoDocs\"],[\"上线时间\",\"2020-06\"],[\"报价\",\"¥9/人/天\"],[\"部署形态\",\"无离线\"],[\"近半年发布\",\"2 次\"],[\"平均修复周期\",\"1 天\"]],\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"]},{\"id\":\"n3c3\",\"type\":\"progress\",\"progress\":{\"label\":\"阶段三完成度\",\"value\":0}}]}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"依赖关系\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"阶段二与三均依赖阶段一提供的统一鉴权；阶段三进一步依赖阶段二的事件通路，以在文档版本变更时触发通知。任一上游阶段未达灰度标准，下游不进入试点。\"},{\"id\":\"n4b\",\"type\":\"tree\",\"tree\":{\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"d1\",\"label\":\"阶段一·权限底座（VaultKeep）\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"badge\":\"底座\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"d2\",\"label\":\"阶段二·集成管道（LarkPipe）\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"badge\":\"依赖鉴权\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"d3\",\"label\":\"阶段三·协同层（EchoDocs）\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"badge\":\"依赖事件通知\"}]},{\"id\":\"d4\",\"label\":\"阶段三·协同层（EchoDocs）\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"badge\":\"依赖鉴权\"}]}]},\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"里程碑\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n5a\",\"type\":\"timeline\",\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"M1 · 权限试点上线\",\"time\":\"T+2 周\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"markdown\":\"VaultKeep 完成 RBAC 与临时令牌最小可用，内部 1 个团队接入，验证国密兼容。\",\"ref\":\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\"},{\"title\":\"M2 · 权限灰度\",\"time\":\"T+5 周\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"markdown\":\"覆盖核心业务线，密钥轮换策略落地，建立回退预案与值班机制。\",\"ref\":\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\"},{\"title\":\"M3 · 管道接入\",\"time\":\"T+8 周\",\"tone\":\"pending\",\"markdown\":\"LarkPipe 接入主要系统事件源，完成 Webhook 路由与重试模板上线。\",\"ref\":\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\"},{\"title\":\"M4 · 协同灰度\",\"time\":\"T+11 周\",\"tone\":\"pending\",\"markdown\":\"EchoDocs 在已具备鉴权与通知的范围内灰度，开放批注与版本链。\",\"ref\":\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"},{\"title\":\"M5 · 全量推广\",\"time\":\"T+14 周\",\"tone\":\"pending\",\"markdown\":\"三阶段全量上线，建立运维值班与月度评估机制。\"}}]}]},{\"id\":\"n6\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"风险与缓解\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n6a\",\"type\":\"table\",\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"risk\",\"label\":\"风险项\"},{\"key\":\"level\",\"label\":\"等级\"},{\"key\":\"phase\",\"label\":\"影响阶段\"},{\"key\":\"mitigation\",\"label\":\"缓解建议\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"r1\",\"cells\":[[\"risk\",\"性能未验证（万行表格）\"],[\"level\",\"高\"],[\"phase\",\"阶段三\"],[\"mitigation\",\"上线前在沙箱进行万行级压测并设定性能门槛，未达标不进入灰度。\"]]},{\"id\":\"r2\",\"cells\":[[\"risk\",\"培训成本\"],[\"level\",\"低\"],[\"phase\",\"全员\"],[\"mitigation\",\"整理术语对照表与上手视频，按团队分批培训。\"]]},{\"id\":\"r3\",\"cells\":[[\"risk\",\"供应商锁定（私有 API 占比 40%）\"],[\"level\",\"中\"],[\"phase\",\"阶段二/三\"],[\"mitigation\",\"将私有 API 封装为内部适配层，关键数据定期导出双备份。\"]]}]},\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n7\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"下一步行动\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n7a\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"a1\",\"label\":\"启动阶段一试点\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"a2\",\"label\":\"召集三方评审会\",\"style\":\"default\"},{\"id\":\"a3\",\"label\":\"建立风险跟踪表\",\"style\":\"default\"}]}}]}", + "valid_first": false, + "errors_first": [ + "JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 3432 (char 3431)" + ], + "stats_first": null, + "raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"评审后实施规划\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"s1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"实施概览\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"基于三家候选产品的尽调结果，建议按「权限先行→消息接入→文档协同」的顺序分三阶段推进。理由：权限类工具涉及安全合规应最早落地；消息管道承担系统集成枢纽，需在权限就绪后接入；文档协同为业务增强层，依赖前两者提供身份与事件流。\"},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"候选数\",\"3 家\"],[\"风险等级\",\"高 1 / 中 1 / 低 1\"],[\"部署形态\",\"SaaS 1 / 国密 1 / 仅在线 1\"],[\"平均修复周期\",\"1~4 天\"]],\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"]}]},{\"id\":\"s2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"候选对比\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"table\",\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"name\",\"label\":\"产品\"},{\"key\":\"cat\",\"label\":\"类别\"},{\"key\":\"price\",\"label\":\"报价\"},{\"key\":\"deploy\",\"label\":\"部署形态\"},{\"key\":\"release\",\"label\":\"半年发布\"},{\"key\":\"fix\",\"label\":\"平均修复\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"r1\",\"cells\":[[\"name\",\"LarkPipe\"],[\"cat\",\"消息管道\"],[\"price\",\"¥5/人/天\"],[\"deploy\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"release\",\"7 次\"],[\"fix\",\"2 天\"]]},{\"id\":\"r2\",\"cells\":[[\"name\",\"VaultKeep\"],[\"cat\",\"权限中枢\"],[\"price\",\"¥15/人/天\"],[\"deploy\",\"国密支持\"],[\"release\",\"4 次\"],[\"fix\",\"4 天\"]]},{\"id\":\"r3\",\"cells\":[[\"name\",\"EchoDocs\"],[\"cat\",\"文档协同\"],[\"price\",\"¥9/人/天\"],[\"deploy\",\"无离线\"],[\"release\",\"2 次\"],[\"fix\",\"1 天\"]]}]},\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"]}]},{\"id\":\"s3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"风险与依赖\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"tree\",\"tree\":{\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"rk1\",\"label\":\"性能未验证（高）\",\"tone\":\"danger\",\"badge\":\"高\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"rk1a\",\"label\":\"万行表格场景无官方基准\"}]},{\"id\":\"rk2\",\"label\":\"供应商锁定（中）\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"badge\":\"中\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"rk2a\",\"label\":\"私有 API 占比 40%\"}]},{\"id\":\"rk3\",\"label\":\"培训成本（低）\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"badge\":\"低\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"rk3a\",\"label\":\"界面术语与现有系统不一致\"}]}]},\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"]},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"依赖推演：VaultKeep 必须先上线以提供统一身份；LarkPipe 接入前需确认 Webhook 出口与 VaultKeep 令牌机制对接；EchoDocs 批注与版本链可利用 LarkPipe 的模板变量通知，因此排至末段。性能基准缺失应在 Phase 0 补齐，避免阻塞 Phase 1。\"}]},{\"id\":\"s4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"实施路线\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n6\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"steps\":{\"current\":0,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"Phase 0 基准验证\",\"status\":\"active\",\"tone\":\"info\"},{\"label\":\"Phase 1 VaultKeep 上线\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"label\":\"Phase 2 LarkPipe 接入\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"info\"},{\"label\":\"Phase 3 EchoDocs 推广\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"ok\"}]}},{\"id\":\"n7\",\"type\":\"timeline\",\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"M0 性能基准与术语映射\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"markdown\":\"完成万行表格压测，确认术语表，培训成本低风险闭环。\"},{\"title\":\"M1 VaultKeep 上线\",\"time\":\"Phase 1\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"markdown\":\"RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换就绪，国密环境贯通。\"},{\"title\":\"M2 LarkPipe 集成\",\"time\":\"Phase 2\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"markdown\":\"Webhook 路由 + 重试策略对齐 VaultKeep 身份。\"},{\"title\":\"M3 EchoDocs 全量推广\",\"time\":\"Phase 3\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"markdown\":\"批注与版本链交付，关注 40% 私有 API 锁定风险。\"}]},\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"]}]},{\"id\":\"s5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"决策确认\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n8\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"a1\",\"label\":\"批准按此顺序推进\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"a2\",\"label\":\"调整 Phase 1 范围\",\"style\":\"default\"},{\"id\":\"a3\",\"label\":\"要求补充性能基准\",\"style\":\"danger\"}]}]}]}", + "repaired": true, + "valid_final": true, + "errors_final": [], + "spec": { + "title": "评审后实施规划", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "s1", + "type": "section", + "title": "实施概览", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n1", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "基于三家候选产品的尽调结果，建议按「权限先行→消息接入→文档协同」的顺序分三阶段推进。理由：权限类工具涉及安全合规应最早落地；消息管道承担系统集成枢纽，需在权限就绪后接入；文档协同为业务增强层，依赖前两者提供身份与事件流。" + }, + { + "id": "n2", + "type": "kv", + "kv": [ + [ + "候选数", + "3 家" + ], + [ + "风险等级", + "高 1 / 中 1 / 低 1" + ], + [ + "部署形态", + "SaaS 1 / 国密 1 / 仅在线 1" + ], + [ + "平均修复周期", + "1~4 天" + ] + ], + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3", + "doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "s2", + "type": "section", + "title": "候选对比", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n3", + "type": "table", + "table": { + "columns": [ + { + "key": "name", + "label": "产品" + }, + { + "key": "cat", + "label": "类别" + }, + { + "key": "price", + "label": "报价" + }, + { + "key": "deploy", + "label": "部署形态" + }, + { + "key": "release", + "label": "半年发布" + }, + { + "key": "fix", + "label": "平均修复" + } + ], + "rows": [ + { + "id": "r1", + "cells": [ + [ + "name", + "LarkPipe" + ], + [ + "cat", + "消息管道" + ], + [ + "price", + "¥5/人/天" + ], + [ + "deploy", + "仅 SaaS" + ], + [ + "release", + "7 次" + ], + [ + "fix", + "2 天" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r2", + "cells": [ + [ + "name", + "VaultKeep" + ], + [ + "cat", + "权限中枢" + ], + [ + "price", + "¥15/人/天" + ], + [ + "deploy", + "国密支持" + ], + [ + "release", + "4 次" + ], + [ + "fix", + "4 天" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r3", + "cells": [ + [ + "name", + "EchoDocs" + ], + [ + "cat", + "文档协同" + ], + [ + "price", + "¥9/人/天" + ], + [ + "deploy", + "无离线" + ], + [ + "release", + "2 次" + ], + [ + "fix", + "1 天" + ] + ] + } + ] + }, + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "s3", + "type": "section", + "title": "风险与依赖", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n4", + "type": "tree", + "tree": { + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "rk1", + "label": "性能未验证（高）", + "tone": "danger", + "badge": "高", + "children": [ + { + "id": "rk1a", + "label": "万行表格场景无官方基准" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rk2", + "label": "供应商锁定（中）", + "tone": "warn", + "badge": "中", + "children": [ + { + "id": "rk2a", + "label": "私有 API 占比 40%" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rk3", + "label": "培训成本（低）", + "tone": "info", + "badge": "低", + "children": [ + { + "id": "rk3a", + "label": "界面术语与现有系统不一致" + } + ] + } + ] + }, + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo" + ] + }, + { + "id": "n5", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "依赖推演：VaultKeep 必须先上线以提供统一身份；LarkPipe 接入前需确认 Webhook 出口与 VaultKeep 令牌机制对接；EchoDocs 批注与版本链可利用 LarkPipe 的模板变量通知，因此排至末段。性能基准缺失应在 Phase 0 补齐，避免阻塞 Phase 1。" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "s4", + "type": "section", + "title": "实施路线", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n6", + "type": "steps", + "steps": { + "current": 0, + "steps": [ + { + "label": "Phase 0 基准验证", + "status": "active", + "tone": "info" + }, + { + "label": "Phase 1 VaultKeep 上线", + "status": "pending", + "tone": "warn" + }, + { + "label": "Phase 2 LarkPipe 接入", + "status": "pending", + "tone": "info" + }, + { + "label": "Phase 3 EchoDocs 推广", + "status": "pending", + "tone": "ok" + } + ] + } + }, + { + "id": "n7", + "type": "timeline", + "timeline": { + "items": [ + { + "title": "M0 性能基准与术语映射", + "tone": "info", + "markdown": "完成万行表格压测，确认术语表，培训成本低风险闭环。" + }, + { + "title": "M1 VaultKeep 上线", + "time": "Phase 1", + "tone": "ok", + "markdown": "RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换就绪，国密环境贯通。" + }, + { + "title": "M2 LarkPipe 集成", + "time": "Phase 2", + "tone": "info", + "markdown": "Webhook 路由 + 重试策略对齐 VaultKeep 身份。" + }, + { + "title": "M3 EchoDocs 全量推广", + "time": "Phase 3", + "tone": "warn", + "markdown": "批注与版本链交付，关注 40% 私有 API 锁定风险。" + } + ] + }, + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3", + "doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "s5", + "type": "section", + "title": "决策确认", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n8", + "type": "actions", + "actions": [ + { + "id": "a1", + "label": "批准按此顺序推进", + "style": "primary" + }, + { + "id": "a2", + "label": "调整 Phase 1 范围", + "style": "default" + }, + { + "id": "a3", + "label": "要求补充性能基准", + "style": "danger" + } + ] + } + ] + } + ] + }, + "stats_final": { + "nodes": 13, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "markdown", + "kv", + "section", + "table", + "section", + "tree", + "markdown", + "section", + "steps", + "timeline", + "section", + "actions" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo", + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3" + ], + "idsProvided": 13 + }, + "wall_s": 71.2 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-10.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-10.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..d0c6a5a0 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/rc-10.json @@ -0,0 +1,476 @@ +{ + "task": "rc-10", + "family": "research-compare", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "risk", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 9207, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1091, + "completion_tokens": 8116, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 1090 + } + }, + "latency_s": 74.27 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"风控评审 · 风险分析页\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"评审概览\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"本页根据三家候选厂商（EchoDocs / NexusGrid / VaultKeep）的尽调资料及内部风险备忘，整理本轮风控评审需要重点关注的风险项。所有事实性内容均标注来源，分析与建议为独立判断。\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"候选厂商对照\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"table\",\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"dim\",\"label\":\"维度\"},{\"key\":\"echo\",\"label\":\"EchoDocs\"},{\"key\":\"nexus\",\"label\":\"NexusGrid\"},{\"key\":\"vault\",\"label\":\"VaultKeep\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"r1\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"类别\"],[\"echo\",\"文档协同\"],[\"nexus\",\"数据表格\"],[\"vault\",\"权限中枢\"]]},{\"id\":\"r2\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"上线时间\"],[\"echo\",\"2020-06\"],[\"nexus\",\"2021-11\"],[\"vault\",\"2022-08\"]]},{\"id\":\"r3\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"报价\"],[\"echo\",\"¥9/人/天\"],[\"nexus\",\"¥12/人/天\"],[\"vault\",\"¥15/人/天\"]]},{\"id\":\"r4\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"部署形态\"],[\"echo\",\"无离线\"],[\"nexus\",\"私有化可选\"],[\"vault\",\"国密支持\"]]},{\"id\":\"r5\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"近半年发布\"],[\"echo\",\"4 次\"],[\"nexus\",\"6 次\"],[\"vault\",\"6 次\"]]},{\"id\":\"r6\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"平均修复周期\"],[\"echo\",\"3 天\"],[\"nexus\",\"3 天\"],[\"vault\",\"5 天\"]]}]},\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-10/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-10/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-10/vendor3\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"高风险\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"avatar\",\"avatar\":{\"name\":\"性能未验证\",\"sub\":\"严重度：高\",\"tone\":\"danger\"}},{\"id\":\"n3b\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"涉及厂商\",\"NexusGrid\"],[\"风险场景\",\"万行数据表格\"],[\"事实证据\",\"无官方基准数据\"],[\"来源\",\"尽调风险备忘 + 厂商资料\"]],\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo\",\"doc:eval/rc-10/vendor2\"]},{\"id\":\"n3c\",\"type\":\"doc-ref\",\"docId\":\"doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo\"]},{\"id\":\"n3d\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**判断**：万行规模是风控复核场景的常态承载量，且 NexusGrid 是本轮引入的复核工具，性能不达标会直接拖慢复核吞吐。建议在 POC 阶段强制要求厂商提供万行场景下的「首屏渲染 / 滚动流畅度 / 导出耗时」三项官方基准，并设置明确通过阈值，作为是否进入商务谈判的前置门槛，未达标则直接终止该条线。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"中风险\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"avatar\",\"avatar\":{\"name\":\"升级断层\",\"sub\":\"严重度：中\",\"tone\":\"warn\"}},{\"id\":\"n4b\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"事实证据\",\"近两季度仅小版本发布\"],[\"影响范围\",\"候选厂商整体节奏\"],[\"来源\",\"尽调风险备忘\"]],\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo\"]},{\"id\":\"n4c\",\"type\":\"doc-ref\",\"docId\":\"doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo\"]},{\"id\":\"n4d\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**判断**：仅小版本不等于维护停滞，但结合 NexusGrid 近半年 6 次发布的节奏来看，仍需警惕「策略性收紧」。建议向厂商索取近两季度完整 changelog，区分「修补型」还是「停滞型」；若属后者，则需在合同中固化长期维护与版本路线承诺，并保留替换厂商的退出条款。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"低风险\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n5a\",\"type\":\"avatar\",\"avatar\":{\"name\":\"培训成本\",\"sub\":\"严重度：低\",\"tone\":\"info\"}},{\"id\":\"n5b\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"事实证据\",\"界面术语与现有系统不一致\"],[\"影响范围\",\"一线复核人员\"],[\"来源\",\"尽调风险备忘\"]],\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo\"]},{\"id\":\"n5c\",\"type\":\"doc-ref\",\"docId\":\"doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo\"]},{\"id\":\"n5d\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**判断**：术语差异会带来上手摩擦，但属可通过培训消化的低风险。建议作为上线验收清单的一项，要求厂商提供与现有系统的术语对照表，并对一线复核人员组织一次集中培训，把熟悉成本压在上线前而非上线后。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n6\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"综合判断\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n6a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"本轮风险呈「一高一中一低」的清晰结构：**性能未验证** 是唯一阻塞型风险，应作为 NexusGrid 是否继续推进的决定性条件；**升级断层** 属节奏观察项，合同条款可以补位；**培训成本** 属常规落地工作，纳入验收即可。\\n\\n另有一项备忘外但值得关注的次级信号：VaultKeep 平均修复周期 5 天，相较另两家的 3 天偏长，作为权限中枢其故障影响面大，建议在 SLA 中显式约定严重故障的修复时限，避免日后扯皮。\\n\\n**处置优先级**：性能基准验证 ≫ 升级断层澄清 > VaultKeep SLA 条款 > 培训验收。\"},{\"id\":\"n6b\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"a1\",\"label\":\"要求 NexusGrid 提供万行基准\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"a2\",\"label\":\"索取近两季度完整 changelog\",\"style\":\"default\"},{\"id\":\"a3\",\"label\":\"在 SLA 中固化 VaultKeep 修复时限\",\"style\":\"default\"},{\"id\":\"a4\",\"label\":\"将术语对照表纳入验收清单\",\"style\":\"default\"}]}]}]}", + "valid_first": true, + "errors_first": [], + "stats_first": { + "nodes": 22, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "markdown", + "section", + "table", + "section", + "avatar", + "kv", + "doc-ref", + "markdown", + "section", + "avatar", + "kv", + "doc-ref", + "markdown", + "section", + "avatar", + "kv", + "doc-ref", + "markdown", + "section", + "markdown", + "actions" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo", + "doc:eval/rc-10/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-10/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-10/vendor3" + ], + "unknownRefs": [] + }, + "repaired": false, + "valid_final": true, + "errors_final": [], + "spec": { + "title": "风控评审 · 风险分析页", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n1", + "type": "section", + "title": "评审概览", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n1a", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "本页根据三家候选厂商（EchoDocs / NexusGrid / VaultKeep）的尽调资料及内部风险备忘，整理本轮风控评审需要重点关注的风险项。所有事实性内容均标注来源，分析与建议为独立判断。", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n2", + "type": "section", + "title": "候选厂商对照", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n2a", + "type": "table", + "table": { + "columns": [ + { + "key": "dim", + "label": "维度" + }, + { + "key": "echo", + "label": "EchoDocs" + }, + { + "key": "nexus", + "label": "NexusGrid" + }, + { + "key": "vault", + "label": "VaultKeep" + } + ], + "rows": [ + { + "id": "r1", + "cells": [ + [ + "dim", + "类别" + ], + [ + "echo", + "文档协同" + ], + [ + "nexus", + "数据表格" + ], + [ + "vault", + "权限中枢" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r2", + "cells": [ + [ + "dim", + "上线时间" + ], + [ + "echo", + "2020-06" + ], + [ + "nexus", + "2021-11" + ], + [ + "vault", + "2022-08" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r3", + "cells": [ + [ + "dim", + "报价" + ], + [ + "echo", + "¥9/人/天" + ], + [ + "nexus", + "¥12/人/天" + ], + [ + "vault", + "¥15/人/天" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r4", + "cells": [ + [ + "dim", + "部署形态" + ], + [ + "echo", + "无离线" + ], + [ + "nexus", + "私有化可选" + ], + [ + "vault", + "国密支持" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r5", + "cells": [ + [ + "dim", + "近半年发布" + ], + [ + "echo", + "4 次" + ], + [ + "nexus", + "6 次" + ], + [ + "vault", + "6 次" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r6", + "cells": [ + [ + "dim", + "平均修复周期" + ], + [ + "echo", + "3 天" + ], + [ + "nexus", + "3 天" + ], + [ + "vault", + "5 天" + ] + ] + } + ] + }, + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-10/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-10/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-10/vendor3" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n3", + "type": "section", + "title": "高风险", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n3a", + "type": "avatar", + "avatar": { + "name": "性能未验证", + "sub": "严重度：高", + "tone": "danger" + } + }, + { + "id": "n3b", + "type": "kv", + "kv": [ + [ + "涉及厂商", + "NexusGrid" + ], + [ + "风险场景", + "万行数据表格" + ], + [ + "事实证据", + "无官方基准数据" + ], + [ + "来源", + "尽调风险备忘 + 厂商资料" + ] + ], + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo", + "doc:eval/rc-10/vendor2" + ] + }, + { + "id": "n3c", + "type": "doc-ref", + "docId": "doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo" + ] + }, + { + "id": "n3d", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "**判断**：万行规模是风控复核场景的常态承载量，且 NexusGrid 是本轮引入的复核工具，性能不达标会直接拖慢复核吞吐。建议在 POC 阶段强制要求厂商提供万行场景下的「首屏渲染 / 滚动流畅度 / 导出耗时」三项官方基准，并设置明确通过阈值，作为是否进入商务谈判的前置门槛，未达标则直接终止该条线。" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n4", + "type": "section", + "title": "中风险", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n4a", + "type": "avatar", + "avatar": { + "name": "升级断层", + "sub": "严重度：中", + "tone": "warn" + } + }, + { + "id": "n4b", + "type": "kv", + "kv": [ + [ + "事实证据", + "近两季度仅小版本发布" + ], + [ + "影响范围", + "候选厂商整体节奏" + ], + [ + "来源", + "尽调风险备忘" + ] + ], + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo" + ] + }, + { + "id": "n4c", + "type": "doc-ref", + "docId": "doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo" + ] + }, + { + "id": "n4d", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "**判断**：仅小版本不等于维护停滞，但结合 NexusGrid 近半年 6 次发布的节奏来看，仍需警惕「策略性收紧」。建议向厂商索取近两季度完整 changelog，区分「修补型」还是「停滞型」；若属后者，则需在合同中固化长期维护与版本路线承诺，并保留替换厂商的退出条款。" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n5", + "type": "section", + "title": "低风险", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n5a", + "type": "avatar", + "avatar": { + "name": "培训成本", + "sub": "严重度：低", + "tone": "info" + } + }, + { + "id": "n5b", + "type": "kv", + "kv": [ + [ + "事实证据", + "界面术语与现有系统不一致" + ], + [ + "影响范围", + "一线复核人员" + ], + [ + "来源", + "尽调风险备忘" + ] + ], + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo" + ] + }, + { + "id": "n5c", + "type": "doc-ref", + "docId": "doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo", + "source": [ + "doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo" + ] + }, + { + "id": "n5d", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "**判断**：术语差异会带来上手摩擦，但属可通过培训消化的低风险。建议作为上线验收清单的一项，要求厂商提供与现有系统的术语对照表，并对一线复核人员组织一次集中培训，把熟悉成本压在上线前而非上线后。" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n6", + "type": "section", + "title": "综合判断", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n6a", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "本轮风险呈「一高一中一低」的清晰结构：**性能未验证** 是唯一阻塞型风险，应作为 NexusGrid 是否继续推进的决定性条件；**升级断层** 属节奏观察项，合同条款可以补位；**培训成本** 属常规落地工作，纳入验收即可。\n\n另有一项备忘外但值得关注的次级信号：VaultKeep 平均修复周期 5 天，相较另两家的 3 天偏长，作为权限中枢其故障影响面大，建议在 SLA 中显式约定严重故障的修复时限，避免日后扯皮。\n\n**处置优先级**：性能基准验证 ≫ 升级断层澄清 > VaultKeep SLA 条款 > 培训验收。" + }, + { + "id": "n6b", + "type": "actions", + "actions": [ + { + "id": "a1", + "label": "要求 NexusGrid 提供万行基准", + "style": "primary" + }, + { + "id": "a2", + "label": "索取近两季度完整 changelog", + "style": "default" + }, + { + "id": "a3", + "label": "在 SLA 中固化 VaultKeep 修复时限", + "style": "default" + }, + { + "id": "a4", + "label": "将术语对照表纳入验收清单", + "style": "default" + } + ] + } + ] + } + ] + }, + "stats_final": { + "nodes": 22, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "markdown", + "section", + "table", + "section", + "avatar", + "kv", + "doc-ref", + "markdown", + "section", + "avatar", + "kv", + "doc-ref", + "markdown", + "section", + "avatar", + "kv", + "doc-ref", + "markdown", + "section", + "markdown", + "actions" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo", + "doc:eval/rc-10/vendor1", + "doc:eval/rc-10/vendor2", + "doc:eval/rc-10/vendor3" + ], + "idsProvided": 22 + }, + "wall_s": 74.3 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-01.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-01.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..20f03287 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-01.json @@ -0,0 +1,192 @@ +{ + "task": "ri-01", + "family": "requirement-input", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "collect", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 3472, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 971, + "completion_tokens": 2501, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 1930 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 15.42 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"审批系统合并 · 待决问题收集\",\"nodes\":[{\"type\":\"section\",\"id\":\"n1\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-00/context\"],\"title\":\"项目背景与约束\",\"children\":[{\"type\":\"kv\",\"id\":\"n1a\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-00/context\"],\"kv\":[[\"目标\",\"把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套\"],[\"预算上限\",\"40 万\"],[\"期望上线\",\"Q1\"],[\"审批链级数\",\"最多 5 级\"],[\"移动端入口\",\"保留\"],[\"历史数据\",\"只读归档\"],[\"干系人\",\"财务（审批人）、行政（发起人）、IT（运维）；法务事后复核合同\"]]}]},{\"type\":\"markdown\",\"id\":\"n2\",\"markdown\":\"请就以下 4 项待决问题一次性填写完成：标注 * 的是必填项，需给出明确选项；如信息尚未确认，请选择「待定」并在备注中说明，便于会议前对齐。\\n\\n填写建议（仅供参考）：\\n- **驻场实施**会显著影响预算与排期，若选「是」建议同步估算差旅与人力成本。\\n- **并发上限** 50 与 200 差距较大，决定是否需要单独性能压测与扩容预算。\\n- **跨季度下线**会影响数据迁移窗口与旧系统续费成本，需提前与财务对齐。\\n- **验收签署方**决定责任边界，建议优先选择与审批口径一致的财务作为主签署人。\"},{\"type\":\"form\",\"id\":\"n3\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-00/open\"],\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"onsite_required\",\"label\":\"供应商是否要求驻场实施？*\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"是\",\"否\",\"部分驻场\",\"待定\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"影响预算与排期估算\"},{\"key\":\"concurrency_limit\",\"label\":\"并发审批上限*\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"50\",\"200\",\"其他数值\",\"待定\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"50 与 200 决定是否需要单独性能压测\"},{\"key\":\"cross_quarter_cutover\",\"label\":\"旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度？*\",\"type\":\"boolean\",\"required\":true,\"help\":\"跨季度会影响数据迁移与旧系统续费成本\"},{\"key\":\"acceptance_signer\",\"label\":\"验收标准由谁签署？*\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"财务\",\"行政\",\"财务+行政共同签署\",\"其他角色\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"决定验收责任边界\"}]},{\"type\":\"actions\",\"id\":\"n4\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"submit\",\"label\":\"提交收集结果\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"save_draft\",\"label\":\"保存草稿\",\"style\":\"default\"}]}]}", + "valid_first": true, + "errors_first": [], + "stats_first": { + "nodes": 5, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "kv", + "markdown", + "form", + "actions" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "req:eval/ri-00/context", + "req:eval/ri-00/open" + ], + "unknownRefs": [] + }, + "repaired": false, + "valid_final": true, + "errors_final": [], + "spec": { + "title": "审批系统合并 · 待决问题收集", + "nodes": [ + { + "type": "section", + "id": "n1", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-00/context" + ], + "title": "项目背景与约束", + "children": [ + { + "type": "kv", + "id": "n1a", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-00/context" + ], + "kv": [ + [ + "目标", + "把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套" + ], + [ + "预算上限", + "40 万" + ], + [ + "期望上线", + "Q1" + ], + [ + "审批链级数", + "最多 5 级" + ], + [ + "移动端入口", + "保留" + ], + [ + "历史数据", + "只读归档" + ], + [ + "干系人", + "财务（审批人）、行政（发起人）、IT（运维）；法务事后复核合同" + ] + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "type": "markdown", + "id": "n2", + "markdown": "请就以下 4 项待决问题一次性填写完成：标注 * 的是必填项，需给出明确选项；如信息尚未确认，请选择「待定」并在备注中说明，便于会议前对齐。\n\n填写建议（仅供参考）：\n- **驻场实施**会显著影响预算与排期，若选「是」建议同步估算差旅与人力成本。\n- **并发上限** 50 与 200 差距较大，决定是否需要单独性能压测与扩容预算。\n- **跨季度下线**会影响数据迁移窗口与旧系统续费成本，需提前与财务对齐。\n- **验收签署方**决定责任边界，建议优先选择与审批口径一致的财务作为主签署人。" + }, + { + "type": "form", + "id": "n3", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-00/open" + ], + "fields": [ + { + "key": "onsite_required", + "label": "供应商是否要求驻场实施？*", + "type": "select", + "options": [ + "是", + "否", + "部分驻场", + "待定" + ], + "required": true, + "help": "影响预算与排期估算" + }, + { + "key": "concurrency_limit", + "label": "并发审批上限*", + "type": "select", + "options": [ + "50", + "200", + "其他数值", + "待定" + ], + "required": true, + "help": "50 与 200 决定是否需要单独性能压测" + }, + { + "key": "cross_quarter_cutover", + "label": "旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度？*", + "type": "boolean", + "required": true, + "help": "跨季度会影响数据迁移与旧系统续费成本" + }, + { + "key": "acceptance_signer", + "label": "验收标准由谁签署？*", + "type": "select", + "options": [ + "财务", + "行政", + "财务+行政共同签署", + "其他角色" + ], + "required": true, + "help": "决定验收责任边界" + } + ] + }, + { + "type": "actions", + "id": "n4", + "actions": [ + { + "id": "submit", + "label": "提交收集结果", + "style": "primary" + }, + { + "id": "save_draft", + "label": "保存草稿", + "style": "default" + } + ] + } + ] + }, + "stats_final": { + "nodes": 5, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "kv", + "markdown", + "form", + "actions" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "req:eval/ri-00/context", + "req:eval/ri-00/open" + ], + "idsProvided": 5 + }, + "wall_s": 15.4 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-02.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-02.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..5a7d58c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-02.json @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ +{ + "task": "ri-02", + "family": "requirement-input", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "confirm", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 3271, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 968, + "completion_tokens": 2303, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 0 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 768 + } + }, + "latency_s": 20.7 + }, + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 14383, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1017, + "completion_tokens": 13366, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 0 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 0 + } + }, + "latency_s": 103.38 + } + ], + "callCount": 2, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"审批系统合并 · 范围确认页\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"项目概览\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"],\"kv\":[[\"目标\",\"两套并行审批系统合并为一套\"],[\"预算上限\",\"40 万\"],[\"上线目标\",\"Q1\"],[\"审批链最大级数\",\"5 级\"],[\"历史数据\",\"只读归档\"],[\"保留入口\",\"移动端\"]]},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"type\":\"avatar\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"],\"avatar\":{\"name\":\"干系人\",\"sub\":\"审批 / 发起 / 运维 / 复核\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"stack\":[{\"name\":\"财务\",\"sub\":\"审批人\"},{\"name\":\"行政\",\"sub\":\"发起人\"},{\"name\":\"IT\",\"sub\":\"运维\"},{\"name\":\"法务\",\"sub\":\"事后复核合同\"}]}},{\"id\":\"n1c\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"本页将「已定约束」与「待决问题」分块呈现，已定项作为硬约束不再变更；待决项供逐项勾选确认，确认结果即形成本次合并项目的范围基线。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"compare\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-01/context\",\"req:eval/ri-01/open\"],\"compare\":{\"left\":{\"title\":\"已定约束（不再变更）\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2l1\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"以下项已确定,作为本项目的硬约束。\"},{\"id\":\"n2l2\",\"type\":\"list\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"],\"items\":[\"保留移动端入口\",\"审批链最多 5 级\",\"历史数据只读归档\",\"预算上限 40 万\",\"Q1 上线目标\"]},{\"id\":\"n2l3\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"说明:法务为合同事后复核角色,不进入实时审批链;IT 负责新系统运维并承接旧系统下线。\"}]},\"right\":{\"title\":\"待决问题（需逐项确认）\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2r1\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"以下项存在二选一或未决状态,需在本页勾选确认。\"},{\"id\":\"n2r2\",\"type\":\"list\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-01/open\"],\"items\":[\"旧系统下线窗口:是否允许跨季度?\",\"并发审批上限:50 还是 200?\",\"归档年限未定:3 年还是 5 年?\",\"供应商是否要求驻场实施?\"]}]}}},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"逐项确认\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-01/open\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-01/open\"],\"steps\":{\"current\":0,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"下线窗口\",\"status\":\"active\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"label\":\"并发上限\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"label\":\"归档年限\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"label\":\"驻场实施\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"warn\"}]}},{\"id\":\"n3b\",\"type\":\"form\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-01/open\"],\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"decommission_window\",\"label\":\"旧系统下线窗口\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"本季度内下线\",\"允许跨季度\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"决定新旧系统并行期长度与切换风险\"},{\"key\":\"concurrency_cap\",\"label\":\"并发审批上限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"50\",\"200\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"影响架构选型与性能预算\"},{\"key\":\"archive_years\",\"label\":\"归档年限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"3 年\",\"5 年\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"影响存储成本与合规保留期\"},{\"key\":\"onsite_required\",\"label\":\"供应商驻场实施\",\"type\":\"boolean\",\"required\":true,\"help\":\"影响合同结构、实施周期与预算占用\"}]}},{\"id\":\"n3c\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"提示:四项任一未选都无法提交范围基线。建议优先确认「下线窗口」与「并发上限」——这两项直接影响架构与上线排期。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"a1\",\"label\":\"确认范围基线\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"a2\",\"label\":\"导出确认页\",\"style\":\"default\"},{\"id\":\"a3\",\"label\":\"标记需再评审\",\"style\":\"danger\"}]}]}", + "valid_first": false, + "errors_first": [ + "JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 2279 (char 2278)" + ], + "stats_first": null, + "raw_repair": "{\n \"title\": \"范围确认 · 内部审批系统合并\",\n \"nodes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n1\",\n \"markdown\": \"背景摘要：把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套，预算上限 40 万，期望 Q1 上线；本页用于逐项确认范围。\",\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n2\",\n \"title\": \"干系人\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n2a\",\n \"avatar\": {\"name\": \"财务\", \"sub\": \"审批人\", \"tone\": \"info\"},\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n2b\",\n \"avatar\": {\"name\": \"行政\", \"sub\": \"发起人\", \"tone\": \"ok\"},\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n2c\",\n \"avatar\": {\"name\": \"IT\", \"sub\": \"运维\", \"tone\": \"info\"},\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n2d\",\n \"avatar\": {\"name\": \"法务\", \"sub\": \"事后复核合同\", \"tone\": \"warn\"},\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"]\n }\n ],\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n3\",\n \"title\": \"已定约束\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n3a\",\n \"table\": {\n \"columns\": [\n {\"key\": \"item\", \"label\": \"约束项\"},\n {\"key\": \"value\", \"label\": \"取值\"},\n {\"key\": \"src\", \"label\": \"出处\"}\n ],\n \"rows\": [\n {\"id\": \"r1\", \"cells\": [[\"item\", \"保留移动端入口\"], [\"value\", \"是\"], [\"src\", \"context\"]]},\n {\"id\": \"r2\", \"cells\": [[\"item\", \"审批链最大层级\"], [\"value\", \"5 级\"], [\"src\", \"context\"]]},\n {\"id\": \"r3\", \"cells\": [[\"item\", \"历史数据处理\"], [\"value\", \"只读归档\"], [\"src\", \"context\"]]},\n {\"id\": \"r4\", \"cells\": [[\"item\", \"预算上限\"], [\"value\", \"40 万\"], [\"src\", \"context\"]]},\n {\"id\": \"r5\", \"cells\": [[\"item\", \"期望上线时间\"], [\"value\", \"Q1\"], [\"src\", \"context\"]]}\n ]\n },\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"]\n }\n ],\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n4\",\n \"title\": \"待决事项（请逐项确认）\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n4a\",\n \"fields\": [\n {\"key\": \"decom_window\", \"label\": \"旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度\", \"type\": \"boolean\", \"help\": \"影响迁移窗口与并行期成本\"},\n {\"key\": \"concurrency\", \"label\": \"并发审批上限\", \"type\": \"select\", \"options\": [\"50\", \"200\"], \"help\": \"影响性能预算与压测目标\"},\n {\"key\": \"retention_years\", \"label\": \"归档年限\", \"type\": \"select\", \"options\": [\"3 年\", \"5 年\"], \"help\": \"影响存储成本与合规口径\"},\n {\"key\": \"onsite_required\", \"label\": \"供应商是否要求驻场实施\", \"type\": \"boolean\", \"help\": \"影响差旅与现场协调成本\"}\n ],\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-01/open\"]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n4b\",\n \"markdown\": \"建议优先确定并发上限与归档年限，二者直接影响架构与存储选型；下线窗口与驻场要求可在签约前再确认。\"\n }\n ],\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-01/open\"]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n5\",\n \"actions\": [\n {\"id\": \"a1\", \"label\": \"确认已定约束\", \"style\": \"primary\"},\n {\"id\": \"a2\", \"label\": \"提交待决答复\", \"style\": \"default\"},\n {\"id\": \"a3\", \"label\": \"退回补充材料\", \"style\": \"danger\"}\n ],\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-01/open\"]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n6\",\n \"docId\": \"req:eval/ri-01/context\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n7\",\n \"docId\": \"req:eval/ri-01/open\"\n }\n ]\n}", + "repaired": true, + "valid_final": false, + "errors_final": [ + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None", + "$: 未知节点类型 None" + ], + "spec": null, + "wall_s": 124.1 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-03.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-03.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..bae7929f --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-03.json @@ -0,0 +1,212 @@ +{ + "task": "ri-03", + "family": "requirement-input", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "collect", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 5119, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 973, + "completion_tokens": 4146, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 39.58 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"审批系统合并 — 待决问题收集\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"项目背景与已定事项\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-02/context\"],\"kv\":[[\"合并目标\",\"将两套并行审批系统合并为一套\"],[\"预算上限\",\"40 万\"],[\"期望上线\",\"Q1\"],[\"财务\",\"审批人\"],[\"行政\",\"发起人\"],[\"IT\",\"运维\"],[\"法务\",\"事后复核合同\"],[\"已定·移动端\",\"保留入口\"],[\"已定·审批链\",\"最多 5 级\"],[\"已定·历史数据\",\"只读归档\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"待决问题（请填写）\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"以下 4 个问题直接关系到 Q1 上线前的合同条款与实施安排，建议在一次评审会上定稿，逐项勾选后一次性提交即可。\"},{\"id\":\"n2b\",\"type\":\"form\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-02/open\"],\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"acceptance_signer\",\"label\":\"验收标准由谁签署\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"财务\",\"行政\"],\"required\":true,\"placeholder\":\"请选择\"},{\"key\":\"concurrent_limit\",\"label\":\"并发审批上限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"50\",\"200\"],\"required\":true,\"placeholder\":\"请选择\"},{\"key\":\"supplier_onsite\",\"label\":\"供应商是否要求驻场实施\",\"type\":\"boolean\",\"required\":true,\"default\":false},{\"key\":\"archive_years\",\"label\":\"归档年限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"3 年\",\"5 年\"],\"required\":true,\"placeholder\":\"请选择\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2c\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"submit\",\"label\":\"提交决策结果\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"save_draft\",\"label\":\"保存为草稿\"},{\"id\":\"cancel\",\"label\":\"取消\",\"style\":\"danger\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2d\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"提交后将按如下口径汇总：签署方 → 合同附件签字主体；并发上限 → 后端容量与压测指标；驻场实施 → 差旅与人力预算；归档年限 → 存储容量与合规成本。\"}]}]}", + "valid_first": true, + "errors_first": [], + "stats_first": { + "nodes": 7, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "kv", + "section", + "markdown", + "form", + "actions", + "markdown" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "req:eval/ri-02/context", + "req:eval/ri-02/open" + ], + "unknownRefs": [] + }, + "repaired": false, + "valid_final": true, + "errors_final": [], + "spec": { + "title": "审批系统合并 — 待决问题收集", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n1", + "type": "section", + "title": "项目背景与已定事项", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n1a", + "type": "kv", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-02/context" + ], + "kv": [ + [ + "合并目标", + "将两套并行审批系统合并为一套" + ], + [ + "预算上限", + "40 万" + ], + [ + "期望上线", + "Q1" + ], + [ + "财务", + "审批人" + ], + [ + "行政", + "发起人" + ], + [ + "IT", + "运维" + ], + [ + "法务", + "事后复核合同" + ], + [ + "已定·移动端", + "保留入口" + ], + [ + "已定·审批链", + "最多 5 级" + ], + [ + "已定·历史数据", + "只读归档" + ] + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n2", + "type": "section", + "title": "待决问题（请填写）", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n2a", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "以下 4 个问题直接关系到 Q1 上线前的合同条款与实施安排，建议在一次评审会上定稿，逐项勾选后一次性提交即可。" + }, + { + "id": "n2b", + "type": "form", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-02/open" + ], + "fields": [ + { + "key": "acceptance_signer", + "label": "验收标准由谁签署", + "type": "select", + "options": [ + "财务", + "行政" + ], + "required": true, + "placeholder": "请选择" + }, + { + "key": "concurrent_limit", + "label": "并发审批上限", + "type": "select", + "options": [ + "50", + "200" + ], + "required": true, + "placeholder": "请选择" + }, + { + "key": "supplier_onsite", + "label": "供应商是否要求驻场实施", + "type": "boolean", + "required": true, + "default": false + }, + { + "key": "archive_years", + "label": "归档年限", + "type": "select", + "options": [ + "3 年", + "5 年" + ], + "required": true, + "placeholder": "请选择" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n2c", + "type": "actions", + "actions": [ + { + "id": "submit", + "label": "提交决策结果", + "style": "primary" + }, + { + "id": "save_draft", + "label": "保存为草稿" + }, + { + "id": "cancel", + "label": "取消", + "style": "danger" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n2d", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "提交后将按如下口径汇总：签署方 → 合同附件签字主体；并发上限 → 后端容量与压测指标；驻场实施 → 差旅与人力预算；归档年限 → 存储容量与合规成本。" + } + ] + } + ] + }, + "stats_final": { + "nodes": 7, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "kv", + "section", + "markdown", + "form", + "actions", + "markdown" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "req:eval/ri-02/context", + "req:eval/ri-02/open" + ], + "idsProvided": 7 + }, + "wall_s": 39.6 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-04.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-04.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..cdd5cec5 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-04.json @@ -0,0 +1,369 @@ +{ + "task": "ri-04", + "family": "requirement-input", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "confirm", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 7349, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 971, + "completion_tokens": 6378, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 61.36 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"审批系统合并 · 范围确认页\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"项目背景\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/context\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"将内部审批从**两套并行系统**合并为**一套统一系统**。预算上限 40 万，期望 Q1 上线。本页用于实施启动前逐项确认范围。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"干系人与职责\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/context\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"财务\",\"审批人\"],[\"行政\",\"发起人\"],[\"IT\",\"运维\"],[\"法务\",\"事后复核合同\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"已定约束 · 5 项\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/context\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n6\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"预算上限\",\"≤ 40 万\"],[\"上线时间\",\"Q1\"],[\"移动端入口\",\"保留\"],[\"审批链最大级数\",\"5 级\"],[\"历史数据处理\",\"只读归档\"]]},{\"id\":\"n7\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"以上为已落定约束，实施过程中如需变更须走变更评审。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n8\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"待决事项 · 4 项待逐项确认\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/open\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n9\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"以下事项尚未拍板，每项给出当前立场与可选项，请按编号逐项选定。\"},{\"id\":\"n10\",\"type\":\"table\",\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"no\",\"label\":\"#\"},{\"key\":\"q\",\"label\":\"待决问题\"},{\"key\":\"pos\",\"label\":\"当前立场\"},{\"key\":\"opt\",\"label\":\"可选方案\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"r1\",\"cells\":[[\"no\",\"①\"],[\"q\",\"是否需要纸质兜底流程\"],[\"pos\",\"行政坚持 / IT 反对\"],[\"opt\",\"启用 或 不启用\"]]},{\"id\":\"r2\",\"cells\":[[\"no\",\"②\"],[\"q\",\"验收标准由谁签署\"],[\"pos\",\"待拍板\"],[\"opt\",\"财务 或 行政\"]]},{\"id\":\"r3\",\"cells\":[[\"no\",\"③\"],[\"q\",\"并发审批上限\"],[\"pos\",\"待拍板\"],[\"opt\",\"50 或 200\"]]},{\"id\":\"r4\",\"cells\":[[\"no\",\"④\"],[\"q\",\"供应商是否要求驻场实施\"],[\"pos\",\"待拍板\"],[\"opt\",\"需要 或 不需要\"]]}]}},{\"id\":\"n11\",\"type\":\"form\",\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"q1_paper_fallback\",\"label\":\"① 纸质兜底流程\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"启用\",\"不启用\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"行政坚持、IT 反对，需决策人拍板\"},{\"key\":\"q2_signer\",\"label\":\"② 验收标准签署人\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"财务\",\"行政\"],\"required\":true},{\"key\":\"q3_concurrent\",\"label\":\"③ 并发审批上限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"50\",\"200\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"如选 50，请评估上线后扩容成本\"},{\"key\":\"q4_onsite\",\"label\":\"④ 供应商驻场实施\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"需要\",\"不需要\"],\"required\":true}]},{\"id\":\"n12\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"补充说明：① 若启用纸质兜底，请另附纸面流程与归档机制；③ 数值选择宜保留 2~3 倍峰值冗余以应对上线后增长。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n13\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"confirm\",\"label\":\"提交范围确认\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"hold\",\"label\":\"暂存草稿\",\"style\":\"default\"},{\"id\":\"reopen\",\"label\":\"有异议，逐项再议\",\"style\":\"danger\"}]}]}", + "valid_first": true, + "errors_first": [], + "stats_first": { + "nodes": 13, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "markdown", + "section", + "kv", + "section", + "kv", + "markdown", + "section", + "markdown", + "table", + "form", + "markdown", + "actions" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "req:eval/ri-03/context", + "req:eval/ri-03/open" + ], + "unknownRefs": [] + }, + "repaired": false, + "valid_final": true, + "errors_final": [], + "spec": { + "title": "审批系统合并 · 范围确认页", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n1", + "type": "section", + "title": "项目背景", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-03/context" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n2", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "将内部审批从**两套并行系统**合并为**一套统一系统**。预算上限 40 万，期望 Q1 上线。本页用于实施启动前逐项确认范围。" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n3", + "type": "section", + "title": "干系人与职责", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-03/context" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n4", + "type": "kv", + "kv": [ + [ + "财务", + "审批人" + ], + [ + "行政", + "发起人" + ], + [ + "IT", + "运维" + ], + [ + "法务", + "事后复核合同" + ] + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n5", + "type": "section", + "title": "已定约束 · 5 项", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-03/context" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n6", + "type": "kv", + "kv": [ + [ + "预算上限", + "≤ 40 万" + ], + [ + "上线时间", + "Q1" + ], + [ + "移动端入口", + "保留" + ], + [ + "审批链最大级数", + "5 级" + ], + [ + "历史数据处理", + "只读归档" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "n7", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "以上为已落定约束，实施过程中如需变更须走变更评审。" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n8", + "type": "section", + "title": "待决事项 · 4 项待逐项确认", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-03/open" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n9", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "以下事项尚未拍板，每项给出当前立场与可选项，请按编号逐项选定。" + }, + { + "id": "n10", + "type": "table", + "table": { + "columns": [ + { + "key": "no", + "label": "#" + }, + { + "key": "q", + "label": "待决问题" + }, + { + "key": "pos", + "label": "当前立场" + }, + { + "key": "opt", + "label": "可选方案" + } + ], + "rows": [ + { + "id": "r1", + "cells": [ + [ + "no", + "①" + ], + [ + "q", + "是否需要纸质兜底流程" + ], + [ + "pos", + "行政坚持 / IT 反对" + ], + [ + "opt", + "启用 或 不启用" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r2", + "cells": [ + [ + "no", + "②" + ], + [ + "q", + "验收标准由谁签署" + ], + [ + "pos", + "待拍板" + ], + [ + "opt", + "财务 或 行政" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r3", + "cells": [ + [ + "no", + "③" + ], + [ + "q", + "并发审批上限" + ], + [ + "pos", + "待拍板" + ], + [ + "opt", + "50 或 200" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "r4", + "cells": [ + [ + "no", + "④" + ], + [ + "q", + "供应商是否要求驻场实施" + ], + [ + "pos", + "待拍板" + ], + [ + "opt", + "需要 或 不需要" + ] + ] + } + ] + } + }, + { + "id": "n11", + "type": "form", + "fields": [ + { + "key": "q1_paper_fallback", + "label": "① 纸质兜底流程", + "type": "select", + "options": [ + "启用", + "不启用" + ], + "required": true, + "help": "行政坚持、IT 反对，需决策人拍板" + }, + { + "key": "q2_signer", + "label": "② 验收标准签署人", + "type": "select", + "options": [ + "财务", + "行政" + ], + "required": true + }, + { + "key": "q3_concurrent", + "label": "③ 并发审批上限", + "type": "select", + "options": [ + "50", + "200" + ], + "required": true, + "help": "如选 50，请评估上线后扩容成本" + }, + { + "key": "q4_onsite", + "label": "④ 供应商驻场实施", + "type": "select", + "options": [ + "需要", + "不需要" + ], + "required": true + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n12", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "补充说明：① 若启用纸质兜底，请另附纸面流程与归档机制；③ 数值选择宜保留 2~3 倍峰值冗余以应对上线后增长。" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n13", + "type": "actions", + "actions": [ + { + "id": "confirm", + "label": "提交范围确认", + "style": "primary" + }, + { + "id": "hold", + "label": "暂存草稿", + "style": "default" + }, + { + "id": "reopen", + "label": "有异议，逐项再议", + "style": "danger" + } + ] + } + ] + }, + "stats_final": { + "nodes": 13, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "markdown", + "section", + "kv", + "section", + "kv", + "markdown", + "section", + "markdown", + "table", + "form", + "markdown", + "actions" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "req:eval/ri-03/context", + "req:eval/ri-03/open" + ], + "idsProvided": 13 + }, + "wall_s": 61.4 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-05.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-05.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..133678d1 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-05.json @@ -0,0 +1,212 @@ +{ + "task": "ri-05", + "family": "requirement-input", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "collect", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 3002, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 971, + "completion_tokens": 2031, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 0 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 0 + } + }, + "latency_s": 15.88 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"审批系统合并·待决问题收集表\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"项目背景与既定约束\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-04/context\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"将两套并行的内部审批系统合并为一套，预算上限 40 万，期望 Q1 上线。干系人：财务（审批人）、行政（发起人）、IT（运维），法务事后复核合同。\"},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-04/context\"],\"kv\":[[\"预算上限\",\"40 万\"],[\"目标上线\",\"Q1\"],[\"审批链级数\",\"最多 5 级\"],[\"历史数据\",\"只读归档\"],[\"移动端入口\",\"保留\"],[\"法务介入\",\"事后复核合同\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"待决问题填写\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-04/open\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-04/open\"],\"markdown\":\"以下 4 项为待决问题，请逐项勾选或选择；带 * 为必填。\"},{\"id\":\"n2b\",\"type\":\"form\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-04/open\"],\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"signer\",\"label\":\"验收标准签署方 *\",\"type\":\"select\",\"required\":true,\"options\":[\"财务\",\"行政\",\"财务+行政 联合签署\",\"暂未决定\"],\"help\":\"确定由哪一方对最终验收标准签字背书\",\"placeholder\":\"请选择签署方\"},{\"key\":\"decom_cross_quarter\",\"label\":\"旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度 *\",\"type\":\"boolean\",\"required\":true,\"help\":\"若否，则所有旧系统需在 Q1 内完成下线\"},{\"key\":\"concurrency_cap\",\"label\":\"并发审批上限 *\",\"type\":\"select\",\"required\":true,\"options\":[\"50\",\"200\",\"自定义数值\"],\"help\":\"自定义数值请在下方“备注”中注明具体数字\"},{\"key\":\"onsite\",\"label\":\"供应商是否要求驻场实施 *\",\"type\":\"boolean\",\"required\":true,\"help\":\"影响差旅成本与现场协调安排\"},{\"key\":\"notes\",\"label\":\"备注与决策依据\",\"type\":\"textarea\",\"required\":false,\"placeholder\":\"补充选择依据、阻力点或额外说明……\",\"help\":\"尤其是“自定义并发上限”的具体数值，建议在此写明\"}]}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"submit\",\"label\":\"提交决策\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"save\",\"label\":\"保存草稿\",\"style\":\"default\"}]}]}", + "valid_first": true, + "errors_first": [], + "stats_first": { + "nodes": 7, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "markdown", + "kv", + "section", + "markdown", + "form", + "actions" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "req:eval/ri-04/context", + "req:eval/ri-04/open" + ], + "unknownRefs": [] + }, + "repaired": false, + "valid_final": true, + "errors_final": [], + "spec": { + "title": "审批系统合并·待决问题收集表", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n1", + "type": "section", + "title": "项目背景与既定约束", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-04/context" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n1a", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "将两套并行的内部审批系统合并为一套，预算上限 40 万，期望 Q1 上线。干系人：财务（审批人）、行政（发起人）、IT（运维），法务事后复核合同。" + }, + { + "id": "n1b", + "type": "kv", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-04/context" + ], + "kv": [ + [ + "预算上限", + "40 万" + ], + [ + "目标上线", + "Q1" + ], + [ + "审批链级数", + "最多 5 级" + ], + [ + "历史数据", + "只读归档" + ], + [ + "移动端入口", + "保留" + ], + [ + "法务介入", + "事后复核合同" + ] + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n2", + "type": "section", + "title": "待决问题填写", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-04/open" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n2a", + "type": "markdown", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-04/open" + ], + "markdown": "以下 4 项为待决问题，请逐项勾选或选择；带 * 为必填。" + }, + { + "id": "n2b", + "type": "form", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-04/open" + ], + "fields": [ + { + "key": "signer", + "label": "验收标准签署方 *", + "type": "select", + "required": true, + "options": [ + "财务", + "行政", + "财务+行政 联合签署", + "暂未决定" + ], + "help": "确定由哪一方对最终验收标准签字背书", + "placeholder": "请选择签署方" + }, + { + "key": "decom_cross_quarter", + "label": "旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度 *", + "type": "boolean", + "required": true, + "help": "若否，则所有旧系统需在 Q1 内完成下线" + }, + { + "key": "concurrency_cap", + "label": "并发审批上限 *", + "type": "select", + "required": true, + "options": [ + "50", + "200", + "自定义数值" + ], + "help": "自定义数值请在下方“备注”中注明具体数字" + }, + { + "key": "onsite", + "label": "供应商是否要求驻场实施 *", + "type": "boolean", + "required": true, + "help": "影响差旅成本与现场协调安排" + }, + { + "key": "notes", + "label": "备注与决策依据", + "type": "textarea", + "required": false, + "placeholder": "补充选择依据、阻力点或额外说明……", + "help": "尤其是“自定义并发上限”的具体数值，建议在此写明" + } + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n3", + "type": "actions", + "actions": [ + { + "id": "submit", + "label": "提交决策", + "style": "primary" + }, + { + "id": "save", + "label": "保存草稿", + "style": "default" + } + ] + } + ] + }, + "stats_final": { + "nodes": 7, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "markdown", + "kv", + "section", + "markdown", + "form", + "actions" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "req:eval/ri-04/context", + "req:eval/ri-04/open" + ], + "idsProvided": 7 + }, + "wall_s": 15.9 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-06.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-06.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..5881b3a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-06.json @@ -0,0 +1,225 @@ +{ + "task": "ri-06", + "family": "requirement-input", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "confirm", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 4296, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 973, + "completion_tokens": 3323, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 2744 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 26.57 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"审批合并项目 · 范围确认\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"tabs\",\"tabs\":{\"tabs\":[{\"id\":\"tab-fixed\",\"label\":\"已定约束\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套，预算上限 40 万，期望 Q1 上线；法务负责合同事后复核。\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-05/context\"]},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-05/context\"],\"kv\":[[\"预算上限\",\"40 万\"],[\"上线目标\",\"Q1\"],[\"审批链级数\",\"最多 5 级\"],[\"移动端入口\",\"保留\"],[\"历史数据\",\"只读归档\"],[\"合同复核\",\"法务事后复核\"]]},{\"id\":\"n1c\",\"type\":\"list\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-05/context\"],\"items\":[\"财务 — 审批人\",\"行政 — 发起人\",\"IT — 运维\",\"法务 — 合同事后复核\"]}]},{\"id\":\"tab-open\",\"label\":\"待决事项（逐项确认）\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"以下 4 项需要逐项拍板。建议按顺序逐一确认后统一提交；如某项尚未达成共识，可先留空待后续会议仲裁。\"},{\"id\":\"n2b\",\"type\":\"form\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-05/open\"],\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"paper_fallback\",\"label\":\"① 是否需要纸质兜底流程？\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"保留纸质兜底\",\"完全电子化（取消纸质）\",\"仅异常情况启用纸质\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"行政坚持保留，IT 反对 —— 需仲裁。\"},{\"key\":\"acceptance_signer\",\"label\":\"② 验收标准由谁签署？\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"财务签署\",\"行政签署\",\"财务 + 行政联签\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"财务与行政存在分歧，需明确单一责任人或联签机制。\"},{\"key\":\"vendor_onsite\",\"label\":\"③ 供应商是否要求驻场实施？\",\"type\":\"boolean\",\"required\":true,\"help\":\"影响预算与人天安排，需向供应商索取书面确认。\"},{\"key\":\"archive_years\",\"label\":\"④ 历史数据归档年限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"3 年\",\"5 年\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"建议结合合规要求与存储成本综合决定。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2c\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"submit\",\"label\":\"提交范围确认\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"reset\",\"label\":\"清空选择\",\"style\":\"default\"},{\"id\":\"escalate\",\"label\":\"上报仲裁\",\"style\":\"danger\"}]}]}],\"active\":\"tab-fixed\"}}]}", + "valid_first": true, + "errors_first": [], + "stats_first": { + "nodes": 7, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "tabs", + "markdown", + "kv", + "list", + "markdown", + "form", + "actions" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "req:eval/ri-05/context", + "req:eval/ri-05/open" + ], + "unknownRefs": [] + }, + "repaired": false, + "valid_final": true, + "errors_final": [], + "spec": { + "title": "审批合并项目 · 范围确认", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n1", + "type": "tabs", + "tabs": { + "tabs": [ + { + "id": "tab-fixed", + "label": "已定约束", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n1a", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套，预算上限 40 万，期望 Q1 上线；法务负责合同事后复核。", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-05/context" + ] + }, + { + "id": "n1b", + "type": "kv", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-05/context" + ], + "kv": [ + [ + "预算上限", + "40 万" + ], + [ + "上线目标", + "Q1" + ], + [ + "审批链级数", + "最多 5 级" + ], + [ + "移动端入口", + "保留" + ], + [ + "历史数据", + "只读归档" + ], + [ + "合同复核", + "法务事后复核" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "n1c", + "type": "list", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-05/context" + ], + "items": [ + "财务 — 审批人", + "行政 — 发起人", + "IT — 运维", + "法务 — 合同事后复核" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "tab-open", + "label": "待决事项（逐项确认）", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n2a", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "以下 4 项需要逐项拍板。建议按顺序逐一确认后统一提交；如某项尚未达成共识，可先留空待后续会议仲裁。" + }, + { + "id": "n2b", + "type": "form", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-05/open" + ], + "fields": [ + { + "key": "paper_fallback", + "label": "① 是否需要纸质兜底流程？", + "type": "select", + "options": [ + "保留纸质兜底", + "完全电子化（取消纸质）", + "仅异常情况启用纸质" + ], + "required": true, + "help": "行政坚持保留，IT 反对 —— 需仲裁。" + }, + { + "key": "acceptance_signer", + "label": "② 验收标准由谁签署？", + "type": "select", + "options": [ + "财务签署", + "行政签署", + "财务 + 行政联签" + ], + "required": true, + "help": "财务与行政存在分歧，需明确单一责任人或联签机制。" + }, + { + "key": "vendor_onsite", + "label": "③ 供应商是否要求驻场实施？", + "type": "boolean", + "required": true, + "help": "影响预算与人天安排，需向供应商索取书面确认。" + }, + { + "key": "archive_years", + "label": "④ 历史数据归档年限", + "type": "select", + "options": [ + "3 年", + "5 年" + ], + "required": true, + "help": "建议结合合规要求与存储成本综合决定。" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n2c", + "type": "actions", + "actions": [ + { + "id": "submit", + "label": "提交范围确认", + "style": "primary" + }, + { + "id": "reset", + "label": "清空选择", + "style": "default" + }, + { + "id": "escalate", + "label": "上报仲裁", + "style": "danger" + } + ] + } + ] + } + ], + "active": "tab-fixed" + } + } + ] + }, + "stats_final": { + "nodes": 7, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "tabs", + "markdown", + "kv", + "list", + "markdown", + "form", + "actions" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "req:eval/ri-05/context", + "req:eval/ri-05/open" + ], + "idsProvided": 7 + }, + "wall_s": 26.6 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-07.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-07.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..bd7ad262 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-07.json @@ -0,0 +1,212 @@ +{ + "task": "ri-07", + "family": "requirement-input", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "collect", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 5899, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 971, + "completion_tokens": 4928, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 42.28 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"审批系统合并 · 待决问题一次性收集\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"项目背景速览\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"本页用于一次性收齐四个待决项，所有题均为必填。提交后会作为后续预算细分、上线排期与干系人对齐的依据。\"},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"预算上限\",\"40 万\"],[\"上线目标\",\"Q1\"],[\"审批链上限\",\"5 级\"],[\"移动端入口\",\"保留\"],[\"历史数据\",\"只读归档\"],[\"财务\",\"审批人\"],[\"行政\",\"发起人\"],[\"IT\",\"运维\"],[\"法务\",\"合同事后复核\"]],\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-06/context\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"四个待决问题（全部必填）\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"form\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-06/open\"],\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"shutdown_window_cross_quarter\",\"label\":\"Q1 · 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度？\",\"type\":\"select\",\"required\":true,\"options\":[\"允许跨季度\",\"不允许（必须在本季度内完成）\",\"需进一步与 IT/财务讨论\"],\"help\":\"影响并行期运维成本与数据迁移节奏\"},{\"key\":\"acceptance_signer\",\"label\":\"Q2 · 验收标准由谁签署？\",\"type\":\"select\",\"required\":true,\"options\":[\"财务\",\"行政\",\"财务 + 行政 联合签署\"],\"help\":\"财务为审批人，行政为发起人，最终签字方尚未指定\"},{\"key\":\"vendor_on_site\",\"label\":\"Q3 · 供应商是否要求驻场实施？\",\"type\":\"select\",\"required\":true,\"options\":[\"要求全驻场\",\"要求部分驻场（仅关键节点）\",\"不需要驻场（远程实施）\"],\"help\":\"决定预算内是否需要预留差旅与场地费用\"},{\"key\":\"concurrent_limit\",\"label\":\"Q4 · 并发审批上限取哪个值？\",\"type\":\"select\",\"required\":true,\"options\":[\"50（保守，资源占用低）\",\"200（宽松，预留增长）\",\"其他（请在备注中注明具体数字）\"],\"help\":\"需结合现有并发量与上线后预估峰值确定\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2b\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"建议在每一项旁边附一句简短理由（例如“为什么选 50 而不是 200”），方便后续评审追溯；交付后会按“审批系统合并 · 决策交接单”模板汇总给 IT、预算与排期负责人。\"},{\"id\":\"n2c\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"submit\",\"label\":\"提交四项决定\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"save_draft\",\"label\":\"暂存草稿\",\"style\":\"default\"}]}]}]}", + "valid_first": true, + "errors_first": [], + "stats_first": { + "nodes": 7, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "markdown", + "kv", + "section", + "form", + "markdown", + "actions" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "req:eval/ri-06/context", + "req:eval/ri-06/open" + ], + "unknownRefs": [] + }, + "repaired": false, + "valid_final": true, + "errors_final": [], + "spec": { + "title": "审批系统合并 · 待决问题一次性收集", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n1", + "type": "section", + "title": "项目背景速览", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n1a", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "本页用于一次性收齐四个待决项，所有题均为必填。提交后会作为后续预算细分、上线排期与干系人对齐的依据。" + }, + { + "id": "n1b", + "type": "kv", + "kv": [ + [ + "预算上限", + "40 万" + ], + [ + "上线目标", + "Q1" + ], + [ + "审批链上限", + "5 级" + ], + [ + "移动端入口", + "保留" + ], + [ + "历史数据", + "只读归档" + ], + [ + "财务", + "审批人" + ], + [ + "行政", + "发起人" + ], + [ + "IT", + "运维" + ], + [ + "法务", + "合同事后复核" + ] + ], + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-06/context" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n2", + "type": "section", + "title": "四个待决问题（全部必填）", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n2a", + "type": "form", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-06/open" + ], + "fields": [ + { + "key": "shutdown_window_cross_quarter", + "label": "Q1 · 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度？", + "type": "select", + "required": true, + "options": [ + "允许跨季度", + "不允许（必须在本季度内完成）", + "需进一步与 IT/财务讨论" + ], + "help": "影响并行期运维成本与数据迁移节奏" + }, + { + "key": "acceptance_signer", + "label": "Q2 · 验收标准由谁签署？", + "type": "select", + "required": true, + "options": [ + "财务", + "行政", + "财务 + 行政 联合签署" + ], + "help": "财务为审批人，行政为发起人，最终签字方尚未指定" + }, + { + "key": "vendor_on_site", + "label": "Q3 · 供应商是否要求驻场实施？", + "type": "select", + "required": true, + "options": [ + "要求全驻场", + "要求部分驻场（仅关键节点）", + "不需要驻场（远程实施）" + ], + "help": "决定预算内是否需要预留差旅与场地费用" + }, + { + "key": "concurrent_limit", + "label": "Q4 · 并发审批上限取哪个值？", + "type": "select", + "required": true, + "options": [ + "50（保守，资源占用低）", + "200（宽松，预留增长）", + "其他（请在备注中注明具体数字）" + ], + "help": "需结合现有并发量与上线后预估峰值确定" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n2b", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "建议在每一项旁边附一句简短理由（例如“为什么选 50 而不是 200”），方便后续评审追溯；交付后会按“审批系统合并 · 决策交接单”模板汇总给 IT、预算与排期负责人。" + }, + { + "id": "n2c", + "type": "actions", + "actions": [ + { + "id": "submit", + "label": "提交四项决定", + "style": "primary" + }, + { + "id": "save_draft", + "label": "暂存草稿", + "style": "default" + } + ] + } + ] + } + ] + }, + "stats_final": { + "nodes": 7, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "markdown", + "kv", + "section", + "form", + "markdown", + "actions" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "req:eval/ri-06/context", + "req:eval/ri-06/open" + ], + "idsProvided": 7 + }, + "wall_s": 42.3 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-08.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-08.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b562bccc --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-08.json @@ -0,0 +1,297 @@ +{ + "task": "ri-08", + "family": "requirement-input", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "confirm", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 4178, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 973, + "completion_tokens": 3205, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 29.67 + }, + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 11769, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1020, + "completion_tokens": 10749, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 0 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 0 + } + }, + "latency_s": 77.25 + } + ], + "callCount": 2, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"审批系统合并 · 范围确认\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"项目概述\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-07/context\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-07/context\"],\"markdown\":\"把内部审批从 **两套并行系统** 合并为 **一套统一系统**。本页用于启动前的范围确认：将已锁定的约束与仍待你拍板的开放问题**分开展示**，待决项支持逐项勾选确认。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"tabs\",\"tabs\":[{\"id\":\"t-decided\",\"label\":\"已定约束（只读）\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-07/context\"],\"kv\":[[\"合并背景\",\"两套并行审批系统 → 一套统一系统\"],[\"预算上限\",\"40 万\"],[\"上线目标\",\"Q1\"],[\"审批人\",\"财务\"],[\"发起人\",\"行政\"],[\"运维方\",\"IT\"],[\"合同复核\",\"法务（事后）\"]]},{\"id\":\"n2b\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"系统硬约束\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-07/context\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2b1\",\"type\":\"list\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-07/context\"],\"items\":[\"保留移动端入口\",\"审批链最多 5 级\",\"历史数据：只读归档\"]]}]}]},{\"id\":\"t-open\",\"label\":\"待决事项（4 项 · 待你逐项确认）\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2c\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"以下 4 个问题尚未定案，请**逐项选择**后提交；涉及干系人分歧的项已标注分歧方。\"},{\"id\":\"n2d\",\"type\":\"form\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-07/open\"],\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"q_concurrency\",\"label\":\"Q1 · 并发审批上限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"50\",\"200\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"在 50 与 200 之间二选一，决定系统容量基线\"},{\"key\":\"q_acceptance\",\"label\":\"Q2 · 验收标准签署方\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"财务\",\"行政\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"决定谁对验收标准负责签署\"},{\"key\":\"q_paper_fallback\",\"label\":\"Q3 · 是否保留纸质兜底流程\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"需要纸质兜底（行政立场）\",\"不需要纸质兜底（IT 立场）\",\"采用其他方案\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"干系人分歧项：行政坚持、IT 反对\"},{\"key\":\"q_migration_window\",\"label\":\"Q4 · 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"允许跨季度\",\"仅限同季度内\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"影响迁移与切换计划的时间颗粒度\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2e\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"submit\",\"label\":\"提交确认结果\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"reset\",\"label\":\"重置选择\",\"style\":\"default\"}]}]}],\"active\":\"t-open\"}]}", + "valid_first": false, + "errors_first": [ + "JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 756 (char 755)" + ], + "stats_first": null, + "raw_repair": "{\n \"title\": \"审批合并 · 范围逐项确认\",\n \"nodes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n1\",\n \"type\": \"section\",\n \"title\": \"项目背景\",\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-07/context\"],\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n1a\",\n \"type\": \"markdown\",\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-07/context\"],\n \"markdown\": \"把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套，预算上限 40 万，期望 Q1 上线。\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n1b\",\n \"type\": \"kv\",\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-07/context\"],\n \"kv\": [\n [\"合并目标\", \"两套并行审批系统 → 一套\"],\n [\"预算上限\", \"40 万\"],\n [\"目标上线\", \"Q1\"]\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n1c\",\n \"type\": \"doc-ref\",\n \"docId\": \"req:eval/ri-07/context\"\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n2\",\n \"type\": \"section\",\n \"title\": \"干系人\",\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-07/context\"],\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n2a\",\n \"type\": \"list\",\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-07/context\"],\n \"items\": [\n \"财务 — 审批人\",\n \"行政 — 发起人\",\n \"IT — 运维\",\n \"法务 — 事后复核合同\"\n ]\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n3\",\n \"type\": \"section\",\n \"title\": \"已定约束\",\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-07/context\"],\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n3a\",\n \"type\": \"list\",\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-07/context\"],\n \"items\": [\n \"保留移动端入口\",\n \"审批链最多 5 级\",\n \"历史数据只读归档\",\n \"预算上限 40 万\",\n \"期望 Q1 上线\"\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n3b\",\n \"type\": \"doc-ref\",\n \"docId\": \"req:eval/ri-07/context\"\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n4\",\n \"type\": \"section\",\n \"title\": \"待决事项 · 逐项确认\",\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-07/open\"],\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n4a\",\n \"type\": \"form\",\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-07/open\"],\n \"fields\": [\n {\n \"key\": \"concurrency_cap\",\n \"label\": \"并发审批上限\",\n \"type\": \"select\",\n \"options\": [\"50\", \"200\"],\n \"required\": true,\n \"help\": \"二选一，请确认。\"\n },\n {\n \"key\": \"acceptance_signer\",\n \"label\": \"验收标准签署方\",\n \"type\": \"select\",\n \"options\": [\"财务\", \"行政\"],\n \"required\": true,\n \"help\": \"由财务还是行政签署？\"\n },\n {\n \"key\": \"paper_fallback\",\n \"label\": \"是否需要纸质兜底流程\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\",\n \"required\": true,\n \"help\": \"行政坚持，IT 反对，见下方对照。\"\n },\n {\n \"key\": \"cross_quarter_cutover\",\n \"label\": \"旧系统下线允许跨季度\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\",\n \"required\": true,\n \"help\": \"若否，请指定本季度内窗口。\"\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n4b\",\n \"type\": \"compare\",\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-07/open\"],\n \"compare\": {\n \"left\": {\n \"title\": \"行政立场\",\n \"tone\": \"info\",\n \"nodes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n4b1\",\n \"type\": \"markdown\",\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-07/open\"],\n \"markdown\": \"坚持：保留纸质兜底流程。\"\n }\n ]\n },\n \"right\": {\n \"title\": \"IT 立场\",\n \"tone\": \"warn\",\n \"nodes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n4b2\",\n \"type\": \"markdown\",\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-07/open\"],\n \"markdown\": \"反对：不需要纸质兜底流程。\"\n }\n ]\n }\n }\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n5\",\n \"type\": \"section\",\n \"title\": \"推进建议\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n5a\",\n \"type\": \"markdown\",\n \"markdown\": \"建议优先敲定并发上限与签署方（影响实现与合同条款），再处理纸质兜底冲突（建议拉一次 15 分钟对齐会，明确失效场景与责任归属），最后确定下线窗口。若下线跨季度，建议在合同里写明过渡期数据访问方式。\"\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n6\",\n \"type\": \"actions\",\n \"actions\": [\n {\"id\": \"confirm_all\", \"label\": \"确认本页所有项\", \"style\": \"primary\"},\n {\"id\": \"schedule_meeting\", \"label\": \"发起对齐会\", \"style\": \"default\"}\n ]\n }\n ]\n}", + "repaired": true, + "valid_final": true, + "errors_final": [], + "spec": { + "title": "审批合并 · 范围逐项确认", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n1", + "type": "section", + "title": "项目背景", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-07/context" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n1a", + "type": "markdown", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-07/context" + ], + "markdown": "把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套，预算上限 40 万，期望 Q1 上线。" + }, + { + "id": "n1b", + "type": "kv", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-07/context" + ], + "kv": [ + [ + "合并目标", + "两套并行审批系统 → 一套" + ], + [ + "预算上限", + "40 万" + ], + [ + "目标上线", + "Q1" + ] + ] + }, + { + "id": "n1c", + "type": "doc-ref", + "docId": "req:eval/ri-07/context" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n2", + "type": "section", + "title": "干系人", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-07/context" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n2a", + "type": "list", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-07/context" + ], + "items": [ + "财务 — 审批人", + "行政 — 发起人", + "IT — 运维", + "法务 — 事后复核合同" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n3", + "type": "section", + "title": "已定约束", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-07/context" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n3a", + "type": "list", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-07/context" + ], + "items": [ + "保留移动端入口", + "审批链最多 5 级", + "历史数据只读归档", + "预算上限 40 万", + "期望 Q1 上线" + ] + }, + { + "id": "n3b", + "type": "doc-ref", + "docId": "req:eval/ri-07/context" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n4", + "type": "section", + "title": "待决事项 · 逐项确认", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-07/open" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n4a", + "type": "form", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-07/open" + ], + "fields": [ + { + "key": "concurrency_cap", + "label": "并发审批上限", + "type": "select", + "options": [ + "50", + "200" + ], + "required": true, + "help": "二选一，请确认。" + }, + { + "key": "acceptance_signer", + "label": "验收标准签署方", + "type": "select", + "options": [ + "财务", + "行政" + ], + "required": true, + "help": "由财务还是行政签署？" + }, + { + "key": "paper_fallback", + "label": "是否需要纸质兜底流程", + "type": "boolean", + "required": true, + "help": "行政坚持，IT 反对，见下方对照。" + }, + { + "key": "cross_quarter_cutover", + "label": "旧系统下线允许跨季度", + "type": "boolean", + "required": true, + "help": "若否，请指定本季度内窗口。" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n4b", + "type": "compare", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-07/open" + ], + "compare": { + "left": { + "title": "行政立场", + "tone": "info", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n4b1", + "type": "markdown", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-07/open" + ], + "markdown": "坚持：保留纸质兜底流程。" + } + ] + }, + "right": { + "title": "IT 立场", + "tone": "warn", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n4b2", + "type": "markdown", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-07/open" + ], + "markdown": "反对：不需要纸质兜底流程。" + } + ] + } + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n5", + "type": "section", + "title": "推进建议", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n5a", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "建议优先敲定并发上限与签署方（影响实现与合同条款），再处理纸质兜底冲突（建议拉一次 15 分钟对齐会，明确失效场景与责任归属），最后确定下线窗口。若下线跨季度，建议在合同里写明过渡期数据访问方式。" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n6", + "type": "actions", + "actions": [ + { + "id": "confirm_all", + "label": "确认本页所有项", + "style": "primary" + }, + { + "id": "schedule_meeting", + "label": "发起对齐会", + "style": "default" + } + ] + } + ] + }, + "stats_final": { + "nodes": 17, + "maxDepth": 3, + "types": [ + "section", + "markdown", + "kv", + "doc-ref", + "section", + "list", + "section", + "list", + "doc-ref", + "section", + "form", + "compare", + "markdown", + "markdown", + "section", + "markdown", + "actions" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "req:eval/ri-07/context", + "req:eval/ri-07/open" + ], + "idsProvided": 17 + }, + "wall_s": 106.9 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-09.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-09.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..ceb8a602 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-09.json @@ -0,0 +1,189 @@ +{ + "task": "ri-09", + "family": "requirement-input", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "collect", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 3612, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 976, + "completion_tokens": 2636, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 2145 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 17.39 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"待决问题收集表\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"项目背景摘要\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-08/context\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-08/context\"],\"kv\":[[\"目标\",\"合并两套并行审批系统为一套\"],[\"预算上限\",\"40 万\"],[\"期望上线\",\"Q1\"],[\"干系人\",\"财务（审批人）/ 行政（发起人）/ IT（运维）/ 法务（事后复核合同）\"],[\"已定约束\",\"保留移动端入口；审批链最多 5 级；历史数据只读归档\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"请填写以下待决问题\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-08/open\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"form\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-08/open\"],\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"legacy_cutover_cross_quarter\",\"label\":\"旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度？\",\"type\":\"boolean\",\"required\":true,\"help\":\"默认建议不允许跨季度；如选是请在备注补充理由\"},{\"key\":\"archive_years\",\"label\":\"归档年限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"3 年\",\"5 年\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"需结合合规要求与存储成本综合评估\"},{\"key\":\"vendor_onsite_required\",\"label\":\"供应商是否要求驻场实施？\",\"type\":\"boolean\",\"required\":true,\"help\":\"如选是，请补充驻场人数与周期\"},{\"key\":\"paper_fallback_required\",\"label\":\"是否需要纸质兜底流程？\",\"type\":\"boolean\",\"required\":true,\"help\":\"存在分歧：行政坚持需要，IT 反对；请注明最终决策与依据\"},{\"key\":\"remarks\",\"label\":\"其他补充说明\",\"type\":\"textarea\",\"required\":false,\"placeholder\":\"如有附加约束、例外或备注，请在此说明\"}]}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"提示：纸质兜底与跨季度下线两项干系人分歧较大，建议收集完后再单独组织一次评审拍板，避免在本表内反复拉扯。\"},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"submit_decisions\",\"label\":\"提交决策\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"save_draft\",\"label\":\"保存草稿\",\"style\":\"default\"}]}]}", + "valid_first": true, + "errors_first": [], + "stats_first": { + "nodes": 6, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "kv", + "section", + "form", + "markdown", + "actions" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "req:eval/ri-08/context", + "req:eval/ri-08/open" + ], + "unknownRefs": [] + }, + "repaired": false, + "valid_final": true, + "errors_final": [], + "spec": { + "title": "待决问题收集表", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n1", + "type": "section", + "title": "项目背景摘要", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-08/context" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n1a", + "type": "kv", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-08/context" + ], + "kv": [ + [ + "目标", + "合并两套并行审批系统为一套" + ], + [ + "预算上限", + "40 万" + ], + [ + "期望上线", + "Q1" + ], + [ + "干系人", + "财务（审批人）/ 行政（发起人）/ IT（运维）/ 法务（事后复核合同）" + ], + [ + "已定约束", + "保留移动端入口；审批链最多 5 级；历史数据只读归档" + ] + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n2", + "type": "section", + "title": "请填写以下待决问题", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-08/open" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n2a", + "type": "form", + "source": [ + "req:eval/ri-08/open" + ], + "fields": [ + { + "key": "legacy_cutover_cross_quarter", + "label": "旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度？", + "type": "boolean", + "required": true, + "help": "默认建议不允许跨季度；如选是请在备注补充理由" + }, + { + "key": "archive_years", + "label": "归档年限", + "type": "select", + "options": [ + "3 年", + "5 年" + ], + "required": true, + "help": "需结合合规要求与存储成本综合评估" + }, + { + "key": "vendor_onsite_required", + "label": "供应商是否要求驻场实施？", + "type": "boolean", + "required": true, + "help": "如选是，请补充驻场人数与周期" + }, + { + "key": "paper_fallback_required", + "label": "是否需要纸质兜底流程？", + "type": "boolean", + "required": true, + "help": "存在分歧：行政坚持需要，IT 反对；请注明最终决策与依据" + }, + { + "key": "remarks", + "label": "其他补充说明", + "type": "textarea", + "required": false, + "placeholder": "如有附加约束、例外或备注，请在此说明" + } + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n3", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "提示：纸质兜底与跨季度下线两项干系人分歧较大，建议收集完后再单独组织一次评审拍板，避免在本表内反复拉扯。" + }, + { + "id": "n4", + "type": "actions", + "actions": [ + { + "id": "submit_decisions", + "label": "提交决策", + "style": "primary" + }, + { + "id": "save_draft", + "label": "保存草稿", + "style": "default" + } + ] + } + ] + }, + "stats_final": { + "nodes": 6, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "kv", + "section", + "form", + "markdown", + "actions" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "req:eval/ri-08/context", + "req:eval/ri-08/open" + ], + "idsProvided": 6 + }, + "wall_s": 17.4 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-10.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-10.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..9a9a6d11 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/ri-10.json @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +{ + "task": "ri-10", + "family": "requirement-input", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "confirm", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 5500, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 972, + "completion_tokens": 4528, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 41.74 + }, + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 6413, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1021, + "completion_tokens": 5392, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 0 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 768 + } + }, + "latency_s": 42.12 + } + ], + "callCount": 2, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"审批系统合并项目 · 范围确认页\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"项目背景\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/context\"],\"kv\":[[\"合并目标\",\"将两套并行内部审批系统合并为一套\"],[\"预算上限\",\"40 万元\"],[\"上线目标\",\"Q1\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"干系人\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/context\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"avatar\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/context\"],\"avatar\":{\"name\":\"财务\",\"sub\":\"审批人\",\"tone\":\"info\"}},{\"id\":\"n2b\",\"type\":\"avatar\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/context\"],\"avatar\":{\"name\":\"行政\",\"sub\":\"发起人\",\"tone\":\"info\"}},{\"id\":\"n2c\",\"type\":\"avatar\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/context\"],\"avatar\":{\"name\":\"IT\",\"sub\":\"运维\",\"tone\":\"info\"}},{\"id\":\"n2d\",\"type\":\"avatar\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/context\"],\"avatar\":{\"name\":\"法务\",\"sub\":\"合同事后复核\",\"tone\":\"info\"}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"已定约束\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/context\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"list\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/context\"],\"items\":[\"保留移动端入口\",\"审批链最多 5 级\",\"历史数据只读归档\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"待决事项需要逐项拍板。归档年限影响存储成本与合规暴露面；并发上限影响架构容量与压测设计；纸质兜底是连续性与流程负担的争议点；供应商是否驻场直接影响预算与人天安排。建议先看下一节一览，再进入表单逐项确认。\"},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"待决事项一览\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/open\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n5a\",\"type\":\"table\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/open\"],\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"topic\",\"label\":\"议题\"},{\"key\":\"options\",\"label\":\"备选\"},{\"key\":\"stance\",\"label\":\"当前立场\"}],\"rows\":[{\"cells\":[[\"topic\",\"归档年限\"],[\"options\",\"3 年 / 5 年\"],[\"stance\",\"未定\"]]},{\"cells\":[[\"topic\",\"并发审批上限\"],[\"options\",\"50 / 200\"],[\"stance\",\"未定\"]]},{\"cells\":[[\"topic\",\"纸质兜底流程\"],[\"options\",\"需要 / 不需要\"],[\"stance\",\"行政坚持；IT 反对\"]]},{\"cells\":[[\"topic\",\"供应商驻场实施\"],[\"options\",\"需要 / 不需要\"],[\"stance\",\"未定\"]]}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n6\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"逐项确认\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/open\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n6a\",\"type\":\"form\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/open\"],\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"retention_years\",\"label\":\"归档年限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"3 年\",\"5 年\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"历史数据只读归档的保留期限\"},{\"key\":\"concurrency_cap\",\"label\":\"并发审批上限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"50\",\"200\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"影响系统容量与压测设计\"},{\"key\":\"paper_fallback\",\"label\":\"是否保留纸质兜底流程\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"需要\",\"不需要\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"行政坚持，IT 反对，需最终拍板\"},{\"key\":\"vendor_onsite\",\"label\":\"供应商是否驻场实施\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"需要驻场\",\"远程实施\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"影响预算与人天安排\"}]}]},{\"id\":\"n7\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"确认与下一步\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n7a\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"confirm_scope\",\"label\":\"提交范围确认\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"revisit_constraints\",\"label\":\"修订已定约束\"},{\"id\":\"escalate_paper\",\"label\":\"升级争议项（纸质兜底）\",\"style\":\"danger\"}]}}]}", + "valid_first": false, + "errors_first": [ + "JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 2593 (char 2592)" + ], + "stats_first": null, + "raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"内部审批合并 · 范围确认页\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"项目背景与目标\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"合并对象\",\"两套并行审批系统 → 一套统一系统\"],[\"预算上限\",\"40 万\"],[\"目标上线\",\"Q1\"],[\"合同复核\",\"法务事后复核合同\"]],\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/context\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"干系人\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"list\",\"items\":[\"财务（审批人）\",\"行政（发起人）\",\"IT（运维）\",\"法务（合同复核，事后）\"],\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/context\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"已定约束（确认即可）\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"table\",\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"k\",\"label\":\"约束项\"},{\"key\":\"v\",\"label\":\"已定结论\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"r1\",\"cells\":[[\"k\",\"移动端入口\"],[\"v\",\"保留\"]]},{\"id\":\"r2\",\"cells\":[[\"k\",\"审批链最大层级\"],[\"v\",\"5 级\"]]},{\"id\":\"r3\",\"cells\":[[\"k\",\"历史数据\"],[\"v\",\"只读归档\"]]},{\"id\":\"r4\",\"cells\":[[\"k\",\"预算上限\"],[\"v\",\"40 万\"]]},{\"id\":\"r5\",\"cells\":[[\"k\",\"上线目标\"],[\"v\",\"Q1\"]]}]},\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/context\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"待决事项（逐项确认）\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"form\",\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"archive_years\",\"label\":\"归档年限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"3 年\",\"5 年\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"历史数据只读归档需存几年？候选 3 / 5。\",\"default\":\"3 年\"},{\"key\":\"concurrency_limit\",\"label\":\"并发审批上限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"50\",\"200\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"系统同时处理审批的峰值能力。\",\"default\":\"50\"},{\"key\":\"paper_fallback\",\"label\":\"纸质兜底流程\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"需要（行政立场）\",\"不需要（IT 立场）\",\"折中：仅异常场景启用\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"行政坚持、IT 反对，需用户拍板。\",\"default\":\"折中：仅异常场景启用\"},{\"key\":\"vendor_onsite\",\"label\":\"供应商驻场实施\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"必须驻场\",\"远程实施\",\"混合：关键节点驻场\"],\"required\":true,\"default\":\"混合：关键节点驻场\"}],\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/open\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"确认操作\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n5a\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"a_confirm\",\"label\":\"确认已定 + 提交待决\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"a_discuss\",\"label\":\"拉会讨论冲突项\",\"style\":\"default\"},{\"id\":\"a_revise\",\"label\":\"回退修订材料\",\"style\":\"danger\"}]}}]}", + "repaired": true, + "valid_final": false, + "errors_final": [ + "JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 1850 (char 1849)" + ], + "spec": null, + "wall_s": 83.9 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-01.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-01.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..5e89c7cb --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-01.json @@ -0,0 +1,194 @@ +{ + "task": "to-01", + "family": "task-overview", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "progress", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 3011, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1014, + "completion_tokens": 1997, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 0 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 0 + } + }, + "latency_s": 13.98 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"任务进度：交付门禁自动化\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"当前进度\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-00/steps\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-00/steps\"],\"steps\":{\"current\":2,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"需求冻结\",\"status\":\"done\"},{\"label\":\"契约定义\",\"status\":\"done\"},{\"label\":\"存储迁移\",\"status\":\"active\"},{\"label\":\"灰度开关\",\"status\":\"pending\"},{\"label\":\"回退演练\",\"status\":\"pending\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"最近动态\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-00/log\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"timeline\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-00/log\"],\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"存储迁移脚本在预发跑通，耗时 14m\",\"time\":\"10-08 09:12\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"title\":\"灰度开关等待安全评审排期\",\"time\":\"10-09 15:40\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"回退演练草案提交，缺少数据校验步骤\",\"time\":\"10-10 11:05\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订\",\"time\":\"10-11 10:30\",\"tone\":\"ok\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"产物\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-00/artifacts\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"list\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-00/artifacts\"],\"items\":[\"需求清单 v3\",\"迁移脚本 runbook\",\"评审纪要 10-11\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"下一步建议\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"基于当前状态，建议优先处理两件事：\\n\\n1. **推进灰度开关**：存储迁移已在预发跑通，安全评审排期是当前的关键瓶颈，建议主动跟进评审时间窗，避免在迁移完成后空等；\\n2. **补齐回退演练**：草案已提交但缺数据校验步骤，建议先补充校验用例与回退判定标准，再走评审。\\n\\n契约定义刚于 10-11 通过评审（含两处字段口径修订），建议先稳定观察一至两个发布周期，再启动灰度开关落地。\"}]}]}", + "valid_first": true, + "errors_first": [], + "stats_first": { + "nodes": 8, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "steps", + "section", + "timeline", + "section", + "list", + "section", + "markdown" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "task:eval/to-00/artifacts", + "task:eval/to-00/log", + "task:eval/to-00/steps" + ], + "unknownRefs": [] + }, + "repaired": false, + "valid_final": true, + "errors_final": [], + "spec": { + "title": "任务进度：交付门禁自动化", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n1", + "type": "section", + "title": "当前进度", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-00/steps" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n1a", + "type": "steps", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-00/steps" + ], + "steps": { + "current": 2, + "steps": [ + { + "label": "需求冻结", + "status": "done" + }, + { + "label": "契约定义", + "status": "done" + }, + { + "label": "存储迁移", + "status": "active" + }, + { + "label": "灰度开关", + "status": "pending" + }, + { + "label": "回退演练", + "status": "pending" + } + ] + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n2", + "type": "section", + "title": "最近动态", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-00/log" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n2a", + "type": "timeline", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-00/log" + ], + "timeline": { + "items": [ + { + "title": "存储迁移脚本在预发跑通，耗时 14m", + "time": "10-08 09:12", + "tone": "ok" + }, + { + "title": "灰度开关等待安全评审排期", + "time": "10-09 15:40", + "tone": "warn" + }, + { + "title": "回退演练草案提交，缺少数据校验步骤", + "time": "10-10 11:05", + "tone": "warn" + }, + { + "title": "契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订", + "time": "10-11 10:30", + "tone": "ok" + } + ] + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n3", + "type": "section", + "title": "产物", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-00/artifacts" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n3a", + "type": "list", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-00/artifacts" + ], + "items": [ + "需求清单 v3", + "迁移脚本 runbook", + "评审纪要 10-11" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n4", + "type": "section", + "title": "下一步建议", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n4a", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "基于当前状态，建议优先处理两件事：\n\n1. **推进灰度开关**：存储迁移已在预发跑通，安全评审排期是当前的关键瓶颈，建议主动跟进评审时间窗，避免在迁移完成后空等；\n2. **补齐回退演练**：草案已提交但缺数据校验步骤，建议先补充校验用例与回退判定标准，再走评审。\n\n契约定义刚于 10-11 通过评审（含两处字段口径修订），建议先稳定观察一至两个发布周期，再启动灰度开关落地。" + } + ] + } + ] + }, + "stats_final": { + "nodes": 8, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "steps", + "section", + "timeline", + "section", + "list", + "section", + "markdown" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "task:eval/to-00/artifacts", + "task:eval/to-00/log", + "task:eval/to-00/steps" + ], + "idsProvided": 8 + }, + "wall_s": 14.0 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-02.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-02.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..c30b9c91 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-02.json @@ -0,0 +1,242 @@ +{ + "task": "to-02", + "family": "task-overview", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "risk", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 5191, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1020, + "completion_tokens": 4171, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 802 + } + }, + "latency_s": 40.84 + }, + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 5001, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1067, + "completion_tokens": 3934, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 802 + } + }, + "latency_s": 32.65 + } + ], + "callCount": 2, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"交付门禁自动化 · 风险与欠账视图\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"进度概览\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/steps\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/steps\"],\"steps\":{\"current\":2,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"需求冻结\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"契约定义\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"存储迁移\",\"status\":\"active\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"label\":\"灰度开关\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"label\":\"回退演练\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"danger\"}]}},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"当前仅 `存储迁移` 进行中，其余两项交付动作处于待启动状态；`灰度开关` 与 `回退演练` 均有外部依赖或前置条件未满足。\"}}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"风险登记\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/steps\",\"task:eval/to-01/log\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"table\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/steps\",\"task:eval/to-01/log\"],\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"item\",\"label\":\"风险项\"},{\"key\":\"severity\",\"label\":\"严重度\"},{\"key\":\"evidence\",\"label\":\"事实依据\"},{\"key\":\"status\",\"label\":\"当前状态\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"r1\",\"cells\":[[\"item\",\"灰度开关被安全评审排期阻塞\"],[\"severity\",\"高\"],[\"evidence\",\"10-09 安全评审未排期\"],[\"status\",\"未解除\"]]},{\"id\":\"r2\",\"cells\":[[\"item\",\"回退演练缺数据校验步骤\"],[\"severity\",\"高\"],[\"evidence\",\"10-10 草案被指出缺失\"],[\"status\",\"未补齐\"]]},{\"id\":\"r3\",\"cells\":[[\"item\",\"存储迁移仅完成预发验证\"],[\"severity\",\"中\"],[\"evidence\",\"10-08 预发跑通 14m，未见生产执行\"],[\"status\",\"进行中\"]]},{\"id\":\"r4\",\"cells\":[[\"item\",\"契约两处字段口径修订，回灌未确认\"],[\"severity\",\"中\"],[\"evidence\",\"10-11 评审通过同时修订两处\"],[\"status\",\"已落地待回归\"]]}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"欠账清单\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/log\",\"task:eval/to-01/artifacts\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"list\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/log\"],\"items\":[\"回退演练草案缺少数据校验步骤（10-10 提交版）\",\"灰度开关自 10-09 起等待安全评审排期，未确认窗口\",\"存储迁移缺生产环境执行记录，仅停留在预发验证\",\"契约定义 10-11 两处字段口径修订，未见对需求清单 v3 与迁移脚本 runbook 的回灌确认\",\"现有产物仅 3 份：需求清单 v3、迁移脚本 runbook、评审纪要 10-11，回退方案与数据校验单尚未形成正式 doc\"]}]}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"最近动态\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/log\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"timeline\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/log\"],\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"存储迁移脚本预发跑通，耗时 14m\",\"time\":\"10-08 09:12\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"title\":\"灰度开关等待安全评审排期\",\"time\":\"10-09 15:40\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"回退演练草案提交，缺数据校验步骤\",\"time\":\"10-10 11:05\",\"tone\":\"danger\"},{\"title\":\"契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订\",\"time\":\"10-11 10:30\",\"tone\":\"info\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"建议下一步（推断）\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n5a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**优先解除阻断（高风险两项）**\\n1. 推动安全评审排期，把 `灰度开关` 从 pending 推到 active，否则灰度路径不可启动。\\n2. 在回退演练草案中补齐 `数据校验步骤`，重提评审；这是交付门禁中失败代价最高的一环。\\n\\n**回灌与回归（口径漂移）**\\n3. 将 10-11 评审通过的两处字段口径修订回灌到 `需求清单 v3`、`迁移脚本 runbook`，并在评审纪要 10-11 中追加变更说明。\\n\\n**推进收口**\\n4. 安排存储迁移在生产环境执行窗口，并补齐生产执行的产物（执行报告、回放校验）。\\n\\n**观察**\\n- 风险登记中最久未更新的信号是 10-09 的安全评审，已 2 天未推进，需要主动升级。\\n- 当前产物偏轻，正式 doc 只有 3 份，建议把回退 runbook 与数据校验单也固化为 doc 产物。\"}}]}]}", + "valid_first": false, + "errors_first": [ + "JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 571 (char 570)" + ], + "stats_first": null, + "raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"交付门禁自动化 · 风险与欠账视图\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"任务概览\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/steps\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/steps\"],\"kv\":[[\"当前任务\",\"交付门禁自动化\"],[\"步骤总数\",\"5\"],[\"已完成\",\"2\"],[\"进行中\",\"1\"],[\"待开始\",\"2\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"步骤进度\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/steps\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/steps\"],\"steps\":{\"current\":2,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"需求冻结\",\"status\":\"done\"},{\"label\":\"契约定义\",\"status\":\"done\"},{\"label\":\"存储迁移\",\"status\":\"active\"},{\"label\":\"灰度开关\",\"status\":\"pending\"},{\"label\":\"回退演练\",\"status\":\"pending\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"风险时间线\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/log\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"timeline\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/log\"],\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"存储迁移脚本预发跑通\",\"time\":\"10-08 09:12\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"markdown\":\"耗时 14m\"},{\"title\":\"灰度开关等待安全评审排期\",\"time\":\"10-09 15:40\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"markdown\":\"评审尚未排期，是链路上的主要阻塞点\"},{\"title\":\"回退演练草案提交\",\"time\":\"10-10 11:05\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"markdown\":\"缺少数据校验步骤\"},{\"title\":\"契约定义评审通过\",\"time\":\"10-11 10:30\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"markdown\":\"同步修订两处字段口径\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"欠账与阻塞\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"综合判断：任务尚未过期，但存在三个明确欠账，按阻塞程度排序如下——\\n\\n1. 灰度开关等待安全评审——是链路上的卡点，没有评审排期就无法开启灰度，会影响整体节奏。\\n2. 回退演练缺数据校验——已知缺口，回退流程尚未闭环。\\n3. 存储迁移状态未关闭——虽已预发跑通，但步骤仍处于 in_progress，需持续关注进度。\\n\\n建议：优先催办安全评审排期，并在回退演练草案中补齐数据校验步骤。\"},{\"id\":\"n4b\",\"type\":\"list\",\"items\":[\"灰度开关：等待安全评审排期，无明确 ETA\",\"回退演练：缺数据校验步骤\",\"存储迁移：状态仍为 in_progress，未关闭\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"产物索引\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/artifacts\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n5a\",\"type\":\"list\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/artifacts\"],\"items\":[\"需求清单 v3（doc）\",\"迁移脚本 runbook（doc）\",\"评审纪要 10-11（doc）\"]}]}]}", + "repaired": true, + "valid_final": true, + "errors_final": [], + "spec": { + "title": "交付门禁自动化 · 风险与欠账视图", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n1", + "type": "section", + "title": "任务概览", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-01/steps" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n1a", + "type": "kv", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-01/steps" + ], + "kv": [ + [ + "当前任务", + "交付门禁自动化" + ], + [ + "步骤总数", + "5" + ], + [ + "已完成", + "2" + ], + [ + "进行中", + "1" + ], + [ + "待开始", + "2" + ] + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n2", + "type": "section", + "title": "步骤进度", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-01/steps" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n2a", + "type": "steps", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-01/steps" + ], + "steps": { + "current": 2, + "steps": [ + { + "label": "需求冻结", + "status": "done" + }, + { + "label": "契约定义", + "status": "done" + }, + { + "label": "存储迁移", + "status": "active" + }, + { + "label": "灰度开关", + "status": "pending" + }, + { + "label": "回退演练", + "status": "pending" + } + ] + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n3", + "type": "section", + "title": "风险时间线", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-01/log" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n3a", + "type": "timeline", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-01/log" + ], + "timeline": { + "items": [ + { + "title": "存储迁移脚本预发跑通", + "time": "10-08 09:12", + "tone": "ok", + "markdown": "耗时 14m" + }, + { + "title": "灰度开关等待安全评审排期", + "time": "10-09 15:40", + "tone": "warn", + "markdown": "评审尚未排期，是链路上的主要阻塞点" + }, + { + "title": "回退演练草案提交", + "time": "10-10 11:05", + "tone": "warn", + "markdown": "缺少数据校验步骤" + }, + { + "title": "契约定义评审通过", + "time": "10-11 10:30", + "tone": "ok", + "markdown": "同步修订两处字段口径" + } + ] + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n4", + "type": "section", + "title": "欠账与阻塞", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n4a", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "综合判断：任务尚未过期，但存在三个明确欠账，按阻塞程度排序如下——\n\n1. 灰度开关等待安全评审——是链路上的卡点，没有评审排期就无法开启灰度，会影响整体节奏。\n2. 回退演练缺数据校验——已知缺口，回退流程尚未闭环。\n3. 存储迁移状态未关闭——虽已预发跑通，但步骤仍处于 in_progress，需持续关注进度。\n\n建议：优先催办安全评审排期，并在回退演练草案中补齐数据校验步骤。" + }, + { + "id": "n4b", + "type": "list", + "items": [ + "灰度开关：等待安全评审排期，无明确 ETA", + "回退演练：缺数据校验步骤", + "存储迁移：状态仍为 in_progress，未关闭" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n5", + "type": "section", + "title": "产物索引", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-01/artifacts" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n5a", + "type": "list", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-01/artifacts" + ], + "items": [ + "需求清单 v3（doc）", + "迁移脚本 runbook（doc）", + "评审纪要 10-11（doc）" + ] + } + ] + } + ] + }, + "stats_final": { + "nodes": 11, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "kv", + "section", + "steps", + "section", + "timeline", + "section", + "markdown", + "list", + "section", + "list" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "task:eval/to-01/artifacts", + "task:eval/to-01/log", + "task:eval/to-01/steps" + ], + "idsProvided": 11 + }, + "wall_s": 73.5 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-03.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-03.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..392f6c3f --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-03.json @@ -0,0 +1,261 @@ +{ + "task": "to-03", + "family": "task-overview", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "handover", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 3416, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1019, + "completion_tokens": 2397, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 0 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 768 + } + }, + "latency_s": 22.37 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"交接页：交付门禁自动化\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"任务背景\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-02/artifacts\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"目标是把当前人工执行的交付门禁流程改造为可灰度、可回退的自动化链路。已沉淀需求清单、迁移 runbook 与 10-11 评审纪要三份产物，供接手人快速建立上下文。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"当前进度\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-02/steps\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"steps\":{\"current\":2,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"需求冻结\",\"status\":\"done\"},{\"label\":\"契约定义\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"存储迁移\",\"status\":\"active\"},{\"label\":\"灰度开关\",\"status\":\"pending\"},{\"label\":\"回退演练\",\"status\":\"pending\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"最近动态\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-02/log\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"timeline\",\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"存储迁移脚本预发跑通\",\"time\":\"10-08 09:12\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"markdown\":\"耗时 14 分钟\"},{\"title\":\"灰度开关等待安全评审排期\",\"time\":\"10-09 15:40\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"markdown\":\"阻塞项\"},{\"title\":\"回退演练草案提交\",\"time\":\"10-10 11:05\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"markdown\":\"缺少数据校验步骤\"},{\"title\":\"契约定义评审通过\",\"time\":\"10-11 10:30\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"markdown\":\"两处字段口径已修订\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"状态判断\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**进展面**：前两步已正式关闭，存储迁移在预发环境验证通过，契约字段口径已与评审结论对齐。\\n\\n**风险面**：灰度开关卡在安全评审排期，回退演练草案缺数据校验步骤，存在“先发后补”风险。建议优先补齐回退演练再推动灰度窗口。\\n\\n**接手优先级**：① 补全回退演练 → ② 推动安全评审 → ③ 推进存储迁移上生产。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"接手事项\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n5a\",\"type\":\"list\",\"items\":[\"跟进存储迁移从预发推进到生产，关注耗时波动与回滚条件\",\"推动灰度开关的安全评审排期，准备评审材料与开关策略说明\",\"补齐回退演练中的数据校验步骤，重新提交方案\",\"对照需求清单 v3 与最新契约，确认字段口径一致\",\"跟进 10-11 评审纪要中两处字段口径修订的落地情况\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n6\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"相关产物\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-02/artifacts\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n6a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"需求清单\",\"v3（doc）\"],[\"迁移脚本\",\"runbook（doc）\"],[\"评审纪要\",\"10-11（doc）\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"n7\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"a1\",\"label\":\"查看需求清单 v3\"},{\"id\":\"a2\",\"label\":\"查看迁移 runbook\"},{\"id\":\"a3\",\"label\":\"查看 10-11 评审纪要\",\"style\":\"primary\"}]}]}", + "valid_first": true, + "errors_first": [], + "stats_first": { + "nodes": 13, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "markdown", + "section", + "steps", + "section", + "timeline", + "section", + "markdown", + "section", + "list", + "section", + "kv", + "actions" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "task:eval/to-02/artifacts", + "task:eval/to-02/log", + "task:eval/to-02/steps" + ], + "unknownRefs": [] + }, + "repaired": false, + "valid_final": true, + "errors_final": [], + "spec": { + "title": "交接页：交付门禁自动化", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n1", + "type": "section", + "title": "任务背景", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-02/artifacts" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n1a", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "目标是把当前人工执行的交付门禁流程改造为可灰度、可回退的自动化链路。已沉淀需求清单、迁移 runbook 与 10-11 评审纪要三份产物，供接手人快速建立上下文。" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n2", + "type": "section", + "title": "当前进度", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-02/steps" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n2a", + "type": "steps", + "steps": { + "current": 2, + "steps": [ + { + "label": "需求冻结", + "status": "done" + }, + { + "label": "契约定义", + "status": "done", + "tone": "ok" + }, + { + "label": "存储迁移", + "status": "active" + }, + { + "label": "灰度开关", + "status": "pending" + }, + { + "label": "回退演练", + "status": "pending" + } + ] + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n3", + "type": "section", + "title": "最近动态", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-02/log" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n3a", + "type": "timeline", + "timeline": { + "items": [ + { + "title": "存储迁移脚本预发跑通", + "time": "10-08 09:12", + "tone": "ok", + "markdown": "耗时 14 分钟" + }, + { + "title": "灰度开关等待安全评审排期", + "time": "10-09 15:40", + "tone": "warn", + "markdown": "阻塞项" + }, + { + "title": "回退演练草案提交", + "time": "10-10 11:05", + "tone": "warn", + "markdown": "缺少数据校验步骤" + }, + { + "title": "契约定义评审通过", + "time": "10-11 10:30", + "tone": "ok", + "markdown": "两处字段口径已修订" + } + ] + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n4", + "type": "section", + "title": "状态判断", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n4a", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "**进展面**：前两步已正式关闭，存储迁移在预发环境验证通过，契约字段口径已与评审结论对齐。\n\n**风险面**：灰度开关卡在安全评审排期，回退演练草案缺数据校验步骤，存在“先发后补”风险。建议优先补齐回退演练再推动灰度窗口。\n\n**接手优先级**：① 补全回退演练 → ② 推动安全评审 → ③ 推进存储迁移上生产。" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n5", + "type": "section", + "title": "接手事项", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n5a", + "type": "list", + "items": [ + "跟进存储迁移从预发推进到生产，关注耗时波动与回滚条件", + "推动灰度开关的安全评审排期，准备评审材料与开关策略说明", + "补齐回退演练中的数据校验步骤，重新提交方案", + "对照需求清单 v3 与最新契约，确认字段口径一致", + "跟进 10-11 评审纪要中两处字段口径修订的落地情况" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n6", + "type": "section", + "title": "相关产物", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-02/artifacts" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n6a", + "type": "kv", + "kv": [ + [ + "需求清单", + "v3（doc）" + ], + [ + "迁移脚本", + "runbook（doc）" + ], + [ + "评审纪要", + "10-11（doc）" + ] + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n7", + "type": "actions", + "actions": [ + { + "id": "a1", + "label": "查看需求清单 v3" + }, + { + "id": "a2", + "label": "查看迁移 runbook" + }, + { + "id": "a3", + "label": "查看 10-11 评审纪要", + "style": "primary" + } + ] + } + ] + }, + "stats_final": { + "nodes": 13, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "markdown", + "section", + "steps", + "section", + "timeline", + "section", + "markdown", + "section", + "list", + "section", + "kv", + "actions" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "task:eval/to-02/artifacts", + "task:eval/to-02/log", + "task:eval/to-02/steps" + ], + "idsProvided": 13 + }, + "wall_s": 22.4 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-04.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-04.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..d8a57c2a --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-04.json @@ -0,0 +1,219 @@ +{ + "task": "to-04", + "family": "task-overview", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "progress", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 2674, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1014, + "completion_tokens": 1660, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 802 + } + }, + "latency_s": 15.93 + }, + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 4173, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1057, + "completion_tokens": 3116, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 807 + } + }, + "latency_s": 29.12 + } + ], + "callCount": 2, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"交付门禁自动化 · 进度概览\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n0\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"当前卡在 **存储迁移**（进行中，预发已跑通 14m），下一步推进 **灰度开关**（待安全评审排期）；**回退演练** 草案虽已提交，但缺数据校验步骤，建议先补齐再排正式演练。\"},{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"步骤状态\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-03/steps\"],\"steps\":{\"current\":2,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"需求冻结\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"契约定义\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"存储迁移\",\"status\":\"active\",\"tone\":\"info\"},{\"label\":\"灰度开关\",\"status\":\"pending\"},{\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"label\":\"回退演练\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"warn\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"最近动态\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"timeline\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-03/log\"],\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"存储迁移脚本在预发跑通\",\"time\":\"10-08 09:12\",\"markdown\":\"耗时 14m\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"title\":\"灰度开关等待安全评审排期\",\"time\":\"10-09 15:40\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"回退演练草案提交\",\"time\":\"10-10 11:05\",\"markdown\":\"缺少数据校验步骤\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"契约定义评审通过\",\"time\":\"10-11 10:30\",\"markdown\":\"两处字段口径修订\",\"tone\":\"ok\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"产物\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n6\",\"type\":\"list\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-03/artifacts\"],\"items\":[\"需求清单 v3\",\"迁移脚本 runbook\",\"评审纪要 10-11\"]}]}]}", + "valid_first": false, + "errors_first": [ + "$/child: steps 需非空、current 在范围内、status 合法" + ], + "stats_first": { + "nodes": 7, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "markdown", + "section", + "steps", + "section", + "timeline", + "section", + "list" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "task:eval/to-03/artifacts", + "task:eval/to-03/log", + "task:eval/to-03/steps" + ], + "unknownRefs": [] + }, + "raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"交付门禁自动化 · 进度概览\",\"nodes\":[{\"type\":\"section\",\"id\":\"n1\",\"title\":\"进度\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-03/steps\"],\"children\":[{\"type\":\"steps\",\"id\":\"n1a\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-03/steps\"],\"steps\":{\"current\":2,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"需求冻结\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"契约定义\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"存储迁移\",\"status\":\"active\"},{\"label\":\"灰度开关\",\"status\":\"pending\"},{\"label\":\"回退演练\",\"status\":\"pending\"}]}},{\"type\":\"progress\",\"id\":\"n1b\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-03/steps\"],\"progress\":{\"label\":\"整体完成度\",\"value\":0.4}}]},{\"type\":\"section\",\"id\":\"n2\",\"title\":\"下一步\",\"children\":[{\"type\":\"markdown\",\"id\":\"n2a\",\"markdown\":\"当前卡在 **存储迁移**（脚本已预发跑通 14m）。两项待推动：① **灰度开关** 等安全评审排期；② **回退演练** 草案需补齐数据校验步骤。\"}]},{\"type\":\"section\",\"id\":\"n3\",\"title\":\"最近动态\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-03/log\"],\"children\":[{\"type\":\"timeline\",\"id\":\"n3a\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-03/log\"],\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"存储迁移脚本在预发跑通，耗时 14m\",\"time\":\"10-08 09:12\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"title\":\"灰度开关等待安全评审排期\",\"time\":\"10-09 15:40\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"回退演练草案提交，缺少数据校验步骤\",\"time\":\"10-10 11:05\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订\",\"time\":\"10-11 10:30\",\"tone\":\"ok\"}]}}]},{\"type\":\"section\",\"id\":\"n4\",\"title\":\"产物\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-03/artifacts\"],\"children\":[{\"type\":\"list\",\"id\":\"n4a\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-03/artifacts\"],\"items\":[\"需求清单 v3\",\"迁移脚本 runbook\",\"评审纪要 10-11\"]}]}]}", + "repaired": true, + "valid_final": true, + "errors_final": [], + "spec": { + "title": "交付门禁自动化 · 进度概览", + "nodes": [ + { + "type": "section", + "id": "n1", + "title": "进度", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-03/steps" + ], + "children": [ + { + "type": "steps", + "id": "n1a", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-03/steps" + ], + "steps": { + "current": 2, + "steps": [ + { + "label": "需求冻结", + "status": "done", + "tone": "ok" + }, + { + "label": "契约定义", + "status": "done", + "tone": "ok" + }, + { + "label": "存储迁移", + "status": "active" + }, + { + "label": "灰度开关", + "status": "pending" + }, + { + "label": "回退演练", + "status": "pending" + } + ] + } + }, + { + "type": "progress", + "id": "n1b", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-03/steps" + ], + "progress": { + "label": "整体完成度", + "value": 0.4 + } + } + ] + }, + { + "type": "section", + "id": "n2", + "title": "下一步", + "children": [ + { + "type": "markdown", + "id": "n2a", + "markdown": "当前卡在 **存储迁移**（脚本已预发跑通 14m）。两项待推动：① **灰度开关** 等安全评审排期；② **回退演练** 草案需补齐数据校验步骤。" + } + ] + }, + { + "type": "section", + "id": "n3", + "title": "最近动态", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-03/log" + ], + "children": [ + { + "type": "timeline", + "id": "n3a", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-03/log" + ], + "timeline": { + "items": [ + { + "title": "存储迁移脚本在预发跑通，耗时 14m", + "time": "10-08 09:12", + "tone": "ok" + }, + { + "title": "灰度开关等待安全评审排期", + "time": "10-09 15:40", + "tone": "warn" + }, + { + "title": "回退演练草案提交，缺少数据校验步骤", + "time": "10-10 11:05", + "tone": "warn" + }, + { + "title": "契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订", + "time": "10-11 10:30", + "tone": "ok" + } + ] + } + } + ] + }, + { + "type": "section", + "id": "n4", + "title": "产物", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-03/artifacts" + ], + "children": [ + { + "type": "list", + "id": "n4a", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-03/artifacts" + ], + "items": [ + "需求清单 v3", + "迁移脚本 runbook", + "评审纪要 10-11" + ] + } + ] + } + ] + }, + "stats_final": { + "nodes": 9, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "steps", + "progress", + "section", + "markdown", + "section", + "timeline", + "section", + "list" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "task:eval/to-03/artifacts", + "task:eval/to-03/log", + "task:eval/to-03/steps" + ], + "idsProvided": 9 + }, + "wall_s": 45.0 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-05.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-05.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..7f4553f9 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-05.json @@ -0,0 +1,340 @@ +{ + "task": "to-05", + "family": "task-overview", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "risk", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 7611, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1020, + "completion_tokens": 6591, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 5698 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 30.5 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"交付门禁自动化 · 风险与欠账视图\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"进度概览\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-04/steps\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-04/steps\"],\"steps\":{\"current\":2,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"需求冻结\",\"status\":\"done\"},{\"label\":\"契约定义\",\"status\":\"done\"},{\"label\":\"存储迁移\",\"status\":\"active\"},{\"label\":\"灰度开关\",\"status\":\"pending\"},{\"label\":\"回退演练\",\"status\":\"pending\"}]}},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"type\":\"progress\",\"progress\":{\"label\":\"整体完成度\",\"value\":0.4}}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"风险地图（按严重度）\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-04/log\",\"task:eval/to-04/steps\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"tree\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-04/log\",\"task:eval/to-04/steps\"],\"tree\":{\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"risk1\",\"label\":\"灰度开关阻塞：等待安全评审排期\",\"tone\":\"danger\",\"badge\":\"P0\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"risk1a\",\"label\":\"自 10-09 起排期未启动，阻塞灰度与上线推进\",\"tone\":\"warn\"}]},{\"id\":\"risk2\",\"label\":\"回退演练不完整：草案缺数据校验步骤\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"badge\":\"P1\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"risk2a\",\"label\":\"10-10 草案已提交，需补齐校验脚本与对账口径\",\"tone\":\"info\"}]},{\"id\":\"risk3\",\"label\":\"存储迁移仅预发验证\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"badge\":\"P2\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"risk3a\",\"label\":\"10-08 预发跑通 14m，正式环境与回归尚未执行\"}]}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"欠账清单（缺什么）\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-04/log\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"list\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-04/log\"],\"items\":[\"回退演练：补充数据校验步骤与对账口径（草案 10-10 提交）\",\"灰度开关：推动安全评审入场并明确排期（10-09 至今未启动）\",\"存储迁移：补齐正式环境执行结论与回归报告\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"停滞与过期项\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-04/log\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"timeline\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-04/log\"],\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"契约定义评审通过，含两处字段口径修订\",\"time\":\"10-11 10:30\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"title\":\"回退演练草案提交（缺数据校验）\",\"time\":\"10-10 11:05\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"灰度开关等待安全评审排期\",\"time\":\"10-09 15:40\",\"tone\":\"danger\"},{\"title\":\"存储迁移脚本预发跑通，耗时 14m\",\"time\":\"10-08 09:12\",\"tone\":\"info\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"产物索引\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-04/artifacts\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n5a\",\"type\":\"table\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-04/artifacts\"],\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"name\",\"label\":\"产物\"},{\"key\":\"type\",\"label\":\"类型\"}],\"rows\":[{\"cells\":[[\"name\",\"需求清单 v3\"],[\"type\",\"doc\"]]},{\"cells\":[[\"name\",\"迁移脚本 runbook\"],[\"type\",\"doc\"]]},{\"cells\":[[\"name\",\"评审纪要 10-11\"],[\"type\",\"doc\"]]}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n6\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"建议处置\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n6a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"优先推动安全评审入场以解除灰度阻塞（P0）；同时让迁移负责人补齐回退演练的数据校验脚本，避免上线时缺乏可靠回滚路径。存储迁移宜尽早安排正式环境执行窗口，缩短 P2 项的滞留时间。\"}]}]}", + "valid_first": true, + "errors_first": [], + "stats_first": { + "nodes": 13, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "steps", + "progress", + "section", + "tree", + "section", + "list", + "section", + "timeline", + "section", + "table", + "section", + "markdown" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "task:eval/to-04/artifacts", + "task:eval/to-04/log", + "task:eval/to-04/steps" + ], + "unknownRefs": [] + }, + "repaired": false, + "valid_final": true, + "errors_final": [], + "spec": { + "title": "交付门禁自动化 · 风险与欠账视图", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n1", + "type": "section", + "title": "进度概览", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-04/steps" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n1a", + "type": "steps", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-04/steps" + ], + "steps": { + "current": 2, + "steps": [ + { + "label": "需求冻结", + "status": "done" + }, + { + "label": "契约定义", + "status": "done" + }, + { + "label": "存储迁移", + "status": "active" + }, + { + "label": "灰度开关", + "status": "pending" + }, + { + "label": "回退演练", + "status": "pending" + } + ] + } + }, + { + "id": "n1b", + "type": "progress", + "progress": { + "label": "整体完成度", + "value": 0.4 + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n2", + "type": "section", + "title": "风险地图（按严重度）", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-04/log", + "task:eval/to-04/steps" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n2a", + "type": "tree", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-04/log", + "task:eval/to-04/steps" + ], + "tree": { + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "risk1", + "label": "灰度开关阻塞：等待安全评审排期", + "tone": "danger", + "badge": "P0", + "children": [ + { + "id": "risk1a", + "label": "自 10-09 起排期未启动，阻塞灰度与上线推进", + "tone": "warn" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "risk2", + "label": "回退演练不完整：草案缺数据校验步骤", + "tone": "warn", + "badge": "P1", + "children": [ + { + "id": "risk2a", + "label": "10-10 草案已提交，需补齐校验脚本与对账口径", + "tone": "info" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "risk3", + "label": "存储迁移仅预发验证", + "tone": "info", + "badge": "P2", + "children": [ + { + "id": "risk3a", + "label": "10-08 预发跑通 14m，正式环境与回归尚未执行" + } + ] + } + ] + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n3", + "type": "section", + "title": "欠账清单（缺什么）", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-04/log" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n3a", + "type": "list", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-04/log" + ], + "items": [ + "回退演练：补充数据校验步骤与对账口径（草案 10-10 提交）", + "灰度开关：推动安全评审入场并明确排期（10-09 至今未启动）", + "存储迁移：补齐正式环境执行结论与回归报告" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n4", + "type": "section", + "title": "停滞与过期项", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-04/log" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n4a", + "type": "timeline", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-04/log" + ], + "timeline": { + "items": [ + { + "title": "契约定义评审通过，含两处字段口径修订", + "time": "10-11 10:30", + "tone": "ok" + }, + { + "title": "回退演练草案提交（缺数据校验）", + "time": "10-10 11:05", + "tone": "warn" + }, + { + "title": "灰度开关等待安全评审排期", + "time": "10-09 15:40", + "tone": "danger" + }, + { + "title": "存储迁移脚本预发跑通，耗时 14m", + "time": "10-08 09:12", + "tone": "info" + } + ] + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n5", + "type": "section", + "title": "产物索引", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-04/artifacts" + ], + "children": [ + { + "id": "n5a", + "type": "table", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-04/artifacts" + ], + "table": { + "columns": [ + { + "key": "name", + "label": "产物" + }, + { + "key": "type", + "label": "类型" + } + ], + "rows": [ + { + "cells": [ + [ + "name", + "需求清单 v3" + ], + [ + "type", + "doc" + ] + ] + }, + { + "cells": [ + [ + "name", + "迁移脚本 runbook" + ], + [ + "type", + "doc" + ] + ] + }, + { + "cells": [ + [ + "name", + "评审纪要 10-11" + ], + [ + "type", + "doc" + ] + ] + } + ] + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n6", + "type": "section", + "title": "建议处置", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n6a", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "优先推动安全评审入场以解除灰度阻塞（P0）；同时让迁移负责人补齐回退演练的数据校验脚本，避免上线时缺乏可靠回滚路径。存储迁移宜尽早安排正式环境执行窗口，缩短 P2 项的滞留时间。" + } + ] + } + ] + }, + "stats_final": { + "nodes": 13, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "steps", + "progress", + "section", + "tree", + "section", + "list", + "section", + "timeline", + "section", + "table", + "section", + "markdown" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "task:eval/to-04/artifacts", + "task:eval/to-04/log", + "task:eval/to-04/steps" + ], + "idsProvided": 13 + }, + "wall_s": 30.5 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-06.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-06.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..4971004b --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-06.json @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ +{ + "task": "to-06", + "family": "task-overview", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "handover", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 10527, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1019, + "completion_tokens": 9508, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 92.62 + }, + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 8654, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1068, + "completion_tokens": 7586, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 65.34 + } + ], + "callCount": 2, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"交付门禁自动化 · 交接页\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"本页用于交接「交付门禁自动化」任务。已完成**需求冻结**与**契约定义**两项，当前推进到**存储迁移**阶段。接手同事请重点跟进后文标出的阻塞与待办。\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-05/steps\"]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"当前进度\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"steps\":{\"current\":2,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"需求冻结\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"契约定义\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"存储迁移\",\"status\":\"active\",\"tone\":\"info\"},{\"label\":\"灰度开关\",\"status\":\"pending\"},{\"label\":\"回退演练\",\"status\":\"pending\"}]},\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-05/steps\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"最近动态\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"timeline\",\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"存储迁移脚本预发跑通\",\"time\":\"10-08 09:12\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"markdown\":\"迁移脚本在预发环境跑通，耗时 14 分钟。\"},{\"title\":\"灰度开关等待安全评审排期\",\"time\":\"10-09 15:40\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"markdown\":\"依赖安全评审，目前尚未排期，存在阻塞。\"},{\"title\":\"回退演练草案提交（不完整）\",\"time\":\"10-10 11:05\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"markdown\":\"草案已提交，但缺少数据校验步骤。\"},{\"title\":\"契约定义评审通过\",\"time\":\"10-11 10:30\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"markdown\":\"两处字段口径已修订。\"}]},\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-05/log\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"风险与阻塞\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"table\",\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"item\",\"label\":\"事项\"},{\"key\":\"severity\",\"label\":\"严重度\"},{\"key\":\"note\",\"label\":\"依据\"}],\"rows\":[{\"cells\":[[\"item\",\"灰度开关安全评审\"],[\"severity\",\"高\"],[\"note\",\"10-09 仍在等排期\"]]},{\"cells\":[[\"item\",\"回退演练草案\"],[\"severity\",\"高\"],[\"note\",\"10-10 缺少数据校验步骤\"]]}]},\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-05/log\"]},{\"id\":\"n4b\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**接手判断**：上述两条均为高严重度阻塞，建议先推动灰度开关的安全评审排期，同时补全回退演练的数据校验步骤；预发环境的迁移结果不宜直接外推，进入灰度前应再跑一次正式环境验证。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"接手事项\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n5a\",\"type\":\"form\",\"form\":{\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"owner\",\"label\":\"接手人\",\"type\":\"text\",\"required\":true,\"placeholder\":\"请填写姓名\"},{\"key\":\"handoff_date\",\"label\":\"接手日期\",\"type\":\"text\",\"placeholder\":\"YYYY-MM-DD\"},{\"key\":\"safety_review_eta\",\"label\":\"安全评审期望日期\",\"type\":\"text\",\"placeholder\":\"YYYY-MM-DD\"},{\"key\":\"rollback_check_added\",\"label\":\"回退演练已补充数据校验\",\"type\":\"boolean\",\"default\":false},{\"key\":\"next_update\",\"label\":\"下次同步时间\",\"type\":\"text\",\"placeholder\":\"YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n6\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"关联产物\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n6a\",\"type\":\"doc-ref\",\"docId\":\"task:eval/to-05/artifacts\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-05/artifacts\"]},{\"id\":\"n6b\",\"type\":\"list\",\"items\":[\"需求清单 v3（doc）\",\"迁移脚本 runbook（doc）\",\"评审纪要 10-11（doc）\"]}]}]}", + "valid_first": false, + "errors_first": [ + "$/child: 类型 form 不允许字段 ['form']", + "$/child: form.fields 必须为非空数组" + ], + "stats_first": { + "nodes": 13, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "markdown", + "section", + "steps", + "section", + "timeline", + "section", + "table", + "markdown", + "section", + "form", + "section", + "doc-ref", + "list" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "task:eval/to-05/artifacts", + "task:eval/to-05/log", + "task:eval/to-05/steps" + ], + "unknownRefs": [] + }, + "raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"任务交接｜交付门禁自动化\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"背景说明\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-05/steps\",\"task:eval/to-05/artifacts\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-05/steps\",\"task:eval/to-05/artifacts\"],\"markdown\":\"「交付门禁自动化」围绕上线前各环节的硬性闸门——需求冻结、接口契约、底层存储迁移、灰度控制、回退演练——建立可重复执行的自动化能力，确保跨团队交付的一致性与可回退性。配套产物包括需求清单 v3、迁移脚本 runbook 与 10-11 评审纪要。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"当前进度\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-05/steps\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-05/steps\"],\"steps\":{\"current\":2,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"需求冻结\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"契约定义\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"存储迁移\",\"status\":\"active\",\"tone\":\"info\"},{\"label\":\"灰度开关\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"label\":\"回退演练\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"warn\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"关键动态\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-05/log\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"timeline\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-05/log\"],\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"存储迁移脚本在预发跑通，耗时 14m\",\"time\":\"10-08 09:12\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"title\":\"灰度开关等待安全评审排期\",\"time\":\"10-09 15:40\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"回退演练草案提交，缺少数据校验步骤\",\"time\":\"10-10 11:05\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订\",\"time\":\"10-11 10:30\",\"tone\":\"ok\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"阶段状态一览\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-05/steps\",\"task:eval/to-05/log\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"table\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-05/steps\",\"task:eval/to-05/log\"],\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"phase\",\"label\":\"阶段\"},{\"key\":\"status\",\"label\":\"状态\"},{\"key\":\"note\",\"label\":\"要点\"}],\"rows\":[{\"cells\":[[\"phase\",\"需求冻结\"],[\"status\",\"已完成\"],[\"note\",\"需求清单已固化在 v3\"]]},{\"cells\":[[\"phase\",\"契约定义\"],[\"status\",\"已完成\"],[\"note\",\"10-11 评审通过，修订两处字段口径\"]]},{\"cells\":[[\"phase\",\"存储迁移\"],[\"status\",\"进行中\"],[\"note\",\"预发跑通 14m，待生产验证\"]]},{\"cells\":[[\"phase\",\"灰度开关\"],[\"status\",\"未开始\"],[\"note\",\"等待安全评审排期\"]]},{\"cells\":[[\"phase\",\"回退演练\"],[\"status\",\"未开始\"],[\"note\",\"草案缺失数据校验步骤\"]]}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"风险与卡点\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n5a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-05/log\"],\"kv\":[[\"灰度开关\",\"等待安全评审排期（10-09 15:40）\"],[\"回退演练草案\",\"缺少数据校验步骤（10-10 11:05）\"],[\"存储迁移脚本\",\"仅在预发跑通，14m（10-08 09:12）\"],[\"契约定义\",\"已评审通过，但有两处字段口径修订（10-11 10:30）\"],[\"需求清单\",\"已固化 v3\"]]},{\"id\":\"n5b\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**接手建议（推断）**：回退演练草案的「数据校验」缺口是最薄弱环节，建议优先补齐，否则一旦真实触发回退可能产生数据不一致；灰度开关被安全评审阻塞，应主动锁定评审窗口，避免成为后续阻塞点；存储迁移目前仅预发数据，建议先以最小灰度在生产小流量实测，再决定扩量节奏。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n6\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"相关产物\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-05/artifacts\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n6a\",\"type\":\"doc-ref\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-05/artifacts\"],\"docId\":\"需求清单 v3\"},{\"id\":\"n6b\",\"type\":\"doc-ref\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-05/artifacts\"],\"docId\":\"迁移脚本 runbook\"},{\"id\":\"n6c\",\"type\":\"doc-ref\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-05/artifacts\"],\"docId\":\"评审纪要 10-11\"}]},{\"id\":\"n7\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"接手清单（推断）\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n7a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"- 先读「需求清单 v3」与「评审纪要 10-11」，弄清两处字段口径修订的具体来龙去脉\\n- 通读「迁移脚本 runbook」，标注预发→生产之间可能存在的差异点（参数、数据量、超时阈值）\\n- 跟进安全评审排期，把灰度开关的启动条件逐条登记成可触发的检查表\\n- 把回退演练草案补齐到含「数据校验」步骤的版本，并组织一次桌面演练\\n- 在生产以最小灰度跑一次迁移脚本，记录耗时、对账误差、回滚所需时间\"}]},{\"id\":\"n8\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"可执行操作\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n8a\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"ask-owner\",\"label\":\"联系交付负责人\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"ask-review\",\"label\":\"催办安全评审\",\"style\":\"default\"},{\"id\":\"ask-rollback\",\"label\":\"讨论回退演练补全\",\"style\":\"default\"}]}}]}]}", + "repaired": true, + "valid_final": false, + "errors_final": [ + "JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 3313 (char 3312)" + ], + "spec": null, + "wall_s": 158.0 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-07.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-07.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..f13a7c18 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-07.json @@ -0,0 +1,209 @@ +{ + "task": "to-07", + "family": "task-overview", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "progress", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 5106, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1014, + "completion_tokens": 4092, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 3580 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 30.98 + }, + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 7666, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1063, + "completion_tokens": 6603, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 5861 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 43.92 + } + ], + "callCount": 2, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"交付门禁自动化 · 进度速览\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"进度总览\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"progress\",\"progress\":{\"label\":\"整体完成 2/5\",\"value\":0.4},\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-06/steps\"]},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"steps\":{\"current\":2,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"需求冻结\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"契约定义\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"存储迁移\",\"status\":\"active\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"label\":\"灰度开关\",\"status\":\"pending\"},{\"label\":\"回退演练\",\"status\":\"pending\"}]},\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-06/steps\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"最近动态\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"timeline\",\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"存储迁移脚本预发跑通\",\"time\":\"10-08 09:12\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"markdown\":\"耗时 14m\"},{\"title\":\"灰度开关等待安全评审排期\",\"time\":\"10-09 15:40\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"回退演练草案提交\",\"time\":\"10-10 11:05\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"markdown\":\"缺少数据校验步骤\"},{\"title\":\"契约定义评审通过\",\"time\":\"10-11 10:30\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"markdown\":\"两处字段口径修订\"}]},\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-06/log\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"产物\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"list\",\"items\":[\"需求清单 v3（doc）\",\"迁移脚本 runbook（doc）\",\"评审纪要 10-11（doc）\"],\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-06/artifacts\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"下一步建议\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"1. **推进存储迁移收尾**：预发已跑通（14m），下一步推动生产环境执行并复核耗时是否在可接受范围。\\n2. **解锁灰度开关**：主动跟进安全评审排期，给出明确的预期上线时间，避免成为后续阻塞。\\n3. **补齐回退演练**：当前草案缺数据校验步骤，建议在定档演练前先补齐该环节。\"}}]}]}", + "valid_first": false, + "errors_first": [ + "JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 1370 (char 1369)" + ], + "stats_first": null, + "raw_repair": "{\n \"title\": \"交付门禁自动化 · 进度概览\",\n \"nodes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n1\",\n \"type\": \"section\",\n \"title\": \"当前进度\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n1a\",\n \"type\": \"steps\",\n \"steps\": {\n \"current\": 2,\n \"steps\": [\n {\"label\": \"需求冻结\", \"status\": \"done\", \"tone\": \"ok\"},\n {\"label\": \"契约定义\", \"status\": \"done\", \"tone\": \"ok\"},\n {\"label\": \"存储迁移\", \"status\": \"active\"},\n {\"label\": \"灰度开关\", \"status\": \"pending\"},\n {\"label\": \"回退演练\", \"status\": \"pending\"}\n ]\n },\n \"source\": [\"task:eval/to-06/steps\"]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n1b\",\n \"type\": \"markdown\",\n \"markdown\": \"已完成需求冻结与契约定义；存储迁移正在推进，灰度开关与回退演练尚未启动。\"\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n2\",\n \"type\": \"section\",\n \"title\": \"最近动态\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n2a\",\n \"type\": \"timeline\",\n \"timeline\": {\n \"items\": [\n {\"title\": \"存储迁移脚本在预发跑通，耗时 14m\", \"time\": \"10-08 09:12\", \"tone\": \"ok\"},\n {\"title\": \"灰度开关等待安全评审排期\", \"time\": \"10-09 15:40\", \"tone\": \"warn\"},\n {\"title\": \"回退演练草案提交，缺少数据校验步骤\", \"time\": \"10-10 11:05\", \"tone\": \"warn\"},\n {\"title\": \"契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订\", \"time\": \"10-11 10:30\", \"tone\": \"ok\"}\n ]\n },\n \"source\": [\"task:eval/to-06/log\"]\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n3\",\n \"type\": \"section\",\n \"title\": \"下一步建议\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n3a\",\n \"type\": \"markdown\",\n \"markdown\": \"建议优先处理：(1) 跟进灰度开关的安全评审排期，避免阻塞灰度上线；(2) 在回退演练草案中补齐数据校验步骤，确保演练结果可被验证。\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n3b\",\n \"type\": \"actions\",\n \"actions\": [\n {\"id\": \"act1\", \"label\": \"推进灰度安全评审\", \"style\": \"primary\"},\n {\"id\": \"act2\", \"label\": \"补齐回退数据校验\", \"style\": \"default\"}\n ]\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n4\",\n \"type\": \"section\",\n \"title\": \"相关产物\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n4a\",\n \"type\": \"list\",\n \"items\": [\"需求清单 v3（doc）\", \"迁移脚本 runbook（doc）\", \"评审纪要 10-11（doc）\"],\n \"source\": [\"task:eval/to-06/artifacts\"]\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n}", + "repaired": true, + "valid_final": true, + "errors_final": [], + "spec": { + "title": "交付门禁自动化 · 进度概览", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n1", + "type": "section", + "title": "当前进度", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n1a", + "type": "steps", + "steps": { + "current": 2, + "steps": [ + { + "label": "需求冻结", + "status": "done", + "tone": "ok" + }, + { + "label": "契约定义", + "status": "done", + "tone": "ok" + }, + { + "label": "存储迁移", + "status": "active" + }, + { + "label": "灰度开关", + "status": "pending" + }, + { + "label": "回退演练", + "status": "pending" + } + ] + }, + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-06/steps" + ] + }, + { + "id": "n1b", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "已完成需求冻结与契约定义；存储迁移正在推进，灰度开关与回退演练尚未启动。" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n2", + "type": "section", + "title": "最近动态", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n2a", + "type": "timeline", + "timeline": { + "items": [ + { + "title": "存储迁移脚本在预发跑通，耗时 14m", + "time": "10-08 09:12", + "tone": "ok" + }, + { + "title": "灰度开关等待安全评审排期", + "time": "10-09 15:40", + "tone": "warn" + }, + { + "title": "回退演练草案提交，缺少数据校验步骤", + "time": "10-10 11:05", + "tone": "warn" + }, + { + "title": "契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订", + "time": "10-11 10:30", + "tone": "ok" + } + ] + }, + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-06/log" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n3", + "type": "section", + "title": "下一步建议", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n3a", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "建议优先处理：(1) 跟进灰度开关的安全评审排期，避免阻塞灰度上线；(2) 在回退演练草案中补齐数据校验步骤，确保演练结果可被验证。" + }, + { + "id": "n3b", + "type": "actions", + "actions": [ + { + "id": "act1", + "label": "推进灰度安全评审", + "style": "primary" + }, + { + "id": "act2", + "label": "补齐回退数据校验", + "style": "default" + } + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n4", + "type": "section", + "title": "相关产物", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n4a", + "type": "list", + "items": [ + "需求清单 v3（doc）", + "迁移脚本 runbook（doc）", + "评审纪要 10-11（doc）" + ], + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-06/artifacts" + ] + } + ] + } + ] + }, + "stats_final": { + "nodes": 10, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "steps", + "markdown", + "section", + "timeline", + "section", + "markdown", + "actions", + "section", + "list" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "task:eval/to-06/artifacts", + "task:eval/to-06/log", + "task:eval/to-06/steps" + ], + "idsProvided": 10 + }, + "wall_s": 74.9 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-08.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-08.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..76521601 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-08.json @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +{ + "task": "to-08", + "family": "task-overview", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "risk", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 6083, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1020, + "completion_tokens": 5063, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 3845 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 28.56 + }, + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 9037, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1069, + "completion_tokens": 7968, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 65.19 + } + ], + "callCount": 2, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"交付门禁自动化 · 风险与欠账视图\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"任务进度概览\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/steps\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/steps\"],\"steps\":{\"current\":2,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"需求冻结\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"契约定义\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"存储迁移\",\"status\":\"active\",\"tone\":\"info\"},{\"label\":\"灰度开关\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"label\":\"回退演练\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"danger\"}]}},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**研判**：从当前步骤依赖看，灰度开关是收尾推进中的最大不确定项；建议优先打通评审排期并补齐回退演练缺口。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"风险与欠账清单\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/steps\",\"task:eval/to-07/log\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"table\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/steps\",\"task:eval/to-07/log\"],\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"item\",\"label\":\"条目\"},{\"key\":\"status\",\"label\":\"状态\"},{\"key\":\"issue\",\"label\":\"卡点 / 欠账\"},{\"key\":\"severity\",\"label\":\"严重度\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"r1\",\"cells\":[[\"item\",\"灰度开关\"],[\"status\",\"pending\"],[\"issue\",\"等待安全评审排期，自 10-09 起无后续进展\"],[\"severity\",\"高 · 关键路径阻塞\"]]},{\"id\":\"r2\",\"cells\":[[\"item\",\"回退演练\"],[\"status\",\"pending\"],[\"issue\",\"草案已提交但缺少数据校验步骤\"],[\"severity\",\"高 · 欠账影响回退可靠性\"]]},{\"id\":\"r3\",\"cells\":[[\"item\",\"存储迁移\"],[\"status\",\"in_progress\"],[\"issue\",\"预发已跑通（耗时 14m），尚未正式上线收口，依赖灰度开关\"],[\"severity\",\"中 · 间接阻塞\"]]},{\"id\":\"r4\",\"cells\":[[\"item\",\"契约定义\"],[\"status\",\"done\"],[\"issue\",\"10-11 评审通过但两处字段口径已修订，下游消费方需复核\"],[\"severity\",\"中 · 潜在回归\"]]}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"风险归类\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/steps\",\"task:eval/to-07/log\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/steps\",\"task:eval/to-07/log\"],\"kv\":[[\"关键路径阻塞\",\"灰度开关 → 等待安全评审排期（10-09）\"],[\"欠账·校验缺失\",\"回退演练草案缺少数据校验步骤（10-10）\"],[\"契约口径变更\",\"两处字段口径修订，需通知下游（10-11）\"],[\"迁移未收口\",\"预发跑通但 in_progress，未正式上线（10-08）\"],[\"潜在过期\",\"灰度开关自 10-09 起未见评审排期更新\"]]}},{\"id\":\"n3b\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**过期项判定**：材料中未给出明确截止日期，但灰度开关自 10-09 起超过 48 小时无进展，且直接阻塞存储迁移收尾与回退演练启动，按经验应视为潜在过期项，建议立即跟进。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"最近动态时间线\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/log\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"timeline\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/log\"],\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"存储迁移脚本预发跑通\",\"time\":\"10-08 09:12\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"markdown\":\"耗时 14m，预发环境验证通过。\"},{\"title\":\"灰度开关等待安全评审排期\",\"time\":\"10-09 15:40\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"markdown\":\"关键路径阻塞点。\"},{\"title\":\"回退演练草案提交\",\"time\":\"10-10 11:05\",\"tone\":\"danger\",\"markdown\":\"缺少数据校验步骤。\"},{\"title\":\"契约定义评审通过\",\"time\":\"10-11 10:30\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"markdown\":\"两处字段口径已修订。\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"关联产物\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/artifacts\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n5a\",\"type\":\"doc-ref\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/artifacts\"],\"docId\":\"需求清单 v3\"},{\"id\":\"n5b\",\"type\":\"doc-ref\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/artifacts\"],\"docId\":\"迁移脚本 runbook\"},{\"id\":\"n5c\",\"type\":\"doc-ref\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/artifacts\"],\"docId\":\"评审纪要 10-11\"}]},{\"id\":\"n6\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"推进建议（推断）\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n6a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"1. **立即**：推动灰度开关的安全评审排期，解除对存储迁移收尾与回退演练的关键路径阻塞。\\n2. **并行**：补齐回退演练的数据校验步骤（一致性比对、回滚后抽样验证），并补一次完整演练记录。\\n3. **预防**：在灰度评审通过前，先固化存储迁移的回滚脚本与上线检查单，降低上线风险。\\n4. **同步**：将 10-11 契约口径修订通知到所有下游消费方，避免集成回归。\"}]}]}]}", + "valid_first": false, + "errors_first": [ + "JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 1796 (char 1795)" + ], + "stats_first": null, + "raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"交付门禁自动化 · 风险与欠账视图\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"总览\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/steps\",\"task:eval/to-07/artifacts\"],\"kv\":[[\"任务\",\"交付门禁自动化\"],[\"已完成\",\"需求冻结、契约定义\"],[\"进行中\",\"存储迁移\"],[\"待启动\",\"灰度开关、回退演练\"],[\"关键阻塞\",\"灰度开关等安全评审排期\"],[\"关键欠账\",\"回退演练缺数据校验；契约两处字段口径待落地\"],[\"最新产物\",\"需求清单 v3、迁移脚本 runbook、评审纪要 10-11\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"步骤进度\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/steps\"],\"steps\":{\"current\":2,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"需求冻结\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"契约定义\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"存储迁移\",\"status\":\"active\"},{\"label\":\"灰度开关\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"label\":\"回退演练\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"danger\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"风险摘要\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/log\",\"task:eval/to-07/steps\"],\"markdown\":\"### 风险与欠账概述\\n\\n- **阻塞**：灰度开关等安全评审排期，未启动。依据 10-09 15:40。\\n- **缺陷**：回退演练草案已提交，但缺少数据校验步骤。依据 10-10 11:05。\\n- **欠账**：契约定义评审通过后遗留两处字段口径修订，未跟进落地。依据 10-11 10:30。\\n- **进行中**：存储迁移预发跑通 14m，尚未全量。依据 10-08 09:12。\"}]}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"风险与欠账明细\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"table\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/log\",\"task:eval/to-07/steps\"],\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"cat\",\"label\":\"类别\"},{\"key\":\"item\",\"label\":\"项\"},{\"key\":\"status\",\"label\":\"状态\"},{\"key\":\"detail\",\"label\":\"详情\"},{\"key\":\"evidence\",\"label\":\"依据\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"r1\",\"cells\":[[\"cat\",\"阻塞\"],[\"item\",\"灰度开关\"],[\"status\",\"pending\"],[\"detail\",\"等待安全评审排期\"],[\"evidence\",\"10-09 15:40\"]]},{\"id\":\"r2\",\"cells\":[[\"cat\",\"缺陷\"],[\"item\",\"回退演练\"],[\"status\",\"pending\"],[\"detail\",\"草案缺少数据校验步骤\"],[\"evidence\",\"10-10 11:05\"]]},{\"id\":\"r3\",\"cells\":[[\"cat\",\"欠账\"],[\"item\",\"契约字段口径\"],[\"status\",\"done→待落地\"],[\"detail\",\"评审通过后两处字段口径修订未跟进\"],[\"evidence\",\"10-11 10:30\"]]},{\"id\":\"r4\",\"cells\":[[\"cat\",\"进行中\"],[\"item\",\"存储迁移\"],[\"status\",\"active\"],[\"detail\",\"预发跑通 14m，待全量\"],[\"evidence\",\"10-08 09:12\"]]}]}}}]},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"近期动态\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n5a\",\"type\":\"timeline\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/log\"],\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"存储迁移脚本预发跑通 14m\",\"time\":\"10-08 09:12\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"title\":\"灰度开关等待安全评审排期\",\"time\":\"10-09 15:40\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"回退演练草案提交，缺少数据校验步骤\",\"time\":\"10-10 11:05\",\"tone\":\"danger\"},{\"title\":\"契约定义评审通过，遗留两处字段口径修订\",\"time\":\"10-11 10:30\",\"tone\":\"info\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n6\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"建议下一步\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n6a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"- 优先跟进安全评审排期，解除灰度开关阻塞\\n- 补全回退演练的数据校验前置与对照口径\\n- 锁定契约字段口径修订的落地窗口，避免影响后续迁移与灰度\\n- 存储迁移从预发向全量推进时同步保留回切预案\"}]}]},{\"id\":\"n7\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"可用产物\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n7a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/artifacts\"],\"markdown\":\"- 需求清单 v3（doc）\\n- 迁移脚本 runbook（doc）\\n- 评审纪要 10-11（doc）\"}]}]}]}", + "repaired": true, + "valid_final": false, + "errors_final": [ + "JSON 解析失败: Extra data: line 1 column 1097 (char 1096)" + ], + "spec": null, + "wall_s": 93.8 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-09.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-09.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..848c50fb --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-09.json @@ -0,0 +1,215 @@ +{ + "task": "to-09", + "family": "task-overview", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "handover", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 5120, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1019, + "completion_tokens": 4101, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 3482 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 128 + } + }, + "latency_s": 17.13 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"交付门禁自动化 · 交接页\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"项目背景\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"「交付门禁自动化」把发布前的检查、开关与回退统一为可编程流程。当前已完成需求冻结与契约定义，正在推进存储迁移；灰度开关与回退演练尚未启动。先读三份产物了解全貌，再按下方建议顺序接手。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"当前状态\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2b\",\"type\":\"progress\",\"progress\":{\"label\":\"整体进度（5 步中 2 步完成）\",\"value\":0.4},\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-08/steps\"]},{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"steps\":{\"current\":2,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"需求冻结\",\"status\":\"done\"},{\"label\":\"契约定义\",\"status\":\"done\"},{\"label\":\"存储迁移\",\"status\":\"active\"},{\"label\":\"灰度开关\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"label\":\"回退演练\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"danger\"}]},\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-08/steps\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"最近动态\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"timeline\",\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"存储迁移脚本在预发跑通，耗时 14m\",\"time\":\"10-08 09:12\"},{\"title\":\"灰度开关等待安全评审排期\",\"time\":\"10-09 15:40\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"回退演练草案提交，缺少数据校验步骤\",\"time\":\"10-10 11:05\",\"tone\":\"danger\"},{\"title\":\"契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订\",\"time\":\"10-11 10:30\",\"tone\":\"ok\"}]},\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-08/log\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"产物清单\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"list\",\"items\":[\"需求清单 v3（doc）\",\"迁移脚本 runbook（doc）\",\"评审纪要 10-11（doc）\"],\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-08/artifacts\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"接手事项与建议\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n5a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**建议优先顺序**\\n\\n1. 补齐回退演练的数据校验步骤——草案已提交但缺校验环节，是当前阻塞项。\\n2. 推动灰度开关的安全评审排期——目前在等他人排期，主动跟进能缩短关键路径。\\n3. 核对契约定义的字段口径——10-11 评审有两处修订，需同步到迁移脚本与下游消费者。\\n\\n**建议阅读顺序**：需求清单 v3 → 评审纪要 10-11 → 迁移脚本 runbook。\"}]}]}", + "valid_first": true, + "errors_first": [], + "stats_first": { + "nodes": 11, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "markdown", + "section", + "progress", + "steps", + "section", + "timeline", + "section", + "list", + "section", + "markdown" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "task:eval/to-08/artifacts", + "task:eval/to-08/log", + "task:eval/to-08/steps" + ], + "unknownRefs": [] + }, + "repaired": false, + "valid_final": true, + "errors_final": [], + "spec": { + "title": "交付门禁自动化 · 交接页", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n1", + "type": "section", + "title": "项目背景", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n1a", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "「交付门禁自动化」把发布前的检查、开关与回退统一为可编程流程。当前已完成需求冻结与契约定义，正在推进存储迁移；灰度开关与回退演练尚未启动。先读三份产物了解全貌，再按下方建议顺序接手。" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n2", + "type": "section", + "title": "当前状态", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n2b", + "type": "progress", + "progress": { + "label": "整体进度（5 步中 2 步完成）", + "value": 0.4 + }, + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-08/steps" + ] + }, + { + "id": "n2a", + "type": "steps", + "steps": { + "current": 2, + "steps": [ + { + "label": "需求冻结", + "status": "done" + }, + { + "label": "契约定义", + "status": "done" + }, + { + "label": "存储迁移", + "status": "active" + }, + { + "label": "灰度开关", + "status": "pending", + "tone": "warn" + }, + { + "label": "回退演练", + "status": "pending", + "tone": "danger" + } + ] + }, + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-08/steps" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n3", + "type": "section", + "title": "最近动态", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n3a", + "type": "timeline", + "timeline": { + "items": [ + { + "title": "存储迁移脚本在预发跑通，耗时 14m", + "time": "10-08 09:12" + }, + { + "title": "灰度开关等待安全评审排期", + "time": "10-09 15:40", + "tone": "warn" + }, + { + "title": "回退演练草案提交，缺少数据校验步骤", + "time": "10-10 11:05", + "tone": "danger" + }, + { + "title": "契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订", + "time": "10-11 10:30", + "tone": "ok" + } + ] + }, + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-08/log" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n4", + "type": "section", + "title": "产物清单", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n4a", + "type": "list", + "items": [ + "需求清单 v3（doc）", + "迁移脚本 runbook（doc）", + "评审纪要 10-11（doc）" + ], + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-08/artifacts" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n5", + "type": "section", + "title": "接手事项与建议", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n5a", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "**建议优先顺序**\n\n1. 补齐回退演练的数据校验步骤——草案已提交但缺校验环节，是当前阻塞项。\n2. 推动灰度开关的安全评审排期——目前在等他人排期，主动跟进能缩短关键路径。\n3. 核对契约定义的字段口径——10-11 评审有两处修订，需同步到迁移脚本与下游消费者。\n\n**建议阅读顺序**：需求清单 v3 → 评审纪要 10-11 → 迁移脚本 runbook。" + } + ] + } + ] + }, + "stats_final": { + "nodes": 11, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "markdown", + "section", + "progress", + "steps", + "section", + "timeline", + "section", + "list", + "section", + "markdown" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "task:eval/to-08/artifacts", + "task:eval/to-08/log", + "task:eval/to-08/steps" + ], + "idsProvided": 11 + }, + "wall_s": 17.1 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-10.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-10.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..c4d6f07f --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/G/to-10.json @@ -0,0 +1,192 @@ +{ + "task": "to-10", + "family": "task-overview", + "arm": "G", + "model": "MiniMax-M3", + "goalKind": "progress", + "calls": [ + { + "usage": { + "total_tokens": 2766, + "total_characters": 0, + "prompt_tokens": 1014, + "completion_tokens": 1752, + "completion_tokens_details": { + "reasoning_tokens": 0 + }, + "prompt_tokens_details": { + "cached_tokens": 768 + } + }, + "latency_s": 14.71 + } + ], + "callCount": 1, + "raw_first": "{\"title\":\"交付门禁自动化 · 进度一览\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"当前阶段\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-09/steps\"],\"steps\":{\"current\":2,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"需求冻结\",\"status\":\"done\"},{\"label\":\"契约定义\",\"status\":\"done\"},{\"label\":\"存储迁移\",\"status\":\"active\"},{\"label\":\"灰度开关\",\"status\":\"pending\"},{\"label\":\"回退演练\",\"status\":\"pending\"}]}},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**当前进行中：存储迁移**——预发已跑通（14m）。两个待办存在外部依赖与草案缺口：**灰度开关**等安全评审排期；**回退演练**草案缺数据校验步骤。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"最近动态\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"timeline\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-09/log\"],\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"存储迁移脚本预发跑通，耗时 14m\",\"time\":\"10-08 09:12\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"title\":\"灰度开关等待安全评审排期\",\"time\":\"10-09 15:40\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"回退演练草案提交，缺少数据校验步骤\",\"time\":\"10-10 11:05\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订\",\"time\":\"10-11 10:30\",\"tone\":\"ok\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"产物\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"list\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-09/artifacts\"],\"items\":[\"需求清单 v3（doc）\",\"迁移脚本 runbook（doc）\",\"评审纪要 10-11（doc）\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"下一步建议\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"1. **灰度开关**：主动跟进安全评审排期，避免成为唯一的卡点。\\n2. **回退演练**：先补齐数据校验步骤，再提交正式评审。\\n3. **契约修订**：10-11 评审已修订两处字段口径，记得同步到上下游服务与文档，避免口径漂移。\\n4. **存储迁移**：预发已跑通，可基于此结果准备灰度切换预案。\"}]}]}", + "valid_first": true, + "errors_first": [], + "stats_first": { + "nodes": 9, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "steps", + "markdown", + "section", + "timeline", + "section", + "list", + "section", + "markdown" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "task:eval/to-09/artifacts", + "task:eval/to-09/log", + "task:eval/to-09/steps" + ], + "unknownRefs": [] + }, + "repaired": false, + "valid_final": true, + "errors_final": [], + "spec": { + "title": "交付门禁自动化 · 进度一览", + "nodes": [ + { + "id": "n1", + "type": "section", + "title": "当前阶段", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n1a", + "type": "steps", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-09/steps" + ], + "steps": { + "current": 2, + "steps": [ + { + "label": "需求冻结", + "status": "done" + }, + { + "label": "契约定义", + "status": "done" + }, + { + "label": "存储迁移", + "status": "active" + }, + { + "label": "灰度开关", + "status": "pending" + }, + { + "label": "回退演练", + "status": "pending" + } + ] + } + }, + { + "id": "n1b", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "**当前进行中：存储迁移**——预发已跑通（14m）。两个待办存在外部依赖与草案缺口：**灰度开关**等安全评审排期；**回退演练**草案缺数据校验步骤。" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n2", + "type": "section", + "title": "最近动态", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n2a", + "type": "timeline", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-09/log" + ], + "timeline": { + "items": [ + { + "title": "存储迁移脚本预发跑通，耗时 14m", + "time": "10-08 09:12", + "tone": "ok" + }, + { + "title": "灰度开关等待安全评审排期", + "time": "10-09 15:40", + "tone": "warn" + }, + { + "title": "回退演练草案提交，缺少数据校验步骤", + "time": "10-10 11:05", + "tone": "warn" + }, + { + "title": "契约定义评审通过，两处字段口径修订", + "time": "10-11 10:30", + "tone": "ok" + } + ] + } + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n3", + "type": "section", + "title": "产物", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n3a", + "type": "list", + "source": [ + "task:eval/to-09/artifacts" + ], + "items": [ + "需求清单 v3（doc）", + "迁移脚本 runbook（doc）", + "评审纪要 10-11（doc）" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "n4", + "type": "section", + "title": "下一步建议", + "children": [ + { + "id": "n4a", + "type": "markdown", + "markdown": "1. **灰度开关**：主动跟进安全评审排期，避免成为唯一的卡点。\n2. **回退演练**：先补齐数据校验步骤，再提交正式评审。\n3. **契约修订**：10-11 评审已修订两处字段口径，记得同步到上下游服务与文档，避免口径漂移。\n4. **存储迁移**：预发已跑通，可基于此结果准备灰度切换预案。" + } + ] + } + ] + }, + "stats_final": { + "nodes": 9, + "maxDepth": 2, + "types": [ + "section", + "steps", + "markdown", + "section", + "timeline", + "section", + "list", + "section", + "markdown" + ], + "refsUsed": [ + "task:eval/to-09/artifacts", + "task:eval/to-09/log", + "task:eval/to-09/steps" + ], + "idsProvided": 9 + }, + "wall_s": 14.7 +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/results/summary.json b/.task/genui-u1/results/summary.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..d5aa1c6c --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/results/summary.json @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ +{ + "B": { + "arm": "B", + "tasks": 30, + "calls": 30, + "prompt_tok": 13565, + "completion_tok": 41000, + "cached_tok": 3456, + "cost_cny": 0.38, + "wall_s": 457.3, + "cost_cny_per_task": 0.013, + "markdown_pipe_table_on_compare": "3/3" + }, + "G": { + "arm": "G", + "tasks": 30, + "calls": 42, + "prompt_tok": 43717, + "completion_tok": 220981, + "cached_tok": 16391, + "cost_cny": 2.0, + "wall_s": 1766.1, + "cost_cny_per_task": 0.067, + "valid_first": "18/30 (60%)", + "valid_final": "25/30 (83%)", + "repaired": 12, + "structure_fit": 0.66, + "source_coverage": 0.87, + "ids_provided_tasks": 25 + }, + "G-hs": { + "arm": "G-hs", + "tasks": 10, + "calls": 20, + "prompt_tok": 18210, + "completion_tok": 24477, + "cached_tok": 12897, + "cost_cny": 0.5, + "wall_s": 370.9, + "cost_cny_per_task": 0.05, + "valid_first": "0/10 (0%)", + "valid_final": "2/10 (20%)", + "repaired": 10, + "structure_fit": 0.89, + "source_coverage": 0.25, + "ids_provided_tasks": 2 + }, + "r1_divergence": [ + { + "group": "facts-A", + "pair": "rc-01~rc-02", + "jaccard": 0.44, + "primary": "section|section", + "distinct": true + }, + { + "group": "facts-A", + "pair": "rc-01~rc-03", + "jaccard": 0.17, + "primary": "section|markdown", + "distinct": true + }, + { + "group": "facts-A", + "pair": "rc-02~rc-03", + "jaccard": 0.32, + "primary": "section|markdown", + "distinct": true + }, + { + "group": "facts-B", + "pair": "rc-07~rc-08", + "jaccard": 0.26, + "primary": "section|section", + "distinct": true + }, + { + "group": "facts-B", + "pair": "rc-07~rc-09", + "jaccard": 0.5, + "primary": "section|section", + "distinct": true + }, + { + "group": "facts-B", + "pair": "rc-08~rc-09", + "jaccard": 0.45, + "primary": "section|section", + "distinct": true + } + ], + "r1_distinct_pairs": "6/6", + "G_structure_fit_by_family": { + "research-compare": 0.54, + "requirement-input": 0.88, + "task-overview": 0.58 + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/run_trial.py b/.task/genui-u1/run_trial.py new file mode 100644 index 00000000..6e5e1cf1 --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/run_trial.py @@ -0,0 +1,156 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env python3 +"""U1 试验运行器（原型）：B=Markdown 基线，G=UINode 生成（含一次修复），G-hs=轻量档子集。 + +用法：python3 run_trial.py --arm G [--limit N] [--only rc-01,rc-02] +密钥经环境 MINIMAX_API_KEY 注入；预算护栏 >¥200 或单臂调用超限时中止。 +""" +import argparse +import json +import os +import sys +import time + +sys.path.insert(0, os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))) +from harness import (BASELINE_PROMPT, CATALOG_PROMPT, build_user_message, + call_llm, extract_json, validate_spec) + +HERE = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__)) +RESULTS = os.path.join(HERE, "results") +# E5 任务卡记录的 MiniMax 档位价（$/M tokens：入/出），汇率按 7.2 折 CNY；保守不计缓存折扣。 +PRICE = {"MiniMax-M3": (0.3, 1.2), "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed": (0.6, 2.4)} +BUDGET_CNY, ARM_CALL_CAPS = 200.0, {"B": 60, "G": 60, "G-hs": 20} + + +def spent_cny(): + total = 0.0 + for arm in os.listdir(RESULTS) if os.path.isdir(RESULTS) else []: + d = os.path.join(RESULTS, arm) + if not os.path.isdir(d): + continue + for fn in os.listdir(d): + if not fn.endswith(".json"): + continue + try: + rec = json.load(open(os.path.join(d, fn))) + except Exception: + continue + for c in rec.get("calls", []): + u = c.get("usage", {}) + pin, pout = PRICE.get(rec.get("model", ""), (0, 0)) + total += (u.get("prompt_tokens", 0) / 1e6 * pin + u.get("completion_tokens", 0) / 1e6 * pout) * 7.2 + return total + + +def call_count(arm): + d = os.path.join(RESULTS, arm) + if not os.path.isdir(d): + return 0 + return sum(json.load(open(os.path.join(d, fn))).get("callCount", 1) + for fn in os.listdir(d) if fn.endswith(".json")) + + +def run_task(arm, model, task): + user = build_user_message(task) + sids = {m["sourceId"] for m in task["materials"]} + rec = {"task": task["id"], "family": task["family"], "arm": arm, "model": model, + "goalKind": task["expect"]["goalKind"], "calls": [], "callCount": 0} + + def call(system, user, max_tokens): + r = call_llm(model, system, user, max_tokens) + rec["calls"].append({"usage": r["usage"], "latency_s": r["latency_s"]}) + rec["callCount"] += 1 + return r + + if arm == "B": + r = call(BASELINE_PROMPT, user, 2500) + rec["markdown"] = r["content"] + rec["ok"] = bool(r["content"].strip()) + return rec + + # G / G-hs：生成 + 至多一次修复。max_tokens 需容纳内联 + 完整 JSON（6000 会在 + # M3 上被思考段挤占导致截断，见 results/ 首轮 rc-03..08 失败样本）。 + r1 = call(CATALOG_PROMPT, user, 14000) + rec["raw_first"] = r1["content"] + errors, stats, spec = [], None, None + try: + spec = extract_json(r1["content"]) + errors, stats = validate_spec(spec, sids) + except Exception as e: + errors = [f"JSON 解析失败: {e}"] + rec["valid_first"] = not errors + rec["errors_first"] = errors[:15] + rec["stats_first"] = {"nodes": stats["nodes"], "maxDepth": stats["maxDepth"], + "types": stats["types"], "refsUsed": sorted(stats["refsUsed"]), + "unknownRefs": sorted(stats["unknownRefs"])} if stats else None + if errors: + fix_user = user + "\n\n你上一次的输出被宿主拒绝，错误如下：\n" + \ + "\n".join(f"- {e}" for e in errors[:15]) + \ + "\n\n请修正后重新输出完整 JSON 对象（仍只输出 JSON）。" + r2 = call(CATALOG_PROMPT, fix_user, 14000) + rec["raw_repair"] = r2["content"] + try: + spec = extract_json(r2["content"]) + errors, stats = validate_spec(spec, sids) + except Exception as e: + errors = [f"JSON 解析失败: {e}"] + rec["repaired"] = True + else: + rec["repaired"] = False + rec["valid_final"] = not errors + rec["errors_final"] = errors[:15] + rec["spec"] = spec if not errors else None + if stats and not errors: + rec["stats_final"] = {"nodes": stats["nodes"], "maxDepth": stats["maxDepth"], + "types": stats["types"], "refsUsed": sorted(stats["refsUsed"]), + "idsProvided": len(stats["idsSeen"])} + return rec + + +def main(): + ap = argparse.ArgumentParser() + ap.add_argument("--arm", required=True, choices=list(ARM_CALL_CAPS)) + ap.add_argument("--limit", type=int, default=0) + ap.add_argument("--only", default="") + args = ap.parse_args() + + tasks = json.load(open(os.path.join(HERE, "fixtures.json")))["tasks"] + if args.only: + keep = set(args.only.split(",")) + tasks = [t for t in tasks if t["id"] in keep] + if args.arm == "G-hs": + tasks = [t for t in tasks if t["family"] != "research-compare" or t.get("sharedGroup")][:10] + if args.limit: + tasks = tasks[:args.limit] + + model = "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed" if args.arm == "G-hs" else "MiniMax-M3" + outdir = os.path.join(RESULTS, args.arm) + os.makedirs(outdir, exist_ok=True) + + for t in tasks: + out = os.path.join(outdir, t["id"] + ".json") + if os.path.exists(out): + old = json.load(open(out)) + if old.get("arm") == args.arm and old.get("model") == model and ( + old.get("ok") or old.get("valid_final")): + print(f"[skip] {t['id']} (已完成)") + continue + if call_count(args.arm) >= ARM_CALL_CAPS[args.arm]: + print(f"[stop] 臂 {args.arm} 达调用上限 {ARM_CALL_CAPS[args.arm]}") + break + spent, est = spent_cny(), 0.35 # 单次最坏估价（¥）先行校验 + if spent + est > BUDGET_CNY: + print(f"[stop] 预算护栏：已花 ¥{spent:.2f} + 单次估价 ¥{est:.2f} 将超 ¥{BUDGET_CNY}") + break + t0 = time.time() + rec = run_task(args.arm, model, t) + rec["wall_s"] = round(time.time() - t0, 1) + json.dump(rec, open(out, "w"), ensure_ascii=False, indent=1) + flag = "OK " if (rec.get("ok") or rec.get("valid_final")) else "ERR" + print(f"[{flag}] {t['id']} calls={rec['callCount']} wall={rec['wall_s']}s " + f"spent≈¥{spent_cny():.2f}") + print(f"[done] arm={args.arm} calls={call_count(args.arm)}/{ARM_CALL_CAPS[args.arm]} " + f"spent≈¥{spent_cny():.2f}") + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + main() diff --git a/.task/genui-u1/score.py b/.task/genui-u1/score.py new file mode 100644 index 00000000..322dea5f --- /dev/null +++ b/.task/genui-u1/score.py @@ -0,0 +1,133 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env python3 +"""U1 评分器（原型）：聚合 results/ 各臂，输出指标表与成本核算。""" +import json +import os +from collections import Counter + +HERE = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__)) +RESULTS = os.path.join(HERE, "results") +PRICE = {"MiniMax-M3": (0.3, 1.2), "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed": (0.6, 2.4)} + + +def load(arm): + d = os.path.join(RESULTS, arm) + if not os.path.isdir(d): + return [] + return [json.load(open(os.path.join(d, fn))) for fn in sorted(os.listdir(d)) if fn.endswith(".json")] + + +def cost_of(rec): + pin, pout = PRICE.get(rec.get("model", ""), (0, 0)) + c = 0.0 + for x in rec.get("calls", []): + u = x.get("usage", {}) + c += (u.get("prompt_tokens", 0) / 1e6 * pin + u.get("completion_tokens", 0) / 1e6 * pout) * 7.2 + return c + + +def tok(rec): + p = sum(x.get("usage", {}).get("prompt_tokens", 0) for x in rec.get("calls", [])) + c = sum(x.get("usage", {}).get("completion_tokens", 0) for x in rec.get("calls", [])) + cached = sum(x.get("usage", {}).get("prompt_tokens_details", {}).get("cached_tokens", 0) for x in rec.get("calls", [])) + return p, c, cached + + +def arm_stats(recs, label): + if not recs: + return {"arm": label, "tasks": 0} + p = sum(tok(r)[0] for r in recs); c = sum(tok(r)[1] for r in recs) + cached = sum(tok(r)[2] for r in recs) + cost = sum(cost_of(r) for r in recs) + calls = sum(r.get("callCount", 1) for r in recs) + wall = sum(r.get("wall_s", 0) for r in recs) + out = {"arm": label, "tasks": len(recs), "calls": calls, "prompt_tok": p, + "completion_tok": c, "cached_tok": cached, "cost_cny": round(cost, 2), + "wall_s": round(wall, 1), "cost_cny_per_task": round(cost / len(recs), 3)} + valid = [r for r in recs if r.get("valid_final")] + if label.startswith("G"): + vf = [r for r in recs if r.get("valid_first")] + out.update({ + "valid_first": f"{len(vf)}/{len(recs)} ({100*len(vf)//len(recs)}%)", + "valid_final": f"{len(valid)}/{len(recs)} ({100*len(valid)//len(recs)}%)", + "repaired": sum(1 for r in recs if r.get("repaired")), + }) + fits, src_cov, ids_provided = [], [], [] + for r in recs: + fx = json.load(open(os.path.join(HERE, "fixtures.json"))) + task = next(t for t in fx["tasks"] if t["id"] == r["task"]) + types = set((r.get("stats_final") or r.get("stats_first") or {}).get("types", []) or []) + if types: + exp = set(task["expect"]["nodeTypesAny"]) + fits.append(len(types & exp) / len(exp)) + nsources = len(task["materials"]) + used = (r.get("stats_final") or r.get("stats_first") or {}).get("refsUsed") or [] + src_cov.append(len(set(used)) / nsources) + if r.get("stats_final", {}).get("idsProvided"): + ids_provided.append(1) + out.update({ + "structure_fit": round(sum(fits) / len(fits), 2) if fits else None, + "source_coverage": round(sum(src_cov) / len(src_cov), 2) if src_cov else None, + "ids_provided_tasks": len(ids_provided), + }) + # B 基线结构契合恒为 0（无结构选择能力），供对照 + if label == "B": + md_tables = sum(1 for r in recs if r.get("goalKind") == "compare" + and any(l.strip().startswith("|") and "---" in l for l in r.get("markdown", "").splitlines())) + cmp_tasks = sum(1 for r in recs if r.get("goalKind") == "compare") + out["markdown_pipe_table_on_compare"] = f"{md_tables}/{cmp_tasks}" + return out + + +def r1_divergence(recs_arm): + """同料不同目标 → 结构是否分化：类型多重集 Jaccard 距离 + 主类型是否不同。""" + fx = json.load(open(os.path.join(HERE, "fixtures.json"))) + groups = {} + for t in fx["tasks"]: + if t.get("sharedGroup"): + groups.setdefault(t["sharedGroup"], []).append(t["id"]) + by_id = {r["task"]: r for r in recs_arm if r.get("valid_final")} + rows = [] + for g, ids in sorted(groups.items()): + ids = [i for i in ids if i in by_id] + for a in range(len(ids)): + for b in range(a + 1, len(ids)): + ta = Counter(by_id[ids[a]]["stats_final"]["types"]) + tb = Counter(by_id[ids[b]]["stats_final"]["types"]) + inter = sum((ta & tb).values()); union = sum((ta | tb).values()) + jac = inter / union if union else 1.0 + prim_a = ta.most_common(1)[0][0] if ta else "-" + prim_b = tb.most_common(1)[0][0] if tb else "-" + rows.append({"group": g, "pair": f"{ids[a]}~{ids[b]}", + "jaccard": round(jac, 2), "primary": f"{prim_a}|{prim_b}", + "distinct": (prim_a != prim_b) or jac < 0.6}) + return rows + + +def main(): + fx = json.load(open(os.path.join(HERE, "fixtures.json"))) + summary = {} + for arm in ("B", "G", "G-hs"): + recs = load(arm) + if recs: + summary[arm] = arm_stats(recs, arm) + g = load("G") + if g: + rows = r1_divergence(g) + summary["r1_divergence"] = rows + summary["r1_distinct_pairs"] = f"{sum(1 for r in rows if r['distinct'])}/{len(rows)}" + # 按族拆 G 的结构契合 + fam = {} + for r in g: + if r.get("valid_final"): + task = next(t for t in fx["tasks"] if t["id"] == r["task"]) + types = set(r["stats_final"]["types"]) + exp = set(task["expect"]["nodeTypesAny"]) + fam.setdefault(task["family"], []).append(len(types & exp) / len(exp)) + if fam: + summary["G_structure_fit_by_family"] = {k: round(sum(v) / len(v), 2) for k, v in fam.items()} + json.dump(summary, open(os.path.join(RESULTS, "summary.json"), "w"), ensure_ascii=False, indent=1) + print(json.dumps(summary, ensure_ascii=False, indent=1)) + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + main() diff --git a/PROJECT.md b/PROJECT.md index 3c3d0a86..58f23a7b 100644 --- a/PROJECT.md +++ b/PROJECT.md @@ -12,8 +12,10 @@ 目录中的既有文档不因被收录而自动成为已批准规划。记录、任务关联及收尾建议按 [交付规范的长期方向与任务衔接](policy/delivery.md#长期方向与任务衔接) 执行。 -新增方向：[Generative UI 调研与插件方案 r1](modules/documents/docs/proposals/2026-10-10-generative-ui-plugin.md)。 -2026-10-11 用户已裁定首试点（对话内分析页）、可信编译插件交付与 U1 试验参数；试验、实施与部署分别评审。 +新增方向：[Generative UI 调研与插件方案 r2](modules/documents/docs/proposals/2026-10-10-generative-ui-plugin.md)。 +2026-10-11 用户裁定首试点（对话内分析页）、可信编译插件交付与试验参数；U1 受控试验当日完成 +（结构分化 6/6、生成走工具参数通道、首期自研 renderer，详见方案「U1 结果与 r2 修订」）； +U2 起实施与部署分别评审。 - [多人协作存储与分布式演进方案](modules/documents/docs/proposals/2026-10-11-collaboration-storage-and-distribution.md)： 10–100 人、多项目、多会话并行；PostgreSQL 团队档、迁移恢复与多实例执行。方案 r1 已批准 diff --git a/modules/documents b/modules/documents index 3304efee..336a90f0 160000 --- a/modules/documents +++ b/modules/documents @@ -1 +1 @@ -Subproject commit 3304efee154e218fa223419b624e8cefb4c762e1 +Subproject commit 336a90f0ade0ffe049879ca5159a61f0a3948708 From 80024832a8196b1eaccfe43c19349af8ccd6e95d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: weichen Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 04:43:28 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 08/13] Record the sync checkpoint Why: bind the task validation checkpoint to the latest integration baseline. Evidence: SELF recursive component checks; sync_base=6479eb5c38636e758b7e44a36fdc7ce6883ad1c9; candidate=954ea710df182128d782196d99dbbbfae4d114d4. Impact: task metadata only. Refs: .task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md --- .task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/.task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md b/.task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md index 7870a944..9760b134 100644 --- a/.task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md +++ b/.task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md @@ -121,3 +121,4 @@ "receipt_sha256": "f67c6ebe58d98e318562d10f06c23ed267ed541098c9a30ad6d38a36d1fd9bd6" } ``` +| 同步前验收 | 6479eb5c38636e758b7e44a36fdc7ce6883ad1c9 | 954ea710df182128d782196d99dbbbfae4d114d4 | 2026-10-11T04:43:28Z | From 420986641f0349af044ea72fd02330cf6a96b58b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: weichen Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 04:44:47 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 09/13] Record the task-sync and test receipts for the U1 publication --- .task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+) diff --git a/.task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md b/.task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md index 9760b134..73ba895b 100644 --- a/.task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md +++ b/.task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md @@ -122,3 +122,79 @@ } ``` | 同步前验收 | 6479eb5c38636e758b7e44a36fdc7ce6883ad1c9 | 954ea710df182128d782196d99dbbbfae4d114d4 | 2026-10-11T04:43:28Z | + + +```json +{ + "schema": 1, + "source": "SELF", + "timestamp": "2026-10-11T04:43:04.431116+00:00", + "command": "make task-sync", + "command_sha256": "6c0e3c8fbb3f43d01548180c9d9c147ce1c1c32ba1e78d3383961de470fe0d52", + "cwd": "/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-generative-ui-u1", + "common_dir": "/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev/.git", + "before": { + "head": "1c25d65ae9f8b36b266598bfbab55c094f09a5be", + "branch": "feature/generative-ui-u1", + "target_branch": "main", + "target_head": "6479eb5c38636e758b7e44a36fdc7ce6883ad1c9", + "status": "", + "tracked_diff_sha256": "e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855", + "untracked": {}, + "submodules": " 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 deps/agent-command (heads/main)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (remotes/origin/feature/delivery-mechanism-5-ged2af3e)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e deps/agent-squad (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n af199eeaa23c5b39e08b4649f2513d7572dc5274 deps/development-guidelines (heads/main)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n ea4651b1f870d84ab9b72cfa79363b3432d113b3 modules/backend (v0.3.0-28-gea4651b)\n 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 modules/backend/deps/agent-command (heads/main)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 modules/backend/deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (remotes/origin/feature/delivery-mechanism-5-ged2af3e)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e modules/backend/deps/agent-squad (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/backend/deps/agent-system-core (v0.3.0)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/core (v0.3.0)\n 336a90f0ade0ffe049879ca5159a61f0a3948708 modules/documents (heads/main)\n 3ed10e122042a64180fb24a42d9cc6438cd2d2d6 modules/frontend (v0.3.0-4-g3ed10e1)\n 76d6633736a7abb36ac1ecca42fe4e6f120d0558 modules/ui (v0.3.0)\n" + }, + "after": { + "head": "80024832a8196b1eaccfe43c19349af8ccd6e95d", + "branch": "feature/generative-ui-u1", + "target_branch": "main", + "target_head": "6479eb5c38636e758b7e44a36fdc7ce6883ad1c9", + "status": "", + "tracked_diff_sha256": "e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855", + "untracked": {}, + "submodules": " 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 deps/agent-command (heads/main)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (remotes/origin/feature/delivery-mechanism-5-ged2af3e)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e deps/agent-squad (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n af199eeaa23c5b39e08b4649f2513d7572dc5274 deps/development-guidelines (heads/main)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n f480c5b5207a183d9f282a57950b6726811bd3f4 modules/backend (v0.3.0-34-gf480c5b)\n 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 modules/backend/deps/agent-command (heads/main)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 modules/backend/deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (remotes/origin/feature/delivery-mechanism-5-ged2af3e)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e modules/backend/deps/agent-squad (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/backend/deps/agent-system-core (v0.3.0)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/core (v0.3.0)\n 336a90f0ade0ffe049879ca5159a61f0a3948708 modules/documents (heads/main)\n 3ed10e122042a64180fb24a42d9cc6438cd2d2d6 modules/frontend (v0.3.0-4-g3ed10e1)\n 76d6633736a7abb36ac1ecca42fe4e6f120d0558 modules/ui (v0.3.0)\n" + }, + "after_error": null, + "exit_code": 0, + "output": "make[1]: Entering directory '/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-generative-ui-u1'\n[worktree] before-sync: recursive component checks passed\nNote: Fast-forwarding submodule modules/documents to 336a90f0ade0ffe049879ca5159a61f0a3948708\nMerge made by the 'ort' strategy.\n .gitea/workflows/ci.yaml | 199 ++++++++++++++++++\n .task/archive/feature-collab-storage-pg-tier.md | 256 ++++++++++++++++++++++++\n Makefile | 10 +-\n modules/backend | 2 +-\n 4 files changed, 465 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)\n create mode 100644 .task/archive/feature-collab-storage-pg-tier.md\n[worktree] before-update: recursive component checks passed\nFrom ssh://git-ssh.u1680832.nyat.app:31411/weichen/Agent-System-Backend\n * [new branch] feature/collab-storage-pg-tier-fix1 -> origin/feature/collab-storage-pg-tier-fix1\n * [new branch] feature/collab-storage-pg-tier-fix2 -> origin/feature/collab-storage-pg-tier-fix2\n * [new branch] feature/collab-storage-u3-atomicity -> origin/feature/collab-storage-u3-atomicity\n 2497508..3def525 main -> origin/main\nSubmodule path 'modules/backend': checked out 'f480c5b5207a183d9f282a57950b6726811bd3f4'\n[worktree] materialize: recursive component checks passed\n[worktree] after-sync: recursive component checks passed\n[evidence] WARN JSON receipt line 88: recorded HEAD predates non-card changes ——关键检查须重跑并以 make evidence 重新写入\n[synced] sync_base=6479eb5c38 tested_head=954ea710df checked_at=2026-10-11T04:43:28Z\n[next] 跑正式验收（make test 等），证据写入任务卡\nmake[1]: Leaving directory '/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-generative-ui-u1'\n", + "output_sha256": "884a53025fd4a5091942252f5152dd034cb292f33b90e98abea90419bb3101d1", + "receipt_sha256": "71395390bd09bf46ed46190c07259c742ece4878e38a4273efd0076b20a600ba" +} +``` + + +```json +{ + "schema": 1, + "source": "SELF", + "timestamp": "2026-10-11T04:43:34.818314+00:00", + "command": "make test", + "command_sha256": "22cc66aa7d2624b4eb4d5b61658614cd6c32477b123afbf7dbc7fc3d7d0f3713", + "cwd": "/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-generative-ui-u1", + "common_dir": "/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev/.git", + "before": { + "head": "80024832a8196b1eaccfe43c19349af8ccd6e95d", + "branch": "feature/generative-ui-u1", + "target_branch": "main", + "target_head": "6479eb5c38636e758b7e44a36fdc7ce6883ad1c9", + "status": "", + "tracked_diff_sha256": "e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855", + "untracked": {}, + "submodules": " 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 deps/agent-command (heads/main)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (remotes/origin/feature/delivery-mechanism-5-ged2af3e)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e deps/agent-squad (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n af199eeaa23c5b39e08b4649f2513d7572dc5274 deps/development-guidelines (heads/main)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n f480c5b5207a183d9f282a57950b6726811bd3f4 modules/backend (v0.3.0-34-gf480c5b)\n 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 modules/backend/deps/agent-command (heads/main)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 modules/backend/deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (remotes/origin/feature/delivery-mechanism-5-ged2af3e)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e modules/backend/deps/agent-squad (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/backend/deps/agent-system-core (v0.3.0)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/core (v0.3.0)\n 336a90f0ade0ffe049879ca5159a61f0a3948708 modules/documents (heads/main)\n 3ed10e122042a64180fb24a42d9cc6438cd2d2d6 modules/frontend (v0.3.0-4-g3ed10e1)\n 76d6633736a7abb36ac1ecca42fe4e6f120d0558 modules/ui (v0.3.0)\n" + }, + "after": { + "head": "80024832a8196b1eaccfe43c19349af8ccd6e95d", + "branch": "feature/generative-ui-u1", + "target_branch": "main", + "target_head": "6479eb5c38636e758b7e44a36fdc7ce6883ad1c9", + "status": "", + "tracked_diff_sha256": "e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855", + "untracked": {}, + "submodules": " 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 deps/agent-command (heads/main)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (remotes/origin/feature/delivery-mechanism-5-ged2af3e)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e deps/agent-squad (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n af199eeaa23c5b39e08b4649f2513d7572dc5274 deps/development-guidelines (heads/main)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n f480c5b5207a183d9f282a57950b6726811bd3f4 modules/backend (v0.3.0-34-gf480c5b)\n 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 modules/backend/deps/agent-command (heads/main)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 modules/backend/deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (remotes/origin/feature/delivery-mechanism-5-ged2af3e)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e modules/backend/deps/agent-squad (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/backend/deps/agent-system-core (v0.3.0)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/core (v0.3.0)\n 336a90f0ade0ffe049879ca5159a61f0a3948708 modules/documents (heads/main)\n 3ed10e122042a64180fb24a42d9cc6438cd2d2d6 modules/frontend (v0.3.0-4-g3ed10e1)\n 76d6633736a7abb36ac1ecca42fe4e6f120d0558 modules/ui (v0.3.0)\n" + }, + "after_error": null, + "exit_code": 0, + "output": "make[1]: Entering directory '/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-generative-ui-u1'\npython3 scripts/check-worktree.py verify\n[worktree] verify: recursive component checks passed\nPYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 python3 -m unittest discover -s tests -p 'test_*.py' -v\ntest_candidate_cannot_read_checkout_credentials (test_ci_credentials.CheckoutTests.test_candidate_cannot_read_checkout_credentials) ... ok\ntest_candidate_submodule_update_commands_are_rejected (test_ci_credentials.CheckoutTests.test_candidate_submodule_update_commands_are_rejected) ... ok\ntest_credential_destination_confined_to_injected_server (test_ci_credentials.CheckoutTests.test_credential_destination_confined_to_injected_server) ... ok\ntest_external_or_unlisted_urls_are_rejected_before_component_fetch (test_ci_credentials.CheckoutTests.test_external_or_unlisted_urls_are_rejected_before_component_fetch) ... ok\ntest_inherited_template_hook_does_not_execute_with_credentials (test_ci_credentials.CheckoutTests.test_inherited_template_hook_does_not_execute_with_credentials) ... ok\ntest_nested_external_url_is_rejected_before_authenticated_fetch (test_ci_credentials.CheckoutTests.test_nested_external_url_is_rejected_before_authenticated_fetch) ... ok\ntest_recursive_gitlinks_materialize_exact_sha_without_persisting_credentials (test_ci_credentials.CheckoutTests.test_recursive_gitlinks_materialize_exact_sha_without_persisting_credentials) ... ok\ntest_redirects_do_not_forward_credential_or_fetch_unlisted_target (test_ci_credentials.CheckoutTests.test_redirects_do_not_forward_credential_or_fetch_unlisted_target) ... ok\ntest_after_snapshot_failure_keeps_command_exit_and_output (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_after_snapshot_failure_keeps_command_exit_and_output) ... ok\ntest_all_persisted_and_displayed_text_is_sanitized (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_all_persisted_and_displayed_text_is_sanitized) ... ok\ntest_authorization_forms_are_redacted_in_capture_console_and_import (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_authorization_forms_are_redacted_in_capture_console_and_import) ... ok\ntest_authorization_forms_are_redacted_on_direct_card_capture (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_authorization_forms_are_redacted_on_direct_card_capture) ... ok\ntest_before_after_heads_do_not_relabel_changed_command (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_before_after_heads_do_not_relabel_changed_command) ... ok\ntest_capture_does_not_overwrite_an_existing_receipt (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_capture_does_not_overwrite_an_existing_receipt) ... ok\ntest_capture_without_card_and_import_without_rerun (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_capture_without_card_and_import_without_rerun) ... ok\ntest_child_failure_code_is_preserved (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_child_failure_code_is_preserved) ... ok\ntest_command_line_token_arguments_are_redacted (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_command_line_token_arguments_are_redacted) ... ok\ntest_dirty_and_untracked_contents_have_object_digests (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_dirty_and_untracked_contents_have_object_digests) ... ok\ntest_failed_child_exit_survives_receipt_write_failure (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_failed_child_exit_survives_receipt_write_failure) ... ok\ntest_full_output_is_preserved_not_only_tail (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_full_output_is_preserved_not_only_tail) ... ok\ntest_import_missing_card_fails_without_losing_receipt (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_import_missing_card_fails_without_losing_receipt) ... ok\ntest_import_rejects_unredacted_authorization_with_valid_checksums (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_import_rejects_unredacted_authorization_with_valid_checksums) ... ok\ntest_import_retry_is_idempotent (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_import_retry_is_idempotent) ... ok\ntest_invalid_field_types_and_forged_source_are_rejected (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_invalid_field_types_and_forged_source_are_rejected) ... ok\ntest_known_secret_environment_value_is_redacted_without_label (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_known_secret_environment_value_is_redacted_without_label) ... ok\ntest_linked_worktree_import_preserves_source_identity (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_linked_worktree_import_preserves_source_identity) ... ok\ntest_missing_card_does_not_execute (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_missing_card_does_not_execute) ... ok\ntest_missing_required_snapshot_fields_are_rejected (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_missing_required_snapshot_fields_are_rejected) ... ok\ntest_nested_cwd_records_untracked_files_from_repository_root (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_nested_cwd_records_untracked_files_from_repository_root) ... ok\ntest_output_digest_checked_even_if_receipt_digest_recomputed (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_output_digest_checked_even_if_receipt_digest_recomputed) ... ok\ntest_pipeline_failure_is_recorded_and_returned (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_pipeline_failure_is_recorded_and_returned) ... ok\ntest_quoted_credentials_with_spaces_are_fully_redacted (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_quoted_credentials_with_spaces_are_fully_redacted) ... ok\ntest_receipt_write_failure_cannot_claim_success (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_receipt_write_failure_cannot_claim_success) ... ok\ntest_recorder_environment_does_not_leak_into_nested_commands (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_recorder_environment_does_not_leak_into_nested_commands) ... ok\ntest_source_cannot_be_promoted_by_environment (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_source_cannot_be_promoted_by_environment) ... ok\ntest_tamper_is_rejected_before_card_append (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_tamper_is_rejected_before_card_append) ... ok\ntest_unrelated_repo_cannot_import (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_unrelated_repo_cannot_import) ... ok\ntest_validate_precheck_checks_result_and_current_base (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_validate_precheck_checks_result_and_current_base) ... ok\ntest_validate_precheck_rejects_successful_arbitrary_command (test_evidence.EvidenceTests.test_validate_precheck_rejects_successful_arbitrary_command) ... ok\ntest_ide_lock_in_git_dir_does_not_block_finish (test_task.FinishGuardFixTests.test_ide_lock_in_git_dir_does_not_block_finish) ... ok\ntest_local_default_branch_at_origin_main_does_not_block (test_task.FinishGuardFixTests.test_local_default_branch_at_origin_main_does_not_block)\n克隆默认分支停在 origin/main 顶端（pin 为 feature 顶端时不在其历史内） ... ok\ntest_local_unique_commit_still_preserved (test_task.FinishGuardFixTests.test_local_unique_commit_still_preserved) ... ok\ntest_real_git_lock_still_blocks_finish (test_task.FinishGuardFixTests.test_real_git_lock_still_blocks_finish) ... ok\ntest_remote_tracking_refs_do_not_block_finish (test_task.FinishGuardFixTests.test_remote_tracking_refs_do_not_block_finish) ... ok\ntest_finish_abandon_retains_local_remote_tips_and_reason (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_abandon_retains_local_remote_tips_and_reason) ... ok\ntest_finish_abandon_without_reason_preserves_checkout_and_refs (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_abandon_without_reason_preserves_checkout_and_refs) ... ok\ntest_finish_clean_worktree_has_accurate_remote_result (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_clean_worktree_has_accurate_remote_result) ... ok\ntest_finish_deletes_only_merged_remote_branch (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_deletes_only_merged_remote_branch) ... ok\ntest_finish_preserves_component_commits_off_the_pinned_head (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_preserves_component_commits_off_the_pinned_head) ... ok\ntest_finish_preserves_component_untracked_file (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_preserves_component_untracked_file) ... ok\ntest_finish_preserves_linked_component_worktrees_at_the_pinned_head (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_preserves_linked_component_worktrees_at_the_pinned_head) ... ok\ntest_finish_preserves_linked_nested_component_worktree (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_preserves_linked_nested_component_worktree) ... ok\ntest_finish_preserves_locked_worktree (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_preserves_locked_worktree) ... ok\ntest_finish_preserves_main_and_active_index_lock (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_preserves_main_and_active_index_lock) ... ok\ntest_finish_preserves_modified_untracked_and_ignored_files (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_preserves_modified_untracked_and_ignored_files) ... ok\ntest_finish_preserves_remote_unmerged_tip (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_preserves_remote_unmerged_tip) ... ok\ntest_finish_recycles_clean_submodule_without_shared_config_changes (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_recycles_clean_submodule_without_shared_config_changes) ... ok\ntest_finish_rejects_subdirectory_without_deleting_it (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_rejects_subdirectory_without_deleting_it) ... ok\ntest_finish_remote_deletion_lease_preserves_concurrent_update (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_remote_deletion_lease_preserves_concurrent_update) ... ok\ntest_finish_requires_writer_exit_confirmation (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_finish_requires_writer_exit_confirmation) ... ok\ntest_post_merge_is_silent_outside_main_checkout (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_post_merge_is_silent_outside_main_checkout) ... ok\ntest_post_merge_main_merge_only_reminds_owner (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_post_merge_main_merge_only_reminds_owner) ... ok\ntest_post_merge_main_pull_only_reminds_owner (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_post_merge_main_pull_only_reminds_owner) ... ok\ntest_precheck_feature_behind_requires_sync (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_precheck_feature_behind_requires_sync) ... ok\ntest_precheck_rejects_unreachable_authority (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_precheck_rejects_unreachable_authority) ... ok\ntest_precheck_routes_existing_project_delivery_policy (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_precheck_routes_existing_project_delivery_policy) ... ok\ntest_start_imports_precheck_and_creates_four_part_commit (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_start_imports_precheck_and_creates_four_part_commit) ... ok\ntest_start_offline_does_not_create_worktree (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_start_offline_does_not_create_worktree) ... ok\ntest_start_preserves_merged_local_and_remote_branch_names (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_start_preserves_merged_local_and_remote_branch_names) ... ok\ntest_start_rejects_receipt_when_authoritative_base_changed (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_start_rejects_receipt_when_authoritative_base_changed) ... ok\ntest_start_requires_precheck_receipt_before_creating_worktree (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_start_requires_precheck_receipt_before_creating_worktree) ... ok\ntest_start_stacked_branch_records_parent_and_main_baseline (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_start_stacked_branch_records_parent_and_main_baseline) ... ok\ntest_sync_commit_failure_never_reports_synced (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_commit_failure_never_reports_synced) ... ok\ntest_sync_does_not_execute_json_receipt_command (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_does_not_execute_json_receipt_command) ... ok\ntest_sync_keeps_json_evidence_fresh_after_metadata_only_changes (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_keeps_json_evidence_fresh_after_metadata_only_changes) ... ok\ntest_sync_keeps_unchanged_component_branch (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_keeps_unchanged_component_branch) ... ok\ntest_sync_materializes_nested_detached_components (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_materializes_nested_detached_components) ... ok\ntest_sync_materializes_updated_component (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_materializes_updated_component) ... ok\ntest_sync_preserves_component_feature_branch (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_preserves_component_feature_branch) ... ok\ntest_sync_preserves_dirty_child (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_preserves_dirty_child) ... ok\ntest_sync_preserves_nested_feature_branch_when_parent_pin_changes (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_preserves_nested_feature_branch_when_parent_pin_changes) ... ok\ntest_sync_reads_legacy_commands_with_escaped_pipes (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_reads_legacy_commands_with_escaped_pipes) ... ok\ntest_sync_still_warns_for_stale_legacy_table_evidence (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_still_warns_for_stale_legacy_table_evidence) ... ok\ntest_sync_warns_for_malformed_json_evidence (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_warns_for_malformed_json_evidence) ... ok\ntest_sync_warns_for_missing_json_receipt_fields_even_with_valid_checksum (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_warns_for_missing_json_receipt_fields_even_with_valid_checksum) ... ok\ntest_sync_warns_for_unresolved_json_evidence_head (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_warns_for_unresolved_json_evidence_head) ... ok\ntest_sync_warns_for_unresolved_legacy_evidence_head (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_warns_for_unresolved_legacy_evidence_head) ... ok\ntest_sync_warns_when_json_after_state_contains_uncommitted_code (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_warns_when_json_after_state_contains_uncommitted_code) ... ok\ntest_sync_warns_when_json_before_state_contains_uncommitted_code (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_warns_when_json_before_state_contains_uncommitted_code) ... ok\ntest_sync_warns_when_json_evidence_predates_noncard_changes (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_sync_warns_when_json_evidence_predates_noncard_changes) ... ok\ntest_verify_rejects_recursive_drift_even_when_root_has_local_edits (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_verify_rejects_recursive_drift_even_when_root_has_local_edits) ... ok\ntest_verify_rejects_uninitialized_component (test_task.TaskLifecycleTests.test_verify_rejects_uninitialized_component) ... ok\ntest_deleting_main_symlink_to_outside_is_denied (test_write_guard.WriteGuardTests.test_deleting_main_symlink_to_outside_is_denied) ... ok\ntest_detached_and_bad_branches_are_denied (test_write_guard.WriteGuardTests.test_detached_and_bad_branches_are_denied) ... ok\ntest_every_patch_file_and_move_destination_is_checked (test_write_guard.WriteGuardTests.test_every_patch_file_and_move_destination_is_checked) ... ok\ntest_feature_missing_parent_is_allowed (test_write_guard.WriteGuardTests.test_feature_missing_parent_is_allowed) ... ok\ntest_invalid_json_is_denied (test_write_guard.WriteGuardTests.test_invalid_json_is_denied) ... ok\ntest_missing_parent_on_main_is_denied (test_write_guard.WriteGuardTests.test_missing_parent_on_main_is_denied) ... ok\ntest_missing_unknown_and_malformed_write_input_are_denied (test_write_guard.WriteGuardTests.test_missing_unknown_and_malformed_write_input_are_denied) ... ok\ntest_non_git_destination_is_explicitly_outside_scope (test_write_guard.WriteGuardTests.test_non_git_destination_is_explicitly_outside_scope) ... ok\ntest_nonwrite_tools_are_outside_scope (test_write_guard.WriteGuardTests.test_nonwrite_tools_are_outside_scope) ... ok\ntest_relative_path_uses_hook_cwd_not_process_cwd (test_write_guard.WriteGuardTests.test_relative_path_uses_hook_cwd_not_process_cwd) ... ok\ntest_symlink_into_main_with_missing_parents_is_denied (test_write_guard.WriteGuardTests.test_symlink_into_main_with_missing_parents_is_denied) ... ok\ntest_valid_multi_file_patch_on_feature_is_allowed (test_write_guard.WriteGuardTests.test_valid_multi_file_patch_on_feature_is_allowed) ... ok\n\n----------------------------------------------------------------------\nRan 104 tests in 24.065s\n\nOK\nbash scripts/lint-boundaries.sh\nwarn: architecture edges no longer present; delete them from the baseline\n backend/runmgr backend/cmdbus\narchitecture ok (77 edges)\narchitecture negative ok\nboundaries ok\nbash scripts/check-pins.sh\nok modules/backend agent-command\nok modules/backend agent-intent\nok modules/backend agent-native\nok modules/backend agent-squad\nok modules/backend agent-system-core\nok modules/backend error-code-system\nok modules/backend logging-system\nok deps/agent-native agent-intent\nwarn: deps/agent-native deps/development-guidelines is 26b562d2e34f, Dev is af199eeaa23c\nok deps/agent-native error-code-system\nok deps/agent-native logging-system\nok deps/agent-squad agent-intent\nok deps/agent-squad agent-native\nwarn: deps/agent-squad deps/development-guidelines is 26b562d2e34f, Dev is af199eeaa23c\nok deps/agent-squad error-code-system\nok deps/agent-squad logging-system\nwarn: deps/agent-intent deps/development-guidelines is 26b562d2e34f, Dev is af199eeaa23c\nok deps/agent-intent error-code-system\nok deps/agent-intent logging-system\npins ok\ncd deps/agent-intent && GOWORK=off go vet ./... && GOWORK=off go test -count=1 ./...\nok \tagent-intent/catalogcheck\t0.002s\nok \tagent-intent/cmd/intentctl\t0.003s\nok \tagent-intent/conformance\t0.002s\nok \tagent-intent/examples\t0.002s\nok \tagent-intent/intent\t0.006s\nok \tagent-intent/schema\t0.002s\ncd deps/agent-native && GOWORK=off go vet ./... && GOWORK=off go test -count=1 ./...\nok \tagent-native/adapters/native\t0.195s\nok \tagent-native/adapters/pitransport\t0.035s\nok \tagent-native/catalogcheck\t0.002s\n? \tagent-native/cmd/agent-native\t[no test files]\nok \tagent-native/conformance\t0.052s\nok \tagent-native/exec\t0.151s\nok \tagent-native/rpc\t0.003s\nok \tagent-native/runtime\t1.399s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/agentspec\t0.002s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/checkpoint\t0.003s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/codeorch\t0.072s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/ext\t0.024s\n? \tagent-native/runtime/ext/pkg\t[no test files]\nok \tagent-native/runtime/filestate\t0.022s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/gates\t0.002s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/guardrails\t0.002s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/hooks\t0.002s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/llm\t0.261s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/mcp\t13.252s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/memory\t0.002s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/policy\t0.002s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/promptx\t0.002s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/reminders\t0.002s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/resources\t0.003s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/session\t0.009s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/skills\t0.003s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/subagent\t0.004s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/telemetry\t0.004s\nok \tagent-native/runtime/tools\t11.279s\nok \tagent-native/schema\t0.002s\ncd deps/agent-squad && GOWORK=off go vet ./... && GOWORK=off go test -count=1 ./...\nok \tagent-squad/schema\t0.003s\nok \tagent-squad/squad\t0.963s\nok \tagent-squad/store\t0.003s\nok \tagent-squad/textextract\t0.002s\ncd deps/agent-squad/adapters/intent && GOWORK=off go vet ./... && GOWORK=off go test -count=1 ./...\nok \tagent-squad/adapters/intent\t0.006s\ncd deps/agent-squad/adapters/native && GOWORK=off go vet ./... && GOWORK=off go test -count=1 ./...\nok \tagent-squad/adapters/native\t0.002s\ncd deps/agent-squad/adapters/sqlite && GOWORK=off go vet ./... && GOWORK=off go test -count=1 ./...\nok \tagent-squad/adapters/sqlite\t0.020s\ncd deps/agent-squad/cmd/agent-squad && GOWORK=off go vet ./... && GOWORK=off go test -count=1 ./...\n? \tagent-squad/cmd/agent-squad\t[no test files]\nok \tagent-squad/cmd/agent-squad/cli\t0.002s\nok \tagent-squad/cmd/agent-squad/conformance\t0.004s\nok \tagent-squad/cmd/agent-squad/server\t0.570s\ncd modules/core && go test ./...\nok \tagent-system-core\t0.003s\ncd modules/backend && go test ./...\n? \tagent-system-backend/cmd/agent-system\t[no test files]\nok \tagent-system-backend/eval\t0.003s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/app\t0.087s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/blobstore\t0.002s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/bus\t0.002s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/cardsvc\t0.076s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/cmdbus\t0.012s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/config\t0.003s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/ctxasm\t0.005s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/docgen\t0.004s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/evalgold\t0.003s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/hostapi\t0.024s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/ingest\t0.538s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/intentgate\t0.003s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/intentsem\t0.003s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/pgbus\t0.003s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/plugins\t0.171s\n? \tagent-system-backend/internal/profiles\t[no test files]\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/prompts\t0.041s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/quality\t0.106s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/rag\t0.098s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/ratelimit\t0.003s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/route\t0.002s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/runmgr\t0.490s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/runtime\t1.155s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/server\t5.490s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/settings\t0.013s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/skills\t1.200s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/squadadapter\t0.092s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/store\t0.652s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/tools\t13.178s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/wfcompile\t0.038s\nok \tagent-system-backend/internal/workflow\t0.002s\nok \tagent-system-backend/pkg/extension\t0.002s\n? \tagent-system-backend/pkg/extension/link\t[no test files]\n? \tagent-system-backend/web\t[no test files]\ncp modules/core/ts/types.ts modules/frontend/src/contracts.ts.tmp\n{ echo \"// 从 Agent-System-Core ts/types.ts 同步（make contracts 生成；Core 为权威）。\"; cat modules/frontend/src/contracts.ts.tmp; } > modules/frontend/src/contracts.ts\nrm modules/frontend/src/contracts.ts.tmp\ncp modules/core/ts/types.ts modules/ui/src/contracts.ts.tmp\n{ echo \"// 从 Agent-System-Core ts/types.ts 同步（make contracts 生成；Core 为权威）。\"; cat modules/ui/src/contracts.ts.tmp; } > modules/ui/src/contracts.ts\nrm modules/ui/src/contracts.ts.tmp\ncd modules/frontend && npm ci --no-fund --no-audit && npx vitest run && node scripts/check-knip.mjs\nnpm warn deprecated uuid@10.0.0: uuid@10 and below is no longer supported. For ESM codebases, update to uuid@latest. For CommonJS codebases, use uuid@11 (but be aware this version will likely be deprecated in 2028).\n\nadded 173 packages in 986ms\nnpm warn install-scripts 1 package has install scripts not yet covered by allowScripts:\nnpm warn install-scripts esbuild@0.25.12 (postinstall: node install.js)\nnpm warn install-scripts\nnpm warn install-scripts Run `npm install-scripts ls` to review, or `npm install-scripts approve ` to allow.\n\n RUN v4.1.11 /home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-generative-ui-u1/modules/frontend\n\n ✓ test/contracts.test.ts (5 tests) 4ms\n(node:46764) ExperimentalWarning: localStorage is not available because --localstorage-file was not provided.\n(Use `node --trace-warnings ...` to show where the warning was created)\n ✓ test/design-guard.test.ts (6 tests) 6ms\n ✓ test/html-sinks.test.ts (1 test) 4ms\n ✓ test/previewfit.test.ts (4 tests) 3ms\n ✓ test/tasklist.test.ts (6 tests) 6ms\n ✓ test/scrollsync.test.ts (2 tests) 3ms\n ✓ test/live.test.ts (19 tests) 7ms\n ✓ test/previewtabs.test.ts (2 tests) 5ms\n ✓ test/workspaces.test.ts (3 tests) 3ms\n ✓ test/preview-empty-state.test.ts (3 tests) 5ms\n ✓ test/toolkind.test.ts (5 tests) 6ms\n ✓ test/theme.test.ts (3 tests) 4ms\n ✓ test/outbox.test.ts (3 tests) 5ms\n ✓ test/messageparts.test.ts (11 tests) 9ms\n ✓ test/auth.test.ts (4 tests) 29ms\n(node:46818) ExperimentalWarning: localStorage is not available because --localstorage-file was not provided.\n(Use `node --trace-warnings ...` to show where the warning was created)\n(node:46817) ExperimentalWarning: localStorage is not available because --localstorage-file was not provided.\n(Use `node --trace-warnings ...` to show where the warning was created)\n ✓ test/send.test.ts (4 tests) 2ms\n ✓ test/notice.test.ts (2 tests) 8ms\n ✓ src/runstate.test.ts (2 tests) 291ms\n\n Test Files 18 passed (18)\n Tests 85 passed (85)\n Start at 04:44:36\n Duration 468ms (transform 924ms, setup 0ms, import 1.46s, tests 401ms, environment 1ms)\n\nknip unused exports 42 <= 43\ncd modules/ui && npm ci --no-fund --no-audit && npx tsc --noEmit && npx vitest run && node scripts/check-knip.mjs\nnpm warn deprecated whatwg-encoding@3.1.1: Use @exodus/bytes instead for a more spec-conformant and faster implementation\n\nadded 162 packages in 580ms\n\n RUN v4.1.11 /home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-generative-ui-u1/modules/ui\n\n ✓ test/contrast-guard.test.ts (19 tests) 10ms\n ✓ test/design-guard.test.ts (9 tests) 7ms\n ✓ test/html-sinks.test.ts (1 test) 4ms\n ✓ test/safe-html.test.tsx (3 tests) 46ms\n ✓ test/collapsible.test.tsx (5 tests) 73ms\n ✓ test/toolblock.test.tsx (4 tests) 64ms\nstderr | test/file-preview.test.tsx > OfficePreview 注入槽 > renders via injected loader and surfaces errors\n[preview:docx] 坏.docx Error: bad zip\n at docx (/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-generative-ui-u1/modules/ui/test/file-preview.test.tsx:69:61)\n at /home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-generative-ui-u1/modules/ui/src/FilePreview.tsx:169:5\n at Object.react_stack_bottom_frame (/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-generative-ui-u1/modules/ui/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.development.js:28656:20)\n at runWithFiberInDEV (/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-generative-ui-u1/modules/ui/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.development.js:1048:13)\n at commitHookEffectListMount (/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-generative-ui-u1/modules/ui/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.development.js:13748:29)\n at commitHookPassiveMountEffects (/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-generative-ui-u1/modules/ui/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.development.js:13835:11)\n at commitPassiveMountOnFiber (/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-generative-ui-u1/modules/ui/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.development.js:16906:13)\n at recursivelyTraversePassiveMountEffects (/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-generative-ui-u1/modules/ui/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.development.js:16851:13)\n at commitPassiveMountOnFiber (/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-generative-ui-u1/modules/ui/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.development.js:17183:11)\n at recursivelyTraversePassiveMountEffects (/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-generative-ui-u1/modules/ui/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.development.js:16851:13)\n\n ✓ test/tabstrip.test.tsx (3 tests) 64ms\n ✓ test/ui.test.tsx (6 tests) 63ms\n ✓ test/overlay-host.test.tsx (6 tests) 63ms\n ✓ test/card-anchor.test.tsx (4 tests) 82ms\n ✓ test/file-preview.test.tsx (9 tests) 79ms\n ✓ test/inbox.test.tsx (13 tests) 82ms\n ✓ test/inline-confirm.test.tsx (7 tests) 97ms\n ✓ test/capability.test.tsx (14 tests) 146ms\n\n Test Files 14 passed (14)\n Tests 103 passed (103)\n Start at 04:44:40\n Duration 579ms (transform 338ms, setup 0ms, import 1.13s, tests 879ms, environment 3.07s)\n\nknip unused exports 55 <= 55\ncd deps/agent-command && go vet ./... && go test -count=1 ./...\nok \tagent-command\t0.002s\nok \tagent-command/conformance\t0.001s\nmake[1]: Leaving directory '/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-generative-ui-u1'\n", + "output_sha256": "cdf9b4c14d1a97a0cc8a67feac94fe217e59f81a5b45f7a3bb19237a7fb1909f", + "receipt_sha256": "76d7a79e322c1f2d89aa2a2036166fcab4eed752ceb1e6d8c76a85355e2c8e6b" +} +``` From 13bead50f8d76f9571f3d64161bea0548915f528 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: weichen Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 04:45:03 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 10/13] Fill the task record PR link (#329) --- .task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/.task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md b/.task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md index 73ba895b..23004b09 100644 --- a/.task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md +++ b/.task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # feature/generative-ui-u1 任务卡 -任务主记录：；状态：进行中；owner：weichen +任务主记录：modules/documents/docs/proposals/2026-10-10-generative-ui-plugin.md r2（U1 节含结果）；发布 PR：https://git-home.u1680832.nyat.app:30319/weichen/Agent-System-Dev/pulls/329（任务卡与 PR 描述同源）；状态：发布评审中；owner：weichen ## 基线与授权 From a5f43fa50d9db08aca83c61b4d45de8876ed9aed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: weichen Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 04:48:51 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 11/13] Close 1 merged task card(s) and archive them MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Why: branches merged into main had left their task cards open; backfill status and archive to prevent bookkeeping debt. Evidence: feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md(PR#328) — merges verified via git log --merges against origin/main. Impact: .task/*.md moved to .task/archive/ with status backfilled; no code or submodule change. Refs: task.sh close (card-autoclose-r1) --- .../feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) rename .task/{ => archive}/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md (99%) diff --git a/.task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md b/.task/archive/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md similarity index 99% rename from .task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md rename to .task/archive/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md index 51d72e86..f1c68945 100644 --- a/.task/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md +++ b/.task/archive/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # feature/collab-storage-u3-atomicity 任务卡 -任务主记录：Dev PR #328 https://git-home.u1680832.nyat.app:30319/weichen/Agent-System-Dev/pulls/328（backend 组件 PR #140 已合入）；状态：切片 1 实施完成待评审；owner：weichen +任务主记录：Dev PR #328 https://git-home.u1680832.nyat.app:30319/weichen/Agent-System-Dev/pulls/328（backend 组件 PR #140 已合入）；状态：已完成（回填）；owner：weichen ## 基线与授权 @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ | 时间(UTC) | 命令 | 被测HEAD | exit | 来源 | sha256(16) | |---|---|---|---|---|---| -## 结果与验证（完成后填写） +## 结果与验证 - 结果：U3 切片 1 交付——消息追加在会话咨询锁下单事务分配 seq（重试循环降为兜底）；activity_cards v19 版本列 + SaveCardVersioned/GetCardVersion，cardsvc 用户态（status/pin/action/resolveByRef）乐观并发、冲突经既有 writeStoreErr 映射 409，系统镜像保留盲写（版本仍递增）；recovery_holds v20 + admin GET /api/admin/recovery-holds、POST …/{runId}/release + ResumeInterruptedChildren fail-closed 跳过（run 级与会话级）；Redis 限流单 Lua INCR+PEXPIRE（无孤儿键）+ 故障降级进程内保守限流 + Degraded 观测。 - 验证：make test、make test-backend-pg（真 PG 18.6 隔离实例 + Redis）、make build 三段 evidence 全 exit=0（SELF）；CI GATE（test+test-pg）待本 PR 首跑。诚实边界：流式 Append 为同 run 顺序行为保留盲写（与用户裁决并发时以版本冲突暴露给下次读）；ReconcileInterrupted 只改状态不重执行故不设跳过；hold 自动写入触发点随 U5 recovering 状态补齐。 @@ -247,3 +247,9 @@ "receipt_sha256": "c801579c3c3d759b1032d5f0c12371eea8498854263c3e796b78e1cbfaa2caed" } ``` + +## 闭合记录（card-autoclose 回填） + +- 依据：merge b2dd0c845d673fe4f6f12151b492ff96f76fff72（PR #328）已包含于 origin/main，分支成果已落盘；本段为合入后回填。 +- 合并主题：Merge pull request 'U3 slice 1: request atomicity, card versions, atomic rate limit, recovery holds (pin backend #140)' (#328) from feature/collab-storage-u3-atomicity into main +- 归档：随闭合移入 .task/archive/；任务执行期的过程证据见原任务记录与 PR。 From eaee982b80e723f513af0155425667ee7cef2f5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: weichen Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 04:56:21 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 12/13] Record the sync checkpoint Why: bind the task validation checkpoint to the latest integration baseline. Evidence: SELF recursive component checks; sync_base=90c07a5b4fb75251ea72b492ccb6714e5e699fe5; candidate=53682572b904e9744e9a524fcaf2a96efeff3947. Impact: task metadata only. Refs: .task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md --- .task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/.task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md b/.task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md index 23004b09..ad34146d 100644 --- a/.task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md +++ b/.task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md @@ -198,3 +198,4 @@ "receipt_sha256": "76d7a79e322c1f2d89aa2a2036166fcab4eed752ceb1e6d8c76a85355e2c8e6b" } ``` +| 同步前验收 | 90c07a5b4fb75251ea72b492ccb6714e5e699fe5 | 53682572b904e9744e9a524fcaf2a96efeff3947 | 2026-10-11T04:56:21Z | From 7f58e6ed86df16219a205a3af1ff17e2b9d3fa02 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: weichen Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 04:56:22 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 13/13] Record the pre-merge task-sync receipts --- .task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+) diff --git a/.task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md b/.task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md index ad34146d..fb91deac 100644 --- a/.task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md +++ b/.task/feature-generative-ui-u1.md @@ -199,3 +199,41 @@ } ``` | 同步前验收 | 90c07a5b4fb75251ea72b492ccb6714e5e699fe5 | 53682572b904e9744e9a524fcaf2a96efeff3947 | 2026-10-11T04:56:21Z | + + +```json +{ + "schema": 1, + "source": "SELF", + "timestamp": "2026-10-11T04:55:55.826504+00:00", + "command": "make task-sync", + "command_sha256": "6c0e3c8fbb3f43d01548180c9d9c147ce1c1c32ba1e78d3383961de470fe0d52", + "cwd": "/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-generative-ui-u1", + "common_dir": "/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev/.git", + "before": { + "head": "13bead50f8d76f9571f3d64161bea0548915f528", + "branch": "feature/generative-ui-u1", + "target_branch": "main", + "target_head": "90c07a5b4fb75251ea72b492ccb6714e5e699fe5", + "status": "", + "tracked_diff_sha256": "e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855", + "untracked": {}, + "submodules": " 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 deps/agent-command (heads/main)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (remotes/origin/feature/delivery-mechanism-5-ged2af3e)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e deps/agent-squad (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n af199eeaa23c5b39e08b4649f2513d7572dc5274 deps/development-guidelines (heads/main)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n f480c5b5207a183d9f282a57950b6726811bd3f4 modules/backend (v0.3.0-34-gf480c5b)\n 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 modules/backend/deps/agent-command (heads/main)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 modules/backend/deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (remotes/origin/feature/delivery-mechanism-5-ged2af3e)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e modules/backend/deps/agent-squad (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/backend/deps/agent-system-core (v0.3.0)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/core (v0.3.0)\n 336a90f0ade0ffe049879ca5159a61f0a3948708 modules/documents (heads/main)\n 3ed10e122042a64180fb24a42d9cc6438cd2d2d6 modules/frontend (v0.3.0-4-g3ed10e1)\n 76d6633736a7abb36ac1ecca42fe4e6f120d0558 modules/ui (v0.3.0)\n" + }, + "after": { + "head": "eaee982b80e723f513af0155425667ee7cef2f5a", + "branch": "feature/generative-ui-u1", + "target_branch": "main", + "target_head": "90c07a5b4fb75251ea72b492ccb6714e5e699fe5", + "status": "", + "tracked_diff_sha256": "e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855", + "untracked": {}, + "submodules": " 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 deps/agent-command (heads/main)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (remotes/origin/feature/delivery-mechanism-5-ged2af3e)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e deps/agent-squad (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n af199eeaa23c5b39e08b4649f2513d7572dc5274 deps/development-guidelines (heads/main)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 3def5259023806a49ab84f885b7d220333cccde6 modules/backend (v0.3.0-36-g3def525)\n 4f583ca3eeeb07a56a714c5086de84dcd6ad2980 modules/backend/deps/agent-command (heads/main)\n ed2af3e6048928b1fd0ba6da1f9d0c1bafec82d4 modules/backend/deps/agent-command/deps/development-guidelines (remotes/origin/feature/delivery-mechanism-5-ged2af3e)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 490b0b2dfa1567cb16ff7a7230fd78e52bc2938e modules/backend/deps/agent-squad (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n c348441691e8bdab784a03aa9be64d53dacff341 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native (heads/main)\n 343b1e6d9a5b58e47bf7e594826221036ae8175c modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent (heads/main)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/agent-intent/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/agent-native/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/agent-squad/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/backend/deps/agent-system-core (v0.3.0)\n a3ee67bba269e1276c14e22c026171ecf2cf6190 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system (a3ee67b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/error-code-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n 49b5d8be604d05e4246dffa0d10fa1c2b7ad45d7 modules/backend/deps/logging-system (49b5d8b)\n 26b562d2e34fbc560711296a309c91c74ffc55b1 modules/backend/deps/logging-system/deps/development-guidelines (26b562d)\n a253a40b8e5563119b00c4e71fb61fe0d11d6d6a modules/core (v0.3.0)\n 336a90f0ade0ffe049879ca5159a61f0a3948708 modules/documents (heads/main)\n 3ed10e122042a64180fb24a42d9cc6438cd2d2d6 modules/frontend (v0.3.0-4-g3ed10e1)\n 76d6633736a7abb36ac1ecca42fe4e6f120d0558 modules/ui (v0.3.0)\n" + }, + "after_error": null, + "exit_code": 0, + "output": "make[1]: Entering directory '/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-generative-ui-u1'\n[worktree] before-sync: recursive component checks passed\nMerge made by the 'ort' strategy.\n .../archive/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md | 255 +++++++++++++++++++++\n modules/backend | 2 +-\n 2 files changed, 256 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)\n create mode 100644 .task/archive/feature-collab-storage-u3-atomicity.md\n[worktree] before-update: recursive component checks passed\nSubmodule path 'modules/backend': checked out '3def5259023806a49ab84f885b7d220333cccde6'\n[worktree] materialize: recursive component checks passed\n[worktree] after-sync: recursive component checks passed\n[evidence] WARN JSON receipt line 88: recorded HEAD predates non-card changes ——关键检查须重跑并以 make evidence 重新写入\n[evidence] WARN JSON receipt line 127: recorded HEAD predates non-card changes ——关键检查须重跑并以 make evidence 重新写入\n[evidence] WARN JSON receipt line 165: recorded HEAD predates non-card changes ——关键检查须重跑并以 make evidence 重新写入\n[synced] sync_base=90c07a5b4f tested_head=53682572b9 checked_at=2026-10-11T04:56:21Z\n[next] 跑正式验收（make test 等），证据写入任务卡\nmake[1]: Leaving directory '/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-generative-ui-u1'\n", + "output_sha256": "15fca0549b86021fa2e65bd6cc1e49391eb7c7fd4fbac7177dcca6d9e4c7e0e5", + "receipt_sha256": "3f3be645acad382c69e3c611cce26b39231c611528bf97d2445c852400c8a941" +} +```