Why: main advanced with merged-task-name and legacy evidence guards during this task.
Evidence: SELF 44 lifecycle regressions pass after resolving both hunks; independent review repairs are recorded in the task card.
Impact: retains both task-start protections and the stronger JSON/legacy receipt reader, without rewriting either branch history.
Refs: Dev PR #211 and #212; .task/feature-governance-reliability.md
Why: independent review found shared submodule metadata risk, quoted header leakage, stale JSON receipt blindness and missing abandon coverage.
Evidence: SELF 92 governance regressions pass; the original review receipt and replay output are recorded in the task card.
Impact: preserves external component worktrees, handles both evidence formats and adds targeted failure-path coverage; no product behavior changes.
Refs: .task/feature-governance-reliability.md; .task/reviews/governance-reliability.json
Why: cleanup, component synchronization, receipt recording and credential handling could contradict the documented development boundaries.
Evidence: SELF 75 isolated governance tests and source checks are captured in .task/feature-governance-reliability.md; combination and CI verification follow.
Impact: hardens local task and CI tooling, aligns policy and component documentation, and adds continuous regression tests without changing product behavior.
Refs: .task/feature-governance-reliability.md; policy/governance.md; policy/platform-admission.md
weichen