weichenandCursor a672adb7aa Revise the fast-slow r2 proposal after review ...

Why: stages 1-4 needed spec conflicts closed before another review, without treating the agent review as approval.
Evidence: SELF consistency check over NB01-NB24; product tests NOT_RUN.
Impact: proposal text only. Review status stays unreviewed. No business code.
Refs: docs/proposals/2026-10-15-fast-slow-r2-nonblocking.md
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

2026-10-15 05:56:20 +00:00

..

guides

Document the storage-migrate tool and the switch/drill runbook (U4)

2026-10-11 08:29:38 +00:00

proposals

Revise the fast-slow r2 proposal after review

2026-10-15 05:56:20 +00:00

records

Describe controlled manual merge queue expansion

2026-10-14 14:20:34 +00:00

reports

Document the dual-tier storage

2026-09-30 02:39:50 +00:00