Why: real run run_b520bf2e3037 showed the user-facing reply being displaced by
internal bookkeeping - the fact-check correction round's closing text plus the
same-source verifier skip notice became the visible answer while the actual
summary was folded into the process timeline (frontend splits at the last
process part). Same tail pollution reproduced on every same-model run since.
Evidence: go test ./... -count=1 green (32 pkgs); new regression tests cover
the demotion of the pre-check summary and the skip notice becoming a check
part; three old-contract tests updated to assert notices land as process
checks instead of final text.
Impact: stop() fact-check branch now demotes the standing summary (aligned
with the gate and cap branches) and asks the model for a fresh full reply;
verifier errors record as process checks (pass-state for same-source skip,
fail-state for real errors) instead of StopDecision.Notice text; the cap
notice likewise becomes a failed check line.
Refs: Dev task feature/final-reply-pollution-fix; diagnosis in
.task/feature-dual-speed-tasks.md lineage and session analysis 2026-10-10.
weichen
merged commit c6912b63e7 into main2026-10-10 07:56:41 +00:00
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Why: 实测 run_b520bf2e3037 及此后所有同源验证运行的最终回复被内部过程文本顶掉——事实核查修正轮的收尾文本与同源跳过提示成为用户可见答复，正式总结被折叠进过程时间线（2026-10-10 用户实测反馈问题 1）。
改动：
Evidence: go test ./... -count=1 全绿（32 包）；新增两条回归测试（修正轮降级旧总结+可见文本只剩续写收尾；跳过提示为检查行且不泄漏正文）；三个旧契约测试更新为断言新契约。真实模型前后对照见 Dev 任务卡。
Refs: Dev 任务 feature/final-reply-pollution-fix。