Record the U1 trial: harness, results, and task-card outcomes

Why: The U1 controlled trial finished; its fixtures, validator, runner,
per-run results, report, and renderer spike must be reviewable from the
task branch, and the task card needs the final PASS/FAIL record.

Evidence: results/summary.json + report.md (SELF, MiniMax official
channel, CNY 3 of 200 cap); make evidence receipts for precheck,
task-sync, and make test follow in this branch.

Impact: Task-scoped experiment artifacts only (.task/genui-u1/); no
production code changes.

Refs: Documents PR #62 (proposal r2); task card feature/generative-ui-u1
This commit is contained in:
2026-10-11 04:43:03 +00:00
parent e89d412821
commit 1c25d65ae9
84 changed files with 11300 additions and 34 deletions
+26 -31
View File
@@ -7,54 +7,49 @@
- 权威仓:ssh://git@git-ssh.u1680832.nyat.app:31411/weichen/Agent-System-Dev.git;目标分支:main;R0(initial_base_sha)= 5771d4f1e5b692bce95eb64cc30dc9931079ad12
- 工作区:/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-generative-ui-u1(worktree);分支:feature/generative-ui-u1
- 授权与交付终点:<本次允许的动作与终点;未授权事项写明>
- 授权与交付终点:用户 2026-10-11 指示「开工」,启动 U1 受控价值与选型试验(r1 主记录 U1 节;参数经同日裁定:模型限 MiniMax M3+M2.7-highspeed、材料限合成样本、费用上限 ¥200)。允许:实验目录内搭建与运行、真实模型调用(预算护栏内)、Documents 提交 r2 修订、发布合入与任务闭环。不允许:生产代码改动、替换生产路径、超预算试验、部署。
- 交付模式:manual(逐阶段人工评审);明确授权后可记为 authorized-continuous
- 自动推进授权:无;授权范围:无;授权来源:无;授权终点:无;停止条件:无(未授权)
- 当前阶段:需求拆解;当前增量:I1(待定义)
- 当前阶段:试验实施与自检;当前增量:I1 试验搭建与运行(.task/genui-u1/)
- 流程依据:仓库根目录 policy/delivery.md(归档后仍按仓库根目录定位)
## 目标与非目标
<预期结果、受影响入口/模块/契约;明确不做什么。>
目标:U1 三臂对照(B=Markdown 基线 / G=UINode 生成 / G-hs=轻量档子集)产出可判定指标(规格有效率、R1 结构分化、结构契合、来源覆盖、token 成本),加 json-render/A2UI renderer 选型挑战,输出 A/B 报告与 r2 修订要点。非目标:业务代码改动、生产路径替换、人类可用性对照(NOT_RUN,留人工评审)。
## 关联方向与规划
- 适用状态:待核对(无适用规划时说明原因)
- 主记录路径/版本:待核对(路径按仓库根目录定位,归档后不变;只引用唯一正文)
- 对应里程碑:待核对
- 适用状态:Generative UI 方向 U1 增量(首个实施候选)
- 主记录路径/版本:modules/documents/docs/proposals/2026-10-10-generative-ui-plugin.md r1(U1 节 + 2026-10-11 用户裁定记录)
- 对应里程碑:U1 受控价值与选型试验;后续 U2–U4 视结果决定
## 需求分析
| ID | 描述 | 项目符合度及依据 | 优先级 | 验收条件 | 依赖 | 结论 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 待填写 | 待评估 | 待定 | 待定义 | 待确认 | 待评审 |
| R1 | 同料不同目标结构分化可测 | 符合:夹具含两组同料三目标 | P0 | facts-A/B 组类型多重集分化指标 | 夹具+生成臂 | 本轮纳入 |
| R4 | 生成规格贴合 16 类词汇与硬限制 | 符合:校验器对齐 core/ui.go | P0 | 首次合法 ≥90%、修复后 ≥98%(建议目标) | 生成臂 | 本轮纳入 |
| R10 | 真实模型成本与成功率证据 | 符合:MiniMax 官方通道实测 | P0 | 每任务 token/费用/调用数可复核 | 模型通道 | 本轮纳入 |
## 方案与计划
- 方案引用:待填写(含对象版本)
- 实施计划引用:待填写(含增量与需求 ID)
- 测试计划引用:待填写(含需求 ID 与验收条件)
- 方案引用:r1 主记录 U1 节;试验协议 .task/genui-u1/README.md
- 实施计划引用:I1 试验搭建运行 → I2 报告与 r2 修订 → 发布闭环;对应 R1/R4/R10
- 测试计划引用:评分器 score.py 输出 summary.json;人类可用性对照 NOT_RUN
## 阶段评审
| 阶段 | 对象版本 | 结论 | 评审人 | 时间 | 依据 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 需求拆解 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — |
| 需求评估 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — |
| 需求表确认 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — |
| 方案设计 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — |
| 实施计划 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — |
| 实施与自检 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — |
| 正式测试与验收 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — |
| 代码 Review | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — |
| 合入 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — |
| 合入核验与收口 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — |
| 需求拆解 | U1 试验指标集 | 按裁定执行 | weichen(开工指令) | 2026-10-11 | r1 裁定记录 |
| 实施与自检 | .task/genui-u1/(report.md v1) | 完成(SELF;CI 随发布 PR 为 GATE) | — | 2026-10-11 | 三臂+两探针全部执行;首轮 harness 截断缺陷发现→修复→重跑并记录(报告第六节) |
## 探索试验与迭代
| 增量/试验 | 假设 | 范围 | 判断和停止条件 | 批准依据 | 结果 | 变更影响 | 需重审补测 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 待定义 | — | — | — | 未批准 | NOT_RUN | 待评估 | 待评估 |
| U1-A 三臂生成对照 | 动态组合规格可用且成本可控 | 30 任务×B/G + 10×G-hs;≤60 调用/臂;≤¥200 | r1 U1 判据;超限即停 | 2026-10-11 裁定+开工指令 | 完成:R1 分化 6/6;G 首过 60%/修复后 83%(文本通道下界,工具通道探针消除语法类失败);成本 ≈¥3.0;highspeed 生成档否决(20%) | 报告+r2 修订 5 条 | 人类可用性对照 NOT_RUN;工具通道全量重验留 U3 |
| U1-B renderer 挑战 | 外部 renderer 显著省维护成本 | json-render 端到端 spike + A2UI 结构评估(/tmp 隔离) | 显著减少总维护成本才采用 | 同上 | 完成:首期不引入(json-render 契约重+运行时重叠;A2UI 需 DOM+客户端绑定冲突) | U2 借 schema 驱动目录 | U5 交互期重评 json-render |
## 同步记录
@@ -70,19 +65,19 @@
## 结果与验证(完成后填写)
- 结果:
- 验证:<结论摘要 PASS/FAIL/SKIP/NOT_RUN 逐项;逐条证据由 make evidence 写入上方证据表>
- 影响与剩余项:
- 结果:U1 完成——三臂对照 + renderer 挑战 + 两通道探针;主报告 .task/genui-u1/report.md;总开销 ≈¥3.0(上限 ¥200);无生产代码改动。
- 验证:R1 分化 PASS(6/6,Jaccard 0.17–0.50);规格有效率文本通道 60%/83%(低于 90%/98% 目标,归因 JSON 语法类,工具通道探针 PASS 证明可消除);结构契合 0.66(评分口径保守);来源覆盖 0.87 PASS;成本 PASS;highspeed 生成档 FAIL(20%)→ r2 否决该用途;renderer 结论:首期自研(PASS 判定成立)。人类可用性对照 NOT_RUN;CI GATE 随发布 PR。
- 影响与剩余项:r1 升 r2(工具通道硬约束、目录含最小示例与按目标收窄、schema 驱动校验、生成=M3、有效率目标移 U3);U2 契约细化时采纳;人类对照与工具通道全量重验留 U3。
## 规划进展与下一步
- 本次推进/剩余:待核对(依据实际成果更新适用方案/规划)
- 首选下一任务:待核对(无适用规划、已完成或受阻时如实说明,不虚构任务)
- 推荐依据:待填写
- 前置条件/待确认:待核对
- 预期产物/验收条件:待定义
- 重复任务核对:待核对(已有/在途任务、PR 与规划记录)
- 启动授权:未授权(建议不自动启动新任务,仍须明确授权)
- 本次推进/剩余:U1 试验完成并回填 r2;主记录由 r1 升 r2(Documents PR)。
- 首选下一任务:U2 通用契约、启禁与持久化(依赖 U1 设计评审,本轮即其输入)
- 推荐依据:R1 分化与成本证据支持继续;生成通道定型工具参数;首期自研 renderer。
- 前置条件/待确认:U2 精确 API/迁移设计随任务启动评审;真实模型任务级前后对照按 policy/delivery.md 在 U3 执行。
- 预期产物/验收条件:主记录 U2 节(旧消费者可用、关闭态不绕过、并发冲突、故障恢复、SQLite/PG 一致)。
- 重复任务核对:本卡启动时 precheck 无同名卡;Dev/Documents open PR 于 r1 发布时核查为空,本轮未新增冲突任务。
- 启动授权:U2 未启动(发布本卡后按用户指令开新任务)
## 合入与清理
+46
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
# U1 受控价值与选型试验(原型,任务 feature/generative-ui-u1)
依据:`modules/documents/docs/proposals/2026-10-10-generative-ui-plugin.md` U1 节;
试验参数经用户 2026-10-11 裁定(模型限 MiniMax M3 + M2.7-highspeed;材料限合成样本;
费用上限 ¥200)。本目录全部为原型实验件,不接入生产路径,不修改业务代码。
## 协议
- **任务集**:`fixtures.json`(seed 20261011,确定性生成)。30 个固定任务:
research-compare(rc)×10、task-overview(to)×10、requirement-input(ri)×10。
rc 内两组「同料不同目标」(facts-A/B:compare/risk/order 三目标共享同一材料)用于 R1 结构分化检验。
- **臂**:
- `B`(基线):材料+目标 → Markdown 卡片(当前系统 submit_card 形态)。30 任务 ×1 次调用。
- `G`(生成):同一材料+目标 + 16 类 UINode 目录与硬限制 → JSON 页面规格;
校验失败带错误至多重提一次(KTD2 约定)。30 任务 ×(1+≤1 修复)。
- `G-hs`(轻量档子集):同 G 协议换 MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed,取前 10 任务对照成本/质量。
- **模型通道**:`https://api.minimaxi.com/v1`(OpenAI 兼容;与 dev 实例 settings 同源),
密钥经环境 `MINIMAX_API_KEY` 注入,不入仓。温度 0.3。
- **校验器**(`harness.py::validate_spec`)对齐 `modules/core/ui.go` 16 类词汇:
未知类型/字段、非法 props、重复/非法 nodeId、引用不存在的 sourceId、>200 节点、>8 层、
>256KiB 均判无效(KTD5 纪律)。
- **护栏**:单臂调用上限 B=60 / G=60 / G-hs=20;预算 >¥200 即停(`run_trial.py` 每次调用前核算)。
成本单价取 E5 任务卡记录(M3 $0.3/$1.2、hs $0.6/$2.4 每 M tokens 入/出,汇率 7.2,不计缓存折扣——保守)。
## 运行
```bash
export MINIMAX_API_KEY=… # 运行时从 dev 实例 settings 取,不落盘
python3 gen_fixtures.py # 已生成并提交;重跑逐字节一致
python3 run_trial.py --arm B
python3 run_trial.py --arm G
python3 run_trial.py --arm G-hs
python3 score.py # → results/summary.json
```
断点续跑:`results/<arm>/<task>.json` 已完成即跳过。原始模型全文只存 `results/`
(合成材料,无真实数据;按 r1 约定评测原始材料不进 Documents)。
## 判据(对齐 r1「试点评价方法」可自动化部分)
- 规格有效率:G 首次合法 ≥90%、修复一次后 ≥98%(r1 建议目标)。
- R1 结构分化:同料不同目标的类型多重集 Jaccard 与主类型差异。
- 结构契合:预期节点类型出现比例(按族/目标)。
- 来源可追溯:specs 引用的 sourceId 覆盖率;幻觉引用(校验前)计数。
- 成本/延迟:每任务 token(含 cached 口径)与折算费用;B 对照。
- 人类可用性对照(完成耗时/满意度)不在本轮自动化范围,标注 NOT_RUN,留后续人工评审。
+805
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,805 @@
{
"seed": 20261011,
"tasks": [
{
"id": "rc-01",
"family": "research-compare",
"sharedGroup": "facts-A",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1",
"text": "VaultKeep:权限中枢类工具,2022-08 上线。\n核心能力:RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换。\n报价 ¥15/人/天;部署形态:国密支持。\n近半年发布 7 次,平均修复周期 3 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2",
"text": "LarkPipe:消息管道类工具,2019-03 上线。\n核心能力:Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量。\n报价 ¥5/人/天;部署形态:仅 SaaS。\n近半年发布 2 次,平均修复周期 1 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3",
"text": "NexusGrid:数据表格类工具,2021-11 上线。\n核心能力:虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel。\n报价 ¥12/人/天;部署形态:私有化可选。\n近半年发布 7 次,平均修复周期 4 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo",
"text": "尽调风险备忘(内部):\n- 供应商锁定(中):私有 API 占比 40%\n- 培训成本(低):界面术语与现有系统不一致\n- 升级断层(中):近两季度仅小版本"
}
],
"goal": "给决策会准备一页选型对比:突出三者的能力、价格与部署差异,给出你的建议与理由。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"compare",
"table"
],
"goalKind": "compare"
}
},
{
"id": "rc-02",
"family": "research-compare",
"sharedGroup": "facts-A",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1",
"text": "VaultKeep:权限中枢类工具,2022-08 上线。\n核心能力:RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换。\n报价 ¥15/人/天;部署形态:国密支持。\n近半年发布 7 次,平均修复周期 3 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2",
"text": "LarkPipe:消息管道类工具,2019-03 上线。\n核心能力:Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量。\n报价 ¥5/人/天;部署形态:仅 SaaS。\n近半年发布 2 次,平均修复周期 1 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3",
"text": "NexusGrid:数据表格类工具,2021-11 上线。\n核心能力:虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel。\n报价 ¥12/人/天;部署形态:私有化可选。\n近半年发布 7 次,平均修复周期 4 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo",
"text": "尽调风险备忘(内部):\n- 供应商锁定(中):私有 API 占比 40%\n- 培训成本(低):界面术语与现有系统不一致\n- 升级断层(中):近两季度仅小版本"
}
],
"goal": "给风控评审准备风险分析页:把风险按严重度组织,标注每条风险的来源与你的判断。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"timeline",
"list",
"kv"
],
"goalKind": "risk"
}
},
{
"id": "rc-03",
"family": "research-compare",
"sharedGroup": "facts-A",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1",
"text": "VaultKeep:权限中枢类工具,2022-08 上线。\n核心能力:RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换。\n报价 ¥15/人/天;部署形态:国密支持。\n近半年发布 7 次,平均修复周期 3 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2",
"text": "LarkPipe:消息管道类工具,2019-03 上线。\n核心能力:Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量。\n报价 ¥5/人/天;部署形态:仅 SaaS。\n近半年发布 2 次,平均修复周期 1 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3",
"text": "NexusGrid:数据表格类工具,2021-11 上线。\n核心能力:虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel。\n报价 ¥12/人/天;部署形态:私有化可选。\n近半年发布 7 次,平均修复周期 4 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo",
"text": "尽调风险备忘(内部):\n- 供应商锁定(中):私有 API 占比 40%\n- 培训成本(低):界面术语与现有系统不一致\n- 升级断层(中):近两季度仅小版本"
}
],
"goal": "规划评审后的实施顺序:分阶段列出步骤、依赖与里程碑。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"steps",
"timeline"
],
"goalKind": "order"
}
},
{
"id": "rc-04",
"family": "research-compare",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-04/vendor1",
"text": "NexusGrid:数据表格类工具,2021-11 上线。\n核心能力:虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel。\n报价 ¥12/人/天;部署形态:私有化可选。\n近半年发布 9 次,平均修复周期 5 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-04/vendor2",
"text": "LarkPipe:消息管道类工具,2019-03 上线。\n核心能力:Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量。\n报价 ¥5/人/天;部署形态:仅 SaaS。\n近半年发布 6 次,平均修复周期 1 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-04/vendor3",
"text": "VaultKeep:权限中枢类工具,2022-08 上线。\n核心能力:RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换。\n报价 ¥15/人/天;部署形态:国密支持。\n近半年发布 4 次,平均修复周期 3 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-04/riskmemo",
"text": "尽调风险备忘(内部):\n- 合规缺口(高):数据出境条款未覆盖\n- 升级断层(中):近两季度仅小版本\n- 培训成本(低):界面术语与现有系统不一致"
}
],
"goal": "给风控评审准备风险分析页:把风险按严重度组织,标注每条风险的来源与你的判断。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"timeline",
"list",
"kv"
],
"goalKind": "risk"
}
},
{
"id": "rc-05",
"family": "research-compare",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-05/vendor1",
"text": "FlowSync:流程编排类工具,2023-05 上线。\n核心能力:拖拽画布、审批链、REST 连接器。\n报价 ¥8/人/天;部署形态:SSO, 审计日志。\n近半年发布 5 次,平均修复周期 3 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-05/vendor2",
"text": "NexusGrid:数据表格类工具,2021-11 上线。\n核心能力:虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel。\n报价 ¥12/人/天;部署形态:私有化可选。\n近半年发布 5 次,平均修复周期 3 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-05/vendor3",
"text": "LarkPipe:消息管道类工具,2019-03 上线。\n核心能力:Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量。\n报价 ¥5/人/天;部署形态:仅 SaaS。\n近半年发布 3 次,平均修复周期 2 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-05/riskmemo",
"text": "尽调风险备忘(内部):\n- 合规缺口(高):数据出境条款未覆盖\n- 供应商锁定(中):私有 API 占比 40%\n- 性能未验证(高):万行表格场景无官方基准"
}
],
"goal": "规划评审后的实施顺序:分阶段列出步骤、依赖与里程碑。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"steps",
"timeline"
],
"goalKind": "order"
}
},
{
"id": "rc-06",
"family": "research-compare",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-06/vendor1",
"text": "LarkPipe:消息管道类工具,2019-03 上线。\n核心能力:Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量。\n报价 ¥5/人/天;部署形态:仅 SaaS。\n近半年发布 6 次,平均修复周期 3 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-06/vendor2",
"text": "EchoDocs:文档协同类工具,2020-06 上线。\n核心能力:批注、版本链、全文检索。\n报价 ¥9/人/天;部署形态:无离线。\n近半年发布 9 次,平均修复周期 2 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-06/vendor3",
"text": "NexusGrid:数据表格类工具,2021-11 上线。\n核心能力:虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel。\n报价 ¥12/人/天;部署形态:私有化可选。\n近半年发布 5 次,平均修复周期 1 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-06/riskmemo",
"text": "尽调风险备忘(内部):\n- 供应商锁定(中):私有 API 占比 40%\n- 性能未验证(高):万行表格场景无官方基准\n- 培训成本(低):界面术语与现有系统不一致"
}
],
"goal": "给决策会准备一页选型对比:突出三者的能力、价格与部署差异,给出你的建议与理由。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"compare",
"table"
],
"goalKind": "compare"
}
},
{
"id": "rc-07",
"family": "research-compare",
"sharedGroup": "facts-B",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1",
"text": "LarkPipe:消息管道类工具,2019-03 上线。\n核心能力:Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量。\n报价 ¥5/人/天;部署形态:仅 SaaS。\n近半年发布 7 次,平均修复周期 2 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2",
"text": "VaultKeep:权限中枢类工具,2022-08 上线。\n核心能力:RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换。\n报价 ¥15/人/天;部署形态:国密支持。\n近半年发布 4 次,平均修复周期 4 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3",
"text": "EchoDocs:文档协同类工具,2020-06 上线。\n核心能力:批注、版本链、全文检索。\n报价 ¥9/人/天;部署形态:无离线。\n近半年发布 2 次,平均修复周期 1 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo",
"text": "尽调风险备忘(内部):\n- 性能未验证(高):万行表格场景无官方基准\n- 培训成本(低):界面术语与现有系统不一致\n- 供应商锁定(中):私有 API 占比 40%"
}
],
"goal": "给决策会准备一页选型对比:突出三者的能力、价格与部署差异,给出你的建议与理由。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"compare",
"table"
],
"goalKind": "compare"
}
},
{
"id": "rc-08",
"family": "research-compare",
"sharedGroup": "facts-B",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1",
"text": "LarkPipe:消息管道类工具,2019-03 上线。\n核心能力:Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量。\n报价 ¥5/人/天;部署形态:仅 SaaS。\n近半年发布 7 次,平均修复周期 2 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2",
"text": "VaultKeep:权限中枢类工具,2022-08 上线。\n核心能力:RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换。\n报价 ¥15/人/天;部署形态:国密支持。\n近半年发布 4 次,平均修复周期 4 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3",
"text": "EchoDocs:文档协同类工具,2020-06 上线。\n核心能力:批注、版本链、全文检索。\n报价 ¥9/人/天;部署形态:无离线。\n近半年发布 2 次,平均修复周期 1 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo",
"text": "尽调风险备忘(内部):\n- 性能未验证(高):万行表格场景无官方基准\n- 培训成本(低):界面术语与现有系统不一致\n- 供应商锁定(中):私有 API 占比 40%"
}
],
"goal": "给风控评审准备风险分析页:把风险按严重度组织,标注每条风险的来源与你的判断。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"timeline",
"list",
"kv"
],
"goalKind": "risk"
}
},
{
"id": "rc-09",
"family": "research-compare",
"sharedGroup": "facts-B",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1",
"text": "LarkPipe:消息管道类工具,2019-03 上线。\n核心能力:Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量。\n报价 ¥5/人/天;部署形态:仅 SaaS。\n近半年发布 7 次,平均修复周期 2 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2",
"text": "VaultKeep:权限中枢类工具,2022-08 上线。\n核心能力:RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换。\n报价 ¥15/人/天;部署形态:国密支持。\n近半年发布 4 次,平均修复周期 4 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3",
"text": "EchoDocs:文档协同类工具,2020-06 上线。\n核心能力:批注、版本链、全文检索。\n报价 ¥9/人/天;部署形态:无离线。\n近半年发布 2 次,平均修复周期 1 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo",
"text": "尽调风险备忘(内部):\n- 性能未验证(高):万行表格场景无官方基准\n- 培训成本(低):界面术语与现有系统不一致\n- 供应商锁定(中):私有 API 占比 40%"
}
],
"goal": "规划评审后的实施顺序:分阶段列出步骤、依赖与里程碑。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"steps",
"timeline"
],
"goalKind": "order"
}
},
{
"id": "rc-10",
"family": "research-compare",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-10/vendor1",
"text": "EchoDocs:文档协同类工具,2020-06 上线。\n核心能力:批注、版本链、全文检索。\n报价 ¥9/人/天;部署形态:无离线。\n近半年发布 4 次,平均修复周期 3 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-10/vendor2",
"text": "NexusGrid:数据表格类工具,2021-11 上线。\n核心能力:虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel。\n报价 ¥12/人/天;部署形态:私有化可选。\n近半年发布 6 次,平均修复周期 3 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-10/vendor3",
"text": "VaultKeep:权限中枢类工具,2022-08 上线。\n核心能力:RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换。\n报价 ¥15/人/天;部署形态:国密支持。\n近半年发布 6 次,平均修复周期 5 天。"
},
{
"sourceId": "doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo",
"text": "尽调风险备忘(内部):\n- 升级断层(中):近两季度仅小版本\n- 性能未验证(高):万行表格场景无官方基准\n- 培训成本(低):界面术语与现有系统不一致"
}
],
"goal": "给风控评审准备风险分析页:把风险按严重度组织,标注每条风险的来源与你的判断。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"timeline",
"list",
"kv"
],
"goalKind": "risk"
}
},
{
"id": "ri-01",
"family": "requirement-input",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "req:eval/ri-00/context",
"text": "背景:把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套,预算上限 40 万,期望 Q1 上线。\n干系人:财务(审批人)、行政(发起人)、IT(运维);法务事后复核合同。\n已定:保留移动端入口;审批链最多 5 级;历史数据只读归档。"
},
{
"sourceId": "req:eval/ri-00/open",
"text": "待决问题清单:\n- 供应商是否要求驻场实施?\n- 并发审批上限:50 还是 200?\n- 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度?\n- 验收标准由谁签署:财务还是行政?"
}
],
"goal": "把待决问题组织成可填写的表单页,标注必填与选项,方便我一次收集完。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"form"
],
"goalKind": "collect"
}
},
{
"id": "ri-02",
"family": "requirement-input",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "req:eval/ri-01/context",
"text": "背景:把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套,预算上限 40 万,期望 Q1 上线。\n干系人:财务(审批人)、行政(发起人)、IT(运维);法务事后复核合同。\n已定:保留移动端入口;审批链最多 5 级;历史数据只读归档。"
},
{
"sourceId": "req:eval/ri-01/open",
"text": "待决问题清单:\n- 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度?\n- 并发审批上限:50 还是 200?\n- 归档年限未定:3 年还是 5 年?\n- 供应商是否要求驻场实施?"
}
],
"goal": "把已定约束与待决事项分开呈现,给我一页能逐项确认的范围页。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"kv",
"compare",
"list"
],
"goalKind": "confirm"
}
},
{
"id": "ri-03",
"family": "requirement-input",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "req:eval/ri-02/context",
"text": "背景:把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套,预算上限 40 万,期望 Q1 上线。\n干系人:财务(审批人)、行政(发起人)、IT(运维);法务事后复核合同。\n已定:保留移动端入口;审批链最多 5 级;历史数据只读归档。"
},
{
"sourceId": "req:eval/ri-02/open",
"text": "待决问题清单:\n- 验收标准由谁签署:财务还是行政?\n- 并发审批上限:50 还是 200?\n- 供应商是否要求驻场实施?\n- 归档年限未定:3 年还是 5 年?"
}
],
"goal": "把待决问题组织成可填写的表单页,标注必填与选项,方便我一次收集完。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"form"
],
"goalKind": "collect"
}
},
{
"id": "ri-04",
"family": "requirement-input",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "req:eval/ri-03/context",
"text": "背景:把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套,预算上限 40 万,期望 Q1 上线。\n干系人:财务(审批人)、行政(发起人)、IT(运维);法务事后复核合同。\n已定:保留移动端入口;审批链最多 5 级;历史数据只读归档。"
},
{
"sourceId": "req:eval/ri-03/open",
"text": "待决问题清单:\n- 是否需要纸质兜底流程?行政坚持,IT 反对。\n- 验收标准由谁签署:财务还是行政?\n- 并发审批上限:50 还是 200?\n- 供应商是否要求驻场实施?"
}
],
"goal": "把已定约束与待决事项分开呈现,给我一页能逐项确认的范围页。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"kv",
"compare",
"list"
],
"goalKind": "confirm"
}
},
{
"id": "ri-05",
"family": "requirement-input",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "req:eval/ri-04/context",
"text": "背景:把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套,预算上限 40 万,期望 Q1 上线。\n干系人:财务(审批人)、行政(发起人)、IT(运维);法务事后复核合同。\n已定:保留移动端入口;审批链最多 5 级;历史数据只读归档。"
},
{
"sourceId": "req:eval/ri-04/open",
"text": "待决问题清单:\n- 验收标准由谁签署:财务还是行政?\n- 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度?\n- 并发审批上限:50 还是 200?\n- 供应商是否要求驻场实施?"
}
],
"goal": "把待决问题组织成可填写的表单页,标注必填与选项,方便我一次收集完。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"form"
],
"goalKind": "collect"
}
},
{
"id": "ri-06",
"family": "requirement-input",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "req:eval/ri-05/context",
"text": "背景:把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套,预算上限 40 万,期望 Q1 上线。\n干系人:财务(审批人)、行政(发起人)、IT(运维);法务事后复核合同。\n已定:保留移动端入口;审批链最多 5 级;历史数据只读归档。"
},
{
"sourceId": "req:eval/ri-05/open",
"text": "待决问题清单:\n- 是否需要纸质兜底流程?行政坚持,IT 反对。\n- 验收标准由谁签署:财务还是行政?\n- 供应商是否要求驻场实施?\n- 归档年限未定:3 年还是 5 年?"
}
],
"goal": "把已定约束与待决事项分开呈现,给我一页能逐项确认的范围页。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"kv",
"compare",
"list"
],
"goalKind": "confirm"
}
},
{
"id": "ri-07",
"family": "requirement-input",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "req:eval/ri-06/context",
"text": "背景:把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套,预算上限 40 万,期望 Q1 上线。\n干系人:财务(审批人)、行政(发起人)、IT(运维);法务事后复核合同。\n已定:保留移动端入口;审批链最多 5 级;历史数据只读归档。"
},
{
"sourceId": "req:eval/ri-06/open",
"text": "待决问题清单:\n- 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度?\n- 验收标准由谁签署:财务还是行政?\n- 供应商是否要求驻场实施?\n- 并发审批上限:50 还是 200?"
}
],
"goal": "把待决问题组织成可填写的表单页,标注必填与选项,方便我一次收集完。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"form"
],
"goalKind": "collect"
}
},
{
"id": "ri-08",
"family": "requirement-input",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "req:eval/ri-07/context",
"text": "背景:把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套,预算上限 40 万,期望 Q1 上线。\n干系人:财务(审批人)、行政(发起人)、IT(运维);法务事后复核合同。\n已定:保留移动端入口;审批链最多 5 级;历史数据只读归档。"
},
{
"sourceId": "req:eval/ri-07/open",
"text": "待决问题清单:\n- 并发审批上限:50 还是 200?\n- 验收标准由谁签署:财务还是行政?\n- 是否需要纸质兜底流程?行政坚持,IT 反对。\n- 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度?"
}
],
"goal": "把已定约束与待决事项分开呈现,给我一页能逐项确认的范围页。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"kv",
"compare",
"list"
],
"goalKind": "confirm"
}
},
{
"id": "ri-09",
"family": "requirement-input",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "req:eval/ri-08/context",
"text": "背景:把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套,预算上限 40 万,期望 Q1 上线。\n干系人:财务(审批人)、行政(发起人)、IT(运维);法务事后复核合同。\n已定:保留移动端入口;审批链最多 5 级;历史数据只读归档。"
},
{
"sourceId": "req:eval/ri-08/open",
"text": "待决问题清单:\n- 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度?\n- 归档年限未定:3 年还是 5 年?\n- 供应商是否要求驻场实施?\n- 是否需要纸质兜底流程?行政坚持,IT 反对。"
}
],
"goal": "把待决问题组织成可填写的表单页,标注必填与选项,方便我一次收集完。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"form"
],
"goalKind": "collect"
}
},
{
"id": "ri-10",
"family": "requirement-input",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "req:eval/ri-09/context",
"text": "背景:把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套,预算上限 40 万,期望 Q1 上线。\n干系人:财务(审批人)、行政(发起人)、IT(运维);法务事后复核合同。\n已定:保留移动端入口;审批链最多 5 级;历史数据只读归档。"
},
{
"sourceId": "req:eval/ri-09/open",
"text": "待决问题清单:\n- 归档年限未定:3 年还是 5 年?\n- 并发审批上限:50 还是 200?\n- 是否需要纸质兜底流程?行政坚持,IT 反对。\n- 供应商是否要求驻场实施?"
}
],
"goal": "把已定约束与待决事项分开呈现,给我一页能逐项确认的范围页。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"kv",
"compare",
"list"
],
"goalKind": "confirm"
}
},
{
"id": "to-01",
"family": "task-overview",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-00/steps",
"text": "任务「交付门禁自动化」步骤:\n- 需求冻结:done\n- 契约定义:done\n- 存储迁移:in_progress\n- 灰度开关:pending\n- 回退演练:pending"
},
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-00/log",
"text": "最近动态:\n- 10-08 09:12 存储迁移脚本在预发跑通,耗时 14m\n- 10-09 15:40 灰度开关等待安全评审排期\n- 10-10 11:05 回退演练草案提交,缺少数据校验步骤\n- 10-11 10:30 契约定义评审通过,两处字段口径修订"
},
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-00/artifacts",
"text": "产物:\n- 需求清单 v3(doc)\n- 迁移脚本 runbook(doc)\n- 评审纪要 10-11(doc)"
}
],
"goal": "我要快速看这个任务做到哪了、下一步是什么。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"steps",
"progress",
"kv"
],
"goalKind": "progress"
}
},
{
"id": "to-02",
"family": "task-overview",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-01/steps",
"text": "任务「交付门禁自动化」步骤:\n- 需求冻结:done\n- 契约定义:done\n- 存储迁移:in_progress\n- 灰度开关:pending\n- 回退演练:pending"
},
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-01/log",
"text": "最近动态:\n- 10-08 09:12 存储迁移脚本在预发跑通,耗时 14m\n- 10-09 15:40 灰度开关等待安全评审排期\n- 10-10 11:05 回退演练草案提交,缺少数据校验步骤\n- 10-11 10:30 契约定义评审通过,两处字段口径修订"
},
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-01/artifacts",
"text": "产物:\n- 需求清单 v3(doc)\n- 迁移脚本 runbook(doc)\n- 评审纪要 10-11(doc)"
}
],
"goal": "给我风险与欠账视图:哪里卡住了、缺什么、有什么过期项。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"timeline",
"list",
"kv"
],
"goalKind": "risk"
}
},
{
"id": "to-03",
"family": "task-overview",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-02/steps",
"text": "任务「交付门禁自动化」步骤:\n- 需求冻结:done\n- 契约定义:done\n- 存储迁移:in_progress\n- 灰度开关:pending\n- 回退演练:pending"
},
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-02/log",
"text": "最近动态:\n- 10-08 09:12 存储迁移脚本在预发跑通,耗时 14m\n- 10-09 15:40 灰度开关等待安全评审排期\n- 10-10 11:05 回退演练草案提交,缺少数据校验步骤\n- 10-11 10:30 契约定义评审通过,两处字段口径修订"
},
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-02/artifacts",
"text": "产物:\n- 需求清单 v3(doc)\n- 迁移脚本 runbook(doc)\n- 评审纪要 10-11(doc)"
}
],
"goal": "把它整理成交接页:新同事能看懂背景、当前状态和接手事项。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"tabs",
"section",
"markdown"
],
"goalKind": "handover"
}
},
{
"id": "to-04",
"family": "task-overview",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-03/steps",
"text": "任务「交付门禁自动化」步骤:\n- 需求冻结:done\n- 契约定义:done\n- 存储迁移:in_progress\n- 灰度开关:pending\n- 回退演练:pending"
},
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-03/log",
"text": "最近动态:\n- 10-08 09:12 存储迁移脚本在预发跑通,耗时 14m\n- 10-09 15:40 灰度开关等待安全评审排期\n- 10-10 11:05 回退演练草案提交,缺少数据校验步骤\n- 10-11 10:30 契约定义评审通过,两处字段口径修订"
},
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-03/artifacts",
"text": "产物:\n- 需求清单 v3(doc)\n- 迁移脚本 runbook(doc)\n- 评审纪要 10-11(doc)"
}
],
"goal": "我要快速看这个任务做到哪了、下一步是什么。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"steps",
"progress",
"kv"
],
"goalKind": "progress"
}
},
{
"id": "to-05",
"family": "task-overview",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-04/steps",
"text": "任务「交付门禁自动化」步骤:\n- 需求冻结:done\n- 契约定义:done\n- 存储迁移:in_progress\n- 灰度开关:pending\n- 回退演练:pending"
},
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-04/log",
"text": "最近动态:\n- 10-08 09:12 存储迁移脚本在预发跑通,耗时 14m\n- 10-09 15:40 灰度开关等待安全评审排期\n- 10-10 11:05 回退演练草案提交,缺少数据校验步骤\n- 10-11 10:30 契约定义评审通过,两处字段口径修订"
},
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-04/artifacts",
"text": "产物:\n- 需求清单 v3(doc)\n- 迁移脚本 runbook(doc)\n- 评审纪要 10-11(doc)"
}
],
"goal": "给我风险与欠账视图:哪里卡住了、缺什么、有什么过期项。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"timeline",
"list",
"kv"
],
"goalKind": "risk"
}
},
{
"id": "to-06",
"family": "task-overview",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-05/steps",
"text": "任务「交付门禁自动化」步骤:\n- 需求冻结:done\n- 契约定义:done\n- 存储迁移:in_progress\n- 灰度开关:pending\n- 回退演练:pending"
},
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-05/log",
"text": "最近动态:\n- 10-08 09:12 存储迁移脚本在预发跑通,耗时 14m\n- 10-09 15:40 灰度开关等待安全评审排期\n- 10-10 11:05 回退演练草案提交,缺少数据校验步骤\n- 10-11 10:30 契约定义评审通过,两处字段口径修订"
},
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-05/artifacts",
"text": "产物:\n- 需求清单 v3(doc)\n- 迁移脚本 runbook(doc)\n- 评审纪要 10-11(doc)"
}
],
"goal": "把它整理成交接页:新同事能看懂背景、当前状态和接手事项。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"tabs",
"section",
"markdown"
],
"goalKind": "handover"
}
},
{
"id": "to-07",
"family": "task-overview",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-06/steps",
"text": "任务「交付门禁自动化」步骤:\n- 需求冻结:done\n- 契约定义:done\n- 存储迁移:in_progress\n- 灰度开关:pending\n- 回退演练:pending"
},
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-06/log",
"text": "最近动态:\n- 10-08 09:12 存储迁移脚本在预发跑通,耗时 14m\n- 10-09 15:40 灰度开关等待安全评审排期\n- 10-10 11:05 回退演练草案提交,缺少数据校验步骤\n- 10-11 10:30 契约定义评审通过,两处字段口径修订"
},
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-06/artifacts",
"text": "产物:\n- 需求清单 v3(doc)\n- 迁移脚本 runbook(doc)\n- 评审纪要 10-11(doc)"
}
],
"goal": "我要快速看这个任务做到哪了、下一步是什么。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"steps",
"progress",
"kv"
],
"goalKind": "progress"
}
},
{
"id": "to-08",
"family": "task-overview",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-07/steps",
"text": "任务「交付门禁自动化」步骤:\n- 需求冻结:done\n- 契约定义:done\n- 存储迁移:in_progress\n- 灰度开关:pending\n- 回退演练:pending"
},
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-07/log",
"text": "最近动态:\n- 10-08 09:12 存储迁移脚本在预发跑通,耗时 14m\n- 10-09 15:40 灰度开关等待安全评审排期\n- 10-10 11:05 回退演练草案提交,缺少数据校验步骤\n- 10-11 10:30 契约定义评审通过,两处字段口径修订"
},
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-07/artifacts",
"text": "产物:\n- 需求清单 v3(doc)\n- 迁移脚本 runbook(doc)\n- 评审纪要 10-11(doc)"
}
],
"goal": "给我风险与欠账视图:哪里卡住了、缺什么、有什么过期项。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"timeline",
"list",
"kv"
],
"goalKind": "risk"
}
},
{
"id": "to-09",
"family": "task-overview",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-08/steps",
"text": "任务「交付门禁自动化」步骤:\n- 需求冻结:done\n- 契约定义:done\n- 存储迁移:in_progress\n- 灰度开关:pending\n- 回退演练:pending"
},
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-08/log",
"text": "最近动态:\n- 10-08 09:12 存储迁移脚本在预发跑通,耗时 14m\n- 10-09 15:40 灰度开关等待安全评审排期\n- 10-10 11:05 回退演练草案提交,缺少数据校验步骤\n- 10-11 10:30 契约定义评审通过,两处字段口径修订"
},
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-08/artifacts",
"text": "产物:\n- 需求清单 v3(doc)\n- 迁移脚本 runbook(doc)\n- 评审纪要 10-11(doc)"
}
],
"goal": "把它整理成交接页:新同事能看懂背景、当前状态和接手事项。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"tabs",
"section",
"markdown"
],
"goalKind": "handover"
}
},
{
"id": "to-10",
"family": "task-overview",
"materials": [
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-09/steps",
"text": "任务「交付门禁自动化」步骤:\n- 需求冻结:done\n- 契约定义:done\n- 存储迁移:in_progress\n- 灰度开关:pending\n- 回退演练:pending"
},
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-09/log",
"text": "最近动态:\n- 10-08 09:12 存储迁移脚本在预发跑通,耗时 14m\n- 10-09 15:40 灰度开关等待安全评审排期\n- 10-10 11:05 回退演练草案提交,缺少数据校验步骤\n- 10-11 10:30 契约定义评审通过,两处字段口径修订"
},
{
"sourceId": "task:eval/to-09/artifacts",
"text": "产物:\n- 需求清单 v3(doc)\n- 迁移脚本 runbook(doc)\n- 评审纪要 10-11(doc)"
}
],
"goal": "我要快速看这个任务做到哪了、下一步是什么。",
"expect": {
"nodeTypesAny": [
"steps",
"progress",
"kv"
],
"goalKind": "progress"
}
}
]
}
+157
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""U1 受控试验夹具生成器(原型,仅本任务内使用)。
30 个固定任务:research-compare(rc) / task-overview(to) / requirement-input(ri) 各 10。
材料全部合成,含稳定 sourceId;rc 内两组「同料不同目标」用于 R1 结构分化检验。
确定性:固定 seed,重复运行输出逐字节一致。
"""
import json
import random
R = random.Random(20261011)
TOOLS = [
("FlowSync", "流程编排", ["拖拽画布", "审批链", "REST 连接器"], "¥8/人/天", "SSO, 审计日志", "2023-05"),
("NexusGrid", "数据表格", ["虚拟滚动", "单元格校验", "导出 Excel"], "¥12/人/天", "私有化可选", "2021-11"),
("LarkPipe", "消息管道", ["Webhook 路由", "重试策略", "模板变量"], "¥5/人/天", "仅 SaaS", "2019-03"),
("VaultKeep", "权限中枢", ["RBAC", "临时令牌", "密钥轮换"], "¥15/人/天", "国密支持", "2022-08"),
("EchoDocs", "文档协同", ["批注", "版本链", "全文检索"], "¥9/人/天", "无离线", "2020-06"),
]
RISKS = [
("供应商锁定", "中", "私有 API 占比 40%"),
("性能未验证", "高", "万行表格场景无官方基准"),
("升级断层", "中", "近两季度仅小版本"),
("合规缺口", "高", "数据出境条款未覆盖"),
("培训成本", "低", "界面术语与现有系统不一致"),
]
def rc_materials(idx: int, variant: int):
"""3 份候选工具档案 + 1 份风险备忘。variant 区分同料组内不同档案组合。"""
picks = R.sample(TOOLS, 3) if variant == 0 else [TOOLS[(idx + k) % len(TOOLS)] for k in range(3)]
mats = []
for i, (name, cat, feats, price, deploy, since) in enumerate(picks):
lines = [
f"{name}:{cat}类工具,{since} 上线。",
f"核心能力:{'、'.join(feats)}。",
f"报价 {price};部署形态:{deploy}。",
f"近半年发布 {R.randint(2, 9)} 次,平均修复周期 {R.randint(1, 5)} 天。",
]
mats.append({"sourceId": f"doc:eval/rc-{idx:02d}/vendor{i+1}", "text": "\n".join(lines)})
rk = R.sample(RISKS, 3)
mats.append({
"sourceId": f"doc:eval/rc-{idx:02d}/riskmemo",
"text": "尽调风险备忘(内部):\n" + "\n".join(f"- {t}({g}):{d}" for t, g, d in rk),
})
return mats
RC_GOALS = [
("compare", "给决策会准备一页选型对比:突出三者的能力、价格与部署差异,给出你的建议与理由。", ["compare", "table"]),
("risk", "给风控评审准备风险分析页:把风险按严重度组织,标注每条风险的来源与你的判断。", ["timeline", "list", "kv"]),
("order", "规划评审后的实施顺序:分阶段列出步骤、依赖与里程碑。", ["steps", "timeline"]),
]
def build_rc():
tasks = []
# 两组同料不同目标(每组 3 任务共享材料),R1 结构分化检验
for g, base in enumerate([1, 7]):
mats = rc_materials(base, g)
for k, (kind, goal, expect) in enumerate(RC_GOALS):
tasks.append({
"id": f"rc-{base+k:02d}", "family": "research-compare",
"sharedGroup": f"facts-{chr(65+g)}", "materials": mats, "goal": goal,
"expect": {"nodeTypesAny": expect, "goalKind": kind},
})
# 4 个独立任务
for idx in [4, 5, 6, 10]:
kind, goal, expect = RC_GOALS[idx % 3]
tasks.append({
"id": f"rc-{idx:02d}", "family": "research-compare",
"materials": rc_materials(idx, idx % 2), "goal": goal,
"expect": {"nodeTypesAny": expect, "goalKind": kind},
})
return tasks
def to_materials(idx: int):
steps = [
("需求冻结", "done"), ("契约定义", "done"), ("存储迁移", "in_progress"),
("灰度开关", "pending"), ("回退演练", "pending"),
]
logs = [
("10-08 09:12", "存储迁移脚本在预发跑通,耗时 14m"),
("10-09 15:40", "灰度开关等待安全评审排期"),
("10-10 11:05", "回退演练草案提交,缺少数据校验步骤"),
("10-11 10:30", "契约定义评审通过,两处字段口径修订"),
]
arts = [("需求清单 v3", "doc"), ("迁移脚本 runbook", "doc"), ("评审纪要 10-11", "doc")]
return [
{"sourceId": f"task:eval/to-{idx:02d}/steps", "text": "任务「交付门禁自动化」步骤:\n" + "\n".join(f"- {s}:{st}" for s, st in steps)},
{"sourceId": f"task:eval/to-{idx:02d}/log", "text": "最近动态:\n" + "\n".join(f"- {t} {m}" for t, m in logs)},
{"sourceId": f"task:eval/to-{idx:02d}/artifacts", "text": "产物:\n" + "\n".join(f"- {n}({k})" for n, k in arts)},
]
TO_GOALS = [
("progress", "我要快速看这个任务做到哪了、下一步是什么。", ["steps", "progress", "kv"]),
("risk", "给我风险与欠账视图:哪里卡住了、缺什么、有什么过期项。", ["timeline", "list", "kv"]),
("handover", "把它整理成交接页:新同事能看懂背景、当前状态和接手事项。", ["tabs", "section", "markdown"]),
]
def build_to():
tasks = []
for idx in range(10):
kind, goal, expect = TO_GOALS[idx % 3]
tasks.append({
"id": f"to-{idx+1:02d}", "family": "task-overview",
"materials": to_materials(idx), "goal": goal,
"expect": {"nodeTypesAny": expect, "goalKind": kind},
})
return tasks
def ri_materials(idx: int):
ctx = [
("背景", "把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套,预算上限 40 万,期望 Q1 上线。"),
("干系人", "财务(审批人)、行政(发起人)、IT(运维);法务事后复核合同。"),
("已定", "保留移动端入口;审批链最多 5 级;历史数据只读归档。"),
]
opens = [
"归档年限未定:3 年还是 5 年?",
"是否需要纸质兜底流程?行政坚持,IT 反对。",
"并发审批上限:50 还是 200?",
"供应商是否要求驻场实施?",
"验收标准由谁签署:财务还是行政?",
"旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度?",
]
picked = R.sample(opens, 4)
return [
{"sourceId": f"req:eval/ri-{idx:02d}/context", "text": "\n".join(f"{k}:{v}" for k, v in ctx)},
{"sourceId": f"req:eval/ri-{idx:02d}/open", "text": "待决问题清单:\n" + "\n".join(f"- {p}" for p in picked)},
]
RI_GOALS = [
("collect", "把待决问题组织成可填写的表单页,标注必填与选项,方便我一次收集完。", ["form"]),
("confirm", "把已定约束与待决事项分开呈现,给我一页能逐项确认的范围页。", ["kv", "compare", "list"]),
]
def build_ri():
tasks = []
for idx in range(10):
kind, goal, expect = RI_GOALS[idx % 2]
tasks.append({
"id": f"ri-{idx+1:02d}", "family": "requirement-input",
"materials": ri_materials(idx), "goal": goal,
"expect": {"nodeTypesAny": expect, "goalKind": kind},
})
return tasks
def main():
tasks = sorted(build_rc() + build_to() + build_ri(), key=lambda t: t["id"])
assert len(tasks) == 30, len(tasks)
assert len({t["id"] for t in tasks}) == 30
with open(".task/genui-u1/fixtures.json", "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
json.dump({"seed": 20261011, "tasks": tasks}, f, ensure_ascii=False, indent=1)
fam = {}
for t in tasks:
fam[t["family"]] = fam.get(t["family"], 0) + 1
print("fixtures:", len(tasks), fam)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
+272
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,272 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""U1 试验共享库:MiniMax 调用、组件目录提示、规格校验器(原型)。"""
import json
import os
import re
import time
import urllib.request
BASE = os.environ.get("MINIMAX_BASE", "https://api.minimaxi.com/v1")
KEY = os.environ.get("MINIMAX_API_KEY", "")
NODE_TYPES = {
"section", "list", "kv", "form", "markdown", "doc-ref", "actions",
"chart-lite", "avatar", "progress", "compare", "tree", "table",
"steps", "tabs", "timeline",
}
NODE_FIELDS = { # 各类型允许的顶层字段(公共字段 id/source 之外)
"section": {"type", "title", "children"}, "list": {"type", "items"},
"kv": {"type", "kv"}, "form": {"type", "fields"},
"markdown": {"type", "markdown"}, "doc-ref": {"type", "docId"},
"actions": {"type", "actions"}, "chart-lite": {"type", "chart"},
"avatar": {"type", "avatar"}, "progress": {"type", "progress"},
"compare": {"type", "compare"}, "tree": {"type", "tree"},
"table": {"type", "table"}, "steps": {"type", "steps"},
"tabs": {"type", "tabs"}, "timeline": {"type", "timeline"},
}
TONES = {"ok", "warn", "danger", "info", ""}
MAX_NODES, MAX_DEPTH, MAX_BYTES = 200, 8, 256 * 1024
CATALOG_PROMPT = """你是本产品中的页面生成助手:宿主给出材料与目标,你输出一页声明式页面规格(JSON),由宿主通用渲染器渲染。
组件目录(仅允许以下 16 种节点类型;字段必须严格匹配,禁止出现目录外的类型或字段):
- section: {"title"?, "children"?:[节点]}
- list: {"items":["字符串"]}
- kv: {"kv":[["键","值"],...]}
- form: {"fields":[{"key","label","type":"text|textarea|number|boolean|select","options"?(select 必填),"required"?,"placeholder"?,"help"?,"default"?}]}
- markdown: {"markdown":"正文"}
- doc-ref: {"docId":"工件ID"}(docId 必须是材料中出现过的 sourceId)
- actions: {"actions":[{"id","label","style"?:"primary|default|danger"}]}(不带 command,点击降级为发送消息)
- chart-lite: {"chart":{"kind":"bar|line","labels":["…"],"series":[数值]}}(labels 与 series 等长)
- avatar: {"avatar":{"name","sub"?,"tone"?:"ok|warn|danger|info","stack"?}}
- progress: {"progress":{"label"?,"value":0~1 之间的数值}}
- compare: {"compare":{"left":{"title"?,"tone"?,"nodes"?:[节点]},"right":{同 left}}}
- tree: {"tree":{"nodes":[{"id","label","tone"?,"badge"?,"count"?,"children"?}]}}
- table: {"table":{"columns":[{"key","label"}],"rows":[{"id"?,"cells":[["列key","值"],...]}]}}(cells 与 columns 等长同序)
- steps: {"steps":{"current":0 起下标,"steps":[{"label","status"?:"pending|active|done|failed","tone"?}]}}
- tabs: {"tabs":{"tabs":[{"id","label","nodes"?:[节点]}],"active"?}}
- timeline: {"timeline":{"items":[{"title","time"?,"tone"?,"markdown"?,"ref"?}]}}
规则:
1. 每个节点可以带 "id"(整页唯一且稳定,如 n1、n2a)与 "source"(数组:支撑该节点事实内容的材料 sourceId,只能使用给定材料中的 id)。
2. 事实性内容必须来自材料并在相应节点标注 source;你的分析、建议、推断只能放 markdown 节点,且不加 source。
3. 硬限制:整页 ≤200 节点、嵌套 ≤8 层、规格 ≤256KiB;未知类型/字段、引用不存在的 sourceId 都会被宿主拒绝。
4. 结构服务目标:横向比较→compare/table;风险→按严重度组织并标来源;步骤/顺序→steps/timeline;收集输入→form;概览→section/tabs 组织。
5. 只输出一个 JSON 对象 {"title":"…","nodes":[…]},不要输出任何其他文字、解释或代码围栏。"""
BASELINE_PROMPT = """你是本产品中的助手。依据给定材料回答用户目标,输出为一张 Markdown 卡片(当前系统的卡片形态)。
只使用材料中的事实,不要编造;你的判断与建议需口头标明是分析。输出即卡片正文,不要额外说明。"""
def call_llm(model, system, user, max_tokens, temperature=0.3, retries=3):
body = json.dumps({
"model": model, "temperature": temperature, "max_tokens": max_tokens,
"messages": [{"role": "system", "content": system}, {"role": "user", "content": user}],
}).encode()
last = None
for i in range(retries):
req = urllib.request.Request(
BASE + "/chat/completions", data=body,
headers={"Authorization": "Bearer " + KEY, "Content-Type": "application/json"})
t0 = time.time()
try:
with urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=180) as r:
d = json.loads(r.read())
msg = (d.get("choices") or [{}])[0].get("message", {}) or {}
content = msg.get("content", "") or ""
raw_content = content
# MiniMax 会把 <think>…</think> 推理段内联进 content;剥离后才是可用的输出体。
content = re.sub(r"<think>.*?</think>\s*", "", content, flags=re.S).strip()
return {
"content": content, "raw_content": raw_content,
"usage": d.get("usage", {}),
"latency_s": round(time.time() - t0, 2),
}
except Exception as e: # 429/5xx/超时:退避重试
last = str(e)[:200]
time.sleep(3 * (i + 1))
raise RuntimeError(f"llm call failed: {last}")
def extract_json(text):
"""从回复中剥离围栏/杂文,解析唯一 JSON 对象。"""
t = text.strip()
m = re.search(r"```(?:json)?\s*(.+?)```", t, re.S)
if m:
t = m.group(1).strip()
if not t.startswith("{"):
s, e = t.find("{"), t.rfind("}")
if s >= 0 and e > s:
t = t[s:e + 1]
return json.loads(t)
def _err(errors, path, msg):
errors.append(f"{path}: {msg}")
def _check_str_list(v, path, errors, field):
if not isinstance(v, list) or any(not isinstance(x, str) for x in v):
_err(errors, path, f"{field} 必须为字符串数组")
def validate_spec(spec, source_ids):
"""严格校验:返回 (errors, stats)。stats 供评分(节点计数、深度、引用等)。"""
errors, stats = [], {"nodes": 0, "maxDepth": 0, "idsSeen": [], "refsUsed": set(), "unknownRefs": set(), "types": []}
def walk(node, path, depth):
stats["nodes"] += 1
stats["maxDepth"] = max(stats["maxDepth"], depth)
if not isinstance(node, dict):
_err(errors, path, "节点必须是对象"); return
t = node.get("type")
if t not in NODE_TYPES:
_err(errors, path, f"未知节点类型 {t!r}"); return
stats["types"].append(t)
extra = set(node) - NODE_FIELDS[t] - {"id", "source"}
if extra:
_err(errors, path, f"类型 {t} 不允许字段 {sorted(extra)}")
nid = node.get("id")
if nid is not None:
if not isinstance(nid, str) or not re.fullmatch(r"[A-Za-z0-9_-]{1,40}", nid):
_err(errors, path, f"非法 id {nid!r}")
elif nid in stats["idsSeen"]:
_err(errors, path, f"重复 id {nid!r}")
else:
stats["idsSeen"].append(nid)
src = node.get("source")
if src is not None:
if not isinstance(src, list) or any(not isinstance(x, str) for x in src):
_err(errors, path, "source 必须为字符串数组")
else:
for s in src:
(stats["refsUsed"] if s in source_ids else stats["unknownRefs"]).add(s)
if t == "list":
_check_str_list(node.get("items"), path, errors, "items")
elif t == "kv":
kv = node.get("kv")
if not isinstance(kv, list) or any(not (isinstance(p, list) and len(p) == 2 and all(isinstance(x, str) for x in p)) for p in kv):
_err(errors, path, "kv 必须为 [键,值] 对数组")
elif t == "markdown":
if not isinstance(node.get("markdown"), str):
_err(errors, path, "markdown 必须为字符串")
elif t == "doc-ref":
d = node.get("docId")
if not isinstance(d, str) or d not in source_ids:
_err(errors, path, f"docId 必须是材料 sourceId,得到 {d!r}")
else:
stats["refsUsed"].add(d)
elif t == "actions":
acts = node.get("actions")
if not isinstance(acts, list):
_err(errors, path, "actions 必须为数组")
else:
for a in acts:
if not isinstance(a, dict) or not (isinstance(a.get("id"), str) and isinstance(a.get("label"), str)) or a.get("style", "") not in {"primary", "default", "danger", ""}:
_err(errors, path, f"非法 action {a!r}")
elif "command" in a:
_err(errors, path, "试验目录不允许 command 字段")
elif t == "form":
fields = node.get("fields")
if not isinstance(fields, list) or not fields:
_err(errors, path, "form.fields 必须为非空数组")
else:
for f in fields:
ok = isinstance(f, dict) and isinstance(f.get("key"), str) and isinstance(f.get("label"), str) \
and f.get("type") in {"text", "textarea", "number", "boolean", "select"}
if not ok:
_err(errors, path, f"非法字段 {f!r}"); continue
if f["type"] == "select" and not isinstance(f.get("options"), list):
_err(errors, path, f"select 字段 {f['key']} 缺 options")
extraF = set(f) - {"key", "label", "type", "options", "required", "placeholder", "help", "default"}
if extraF:
_err(errors, path, f"字段 {f['key']} 不允许 {sorted(extraF)}")
elif t == "chart-lite":
c = node.get("chart")
if not isinstance(c, dict) or c.get("kind") not in {"bar", "line"} \
or not isinstance(c.get("labels"), list) or not isinstance(c.get("series"), list) \
or len(c["labels"]) != len(c["series"]) or any(not isinstance(x, (int, float)) for x in c["series"]):
_err(errors, path, "chart 需 kind∈{bar,line} 且 labels/series 等长数值")
elif t == "progress":
p = node.get("progress")
if not isinstance(p, dict) or not isinstance(p.get("value"), (int, float)) or not (0 <= p["value"] <= 1):
_err(errors, path, "progress.value 需 0~1")
elif t == "avatar":
a = node.get("avatar")
if not isinstance(a, dict) or not isinstance(a.get("name"), str) or a.get("tone", "") not in TONES:
_err(errors, path, "非法 avatar")
elif t == "tree":
ns = node.get("tree", {}).get("nodes")
if not isinstance(ns, list):
_err(errors, path, "tree.nodes 必须为数组")
else:
def wk(n):
if not isinstance(n, dict) or not (isinstance(n.get("id"), str) and isinstance(n.get("label"), str)) or n.get("tone", "") not in TONES:
_err(errors, path, f"非法树节点 {n!r}")
else:
for c in n.get("children") or []:
wk(c)
for n in ns:
wk(n)
elif t == "table":
tb = node.get("table")
cols = (tb or {}).get("columns") if isinstance(tb, dict) else None
rows = (tb or {}).get("rows") if isinstance(tb, dict) else None
if not isinstance(cols, list) or not cols or any(not (isinstance(c, dict) and isinstance(c.get("key"), str) and isinstance(c.get("label"), str)) for c in cols):
_err(errors, path, "table.columns 非法")
elif not isinstance(rows, list):
_err(errors, path, "table.rows 必须为数组")
else:
for r in rows:
cells = r.get("cells") if isinstance(r, dict) else None
if not isinstance(cells, list) or len(cells) != len(cols) or any(not (isinstance(c, list) and len(c) == 2 and all(isinstance(x, str) for x in c)) for c in cells):
_err(errors, path, "row.cells 必须与 columns 等长且为 [key,值] 对")
elif t == "steps":
st = node.get("steps")
steps = (st or {}).get("steps") if isinstance(st, dict) else None
if not isinstance(steps, list) or not steps or not isinstance(st.get("current"), int) or not (0 <= st["current"] < len(steps)) \
or any(not isinstance(s.get("label"), str) or s.get("status", "") not in {"pending", "active", "done", "failed", ""} for s in steps if isinstance(s, dict)):
_err(errors, path, "steps 需非空、current 在范围内、status 合法")
elif t == "tabs":
ts = node.get("tabs", {}).get("tabs") if isinstance(node.get("tabs"), dict) else None
if not isinstance(ts, list) or not ts or any(not (isinstance(x, dict) and isinstance(x.get("id"), str) and isinstance(x.get("label"), str)) for x in ts):
_err(errors, path, "tabs.tabs 非法")
else:
for x in ts:
for c in x.get("nodes") or []:
walk(c, path + f"/tab:{x['id']}", depth + 1)
elif t == "timeline":
items = (node.get("timeline") or {}).get("items")
if not isinstance(items, list) or not items or any(not (isinstance(i, dict) and isinstance(i.get("title"), str)) for i in items):
_err(errors, path, "timeline.items 非法")
elif t == "section":
for c in node.get("children") or []:
walk(c, path + "/child", depth + 1)
elif t == "compare":
cp = node.get("compare")
if not isinstance(cp, dict) or not isinstance(cp.get("left"), dict) or not isinstance(cp.get("right"), dict):
_err(errors, path, "compare 需 left/right")
else:
for side in ("left", "right"):
sd = cp[side]
if sd.get("tone", "") not in TONES:
_err(errors, path, f"compare.{side}.tone 非法")
for c in sd.get("nodes") or []:
walk(c, path + f"/{side}", depth + 1)
if not isinstance(spec, dict) or not isinstance(spec.get("title"), str) or not isinstance(spec.get("nodes"), list):
return ["顶层必须为 {title:string, nodes:[]}"], stats
if len(json.dumps(spec, ensure_ascii=False).encode()) > MAX_BYTES:
_err(errors, "$", "规格超过 256KiB")
for n in spec["nodes"]:
walk(n, "$", 1)
if stats["nodes"] > MAX_NODES:
_err(errors, "$", f"节点数 {stats['nodes']} 超过 200")
if stats["maxDepth"] > MAX_DEPTH:
_err(errors, "$", f"嵌套深度 {stats['maxDepth']} 超过 8")
if stats["unknownRefs"]:
_err(errors, "$", f"引用了不存在的 sourceId: {sorted(stats['unknownRefs'])}")
return errors, stats
def build_user_message(task):
mats = "\n\n".join(f"【{m['sourceId']}】\n{m['text']}" for m in task["materials"])
return f"材料(sourceId 如【】所示):\n\n{mats}\n\n用户目标:{task['goal']}"
+24
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""剥离 MiniMax 内联 <think> 段:B 臂 markdown 与 G 臂原始输出统一清洗(保留 raw_* 备审计)。"""
import glob, json, re
n = 0
for f in glob.glob('results/*/*.json'):
if f.endswith('summary.json'):
continue
r = json.load(open(f))
for mdkey in ('markdown',):
md = r.get(mdkey, '')
if '<think>' in md:
r['raw_' + mdkey] = md
r[mdkey] = re.sub(r'<think>.*?</think>\s*', '', md, flags=re.S).strip()
r['think_stripped'] = True
if mdkey == 'markdown':
r['ok'] = bool(r[mdkey])
n += 1
for rk in ('raw_first', 'raw_repair'):
rv = r.get(rk, '')
if '<think>' in rv:
r[rk + '_original'] = rv
r[rk] = re.sub(r'<think>.*?</think>\s*', '', rv, flags=re.S).strip()
json.dump(r, open(f, 'w'), ensure_ascii=False, indent=1)
print('cleaned', n, 'records')
+13
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
== spike.mjs (json-render: validate + render, flat props contract) ==
validateSpec ok: true issues: []
component arg keys: ["element","slots","emit","on","bindings","loading","children"]
render len: 101
render sample: <table><thead><th>维度</th><th>值</th></thead><tbody><tr><td>价格</td><td>¥8/人/天</td></tr></tbody></table>
catalog proto fns: constructor,__defineGetter__,__defineSetter__,hasOwnProperty,__lookupGetter__,__lookupSetter__,isPrototypeOf,propertyIsEnumerable,toString,valueOf
== spike2.mjs (nested children composition) ==
valid: true
nested render (table+steps): <div class="tbl"><table><tbody><tr><td>价格</td></tr></tbody></table><ol><li>冻结</li><li>灰度</li></ol></div>
== a2ui import probe (bare node) ==
ERR: ReferenceError: HTMLElement is not defined
+51
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
# U1 附录:json-render / A2UI renderer 选型挑战(G2)
日期:2026-10-11。隔离环境:`/tmp/genui-renderer-spike`(不入仓);React 19 + react-dom 19 + zod 4。
本节为原型 spike 记录,不是生产集成声明;未做视觉/可访问性验收,未接入 @ui 真实组件。
## 安装与体量
| 包 | 版本 | 许可 | peer | 体量(node_modules) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @json-render/core + /react | 0.21.0 | Apache-2.0 | react ^19.2.3、zod ^4 | ~1.8M(zod 另计 ~8.1M,dev 常见) |
| @a2ui/react | 0.13.0 | Apache-2.0 | react、react-dom、zod | ~20M(含 @a2ui/web_core、markdown-it) |
两者均可在 React 19 下干净安装,无版本冲突。
## json-render:端到端跑通(含嵌套组合)
- `defineCatalog`(zod props)+ `validateSpec` + `createRenderer` + `renderToString` 全链路可用;
用我们的 table/steps 形状定义目录,规格校验通过,嵌套组合(table 内挂 steps,经组件
`children`)渲染正确。
- **真实收益**:schema 驱动的规格校验(可替代手写校验器,目录即文档即校验);扁平 elements
+ children 键的规格格式与流式 patch 设计成熟。
- **集成成本**:
1. 组件契约是 `{element, slots, emit, on, bindings, loading, children}`——16 个 @ui 组件各需
一层包装 + 测试,不是「换个 switch」。
2. 规格为扁平格式,需与我们嵌套 UINode/Surface 信封之间加双向适配层(SurfaceVersion 联动)。
3. 框架自带 state store、action binding、visibility、patch 流——与我们 SSE/store/cmdbus/审批
职责重叠(r1 风险表「引入第二套状态/runtime」)。仅用其 render+validate 可避开,但那样
增量价值缩小为主要买「校验器 + 目录格式」。
4. `experimental_composeSpec`(决策模型组合)依赖 Vercel AI Gateway 且标注 experimental,本期不用。
## @a2ui/react:导入即要求 DOM,绑定模型与宿主解析相悖
- 包在**导入时就引用 `HTMLElement`**——裸 Node/SSR 环境直接抛错,需浏览器或 jsdom 垫片;
仅这一点就把它推向「前端专属重依赖」档(~20M)。
- 导出面为 `A2uiSurface` / `createComponentImplementation` / `useSignalValue` 等:数据经
**客户端 signal/binder** 持续绑定。这与 r1 KTD4「数据绑定由宿主服务端解析、模型不能自报
数据值」的信任边界结构性冲突——采用它要么放弃宿主解析(否决),要么只用其组件壳不用其
绑定(价值进一步缩小)。
- 本轮未做完整渲染 spike(受 DOM 前置约束),标注为 **部分完成**;结论按结构冲突已足够定型。
## 结论(建议,随 r2 评审确认)
- **首期不引入外部 renderer**:扩展现有 UIRenderer + 自研校验(本试验 G 臂即其原型)成本更低、
无第二运行时风险;json-render 的「目录即校验」思想值得在 U2 契约里借鉴(schema 驱动目录)。
- json-render 保留为 B 路线观察项:若后续 U5 交互闭环需要其 state/action/visibility 全家桶,
以「render+validate 子集」重评;A2UI 客户端绑定模型与宿主授权边界冲突,不推荐作为默认路线。
## 复核方式
/tmp/genui-renderer-spike/spike.mjs、spike2.mjs(含运行输出摘录见本目录 `renderer-spike.log`);
版本锁定:@json-render/core@0.21.0、@json-render/react@0.21.0、@a2ui/react@0.13.0、react@19。
+90
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
# U1 受控价值与选型试验报告(A/B)
日期:2026-10-11。任务:feature/generative-ui-u1。主记录:r1 提案 U1 节(用户 2026-10-11 裁定试验参数并指示开工)。
全部材料为合成样本;模型 MiniMax-M3 与 MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed(官方通道);结果 JSON 在 `results/`,本报告为唯一汇总。
## 一、结论摘要
1. **R1 结构分化成立**:同料不同目标的 6 组对照全部结构分化(类型多重集 Jaccard 0.17–0.50,
全部 <0.6 阈值),模型确实按目标重排信息结构,不是模板换标题。
2. **生成臂可用但文本通道有硬地板**:M3 首过合法 60%、一次修复后 83%(低于 r1 的 90%/98%
建议目标);终判失败 5 例**全部**为长中文 JSON 语法违纪(无一是目录形状类错误为主因)。
工具参数通道探针证明该类失败可消除(平台保证 JSON 序列化,仅剩可修复的语义错误)
——**直接印证 KTD2「页面规格作为工具参数产生」的必要性,r2 将其升为硬约束**。
3. **成本可忽略**:M3 生成 ¥0.067/任务(B 基线 ¥0.013),三臂加探针总开销 ≈¥3.0,
远低于 ¥200 上限。
4. **M2.7-highspeed 不适合当生成档**:文本通道合法率 20%(10 任务仅 2 份通过),
source 纪律也弱(覆盖 0.25);维持「生成=M3、轻量=highspeed」的既有路由结论。
5. **外部 renderer 本期不引入**:json-render 端到端可用但组件契约重({element,slots,emit,
bindings,children})+自带状态/动作/可见性全家桶与我方 store/SSE/cmdbus 职责重叠;
A2UI 导入即要求 DOM 且客户端 signal 绑定与 KTD4「宿主服务端解析」结构性冲突。
建议 U2 借鉴其「目录即 schema 即校验」,渲染继续扩展现有 UIRenderer。
6. **超生成倾向**:order/handover 目标下模型倾向塞入未被要求的 form/actions(rc-03 19 节点
含 form+actions),r2 目录需按目标类别收窄可用词汇并加「最小充分」提示。
## 二、主要指标
| 指标 | B(Markdown 基线) | G(M3 生成) | G-hs(highspeed 生成,子集) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 任务数 / 调用数 | 30 / 30 | 30 / 42(含 12 次修复) | 10 / 20 |
| 规格首过合法 | —(无规格) | 18/30(60%) | 0/10 |
| 一次修复后合法 | — | 25/30(83%) | 2/10(20%) |
| 结构契合(预期类型命中) | 0(无结构选择;compare 目标 3/3 用了 markdown 管道表) | 0.66(ri 0.88 / to 0.58 / rc 0.54) | 0.89(n=2,不具统计意义) |
| source 覆盖(引用材料源占比) | — | 0.87 | 0.25 |
| 稳定 nodeId 提供 | — | 25/25(合法规格全部提供) | 2/2 |
| prompt/completion tokens | 13.6k / 41.0k | 43.7k / 221.0k(中位 4.8k) | 18.2k / 24.5k |
| 费用(¥,保守无缓存折价) | 0.38(¥0.013/任务) | 2.00(¥0.067/任务) | 0.50 |
| 平均单任务耗时 | ~15s | ~59s | ~37s |
R1 分化明细(同料三目标 facts-A / facts-B,6 组两两对照):Jaccard 0.17 / 0.32 / 0.44(A 组)与
0.26 / 0.45 / 0.50(B 组),6/6 判 distinct。示例:同一份三工具档案,
compare 目标 → section×4+table+kv+markdown(8 节点);
risk 目标 → section×7+tree+kv×3+table+markdown×6(18 节点);
order 目标 → steps+timeline+tree+form+actions+doc-ref×4 等(19 节点)。
## 三、失败归因(G 臂 5 例终判失败)
- 无一例接近 14k token 上限(max 13366)——**不是截断**,是长中文串中的 JSON 语法违纪
(未转义字符等);修复轮 4 例仍语法错、1 例语义错(ri-02 修复轮出现 null 节点)。
- 探针 1(ri-10 + `response_format=json_object`):仍语法失败——**不解决**。
- 探针 2(ri-10 + 工具调用 `present_page`):解析干净通过,仅剩「children 内非对象」类
语义错误(修复环可处理)。生产通道定型:**工具参数**。
- 首过失败 12 例中除语法外,目录形状错误集中在 tabs(active 放错层级)与 form(多余包装层),
提示目录文档需给「完整最小示例」而非仅字段表(r2 修订)。
## 四、renderer 选型挑战(详见 renderer-spike.md)
- @json-render/core+react 0.21.0(Apache-2.0,React 19 peer):defineCatalog(zod)+validateSpec+
createRenderer+renderToString 端到端跑通(含嵌套 children 组合)。买它主要买「schema 驱动校验+
目录即提示」,但组件契约与状态/动作/可见性运行时与我们重复;仅用 render+validate 子集则增量
价值不足以抵消适配层(扁平 elements ↔ 嵌套 UINode 双向转换 + SurfaceVersion 联动 + 16 组件包装)。
- @a2ui/react 0.13.0:导入即引用 HTMLElement(无 DOM 环境抛错,~20M 依赖);客户端 signal/binder
数据绑定与「宿主服务端解析数据」信任边界冲突。本轮未做完整渲染 spike(部分完成)。
- 结论:**首期扩展自研 UIRenderer**;json-render 记为 U5 交互期重评项。
## 五、对 r1 的修订要点(r2)
1. 生成通道硬约束:页面规格只能经插件命令的工具参数提交(exposeAsTool),
不接受聊天文本 JSON;校验器语义错误回传、原 Agent 至多重提一次(维持)。
2. 目录文档必须携带每类型「完整最小示例」+ 按目标类别的推荐/禁用词汇表
(收窄 order/handover 下 form/actions 的随意使用)。
3. 校验器升级为 schema 驱动(借鉴 json-render 目录思路):目录=提示=校验三同源,
减少手写字段检查。
4. 生成模型默认 MiniMax-M3;M2.7-highspeed 不进入生成路径(本轮 20% 合法率)。
5. 规格有效率目标修订:工具通道下首过 ≥90%、修复后 ≥98% 维持为 U3 验收线;
本轮 60%/83% 记为文本通道下界,不作为能力否决依据。
6. U2 优先级确认:稳定 nodeId/页面信封/启禁闭环先行(本轮 nodeId 纪律良好,
25/25 合法规格全部提供稳定 id)。
## 六、局限与 NOT_RUN
- 人类可用性对照(任务成功率/耗时/满意度)未做——本轮全部为机器可判定指标;
「20% 效率改善才扩大自动模式」的判据仍需后续人工评审任务。
- 合成材料、n=30、每任务 1 次采样(rule-of-three:单项差异不足 3 例勿过度解读);
G-hs 有效样本 n=2,其质量类指标不具统计意义。
- 评分口径:结构契合按「预期类型出现比例」计,模型用 table 替代 compare 等合理替代
会被低估(rc 族 0.54 部分源于此)。
- 首轮 harness 缺陷(max_tokens=6000 被内联 <think> 挤占导致 JSON 截断)已修复为 14000
并重跑;首轮失败样本被重跑覆盖(错误信息留存于本报告第三节与运行日志),
由此产生的额外调用量未入 results 统计(费用影响 <¥0.5)。
- renderer spike 为 /tmp 隔离环境一次性运行,未入仓、未做视觉/可访问性验收。
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
+30
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
{
"task": "rc-06",
"family": "research-compare",
"arm": "B",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "compare",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 1622,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 517,
"completion_tokens": 1105,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"reasoning_tokens": 378
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 128
}
},
"latency_s": 19.94
}
],
"callCount": 1,
"markdown": "# 选型对比:LarkPipe / EchoDocs / NexusGrid\n\n> 用途:决策会一页对比材料|数据来源:三家厂商资料 + 内部尽调备忘\n\n## 一、横向对比表\n\n| 维度 | **LarkPipe** 消息管道 | **EchoDocs** 文档协同 | **NexusGrid** 数据表格 |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| 上线时间 | 2019-03 | 2020-06 | 2021-11 |\n| 核心能力 | Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量 | 批注、版本链、全文检索 | 虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel |\n| 报价(¥/人/天) | **5** | 9 | 12 |\n| 部署形态 | 仅 SaaS | 无离线(仅 SaaS) | **私有化可选** |\n| 近半年发布次数 | 6 | **9** | 5 |\n| 平均修复周期 | 3 天 | 2 天 | **1 天** |\n\n## 二、关键差异速读\n\n- **能力定位不重叠**:三者分属消息管道 / 文档协同 / 数据表格 三类工具,不构成\"同品类直接替代\"关系。\n- **价格阶梯明显**:以 NexusGrid 为基准(12),LarkPipe 为 **42%**,EchoDocs 为 75%。\n- **部署灵活度仅 NexusGrid**:另两家都强制 SaaS,无法私有化。\n- **迭代节奏**:EchoDocs 发布最勤(9 次),NexusGrid 修复最快(1 天)。\n\n## 三、尽调风险(来自内部备忘)\n\n| 风险项 | 等级 | 说明 |\n|---|---|---|\n| 供应商锁定 | 中 | 私有 API 占比 40% |\n| 性能未验证 | 高 | **万行表格场景无官方基准**(直接影响 NexusGrid 选用判断) |\n| 培训成本 | 低 | 界面术语与现有系统不一致 |\n\n## 四、建议\n\n> 以下为分析判断,非材料原文。\n\n**1. 不要\"三选一\",按场景分别引入。**\n三者能力象限互不重叠,\"选一个\"问题本身不成立。建议按业务诉求分别评估,而不是在决策会上强行排序。\n\n**2. 数据表格场景(NexusGrid)需先补性能证据,再决定。**\n理由:\n- 唯一支持私有化部署(合规与数据驻留友好);\n- 平均修复周期最短(1 天);\n- 但风险备忘明确标注\"万行表格无官方基准\",且私有 API 占比 40%——若实际业务存在万行以上表场景,应要求厂商出具基准报告或做 POC,否则不宜直接采购。\n\n**3. 消息管道(LarkPipe)适合先行试点。**\n理由:单价最低(¥5/人/天),SaaS 部署可快速验证 Webhook 路由与重试策略是否覆盖现有需求;先小范围跑通,再根据 40% 锁定风险决定是否后续封装适配层。\n\n**4. 文档协同(EchoDocs)建议暂缓评估。**\n理由:发布频率最高(9 次/半年)说明产品仍在快速迭代,叠加 SaaS-only 与界面术语不一致(培训成本低但存在),等待 1–2 个稳定版本后再评估更稳妥。\n\n**5. 共同动作:要求三家补充脱敏后的 API 文档。**\n私有 API 40% 占比是统一隐患,无论选哪家都应提前评估迁移与替代成本。",
"ok": true,
"wall_s": 19.9,
"raw_markdown": "<think>The user wants a one-page selection comparison for a decision meeting, highlighting the capabilities, pricing, and deployment differences of three tools, and providing my recommendation and reasoning.\n\nTools:\n1. LarkPipe - Message pipeline tool, 2019-03 launched\n - Capabilities: Webhook routing, retry strategy, template variables\n - Price: ¥5/person/day\n - Deployment: SaaS only\n - Releases last 6 months: 6 times, avg fix cycle: 3 days\n\n2. EchoDocs - Document collaboration tool, 2020-06 launched\n - Capabilities: Annotation, version chain, full-text search\n - Price: ¥9/person/day\n - Deployment: No offline (SaaS only)\n - Releases last 6 months: 9 times, avg fix cycle: 2 days\n\n3. NexusGrid - Data table tool, 2021-11 launched\n - Capabilities: Virtual scrolling, cell validation, export to Excel\n - Price: ¥12/person/day\n - Deployment: Private deployment optional\n - Releases last 6 months: 5 times, avg fix cycle: 1 day\n\nRisk memo:\n- Vendor lock-in (medium): Private API ratio 40%\n- Performance unverified (high): No official benchmark for 10k-row tables\n- Training cost (low): UI terminology inconsistent with existing systems\n\nLet me create a Markdown card with comparison table and recommendations.\n\nI need to:\n1. Highlight capabilities, pricing, deployment differences\n2. Give my recommendation with reasoning (marked as analysis)\n3. Use only facts from materials, no fabrication\n\nLet me structure this as a one-page card:\n- Title\n- Comparison table (capabilities, pricing, deployment, iteration speed)\n- Risk notes\n- Recommendation with analysis\n\nFormat: Markdown card, no extra commentary.</think>\n\n# 选型对比:LarkPipe / EchoDocs / NexusGrid\n\n> 用途:决策会一页对比材料|数据来源:三家厂商资料 + 内部尽调备忘\n\n## 一、横向对比表\n\n| 维度 | **LarkPipe** 消息管道 | **EchoDocs** 文档协同 | **NexusGrid** 数据表格 |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| 上线时间 | 2019-03 | 2020-06 | 2021-11 |\n| 核心能力 | Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量 | 批注、版本链、全文检索 | 虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel |\n| 报价(¥/人/天) | **5** | 9 | 12 |\n| 部署形态 | 仅 SaaS | 无离线(仅 SaaS) | **私有化可选** |\n| 近半年发布次数 | 6 | **9** | 5 |\n| 平均修复周期 | 3 天 | 2 天 | **1 天** |\n\n## 二、关键差异速读\n\n- **能力定位不重叠**:三者分属消息管道 / 文档协同 / 数据表格 三类工具,不构成\"同品类直接替代\"关系。\n- **价格阶梯明显**:以 NexusGrid 为基准(12),LarkPipe 为 **42%**,EchoDocs 为 75%。\n- **部署灵活度仅 NexusGrid**:另两家都强制 SaaS,无法私有化。\n- **迭代节奏**:EchoDocs 发布最勤(9 次),NexusGrid 修复最快(1 天)。\n\n## 三、尽调风险(来自内部备忘)\n\n| 风险项 | 等级 | 说明 |\n|---|---|---|\n| 供应商锁定 | 中 | 私有 API 占比 40% |\n| 性能未验证 | 高 | **万行表格场景无官方基准**(直接影响 NexusGrid 选用判断) |\n| 培训成本 | 低 | 界面术语与现有系统不一致 |\n\n## 四、建议\n\n> 以下为分析判断,非材料原文。\n\n**1. 不要\"三选一\",按场景分别引入。**\n三者能力象限互不重叠,\"选一个\"问题本身不成立。建议按业务诉求分别评估,而不是在决策会上强行排序。\n\n**2. 数据表格场景(NexusGrid)需先补性能证据,再决定。**\n理由:\n- 唯一支持私有化部署(合规与数据驻留友好);\n- 平均修复周期最短(1 天);\n- 但风险备忘明确标注\"万行表格无官方基准\",且私有 API 占比 40%——若实际业务存在万行以上表场景,应要求厂商出具基准报告或做 POC,否则不宜直接采购。\n\n**3. 消息管道(LarkPipe)适合先行试点。**\n理由:单价最低(¥5/人/天),SaaS 部署可快速验证 Webhook 路由与重试策略是否覆盖现有需求;先小范围跑通,再根据 40% 锁定风险决定是否后续封装适配层。\n\n**4. 文档协同(EchoDocs)建议暂缓评估。**\n理由:发布频率最高(9 次/半年)说明产品仍在快速迭代,叠加 SaaS-only 与界面术语不一致(培训成本低但存在),等待 1–2 个稳定版本后再评估更稳妥。\n\n**5. 共同动作:要求三家补充脱敏后的 API 文档。**\n私有 API 40% 占比是统一隐患,无论选哪家都应提前评估迁移与替代成本。",
"think_stripped": true
}
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
+30
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
{
"task": "rc-10",
"family": "research-compare",
"arm": "B",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "risk",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 1513,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 517,
"completion_tokens": 996,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"reasoning_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 0
}
},
"latency_s": 12.75
}
],
"callCount": 1,
"markdown": "# 风控评审 · 风险分析页\n\n## 🔴 高风险\n\n### 性能未验证\n- **来源**:`doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo`\n- **事实**:万行表格场景无官方基准。\n- **关联产品**:NexusGrid(vendor2),核心能力包含虚拟滚动,但材料未披露其在大数据量下的实测数据。【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor2】\n- **分析**:作为数据表格类工具,万行场景是高频使用边界,缺乏官方基准意味着性能承诺尚未被独立验证,建议要求厂商补充压测报告或纳入试点验证后再评估。\n\n---\n\n## 🟡 中风险\n\n### 升级断层\n- **来源**:`doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo`\n- **事实**:近两季度仅小版本。\n- **关联产品**:三家产品近半年发布次数分别为 4、6、6 次【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor1】【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor2】【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor3】,从发布频次看不出明显断层,需进一步索取版本号级差异明细。\n- **分析**:仅\"小版本\"可能意味着重大架构或安全更新停滞;若属于权限类工具(VaultKeep)则风险放大,建议核实各产品近两季度 changelog 中是否含架构级或安全级变更。\n\n---\n\n## 🟢 低风险\n\n### 培训成本\n- **来源**:`doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo`\n- **事实**:界面术语与现有系统不一致。\n- **分析**:属于使用摩擦类风险,影响范围有限,可通过内部术语对照表或培训手册覆盖,不构成准入阻塞。\n\n---\n\n## 附:分析补充观察(未在备忘中,由材料事实推导)\n\n> 以下为基于材料事实的判断,非尽调备忘原文,仅供参考。\n\n| 观察点 | 事实依据 | 判断 |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| 修复周期差异 | VaultKeep 平均修复周期 5 天,EchoDocs/NexusGrid 均为 3 天【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor1】【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor2】【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor3】 | **分析**:权限类工具对响应时效更敏感,5 天修复周期属可接受范围但偏长,建议在 SLA 中明确高危漏洞修复时限。 |\n| 部署形态差异 | EchoDocs 无离线;NexusGrid 私有化可选;VaultKeep 国密支持【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor1】【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor2】【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor3】 | **分析**:若客户环境为内网或涉密场景,EchoDocs 无离线部署将直接不可用,VaultKeep 国密支持是加分项。 |\n| 报价区间 | ¥9–¥15/人/天,价差约 67% | **分析**:需结合实际采购人数与是否含私有化/国密溢价综合评估单价合理性,材料未给出折扣梯度,无法定论。 |",
"ok": true,
"wall_s": 12.8,
"raw_markdown": "<think>The user wants a risk analysis page for a risk control review. I need to organize risks by severity, label each risk's source, and clearly mark my own analysis/judgment.\n\nLet me extract the risks from the risk memo:\n1. 升级断层(中):近两季度仅小版本 - Source: doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo\n2. 性能未验证(高):万行表格场景无官方基准 - Source: doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo\n3. 培训成本(低):界面术语与现有系统不一致 - Source: doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo\n\nI should also consider whether there are other risks I can derive from the vendor data based on the materials. Let me check:\n\n- Vendor3 (VaultKeep) 平均修复周期5天,比其他两家(3天)长,这可能与安全类工具相关,是分析判断。\n- Vendor2 (NexusGrid) 报价¥12/人/天,是数据表格类工具,与万行表格性能问题直接相关。\n- Vendor1 (EchoDocs) 没有明显新风险点。\n\nThe user asked specifically to organize risks by severity, label source and judgment. I should keep this focused on the risks in the memo, since those are the official risk items. But I can add analytical observations based on material facts.\n\nLet me structure this as a Markdown card:\n\nThe format should be a Markdown card. I'll use headers/structure appropriate for a risk review page.\n\nI need to:\n1. Use only facts from materials - don't fabricate\n2. Mark my judgments as analysis (口头标明是分析)\n3. Output is the card body itself, no extra explanation\n\nLet me organize by severity (高 > 中 > 低):</think>\n\n# 风控评审 · 风险分析页\n\n## 🔴 高风险\n\n### 性能未验证\n- **来源**:`doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo`\n- **事实**:万行表格场景无官方基准。\n- **关联产品**:NexusGrid(vendor2),核心能力包含虚拟滚动,但材料未披露其在大数据量下的实测数据。【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor2】\n- **分析**:作为数据表格类工具,万行场景是高频使用边界,缺乏官方基准意味着性能承诺尚未被独立验证,建议要求厂商补充压测报告或纳入试点验证后再评估。\n\n---\n\n## 🟡 中风险\n\n### 升级断层\n- **来源**:`doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo`\n- **事实**:近两季度仅小版本。\n- **关联产品**:三家产品近半年发布次数分别为 4、6、6 次【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor1】【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor2】【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor3】,从发布频次看不出明显断层,需进一步索取版本号级差异明细。\n- **分析**:仅\"小版本\"可能意味着重大架构或安全更新停滞;若属于权限类工具(VaultKeep)则风险放大,建议核实各产品近两季度 changelog 中是否含架构级或安全级变更。\n\n---\n\n## 🟢 低风险\n\n### 培训成本\n- **来源**:`doc:eval/rc-10/riskmemo`\n- **事实**:界面术语与现有系统不一致。\n- **分析**:属于使用摩擦类风险,影响范围有限,可通过内部术语对照表或培训手册覆盖,不构成准入阻塞。\n\n---\n\n## 附:分析补充观察(未在备忘中,由材料事实推导)\n\n> 以下为基于材料事实的判断,非尽调备忘原文,仅供参考。\n\n| 观察点 | 事实依据 | 判断 |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| 修复周期差异 | VaultKeep 平均修复周期 5 天,EchoDocs/NexusGrid 均为 3 天【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor1】【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor2】【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor3】 | **分析**:权限类工具对响应时效更敏感,5 天修复周期属可接受范围但偏长,建议在 SLA 中明确高危漏洞修复时限。 |\n| 部署形态差异 | EchoDocs 无离线;NexusGrid 私有化可选;VaultKeep 国密支持【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor1】【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor2】【doc:eval/rc-10/vendor3】 | **分析**:若客户环境为内网或涉密场景,EchoDocs 无离线部署将直接不可用,VaultKeep 国密支持是加分项。 |\n| 报价区间 | ¥9–¥15/人/天,价差约 67% | **分析**:需结合实际采购人数与是否含私有化/国密溢价综合评估单价合理性,材料未给出折扣梯度,无法定论。 |",
"think_stripped": true
}
+28
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
{
"task": "ri-01",
"family": "requirement-input",
"arm": "B",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "collect",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 2792,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 397,
"completion_tokens": 2395,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"reasoning_tokens": 2061
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 128
}
},
"latency_s": 30.65
}
],
"callCount": 1,
"markdown": "# 待决问题收集表单\n\n> 数据来源:【req:eval/ri-00/open】待决问题清单(4 项) \n> 用途:把上述问题组织为可填写的表单页,一次性收集完成。\n\n---\n\n**填写说明**:题号后带 `*` 为必填;选项均来自原清单;\"待定\"为分析补充,便于原选项无法直接决策时使用。\n\n---\n\n### Q1 * 供应商是否要求驻场实施?\n- ☐ 是 \n- ☐ 否 \n- ☐ 待定(分析补充)\n\n### Q2 * 并发审批上限\n- ☐ 50 \n- ☐ 200 \n- ☐ 待定(分析补充)\n\n### Q3 * 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度?\n- ☐ 允许 \n- ☐ 不允许 \n- ☐ 待定(分析补充)\n\n### Q4 * 验收标准由谁签署?\n- ☐ 财务 \n- ☐ 行政 \n- ☐ 待定(分析补充)\n\n---\n\n**填写信息**\n- 填写人:________________ \n- 填写日期:____ / ____ / ____ \n- 关联背景(来自【req:eval/ri-00/context】):预算上限 40 万 / 期望 Q1 上线 / 审批链最多 5 级 / 历史数据只读归档 / 保留移动端入口\n\n---\n\n> *备注(分析):4 项全部标记为必填,依据是用户目标\"一次收集完\"——任一项缺失都需再次回访,建议每一题都给出明确答复后再汇总。*",
"ok": true,
"wall_s": 30.6
}
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
+30
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
{
"task": "ri-03",
"family": "requirement-input",
"arm": "B",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "collect",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 1577,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 399,
"completion_tokens": 1178,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"reasoning_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 128
}
},
"latency_s": 13.96
}
],
"callCount": 1,
"markdown": "# 待决问题收集表单\n\n> 来源:【req:eval/ri-02/open】,共 4 项未决。\n> 上下文:预算 ≤ 40 万 · Q1 上线 · 干系人:财务(审批)/ 行政(发起)/ IT(运维)/ 法务(事后复核)\n> 已定项(无需再填):移动端入口保留 · 审批链 ≤ 5 级 · 历史数据只读归档\n\n---\n\n### ① 验收标准签署方 *必填*\n- ☐ 财务\n- ☐ 行政\n\n---\n\n### ② 并发审批上限 *必填*\n- ☐ 50\n- ☐ 200\n\n---\n\n### ③ 供应商是否要求驻场实施 *必填*\n- ☐ 是\n- ☐ 否\n\n---\n\n### ④ 归档年限 *必填*\n- ☐ 3 年\n- ☐ 5 年\n\n---\n\n### 填写说明\n- 4 项均为推进 Q1 上线前需要锁定的决策点。\n- 材料中未给出选型依据(如并发基线、凭证保存年限),建议(分析)在备注栏补充理由,方便事后复核。\n- 若某项暂不能决定,可留空并在备注中标注阻塞原因,便于后续追问。\n\n> 分析提示(仅供参考,非材料事实):驻场与签署方两项直接影响合同条款与采购排期,建议优先于\"并发上限\"和\"归档年限\"确定。",
"ok": true,
"wall_s": 14.0,
"raw_markdown": "<think>The user wants me to organize the open issues from the material into a fillable form page, marking required fields and options, so they can collect all information at once.\n\nLet me analyze the material:\n\nFrom 【req:eval/ri-02/context】:\n- Background: merging two parallel internal approval systems into one, budget cap 40万, expected Q1 launch\n- Stakeholders: 财务 (Finance, approver), 行政 (Admin, initiator), IT (Operations); Legal reviews contracts after the fact\n- Decided: mobile entry retained; approval chain max 5 levels; historical data read-only archive\n\nFrom 【req:eval/ri-02/open】:\nOpen issues:\n1. 验收标准由谁签署:财务还是行政?\n2. 并发审批上限:50 还是 200?\n3. 供应商是否要求驻场实施?\n4. 归档年限未定:3 年还是 5 年?\n\nThe user wants this organized as a fillable form with required/optional markings and options.\n\nLet me design a clean Markdown form card. I should:\n- Mark required fields\n- Provide options as specified in the material\n- Not add facts not in the material\n- Mark my suggestions as analysis\n\nSince the user wants to collect this info \"一次收集完\" (at once), I should present all 4 open questions as form fields.\n\nLet me structure it as a Markdown form. Each field should have:\n- Question/label\n- Required (必填) marker\n- Options provided in the material\n\nI'll add some analysis notes where appropriate (like which stakeholder typically signs acceptance, or considerations for concurrent limits), but clearly mark them as analysis.\n\nLet me draft:\n\n# 待决问题收集表单\n\n> 用途:一次收集【req:eval/ri-02】所有待决项,以便推进 Q1 上线。\n> 已定项(不需填写):移动端入口保留 / 审批链 ≤ 5 级 / 历史数据只读归档\n> 上下文:预算 ≤ 40 万;干系人 = 财务(审批)/ 行政(发起)/ IT(运维)/ 法务(事后复核)\n\n## 字段 1:验收标准签署方 *必填*\n- 选项:\n - 财务\n - 行政\n- 备注:材料中两个选项并列,未提供更细标准;建议(分析)由发起方行政牵头会签财务,避免后续返工。\n\n## 字段 2:并发审批上限 *必填*\n- 选项:\n - 50\n - 200\n- 备注:建议(分析)依据审批链 ≤ 5 级与日均单量评估,材料未给历史并发基线。\n\n## 字段 3:供应商驻场实施 *必填*\n- 选项:\n - 是(要求驻场)\n - 否(不要求驻场)\n- 备注:影响预算与排期,需在采购前确定。\n\n## 字段 4:归档年限 *必填*\n- 选项:\n - 3 年\n - 5 年\n- 备注:建议(分析)结合法务/财务凭证保存要求选择,材料未提供依据。\n\n---\n\n分析补充:\n- 全部 4 项均会影响合同条款、预算分配与上线节点,建议在同一批次确定后再启动采购与开发。\n- 建议优先级(分析):1-签署方 → 3-驻场 → 2-并发上限 → 4-归档年限,因前两项直接影响合同与上线。\n\nActually, let me reconsider. The user said \"标注必填与选项\" - mark required vs optional and options. All 4 are pending decisions, so logically all should be required if the goal is to collect them \"一次收集完\" (all at once).\n\nBut wait - maybe some are more critical than others. The user didn't specify, so I should mark them all as 必填 since the goal is to collect all open issues. Or I could make a judgment call (marked as analysis).\n\nLet me keep it simple: all 4 are open issues that need to be decided, so all are 必填 for this collection pass.\n\nLet me finalize the card format. It should be a clean Markdown form, not too verbose.</think>\n\n# 待决问题收集表单\n\n> 来源:【req:eval/ri-02/open】,共 4 项未决。\n> 上下文:预算 ≤ 40 万 · Q1 上线 · 干系人:财务(审批)/ 行政(发起)/ IT(运维)/ 法务(事后复核)\n> 已定项(无需再填):移动端入口保留 · 审批链 ≤ 5 级 · 历史数据只读归档\n\n---\n\n### ① 验收标准签署方 *必填*\n- ☐ 财务\n- ☐ 行政\n\n---\n\n### ② 并发审批上限 *必填*\n- ☐ 50\n- ☐ 200\n\n---\n\n### ③ 供应商是否要求驻场实施 *必填*\n- ☐ 是\n- ☐ 否\n\n---\n\n### ④ 归档年限 *必填*\n- ☐ 3 年\n- ☐ 5 年\n\n---\n\n### 填写说明\n- 4 项均为推进 Q1 上线前需要锁定的决策点。\n- 材料中未给出选型依据(如并发基线、凭证保存年限),建议(分析)在备注栏补充理由,方便事后复核。\n- 若某项暂不能决定,可留空并在备注中标注阻塞原因,便于后续追问。\n\n> 分析提示(仅供参考,非材料事实):驻场与签署方两项直接影响合同条款与采购排期,建议优先于\"并发上限\"和\"归档年限\"确定。",
"think_stripped": true
}
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
+30
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
{
"task": "ri-05",
"family": "requirement-input",
"arm": "B",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "collect",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 1578,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 397,
"completion_tokens": 1181,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"reasoning_tokens": 679
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 128
}
},
"latency_s": 12.1
}
],
"callCount": 1,
"markdown": "# 待决问题收集表单\n\n> 项目:内部审批系统合并(双系统→单系统)|预算上限 40 万|目标 Q1 上线\n> 收集日期:__________ 填表人:__________ 【必填】\n\n---\n\n## Q1 · 验收标准签署方\n\n> 依据:财务为审批人、行政为发起人,签署方待定。\n\n- ◯ **财务**\n- ◯ **行政**\n- ◯ 财务 + 行政 联合签署(【分析】建议,便于权责闭环)\n- ◯ 其他:________\n\n【必填】 · 建议附签署模板链接:__________\n\n---\n\n## Q2 · 旧系统下线窗口\n\n> 依据:上线目标 Q1,下线是否允许跨季度未决。\n\n- ◯ **允许跨季度**(建议阶段内只读,并行一段时间)\n- ◯ **必须 Q1 内完成**(上线即切换,强制 deadline)\n- ◯ 其他安排:________\n\n【必填】 · 若跨季度,请注明并行窗口长度:________\n\n---\n\n## Q3 · 并发审批上限\n\n> 依据:候选值 50 或 200,待选定。\n\n| 选项 | 适用场景判断【分析】 |\n|---|---|\n| ◯ **50** | 单部门并行场景,建议保守值 |\n| ◯ **200** | 多部门集中提报场景,建议保险值 |\n| ◯ 其他数值:________ | __ |\n\n【必填】 · 选定值:________\n\n---\n\n## Q4 · 供应商实施方式\n\n> 依据:是否要求驻场未决。\n\n- ◯ **驻场实施**(含驻场人数与周期:________)\n- ◯ **远程实施**\n- ◯ 混合(驻场 + 远程,比例与节点:________)\n\n【必填】\n\n---\n\n## Q5 · 补充约束(【选填】)\n\n用于补充未在待决清单内、但会影响推进的问题,例如合同条款、数据迁移节奏、UAT 责任方等:\n\n- 补充项 1:________\n- 补充项 2:________\n\n---\n\n**收集说明**:\n- 标注【分析】的内容为基于背景材料的判断建议,非材料原文事实,请填表人确认后再定。\n- 表单回填后,建议由 IT 汇总并知会财务、行政、法务四方确认,再进入实施合同谈判环节。",
"ok": true,
"wall_s": 12.1,
"raw_markdown": "<think>The user wants me to organize the open issues into a fillable form page, marking required fields and options, so they can collect all answers at once. Let me look at the materials carefully.\n\nFrom the context (req:eval/ri-04/context):\n- Background: Merging two parallel internal approval systems into one, budget cap 40万, expected Q1 launch\n- Stakeholders: Finance (approver), Administration (initiator), IT (operations); Legal post-review of contracts\n- Decided: Keep mobile entry; approval chain max 5 levels; historical data read-only archived\n\nFrom open issues (req:eval/ri-04/open):\n- Who signs acceptance criteria: Finance or Administration?\n- Is old system shutdown window allowed to cross quarters?\n- Concurrent approval upper limit: 50 or 200?\n- Does vendor require on-site implementation?\n\nThe user wants this organized as a fillable form page with required fields marked and options provided.\n\nLet me design a clean form structure. I should:\n1. Mark each item's required status\n2. Provide options where the material gives choices\n3. Add fields like \"填表人\", \"填表日期\" for the form to be complete\n4. Use analysis notes where I'm making recommendations\n\nLet me think about required fields - the user said \"标注必填\", so I need to mark which fields are required. Given this is a decision collection form, likely all the core decisions are required, while metadata fields like \"填表人\" could be required too.\n\nLet me draft the form:\n\n# 待决问题收集表单\n\n## 表头信息\n- 填表人 [必填]\n- 填表日期 [必填]\n- 表单版本 [选填]\n\n## 一、验收标准签署方\n**说明**:背景资料中提到财务为审批人,行政为发起人,但验收签署方未明确。\n- 选项:\n - ○ 财务\n - ○ 行政\n - ○ 财务+行政联合签署\n - ○ 其他:_____\n- 必填:是\n\n## 二、旧系统下线窗口\n**说明**:Q1 上线,旧系统下线窗口是否可跨季度未决。\n- 选项:\n - ○ 允许跨季度\n - ○ 必须 Q1 内完成\n - ○ 其他安排:_____\n- 必填:是\n\n## 三、并发审批上限\n**说明**:材料给出两个候选值。\n- 选项:\n - ○ 50\n - ○ 200\n - ○ 其他数值:_____\n- 必填:是\n\n## 四、供应商实施方式\n**说明**:是否要求驻场实施。\n- 选项:\n - ○ 驻场实施\n - ○ 远程实施\n - ○ 混合(驻场+远程):_____\n- 必填:是\n\n## 五、补充意见(选填)\n\nI should also note where I'm making analysis/judgment calls. Let me check:\n- The options like \"财务+行政联合签署\", \"其他安排\", \"其他数值\" are my additions - I should mark these as analytical recommendations\n- The \"必填\" marking is my judgment - I should note this as analysis\n\nLet me make the output clean and useful. The system says output is a Markdown card directly, no extra explanation.</think>\n\n# 待决问题收集表单\n\n> 项目:内部审批系统合并(双系统→单系统)|预算上限 40 万|目标 Q1 上线\n> 收集日期:__________ 填表人:__________ 【必填】\n\n---\n\n## Q1 · 验收标准签署方\n\n> 依据:财务为审批人、行政为发起人,签署方待定。\n\n- ◯ **财务**\n- ◯ **行政**\n- ◯ 财务 + 行政 联合签署(【分析】建议,便于权责闭环)\n- ◯ 其他:________\n\n【必填】 · 建议附签署模板链接:__________\n\n---\n\n## Q2 · 旧系统下线窗口\n\n> 依据:上线目标 Q1,下线是否允许跨季度未决。\n\n- ◯ **允许跨季度**(建议阶段内只读,并行一段时间)\n- ◯ **必须 Q1 内完成**(上线即切换,强制 deadline)\n- ◯ 其他安排:________\n\n【必填】 · 若跨季度,请注明并行窗口长度:________\n\n---\n\n## Q3 · 并发审批上限\n\n> 依据:候选值 50 或 200,待选定。\n\n| 选项 | 适用场景判断【分析】 |\n|---|---|\n| ◯ **50** | 单部门并行场景,建议保守值 |\n| ◯ **200** | 多部门集中提报场景,建议保险值 |\n| ◯ 其他数值:________ | __ |\n\n【必填】 · 选定值:________\n\n---\n\n## Q4 · 供应商实施方式\n\n> 依据:是否要求驻场未决。\n\n- ◯ **驻场实施**(含驻场人数与周期:________)\n- ◯ **远程实施**\n- ◯ 混合(驻场 + 远程,比例与节点:________)\n\n【必填】\n\n---\n\n## Q5 · 补充约束(【选填】)\n\n用于补充未在待决清单内、但会影响推进的问题,例如合同条款、数据迁移节奏、UAT 责任方等:\n\n- 补充项 1:________\n- 补充项 2:________\n\n---\n\n**收集说明**:\n- 标注【分析】的内容为基于背景材料的判断建议,非材料原文事实,请填表人确认后再定。\n- 表单回填后,建议由 IT 汇总并知会财务、行政、法务四方确认,再进入实施合同谈判环节。",
"think_stripped": true
}
+30
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
{
"task": "ri-06",
"family": "requirement-input",
"arm": "B",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "confirm",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 1471,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 399,
"completion_tokens": 1072,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"reasoning_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 128
}
},
"latency_s": 11.48
}
],
"callCount": 1,
"markdown": "# 合并审批系统 · 范围确认页\n\n## 一、已定约束(基线 · 不可变更)\n- [ ] **系统范围**:两套并行审批系统 → 合并为一套\n- [ ] **预算上限**:40 万\n- [ ] **上线时间**:Q1\n- [ ] **干系人分工**:财务 = 审批人;行政 = 发起人;IT = 运维;法务 = 事后复核合同\n- [ ] **移动端入口**:保留\n- [ ] **审批链层级**:最多 5 级\n- [ ] **历史数据处理**:只读归档\n\n## 二、待决事项(需逐项拍板)\n- [ ] **纸质兜底流程是否保留** —— 行政坚持、IT 反对(立场冲突,待拍板方裁决)\n- [ ] **验收标准签署方** —— 财务 或 行政\n- [ ] **供应商实施方式** —— 是否要求驻场\n- [ ] **归档年限** —— 3 年 或 5 年\n\n---\n\n**分析提示**:四项待决中,「纸质兜底」一项存在明确立场对立,建议优先处理——是否保留纸质通道会直接影响系统冗余设计与运维责任划分;其余三项可顺次确认并分别落入合同条款、验收文档与归档策略。",
"ok": true,
"wall_s": 11.5,
"raw_markdown": "<think>The user wants a one-page scope document that separates confirmed constraints from pending decisions, allowing item-by-item confirmation. Let me organize the material:\n\nConfirmed constraints (已定):\n- Internal approval systems merged: two parallel systems → one unified system\n- Budget cap: 40万 (400,000)\n- Timeline: Q1 go-live\n- Stakeholders: Finance (approver), Admin (initiator), IT (operations); Legal reviews contracts post-hoc\n- Mobile entry point retained\n- Approval chain max 5 levels\n- Historical data: read-only archive\n\nPending decisions (待决):\n- Paper-based fallback process? Admin insists, IT opposes\n- Acceptance criteria sign-off: Finance or Admin?\n- Does vendor need on-site implementation?\n- Archive retention period: 3 years or 5 years?\n\nI need to present this as a Markdown card. The format should be a single page scope document with clear separation between confirmed and pending items. Let me make it scannable for item-by-item confirmation.\n\nI should label my analytical remarks as such. The user's goal is to confirm items, so I should make checkboxes or clear confirmation points.\n\nLet me structure it:\n- Title\n- Section 1: 已定约束 (Confirmed Constraints)\n- Section 2: 待决事项 (Pending Decisions)\n- Each item should be checkable\n\nFor the conflicting items (paper fallback), I can note this is an analysis since the user asked me to flag conflicts.\n\nLet me draft:\n\n# 合并审批系统 · 范围确认页\n\n## 一、已定约束(基线,不可变更)\n- [ ] 范围:两套并行审批系统 → 合并为一套\n- [ ] 预算上限:40 万\n- [ ] 上线时间:Q1\n- [ ] 干系人角色:财务=审批人;行政=发起人;IT=运维;法务=事后复核合同\n- [ ] 保留移动端入口\n- [ ] 审批链最多 5 级\n- [ ] 历史数据:只读归档\n\n## 二、待决事项(需逐项确认)\n- [ ] **纸质兜底流程**:行政坚持保留 / IT 反对(存在立场冲突,建议拍板前由发起方说明理由)\n- [ ] **验收标准签署方**:财务 or 行政\n- [ ] **供应商实施方式**:是否要求驻场\n- [ ] **归档年限**:3 年 or 5 年\n\n## 三、下一步建议(分析)\n- 建议先确认 P1 中的冲突项(纸质兜底),因其影响系统架构冗余设计\n- 其余三项可在确认后分别落到合同条款与运维手册\n\nLet me refine this. The user wants \"一页能逐项确认的范围页\" - a one-page scope page that allows item-by-item confirmation. Checkboxes are appropriate.\n\nI should be careful: only state facts from the material, and mark analysis/judgments verbally.\n\nThe material is clear and complete. I don't need to invent anything. Let me make sure I'm not adding facts beyond the source.\n\nLet me reconsider - the \"下一步建议\" section is my analysis/suggestion, so I should clearly mark it as such. The user asked for a scope page for item-by-item confirmation, not necessarily for next steps. But a small analytical note about prioritization could be helpful since there's a clear conflict (paper fallback with opposing stakeholders).\n\nActually, let me re-read the user goal: \"把已定约束与待决事项分开呈现,给我一页能逐项确认的范围页\" - separate confirmed constraints from pending decisions, give me a one-page scope page for item-by-item confirmation.\n\nSo the core is just the separation and checkboxes. I can add a brief analysis note about the conflict since it's evident from the material.\n\nLet me finalize the format. Markdown card. Checkboxes for each item. Clear sections. Brief.</think>\n\n# 合并审批系统 · 范围确认页\n\n## 一、已定约束(基线 · 不可变更)\n- [ ] **系统范围**:两套并行审批系统 → 合并为一套\n- [ ] **预算上限**:40 万\n- [ ] **上线时间**:Q1\n- [ ] **干系人分工**:财务 = 审批人;行政 = 发起人;IT = 运维;法务 = 事后复核合同\n- [ ] **移动端入口**:保留\n- [ ] **审批链层级**:最多 5 级\n- [ ] **历史数据处理**:只读归档\n\n## 二、待决事项(需逐项拍板)\n- [ ] **纸质兜底流程是否保留** —— 行政坚持、IT 反对(立场冲突,待拍板方裁决)\n- [ ] **验收标准签署方** —— 财务 或 行政\n- [ ] **供应商实施方式** —— 是否要求驻场\n- [ ] **归档年限** —— 3 年 或 5 年\n\n---\n\n**分析提示**:四项待决中,「纸质兜底」一项存在明确立场对立,建议优先处理——是否保留纸质通道会直接影响系统冗余设计与运维责任划分;其余三项可顺次确认并分别落入合同条款、验收文档与归档策略。",
"think_stripped": true
}
+27
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
{
"task": "ri-07",
"family": "requirement-input",
"arm": "B",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "collect",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 1402,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 397,
"completion_tokens": 1005,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 128
}
},
"latency_s": 10.91
}
],
"callCount": 1,
"markdown": "# 待决问题收集表单\n\n> **填写说明**:请对每个问题直接选择或填写结果;标 ✱ 为必填项。所有项目需在本次收集完毕。\n\n---\n\n## 1. 旧系统下线窗口 ✱\n\n**问题**:旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度?\n\n| 选项 | 说明 |\n|---|---|\n| ☐ 允许跨季度 | 例:Q1 切换新系统,旧系统保留至 Q2 末再下线 |\n| ☐ 不允许跨季度 | 必须在本季度内完成下线 |\n| ☐ 其他:__________ | 请注明具体安排 |\n\n补充说明(可选):_________________________________\n\n---\n\n## 2. 验收标准签署方 ✱\n\n**问题**:验收标准由谁签署?\n\n| 选项 | 说明 |\n|---|---|\n| ☐ 财务 | 财务作为审批方主导签署 |\n| ☐ 行政 | 行政作为发起方主导签署 |\n| ☐ 财务 + 行政 双签 | 双方共同签署 |\n| ☐ 其他:__________ | 请注明 |\n\n---\n\n## 3. 供应商实施方式 ✱\n\n**问题**:供应商是否要求驻场实施?\n\n| 选项 | 说明 |\n|---|---|\n| ☐ 必须驻场 | 供应商人员需现场实施 |\n| ☐ 远程即可 | 远程支持可完成实施 |\n| ☐ 混合模式 | 关键阶段驻场,其余远程 |\n| ☐ 待谈判 | 尚未确认 |\n\n补充说明(可选):_________________________________\n\n---\n\n## 4. 并发审批上限 ✱\n\n**问题**:并发审批上限值设定?\n\n| 选项 | 说明 |\n|---|---|\n| ☐ 50 | 保守值,适配小并发场景 |\n| ☐ 200 | 较高值,适配大并发场景 |\n| ☐ 其他:__________ | 请注明具体数值 |\n\n依据(可选,例如历史峰值、压测数据):_________________________________\n\n---\n\n## 汇总确认\n\n| 项 | 我的选择 |\n|---|---|\n| 1. 下线窗口 | _____________ |\n| 2. 验收签署方 | _____________ |\n| 3. 供应商实施 | _____________ |\n| 4. 并发上限 | _____________ |\n\n**填写人**:_____________ **日期**:_____________\n\n---\n\n## 分析与建议(非定论,仅供参考)\n\n> 以下为基于材料背景的初步判断,需您结合实际情况确认。\n\n- **下线窗口**:建议优先选择\"**不允许跨季度**\",与\"Q1 上线\"的期望对齐,降低并行运维成本。✱ 跨季度会同时增加 IT 运维与历史数据只读归档的复杂度。\n- **验收签署**:结合干系人角色(财务=审批人、行政=发起人),建议采用\"**财务 + 行政 双签**\",单方签署易遗漏视角。注:材料未明确法务是否需介入验收签署,建议另列问题向法务确认。\n- **供应商实施**:预算 40 万体量下,\"**混合模式**\"通常在成本与风险间较为平衡。\n- **并发上限**:材料未给出历史峰值数据。若无压测依据,**建议先按 50 试运行**,后续按需调高至 200,避免一次性投入过载。",
"ok": true,
"wall_s": 10.9,
"raw_markdown": "<think>The user wants me to organize the open issues from the material into a fillable form page, marking required fields and options, to collect all at once.\n\nLet me extract the open issues from the material:\n1. 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度?(Old system decommissioning window - allowed across quarters?)\n2. 验收标准由谁签署:财务还是行政?(Acceptance criteria sign-off by whom: Finance or Admin?)\n3. 供应商是否要求驻场实施?(Does vendor require on-site implementation?)\n4. 并发审批上限:50 还是 200?(Concurrent approval limit: 50 or 200?)\n\nI need to organize these into a form with required fields marked and options provided. Let me think about what's appropriate:\n\n1. 跨季度下线窗口 - This is a yes/no question, could also need a brief explanation\n2. 验收签署 - Multiple choice between Finance/Admin/Other\n3. 驻场实施 - Yes/No\n4. 并发审批上限 - Multiple choice between 50/200/other\n\nI should mark these as required since the user wants to \"一次收集完\" (collect all at once).\n\nLet me format as a Markdown card with form fields. The user said \"表单页\" (form page) so I should structure it like a form with clear fields, labels, and options.\n\nLet me also include some analysis notes as the system prompt requires - \"你的判断与建议需口头标明是分析\" (your judgment and recommendations must verbally mark them as analysis).\n\nI'll organize this into a clean form structure with required markers and provide some brief analysis at the end about recommended defaults.</think>\n\n# 待决问题收集表单\n\n> **填写说明**:请对每个问题直接选择或填写结果;标 ✱ 为必填项。所有项目需在本次收集完毕。\n\n---\n\n## 1. 旧系统下线窗口 ✱\n\n**问题**:旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度?\n\n| 选项 | 说明 |\n|---|---|\n| ☐ 允许跨季度 | 例:Q1 切换新系统,旧系统保留至 Q2 末再下线 |\n| ☐ 不允许跨季度 | 必须在本季度内完成下线 |\n| ☐ 其他:__________ | 请注明具体安排 |\n\n补充说明(可选):_________________________________\n\n---\n\n## 2. 验收标准签署方 ✱\n\n**问题**:验收标准由谁签署?\n\n| 选项 | 说明 |\n|---|---|\n| ☐ 财务 | 财务作为审批方主导签署 |\n| ☐ 行政 | 行政作为发起方主导签署 |\n| ☐ 财务 + 行政 双签 | 双方共同签署 |\n| ☐ 其他:__________ | 请注明 |\n\n---\n\n## 3. 供应商实施方式 ✱\n\n**问题**:供应商是否要求驻场实施?\n\n| 选项 | 说明 |\n|---|---|\n| ☐ 必须驻场 | 供应商人员需现场实施 |\n| ☐ 远程即可 | 远程支持可完成实施 |\n| ☐ 混合模式 | 关键阶段驻场,其余远程 |\n| ☐ 待谈判 | 尚未确认 |\n\n补充说明(可选):_________________________________\n\n---\n\n## 4. 并发审批上限 ✱\n\n**问题**:并发审批上限值设定?\n\n| 选项 | 说明 |\n|---|---|\n| ☐ 50 | 保守值,适配小并发场景 |\n| ☐ 200 | 较高值,适配大并发场景 |\n| ☐ 其他:__________ | 请注明具体数值 |\n\n依据(可选,例如历史峰值、压测数据):_________________________________\n\n---\n\n## 汇总确认\n\n| 项 | 我的选择 |\n|---|---|\n| 1. 下线窗口 | _____________ |\n| 2. 验收签署方 | _____________ |\n| 3. 供应商实施 | _____________ |\n| 4. 并发上限 | _____________ |\n\n**填写人**:_____________ **日期**:_____________\n\n---\n\n## 分析与建议(非定论,仅供参考)\n\n> 以下为基于材料背景的初步判断,需您结合实际情况确认。\n\n- **下线窗口**:建议优先选择\"**不允许跨季度**\",与\"Q1 上线\"的期望对齐,降低并行运维成本。✱ 跨季度会同时增加 IT 运维与历史数据只读归档的复杂度。\n- **验收签署**:结合干系人角色(财务=审批人、行政=发起人),建议采用\"**财务 + 行政 双签**\",单方签署易遗漏视角。注:材料未明确法务是否需介入验收签署,建议另列问题向法务确认。\n- **供应商实施**:预算 40 万体量下,\"**混合模式**\"通常在成本与风险间较为平衡。\n- **并发上限**:材料未给出历史峰值数据。若无压测依据,**建议先按 50 试运行**,后续按需调高至 200,避免一次性投入过载。",
"think_stripped": true
}
+30
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
{
"task": "ri-08",
"family": "requirement-input",
"arm": "B",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "confirm",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 1411,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 399,
"completion_tokens": 1012,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"reasoning_tokens": 355
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 128
}
},
"latency_s": 8.48
}
],
"callCount": 1,
"markdown": "# 审批系统合并项目 · 范围确认页\n\n> 单页用于逐项确认已定约束与待决事项,请相关干系人逐条勾选/反馈。\n\n---\n\n## 一、项目基本信息(来自背景说明)\n\n| 项 | 内容 |\n|---|---|\n| 目标 | 把内部审批从**两套并行系统**合并为**一套** |\n| 预算上限 | **40 万** |\n| 期望上线 | **Q1** |\n| 干系人 | 财务(审批人)、行政(发起人)、IT(运维);法务**事后复核合同** |\n\n---\n\n## 二、已定约束(锁定,不再讨论)\n\n| # | 约束 | 确认 |\n|---|---|---|\n| C1 | **保留移动端入口** | ☐ |\n| C2 | **审批链最多 5 级** | ☐ |\n| C3 | **历史数据只读归档** | ☐ |\n\n---\n\n## 三、待决事项(需逐项拍板)\n\n> 每项给出可选方案与立场,建议开会前书面表态,避免会上反复。\n\n### Q1 · 并发审批上限\n\n| 选项 | 说明 |\n|---|---|\n| A. **50** | 保守,资源占用低 |\n| B. **200** | 高并发,覆盖大促/月末集中审批场景 |\n\n- 立场:**未记录到干系人表态**(需 IT 提供容量测算依据)\n- 当前选择:☐ A ☐ B\n\n### Q2 · 验收标准签署方\n\n| 选项 | 说明 |\n|---|---|\n| A. **财务** | 强调审批口径合规 |\n| B. **行政** | 强调业务可用性与流程闭环 |\n\n- 立场:**两方各有主张,未达成一致**\n- 当前选择:☐ A ☐ B\n\n### Q3 · 是否保留纸质兜底流程\n\n| 选项 | 立场 |\n|---|---|\n| A. **保留纸质兜底** | 行政坚持(出于业务连续性考量,分析认为其担心系统故障期无法发起审批) |\n| B. **不保留** | IT 反对(出于运维成本与\"双轨制\"抵消合并收益的考量,分析认为会增加维护负担) |\n\n- 当前选择:☐ A ☐ B\n\n### Q4 · 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度\n\n| 选项 | 说明 |\n|---|---|\n| A. **本季度内下线** | 利于预算与运维一次性切换 |\n| B. **允许跨季度** | 利于历史数据只读归档期内的查询兜底 |\n\n- 立场:**未记录到干系人表态**\n- 当前选择:☐ A ☐ B\n\n---\n\n## 四、确认栏\n\n- 财务:________________ 日期:__________\n- 行政:________________ 日期:__________\n- IT:________________ __________________\n- 法务(事后复核,仅备案):________________\n\n> 备注:以上\"分析\"标注项为基于材料中各方立场做出的推断判断,非材料原文表述;其余内容均直接来源于【req:eval/ri-07/context】与【req:eval/ri-07/open】。",
"ok": true,
"wall_s": 8.5,
"raw_markdown": "<think>The user wants a one-page scope document that separates 已定约束 (decided constraints) from 待决事项 (open items), formatted as a Markdown card. I need to use only facts from the materials, and mark any analysis/judgment verbally as \"分析\".\n\nLet me parse the materials:\n\nFrom context (req:eval/ri-07/context):\n- Background: Merge two parallel internal approval systems into one, budget cap 40万, expected online in Q1\n- Stakeholders: 财务 (approver), 行政 (initiator), IT (operations); 法务 reviews contracts afterwards\n- Decided:\n - 保留移动端入口\n - 审批链最多 5 级\n - 历史数据只读归档\n\nFrom open (req:eval/ri-07/open):\n- Open items:\n - 并发审批上限:50 还是 200?\n - 验收标准由谁签署:财务还是行政?\n - 是否需要纸质兜底流程?行政坚持,IT 反对\n - 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度?\n\nI need to present this as a clean one-page scope confirmation document. The user wants to confirm each item, so it should be structured for逐项确认 (item-by-item confirmation).\n\nLet me structure as:\n1. 项目背景 (brief)\n2. 已定约束 (decided - 锁定的范围)\n3. 待决事项 (open - 需决策的项)\n\nFor each待决 item, I should present the options clearly.\n\nLet me draft this carefully. The output should be a Markdown card — so it should be self-contained, clean, formatted well.\n\nI should not add extra explanation outside the card. Output = card body.\n\nLet me write it:</think>\n\n# 审批系统合并项目 · 范围确认页\n\n> 单页用于逐项确认已定约束与待决事项,请相关干系人逐条勾选/反馈。\n\n---\n\n## 一、项目基本信息(来自背景说明)\n\n| 项 | 内容 |\n|---|---|\n| 目标 | 把内部审批从**两套并行系统**合并为**一套** |\n| 预算上限 | **40 万** |\n| 期望上线 | **Q1** |\n| 干系人 | 财务(审批人)、行政(发起人)、IT(运维);法务**事后复核合同** |\n\n---\n\n## 二、已定约束(锁定,不再讨论)\n\n| # | 约束 | 确认 |\n|---|---|---|\n| C1 | **保留移动端入口** | ☐ |\n| C2 | **审批链最多 5 级** | ☐ |\n| C3 | **历史数据只读归档** | ☐ |\n\n---\n\n## 三、待决事项(需逐项拍板)\n\n> 每项给出可选方案与立场,建议开会前书面表态,避免会上反复。\n\n### Q1 · 并发审批上限\n\n| 选项 | 说明 |\n|---|---|\n| A. **50** | 保守,资源占用低 |\n| B. **200** | 高并发,覆盖大促/月末集中审批场景 |\n\n- 立场:**未记录到干系人表态**(需 IT 提供容量测算依据)\n- 当前选择:☐ A ☐ B\n\n### Q2 · 验收标准签署方\n\n| 选项 | 说明 |\n|---|---|\n| A. **财务** | 强调审批口径合规 |\n| B. **行政** | 强调业务可用性与流程闭环 |\n\n- 立场:**两方各有主张,未达成一致**\n- 当前选择:☐ A ☐ B\n\n### Q3 · 是否保留纸质兜底流程\n\n| 选项 | 立场 |\n|---|---|\n| A. **保留纸质兜底** | 行政坚持(出于业务连续性考量,分析认为其担心系统故障期无法发起审批) |\n| B. **不保留** | IT 反对(出于运维成本与\"双轨制\"抵消合并收益的考量,分析认为会增加维护负担) |\n\n- 当前选择:☐ A ☐ B\n\n### Q4 · 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度\n\n| 选项 | 说明 |\n|---|---|\n| A. **本季度内下线** | 利于预算与运维一次性切换 |\n| B. **允许跨季度** | 利于历史数据只读归档期内的查询兜底 |\n\n- 立场:**未记录到干系人表态**\n- 当前选择:☐ A ☐ B\n\n---\n\n## 四、确认栏\n\n- 财务:________________ 日期:__________\n- 行政:________________ 日期:__________\n- IT:________________ __________________\n- 法务(事后复核,仅备案):________________\n\n> 备注:以上\"分析\"标注项为基于材料中各方立场做出的推断判断,非材料原文表述;其余内容均直接来源于【req:eval/ri-07/context】与【req:eval/ri-07/open】。",
"think_stripped": true
}
+28
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
{
"task": "ri-09",
"family": "requirement-input",
"arm": "B",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "collect",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 1503,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 402,
"completion_tokens": 1101,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"reasoning_tokens": 493
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 128
}
},
"latency_s": 11.02
}
],
"callCount": 1,
"markdown": "# 决策收集表 · 合并审批系统\n\n> 本表用于一次收集【req:eval/ri-08/open】中四项待决问题。请各干系人在对应字段填写结论。\n\n---\n\n## 基本信息(必填)\n\n| 字段 | 内容 |\n|---|---|\n| 填表人 | ____________ |\n| 角色 | ☐ 财务(审批人) ☐ 行政(发起人) ☐ IT(运维) ☐ 法务(事后复核) |\n| 填表日期 | ____________ |\n\n---\n\n## 待决问题(每项均必填)\n\n### ① 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度?\n\n- **类型**:单选\n- **关联约束**:期望 Q1 上线(来自 context)\n- **选项**:\n - ☐ 不允许跨季度(须在 Q1 内完成下线)\n - ☐ 允许跨季度(可延至 Q2)\n - ☐ 其他:____________\n\n### ② 历史数据归档年限\n\n- **类型**:单选\n- **关联约束**:归档只读(context 强制),其余决策维度需自评\n- **选项**:\n - ☐ 3 年\n - ☐ 5 年\n - ☐ 其他:____________\n- **决策依据(选填)**:☐ 法规要求 ☐ 成本考量 ☐ 审计需要 ☐ 其他\n\n### ③ 供应商是否要求驻场实施?\n\n- **类型**:单选\n- **关联约束**:预算上限 40 万(来自 context)——分析:驻场通常推高人力成本,需与预算联动确认\n- **选项**:\n - ☐ 要求驻场(预估溢价:____ 万)\n - ☐ 不要求驻场(远程实施)\n - ☐ 视情况(说明条件):____________\n\n### ④ 是否保留纸质兜底流程?\n\n- **类型**:单选(已有分歧,需最终裁决)\n- **关联约束**:行政坚持保留,IT 反对;无 context 硬性约束\n- **分歧记录**:\n - 行政立场:坚持保留(理由:____)\n - IT 立场:反对保留(理由:____)\n- **选项**:\n - ☐ 保留纸质兜底\n - ☐ 不保留,全线上\n - ☐ 折中方案(说明):____________\n- **最终裁决人**:____________\n\n---\n\n## 交叉影响提示(分析)\n\n- 若①选\"跨季度\",与 Q1 上线期望冲突,需重新对齐上线时间。\n- 若③选\"驻场\",建议同步复核 40 万预算上限是否可承受(分析)。\n- 若④选\"保留\",需评估是否与\"保留移动端入口\"形成双通道运维负担(分析)。\n\n---\n\n## 提交\n\n填完后回填本表,IT 汇总后进入下一决策环节。",
"ok": true,
"wall_s": 11.0
}
+30
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
{
"task": "ri-10",
"family": "requirement-input",
"arm": "B",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "confirm",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 1130,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 398,
"completion_tokens": 732,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"reasoning_tokens": 235
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 128
}
},
"latency_s": 6.18
}
],
"callCount": 1,
"markdown": "# 范围确认页|内部审批系统合并\n\n## 一、已定约束(基线)\n\n| # | 约束项 | 取值 | 备注 |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| 1 | 系统整合目标 | 两套并行审批系统合并为一套 | — |\n| 2 | 预算上限 | 40 万 | — |\n| 3 | 上线时间 | Q1 | — |\n| 4 | 移动端入口 | 保留 | — |\n| 5 | 审批链级数 | 最多 5 级 | — |\n| 6 | 历史数据处置 | 只读归档 | 不迁移至新审批流 |\n| 7 | 干系人—财务 | 审批人 | — |\n| 8 | 干系人—行政 | 发起人 | — |\n| 9 | 干系人—IT | 运维 | — |\n| 10 | 干系人—法务 | 事后复核合同 | 不嵌入审批链 |\n\n## 二、待决事项(需逐项确认)\n\n### D1|归档年限\n- 选项 A:3 年\n- 选项 B:5 年\n- ☐ 确认:_____\n\n### D2|并发审批上限\n- 选项 A:50\n- 选项 B:200\n- ☐ 确认:_____\n\n### D3|是否需要纸质兜底流程\n- 立场:行政坚持,IT 反对\n- ☐ 确认:需要 / 不需要\n\n### D4|供应商是否要求驻场实施\n- ☐ 确认:要求 / 不要求\n\n## 三、口头分析(不构成决定,仅供参考)\n\n- **D1**:若历史数据仅\"只读归档\"、无业务查询压力,3 年通常可覆盖常规审计周期;若财务或合规另有 5 年强制要求,需提前对齐法务口径。\n- **D2**:50 偏保守,200 更适合合并后的统一入口量级;但需 IT 同步评估中间件与消息通道承载能力。\n- **D3**:纸质兜底与\"合并为一套系统\"的精简目标存在张力,建议明确兜底仅作灾备而非日常并行通道,否则两套体系实质未合并。\n- **D4**:驻场会显著影响 40 万预算与 Q1 上线节奏;若必须驻场,需在合同与排期上预留缓冲。",
"ok": true,
"wall_s": 6.2,
"raw_markdown": "<think>The user wants a range/scope document page that separates already-fixed constraints from pending/open items, allowing them to confirm each one item by item. The output should be a Markdown card.\n\nLet me organize the content:\n\n**Fixed/Determined constraints:**\n- Consolidate two parallel approval systems into one\n- Budget cap: 400,000\n- Target launch: Q1\n- Stakeholders: Finance (approver), Admin (initiator), IT (operations); Legal reviews contracts after the fact\n- Preserve mobile entry\n- Approval chain max 5 levels\n- Historical data: read-only archive\n\n**Open/Pending items:**\n1. Archive retention period: 3 years or 5 years?\n2. Concurrent approval limit: 50 or 200?\n3. Paper fallback process needed? Admin insists, IT opposes.\n4. Does vendor require on-site implementation?\n\nI need to:\n- Only use facts provided, no fabrication\n- Mark judgments/recommendations as analysis\n- Output as a card (Markdown), no extra commentary\n- Make it a one-page scope confirmation sheet with each item confirmable\n\nLet me format this cleanly as a Markdown card.</think>\n\n# 范围确认页|内部审批系统合并\n\n## 一、已定约束(基线)\n\n| # | 约束项 | 取值 | 备注 |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| 1 | 系统整合目标 | 两套并行审批系统合并为一套 | — |\n| 2 | 预算上限 | 40 万 | — |\n| 3 | 上线时间 | Q1 | — |\n| 4 | 移动端入口 | 保留 | — |\n| 5 | 审批链级数 | 最多 5 级 | — |\n| 6 | 历史数据处置 | 只读归档 | 不迁移至新审批流 |\n| 7 | 干系人—财务 | 审批人 | — |\n| 8 | 干系人—行政 | 发起人 | — |\n| 9 | 干系人—IT | 运维 | — |\n| 10 | 干系人—法务 | 事后复核合同 | 不嵌入审批链 |\n\n## 二、待决事项(需逐项确认)\n\n### D1|归档年限\n- 选项 A:3 年\n- 选项 B:5 年\n- ☐ 确认:_____\n\n### D2|并发审批上限\n- 选项 A:50\n- 选项 B:200\n- ☐ 确认:_____\n\n### D3|是否需要纸质兜底流程\n- 立场:行政坚持,IT 反对\n- ☐ 确认:需要 / 不需要\n\n### D4|供应商是否要求驻场实施\n- ☐ 确认:要求 / 不要求\n\n## 三、口头分析(不构成决定,仅供参考)\n\n- **D1**:若历史数据仅\"只读归档\"、无业务查询压力,3 年通常可覆盖常规审计周期;若财务或合规另有 5 年强制要求,需提前对齐法务口径。\n- **D2**:50 偏保守,200 更适合合并后的统一入口量级;但需 IT 同步评估中间件与消息通道承载能力。\n- **D3**:纸质兜底与\"合并为一套系统\"的精简目标存在张力,建议明确兜底仅作灾备而非日常并行通道,否则两套体系实质未合并。\n- **D4**:驻场会显著影响 40 万预算与 Q1 上线节奏;若必须驻场,需在合同与排期上预留缓冲。",
"think_stripped": true
}
+30
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
{
"task": "to-01",
"family": "task-overview",
"arm": "B",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "progress",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 859,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 440,
"completion_tokens": 419,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"reasoning_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 128
}
},
"latency_s": 6.34
}
],
"callCount": 1,
"markdown": "# 任务进度卡片:交付门禁自动化(eval/to-00)\n\n## 📊 当前进度\n\n| 步骤 | 状态 |\n|---|---|\n| 需求冻结 | ✅ done |\n| 契约定义 | ✅ done(10-11 评审通过,含两处字段口径修订) |\n| **存储迁移** | 🔄 **in_progress** |\n| 灰度开关 | ⏳ pending |\n| 回退演练 | ⏳ pending |\n\n整体完成度:2/5 done + 1 in_progress(分析:约 60%,处于中后段)\n\n---\n\n## 🎯 下一步\n\n**主路径**:推进**存储迁移**收尾\n- 预发已跑通(14m),下一步应为**正式环境执行**(分析)\n- 迁移完成后才能解锁**灰度开关**与**回退演练**两个 pending 项\n\n---\n\n## ⚠️ 需关注(基于材料的分析)\n\n- **回退演练**草案已提交但**缺少数据校验步骤**,建议补齐后再进入演练排期(分析)\n- **灰度开关**当前在等待安全评审排期(10-09 起已 2 天无更新),可能成为后续瓶颈(分析)\n\n---\n\n## 📎 已有产物\n\n- 需求清单 v3(doc)\n- 迁移脚本 runbook(doc)\n- 评审纪要 10-11(doc)",
"ok": true,
"wall_s": 6.3,
"raw_markdown": "<think>The user wants a quick view of task status and next step. I'll create a Markdown card based only on the materials provided, clearly marking any analysis as such.\n\nLet me organize:\n- Steps status: 需求冻结 done, 契约定义 done, 存储迁移 in_progress, 灰度开关 pending, 回退演练 pending\n- Recent log entries with dates\n- Artifacts list\n\nI need to present this cleanly. The user wants to know:\n1. Where it stands now\n2. What's next\n\nI'll structure as a status card with progress, next step, and risk notes (marked as analysis).</think>\n\n# 任务进度卡片:交付门禁自动化(eval/to-00)\n\n## 📊 当前进度\n\n| 步骤 | 状态 |\n|---|---|\n| 需求冻结 | ✅ done |\n| 契约定义 | ✅ done(10-11 评审通过,含两处字段口径修订) |\n| **存储迁移** | 🔄 **in_progress** |\n| 灰度开关 | ⏳ pending |\n| 回退演练 | ⏳ pending |\n\n整体完成度:2/5 done + 1 in_progress(分析:约 60%,处于中后段)\n\n---\n\n## 🎯 下一步\n\n**主路径**:推进**存储迁移**收尾\n- 预发已跑通(14m),下一步应为**正式环境执行**(分析)\n- 迁移完成后才能解锁**灰度开关**与**回退演练**两个 pending 项\n\n---\n\n## ⚠️ 需关注(基于材料的分析)\n\n- **回退演练**草案已提交但**缺少数据校验步骤**,建议补齐后再进入演练排期(分析)\n- **灰度开关**当前在等待安全评审排期(10-09 起已 2 天无更新),可能成为后续瓶颈(分析)\n\n---\n\n## 📎 已有产物\n\n- 需求清单 v3(doc)\n- 迁移脚本 runbook(doc)\n- 评审纪要 10-11(doc)",
"think_stripped": true
}
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
+30
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
{
"task": "to-04",
"family": "task-overview",
"arm": "B",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "progress",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 1139,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 440,
"completion_tokens": 699,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"reasoning_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 0
}
},
"latency_s": 7.87
}
],
"callCount": 1,
"markdown": "## 交付门禁自动化 · 当前进度\n\n**整体:5 步已完成 2,正进行 1,剩余 2** | 最近更新 10-11\n\n### 已完成\n- ✅ **需求冻结**\n- ✅ **契约定义**(10-11 评审通过,含两处字段口径修订)\n\n### 进行中\n- 🔄 **存储迁移** — 10-08 预发跑通,耗时 14m;待正式环境落地\n\n### 下一步\n1. **存储迁移**:预发已验证,建议推进到生产执行(runbook 已就绪)\n2. **灰度开关**:待安全评审排期——*分析:这是当前最大的排期阻塞点*\n3. **回退演练**:草案已交,但**缺少数据校验步骤**——*分析:建议先补齐这一步再走演练*\n\n### 风险与阻塞\n- 🔴 **安全评审排期未定** → 灰度开关无法启动,会延迟整条链路\n- 🟡 **回退演练缺数据校验** → 若不补齐,演练覆盖度不足,上线有隐患\n\n### 已有产物\n- 需求清单 v3 / 迁移脚本 runbook / 评审纪要 10-11\n\n**建议关注顺序**:先把「回退演练·数据校验」补齐 → 跟进安全评审排期 → 推动存储迁移上生产。",
"ok": true,
"wall_s": 7.9,
"raw_markdown": "<think>The user wants a quick status update on the \"交付门禁自动化\" task, specifically: where it stands now and what's next.\n\nLet me parse the materials:\n\n**Current status from steps:**\n- 需求冻结: done\n- 契约定义: done\n- 存储迁移: in_progress (current)\n- 灰度开关: pending\n- 回退演练: pending\n\nSo 2/5 done, 1 in progress, 2 pending.\n\n**Recent log highlights:**\n- 10-08: 存储迁移脚本 pre-prod passed, 14m runtime\n- 10-09: 灰度开关 waiting for security review scheduling\n- 10-10: 回退演练 draft submitted, missing data validation step\n- 10-11: 契约定义 review passed, two field spec revisions\n\n**Artifacts:**\n- 需求清单 v3 (doc)\n- 迁移脚本 runbook (doc)\n- 评审纪要 10-11 (doc)\n\n**Analysis for next step:**\n- 存储迁移 is in progress (script ran in pre-prod successfully)\n- The most recent action was 10-11 契约评审通过 - but 契约定义 is already marked done\n- The actual in_progress item is 存储迁移 - pre-prod run succeeded, so likely needs production rollout\n- Next in line is 灰度开关 - but blocked on 安全评审排期 (scheduling)\n- 回退演练 has a known gap: missing data validation step\n\nRisks/blockers:\n1. 灰度开关 blocked by 安全评审排期\n2. 回退演练 has known gap (缺数据校验步骤)\n\nLet me build a Markdown card. The card should be concise and actionable. I should mark analysis/judgments as such.\n\nFormat considerations:\n- Title with status overview\n- Progress section\n- Next step section\n- Risks/blockers section\n- Keep it scannable\n\nLet me write it as a Markdown card body.</think>\n\n## 交付门禁自动化 · 当前进度\n\n**整体:5 步已完成 2,正进行 1,剩余 2** | 最近更新 10-11\n\n### 已完成\n- ✅ **需求冻结**\n- ✅ **契约定义**(10-11 评审通过,含两处字段口径修订)\n\n### 进行中\n- 🔄 **存储迁移** — 10-08 预发跑通,耗时 14m;待正式环境落地\n\n### 下一步\n1. **存储迁移**:预发已验证,建议推进到生产执行(runbook 已就绪)\n2. **灰度开关**:待安全评审排期——*分析:这是当前最大的排期阻塞点*\n3. **回退演练**:草案已交,但**缺少数据校验步骤**——*分析:建议先补齐这一步再走演练*\n\n### 风险与阻塞\n- 🔴 **安全评审排期未定** → 灰度开关无法启动,会延迟整条链路\n- 🟡 **回退演练缺数据校验** → 若不补齐,演练覆盖度不足,上线有隐患\n\n### 已有产物\n- 需求清单 v3 / 迁移脚本 runbook / 评审纪要 10-11\n\n**建议关注顺序**:先把「回退演练·数据校验」补齐 → 跟进安全评审排期 → 推动存储迁移上生产。",
"think_stripped": true
}
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
+27
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
{
"task": "to-06",
"family": "task-overview",
"arm": "B",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "handover",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 1363,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 445,
"completion_tokens": 918,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 128
}
},
"latency_s": 8.96
}
],
"callCount": 1,
"markdown": "# 任务交接页:交付门禁自动化\n\n## 一、任务背景\n\n「交付门禁自动化」共拆分为 5 个步骤,当前整体处于中后段:前两步已完成,中间一步在跑,后两步未启动。\n\n| 步骤 | 状态 |\n| --- | --- |\n| 需求冻结 | ✅ done |\n| 契约定义 | ✅ done |\n| 存储迁移 | 🟡 in_progress |\n| 灰度开关 | ⏳ pending |\n| 回退演练 | ⏳ pending |\n\n## 二、当前状态要点\n\n- **契约定义(done)**:10-11 评审通过;存在两处字段口径修订,需留意后续接入方是否已同步到最新版本。\n- **存储迁移(in_progress)**:10-08 迁移脚本在预发环境跑通,耗时 14 分钟。预发已验证,尚未看到正式环境执行记录。\n- **灰度开关(pending)**:10-09 正在等待安全评审排期,是当前的外部依赖。\n- **回退演练(pending)**:10-10 草案已提交,但**缺少数据校验步骤**。\n\n## 三、接手事项(按优先级)\n\n1. **推进存储迁移落地**:预发已通,需排定正式环境执行窗口与变更窗口。\n2. **跟催灰度开关的安全评审**:10-09 起在等排期,建议主动确认评审人/时间。\n3. **补齐回退演练草案**:重点补\"数据校验步骤\",再走评审。\n4. **同步契约口径修订**:两处字段口径变化需告知下游接入方,避免上线后不一致。\n\n> 以上排序基于材料中各事项的紧迫信号(外部依赖、草案缺陷)得出,属于分析建议。\n\n## 四、产物索引\n\n- 📄 需求清单 v3(doc)\n- 📄 迁移脚本 runbook(doc)\n- 📄 评审纪要 10-11(doc)\n\n> ⚠️ 提示:灰度开关与回退演练目前**没有对应的正式产物**列在制品清单中,移交时建议一并确认是否遗漏归档。\n\n## 五、移交前请交接人确认\n\n- [ ] 正式环境存储迁移的排期是否已对齐?\n- [ ] 安全评审联系人是否已确认?\n- [ ] 回退演练中的\"数据校验步骤\"归属谁负责补齐?",
"ok": true,
"wall_s": 9.0,
"raw_markdown": "<think>The user wants me to organize the given materials into a handover page that helps new colleagues understand the background, current status, and items to take over. Let me analyze the materials carefully.\n\nFrom the materials:\n1. Task name: 交付门禁自动化 (Delivery Gate Automation)\n2. Steps status:\n - 需求冻结 (Requirements Freeze): done\n - 契约定义 (Contract Definition): done\n - 存储迁移 (Storage Migration): in_progress\n - 灰度开关 (Grayscale Switch): pending\n - 回退演练 (Rollback Drill): pending\n\n3. Recent dynamics:\n - 10-08 09:12: Storage migration script ran successfully in pre-production, took 14 minutes\n - 10-09 15:40: Grayscale switch is waiting for security review scheduling\n - 10-10 11:05: Rollback drill draft submitted, lacks data validation steps\n - 10-11 10:30: Contract definition review passed, two field caliber revisions\n\n4. Artifacts:\n - Requirements list v3 (doc)\n - Migration script runbook (doc)\n - Review minutes 10-11 (doc)\n\nLet me organize this into a handover page. I need to:\n1. Cover background (what the task is)\n2. Current status (where things stand)\n3. Handover items (what needs to be done)\n\nI should use only facts from the materials and mark analyses/recommendations as such. Output should be a Markdown card with no extra explanation.\n\nLet me structure it:\n\n## 任务交接页:交付门禁自动化\n\n### 背景\n- 任务:交付门禁自动化\n- 阶段:进行中(5 个步骤)\n- 完成:需求冻结、契约定义\n- 进行中:存储迁移\n- 待启动:灰度开关、回退演练\n\n### 当前状态(按步骤)\n...\n\n### 接手事项 / 待办\n...\n\n### 产物索引\n...\n\n### 分析与建议\n...\n\nLet me draft this carefully.</think>\n\n# 任务交接页:交付门禁自动化\n\n## 一、任务背景\n\n「交付门禁自动化」共拆分为 5 个步骤,当前整体处于中后段:前两步已完成,中间一步在跑,后两步未启动。\n\n| 步骤 | 状态 |\n| --- | --- |\n| 需求冻结 | ✅ done |\n| 契约定义 | ✅ done |\n| 存储迁移 | 🟡 in_progress |\n| 灰度开关 | ⏳ pending |\n| 回退演练 | ⏳ pending |\n\n## 二、当前状态要点\n\n- **契约定义(done)**:10-11 评审通过;存在两处字段口径修订,需留意后续接入方是否已同步到最新版本。\n- **存储迁移(in_progress)**:10-08 迁移脚本在预发环境跑通,耗时 14 分钟。预发已验证,尚未看到正式环境执行记录。\n- **灰度开关(pending)**:10-09 正在等待安全评审排期,是当前的外部依赖。\n- **回退演练(pending)**:10-10 草案已提交,但**缺少数据校验步骤**。\n\n## 三、接手事项(按优先级)\n\n1. **推进存储迁移落地**:预发已通,需排定正式环境执行窗口与变更窗口。\n2. **跟催灰度开关的安全评审**:10-09 起在等排期,建议主动确认评审人/时间。\n3. **补齐回退演练草案**:重点补\"数据校验步骤\",再走评审。\n4. **同步契约口径修订**:两处字段口径变化需告知下游接入方,避免上线后不一致。\n\n> 以上排序基于材料中各事项的紧迫信号(外部依赖、草案缺陷)得出,属于分析建议。\n\n## 四、产物索引\n\n- 📄 需求清单 v3(doc)\n- 📄 迁移脚本 runbook(doc)\n- 📄 评审纪要 10-11(doc)\n\n> ⚠️ 提示:灰度开关与回退演练目前**没有对应的正式产物**列在制品清单中,移交时建议一并确认是否遗漏归档。\n\n## 五、移交前请交接人确认\n\n- [ ] 正式环境存储迁移的排期是否已对齐?\n- [ ] 安全评审联系人是否已确认?\n- [ ] 回退演练中的\"数据校验步骤\"归属谁负责补齐?",
"think_stripped": true
}
+27
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
{
"task": "to-07",
"family": "task-overview",
"arm": "B",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "progress",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 1362,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 440,
"completion_tokens": 922,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 128
}
},
"latency_s": 10.11
}
],
"callCount": 1,
"markdown": "# 任务:交付门禁自动化(to-06)\n\n## 📍 进度概览\n\n| 步骤 | 状态 | 说明 |\n|---|---|---|\n| 需求冻结 | ✅ done | — |\n| 契约定义 | ✅ done | 10-11 评审通过,含两处字段口径修订 |\n| 存储迁移 | 🔄 in_progress | 预发 14m 通过 |\n| 灰度开关 | ⏸ pending | 等待安全评审排期 |\n| 回退演练 | ⏸ pending | 草案已提交,缺数据校验步骤 |\n\n## ⏭ 下一步\n\n1. **存储迁移**:推进到正式环境收尾(分析:预发已跑通,属于就绪状态)\n2. **回退演练**:在草案中补齐数据校验步骤后再提交\n3. **灰度开关**:跟进安全评审排期(分析:此为外部依赖,应尽早推动)\n\n## ⚠ 风险提示(分析)\n\n- **外部依赖**:灰度开关卡在安全评审排期,时间不可控,建议主动对齐评审方\n- **方案不完备**:回退演练缺数据校验步骤,演练结果可信度受影响,需先补齐\n- **建议顺序**:先补回退校验 → 再排安全评审 → 演练通过后开灰度\n\n## 📎 产物\n\n- 需求清单 v3\n- 迁移脚本 runbook\n- 评审纪要 10-11",
"ok": true,
"wall_s": 10.1,
"raw_markdown": "<think>The user wants a quick status card for the task \"交付门禁自动化\" (Delivery Gate Automation). They want to know:\n1. Where the task is now (progress)\n2. What's the next step\n\nLet me synthesize the information from the three sources:\n\n**Steps status:**\n- 需求冻结 (Requirements freeze): done\n- 契约定义 (Contract definition): done\n- 存储迁移 (Storage migration): in_progress\n- 灰度开关 (Gray release switch): pending\n- 回退演练 (Rollback drill): pending\n\n**Recent log:**\n- 10-08: Storage migration script ran successfully in staging, took 14m\n- 10-09: Gray release switch waiting for security review scheduling\n- 10-10: Rollback drill draft submitted, missing data validation step\n- 10-11: Contract definition review approved, with two field definition revisions\n\n**Artifacts:**\n- 需求清单 v3 (Requirements list v3)\n- 迁移脚本 runbook (Migration script runbook)\n- 评审纪要 10-11 (Review minutes 10-11)\n\nKey analysis for the card:\n- Current phase: Storage migration (in progress, already ran in staging in 14m - so this is going well)\n- Blockers/risks I can identify:\n - Gray release switch is pending security review scheduling (potential external dependency)\n - Rollback drill draft lacks data validation step (need to add this)\n- Next step: Storage migration completion, then gray switch needs security review, and rollback needs data validation added\n\nThe user wants a Markdown card format. Let me structure this clearly with:\n- Status overview\n- Current phase detail\n- Next steps (concrete)\n- Risks/blocks (analytical, since I'm inferring)\n\nI need to label any analytical/judgment content as such (口头标明是分析).\n\nLet me draft:\n\n## 任务:交付门禁自动化\n\n**进度概览**\n- ✅ 需求冻结\n- ✅ 契约定义(10-11 评审通过,含两处字段口径修订)\n- 🔄 存储迁移(预发 14m 通过,进行中)\n- ⏸ 灰度开关(待安全评审排期)\n- ⏸ 回退演练(草案已提交,缺少数据校验步骤)\n\n**下一步**\n1. 完成存储迁移(分析:预发已跑通,可推进正式环境)\n2. 回退演练草案需补齐数据校验步骤\n3. 跟进安全评审排期,解锁灰度开关\n\n**风险与阻塞(分析)**\n- 灰度开关受限于安全评审排期,属外部依赖,存在时间不确定\n- 回退演练缺少数据校验步骤,演练方案未完备,需先补齐再演练\n\n**产物**\n- 需求清单 v3\n- 迁移脚本 runbook\n- 评审纪要 10-11\n\nThis is concise and addresses both \"where we are\" and \"next steps.\" Let me refine it.</think>\n\n# 任务:交付门禁自动化(to-06)\n\n## 📍 进度概览\n\n| 步骤 | 状态 | 说明 |\n|---|---|---|\n| 需求冻结 | ✅ done | — |\n| 契约定义 | ✅ done | 10-11 评审通过,含两处字段口径修订 |\n| 存储迁移 | 🔄 in_progress | 预发 14m 通过 |\n| 灰度开关 | ⏸ pending | 等待安全评审排期 |\n| 回退演练 | ⏸ pending | 草案已提交,缺数据校验步骤 |\n\n## ⏭ 下一步\n\n1. **存储迁移**:推进到正式环境收尾(分析:预发已跑通,属于就绪状态)\n2. **回退演练**:在草案中补齐数据校验步骤后再提交\n3. **灰度开关**:跟进安全评审排期(分析:此为外部依赖,应尽早推动)\n\n## ⚠ 风险提示(分析)\n\n- **外部依赖**:灰度开关卡在安全评审排期,时间不可控,建议主动对齐评审方\n- **方案不完备**:回退演练缺数据校验步骤,演练结果可信度受影响,需先补齐\n- **建议顺序**:先补回退校验 → 再排安全评审 → 演练通过后开灰度\n\n## 📎 产物\n\n- 需求清单 v3\n- 迁移脚本 runbook\n- 评审纪要 10-11",
"think_stripped": true
}
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
+27
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
{
"task": "to-09",
"family": "task-overview",
"arm": "B",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "handover",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 1477,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 445,
"completion_tokens": 1032,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 128
}
},
"latency_s": 10.37
}
],
"callCount": 1,
"markdown": "# 交接页 · 交付门禁自动化\n\n## 1. 任务背景\n- 任务代号:`eval/to-08`(交付门禁自动化)\n- 目标(来自任务名与产物推断,分析):建立自动化的交付门禁,覆盖需求冻结 → 契约定义 → 存储迁移 → 灰度开关 → 回退演练 五个环节。\n- 已沉淀产物:\n - 需求清单 v3(doc)\n - 迁移脚本 runbook(doc)\n - 评审纪要 10-11(doc)\n\n## 2. 当前状态(步骤面板)\n\n| 步骤 | 状态 | 备注(来自 log) |\n|---|---|---|\n| 需求冻结 | done | — |\n| 契约定义 | done | 10-11 评审通过,有两处字段口径修订 |\n| 存储迁移 | in_progress | 10-08 预发跑通,耗时 14m |\n| 灰度开关 | pending | 10-09 等待安全评审排期 |\n| 回退演练 | pending | 10-10 草案已提交,缺少数据校验步骤 |\n\n## 3. 接手事项(建议优先序)\n\n> 以下\"建议\"为基于材料事实的判断,仅作交接排序参考。\n\n1. **【高】灰度开关**:跟进安全评审排期(10-09 现状:pending 且在等外部排期),这是当前唯一被外部依赖卡住的环节。\n2. **【高】回退演练**:补齐\"数据校验步骤\"(10-10 log 明确点出的缺口),补完后即可推进演练。\n3. **【中】存储迁移**:脚本已在预发跑通(10-08,14m),需确认是否需要走生产验证或闭环为 done。\n4. **【低】契约定义**:已 done,关注 10-11 评审中两处字段口径修订的下游落地即可。\n\n## 4. 接手人建议先读\n1. 需求清单 v3 —— 了解整体范围与口径。\n2. 评审纪要 10-11 —— 了解契约定义最新修订,避免后续脚本/演练遗漏。\n3. 迁移脚本 runbook —— 存储迁移与灰度开关都会涉及执行细节。\n\n## 5. 已知风险与开口项\n- **风险(分析)**:灰度开关完全依赖安全评审排期,排期时间未定,存在阻塞。\n- **风险(分析)**:回退演练的\"数据校验步骤\"具体怎么补、标准是什么,材料未给出,需新同事对齐。\n- **开口项**:存储迁移 in_progress 状态是否仍需保留(例如等待生产环境验证结论),材料未说明,建议确认。",
"ok": true,
"wall_s": 10.4,
"raw_markdown": "<think>The user wants me to organize the task information into a handover page so new colleagues can understand the background, current status, and items to take over. I need to use only facts from the materials and mark my analysis/judgments verbally. The output should be a Markdown card directly without extra explanation.\n\nLet me structure the handover page:\n1. Background (from task name and artifacts)\n2. Current status (from steps)\n3. Recent dynamics (from log)\n4. Handover items - things the new colleague needs to pick up\n5. Available artifacts\n\nLet me draft this carefully, sticking strictly to the facts provided.\n\nKey facts:\n- Task name: 交付门禁自动化\n- Steps status:\n - 需求冻结: done\n - 契约定义: done\n - 存储迁移: in_progress\n - 灰度开关: pending\n - 回退演练: pending\n- Recent log:\n - 10-08 09:12 存储迁移脚本在预发跑通,耗时 14m\n - 10-09 15:40 灰度开关等待安全评审排期\n - 10-10 11:05 回退演练草案提交,缺少数据校验步骤\n - 10-11 10:30 契约定义评审通过,两处字段口径修订\n- Artifacts:\n - 需求清单 v3(doc)\n - 迁移脚本 runbook(doc)\n - 评审纪要 10-11(doc)\n\nAnalysis I'll include (must label as 分析/我的判断):\n- The 存储迁移 is in_progress but the script has run successfully in pre-prod, so this is somewhat between in_progress and almost done\n- 灰度开关 is blocked by 安全评审排期 - this is a blocker\n- 回退演练 needs a missing data validation step added\n\nHandover items I can derive:\n1. 灰度开关: 跟进安全评审排期\n2. 回退演练: 补充数据校验步骤\n3. 存储迁移: 虽然预发跑通但仍标记 in_progress,需要确认后续动作\n4. 契约定义: 跟进两处字段口径修订后的落地\n\nLet me structure this as a clean Markdown card.</think>\n\n# 交接页 · 交付门禁自动化\n\n## 1. 任务背景\n- 任务代号:`eval/to-08`(交付门禁自动化)\n- 目标(来自任务名与产物推断,分析):建立自动化的交付门禁,覆盖需求冻结 → 契约定义 → 存储迁移 → 灰度开关 → 回退演练 五个环节。\n- 已沉淀产物:\n - 需求清单 v3(doc)\n - 迁移脚本 runbook(doc)\n - 评审纪要 10-11(doc)\n\n## 2. 当前状态(步骤面板)\n\n| 步骤 | 状态 | 备注(来自 log) |\n|---|---|---|\n| 需求冻结 | done | — |\n| 契约定义 | done | 10-11 评审通过,有两处字段口径修订 |\n| 存储迁移 | in_progress | 10-08 预发跑通,耗时 14m |\n| 灰度开关 | pending | 10-09 等待安全评审排期 |\n| 回退演练 | pending | 10-10 草案已提交,缺少数据校验步骤 |\n\n## 3. 接手事项(建议优先序)\n\n> 以下\"建议\"为基于材料事实的判断,仅作交接排序参考。\n\n1. **【高】灰度开关**:跟进安全评审排期(10-09 现状:pending 且在等外部排期),这是当前唯一被外部依赖卡住的环节。\n2. **【高】回退演练**:补齐\"数据校验步骤\"(10-10 log 明确点出的缺口),补完后即可推进演练。\n3. **【中】存储迁移**:脚本已在预发跑通(10-08,14m),需确认是否需要走生产验证或闭环为 done。\n4. **【低】契约定义**:已 done,关注 10-11 评审中两处字段口径修订的下游落地即可。\n\n## 4. 接手人建议先读\n1. 需求清单 v3 —— 了解整体范围与口径。\n2. 评审纪要 10-11 —— 了解契约定义最新修订,避免后续脚本/演练遗漏。\n3. 迁移脚本 runbook —— 存储迁移与灰度开关都会涉及执行细节。\n\n## 5. 已知风险与开口项\n- **风险(分析)**:灰度开关完全依赖安全评审排期,排期时间未定,存在阻塞。\n- **风险(分析)**:回退演练的\"数据校验步骤\"具体怎么补、标准是什么,材料未给出,需新同事对齐。\n- **开口项**:存储迁移 in_progress 状态是否仍需保留(例如等待生产环境验证结论),材料未说明,建议确认。",
"think_stripped": true
}
+30
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
{
"task": "to-10",
"family": "task-overview",
"arm": "B",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "progress",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 1108,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 440,
"completion_tokens": 668,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"reasoning_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 128
}
},
"latency_s": 8.4
}
],
"callCount": 1,
"markdown": "## 📦 任务进度:交付门禁自动化\n\n**整体进度:3/5 完成**\n\n| 步骤 | 状态 |\n|---|---|\n| 需求冻结 | ✅ done |\n| 契约定义 | ✅ done |\n| 存储迁移 | 🔵 in_progress |\n| 灰度开关 | ⏳ pending |\n| 回退演练 | ⏳ pending |\n\n### 🔵 当前:存储迁移\n- 迁移脚本已在预发跑通(10-08,耗时 14m)\n- 状态仍标 in_progress,分析:预发通过不等于生产落地,可能还需正式上线与结果确认\n\n### ⏳ 后续待办\n1. **存储迁移收尾** → 推进正式环境迁移并确认结果\n2. **灰度开关** → 当前阻塞于安全评审排期(10-09),需推动评审排期\n3. **回退演练** → 草案已提交(10-10),但**缺少数据校验步骤**,需补齐后进入演练\n\n### 📎 已交付产物\n- 需求清单 v3\n- 迁移脚本 runbook\n- 评审纪要 10-11(契约评审通过,含两处字段口径修订)\n\n---\n**分析建议**:当前最关键的两个动作为①推动灰度开关安全评审排期,避免后续阻塞;②补全回退演练的数据校验步骤,否则演练无法闭环。",
"ok": true,
"wall_s": 8.4,
"raw_markdown": "<think>The user wants a quick view of where the task stands and what the next step is. I need to create a Markdown card summarizing the status.\n\nLet me analyze the materials:\n- Task: 交付门禁自动化 (Delivery Gate Automation)\n- Steps status:\n - 需求冻结: done\n - 契约定义: done\n - 存储迁移: in_progress\n - 灰度开关: pending\n - 回退演练: pending\n\nRecent dynamics:\n- 10-08: 迁移脚本在预发跑通,耗时 14m\n- 10-09: 灰度开关等待安全评审排期\n- 10-10: 回退演练草案提交,缺少数据校验步骤\n- 10-11: 契约定义评审通过,两处字段口径修订\n\nArtifacts:\n- 需求清单 v3\n- 迁移脚本 runbook\n- 评审纪要 10-11\n\nCurrent position: 存储迁移 is in progress (already verified in pre-release, but not yet fully done? Or is it waiting for something?)\n- The script ran successfully in pre-release, so the migration technical work seems done. But status says \"in_progress\".\n\nNext step: This needs analysis. Looking at the sequence:\n1. 存储迁移 in_progress - the script passed in pre-prod, so likely needs production rollout or final sign-off\n2. 灰度开关 pending - waiting for security review scheduling\n3. 回退演练 pending - draft submitted but missing data validation step\n\nSo the immediate next steps should be:\n1. Complete/finalize 存储迁移 (it seems to be in progress with the script validated)\n2. Schedule security review for 灰度开关 (it's blocked)\n3. Add data validation steps to 回退演练 draft\n\nLet me structure the card.</think>\n\n## 📦 任务进度:交付门禁自动化\n\n**整体进度:3/5 完成**\n\n| 步骤 | 状态 |\n|---|---|\n| 需求冻结 | ✅ done |\n| 契约定义 | ✅ done |\n| 存储迁移 | 🔵 in_progress |\n| 灰度开关 | ⏳ pending |\n| 回退演练 | ⏳ pending |\n\n### 🔵 当前:存储迁移\n- 迁移脚本已在预发跑通(10-08,耗时 14m)\n- 状态仍标 in_progress,分析:预发通过不等于生产落地,可能还需正式上线与结果确认\n\n### ⏳ 后续待办\n1. **存储迁移收尾** → 推进正式环境迁移并确认结果\n2. **灰度开关** → 当前阻塞于安全评审排期(10-09),需推动评审排期\n3. **回退演练** → 草案已提交(10-10),但**缺少数据校验步骤**,需补齐后进入演练\n\n### 📎 已交付产物\n- 需求清单 v3\n- 迁移脚本 runbook\n- 评审纪要 10-11(契约评审通过,含两处字段口径修订)\n\n---\n**分析建议**:当前最关键的两个动作为①推动灰度开关安全评审排期,避免后续阻塞;②补全回退演练的数据校验步骤,否则演练无法闭环。",
"think_stripped": true
}
+56
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
{
"task": "rc-01",
"family": "research-compare",
"arm": "G-hs",
"model": "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed",
"goalKind": "compare",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 1966,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 935,
"completion_tokens": 1031
},
"latency_s": 17.98
},
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 2734,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 987,
"completion_tokens": 1747,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 891
}
},
"latency_s": 26.42
}
],
"callCount": 2,
"raw_first": "{\"title\":\"供应商选型对比\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"source\":[[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1\"],[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2\"],[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3\"]],\"compare\":{\"right\":{\"tone\":\"info\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"source\":[[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1\"]],\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"报价\",\"¥15/人/天\"],[\"部署形态\",\"国密支持(私有化)\"],[\"上线时间\",\"2022-08\"],[\"近半年发布\",\"7次\"],[\"修复周期\",\"平均3天\"]]}},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"source\":[[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2\"]],\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"报价\",\"¥5/人/天\"],[\"部署形态\",\"仅SaaS\"],[\"上线时间\",\"2019-03\"],[\"近半年发布\",\"2次\"],[\"修复周期\",\"平均1天\"]]}},{\"id\":\"n1c\",\"source\":[[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3\"]],\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"报价\",\"¥12/人/天\"],[\"部署形态\",\"私有化可选\"],[\"上线时间\",\"2021-11\"],[\"近半年发布\",\"7次\"],[\"修复周期\",\"平均4天\"]]}}]},\"left\":{\"title\":\"核心能力\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"source\":[[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1\"]],\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"VaultKeep\",\"权限中枢\"],[\"RBAC\",\"支持细粒度角色控制\"],[\"临时令牌\",\"限时授权管理\"],[\"密钥轮换\",\"自动密钥更新\"]]}},{\"id\":\"n2b\",\"source\":[[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2\"]],\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"LarkPipe\",\"消息管道\"],[\"Webhook路由\",\"灵活事件分发\"],[\"重试策略\",\"可配置失败重试\"],[\"模板变量\",\"动态消息组装\"]]}},{\"id\":\"n2c\",\"source\":[[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3\"]],\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"NexusGrid\",\"数据表格\"],[\"虚拟滚动\",\"大数据量渲染优化\"],[\"单元格校验\",\"数据质量保障\"],[\"导出Excel\",\"原生支持\"]]}}]}}},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"source\":[[\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"]],\"tree\":{\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"label\":\"风险提示\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a1\",\"badge\":\"中\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"label\":\"供应商锁定\",\"count\":\"私有API占比40%\"},{\"id\":\"n3a2\",\"badge\":\"低\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"label\":\"培训成本\",\"count\":\"界面术语不一致\"},{\"id\":\"n3a3\",\"badge\":\"中\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"label\":\"升级断层\",\"count\":\"近两季度仅小版本\"}]}]}},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"markdown\":\"## 选型建议\\n\\n**推荐优先级:VaultKeep > NexusGrid > LarkPipe**\\n\\n### 理由\\n\\n1. **安全合规优先**:VaultKeep 是唯一支持国密且提供私有化部署的方案,满足数据主权要求,适合金融/政务场景。\\n2. **综合性价比**:NexusGrid 在价格与部署灵活性间取得平衡,私有化可选降低了锁定风险,7次发布频率表明积极维护。\\n3. **成本敏感可考虑 LarkPipe**:报价最低且修复速度快(1天),但仅 SaaS 形态存在数据安全与锁定风险,需评估业务场景容忍度。\\n\\n### 决策要点\\n- 若数据合规要求高 → 选 VaultKeep\\n- 若需平衡成本与灵活性 → 选 NexusGrid\\n- 若预算极度紧张且接受 SaaS → LarkPipe\"}]}",
"valid_first": false,
"errors_first": [
"$: 未知节点类型 None",
"$: 未知节点类型 None",
"$: 未知节点类型 None"
],
"stats_first": {
"nodes": 3,
"maxDepth": 1,
"types": [],
"refsUsed": [],
"unknownRefs": []
},
"raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"供应商选型对比报告\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"compare\":{\"left\":{\"title\":\"VaultKeep\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1\"],\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"类型\",\"权限中枢\"],[\"上线\",\"2022-08\"],[\"核心能力\",\"RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换\"],[\"报价\",\"¥15/人/天\"],[\"部署\",\"国密支持\"],[\"近半年发布\",\"7次\"],[\"修复周期\",\"3天\"]]}}]},\"right\":{\"title\":\"NexusGrid\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3\"],\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"类型\",\"数据表格\"],[\"上线\",\"2021-11\"],[\"核心能力\",\"虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出Excel\"],[\"报价\",\"¥12/人/天\"],[\"部署\",\"私有化可选\"],[\"近半年发布\",\"7次\"],[\"修复周期\",\"4天\"]]}}]}}},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"tabs\":{\"tabs\":[{\"id\":\"tab1\",\"label\":\"价格对比\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"chart-lite\":{\"chart\":{\"kind\":\"bar\",\"labels\":[\"VaultKeep\",\"LarkPipe\",\"NexusGrid\"],\"series\":[15,5,12]}}}]},{\"id\":\"tab2\",\"label\":\"综合对比\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2b\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3\"],\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"vendor\",\"label\":\"供应商\"},{\"key\":\"type\",\"label\":\"类型\"},{\"key\":\"price\",\"label\":\"日报价\"},{\"key\":\"deploy\",\"label\":\"部署\"},{\"key\":\"release\",\"label\":\"近半年发布\"},{\"key\":\"fix\",\"label\":\"修复周期\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"row1\",\"cells\":[[\"vendor\",\"VaultKeep\"],[\"type\",\"权限中枢\"],[\"price\",\"¥15\"],[\"deploy\",\"国密\"],[\"release\",\"7次\"],[\"fix\",\"3天\"]]},{\"id\":\"row2\",\"cells\":[[\"vendor\",\"LarkPipe\"],[\"type\",\"消息管道\"],[\"price\",\"¥5\"],[\"deploy\",\"仅SaaS\"],[\"release\",\"2次\"],[\"fix\",\"1天\"]]},{\"id\":\"row3\",\"cells\":[[\"vendor\",\"NexusGrid\"],[\"type\",\"数据表格\"],[\"price\",\"¥12\"],[\"deploy\",\"私有化可选\"],[\"release\",\"7次\"],[\"fix\",\"4天\"]]}]}}]}]}},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"],\"markdown\":\"## 风险评估\\n\\n| 风险项 | 等级 | 说明 |\\n|--------|------|------|\\n| 供应商锁定 | 中 | 私有API占比40% |\\n| 培训成本 | 低 | 界面术语与现有系统不一致 |\\n| 升级断层 | 中 | 近两季度仅小版本更新 |\"},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"markdown\":\"## 选型建议\\n\\n**推荐:NexusGrid**\\n\\n理由:\\n1. **部署灵活**:支持私有化部署,可规避供应商锁定风险\\n2. **价格适中**:¥12/人/天,介于两者之间\\n3. **活跃迭代**:近半年7次发布,功能持续完善\\n\\n**备选考虑**\\n- 若安全合规要求极高(如金融、政务),选 **VaultKeep**(国密支持)\\n- 若成本优先且接受SaaS限制,选 **LarkPipe**(最低价、修复最快)\"}]}",
"repaired": true,
"valid_final": false,
"errors_final": [
"$: 未知节点类型 None",
"$: 未知节点类型 None",
"$: 未知节点类型 None",
"$: 未知节点类型 None"
],
"spec": null,
"wall_s": 44.4
}
+58
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
{
"task": "rc-02",
"family": "research-compare",
"arm": "G-hs",
"model": "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed",
"goalKind": "risk",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 2254,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 936,
"completion_tokens": 1318,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 891
}
},
"latency_s": 18.79
},
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 2158,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 988,
"completion_tokens": 1170,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 891
}
},
"latency_s": 16.94
}
],
"callCount": 2,
"raw_first": "```json\n{\n \"title\": \"供应商风控评审报告\",\n \"nodes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n1\",\n \"source\": [\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"],\n \"tree\": {\n \"nodes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"risk-high\",\n \"label\": \"高风险\",\n \"tone\": \"danger\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"risk-lock\",\n \"label\": \"供应商锁定\",\n \"badge\": \"中\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"risk-lock-detail\",\n \"label\": \"私有 API 占比 40%,迁移成本高\",\n \"count\": \"40%\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"risk-medium\",\n \"label\": \"中风险\",\n \"tone\": \"warn\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"risk-upgrade\",\n \"label\": \"升级断层\",\n \"badge\": \"中\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"risk-upgrade-detail\",\n \"label\": \"近两季度仅小版本,功能迭代停滞\",\n \"count\": \"2 季度\"\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"risk-deploy\",\n \"label\": \"部署形态局限\",\n \"badge\": \"中\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"risk-deploy-detail\",\n \"label\": \"LarkPipe 仅 SaaS,数据主权受限\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"risk-low\",\n \"label\": \"低风险\",\n \"tone\": \"info\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"risk-train\",\n \"label\": \"培训成本\",\n \"badge\": \"低\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"risk-train-detail\",\n \"label\": \"界面术语与现有系统不一致,需适配\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n }\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n2\",\n \"source\": [\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\", \"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1\", \"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2\", \"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3\"],\n \"table\": {\n \"columns\": [\n {\"key\": \"risk\", \"label\": \"风险项\"},\n {\"key\": \"severity\", \"label\": \"严重度\"},\n {\"key\": \"source\", \"label\": \"来源\"},\n {\"key\": \"judgment\", \"label\": \"判断\"}\n ],\n \"rows\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"row-1\",\n \"cells\": [\n [\"risk\", \"供应商锁定(私有 API)\"],\n [\"severity\", \"中\"],\n [\"source\", \"尽调备忘\"],\n [\"judgment\", \"40% 私有 API 占比显著,建议合同中约定数据导出接口与迁移 SLA\"]\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"row-2\",\n \"cells\": [\n [\"risk\", \"升级断层\"],\n [\"severity\", \"中\"],\n [\"source\", \"尽调备忘\"],\n [\"judgment\", \"连续两季无大版本更新,需评估供应商研发投入可持续性\"]\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"row-3\",\n \"cells\": [\n [\"risk\", \"培训成本\"],\n [\"severity\", \"低\"],\n [\"source\", \"尽调备忘\"],\n [\"judgment\", \"术语不一致属常见问题,可通过内部培训文档缓解\"]\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"row-4\",\n \"cells\": [\n [\"risk\", \"SaaS 部署合规性\"],\n [\"severity\", \"中\"],\n [\"source\", \"LarkPipe 规格\"],\n [\"judgment\", \"仅 SaaS 形态可能不符合金融/政务行业数据本地化要求,建议优先选择私有化可选产品\"]\n ]\n }\n ]\n }\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n3\",\n \"markdown\": \"**风控建议**:当前三项中风险均来自内部尽调,其中供应商锁定与升级断层需在采购决策前与供应商明确协议条款;SaaS 部署合规性需结合业务所属行业法规进一步评估。\"\n }\n ]\n}\n```",
"valid_first": false,
"errors_first": [
"$: 未知节点类型 None",
"$: 未知节点类型 None",
"$: 未知节点类型 None"
],
"stats_first": {
"nodes": 3,
"maxDepth": 1,
"types": [],
"refsUsed": [],
"unknownRefs": []
},
"raw_repair": "```json\n{\n \"title\": \"风控评审:供应商风险分析\",\n \"nodes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n1\",\n \"source\": [\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"],\n \"section\": {\n \"title\": \"风险总览\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n1a\",\n \"tree\": {\n \"nodes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"risk1\",\n \"label\": \"供应商锁定\",\n \"tone\": \"warn\",\n \"badge\": \"中\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"risk1a\",\n \"label\": \"私有 API 占比 40%,替换成本高\"\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"risk2\",\n \"label\": \"升级断层\",\n \"tone\": \"warn\",\n \"badge\": \"中\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"risk2a\",\n \"label\": \"近两季度仅小版本,功能停滞风险\"\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"risk3\",\n \"label\": \"培训成本\",\n \"tone\": \"info\",\n \"badge\": \"低\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"risk3a\",\n \"label\": \"界面术语与现有系统不一致\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n }\n }\n ]\n }\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n2\",\n \"source\": [\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"],\n \"section\": {\n \"title\": \"风险详析\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n2a\",\n \"tabs\": {\n \"tabs\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"tab1\",\n \"label\": \"供应商锁定(中)\",\n \"nodes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n2a1\",\n \"markdown\": \"**来源**:`doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo`\\n\\n**现状**:私有 API 占比达 40%,对接深度绑定。\\n\\n**影响**:若供应商涨价或服务中断,迁移成本高、周期长。\\n\\n**建议**:\\n1. 要求提供 API 兼容层或标准化接口\\n2. 评估多供应商备份方案的可行性\\n3. 合同中明确数据迁移条款\"\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"tab2\",\n \"label\": \"升级断层(中)\",\n \"nodes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n2a2\",\n \"markdown\": \"**来源**:`doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo`\\n\\n**现状**:近两季度仅发布小版本,未见大版本迭代。\\n\\n**影响**:功能更新停滞,安全补丁可能延迟,长期看技术债务累积。\\n\\n**建议**:\\n1. 与供应商确认产品 roadmap\\n2. 评估竞品更新频率作为参考\\n3. 监控供应商财务健康度\"\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"tab3\",\n \"label\": \"培训成本(低)\",\n \"nodes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n2a3\",\n \"markdown\": \"**来源**:`doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo`\\n\\n**现状**:界面术语与现有系统不一致,新用户上手需要额外培训。\\n\\n**影响**:短期增加培训成本,长期可通过统一术语库缓解。\\n\\n**建议**:\\n1. 制作内部术语对照表\\n2. 上线前安排厂商培训\\n3. 预留 1-2 周适应期\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n }\n }\n ]\n }\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n3\",\n \"section\": {\n \"title\": \"综合判断\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n3a\",\n \"progress\": {\n \"label\": \"整体风险等级\",\n \"value\": 0.55\n }\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n3b\",\n \"markdown\": \"**结论**:本轮采购综合风险为**中等**。\\n\\n- 供应商锁定与升级断层两项中等风险需重点关注,建议在合同中增加 SLA 保障条款\\n- 培训成本为低风险,可通过内部培训消化\\n- 鉴于近半年发布频率尚可(7次),供应商技术投入未见明显停滞迹象,风险可控但需持续监控\"\n }\n ]\n }\n }\n ]\n}\n```",
"repaired": true,
"valid_final": false,
"errors_final": [
"$: 未知节点类型 None",
"$: 未知节点类型 None",
"$: 未知节点类型 None"
],
"spec": null,
"wall_s": 35.7
}
+56
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
{
"task": "rc-03",
"family": "research-compare",
"arm": "G-hs",
"model": "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed",
"goalKind": "order",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 2106,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 926,
"completion_tokens": 1180,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 891
}
},
"latency_s": 23.08
},
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 2621,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 978,
"completion_tokens": 1643,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 891
}
},
"latency_s": 27.23
}
],
"callCount": 2,
"raw_first": "{\"title\":\"实施路线图:分阶段部署计划\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3\",\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"],\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"第一阶段:基础设施层\",\"time\":\"Week 1-2\",\"markdown\":\"### 目标\\n部署消息管道作为统一集成中枢\\n\\n### 选型依据\\n- 报价最低(¥5/人/天),试错成本可控【doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2】\\n- 修复周期仅 1 天,运维压力最小【doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2】\\n- 2019 年上线,生产稳定性已验证【doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2】\\n\\n### 依赖\\n- 无前置依赖,可最先实施\\n\\n### 里程碑\\n✅ Webhook 路由联调完成\\n✅ 重试策略配置验收\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"title\":\"第二阶段:核心数据平台\",\"time\":\"Week 3-5\",\"markdown\":\"### 目标\\n上线数据表格能力,支撑业务数据化运营\\n\\n### 选型依据\\n- 虚拟滚动保障大数据量性能【doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3】\\n- 支持私有化部署,兼顾合规需求【doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3】\\n- 培训成本风险低(界面术语不一致)【doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo】\\n\\n### 依赖\\n- 第一阶段(LarkPipe)完成\\n\\n### 里程碑\\n✅ 单元格校验规则落地\\n✅ Excel 导出流程打通\",\"tone\":\"info\"},{\"title\":\"第三阶段:安全权限体系\",\"time\":\"Week 6-8\",\"markdown\":\"### 目标\\n构建统一权限中枢,治理供应商锁定风险\\n\\n### 选型依据\\n- RBAC 能力覆盖权限管理全场景【doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1】\\n- 支持国密,满足合规要求【doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1】\\n- 临时令牌机制降低长期密钥暴露风险【doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1】\\n\\n### 依赖\\n- 第一阶段(集成中枢就绪)\\n- 第二阶段(数据平台就绪)\\n\\n### 里程碑\\n✅ RBAC 角色体系上线\\n✅ 密钥轮换机制启用\\n\\n⚠️ 注意:供应商锁定风险中等(私有 API 占 40%),需同步制定 API 抽象层【doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo】\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"第四阶段:集成优化\",\"time\":\"Week 9-10\",\"markdown\":\"### 目标\\n跨系统联动,稳定发布流程\\n\\n### 选型依据\\n- 三套工具均已完成联调\\n- 近半年平均发布 7 次,工具链成熟度足够【doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1】【doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3】\\n\\n### 依赖\\n- 前三阶段全部完成\\n\\n### 里程碑\\n✅ 端到端流程串测\\n✅ 监控告警配置验收\\n\\n⚠️ 升级断层风险:近两季度仅小版本更新,需建立版本追踪机制【doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo】\"}]}},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"],\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"供应商锁定\",\"中\",\"需同步构建 API 抽象隔离层\"],[\"培训成本\",\"低\",\"提前准备术语对照文档\"],[\"升级断层\",\"中\",\"建立版本健康度监控\"]]}},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"markdown\":\"**总体成本估算(10人团队,10周)**\\n\\n| 供应商 | 单价 | 估算成本 |\\n|--------|------|----------|\\n| LarkPipe | ¥5/人/天 | ~¥3,500 |\\n| NexusGrid | ¥12/人/天 | ~¥8,400 |\\n| VaultKeep | ¥15/人/天 | ~¥10,500 |\\n| **合计** | - | **~¥22,400** |\\n\\n*注:实际成本受实际人天影响,建议按需调整*\"}]}",
"valid_first": false,
"errors_first": [
"$: 未知节点类型 None",
"$: 未知节点类型 None",
"$: 未知节点类型 None"
],
"stats_first": {
"nodes": 3,
"maxDepth": 1,
"types": [],
"refsUsed": [],
"unknownRefs": []
},
"raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"供应商评估与实施规划\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"风险评估\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"],\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"供应商锁定\",\"中(私有 API 占比 40%)\"],[\"升级断层\",\"中(近两季度仅小版本)\"],[\"培训成本\",\"低(界面术语不一致)\"]]},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"],\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**缓解建议**:优先引入私有化可选方案,降低锁定风险;提前开展界面适配培训。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"供应商概览\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"compare\",\"compare\":{\"left\":{\"title\":\"VaultKeep(权限中枢)\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2a1\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1\"],\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"上线时间\",\"2022-08\"],[\"核心能力\",\"RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换\"],[\"报价\",\"¥15/人/天\"],[\"部署\",\"国密支持\"],[\"维护\",\"7次发布/修复周期3天\"]]}]},{\"right\":{\"title\":\"LarkPipe(消息管道)\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2b1\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2\"],\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"上线时间\",\"2019-03\"],[\"核心能力\",\"Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量\"],[\"报价\",\"¥5/人/天\"],[\"部署\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"维护\",\"2次发布/修复周期1天\"]]}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n2c\",\"type\":\"compare\",\"compare\":{\"left\":{\"title\":\"NexusGrid(数据表格)\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2c1\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3\"],\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"上线时间\",\"2021-11\"],[\"核心能力\",\"虚拟滚动、单元格校验、导出 Excel\"],[\"报价\",\"¥12/人/天\"],[\"部署\",\"私有化可选\"],[\"维护\",\"7次发布/修复周期4天\"]]}]}}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"分阶段实施计划\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"],\"type\":\"steps\",\"steps\":{\"current\":0,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"阶段一:引入 NexusGrid(数据表格)\",\"status\":\"active\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"label\":\"阶段二:引入 LarkPipe(消息管道)\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"阶段三:引入 VaultKeep(权限中枢)\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"info\"},{\"label\":\"阶段四:集成联调与验收\",\"status\":\"pending\"}]}},{\"id\":\"n3b\",\"type\":\"tabs\",\"tabs\":{\"tabs\":[{\"id\":\"t1\",\"label\":\"阶段一详情\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"t1a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**目标**:建立数据展示与导出基础能力\\n\\n**前置条件**:评审通过\\n\\n**步骤**:1. 确认私有化部署需求;2. 完成数据源对接;3. 配置单元格校验规则;4. 上线 Excel 导出功能\\n\\n**里程碑**:上线后 2 周内完成数据迁移\\n\\n**风险**:升级断层(中),建议锁定大版本升级窗口\\n\\n**来源**:doc:eval/rc-01/vendor3、doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"}]},{\"id\":\"t2\",\"label\":\"阶段二详情\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"t2a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**目标**:建立标准化消息通道\\n\\n**前置条件**:阶段一完成\\n\\n**步骤**:1. 梳理 Webhook 路由规则;2. 配置重试策略;3. 定义模板变量规范;4. 灰度切换 20% 流量\\n\\n**里程碑**:灰度覆盖率 100%\\n\\n**风险**:SaaS 依赖,需评估数据合规要求\\n\\n**来源**:doc:eval/rc-01/vendor2\"}]},{\"id\":\"t3\",\"label\":\"阶段三详情\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"t3a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**目标**:建立统一权限管控\\n\\n**前置条件**:阶段二完成\\n\\n**步骤**:1. 规划 RBAC 角色体系;2. 接入国密认证;3. 配置密钥轮换策略;4. 部署临时令牌机制\\n\\n**里程碑**:全量切换权限控制\\n\\n**风险**:私有 API 锁定(中),建议同步建设 API 网关抽象层\\n\\n**来源**:doc:eval/rc-01/vendor1、doc:eval/rc-01/riskmemo\"}]},{\"id\":\"t4\",\"label\":\"阶段四详情\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"t4a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**目标**:端到端集成验证\\n\\n**前置条件**:前三阶段完成\\n\\n**步骤**:1. 数据权限联动测试;2. 消息链路监控验证;3. 性能压测;4. 用户验收测试(UAT)\\n\\n**里程碑**:正式投产\"}]}}]}]}]}",
"repaired": true,
"valid_final": false,
"errors_final": [
"JSON 解析失败: Expecting property name enclosed in double quotes: line 1 column 674 (char 673)"
],
"spec": null,
"wall_s": 50.3
}
+48
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
{
"task": "rc-07",
"family": "research-compare",
"arm": "G-hs",
"model": "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed",
"goalKind": "compare",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 1969,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 935,
"completion_tokens": 1034,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 443
}
},
"latency_s": 17.78
},
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 2106,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 984,
"completion_tokens": 1122,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 891
}
},
"latency_s": 18.18
}
],
"callCount": 2,
"raw_first": "{\"title\":\"供应商选型对比报告\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"],\"compare\":{\"left\":{\"title\":\"供应商横向对比\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"],\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"vendor\",\"label\":\"供应商\"},{\"key\":\"category\",\"label\":\"产品类别\"},{\"key\":\"price\",\"label\":\"报价\"},{\"key\":\"deployment\",\"label\":\"部署形态\"},{\"key\":\"releases\",\"label\":\"近半年发布\"},{\"key\":\"fixcycle\",\"label\":\"平均修复周期\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"r1\",\"cells\":[[\"vendor\",\"LarkPipe\"],[\"category\",\"消息管道\"],[\"price\",\"¥5/人/天\"],[\"deployment\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"releases\",\"7 次\"],[\"fixcycle\",\"2 天\"]]},{\"id\":\"r2\",\"cells\":[[\"vendor\",\"VaultKeep\"],[\"category\",\"权限中枢\"],[\"price\",\"¥15/人/天\"],[\"deployment\",\"国密支持\"],[\"releases\",\"4 次\"],[\"fixcycle\",\"4 天\"]]},{\"id\":\"r3\",\"cells\":[[\"vendor\",\"EchoDocs\"],[\"category\",\"文档协同\"],[\"price\",\"¥9/人/天\"],[\"deployment\",\"无离线\"],[\"releases\",\"2 次\"],[\"fixcycle\",\"1 天\"]]}]}}]}},\"right\":{\"title\":\"选型建议\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"markdown\":\"## 建议结论\\n\\n**综合推荐:EchoDocs**\\n\\n### 核心理由\\n\\n| 维度 | 分析 |\\n|------|------|\\n| **价格** | EchoDocs(¥9)介于两者之间,LarkPipe 最便宜但功能单一 |\\n| **稳定性** | EchoDocs 修复周期仅 1 天,响应最快 |\\n| **风险可控** | 文档协同非核心系统,锁定风险(40%)影响有限 |\\n\\n### 备选方案\\n\\n- **预算优先**:选 LarkPipe,但需接受功能局限性\\n- **安全合规优先**:选 VaultKeep,适合权限管理为核心的场景\\n\\n### 待确认事项\\n\\n- ⚠️ 性能未验证(高风险):建议在选型前要求供应商提供万行表格压测报告\\n- ⚠️ 培训成本(低风险):提前对比界面术语差异\\n\\n> 以上建议基于现有尽调材料,最终决策请结合业务实际需求。\"}]}}}},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"风险等级-高\", \"性能未验证(万行表格场景无官方基准)\"],[\"风险等级-中\", \"供应商锁定(私有 API 占比 40%)\"],[\"风险等级-低\", \"培训成本(界面术语与现有系统不一致)\"]]}}]}",
"valid_first": false,
"errors_first": [
"JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 1404 (char 1403)"
],
"stats_first": null,
"raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"供应商选型对比报告\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"],\"node\":{\"compare\":{\"left\":{\"title\":\"LarkPipe\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"node\":{\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"上线时间\",\"2019-03\"],[\"报价\",\"¥5/人/天\"],[\"部署形态\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"平均修复周期\",\"2 天\"]]}}},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"node\":{\"markdown\":{\"markdown\":\"**核心能力**:Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量\\n**近半年发布**:7 次\"}}]}},\"right\":{\"title\":\"VaultKeep\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"node\":{\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"上线时间\",\"2022-08\"],[\"报价\",\"¥15/人/天\"],[\"部署形态\",\"国密支持\"],[\"平均修复周期\",\"4 天\"]]}}},{\"id\":\"n2b\",\"node\":{\"markdown\":{\"markdown\":\"**核心能力**:RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换\\n**近半年发布**:4 次\"}}]}}}},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"node\":{\"section\":{\"title\":\"文档协同类工具\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"node\":{\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"上线时间\",\"2020-06\"],[\"报价\",\"¥9/人/天\"],[\"部署形态\",\"无离线\"],[\"平均修复周期\",\"1 天\"]]}}},{\"id\":\"n3b\",\"node\":{\"markdown\":{\"markdown\":\"**核心能力**:批注、版本链、全文检索\\n**近半年发布**:2 次\\n**供应商**:EchoDocs\"}}]}}]}},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"node\":{\"section\":{\"title\":\"风险备忘\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"node\":{\"tree\":{\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"r1\",\"label\":\"性能未验证\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"badge\":\"高\"},{\"id\":\"r2\",\"label\":\"培训成本\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"badge\":\"低\"},{\"id\":\"r3\",\"label\":\"供应商锁定\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"badge\":\"中\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"r3a\",\"label\":\"私有 API 占比 40%\"}]}]}}},{\"id\":\"n4b\",\"node\":{\"markdown\":{\"markdown\":\"> 注:万行表格场景无官方基准;界面术语与现有系统不一致\"}}]}}}},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"node\":{\"tabs\":{\"tabs\":[{\"id\":\"tab1\",\"label\":\"综合建议\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n5a\",\"node\":{\"markdown\":{\"markdown\":\"## 选型建议\\n\\n### 🥇 首选推荐:EchoDocs\\n\\n**理由**:\\n1. **稳定可靠**:平均修复周期仅 1 天,近半年 0 重大事故\\n2. **功能完整**:批注+版本链+全文检索覆盖核心文档协同需求\\n3. **性价比优**:¥9/人/天,处于三家中游\\n\\n### 🥈 备选方案:LarkPipe\\n\\n**适用场景**:若需与 Lark 生态深度集成\\n- 优势:发布频率高(7次/半年)、修复快\\n- 劣势:仅 SaaS 部署,供应商锁定风险较高\\n\\n### ⚠️ 暂不推荐:VaultKeep\\n\\n**原因**:\\n- 价格最高(¥15/人/天)\\n- 修复周期较长(4天)\\n- 若非强合规需求,可延后评估\\n\\n---\\n\\n### 行动建议\\n1. 对 EchoDocs 进行 POC 验证(重点:万行表格性能)\\n2. 确认私有 API 锁定解决方案\\n3. 安排 EchoDocs 与 VaultKeep 演示\"}}]},{\"id\":\"tab2\",\"label\":\"决策投票\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n5b\",\"node\":{\"progress\":{\"label\":\"EchoDocs 推荐度\",\"value\":0.75}},{\"id\":\"n5c\",\"node\":{\"progress\":{\"label\":\"LarkPipe 推荐度\",\"value\":0.5}},{\"id\":\"n5d\",\"node\":{\"progress\":{\"label\":\"VaultKeep 推荐度\",\"value\":0.3}}}]}]}}}},{\"id\":\"n6\",\"node\":{\"actions\":{\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"a1\",\"label\":\"通过 EchoDocs 进入 POC\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"a2\",\"label\":\"要求三家伙伴同台演示\",\"style\":\"default\"},{\"id\":\"a3\",\"label\":\"暂缓决策\",\"style\":\"danger\"}]}}}]}",
"repaired": true,
"valid_final": false,
"errors_final": [
"JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 394 (char 393)"
],
"spec": null,
"wall_s": 36.0
}
+52
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
{
"task": "rc-08",
"family": "research-compare",
"arm": "G-hs",
"model": "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed",
"goalKind": "risk",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 1951,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 936,
"completion_tokens": 1015,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 891
}
},
"latency_s": 15.92
},
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 1998,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 985,
"completion_tokens": 1013,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 891
}
},
"latency_s": 15.63
}
],
"callCount": 2,
"raw_first": "```json\n{\"title\":\"风控评审:供应商风险分析\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"node\":{\"section\":{\"title\":\"⚠️ 高风险\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"node\":{\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"风险项\",\"性能未验证\"],[\"严重度\",\"高\"],[\"具体描述\",\"万行表格场景无官方基准\"],[\"来源\",\"尽调风险备忘\"]]}}},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"node\":{\"markdown\":\"**分析判断**:高并发或大文档场景下缺乏性能基线数据,可能导致采购后出现瓶颈。建议要求供应商提供 P95/P99 响应时延报告,或约定 SLA 兜底条款。\"}}]}}},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"node\":{\"section\":{\"title\":\"⚡ 中风险\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"node\":{\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"风险项\",\"供应商锁定\"],[\"严重度\",\"中\"],[\"具体描述\",\"私有 API 占比 40%\"],[\"来源\",\"尽调风险备忘\"]]}}},{\"id\":\"n2b\",\"node\":{\"markdown\":\"**分析判断**:私有 API 占比偏高意味着迁移成本较大。建议在合同中明确数据导出格式、接口文档所有权,并约定退出时的技术交接流程。\"}}]}}},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"node\":{\"section\":{\"title\":\"🔔 低风险\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"node\":{\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"风险项\",\"培训成本\"],[\"严重度\",\"低\"],[\"具体描述\",\"界面术语与现有系统不一致\"],[\"来源\",\"尽调风险备忘\"]]}}},{\"id\":\"n3b\",\"node\":{\"markdown\":\"**分析判断**:术语差异属于可管理的适配问题。建议通过内部培训或定制 UI 标签即可缓解,对采购决策影响有限。\"}}]}}},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"node\":{\"section\":{\"title\":\"供应商横向对比\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"],\"node\":{\"compare\":{\"left\":{\"title\":\"LarkPipe\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"nodes\":[{\"node\":{\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"上线时间\",\"2019-03\"],[\"报价\",\"¥5/人/天\"],[\"部署\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"近半年发布\",\"7 次\"],[\"修复周期\",\"2 天\"]]}}]},\"right\":{\"title\":\"VaultKeep\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"nodes\":[{\"node\":{\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"上线时间\",\"2022-08\"],[\"报价\",\"¥15/人/天\"],[\"部署\",\"国密支持\"],[\"近半年发布\",\"4 次\"],[\"修复周期\",\"4 天\"]]}}]}}},{\"node\":{\"compare\":{\"left\":{\"title\":\"EchoDocs\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"nodes\":[{\"node\":{\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"上线时间\",\"2020-06\"],[\"报价\",\"¥9/人/天\"],[\"部署\",\"无离线\"],[\"近半年发布\",\"2 次\"],[\"修复周期\",\"1 天\"]]}}]}},\"right\":{\"title\":\"综合建议\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"nodes\":[{\"node\":{\"markdown\":\"- **安全敏感**:选 VaultKeep(国密+RBAC)\\n- **轻量集成**:选 LarkPipe(低价+高频迭代)\\n- **文档协作**:选 EchoDocs(修复最快)\\n- **共同前提**:需先解决性能验证问题\"}}]}}}}]}}]}\n```",
"valid_first": false,
"errors_first": [
"JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 1395 (char 1394)"
],
"stats_first": null,
"raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"供应商风险分析报告\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"s1\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"title\":\"高风险\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"风险项\",\"性能未验证\"],[\"严重度\",\"高\"],[\"说明\",\"万行表格场景无官方基准,实际使用时可能出现卡顿或超时问题\"],[\"建议\",\"要求供应商提供性能测试报告,或在 POC 阶段重点验证大数据量场景\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"s2\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"title\":\"中风险\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"风险项\",\"供应商锁定\"],[\"严重度\",\"中\"],[\"说明\",\"私有 API 占比 40%,迁移成本高\"],[\"建议\",\"合同中明确数据导出条款,评估二供替代方案可行性\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"s3\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"title\":\"低风险\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"风险项\",\"培训成本\"],[\"严重度\",\"低\"],[\"说明\",\"界面术语与现有系统不一致,用户初期需要适应\"],[\"建议\",\"上线前安排专项培训,准备术语对照表降低学习曲线\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"s4\",\"title\":\"供应商对比\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"t1\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"],\"type\":\"table\",\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"name\",\"label\":\"供应商\"},{\"key\":\"type\",\"label\":\"类型\"},{\"key\":\"price\",\"label\":\"报价(¥/人/天)\"},{\"key\":\"deploy\",\"label\":\"部署形态\"},{\"key\":\"release\",\"label\":\"近半年发布次数\"},{\"key\":\"fix\",\"label\":\"平均修复周期\"},{\"key\":\"strength\",\"label\":\"核心优势\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"v1\",\"cells\":[[\"name\",\"LarkPipe\"],[\"type\",\"消息管道\"],[\"price\",\"5\"],[\"deploy\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"release\",\"7 次\"],[\"fix\",\"2 天\"],[\"strength\",\"Webhook 路由、重试策略\"]]},{\"id\":\"v2\",\"cells\":[[\"name\",\"VaultKeep\"],[\"type\",\"权限中枢\"],[\"price\",\"15\"],[\"deploy\",\"国密支持\"],[\"release\",\"4 次\"],[\"fix\",\"4 天\"],[\"strength\",\"RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换\"]]},{\"id\":\"v3\",\"cells\":[[\"name\",\"EchoDocs\"],[\"type\",\"文档协同\"],[\"price\",\"9\"],[\"deploy\",\"无离线\"],[\"release\",\"2 次\"],[\"fix\",\"1 天\"],[\"strength\",\"批注、版本链、全文检索\"]]}]}}]},{\"id\":\"s5\",\"title\":\"综合判断\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"m1\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**风险汇总结论:**\\n\\n三个供应商各有优劣:\\n\\n- **LarkPipe** 价格最低、响应最快,但仅有 SaaS 形态且性能未验证,建议在确认大表场景可行后再推进。\\n- **VaultKeep** 安全能力最强(国密支持),适合高安全要求场景,但单价最高且修复周期偏长,需评估预算。\\n- **EchoDocs** 文档能力突出,稳定性好(修复周期最短),但无离线能力,如需断网使用需额外规划。\\n\\n建议根据业务场景优先级选择:安全优先→ VaultKeep;成本优先且 POC 通过→ LarkPipe;文档协同核心需求→ EchoDocs。\"}]}]}",
"repaired": true,
"valid_final": false,
"errors_final": [
"$: 未知节点类型 None",
"$: 未知节点类型 None",
"$: 未知节点类型 None",
"$: 未知节点类型 None",
"$: 未知节点类型 None"
],
"spec": null,
"wall_s": 31.5
}
+48
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
{
"task": "rc-09",
"family": "research-compare",
"arm": "G-hs",
"model": "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed",
"goalKind": "order",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 2182,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 926,
"completion_tokens": 1256,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 891
}
},
"latency_s": 18.57
},
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 2246,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 975,
"completion_tokens": 1271,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 891
}
},
"latency_s": 21.91
}
],
"callCount": 2,
"raw_first": "{\"title\":\"实施规划\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"tabs1\",\"type\":\"tabs\",\"tabs\":{\"tabs\":[{\"id\":\"roadmap\",\"label\":\"实施路线图\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"steps1\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"steps\":{\"current\":0,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"第一阶段:EchoDocs 文档协同\",\"status\":\"active\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"]},{\"label\":\"第二阶段:LarkPipe 消息管道\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\"]},{\"label\":\"第三阶段:VaultKeep 权限中枢\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\"]}]}},{\"id\":\"sec1\",\"title\":\"分阶段说明\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**第一阶段(EchoDocs)**\\n- 上线时间:最早\\n- 原因:平均修复周期最短(1天),培训成本低(源:doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3、doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo)\\n- 里程碑:文档协同上线完成\\n\\n**第二阶段(LarkPipe)**\\n- 前置依赖:第一阶段完成\\n- 原因:发布频率最高(7次/半年),修复快速(2天),¥5/人/天性价比较好(源:doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1)\\n- 里程碑:Webhook 路由与重试策略上线\\n\\n**第三阶段(VaultKeep)**\\n- 前置依赖:前两阶段完成\\n- 原因:¥15/人/天成本最高,RBAC 与密钥轮换涉及核心安全,需后置验证(源:doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2)\\n- 里程碑:权限中枢全量切换\"}]}]},{\"id\":\"risk\",\"label\":\"风险提示\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"kv1\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"性能未验证(高)\",\"万行表格场景无官方基准\",\"source: doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],[\"供应商锁定(中)\",\"私有 API 占比 40%\",\"source: doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],[\"培训成本(低)\",\"界面术语与现有系统不一致\",\"source: doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"]]}]}]}]}}",
"valid_first": false,
"errors_first": [
"JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 1148 (char 1147)"
],
"stats_first": null,
"raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"供应商工具实施规划评审\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"nodeType\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**背景摘要**:本次规划覆盖 3 款工具,LarkPipe(消息管道)、VaultKeep(权限中枢)、EchoDocs(文档协同),需制定分阶段实施顺序与里程碑。\\n\\n**整体策略**:优先低风险/高频协同工具,再引入权限基础设施,最后扩展消息管道能力。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"],\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"nodeType\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"LarkPipe\",\"¥5/人/天 · SaaS · 2019-03 上线 · 修复周期 2 天 · 风险:供应商锁定 40%\"],[\"VaultKeep\",\"¥15/人/天 · 国密支持 · 2022-08 上线 · 修复周期 4 天 · 风险:培训成本(术语不一致)\"],[\"EchoDocs\",\"¥9/人/天 · 无离线 · 2020-06 上线 · 修复周期 1 天 · 风险:性能未验证(万行表格)\"],[\"锁定风险\",\"中:私有 API 占 40%(LarkPipe)\"],[\"培训成本\",\"低:术语与现有系统不一致(VaultKeep)\"],[\"性能风险\",\"高:万行表格无官方基准(EchoDocs)\"]]},{\"id\":\"n2b\",\"nodeType\":\"compare\",\"compare\":{\"left\":{\"title\":\"LarkPipe\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2b1\",\"nodeType\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"上线时间\",\"2019-03(成熟)\"],[\"日均成本\",\"¥5/人/天\"],[\"部署\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"修复周期\",\"2 天(快)\"],[\"风险\",\"供应商锁定 40%\"]]},{\"id\":\"n2b2\",\"nodeType\":\"progress\",\"progress\":{\"label\":\"供应商锁定风险\",\"value\":0.4}}]},\"right\":{\"title\":\"EchoDocs\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2b3\",\"nodeType\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"上线时间\",\"2020-06(成熟)\"],[\"日均成本\",\"¥9/人/天\"],[\"部署\",\"无离线\"],[\"修复周期\",\"1 天(最快)\"],[\"风险\",\"性能未验证(高)万行场景\"]]},{\"id\":\"n2b4\",\"nodeType\":\"progress\",\"progress\":{\"label\":\"性能风险\",\"value\":0.7}}]}}}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"],\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"nodeType\":\"timeline\",\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"阶段一:EchoDocs(文档协同)\",\"time\":\"优先引入\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"markdown\":\"- **核心价值**:批注 + 版本链 + 全文检索,直接提升协作效率\\n- **里程碑**:全团队上线批注与版本管理\\n- **风险对冲**:性能未验证(高),建议先以 <500 行文档试点,再扩展\",\".ref\":\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"},{\"title\":\"阶段二:VaultKeep(权限中枢)\",\"time\":\"第二阶段\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"markdown\":\"- **核心价值**:RBAC + 临时令牌 + 国密支持,补全安全基础设施\\n- **里程碑**:与现有 SSO 对接,完成角色权限配置\\n- **依赖**:阶段一完成后方可与 EchoDocs 打通权限\",\".ref\":\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\"},{\"title\":\"阶段三:LarkPipe(消息管道)\",\"time\":\"第三阶段\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"markdown\":\"- **核心价值**:Webhook 路由 + 重试策略 + 模板变量\\n- **里程碑**:实现 EchoDocs → VaultKeep 事件联动\\n- **风险**:私有 API 占 40%,需提前锁定接口规范\",\".ref\":\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"nodeType\":\"tabs\",\"tabs\":[{\"id\":\"t1\",\"label\":\"风险缓解措施\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n4a1\",\"nodeType\":\"list\",\"items\":[\"**性能未验证(高)**:万行表格场景无官方基准 → 阶段一先小范围试点 500 行文档,验收通过再全量\"]},{\"id\":\"n4a2\",\"nodeType\":\"list\",\"items\":[\"**培训成本(低)**:术语不一致 → 制定迁移手册,优先培训关键用户\"]},{\"id\":\"n4a3\",\"nodeType\":\"list\",\"items\":[\"**供应商锁定(中)**:私有 API 40% → 阶段三前与 LarkPipe 确认接口稳定性,签 SLA\"]}]}]}]}]}",
"repaired": true,
"valid_final": false,
"errors_final": [
"JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 1318 (char 1317)"
],
"spec": null,
"wall_s": 40.5
}
+61
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
{
"task": "ri-01",
"family": "requirement-input",
"arm": "G-hs",
"model": "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed",
"goalKind": "collect",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 1358,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 815,
"completion_tokens": 543,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 443
}
},
"latency_s": 9.01
},
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 2097,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 874,
"completion_tokens": 1223,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 443
}
},
"latency_s": 21.7
}
],
"callCount": 2,
"raw_first": "{\"title\":\"待决问题收集\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"待决问题清单\",\"type\":\"form\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-00/open\"],\"form\":{\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"onsite\",\"label\":\"供应商是否要求驻场实施?\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"是\",\"否\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"影响实施成本与排期\"},{\"key\":\"concurrency\",\"label\":\"并发审批上限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"50\",\"200\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"影响系统容量规划\"},{\"key\":\"cross_quarter\",\"label\":\"旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度?\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"允许\",\"不允许\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"若不允许则Q1上线压力较大\"},{\"key\":\"approval_sign\",\"label\":\"验收标准由谁签署?\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"财务\",\"行政\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"明确验收责任归属\"}]}}]}",
"valid_first": false,
"errors_first": [
"$: 类型 form 不允许字段 ['form']",
"$: 非法 id '待决问题清单'",
"$: form.fields 必须为非空数组"
],
"stats_first": {
"nodes": 1,
"maxDepth": 1,
"types": [
"form"
],
"refsUsed": [
"req:eval/ri-00/open"
],
"unknownRefs": []
},
"raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"待决问题收集\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-00/open\"],\"type\":\"form\",\"form\":{\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"vendor_onsite\",\"label\":\"供应商是否要求驻场实施?\",\"type\":\"boolean\",\"required\":true,\"help\":\"影响实施成本与排期\"},{\"key\":\"concurrency_limit\",\"label\":\"并发审批上限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"50\",\"200\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"影响系统容量规划与预算\"},{\"key\":\"shutdown_window\",\"label\":\"旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度?\",\"type\":\"boolean\",\"required\":true,\"help\":\"若不允许,Q1 上线压力较大\"},{\"key\":\"acceptance_signer\",\"label\":\"验收标准由谁签署\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"财务\",\"行政\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"明确最终审批权责\"}]}},{\"id\":\"a1\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"submit\",\"label\":\"提交\",\"style\":\"primary\"}]}]}",
"repaired": true,
"valid_final": false,
"errors_final": [
"$: 类型 form 不允许字段 ['form']",
"$: form.fields 必须为非空数组"
],
"spec": null,
"wall_s": 30.7
}
+177
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,177 @@
{
"task": "ri-02",
"family": "requirement-input",
"arm": "G-hs",
"model": "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed",
"goalKind": "confirm",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 1503,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 812,
"completion_tokens": 691,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 443
}
},
"latency_s": 10.06
},
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 1928,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 864,
"completion_tokens": 1064,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 443
}
},
"latency_s": 15.16
}
],
"callCount": 2,
"raw_first": "```json\n{\n \"title\": \"审批系统合并项目范围确认\",\n \"nodes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n1\",\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"],\n \"section\": {\n \"title\": \"项目背景\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n1a\",\n \"kv\": {\n \"kv\": [\n [\"核心目标\", \"内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套\"],\n [\"预算上限\", \"40 万元\"],\n [\"上线时间\", \"Q1\"],\n [\"干系人\", \"财务(审批人)、行政(发起人)、IT(运维)、法务(事后复核)\"]\n ]\n }\n }\n ]\n }\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n2\",\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"],\n \"compare\": {\n \"left\": {\n \"title\": \"✅ 已定约束\",\n \"tone\": \"ok\",\n \"nodes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n2a\",\n \"kv\": {\n \"kv\": [\n [\"移动端入口\", \"保留\"],\n [\"审批链层级\", \"最多 5 级\"],\n [\"历史数据\", \"只读归档\"]\n ]\n }\n }\n ]\n },\n \"right\": {\n \"title\": \"❓ 待决事项\",\n \"tone\": \"warn\",\n \"nodes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n2b\",\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-01/open\"],\n \"list\": {\n \"items\": [\n \"旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度?\",\n \"并发审批上限:50 还是 200?\",\n \"归档年限:3 年还是 5 年?\",\n \"供应商是否要求驻场实施?\"\n ]\n }\n }\n ]\n }\n }\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n3\",\n \"markdown\": \"**请逐项确认后推进实施计划。**\"\n }\n ]\n}\n```",
"valid_first": false,
"errors_first": [
"$: 未知节点类型 None",
"$: 未知节点类型 None",
"$: 未知节点类型 None"
],
"stats_first": {
"nodes": 3,
"maxDepth": 1,
"types": [],
"refsUsed": [],
"unknownRefs": []
},
"raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"审批系统合并项目 - 范围确认页\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"s1\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"],\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"已定约束\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"kv1\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"],\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"项目背景\",\"内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套\"],[\"预算上限\",\"40 万元\"],[\"上线时间\",\"Q1 上线\"],[\"移动端入口\",\"保留\"],[\"审批链层级\",\"最多 5 级\"],[\"历史数据处理\",\"只读归档(不可编辑)\"]]},{\"id\":\"kv2\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"],\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"财务\",\"审批人\"],[\"行政\",\"发起人\"],[\"IT\",\"运维\"],[\"法务\",\"事后复核合同\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"s2\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-01/open\"],\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"待决事项(请逐项确认)\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"list1\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-01/open\"],\"type\":\"list\",\"items\":[\"旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度?\",\"并发审批上限:50 还是 200?\",\"归档年限:3 年还是 5 年?\",\"供应商是否要求驻场实施?\"]},{\"id\":\"act1\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"confirm\",\"label\":\"确认范围\",\"style\":\"primary\"}]}]}]}",
"repaired": true,
"valid_final": true,
"errors_final": [],
"spec": {
"title": "审批系统合并项目 - 范围确认页",
"nodes": [
{
"id": "s1",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-01/context"
],
"type": "section",
"title": "已定约束",
"children": [
{
"id": "kv1",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-01/context"
],
"type": "kv",
"kv": [
[
"项目背景",
"内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套"
],
[
"预算上限",
"40 万元"
],
[
"上线时间",
"Q1 上线"
],
[
"移动端入口",
"保留"
],
[
"审批链层级",
"最多 5 级"
],
[
"历史数据处理",
"只读归档(不可编辑)"
]
]
},
{
"id": "kv2",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-01/context"
],
"type": "kv",
"kv": [
[
"财务",
"审批人"
],
[
"行政",
"发起人"
],
[
"IT",
"运维"
],
[
"法务",
"事后复核合同"
]
]
}
]
},
{
"id": "s2",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-01/open"
],
"type": "section",
"title": "待决事项(请逐项确认)",
"children": [
{
"id": "list1",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-01/open"
],
"type": "list",
"items": [
"旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度?",
"并发审批上限:50 还是 200?",
"归档年限:3 年还是 5 年?",
"供应商是否要求驻场实施?"
]
},
{
"id": "act1",
"type": "actions",
"actions": [
{
"id": "confirm",
"label": "确认范围",
"style": "primary"
}
]
}
]
}
]
},
"stats_final": {
"nodes": 6,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"section",
"kv",
"kv",
"section",
"list",
"actions"
],
"refsUsed": [
"req:eval/ri-01/context",
"req:eval/ri-01/open"
],
"idsProvided": 6
},
"wall_s": 25.2
}
+58
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
{
"task": "ri-03",
"family": "requirement-input",
"arm": "G-hs",
"model": "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed",
"goalKind": "collect",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 1954,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 817,
"completion_tokens": 1137,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 443
}
},
"latency_s": 16.12
},
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 2122,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 860,
"completion_tokens": 1262,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 443
}
},
"latency_s": 16.73
}
],
"callCount": 2,
"raw_first": "{\"title\":\"审批系统合并项目 - 待决问题收集\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-02/context\"],\"markdown\":\"## 项目背景\\n\\n将内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套,目标 **Q1 上线**,预算上限 **40 万元**。\\n\\n**干系人**:财务(审批人)、行政(发起人)、IT(运维)、法务(事后复核)\\n\\n**已定约束**:保留移动端入口;审批链最多 5 级;历史数据只读归档。\"},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-02/open\"],\"form\":{\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"approval_signer\",\"label\":\"验收标准签署人\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[{\"value\":\"finance\",\"label\":\"财务\"},{\"value\":\"admin\",\"label\":\"行政\"}],\"required\":true,\"placeholder\":\"请选择签署方\",\"help\":\"由谁最终签署确认验收标准\"},{\"key\":\"concurrent_limit\",\"label\":\"并发审批上限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[{\"value\":\"50\",\"label\":\"50 并发\"},{\"value\":\"200\",\"label\":\"200 并发\"}],\"required\":true,\"placeholder\":\"请选择并发上限\",\"help\":\"系统需支持的并发审批数量峰值\"},{\"key\":\"vendor_onsite\",\"label\":\"供应商是否要求驻场实施\",\"type\":\"boolean\",\"required\":true,\"help\":\"驻场实施可能影响项目周期与成本\"},{\"key\":\"retention_period\",\"label\":\"归档年限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[{\"value\":\"3\",\"label\":\"3 年\"},{\"value\":\"5\",\"label\":\"5 年\"}],\"required\":true,\"placeholder\":\"请选择归档年限\",\"help\":\"历史审批数据只读归档的保留期限\"}]}}]}",
"valid_first": false,
"errors_first": [
"$: 未知节点类型 None",
"$: 未知节点类型 None"
],
"stats_first": {
"nodes": 2,
"maxDepth": 1,
"types": [],
"refsUsed": [],
"unknownRefs": []
},
"raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"审批系统合并项目 - 待决问题收集\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-02/context\"],\"markdown\":\"## 项目背景\\n- 目标:内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套\\n- 预算上限:40 万\\n- 期望上线时间:Q1\\n- 已定:保留移动端入口;审批链最多 5 级;历史数据只读归档\"},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-02/context\"],\"markdown\":\"## 干系人\\n- 财务(审批人)\\n- 行政(发起人)\\n- IT(运维)\\n- 法务(事后复核合同)\"},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-02/open\"],\"markdown\":\"请完成以下待决问题的填写,以便推进项目进入下一阶段。带 * 的字段为必填项。\"},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-02/open\"],\"form\":{\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"signatory\",\"label\":\"验收标准签署人 *\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"财务\",\"行政\"],\"required\":true,\"placeholder\":\"请选择\",\"help\":\"确定由谁最终签署验收标准文档\"},{\"key\":\"concurrent_limit\",\"label\":\"并发审批上限 *\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"50\",\"200\"],\"required\":true,\"placeholder\":\"请选择\",\"help\":\"系统需支持的最大并发审批数\"},{\"key\":\"on_site_required\",\"label\":\"供应商是否要求驻场实施 *\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"是\",\"否\"],\"required\":true,\"placeholder\":\"请选择\",\"help\":\"供应商实施阶段是否需要在客户现场\"},{\"key\":\"retention_years\",\"label\":\"归档年限 *\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"3年\",\"5年\"],\"required\":true,\"placeholder\":\"请选择\",\"help\":\"历史审批数据的保存期限\"}]}}]}",
"repaired": true,
"valid_final": false,
"errors_final": [
"$: 未知节点类型 None",
"$: 未知节点类型 None",
"$: 未知节点类型 None",
"$: 未知节点类型 None"
],
"spec": null,
"wall_s": 32.9
}
+188
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,188 @@
{
"task": "ri-04",
"family": "requirement-input",
"arm": "G-hs",
"model": "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed",
"goalKind": "confirm",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 2053,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 815,
"completion_tokens": 1238,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 443
}
},
"latency_s": 15.35
},
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 3381,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 862,
"completion_tokens": 2519,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 443
}
},
"latency_s": 28.37
}
],
"callCount": 2,
"raw_first": "{\"title\":\"审批系统合并范围确认\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/context\",\"req:eval/ri-03/open\"],\"compare\":{\"left\":{\"title\":\"已定约束\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"kv\":{\"kv\":[[\"预算上限\",\"40万元\"],[\"上线时间\",\"Q1季度\"],[\"移动端入口\",\"保留\"],[\"审批链层级\",\"最多5级\"],[\"历史数据\",\"只读归档\"]]}},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/context\"],\"markdown\":\"**干系人职责**\"},{\"id\":\"n1c\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/context\"],\"list\":{\"items\":[\"财务 → 审批人\",\"行政 → 发起人\",\"IT → 运维\",\"法务 → 事后复核合同\"]}}]},\"right\":{\"title\":\"待决事项(逐项确认)\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/open\"],\"markdown\":\"以下4项需干系人拉齐后纳入SOW\"},\"id\":\"n2a\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/open\"],\"form\":{\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"paper_fallback\",\"label\":\"纸质兜底流程\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"保留\",\"取消\",\"另议\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"行政坚持 vs IT反对,需决策\"},{\"key\":\"acceptance_signer\",\"label\":\"验收标准签署人\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"财务\",\"行政\",\"财务+行政联合\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"明确谁对交付物具有签字确认权\"},{\"key\":\"concurrent_limit\",\"label\":\"并发审批上限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"50\",\"200\",\"按需评估\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"影响系统架构选型与数据库容量规划\"},{\"key\":\"onsite_required\",\"label\":\"供应商驻场要求\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"必须驻场\",\"可远程\",\"视项目阶段定\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"影响合同条款与差旅成本\"}]}}]}}}]}",
"valid_first": false,
"errors_first": [
"JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 583 (char 582)"
],
"stats_first": null,
"raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"审批系统合并项目 - 范围确认页\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/context\"],\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"已定约束\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/context\"],\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"项目范围\",\"内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套\"],[\"预算上限\",\"40 万元\"],[\"上线时间\",\"Q1\"],[\"移动端入口\",\"保留\"],[\"审批链深度\",\"最多 5 级\"],[\"历史数据\",\"只读归档\"]]},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/context\"],\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"财务\",\"审批人\"],[\"行政\",\"发起人\"],[\"IT\",\"运维\"],[\"法务\",\"事后复核合同\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/open\"],\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"待决事项\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/open\"],\"type\":\"compare\",\"compare\":{\"left\":{\"title\":\"行政坚持\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2a1\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**需要纸质兜底流程**\\n\\n理由:确保系统故障时审批业务不中断,满足合规审计要求。\"}]},\"right\":{\"title\":\"IT 反对\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2a2\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**不需要纸质兜底**\\n\\n理由:增加流程复杂度,与数字化转型目标冲突,维护成本高。\"}]}}},{\"id\":\"n2b\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/open\"],\"type\":\"list\",\"items\":[\"验收标准签署人:财务还是行政?\",\"并发审批上限:50 还是 200?\",\"供应商是否要求驻场实施?\"]}]}]}",
"repaired": true,
"valid_final": true,
"errors_final": [],
"spec": {
"title": "审批系统合并项目 - 范围确认页",
"nodes": [
{
"id": "n1",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-03/context"
],
"type": "section",
"title": "已定约束",
"children": [
{
"id": "n1a",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-03/context"
],
"type": "kv",
"kv": [
[
"项目范围",
"内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套"
],
[
"预算上限",
"40 万元"
],
[
"上线时间",
"Q1"
],
[
"移动端入口",
"保留"
],
[
"审批链深度",
"最多 5 级"
],
[
"历史数据",
"只读归档"
]
]
},
{
"id": "n1b",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-03/context"
],
"type": "kv",
"kv": [
[
"财务",
"审批人"
],
[
"行政",
"发起人"
],
[
"IT",
"运维"
],
[
"法务",
"事后复核合同"
]
]
}
]
},
{
"id": "n2",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-03/open"
],
"type": "section",
"title": "待决事项",
"children": [
{
"id": "n2a",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-03/open"
],
"type": "compare",
"compare": {
"left": {
"title": "行政坚持",
"nodes": [
{
"id": "n2a1",
"type": "markdown",
"markdown": "**需要纸质兜底流程**\n\n理由:确保系统故障时审批业务不中断,满足合规审计要求。"
}
]
},
"right": {
"title": "IT 反对",
"nodes": [
{
"id": "n2a2",
"type": "markdown",
"markdown": "**不需要纸质兜底**\n\n理由:增加流程复杂度,与数字化转型目标冲突,维护成本高。"
}
]
}
}
},
{
"id": "n2b",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-03/open"
],
"type": "list",
"items": [
"验收标准签署人:财务还是行政?",
"并发审批上限:50 还是 200?",
"供应商是否要求驻场实施?"
]
}
]
}
]
},
"stats_final": {
"nodes": 8,
"maxDepth": 3,
"types": [
"section",
"kv",
"kv",
"section",
"compare",
"markdown",
"markdown",
"list"
],
"refsUsed": [
"req:eval/ri-03/context",
"req:eval/ri-03/open"
],
"idsProvided": 8
},
"wall_s": 43.7
}
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
+365
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,365 @@
{
"task": "rc-07",
"family": "research-compare",
"arm": "G",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "compare",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 5847,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 1091,
"completion_tokens": 4756,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"reasoning_tokens": 3590
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 128
}
},
"latency_s": 27.48
}
],
"callCount": 1,
"raw_first": "{\"title\":\"三方工具选型对比 · 决策会一页\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"概览对比\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1t\",\"type\":\"table\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"],\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"dim\",\"label\":\"维度\"},{\"key\":\"v1\",\"label\":\"LarkPipe\"},{\"key\":\"v2\",\"label\":\"VaultKeep\"},{\"key\":\"v3\",\"label\":\"EchoDocs\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"r1\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"类型 / 上线\"],[\"v1\",\"消息管道 · 2019-03\"],[\"v2\",\"权限中枢 · 2022-08\"],[\"v3\",\"文档协同 · 2020-06\"]]},{\"id\":\"r2\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"核心能力\"],[\"v1\",\"Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量\"],[\"v2\",\"RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换\"],[\"v3\",\"批注、版本链、全文检索\"]]},{\"id\":\"r3\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"报价\"],[\"v1\",\"¥5 / 人 / 天\"],[\"v2\",\"¥15 / 人 / 天\"],[\"v3\",\"¥9 / 人 / 天\"]]},{\"id\":\"r4\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"部署形态\"],[\"v1\",\"仅 SaaS\"],[\"v2\",\"支持国密\"],[\"v3\",\"无离线\"]]},{\"id\":\"r5\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"半年发布次数\"],[\"v1\",\"7\"],[\"v2\",\"4\"],[\"v3\",\"2\"]]},{\"id\":\"r6\",\"cells\":[[\"dim\",\"平均修复周期\"],[\"v1\",\"2 天\"],[\"v2\",\"4 天\"],[\"v3\",\"1 天\"]]}]}},{\"id\":\"n1c\",\"type\":\"chart-lite\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2\",\"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3\"],\"chart\":{\"kind\":\"bar\",\"labels\":[\"LarkPipe\",\"VaultKeep\",\"EchoDocs\"],\"series\":[5,15,9]}}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"尽调风险备忘\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2t\",\"type\":\"tree\",\"source\":[\"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo\"],\"tree\":{\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"rk1\",\"label\":\"性能未验证\",\"tone\":\"danger\",\"badge\":\"高\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"rk1d\",\"label\":\"万行表格场景无官方基准\"}]},{\"id\":\"rk2\",\"label\":\"供应商锁定\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"badge\":\"中\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"rk2d\",\"label\":\"私有 API 占比 40%\"}]},{\"id\":\"rk3\",\"label\":\"培训成本\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"badge\":\"低\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"rk3d\",\"label\":\"界面术语与现有系统不一致\"}]}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"建议与理由\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3m\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**结论:按\\\"管道 + 权限\\\"双供应商组合选型,不建议三选一。**\\n\\n**推荐组合:LarkPipe + VaultKeep**\\n- **LarkPipe 承担消息链路**:上线最久(2019-03)、半年发布 7 次、修复周期 2 天,活跃度与稳定性最佳;¥5/人/天 成本最低。但**仅 SaaS**,需在合同中明确数据驻留与审计条款。\\n- **VaultKeep 承担权限中枢**:RBAC + 临时令牌 + 密钥轮换能力最完整,且**支持国密**,匹配合规要求。代价是 ¥15/人/天 报价最高、修复 4 天偏长,需预留兜底流程。\\n- **EchoDocs 暂作备选**:修复最快(1 天),适合协同场景补位;但**无离线**部署且发布频率低(半年仅 2 次),对核心链路投入价值有限。\\n\\n**关键风险缓释**(依据尽调风险备忘):\\n1. **性能未验证(高)**:三家在万行表格场景均无官方基准,签约前必须做 POC,覆盖吞吐、延迟、内存峰值。\\n2. **供应商锁定(中)**:私有 API 已占 40%,要求供应商提供 OpenAPI 描述与导出工具,并在合同约定数据可携性。\\n3. **培训成本(低)**:界面术语不一致,建议统一术语表 + 内部知识库,不阻塞选型。\\n\\n**若必须三选一**\\n- 重合规 / 权限:选 **VaultKeep**;\\n- 重成本 / 活跃度:选 **LarkPipe**;\\n- 仅作协同补位:选 **EchoDocs**。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"a1\",\"label\":\"查看 LarkPipe 尽调\",\"style\":\"default\"},{\"id\":\"a2\",\"label\":\"查看 VaultKeep 尽调\",\"style\":\"default\"},{\"id\":\"a3\",\"label\":\"查看 EchoDocs 尽调\",\"style\":\"default\"},{\"id\":\"a4\",\"label\":\"查看风险备忘\",\"style\":\"default\"}]}]}",
"valid_first": true,
"errors_first": [],
"stats_first": {
"nodes": 8,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"section",
"table",
"chart-lite",
"section",
"tree",
"section",
"markdown",
"actions"
],
"refsUsed": [
"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo",
"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1",
"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2",
"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3"
],
"unknownRefs": []
},
"repaired": false,
"valid_final": true,
"errors_final": [],
"spec": {
"title": "三方工具选型对比 · 决策会一页",
"nodes": [
{
"id": "n1",
"type": "section",
"title": "概览对比",
"source": [
"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1",
"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2",
"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3"
],
"children": [
{
"id": "n1t",
"type": "table",
"source": [
"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1",
"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2",
"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3"
],
"table": {
"columns": [
{
"key": "dim",
"label": "维度"
},
{
"key": "v1",
"label": "LarkPipe"
},
{
"key": "v2",
"label": "VaultKeep"
},
{
"key": "v3",
"label": "EchoDocs"
}
],
"rows": [
{
"id": "r1",
"cells": [
[
"dim",
"类型 / 上线"
],
[
"v1",
"消息管道 · 2019-03"
],
[
"v2",
"权限中枢 · 2022-08"
],
[
"v3",
"文档协同 · 2020-06"
]
]
},
{
"id": "r2",
"cells": [
[
"dim",
"核心能力"
],
[
"v1",
"Webhook 路由、重试策略、模板变量"
],
[
"v2",
"RBAC、临时令牌、密钥轮换"
],
[
"v3",
"批注、版本链、全文检索"
]
]
},
{
"id": "r3",
"cells": [
[
"dim",
"报价"
],
[
"v1",
"¥5 / 人 / 天"
],
[
"v2",
"¥15 / 人 / 天"
],
[
"v3",
"¥9 / 人 / 天"
]
]
},
{
"id": "r4",
"cells": [
[
"dim",
"部署形态"
],
[
"v1",
"仅 SaaS"
],
[
"v2",
"支持国密"
],
[
"v3",
"无离线"
]
]
},
{
"id": "r5",
"cells": [
[
"dim",
"半年发布次数"
],
[
"v1",
"7"
],
[
"v2",
"4"
],
[
"v3",
"2"
]
]
},
{
"id": "r6",
"cells": [
[
"dim",
"平均修复周期"
],
[
"v1",
"2 天"
],
[
"v2",
"4 天"
],
[
"v3",
"1 天"
]
]
}
]
}
},
{
"id": "n1c",
"type": "chart-lite",
"source": [
"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1",
"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2",
"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3"
],
"chart": {
"kind": "bar",
"labels": [
"LarkPipe",
"VaultKeep",
"EchoDocs"
],
"series": [
5,
15,
9
]
}
}
]
},
{
"id": "n2",
"type": "section",
"title": "尽调风险备忘",
"source": [
"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo"
],
"children": [
{
"id": "n2t",
"type": "tree",
"source": [
"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo"
],
"tree": {
"nodes": [
{
"id": "rk1",
"label": "性能未验证",
"tone": "danger",
"badge": "高",
"children": [
{
"id": "rk1d",
"label": "万行表格场景无官方基准"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rk2",
"label": "供应商锁定",
"tone": "warn",
"badge": "中",
"children": [
{
"id": "rk2d",
"label": "私有 API 占比 40%"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rk3",
"label": "培训成本",
"tone": "info",
"badge": "低",
"children": [
{
"id": "rk3d",
"label": "界面术语与现有系统不一致"
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
},
{
"id": "n3",
"type": "section",
"title": "建议与理由",
"children": [
{
"id": "n3m",
"type": "markdown",
"markdown": "**结论:按\"管道 + 权限\"双供应商组合选型,不建议三选一。**\n\n**推荐组合:LarkPipe + VaultKeep**\n- **LarkPipe 承担消息链路**:上线最久(2019-03)、半年发布 7 次、修复周期 2 天,活跃度与稳定性最佳;¥5/人/天 成本最低。但**仅 SaaS**,需在合同中明确数据驻留与审计条款。\n- **VaultKeep 承担权限中枢**:RBAC + 临时令牌 + 密钥轮换能力最完整,且**支持国密**,匹配合规要求。代价是 ¥15/人/天 报价最高、修复 4 天偏长,需预留兜底流程。\n- **EchoDocs 暂作备选**:修复最快(1 天),适合协同场景补位;但**无离线**部署且发布频率低(半年仅 2 次),对核心链路投入价值有限。\n\n**关键风险缓释**(依据尽调风险备忘):\n1. **性能未验证(高)**:三家在万行表格场景均无官方基准,签约前必须做 POC,覆盖吞吐、延迟、内存峰值。\n2. **供应商锁定(中)**:私有 API 已占 40%,要求供应商提供 OpenAPI 描述与导出工具,并在合同约定数据可携性。\n3. **培训成本(低)**:界面术语不一致,建议统一术语表 + 内部知识库,不阻塞选型。\n\n**若必须三选一**\n- 重合规 / 权限:选 **VaultKeep**;\n- 重成本 / 活跃度:选 **LarkPipe**;\n- 仅作协同补位:选 **EchoDocs**。"
}
]
},
{
"id": "n4",
"type": "actions",
"actions": [
{
"id": "a1",
"label": "查看 LarkPipe 尽调",
"style": "default"
},
{
"id": "a2",
"label": "查看 VaultKeep 尽调",
"style": "default"
},
{
"id": "a3",
"label": "查看 EchoDocs 尽调",
"style": "default"
},
{
"id": "a4",
"label": "查看风险备忘",
"style": "default"
}
]
}
]
},
"stats_final": {
"nodes": 8,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"section",
"table",
"chart-lite",
"section",
"tree",
"section",
"markdown",
"actions"
],
"refsUsed": [
"doc:eval/rc-07/riskmemo",
"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor1",
"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor2",
"doc:eval/rc-07/vendor3"
],
"idsProvided": 8
},
"wall_s": 27.5
}
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
+192
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,192 @@
{
"task": "ri-01",
"family": "requirement-input",
"arm": "G",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "collect",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 3472,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 971,
"completion_tokens": 2501,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"reasoning_tokens": 1930
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 128
}
},
"latency_s": 15.42
}
],
"callCount": 1,
"raw_first": "{\"title\":\"审批系统合并 · 待决问题收集\",\"nodes\":[{\"type\":\"section\",\"id\":\"n1\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-00/context\"],\"title\":\"项目背景与约束\",\"children\":[{\"type\":\"kv\",\"id\":\"n1a\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-00/context\"],\"kv\":[[\"目标\",\"把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套\"],[\"预算上限\",\"40 万\"],[\"期望上线\",\"Q1\"],[\"审批链级数\",\"最多 5 级\"],[\"移动端入口\",\"保留\"],[\"历史数据\",\"只读归档\"],[\"干系人\",\"财务(审批人)、行政(发起人)、IT(运维);法务事后复核合同\"]]}]},{\"type\":\"markdown\",\"id\":\"n2\",\"markdown\":\"请就以下 4 项待决问题一次性填写完成:标注 * 的是必填项,需给出明确选项;如信息尚未确认,请选择「待定」并在备注中说明,便于会议前对齐。\\n\\n填写建议(仅供参考):\\n- **驻场实施**会显著影响预算与排期,若选「是」建议同步估算差旅与人力成本。\\n- **并发上限** 50 与 200 差距较大,决定是否需要单独性能压测与扩容预算。\\n- **跨季度下线**会影响数据迁移窗口与旧系统续费成本,需提前与财务对齐。\\n- **验收签署方**决定责任边界,建议优先选择与审批口径一致的财务作为主签署人。\"},{\"type\":\"form\",\"id\":\"n3\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-00/open\"],\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"onsite_required\",\"label\":\"供应商是否要求驻场实施?*\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"是\",\"否\",\"部分驻场\",\"待定\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"影响预算与排期估算\"},{\"key\":\"concurrency_limit\",\"label\":\"并发审批上限*\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"50\",\"200\",\"其他数值\",\"待定\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"50 与 200 决定是否需要单独性能压测\"},{\"key\":\"cross_quarter_cutover\",\"label\":\"旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度?*\",\"type\":\"boolean\",\"required\":true,\"help\":\"跨季度会影响数据迁移与旧系统续费成本\"},{\"key\":\"acceptance_signer\",\"label\":\"验收标准由谁签署?*\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"财务\",\"行政\",\"财务+行政共同签署\",\"其他角色\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"决定验收责任边界\"}]},{\"type\":\"actions\",\"id\":\"n4\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"submit\",\"label\":\"提交收集结果\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"save_draft\",\"label\":\"保存草稿\",\"style\":\"default\"}]}]}",
"valid_first": true,
"errors_first": [],
"stats_first": {
"nodes": 5,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"section",
"kv",
"markdown",
"form",
"actions"
],
"refsUsed": [
"req:eval/ri-00/context",
"req:eval/ri-00/open"
],
"unknownRefs": []
},
"repaired": false,
"valid_final": true,
"errors_final": [],
"spec": {
"title": "审批系统合并 · 待决问题收集",
"nodes": [
{
"type": "section",
"id": "n1",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-00/context"
],
"title": "项目背景与约束",
"children": [
{
"type": "kv",
"id": "n1a",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-00/context"
],
"kv": [
[
"目标",
"把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套"
],
[
"预算上限",
"40 万"
],
[
"期望上线",
"Q1"
],
[
"审批链级数",
"最多 5 级"
],
[
"移动端入口",
"保留"
],
[
"历史数据",
"只读归档"
],
[
"干系人",
"财务(审批人)、行政(发起人)、IT(运维);法务事后复核合同"
]
]
}
]
},
{
"type": "markdown",
"id": "n2",
"markdown": "请就以下 4 项待决问题一次性填写完成:标注 * 的是必填项,需给出明确选项;如信息尚未确认,请选择「待定」并在备注中说明,便于会议前对齐。\n\n填写建议(仅供参考):\n- **驻场实施**会显著影响预算与排期,若选「是」建议同步估算差旅与人力成本。\n- **并发上限** 50 与 200 差距较大,决定是否需要单独性能压测与扩容预算。\n- **跨季度下线**会影响数据迁移窗口与旧系统续费成本,需提前与财务对齐。\n- **验收签署方**决定责任边界,建议优先选择与审批口径一致的财务作为主签署人。"
},
{
"type": "form",
"id": "n3",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-00/open"
],
"fields": [
{
"key": "onsite_required",
"label": "供应商是否要求驻场实施?*",
"type": "select",
"options": [
"是",
"否",
"部分驻场",
"待定"
],
"required": true,
"help": "影响预算与排期估算"
},
{
"key": "concurrency_limit",
"label": "并发审批上限*",
"type": "select",
"options": [
"50",
"200",
"其他数值",
"待定"
],
"required": true,
"help": "50 与 200 决定是否需要单独性能压测"
},
{
"key": "cross_quarter_cutover",
"label": "旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度?*",
"type": "boolean",
"required": true,
"help": "跨季度会影响数据迁移与旧系统续费成本"
},
{
"key": "acceptance_signer",
"label": "验收标准由谁签署?*",
"type": "select",
"options": [
"财务",
"行政",
"财务+行政共同签署",
"其他角色"
],
"required": true,
"help": "决定验收责任边界"
}
]
},
{
"type": "actions",
"id": "n4",
"actions": [
{
"id": "submit",
"label": "提交收集结果",
"style": "primary"
},
{
"id": "save_draft",
"label": "保存草稿",
"style": "default"
}
]
}
]
},
"stats_final": {
"nodes": 5,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"section",
"kv",
"markdown",
"form",
"actions"
],
"refsUsed": [
"req:eval/ri-00/context",
"req:eval/ri-00/open"
],
"idsProvided": 5
},
"wall_s": 15.4
}
+60
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
{
"task": "ri-02",
"family": "requirement-input",
"arm": "G",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "confirm",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 3271,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 968,
"completion_tokens": 2303,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"reasoning_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 768
}
},
"latency_s": 20.7
},
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 14383,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 1017,
"completion_tokens": 13366,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"reasoning_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 0
}
},
"latency_s": 103.38
}
],
"callCount": 2,
"raw_first": "{\"title\":\"审批系统合并 · 范围确认页\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"项目概览\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"],\"kv\":[[\"目标\",\"两套并行审批系统合并为一套\"],[\"预算上限\",\"40 万\"],[\"上线目标\",\"Q1\"],[\"审批链最大级数\",\"5 级\"],[\"历史数据\",\"只读归档\"],[\"保留入口\",\"移动端\"]]},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"type\":\"avatar\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"],\"avatar\":{\"name\":\"干系人\",\"sub\":\"审批 / 发起 / 运维 / 复核\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"stack\":[{\"name\":\"财务\",\"sub\":\"审批人\"},{\"name\":\"行政\",\"sub\":\"发起人\"},{\"name\":\"IT\",\"sub\":\"运维\"},{\"name\":\"法务\",\"sub\":\"事后复核合同\"}]}},{\"id\":\"n1c\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"本页将「已定约束」与「待决问题」分块呈现,已定项作为硬约束不再变更;待决项供逐项勾选确认,确认结果即形成本次合并项目的范围基线。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"compare\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-01/context\",\"req:eval/ri-01/open\"],\"compare\":{\"left\":{\"title\":\"已定约束(不再变更)\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2l1\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"以下项已确定,作为本项目的硬约束。\"},{\"id\":\"n2l2\",\"type\":\"list\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"],\"items\":[\"保留移动端入口\",\"审批链最多 5 级\",\"历史数据只读归档\",\"预算上限 40 万\",\"Q1 上线目标\"]},{\"id\":\"n2l3\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"说明:法务为合同事后复核角色,不进入实时审批链;IT 负责新系统运维并承接旧系统下线。\"}]},\"right\":{\"title\":\"待决问题(需逐项确认)\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2r1\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"以下项存在二选一或未决状态,需在本页勾选确认。\"},{\"id\":\"n2r2\",\"type\":\"list\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-01/open\"],\"items\":[\"旧系统下线窗口:是否允许跨季度?\",\"并发审批上限:50 还是 200?\",\"归档年限未定:3 年还是 5 年?\",\"供应商是否要求驻场实施?\"]}]}}},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"逐项确认\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-01/open\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-01/open\"],\"steps\":{\"current\":0,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"下线窗口\",\"status\":\"active\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"label\":\"并发上限\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"label\":\"归档年限\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"label\":\"驻场实施\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"warn\"}]}},{\"id\":\"n3b\",\"type\":\"form\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-01/open\"],\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"decommission_window\",\"label\":\"旧系统下线窗口\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"本季度内下线\",\"允许跨季度\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"决定新旧系统并行期长度与切换风险\"},{\"key\":\"concurrency_cap\",\"label\":\"并发审批上限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"50\",\"200\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"影响架构选型与性能预算\"},{\"key\":\"archive_years\",\"label\":\"归档年限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"3 年\",\"5 年\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"影响存储成本与合规保留期\"},{\"key\":\"onsite_required\",\"label\":\"供应商驻场实施\",\"type\":\"boolean\",\"required\":true,\"help\":\"影响合同结构、实施周期与预算占用\"}]}},{\"id\":\"n3c\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"提示:四项任一未选都无法提交范围基线。建议优先确认「下线窗口」与「并发上限」——这两项直接影响架构与上线排期。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"a1\",\"label\":\"确认范围基线\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"a2\",\"label\":\"导出确认页\",\"style\":\"default\"},{\"id\":\"a3\",\"label\":\"标记需再评审\",\"style\":\"danger\"}]}]}",
"valid_first": false,
"errors_first": [
"JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 2279 (char 2278)"
],
"stats_first": null,
"raw_repair": "{\n \"title\": \"范围确认 · 内部审批系统合并\",\n \"nodes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n1\",\n \"markdown\": \"背景摘要:把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套,预算上限 40 万,期望 Q1 上线;本页用于逐项确认范围。\",\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n2\",\n \"title\": \"干系人\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n2a\",\n \"avatar\": {\"name\": \"财务\", \"sub\": \"审批人\", \"tone\": \"info\"},\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n2b\",\n \"avatar\": {\"name\": \"行政\", \"sub\": \"发起人\", \"tone\": \"ok\"},\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n2c\",\n \"avatar\": {\"name\": \"IT\", \"sub\": \"运维\", \"tone\": \"info\"},\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n2d\",\n \"avatar\": {\"name\": \"法务\", \"sub\": \"事后复核合同\", \"tone\": \"warn\"},\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"]\n }\n ],\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n3\",\n \"title\": \"已定约束\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n3a\",\n \"table\": {\n \"columns\": [\n {\"key\": \"item\", \"label\": \"约束项\"},\n {\"key\": \"value\", \"label\": \"取值\"},\n {\"key\": \"src\", \"label\": \"出处\"}\n ],\n \"rows\": [\n {\"id\": \"r1\", \"cells\": [[\"item\", \"保留移动端入口\"], [\"value\", \"是\"], [\"src\", \"context\"]]},\n {\"id\": \"r2\", \"cells\": [[\"item\", \"审批链最大层级\"], [\"value\", \"5 级\"], [\"src\", \"context\"]]},\n {\"id\": \"r3\", \"cells\": [[\"item\", \"历史数据处理\"], [\"value\", \"只读归档\"], [\"src\", \"context\"]]},\n {\"id\": \"r4\", \"cells\": [[\"item\", \"预算上限\"], [\"value\", \"40 万\"], [\"src\", \"context\"]]},\n {\"id\": \"r5\", \"cells\": [[\"item\", \"期望上线时间\"], [\"value\", \"Q1\"], [\"src\", \"context\"]]}\n ]\n },\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"]\n }\n ],\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-01/context\"]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n4\",\n \"title\": \"待决事项(请逐项确认)\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n4a\",\n \"fields\": [\n {\"key\": \"decom_window\", \"label\": \"旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度\", \"type\": \"boolean\", \"help\": \"影响迁移窗口与并行期成本\"},\n {\"key\": \"concurrency\", \"label\": \"并发审批上限\", \"type\": \"select\", \"options\": [\"50\", \"200\"], \"help\": \"影响性能预算与压测目标\"},\n {\"key\": \"retention_years\", \"label\": \"归档年限\", \"type\": \"select\", \"options\": [\"3 年\", \"5 年\"], \"help\": \"影响存储成本与合规口径\"},\n {\"key\": \"onsite_required\", \"label\": \"供应商是否要求驻场实施\", \"type\": \"boolean\", \"help\": \"影响差旅与现场协调成本\"}\n ],\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-01/open\"]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n4b\",\n \"markdown\": \"建议优先确定并发上限与归档年限,二者直接影响架构与存储选型;下线窗口与驻场要求可在签约前再确认。\"\n }\n ],\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-01/open\"]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n5\",\n \"actions\": [\n {\"id\": \"a1\", \"label\": \"确认已定约束\", \"style\": \"primary\"},\n {\"id\": \"a2\", \"label\": \"提交待决答复\", \"style\": \"default\"},\n {\"id\": \"a3\", \"label\": \"退回补充材料\", \"style\": \"danger\"}\n ],\n \"source\": [\"req:eval/ri-01/open\"]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n6\",\n \"docId\": \"req:eval/ri-01/context\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n7\",\n \"docId\": \"req:eval/ri-01/open\"\n }\n ]\n}",
"repaired": true,
"valid_final": false,
"errors_final": [
"$: 未知节点类型 None",
"$: 未知节点类型 None",
"$: 未知节点类型 None",
"$: 未知节点类型 None",
"$: 未知节点类型 None",
"$: 未知节点类型 None",
"$: 未知节点类型 None"
],
"spec": null,
"wall_s": 124.1
}
+212
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
{
"task": "ri-03",
"family": "requirement-input",
"arm": "G",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "collect",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 5119,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 973,
"completion_tokens": 4146,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 128
}
},
"latency_s": 39.58
}
],
"callCount": 1,
"raw_first": "{\"title\":\"审批系统合并 — 待决问题收集\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"项目背景与已定事项\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-02/context\"],\"kv\":[[\"合并目标\",\"将两套并行审批系统合并为一套\"],[\"预算上限\",\"40 万\"],[\"期望上线\",\"Q1\"],[\"财务\",\"审批人\"],[\"行政\",\"发起人\"],[\"IT\",\"运维\"],[\"法务\",\"事后复核合同\"],[\"已定·移动端\",\"保留入口\"],[\"已定·审批链\",\"最多 5 级\"],[\"已定·历史数据\",\"只读归档\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"待决问题(请填写)\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"以下 4 个问题直接关系到 Q1 上线前的合同条款与实施安排,建议在一次评审会上定稿,逐项勾选后一次性提交即可。\"},{\"id\":\"n2b\",\"type\":\"form\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-02/open\"],\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"acceptance_signer\",\"label\":\"验收标准由谁签署\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"财务\",\"行政\"],\"required\":true,\"placeholder\":\"请选择\"},{\"key\":\"concurrent_limit\",\"label\":\"并发审批上限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"50\",\"200\"],\"required\":true,\"placeholder\":\"请选择\"},{\"key\":\"supplier_onsite\",\"label\":\"供应商是否要求驻场实施\",\"type\":\"boolean\",\"required\":true,\"default\":false},{\"key\":\"archive_years\",\"label\":\"归档年限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"3 年\",\"5 年\"],\"required\":true,\"placeholder\":\"请选择\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2c\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"submit\",\"label\":\"提交决策结果\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"save_draft\",\"label\":\"保存为草稿\"},{\"id\":\"cancel\",\"label\":\"取消\",\"style\":\"danger\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2d\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"提交后将按如下口径汇总:签署方 → 合同附件签字主体;并发上限 → 后端容量与压测指标;驻场实施 → 差旅与人力预算;归档年限 → 存储容量与合规成本。\"}]}]}",
"valid_first": true,
"errors_first": [],
"stats_first": {
"nodes": 7,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"section",
"kv",
"section",
"markdown",
"form",
"actions",
"markdown"
],
"refsUsed": [
"req:eval/ri-02/context",
"req:eval/ri-02/open"
],
"unknownRefs": []
},
"repaired": false,
"valid_final": true,
"errors_final": [],
"spec": {
"title": "审批系统合并 — 待决问题收集",
"nodes": [
{
"id": "n1",
"type": "section",
"title": "项目背景与已定事项",
"children": [
{
"id": "n1a",
"type": "kv",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-02/context"
],
"kv": [
[
"合并目标",
"将两套并行审批系统合并为一套"
],
[
"预算上限",
"40 万"
],
[
"期望上线",
"Q1"
],
[
"财务",
"审批人"
],
[
"行政",
"发起人"
],
[
"IT",
"运维"
],
[
"法务",
"事后复核合同"
],
[
"已定·移动端",
"保留入口"
],
[
"已定·审批链",
"最多 5 级"
],
[
"已定·历史数据",
"只读归档"
]
]
}
]
},
{
"id": "n2",
"type": "section",
"title": "待决问题(请填写)",
"children": [
{
"id": "n2a",
"type": "markdown",
"markdown": "以下 4 个问题直接关系到 Q1 上线前的合同条款与实施安排,建议在一次评审会上定稿,逐项勾选后一次性提交即可。"
},
{
"id": "n2b",
"type": "form",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-02/open"
],
"fields": [
{
"key": "acceptance_signer",
"label": "验收标准由谁签署",
"type": "select",
"options": [
"财务",
"行政"
],
"required": true,
"placeholder": "请选择"
},
{
"key": "concurrent_limit",
"label": "并发审批上限",
"type": "select",
"options": [
"50",
"200"
],
"required": true,
"placeholder": "请选择"
},
{
"key": "supplier_onsite",
"label": "供应商是否要求驻场实施",
"type": "boolean",
"required": true,
"default": false
},
{
"key": "archive_years",
"label": "归档年限",
"type": "select",
"options": [
"3 年",
"5 年"
],
"required": true,
"placeholder": "请选择"
}
]
},
{
"id": "n2c",
"type": "actions",
"actions": [
{
"id": "submit",
"label": "提交决策结果",
"style": "primary"
},
{
"id": "save_draft",
"label": "保存为草稿"
},
{
"id": "cancel",
"label": "取消",
"style": "danger"
}
]
},
{
"id": "n2d",
"type": "markdown",
"markdown": "提交后将按如下口径汇总:签署方 → 合同附件签字主体;并发上限 → 后端容量与压测指标;驻场实施 → 差旅与人力预算;归档年限 → 存储容量与合规成本。"
}
]
}
]
},
"stats_final": {
"nodes": 7,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"section",
"kv",
"section",
"markdown",
"form",
"actions",
"markdown"
],
"refsUsed": [
"req:eval/ri-02/context",
"req:eval/ri-02/open"
],
"idsProvided": 7
},
"wall_s": 39.6
}
+369
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,369 @@
{
"task": "ri-04",
"family": "requirement-input",
"arm": "G",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "confirm",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 7349,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 971,
"completion_tokens": 6378,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 128
}
},
"latency_s": 61.36
}
],
"callCount": 1,
"raw_first": "{\"title\":\"审批系统合并 · 范围确认页\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"项目背景\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/context\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"将内部审批从**两套并行系统**合并为**一套统一系统**。预算上限 40 万,期望 Q1 上线。本页用于实施启动前逐项确认范围。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"干系人与职责\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/context\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"财务\",\"审批人\"],[\"行政\",\"发起人\"],[\"IT\",\"运维\"],[\"法务\",\"事后复核合同\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"已定约束 · 5 项\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/context\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n6\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"预算上限\",\"≤ 40 万\"],[\"上线时间\",\"Q1\"],[\"移动端入口\",\"保留\"],[\"审批链最大级数\",\"5 级\"],[\"历史数据处理\",\"只读归档\"]]},{\"id\":\"n7\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"以上为已落定约束,实施过程中如需变更须走变更评审。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n8\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"待决事项 · 4 项待逐项确认\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-03/open\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n9\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"以下事项尚未拍板,每项给出当前立场与可选项,请按编号逐项选定。\"},{\"id\":\"n10\",\"type\":\"table\",\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"no\",\"label\":\"#\"},{\"key\":\"q\",\"label\":\"待决问题\"},{\"key\":\"pos\",\"label\":\"当前立场\"},{\"key\":\"opt\",\"label\":\"可选方案\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"r1\",\"cells\":[[\"no\",\"①\"],[\"q\",\"是否需要纸质兜底流程\"],[\"pos\",\"行政坚持 / IT 反对\"],[\"opt\",\"启用 或 不启用\"]]},{\"id\":\"r2\",\"cells\":[[\"no\",\"②\"],[\"q\",\"验收标准由谁签署\"],[\"pos\",\"待拍板\"],[\"opt\",\"财务 或 行政\"]]},{\"id\":\"r3\",\"cells\":[[\"no\",\"③\"],[\"q\",\"并发审批上限\"],[\"pos\",\"待拍板\"],[\"opt\",\"50 或 200\"]]},{\"id\":\"r4\",\"cells\":[[\"no\",\"④\"],[\"q\",\"供应商是否要求驻场实施\"],[\"pos\",\"待拍板\"],[\"opt\",\"需要 或 不需要\"]]}]}},{\"id\":\"n11\",\"type\":\"form\",\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"q1_paper_fallback\",\"label\":\"① 纸质兜底流程\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"启用\",\"不启用\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"行政坚持、IT 反对,需决策人拍板\"},{\"key\":\"q2_signer\",\"label\":\"② 验收标准签署人\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"财务\",\"行政\"],\"required\":true},{\"key\":\"q3_concurrent\",\"label\":\"③ 并发审批上限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"50\",\"200\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"如选 50,请评估上线后扩容成本\"},{\"key\":\"q4_onsite\",\"label\":\"④ 供应商驻场实施\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"需要\",\"不需要\"],\"required\":true}]},{\"id\":\"n12\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"补充说明:① 若启用纸质兜底,请另附纸面流程与归档机制;③ 数值选择宜保留 2~3 倍峰值冗余以应对上线后增长。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n13\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"confirm\",\"label\":\"提交范围确认\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"hold\",\"label\":\"暂存草稿\",\"style\":\"default\"},{\"id\":\"reopen\",\"label\":\"有异议,逐项再议\",\"style\":\"danger\"}]}]}",
"valid_first": true,
"errors_first": [],
"stats_first": {
"nodes": 13,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"section",
"markdown",
"section",
"kv",
"section",
"kv",
"markdown",
"section",
"markdown",
"table",
"form",
"markdown",
"actions"
],
"refsUsed": [
"req:eval/ri-03/context",
"req:eval/ri-03/open"
],
"unknownRefs": []
},
"repaired": false,
"valid_final": true,
"errors_final": [],
"spec": {
"title": "审批系统合并 · 范围确认页",
"nodes": [
{
"id": "n1",
"type": "section",
"title": "项目背景",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-03/context"
],
"children": [
{
"id": "n2",
"type": "markdown",
"markdown": "将内部审批从**两套并行系统**合并为**一套统一系统**。预算上限 40 万,期望 Q1 上线。本页用于实施启动前逐项确认范围。"
}
]
},
{
"id": "n3",
"type": "section",
"title": "干系人与职责",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-03/context"
],
"children": [
{
"id": "n4",
"type": "kv",
"kv": [
[
"财务",
"审批人"
],
[
"行政",
"发起人"
],
[
"IT",
"运维"
],
[
"法务",
"事后复核合同"
]
]
}
]
},
{
"id": "n5",
"type": "section",
"title": "已定约束 · 5 项",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-03/context"
],
"children": [
{
"id": "n6",
"type": "kv",
"kv": [
[
"预算上限",
"≤ 40 万"
],
[
"上线时间",
"Q1"
],
[
"移动端入口",
"保留"
],
[
"审批链最大级数",
"5 级"
],
[
"历史数据处理",
"只读归档"
]
]
},
{
"id": "n7",
"type": "markdown",
"markdown": "以上为已落定约束,实施过程中如需变更须走变更评审。"
}
]
},
{
"id": "n8",
"type": "section",
"title": "待决事项 · 4 项待逐项确认",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-03/open"
],
"children": [
{
"id": "n9",
"type": "markdown",
"markdown": "以下事项尚未拍板,每项给出当前立场与可选项,请按编号逐项选定。"
},
{
"id": "n10",
"type": "table",
"table": {
"columns": [
{
"key": "no",
"label": "#"
},
{
"key": "q",
"label": "待决问题"
},
{
"key": "pos",
"label": "当前立场"
},
{
"key": "opt",
"label": "可选方案"
}
],
"rows": [
{
"id": "r1",
"cells": [
[
"no",
"①"
],
[
"q",
"是否需要纸质兜底流程"
],
[
"pos",
"行政坚持 / IT 反对"
],
[
"opt",
"启用 或 不启用"
]
]
},
{
"id": "r2",
"cells": [
[
"no",
"②"
],
[
"q",
"验收标准由谁签署"
],
[
"pos",
"待拍板"
],
[
"opt",
"财务 或 行政"
]
]
},
{
"id": "r3",
"cells": [
[
"no",
"③"
],
[
"q",
"并发审批上限"
],
[
"pos",
"待拍板"
],
[
"opt",
"50 或 200"
]
]
},
{
"id": "r4",
"cells": [
[
"no",
"④"
],
[
"q",
"供应商是否要求驻场实施"
],
[
"pos",
"待拍板"
],
[
"opt",
"需要 或 不需要"
]
]
}
]
}
},
{
"id": "n11",
"type": "form",
"fields": [
{
"key": "q1_paper_fallback",
"label": "① 纸质兜底流程",
"type": "select",
"options": [
"启用",
"不启用"
],
"required": true,
"help": "行政坚持、IT 反对,需决策人拍板"
},
{
"key": "q2_signer",
"label": "② 验收标准签署人",
"type": "select",
"options": [
"财务",
"行政"
],
"required": true
},
{
"key": "q3_concurrent",
"label": "③ 并发审批上限",
"type": "select",
"options": [
"50",
"200"
],
"required": true,
"help": "如选 50,请评估上线后扩容成本"
},
{
"key": "q4_onsite",
"label": "④ 供应商驻场实施",
"type": "select",
"options": [
"需要",
"不需要"
],
"required": true
}
]
},
{
"id": "n12",
"type": "markdown",
"markdown": "补充说明:① 若启用纸质兜底,请另附纸面流程与归档机制;③ 数值选择宜保留 2~3 倍峰值冗余以应对上线后增长。"
}
]
},
{
"id": "n13",
"type": "actions",
"actions": [
{
"id": "confirm",
"label": "提交范围确认",
"style": "primary"
},
{
"id": "hold",
"label": "暂存草稿",
"style": "default"
},
{
"id": "reopen",
"label": "有异议,逐项再议",
"style": "danger"
}
]
}
]
},
"stats_final": {
"nodes": 13,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"section",
"markdown",
"section",
"kv",
"section",
"kv",
"markdown",
"section",
"markdown",
"table",
"form",
"markdown",
"actions"
],
"refsUsed": [
"req:eval/ri-03/context",
"req:eval/ri-03/open"
],
"idsProvided": 13
},
"wall_s": 61.4
}
+212
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
{
"task": "ri-05",
"family": "requirement-input",
"arm": "G",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "collect",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 3002,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 971,
"completion_tokens": 2031,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"reasoning_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 0
}
},
"latency_s": 15.88
}
],
"callCount": 1,
"raw_first": "{\"title\":\"审批系统合并·待决问题收集表\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"项目背景与既定约束\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-04/context\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"将两套并行的内部审批系统合并为一套,预算上限 40 万,期望 Q1 上线。干系人:财务(审批人)、行政(发起人)、IT(运维),法务事后复核合同。\"},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-04/context\"],\"kv\":[[\"预算上限\",\"40 万\"],[\"目标上线\",\"Q1\"],[\"审批链级数\",\"最多 5 级\"],[\"历史数据\",\"只读归档\"],[\"移动端入口\",\"保留\"],[\"法务介入\",\"事后复核合同\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"待决问题填写\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-04/open\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-04/open\"],\"markdown\":\"以下 4 项为待决问题,请逐项勾选或选择;带 * 为必填。\"},{\"id\":\"n2b\",\"type\":\"form\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-04/open\"],\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"signer\",\"label\":\"验收标准签署方 *\",\"type\":\"select\",\"required\":true,\"options\":[\"财务\",\"行政\",\"财务+行政 联合签署\",\"暂未决定\"],\"help\":\"确定由哪一方对最终验收标准签字背书\",\"placeholder\":\"请选择签署方\"},{\"key\":\"decom_cross_quarter\",\"label\":\"旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度 *\",\"type\":\"boolean\",\"required\":true,\"help\":\"若否,则所有旧系统需在 Q1 内完成下线\"},{\"key\":\"concurrency_cap\",\"label\":\"并发审批上限 *\",\"type\":\"select\",\"required\":true,\"options\":[\"50\",\"200\",\"自定义数值\"],\"help\":\"自定义数值请在下方“备注”中注明具体数字\"},{\"key\":\"onsite\",\"label\":\"供应商是否要求驻场实施 *\",\"type\":\"boolean\",\"required\":true,\"help\":\"影响差旅成本与现场协调安排\"},{\"key\":\"notes\",\"label\":\"备注与决策依据\",\"type\":\"textarea\",\"required\":false,\"placeholder\":\"补充选择依据、阻力点或额外说明……\",\"help\":\"尤其是“自定义并发上限”的具体数值,建议在此写明\"}]}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"submit\",\"label\":\"提交决策\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"save\",\"label\":\"保存草稿\",\"style\":\"default\"}]}]}",
"valid_first": true,
"errors_first": [],
"stats_first": {
"nodes": 7,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"section",
"markdown",
"kv",
"section",
"markdown",
"form",
"actions"
],
"refsUsed": [
"req:eval/ri-04/context",
"req:eval/ri-04/open"
],
"unknownRefs": []
},
"repaired": false,
"valid_final": true,
"errors_final": [],
"spec": {
"title": "审批系统合并·待决问题收集表",
"nodes": [
{
"id": "n1",
"type": "section",
"title": "项目背景与既定约束",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-04/context"
],
"children": [
{
"id": "n1a",
"type": "markdown",
"markdown": "将两套并行的内部审批系统合并为一套,预算上限 40 万,期望 Q1 上线。干系人:财务(审批人)、行政(发起人)、IT(运维),法务事后复核合同。"
},
{
"id": "n1b",
"type": "kv",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-04/context"
],
"kv": [
[
"预算上限",
"40 万"
],
[
"目标上线",
"Q1"
],
[
"审批链级数",
"最多 5 级"
],
[
"历史数据",
"只读归档"
],
[
"移动端入口",
"保留"
],
[
"法务介入",
"事后复核合同"
]
]
}
]
},
{
"id": "n2",
"type": "section",
"title": "待决问题填写",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-04/open"
],
"children": [
{
"id": "n2a",
"type": "markdown",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-04/open"
],
"markdown": "以下 4 项为待决问题,请逐项勾选或选择;带 * 为必填。"
},
{
"id": "n2b",
"type": "form",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-04/open"
],
"fields": [
{
"key": "signer",
"label": "验收标准签署方 *",
"type": "select",
"required": true,
"options": [
"财务",
"行政",
"财务+行政 联合签署",
"暂未决定"
],
"help": "确定由哪一方对最终验收标准签字背书",
"placeholder": "请选择签署方"
},
{
"key": "decom_cross_quarter",
"label": "旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度 *",
"type": "boolean",
"required": true,
"help": "若否,则所有旧系统需在 Q1 内完成下线"
},
{
"key": "concurrency_cap",
"label": "并发审批上限 *",
"type": "select",
"required": true,
"options": [
"50",
"200",
"自定义数值"
],
"help": "自定义数值请在下方“备注”中注明具体数字"
},
{
"key": "onsite",
"label": "供应商是否要求驻场实施 *",
"type": "boolean",
"required": true,
"help": "影响差旅成本与现场协调安排"
},
{
"key": "notes",
"label": "备注与决策依据",
"type": "textarea",
"required": false,
"placeholder": "补充选择依据、阻力点或额外说明……",
"help": "尤其是“自定义并发上限”的具体数值,建议在此写明"
}
]
}
]
},
{
"id": "n3",
"type": "actions",
"actions": [
{
"id": "submit",
"label": "提交决策",
"style": "primary"
},
{
"id": "save",
"label": "保存草稿",
"style": "default"
}
]
}
]
},
"stats_final": {
"nodes": 7,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"section",
"markdown",
"kv",
"section",
"markdown",
"form",
"actions"
],
"refsUsed": [
"req:eval/ri-04/context",
"req:eval/ri-04/open"
],
"idsProvided": 7
},
"wall_s": 15.9
}
+225
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
{
"task": "ri-06",
"family": "requirement-input",
"arm": "G",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "confirm",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 4296,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 973,
"completion_tokens": 3323,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"reasoning_tokens": 2744
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 128
}
},
"latency_s": 26.57
}
],
"callCount": 1,
"raw_first": "{\"title\":\"审批合并项目 · 范围确认\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"tabs\",\"tabs\":{\"tabs\":[{\"id\":\"tab-fixed\",\"label\":\"已定约束\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套,预算上限 40 万,期望 Q1 上线;法务负责合同事后复核。\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-05/context\"]},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-05/context\"],\"kv\":[[\"预算上限\",\"40 万\"],[\"上线目标\",\"Q1\"],[\"审批链级数\",\"最多 5 级\"],[\"移动端入口\",\"保留\"],[\"历史数据\",\"只读归档\"],[\"合同复核\",\"法务事后复核\"]]},{\"id\":\"n1c\",\"type\":\"list\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-05/context\"],\"items\":[\"财务 — 审批人\",\"行政 — 发起人\",\"IT — 运维\",\"法务 — 合同事后复核\"]}]},{\"id\":\"tab-open\",\"label\":\"待决事项(逐项确认)\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"以下 4 项需要逐项拍板。建议按顺序逐一确认后统一提交;如某项尚未达成共识,可先留空待后续会议仲裁。\"},{\"id\":\"n2b\",\"type\":\"form\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-05/open\"],\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"paper_fallback\",\"label\":\"① 是否需要纸质兜底流程?\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"保留纸质兜底\",\"完全电子化(取消纸质)\",\"仅异常情况启用纸质\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"行政坚持保留,IT 反对 —— 需仲裁。\"},{\"key\":\"acceptance_signer\",\"label\":\"② 验收标准由谁签署?\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"财务签署\",\"行政签署\",\"财务 + 行政联签\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"财务与行政存在分歧,需明确单一责任人或联签机制。\"},{\"key\":\"vendor_onsite\",\"label\":\"③ 供应商是否要求驻场实施?\",\"type\":\"boolean\",\"required\":true,\"help\":\"影响预算与人天安排,需向供应商索取书面确认。\"},{\"key\":\"archive_years\",\"label\":\"④ 历史数据归档年限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"3 年\",\"5 年\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"建议结合合规要求与存储成本综合决定。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2c\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"submit\",\"label\":\"提交范围确认\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"reset\",\"label\":\"清空选择\",\"style\":\"default\"},{\"id\":\"escalate\",\"label\":\"上报仲裁\",\"style\":\"danger\"}]}]}],\"active\":\"tab-fixed\"}}]}",
"valid_first": true,
"errors_first": [],
"stats_first": {
"nodes": 7,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"tabs",
"markdown",
"kv",
"list",
"markdown",
"form",
"actions"
],
"refsUsed": [
"req:eval/ri-05/context",
"req:eval/ri-05/open"
],
"unknownRefs": []
},
"repaired": false,
"valid_final": true,
"errors_final": [],
"spec": {
"title": "审批合并项目 · 范围确认",
"nodes": [
{
"id": "n1",
"type": "tabs",
"tabs": {
"tabs": [
{
"id": "tab-fixed",
"label": "已定约束",
"nodes": [
{
"id": "n1a",
"type": "markdown",
"markdown": "把内部审批从两套并行系统合并为一套,预算上限 40 万,期望 Q1 上线;法务负责合同事后复核。",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-05/context"
]
},
{
"id": "n1b",
"type": "kv",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-05/context"
],
"kv": [
[
"预算上限",
"40 万"
],
[
"上线目标",
"Q1"
],
[
"审批链级数",
"最多 5 级"
],
[
"移动端入口",
"保留"
],
[
"历史数据",
"只读归档"
],
[
"合同复核",
"法务事后复核"
]
]
},
{
"id": "n1c",
"type": "list",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-05/context"
],
"items": [
"财务 — 审批人",
"行政 — 发起人",
"IT — 运维",
"法务 — 合同事后复核"
]
}
]
},
{
"id": "tab-open",
"label": "待决事项(逐项确认)",
"nodes": [
{
"id": "n2a",
"type": "markdown",
"markdown": "以下 4 项需要逐项拍板。建议按顺序逐一确认后统一提交;如某项尚未达成共识,可先留空待后续会议仲裁。"
},
{
"id": "n2b",
"type": "form",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-05/open"
],
"fields": [
{
"key": "paper_fallback",
"label": "① 是否需要纸质兜底流程?",
"type": "select",
"options": [
"保留纸质兜底",
"完全电子化(取消纸质)",
"仅异常情况启用纸质"
],
"required": true,
"help": "行政坚持保留,IT 反对 —— 需仲裁。"
},
{
"key": "acceptance_signer",
"label": "② 验收标准由谁签署?",
"type": "select",
"options": [
"财务签署",
"行政签署",
"财务 + 行政联签"
],
"required": true,
"help": "财务与行政存在分歧,需明确单一责任人或联签机制。"
},
{
"key": "vendor_onsite",
"label": "③ 供应商是否要求驻场实施?",
"type": "boolean",
"required": true,
"help": "影响预算与人天安排,需向供应商索取书面确认。"
},
{
"key": "archive_years",
"label": "④ 历史数据归档年限",
"type": "select",
"options": [
"3 年",
"5 年"
],
"required": true,
"help": "建议结合合规要求与存储成本综合决定。"
}
]
},
{
"id": "n2c",
"type": "actions",
"actions": [
{
"id": "submit",
"label": "提交范围确认",
"style": "primary"
},
{
"id": "reset",
"label": "清空选择",
"style": "default"
},
{
"id": "escalate",
"label": "上报仲裁",
"style": "danger"
}
]
}
]
}
],
"active": "tab-fixed"
}
}
]
},
"stats_final": {
"nodes": 7,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"tabs",
"markdown",
"kv",
"list",
"markdown",
"form",
"actions"
],
"refsUsed": [
"req:eval/ri-05/context",
"req:eval/ri-05/open"
],
"idsProvided": 7
},
"wall_s": 26.6
}
+212
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
{
"task": "ri-07",
"family": "requirement-input",
"arm": "G",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "collect",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 5899,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 971,
"completion_tokens": 4928,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 128
}
},
"latency_s": 42.28
}
],
"callCount": 1,
"raw_first": "{\"title\":\"审批系统合并 · 待决问题一次性收集\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"项目背景速览\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"本页用于一次性收齐四个待决项,所有题均为必填。提交后会作为后续预算细分、上线排期与干系人对齐的依据。\"},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"预算上限\",\"40 万\"],[\"上线目标\",\"Q1\"],[\"审批链上限\",\"5 级\"],[\"移动端入口\",\"保留\"],[\"历史数据\",\"只读归档\"],[\"财务\",\"审批人\"],[\"行政\",\"发起人\"],[\"IT\",\"运维\"],[\"法务\",\"合同事后复核\"]],\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-06/context\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"四个待决问题(全部必填)\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"form\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-06/open\"],\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"shutdown_window_cross_quarter\",\"label\":\"Q1 · 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度?\",\"type\":\"select\",\"required\":true,\"options\":[\"允许跨季度\",\"不允许(必须在本季度内完成)\",\"需进一步与 IT/财务讨论\"],\"help\":\"影响并行期运维成本与数据迁移节奏\"},{\"key\":\"acceptance_signer\",\"label\":\"Q2 · 验收标准由谁签署?\",\"type\":\"select\",\"required\":true,\"options\":[\"财务\",\"行政\",\"财务 + 行政 联合签署\"],\"help\":\"财务为审批人,行政为发起人,最终签字方尚未指定\"},{\"key\":\"vendor_on_site\",\"label\":\"Q3 · 供应商是否要求驻场实施?\",\"type\":\"select\",\"required\":true,\"options\":[\"要求全驻场\",\"要求部分驻场(仅关键节点)\",\"不需要驻场(远程实施)\"],\"help\":\"决定预算内是否需要预留差旅与场地费用\"},{\"key\":\"concurrent_limit\",\"label\":\"Q4 · 并发审批上限取哪个值?\",\"type\":\"select\",\"required\":true,\"options\":[\"50(保守,资源占用低)\",\"200(宽松,预留增长)\",\"其他(请在备注中注明具体数字)\"],\"help\":\"需结合现有并发量与上线后预估峰值确定\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2b\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"建议在每一项旁边附一句简短理由(例如“为什么选 50 而不是 200”),方便后续评审追溯;交付后会按“审批系统合并 · 决策交接单”模板汇总给 IT、预算与排期负责人。\"},{\"id\":\"n2c\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"submit\",\"label\":\"提交四项决定\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"save_draft\",\"label\":\"暂存草稿\",\"style\":\"default\"}]}]}]}",
"valid_first": true,
"errors_first": [],
"stats_first": {
"nodes": 7,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"section",
"markdown",
"kv",
"section",
"form",
"markdown",
"actions"
],
"refsUsed": [
"req:eval/ri-06/context",
"req:eval/ri-06/open"
],
"unknownRefs": []
},
"repaired": false,
"valid_final": true,
"errors_final": [],
"spec": {
"title": "审批系统合并 · 待决问题一次性收集",
"nodes": [
{
"id": "n1",
"type": "section",
"title": "项目背景速览",
"children": [
{
"id": "n1a",
"type": "markdown",
"markdown": "本页用于一次性收齐四个待决项,所有题均为必填。提交后会作为后续预算细分、上线排期与干系人对齐的依据。"
},
{
"id": "n1b",
"type": "kv",
"kv": [
[
"预算上限",
"40 万"
],
[
"上线目标",
"Q1"
],
[
"审批链上限",
"5 级"
],
[
"移动端入口",
"保留"
],
[
"历史数据",
"只读归档"
],
[
"财务",
"审批人"
],
[
"行政",
"发起人"
],
[
"IT",
"运维"
],
[
"法务",
"合同事后复核"
]
],
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-06/context"
]
}
]
},
{
"id": "n2",
"type": "section",
"title": "四个待决问题(全部必填)",
"children": [
{
"id": "n2a",
"type": "form",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-06/open"
],
"fields": [
{
"key": "shutdown_window_cross_quarter",
"label": "Q1 · 旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度?",
"type": "select",
"required": true,
"options": [
"允许跨季度",
"不允许(必须在本季度内完成)",
"需进一步与 IT/财务讨论"
],
"help": "影响并行期运维成本与数据迁移节奏"
},
{
"key": "acceptance_signer",
"label": "Q2 · 验收标准由谁签署?",
"type": "select",
"required": true,
"options": [
"财务",
"行政",
"财务 + 行政 联合签署"
],
"help": "财务为审批人,行政为发起人,最终签字方尚未指定"
},
{
"key": "vendor_on_site",
"label": "Q3 · 供应商是否要求驻场实施?",
"type": "select",
"required": true,
"options": [
"要求全驻场",
"要求部分驻场(仅关键节点)",
"不需要驻场(远程实施)"
],
"help": "决定预算内是否需要预留差旅与场地费用"
},
{
"key": "concurrent_limit",
"label": "Q4 · 并发审批上限取哪个值?",
"type": "select",
"required": true,
"options": [
"50(保守,资源占用低)",
"200(宽松,预留增长)",
"其他(请在备注中注明具体数字)"
],
"help": "需结合现有并发量与上线后预估峰值确定"
}
]
},
{
"id": "n2b",
"type": "markdown",
"markdown": "建议在每一项旁边附一句简短理由(例如“为什么选 50 而不是 200”),方便后续评审追溯;交付后会按“审批系统合并 · 决策交接单”模板汇总给 IT、预算与排期负责人。"
},
{
"id": "n2c",
"type": "actions",
"actions": [
{
"id": "submit",
"label": "提交四项决定",
"style": "primary"
},
{
"id": "save_draft",
"label": "暂存草稿",
"style": "default"
}
]
}
]
}
]
},
"stats_final": {
"nodes": 7,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"section",
"markdown",
"kv",
"section",
"form",
"markdown",
"actions"
],
"refsUsed": [
"req:eval/ri-06/context",
"req:eval/ri-06/open"
],
"idsProvided": 7
},
"wall_s": 42.3
}
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
+189
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,189 @@
{
"task": "ri-09",
"family": "requirement-input",
"arm": "G",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "collect",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 3612,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 976,
"completion_tokens": 2636,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"reasoning_tokens": 2145
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 128
}
},
"latency_s": 17.39
}
],
"callCount": 1,
"raw_first": "{\"title\":\"待决问题收集表\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"项目背景摘要\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-08/context\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-08/context\"],\"kv\":[[\"目标\",\"合并两套并行审批系统为一套\"],[\"预算上限\",\"40 万\"],[\"期望上线\",\"Q1\"],[\"干系人\",\"财务(审批人)/ 行政(发起人)/ IT(运维)/ 法务(事后复核合同)\"],[\"已定约束\",\"保留移动端入口;审批链最多 5 级;历史数据只读归档\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"请填写以下待决问题\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-08/open\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"form\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-08/open\"],\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"legacy_cutover_cross_quarter\",\"label\":\"旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度?\",\"type\":\"boolean\",\"required\":true,\"help\":\"默认建议不允许跨季度;如选是请在备注补充理由\"},{\"key\":\"archive_years\",\"label\":\"归档年限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"3 年\",\"5 年\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"需结合合规要求与存储成本综合评估\"},{\"key\":\"vendor_onsite_required\",\"label\":\"供应商是否要求驻场实施?\",\"type\":\"boolean\",\"required\":true,\"help\":\"如选是,请补充驻场人数与周期\"},{\"key\":\"paper_fallback_required\",\"label\":\"是否需要纸质兜底流程?\",\"type\":\"boolean\",\"required\":true,\"help\":\"存在分歧:行政坚持需要,IT 反对;请注明最终决策与依据\"},{\"key\":\"remarks\",\"label\":\"其他补充说明\",\"type\":\"textarea\",\"required\":false,\"placeholder\":\"如有附加约束、例外或备注,请在此说明\"}]}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"提示:纸质兜底与跨季度下线两项干系人分歧较大,建议收集完后再单独组织一次评审拍板,避免在本表内反复拉扯。\"},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"submit_decisions\",\"label\":\"提交决策\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"save_draft\",\"label\":\"保存草稿\",\"style\":\"default\"}]}]}",
"valid_first": true,
"errors_first": [],
"stats_first": {
"nodes": 6,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"section",
"kv",
"section",
"form",
"markdown",
"actions"
],
"refsUsed": [
"req:eval/ri-08/context",
"req:eval/ri-08/open"
],
"unknownRefs": []
},
"repaired": false,
"valid_final": true,
"errors_final": [],
"spec": {
"title": "待决问题收集表",
"nodes": [
{
"id": "n1",
"type": "section",
"title": "项目背景摘要",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-08/context"
],
"children": [
{
"id": "n1a",
"type": "kv",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-08/context"
],
"kv": [
[
"目标",
"合并两套并行审批系统为一套"
],
[
"预算上限",
"40 万"
],
[
"期望上线",
"Q1"
],
[
"干系人",
"财务(审批人)/ 行政(发起人)/ IT(运维)/ 法务(事后复核合同)"
],
[
"已定约束",
"保留移动端入口;审批链最多 5 级;历史数据只读归档"
]
]
}
]
},
{
"id": "n2",
"type": "section",
"title": "请填写以下待决问题",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-08/open"
],
"children": [
{
"id": "n2a",
"type": "form",
"source": [
"req:eval/ri-08/open"
],
"fields": [
{
"key": "legacy_cutover_cross_quarter",
"label": "旧系统下线窗口是否允许跨季度?",
"type": "boolean",
"required": true,
"help": "默认建议不允许跨季度;如选是请在备注补充理由"
},
{
"key": "archive_years",
"label": "归档年限",
"type": "select",
"options": [
"3 年",
"5 年"
],
"required": true,
"help": "需结合合规要求与存储成本综合评估"
},
{
"key": "vendor_onsite_required",
"label": "供应商是否要求驻场实施?",
"type": "boolean",
"required": true,
"help": "如选是,请补充驻场人数与周期"
},
{
"key": "paper_fallback_required",
"label": "是否需要纸质兜底流程?",
"type": "boolean",
"required": true,
"help": "存在分歧:行政坚持需要,IT 反对;请注明最终决策与依据"
},
{
"key": "remarks",
"label": "其他补充说明",
"type": "textarea",
"required": false,
"placeholder": "如有附加约束、例外或备注,请在此说明"
}
]
}
]
},
{
"id": "n3",
"type": "markdown",
"markdown": "提示:纸质兜底与跨季度下线两项干系人分歧较大,建议收集完后再单独组织一次评审拍板,避免在本表内反复拉扯。"
},
{
"id": "n4",
"type": "actions",
"actions": [
{
"id": "submit_decisions",
"label": "提交决策",
"style": "primary"
},
{
"id": "save_draft",
"label": "保存草稿",
"style": "default"
}
]
}
]
},
"stats_final": {
"nodes": 6,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"section",
"kv",
"section",
"form",
"markdown",
"actions"
],
"refsUsed": [
"req:eval/ri-08/context",
"req:eval/ri-08/open"
],
"idsProvided": 6
},
"wall_s": 17.4
}
+51
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
{
"task": "ri-10",
"family": "requirement-input",
"arm": "G",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "confirm",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 5500,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 972,
"completion_tokens": 4528,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 128
}
},
"latency_s": 41.74
},
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 6413,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 1021,
"completion_tokens": 5392,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"reasoning_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 768
}
},
"latency_s": 42.12
}
],
"callCount": 2,
"raw_first": "{\"title\":\"审批系统合并项目 · 范围确认页\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"项目背景\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/context\"],\"kv\":[[\"合并目标\",\"将两套并行内部审批系统合并为一套\"],[\"预算上限\",\"40 万元\"],[\"上线目标\",\"Q1\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"干系人\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/context\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"avatar\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/context\"],\"avatar\":{\"name\":\"财务\",\"sub\":\"审批人\",\"tone\":\"info\"}},{\"id\":\"n2b\",\"type\":\"avatar\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/context\"],\"avatar\":{\"name\":\"行政\",\"sub\":\"发起人\",\"tone\":\"info\"}},{\"id\":\"n2c\",\"type\":\"avatar\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/context\"],\"avatar\":{\"name\":\"IT\",\"sub\":\"运维\",\"tone\":\"info\"}},{\"id\":\"n2d\",\"type\":\"avatar\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/context\"],\"avatar\":{\"name\":\"法务\",\"sub\":\"合同事后复核\",\"tone\":\"info\"}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"已定约束\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/context\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"list\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/context\"],\"items\":[\"保留移动端入口\",\"审批链最多 5 级\",\"历史数据只读归档\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"待决事项需要逐项拍板。归档年限影响存储成本与合规暴露面;并发上限影响架构容量与压测设计;纸质兜底是连续性与流程负担的争议点;供应商是否驻场直接影响预算与人天安排。建议先看下一节一览,再进入表单逐项确认。\"},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"待决事项一览\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/open\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n5a\",\"type\":\"table\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/open\"],\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"topic\",\"label\":\"议题\"},{\"key\":\"options\",\"label\":\"备选\"},{\"key\":\"stance\",\"label\":\"当前立场\"}],\"rows\":[{\"cells\":[[\"topic\",\"归档年限\"],[\"options\",\"3 年 / 5 年\"],[\"stance\",\"未定\"]]},{\"cells\":[[\"topic\",\"并发审批上限\"],[\"options\",\"50 / 200\"],[\"stance\",\"未定\"]]},{\"cells\":[[\"topic\",\"纸质兜底流程\"],[\"options\",\"需要 / 不需要\"],[\"stance\",\"行政坚持;IT 反对\"]]},{\"cells\":[[\"topic\",\"供应商驻场实施\"],[\"options\",\"需要 / 不需要\"],[\"stance\",\"未定\"]]}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n6\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"逐项确认\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/open\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n6a\",\"type\":\"form\",\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/open\"],\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"retention_years\",\"label\":\"归档年限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"3 年\",\"5 年\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"历史数据只读归档的保留期限\"},{\"key\":\"concurrency_cap\",\"label\":\"并发审批上限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"50\",\"200\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"影响系统容量与压测设计\"},{\"key\":\"paper_fallback\",\"label\":\"是否保留纸质兜底流程\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"需要\",\"不需要\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"行政坚持,IT 反对,需最终拍板\"},{\"key\":\"vendor_onsite\",\"label\":\"供应商是否驻场实施\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"需要驻场\",\"远程实施\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"影响预算与人天安排\"}]}]},{\"id\":\"n7\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"确认与下一步\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n7a\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"confirm_scope\",\"label\":\"提交范围确认\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"revisit_constraints\",\"label\":\"修订已定约束\"},{\"id\":\"escalate_paper\",\"label\":\"升级争议项(纸质兜底)\",\"style\":\"danger\"}]}}]}",
"valid_first": false,
"errors_first": [
"JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 2593 (char 2592)"
],
"stats_first": null,
"raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"内部审批合并 · 范围确认页\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"项目背景与目标\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"合并对象\",\"两套并行审批系统 → 一套统一系统\"],[\"预算上限\",\"40 万\"],[\"目标上线\",\"Q1\"],[\"合同复核\",\"法务事后复核合同\"]],\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/context\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"干系人\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"list\",\"items\":[\"财务(审批人)\",\"行政(发起人)\",\"IT(运维)\",\"法务(合同复核,事后)\"],\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/context\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"已定约束(确认即可)\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"table\",\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"k\",\"label\":\"约束项\"},{\"key\":\"v\",\"label\":\"已定结论\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"r1\",\"cells\":[[\"k\",\"移动端入口\"],[\"v\",\"保留\"]]},{\"id\":\"r2\",\"cells\":[[\"k\",\"审批链最大层级\"],[\"v\",\"5 级\"]]},{\"id\":\"r3\",\"cells\":[[\"k\",\"历史数据\"],[\"v\",\"只读归档\"]]},{\"id\":\"r4\",\"cells\":[[\"k\",\"预算上限\"],[\"v\",\"40 万\"]]},{\"id\":\"r5\",\"cells\":[[\"k\",\"上线目标\"],[\"v\",\"Q1\"]]}]},\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/context\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"待决事项(逐项确认)\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"form\",\"fields\":[{\"key\":\"archive_years\",\"label\":\"归档年限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"3 年\",\"5 年\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"历史数据只读归档需存几年?候选 3 / 5。\",\"default\":\"3 年\"},{\"key\":\"concurrency_limit\",\"label\":\"并发审批上限\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"50\",\"200\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"系统同时处理审批的峰值能力。\",\"default\":\"50\"},{\"key\":\"paper_fallback\",\"label\":\"纸质兜底流程\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"需要(行政立场)\",\"不需要(IT 立场)\",\"折中:仅异常场景启用\"],\"required\":true,\"help\":\"行政坚持、IT 反对,需用户拍板。\",\"default\":\"折中:仅异常场景启用\"},{\"key\":\"vendor_onsite\",\"label\":\"供应商驻场实施\",\"type\":\"select\",\"options\":[\"必须驻场\",\"远程实施\",\"混合:关键节点驻场\"],\"required\":true,\"default\":\"混合:关键节点驻场\"}],\"source\":[\"req:eval/ri-09/open\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"确认操作\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n5a\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"a_confirm\",\"label\":\"确认已定 + 提交待决\",\"style\":\"primary\"},{\"id\":\"a_discuss\",\"label\":\"拉会讨论冲突项\",\"style\":\"default\"},{\"id\":\"a_revise\",\"label\":\"回退修订材料\",\"style\":\"danger\"}]}}]}",
"repaired": true,
"valid_final": false,
"errors_final": [
"JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 1850 (char 1849)"
],
"spec": null,
"wall_s": 83.9
}
+194
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,194 @@
{
"task": "to-01",
"family": "task-overview",
"arm": "G",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "progress",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 3011,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 1014,
"completion_tokens": 1997,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"reasoning_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 0
}
},
"latency_s": 13.98
}
],
"callCount": 1,
"raw_first": "{\"title\":\"任务进度:交付门禁自动化\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"当前进度\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-00/steps\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-00/steps\"],\"steps\":{\"current\":2,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"需求冻结\",\"status\":\"done\"},{\"label\":\"契约定义\",\"status\":\"done\"},{\"label\":\"存储迁移\",\"status\":\"active\"},{\"label\":\"灰度开关\",\"status\":\"pending\"},{\"label\":\"回退演练\",\"status\":\"pending\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"最近动态\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-00/log\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"timeline\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-00/log\"],\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"存储迁移脚本在预发跑通,耗时 14m\",\"time\":\"10-08 09:12\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"title\":\"灰度开关等待安全评审排期\",\"time\":\"10-09 15:40\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"回退演练草案提交,缺少数据校验步骤\",\"time\":\"10-10 11:05\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"契约定义评审通过,两处字段口径修订\",\"time\":\"10-11 10:30\",\"tone\":\"ok\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"产物\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-00/artifacts\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"list\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-00/artifacts\"],\"items\":[\"需求清单 v3\",\"迁移脚本 runbook\",\"评审纪要 10-11\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"下一步建议\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"基于当前状态,建议优先处理两件事:\\n\\n1. **推进灰度开关**:存储迁移已在预发跑通,安全评审排期是当前的关键瓶颈,建议主动跟进评审时间窗,避免在迁移完成后空等;\\n2. **补齐回退演练**:草案已提交但缺数据校验步骤,建议先补充校验用例与回退判定标准,再走评审。\\n\\n契约定义刚于 10-11 通过评审(含两处字段口径修订),建议先稳定观察一至两个发布周期,再启动灰度开关落地。\"}]}]}",
"valid_first": true,
"errors_first": [],
"stats_first": {
"nodes": 8,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"section",
"steps",
"section",
"timeline",
"section",
"list",
"section",
"markdown"
],
"refsUsed": [
"task:eval/to-00/artifacts",
"task:eval/to-00/log",
"task:eval/to-00/steps"
],
"unknownRefs": []
},
"repaired": false,
"valid_final": true,
"errors_final": [],
"spec": {
"title": "任务进度:交付门禁自动化",
"nodes": [
{
"id": "n1",
"type": "section",
"title": "当前进度",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-00/steps"
],
"children": [
{
"id": "n1a",
"type": "steps",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-00/steps"
],
"steps": {
"current": 2,
"steps": [
{
"label": "需求冻结",
"status": "done"
},
{
"label": "契约定义",
"status": "done"
},
{
"label": "存储迁移",
"status": "active"
},
{
"label": "灰度开关",
"status": "pending"
},
{
"label": "回退演练",
"status": "pending"
}
]
}
}
]
},
{
"id": "n2",
"type": "section",
"title": "最近动态",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-00/log"
],
"children": [
{
"id": "n2a",
"type": "timeline",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-00/log"
],
"timeline": {
"items": [
{
"title": "存储迁移脚本在预发跑通,耗时 14m",
"time": "10-08 09:12",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"title": "灰度开关等待安全评审排期",
"time": "10-09 15:40",
"tone": "warn"
},
{
"title": "回退演练草案提交,缺少数据校验步骤",
"time": "10-10 11:05",
"tone": "warn"
},
{
"title": "契约定义评审通过,两处字段口径修订",
"time": "10-11 10:30",
"tone": "ok"
}
]
}
}
]
},
{
"id": "n3",
"type": "section",
"title": "产物",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-00/artifacts"
],
"children": [
{
"id": "n3a",
"type": "list",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-00/artifacts"
],
"items": [
"需求清单 v3",
"迁移脚本 runbook",
"评审纪要 10-11"
]
}
]
},
{
"id": "n4",
"type": "section",
"title": "下一步建议",
"children": [
{
"id": "n4a",
"type": "markdown",
"markdown": "基于当前状态,建议优先处理两件事:\n\n1. **推进灰度开关**:存储迁移已在预发跑通,安全评审排期是当前的关键瓶颈,建议主动跟进评审时间窗,避免在迁移完成后空等;\n2. **补齐回退演练**:草案已提交但缺数据校验步骤,建议先补充校验用例与回退判定标准,再走评审。\n\n契约定义刚于 10-11 通过评审(含两处字段口径修订),建议先稳定观察一至两个发布周期,再启动灰度开关落地。"
}
]
}
]
},
"stats_final": {
"nodes": 8,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"section",
"steps",
"section",
"timeline",
"section",
"list",
"section",
"markdown"
],
"refsUsed": [
"task:eval/to-00/artifacts",
"task:eval/to-00/log",
"task:eval/to-00/steps"
],
"idsProvided": 8
},
"wall_s": 14.0
}
+242
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,242 @@
{
"task": "to-02",
"family": "task-overview",
"arm": "G",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "risk",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 5191,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 1020,
"completion_tokens": 4171,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 802
}
},
"latency_s": 40.84
},
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 5001,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 1067,
"completion_tokens": 3934,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 802
}
},
"latency_s": 32.65
}
],
"callCount": 2,
"raw_first": "{\"title\":\"交付门禁自动化 · 风险与欠账视图\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"进度概览\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/steps\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/steps\"],\"steps\":{\"current\":2,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"需求冻结\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"契约定义\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"存储迁移\",\"status\":\"active\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"label\":\"灰度开关\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"label\":\"回退演练\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"danger\"}]}},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"当前仅 `存储迁移` 进行中,其余两项交付动作处于待启动状态;`灰度开关` 与 `回退演练` 均有外部依赖或前置条件未满足。\"}}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"风险登记\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/steps\",\"task:eval/to-01/log\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"table\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/steps\",\"task:eval/to-01/log\"],\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"item\",\"label\":\"风险项\"},{\"key\":\"severity\",\"label\":\"严重度\"},{\"key\":\"evidence\",\"label\":\"事实依据\"},{\"key\":\"status\",\"label\":\"当前状态\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"r1\",\"cells\":[[\"item\",\"灰度开关被安全评审排期阻塞\"],[\"severity\",\"高\"],[\"evidence\",\"10-09 安全评审未排期\"],[\"status\",\"未解除\"]]},{\"id\":\"r2\",\"cells\":[[\"item\",\"回退演练缺数据校验步骤\"],[\"severity\",\"高\"],[\"evidence\",\"10-10 草案被指出缺失\"],[\"status\",\"未补齐\"]]},{\"id\":\"r3\",\"cells\":[[\"item\",\"存储迁移仅完成预发验证\"],[\"severity\",\"中\"],[\"evidence\",\"10-08 预发跑通 14m,未见生产执行\"],[\"status\",\"进行中\"]]},{\"id\":\"r4\",\"cells\":[[\"item\",\"契约两处字段口径修订,回灌未确认\"],[\"severity\",\"中\"],[\"evidence\",\"10-11 评审通过同时修订两处\"],[\"status\",\"已落地待回归\"]]}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"欠账清单\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/log\",\"task:eval/to-01/artifacts\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"list\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/log\"],\"items\":[\"回退演练草案缺少数据校验步骤(10-10 提交版)\",\"灰度开关自 10-09 起等待安全评审排期,未确认窗口\",\"存储迁移缺生产环境执行记录,仅停留在预发验证\",\"契约定义 10-11 两处字段口径修订,未见对需求清单 v3 与迁移脚本 runbook 的回灌确认\",\"现有产物仅 3 份:需求清单 v3、迁移脚本 runbook、评审纪要 10-11,回退方案与数据校验单尚未形成正式 doc\"]}]}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"最近动态\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/log\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"timeline\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/log\"],\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"存储迁移脚本预发跑通,耗时 14m\",\"time\":\"10-08 09:12\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"title\":\"灰度开关等待安全评审排期\",\"time\":\"10-09 15:40\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"回退演练草案提交,缺数据校验步骤\",\"time\":\"10-10 11:05\",\"tone\":\"danger\"},{\"title\":\"契约定义评审通过,两处字段口径修订\",\"time\":\"10-11 10:30\",\"tone\":\"info\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"建议下一步(推断)\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n5a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**优先解除阻断(高风险两项)**\\n1. 推动安全评审排期,把 `灰度开关` 从 pending 推到 active,否则灰度路径不可启动。\\n2. 在回退演练草案中补齐 `数据校验步骤`,重提评审;这是交付门禁中失败代价最高的一环。\\n\\n**回灌与回归(口径漂移)**\\n3. 将 10-11 评审通过的两处字段口径修订回灌到 `需求清单 v3`、`迁移脚本 runbook`,并在评审纪要 10-11 中追加变更说明。\\n\\n**推进收口**\\n4. 安排存储迁移在生产环境执行窗口,并补齐生产执行的产物(执行报告、回放校验)。\\n\\n**观察**\\n- 风险登记中最久未更新的信号是 10-09 的安全评审,已 2 天未推进,需要主动升级。\\n- 当前产物偏轻,正式 doc 只有 3 份,建议把回退 runbook 与数据校验单也固化为 doc 产物。\"}}]}]}",
"valid_first": false,
"errors_first": [
"JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 571 (char 570)"
],
"stats_first": null,
"raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"交付门禁自动化 · 风险与欠账视图\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"任务概览\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/steps\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/steps\"],\"kv\":[[\"当前任务\",\"交付门禁自动化\"],[\"步骤总数\",\"5\"],[\"已完成\",\"2\"],[\"进行中\",\"1\"],[\"待开始\",\"2\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"步骤进度\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/steps\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/steps\"],\"steps\":{\"current\":2,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"需求冻结\",\"status\":\"done\"},{\"label\":\"契约定义\",\"status\":\"done\"},{\"label\":\"存储迁移\",\"status\":\"active\"},{\"label\":\"灰度开关\",\"status\":\"pending\"},{\"label\":\"回退演练\",\"status\":\"pending\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"风险时间线\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/log\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"timeline\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/log\"],\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"存储迁移脚本预发跑通\",\"time\":\"10-08 09:12\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"markdown\":\"耗时 14m\"},{\"title\":\"灰度开关等待安全评审排期\",\"time\":\"10-09 15:40\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"markdown\":\"评审尚未排期,是链路上的主要阻塞点\"},{\"title\":\"回退演练草案提交\",\"time\":\"10-10 11:05\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"markdown\":\"缺少数据校验步骤\"},{\"title\":\"契约定义评审通过\",\"time\":\"10-11 10:30\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"markdown\":\"同步修订两处字段口径\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"欠账与阻塞\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"综合判断:任务尚未过期,但存在三个明确欠账,按阻塞程度排序如下——\\n\\n1. 灰度开关等待安全评审——是链路上的卡点,没有评审排期就无法开启灰度,会影响整体节奏。\\n2. 回退演练缺数据校验——已知缺口,回退流程尚未闭环。\\n3. 存储迁移状态未关闭——虽已预发跑通,但步骤仍处于 in_progress,需持续关注进度。\\n\\n建议:优先催办安全评审排期,并在回退演练草案中补齐数据校验步骤。\"},{\"id\":\"n4b\",\"type\":\"list\",\"items\":[\"灰度开关:等待安全评审排期,无明确 ETA\",\"回退演练:缺数据校验步骤\",\"存储迁移:状态仍为 in_progress,未关闭\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"产物索引\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/artifacts\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n5a\",\"type\":\"list\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-01/artifacts\"],\"items\":[\"需求清单 v3(doc)\",\"迁移脚本 runbook(doc)\",\"评审纪要 10-11(doc)\"]}]}]}",
"repaired": true,
"valid_final": true,
"errors_final": [],
"spec": {
"title": "交付门禁自动化 · 风险与欠账视图",
"nodes": [
{
"id": "n1",
"type": "section",
"title": "任务概览",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-01/steps"
],
"children": [
{
"id": "n1a",
"type": "kv",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-01/steps"
],
"kv": [
[
"当前任务",
"交付门禁自动化"
],
[
"步骤总数",
"5"
],
[
"已完成",
"2"
],
[
"进行中",
"1"
],
[
"待开始",
"2"
]
]
}
]
},
{
"id": "n2",
"type": "section",
"title": "步骤进度",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-01/steps"
],
"children": [
{
"id": "n2a",
"type": "steps",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-01/steps"
],
"steps": {
"current": 2,
"steps": [
{
"label": "需求冻结",
"status": "done"
},
{
"label": "契约定义",
"status": "done"
},
{
"label": "存储迁移",
"status": "active"
},
{
"label": "灰度开关",
"status": "pending"
},
{
"label": "回退演练",
"status": "pending"
}
]
}
}
]
},
{
"id": "n3",
"type": "section",
"title": "风险时间线",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-01/log"
],
"children": [
{
"id": "n3a",
"type": "timeline",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-01/log"
],
"timeline": {
"items": [
{
"title": "存储迁移脚本预发跑通",
"time": "10-08 09:12",
"tone": "ok",
"markdown": "耗时 14m"
},
{
"title": "灰度开关等待安全评审排期",
"time": "10-09 15:40",
"tone": "warn",
"markdown": "评审尚未排期,是链路上的主要阻塞点"
},
{
"title": "回退演练草案提交",
"time": "10-10 11:05",
"tone": "warn",
"markdown": "缺少数据校验步骤"
},
{
"title": "契约定义评审通过",
"time": "10-11 10:30",
"tone": "ok",
"markdown": "同步修订两处字段口径"
}
]
}
}
]
},
{
"id": "n4",
"type": "section",
"title": "欠账与阻塞",
"children": [
{
"id": "n4a",
"type": "markdown",
"markdown": "综合判断:任务尚未过期,但存在三个明确欠账,按阻塞程度排序如下——\n\n1. 灰度开关等待安全评审——是链路上的卡点,没有评审排期就无法开启灰度,会影响整体节奏。\n2. 回退演练缺数据校验——已知缺口,回退流程尚未闭环。\n3. 存储迁移状态未关闭——虽已预发跑通,但步骤仍处于 in_progress,需持续关注进度。\n\n建议:优先催办安全评审排期,并在回退演练草案中补齐数据校验步骤。"
},
{
"id": "n4b",
"type": "list",
"items": [
"灰度开关:等待安全评审排期,无明确 ETA",
"回退演练:缺数据校验步骤",
"存储迁移:状态仍为 in_progress,未关闭"
]
}
]
},
{
"id": "n5",
"type": "section",
"title": "产物索引",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-01/artifacts"
],
"children": [
{
"id": "n5a",
"type": "list",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-01/artifacts"
],
"items": [
"需求清单 v3(doc)",
"迁移脚本 runbook(doc)",
"评审纪要 10-11(doc)"
]
}
]
}
]
},
"stats_final": {
"nodes": 11,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"section",
"kv",
"section",
"steps",
"section",
"timeline",
"section",
"markdown",
"list",
"section",
"list"
],
"refsUsed": [
"task:eval/to-01/artifacts",
"task:eval/to-01/log",
"task:eval/to-01/steps"
],
"idsProvided": 11
},
"wall_s": 73.5
}
+261
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
{
"task": "to-03",
"family": "task-overview",
"arm": "G",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "handover",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 3416,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 1019,
"completion_tokens": 2397,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"reasoning_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 768
}
},
"latency_s": 22.37
}
],
"callCount": 1,
"raw_first": "{\"title\":\"交接页:交付门禁自动化\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"任务背景\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-02/artifacts\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"目标是把当前人工执行的交付门禁流程改造为可灰度、可回退的自动化链路。已沉淀需求清单、迁移 runbook 与 10-11 评审纪要三份产物,供接手人快速建立上下文。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"当前进度\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-02/steps\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"steps\":{\"current\":2,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"需求冻结\",\"status\":\"done\"},{\"label\":\"契约定义\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"存储迁移\",\"status\":\"active\"},{\"label\":\"灰度开关\",\"status\":\"pending\"},{\"label\":\"回退演练\",\"status\":\"pending\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"最近动态\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-02/log\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"timeline\",\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"存储迁移脚本预发跑通\",\"time\":\"10-08 09:12\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"markdown\":\"耗时 14 分钟\"},{\"title\":\"灰度开关等待安全评审排期\",\"time\":\"10-09 15:40\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"markdown\":\"阻塞项\"},{\"title\":\"回退演练草案提交\",\"time\":\"10-10 11:05\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"markdown\":\"缺少数据校验步骤\"},{\"title\":\"契约定义评审通过\",\"time\":\"10-11 10:30\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"markdown\":\"两处字段口径已修订\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"状态判断\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**进展面**:前两步已正式关闭,存储迁移在预发环境验证通过,契约字段口径已与评审结论对齐。\\n\\n**风险面**:灰度开关卡在安全评审排期,回退演练草案缺数据校验步骤,存在“先发后补”风险。建议优先补齐回退演练再推动灰度窗口。\\n\\n**接手优先级**:① 补全回退演练 → ② 推动安全评审 → ③ 推进存储迁移上生产。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"接手事项\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n5a\",\"type\":\"list\",\"items\":[\"跟进存储迁移从预发推进到生产,关注耗时波动与回滚条件\",\"推动灰度开关的安全评审排期,准备评审材料与开关策略说明\",\"补齐回退演练中的数据校验步骤,重新提交方案\",\"对照需求清单 v3 与最新契约,确认字段口径一致\",\"跟进 10-11 评审纪要中两处字段口径修订的落地情况\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n6\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"相关产物\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-02/artifacts\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n6a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"kv\":[[\"需求清单\",\"v3(doc)\"],[\"迁移脚本\",\"runbook(doc)\"],[\"评审纪要\",\"10-11(doc)\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"n7\",\"type\":\"actions\",\"actions\":[{\"id\":\"a1\",\"label\":\"查看需求清单 v3\"},{\"id\":\"a2\",\"label\":\"查看迁移 runbook\"},{\"id\":\"a3\",\"label\":\"查看 10-11 评审纪要\",\"style\":\"primary\"}]}]}",
"valid_first": true,
"errors_first": [],
"stats_first": {
"nodes": 13,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"section",
"markdown",
"section",
"steps",
"section",
"timeline",
"section",
"markdown",
"section",
"list",
"section",
"kv",
"actions"
],
"refsUsed": [
"task:eval/to-02/artifacts",
"task:eval/to-02/log",
"task:eval/to-02/steps"
],
"unknownRefs": []
},
"repaired": false,
"valid_final": true,
"errors_final": [],
"spec": {
"title": "交接页:交付门禁自动化",
"nodes": [
{
"id": "n1",
"type": "section",
"title": "任务背景",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-02/artifacts"
],
"children": [
{
"id": "n1a",
"type": "markdown",
"markdown": "目标是把当前人工执行的交付门禁流程改造为可灰度、可回退的自动化链路。已沉淀需求清单、迁移 runbook 与 10-11 评审纪要三份产物,供接手人快速建立上下文。"
}
]
},
{
"id": "n2",
"type": "section",
"title": "当前进度",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-02/steps"
],
"children": [
{
"id": "n2a",
"type": "steps",
"steps": {
"current": 2,
"steps": [
{
"label": "需求冻结",
"status": "done"
},
{
"label": "契约定义",
"status": "done",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"label": "存储迁移",
"status": "active"
},
{
"label": "灰度开关",
"status": "pending"
},
{
"label": "回退演练",
"status": "pending"
}
]
}
}
]
},
{
"id": "n3",
"type": "section",
"title": "最近动态",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-02/log"
],
"children": [
{
"id": "n3a",
"type": "timeline",
"timeline": {
"items": [
{
"title": "存储迁移脚本预发跑通",
"time": "10-08 09:12",
"tone": "ok",
"markdown": "耗时 14 分钟"
},
{
"title": "灰度开关等待安全评审排期",
"time": "10-09 15:40",
"tone": "warn",
"markdown": "阻塞项"
},
{
"title": "回退演练草案提交",
"time": "10-10 11:05",
"tone": "warn",
"markdown": "缺少数据校验步骤"
},
{
"title": "契约定义评审通过",
"time": "10-11 10:30",
"tone": "ok",
"markdown": "两处字段口径已修订"
}
]
}
}
]
},
{
"id": "n4",
"type": "section",
"title": "状态判断",
"children": [
{
"id": "n4a",
"type": "markdown",
"markdown": "**进展面**:前两步已正式关闭,存储迁移在预发环境验证通过,契约字段口径已与评审结论对齐。\n\n**风险面**:灰度开关卡在安全评审排期,回退演练草案缺数据校验步骤,存在“先发后补”风险。建议优先补齐回退演练再推动灰度窗口。\n\n**接手优先级**:① 补全回退演练 → ② 推动安全评审 → ③ 推进存储迁移上生产。"
}
]
},
{
"id": "n5",
"type": "section",
"title": "接手事项",
"children": [
{
"id": "n5a",
"type": "list",
"items": [
"跟进存储迁移从预发推进到生产,关注耗时波动与回滚条件",
"推动灰度开关的安全评审排期,准备评审材料与开关策略说明",
"补齐回退演练中的数据校验步骤,重新提交方案",
"对照需求清单 v3 与最新契约,确认字段口径一致",
"跟进 10-11 评审纪要中两处字段口径修订的落地情况"
]
}
]
},
{
"id": "n6",
"type": "section",
"title": "相关产物",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-02/artifacts"
],
"children": [
{
"id": "n6a",
"type": "kv",
"kv": [
[
"需求清单",
"v3(doc)"
],
[
"迁移脚本",
"runbook(doc)"
],
[
"评审纪要",
"10-11(doc)"
]
]
}
]
},
{
"id": "n7",
"type": "actions",
"actions": [
{
"id": "a1",
"label": "查看需求清单 v3"
},
{
"id": "a2",
"label": "查看迁移 runbook"
},
{
"id": "a3",
"label": "查看 10-11 评审纪要",
"style": "primary"
}
]
}
]
},
"stats_final": {
"nodes": 13,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"section",
"markdown",
"section",
"steps",
"section",
"timeline",
"section",
"markdown",
"section",
"list",
"section",
"kv",
"actions"
],
"refsUsed": [
"task:eval/to-02/artifacts",
"task:eval/to-02/log",
"task:eval/to-02/steps"
],
"idsProvided": 13
},
"wall_s": 22.4
}
+219
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,219 @@
{
"task": "to-04",
"family": "task-overview",
"arm": "G",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "progress",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 2674,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 1014,
"completion_tokens": 1660,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 802
}
},
"latency_s": 15.93
},
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 4173,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 1057,
"completion_tokens": 3116,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 807
}
},
"latency_s": 29.12
}
],
"callCount": 2,
"raw_first": "{\"title\":\"交付门禁自动化 · 进度概览\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n0\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"当前卡在 **存储迁移**(进行中,预发已跑通 14m),下一步推进 **灰度开关**(待安全评审排期);**回退演练** 草案虽已提交,但缺数据校验步骤,建议先补齐再排正式演练。\"},{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"步骤状态\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-03/steps\"],\"steps\":{\"current\":2,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"需求冻结\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"契约定义\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"存储迁移\",\"status\":\"active\",\"tone\":\"info\"},{\"label\":\"灰度开关\",\"status\":\"pending\"},{\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"label\":\"回退演练\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"warn\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"最近动态\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"timeline\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-03/log\"],\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"存储迁移脚本在预发跑通\",\"time\":\"10-08 09:12\",\"markdown\":\"耗时 14m\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"title\":\"灰度开关等待安全评审排期\",\"time\":\"10-09 15:40\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"回退演练草案提交\",\"time\":\"10-10 11:05\",\"markdown\":\"缺少数据校验步骤\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"契约定义评审通过\",\"time\":\"10-11 10:30\",\"markdown\":\"两处字段口径修订\",\"tone\":\"ok\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"产物\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n6\",\"type\":\"list\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-03/artifacts\"],\"items\":[\"需求清单 v3\",\"迁移脚本 runbook\",\"评审纪要 10-11\"]}]}]}",
"valid_first": false,
"errors_first": [
"$/child: steps 需非空、current 在范围内、status 合法"
],
"stats_first": {
"nodes": 7,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"markdown",
"section",
"steps",
"section",
"timeline",
"section",
"list"
],
"refsUsed": [
"task:eval/to-03/artifacts",
"task:eval/to-03/log",
"task:eval/to-03/steps"
],
"unknownRefs": []
},
"raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"交付门禁自动化 · 进度概览\",\"nodes\":[{\"type\":\"section\",\"id\":\"n1\",\"title\":\"进度\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-03/steps\"],\"children\":[{\"type\":\"steps\",\"id\":\"n1a\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-03/steps\"],\"steps\":{\"current\":2,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"需求冻结\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"契约定义\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"存储迁移\",\"status\":\"active\"},{\"label\":\"灰度开关\",\"status\":\"pending\"},{\"label\":\"回退演练\",\"status\":\"pending\"}]}},{\"type\":\"progress\",\"id\":\"n1b\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-03/steps\"],\"progress\":{\"label\":\"整体完成度\",\"value\":0.4}}]},{\"type\":\"section\",\"id\":\"n2\",\"title\":\"下一步\",\"children\":[{\"type\":\"markdown\",\"id\":\"n2a\",\"markdown\":\"当前卡在 **存储迁移**(脚本已预发跑通 14m)。两项待推动:① **灰度开关** 等安全评审排期;② **回退演练** 草案需补齐数据校验步骤。\"}]},{\"type\":\"section\",\"id\":\"n3\",\"title\":\"最近动态\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-03/log\"],\"children\":[{\"type\":\"timeline\",\"id\":\"n3a\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-03/log\"],\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"存储迁移脚本在预发跑通,耗时 14m\",\"time\":\"10-08 09:12\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"title\":\"灰度开关等待安全评审排期\",\"time\":\"10-09 15:40\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"回退演练草案提交,缺少数据校验步骤\",\"time\":\"10-10 11:05\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"契约定义评审通过,两处字段口径修订\",\"time\":\"10-11 10:30\",\"tone\":\"ok\"}]}}]},{\"type\":\"section\",\"id\":\"n4\",\"title\":\"产物\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-03/artifacts\"],\"children\":[{\"type\":\"list\",\"id\":\"n4a\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-03/artifacts\"],\"items\":[\"需求清单 v3\",\"迁移脚本 runbook\",\"评审纪要 10-11\"]}]}]}",
"repaired": true,
"valid_final": true,
"errors_final": [],
"spec": {
"title": "交付门禁自动化 · 进度概览",
"nodes": [
{
"type": "section",
"id": "n1",
"title": "进度",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-03/steps"
],
"children": [
{
"type": "steps",
"id": "n1a",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-03/steps"
],
"steps": {
"current": 2,
"steps": [
{
"label": "需求冻结",
"status": "done",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"label": "契约定义",
"status": "done",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"label": "存储迁移",
"status": "active"
},
{
"label": "灰度开关",
"status": "pending"
},
{
"label": "回退演练",
"status": "pending"
}
]
}
},
{
"type": "progress",
"id": "n1b",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-03/steps"
],
"progress": {
"label": "整体完成度",
"value": 0.4
}
}
]
},
{
"type": "section",
"id": "n2",
"title": "下一步",
"children": [
{
"type": "markdown",
"id": "n2a",
"markdown": "当前卡在 **存储迁移**(脚本已预发跑通 14m)。两项待推动:① **灰度开关** 等安全评审排期;② **回退演练** 草案需补齐数据校验步骤。"
}
]
},
{
"type": "section",
"id": "n3",
"title": "最近动态",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-03/log"
],
"children": [
{
"type": "timeline",
"id": "n3a",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-03/log"
],
"timeline": {
"items": [
{
"title": "存储迁移脚本在预发跑通,耗时 14m",
"time": "10-08 09:12",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"title": "灰度开关等待安全评审排期",
"time": "10-09 15:40",
"tone": "warn"
},
{
"title": "回退演练草案提交,缺少数据校验步骤",
"time": "10-10 11:05",
"tone": "warn"
},
{
"title": "契约定义评审通过,两处字段口径修订",
"time": "10-11 10:30",
"tone": "ok"
}
]
}
}
]
},
{
"type": "section",
"id": "n4",
"title": "产物",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-03/artifacts"
],
"children": [
{
"type": "list",
"id": "n4a",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-03/artifacts"
],
"items": [
"需求清单 v3",
"迁移脚本 runbook",
"评审纪要 10-11"
]
}
]
}
]
},
"stats_final": {
"nodes": 9,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"section",
"steps",
"progress",
"section",
"markdown",
"section",
"timeline",
"section",
"list"
],
"refsUsed": [
"task:eval/to-03/artifacts",
"task:eval/to-03/log",
"task:eval/to-03/steps"
],
"idsProvided": 9
},
"wall_s": 45.0
}
+340
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,340 @@
{
"task": "to-05",
"family": "task-overview",
"arm": "G",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "risk",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 7611,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 1020,
"completion_tokens": 6591,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"reasoning_tokens": 5698
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 128
}
},
"latency_s": 30.5
}
],
"callCount": 1,
"raw_first": "{\"title\":\"交付门禁自动化 · 风险与欠账视图\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"进度概览\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-04/steps\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-04/steps\"],\"steps\":{\"current\":2,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"需求冻结\",\"status\":\"done\"},{\"label\":\"契约定义\",\"status\":\"done\"},{\"label\":\"存储迁移\",\"status\":\"active\"},{\"label\":\"灰度开关\",\"status\":\"pending\"},{\"label\":\"回退演练\",\"status\":\"pending\"}]}},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"type\":\"progress\",\"progress\":{\"label\":\"整体完成度\",\"value\":0.4}}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"风险地图(按严重度)\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-04/log\",\"task:eval/to-04/steps\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"tree\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-04/log\",\"task:eval/to-04/steps\"],\"tree\":{\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"risk1\",\"label\":\"灰度开关阻塞:等待安全评审排期\",\"tone\":\"danger\",\"badge\":\"P0\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"risk1a\",\"label\":\"自 10-09 起排期未启动,阻塞灰度与上线推进\",\"tone\":\"warn\"}]},{\"id\":\"risk2\",\"label\":\"回退演练不完整:草案缺数据校验步骤\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"badge\":\"P1\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"risk2a\",\"label\":\"10-10 草案已提交,需补齐校验脚本与对账口径\",\"tone\":\"info\"}]},{\"id\":\"risk3\",\"label\":\"存储迁移仅预发验证\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"badge\":\"P2\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"risk3a\",\"label\":\"10-08 预发跑通 14m,正式环境与回归尚未执行\"}]}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"欠账清单(缺什么)\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-04/log\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"list\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-04/log\"],\"items\":[\"回退演练:补充数据校验步骤与对账口径(草案 10-10 提交)\",\"灰度开关:推动安全评审入场并明确排期(10-09 至今未启动)\",\"存储迁移:补齐正式环境执行结论与回归报告\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"停滞与过期项\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-04/log\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"timeline\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-04/log\"],\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"契约定义评审通过,含两处字段口径修订\",\"time\":\"10-11 10:30\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"title\":\"回退演练草案提交(缺数据校验)\",\"time\":\"10-10 11:05\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"灰度开关等待安全评审排期\",\"time\":\"10-09 15:40\",\"tone\":\"danger\"},{\"title\":\"存储迁移脚本预发跑通,耗时 14m\",\"time\":\"10-08 09:12\",\"tone\":\"info\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"产物索引\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-04/artifacts\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n5a\",\"type\":\"table\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-04/artifacts\"],\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"name\",\"label\":\"产物\"},{\"key\":\"type\",\"label\":\"类型\"}],\"rows\":[{\"cells\":[[\"name\",\"需求清单 v3\"],[\"type\",\"doc\"]]},{\"cells\":[[\"name\",\"迁移脚本 runbook\"],[\"type\",\"doc\"]]},{\"cells\":[[\"name\",\"评审纪要 10-11\"],[\"type\",\"doc\"]]}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n6\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"建议处置\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n6a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"优先推动安全评审入场以解除灰度阻塞(P0);同时让迁移负责人补齐回退演练的数据校验脚本,避免上线时缺乏可靠回滚路径。存储迁移宜尽早安排正式环境执行窗口,缩短 P2 项的滞留时间。\"}]}]}",
"valid_first": true,
"errors_first": [],
"stats_first": {
"nodes": 13,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"section",
"steps",
"progress",
"section",
"tree",
"section",
"list",
"section",
"timeline",
"section",
"table",
"section",
"markdown"
],
"refsUsed": [
"task:eval/to-04/artifacts",
"task:eval/to-04/log",
"task:eval/to-04/steps"
],
"unknownRefs": []
},
"repaired": false,
"valid_final": true,
"errors_final": [],
"spec": {
"title": "交付门禁自动化 · 风险与欠账视图",
"nodes": [
{
"id": "n1",
"type": "section",
"title": "进度概览",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-04/steps"
],
"children": [
{
"id": "n1a",
"type": "steps",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-04/steps"
],
"steps": {
"current": 2,
"steps": [
{
"label": "需求冻结",
"status": "done"
},
{
"label": "契约定义",
"status": "done"
},
{
"label": "存储迁移",
"status": "active"
},
{
"label": "灰度开关",
"status": "pending"
},
{
"label": "回退演练",
"status": "pending"
}
]
}
},
{
"id": "n1b",
"type": "progress",
"progress": {
"label": "整体完成度",
"value": 0.4
}
}
]
},
{
"id": "n2",
"type": "section",
"title": "风险地图(按严重度)",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-04/log",
"task:eval/to-04/steps"
],
"children": [
{
"id": "n2a",
"type": "tree",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-04/log",
"task:eval/to-04/steps"
],
"tree": {
"nodes": [
{
"id": "risk1",
"label": "灰度开关阻塞:等待安全评审排期",
"tone": "danger",
"badge": "P0",
"children": [
{
"id": "risk1a",
"label": "自 10-09 起排期未启动,阻塞灰度与上线推进",
"tone": "warn"
}
]
},
{
"id": "risk2",
"label": "回退演练不完整:草案缺数据校验步骤",
"tone": "warn",
"badge": "P1",
"children": [
{
"id": "risk2a",
"label": "10-10 草案已提交,需补齐校验脚本与对账口径",
"tone": "info"
}
]
},
{
"id": "risk3",
"label": "存储迁移仅预发验证",
"tone": "info",
"badge": "P2",
"children": [
{
"id": "risk3a",
"label": "10-08 预发跑通 14m,正式环境与回归尚未执行"
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
},
{
"id": "n3",
"type": "section",
"title": "欠账清单(缺什么)",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-04/log"
],
"children": [
{
"id": "n3a",
"type": "list",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-04/log"
],
"items": [
"回退演练:补充数据校验步骤与对账口径(草案 10-10 提交)",
"灰度开关:推动安全评审入场并明确排期(10-09 至今未启动)",
"存储迁移:补齐正式环境执行结论与回归报告"
]
}
]
},
{
"id": "n4",
"type": "section",
"title": "停滞与过期项",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-04/log"
],
"children": [
{
"id": "n4a",
"type": "timeline",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-04/log"
],
"timeline": {
"items": [
{
"title": "契约定义评审通过,含两处字段口径修订",
"time": "10-11 10:30",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"title": "回退演练草案提交(缺数据校验)",
"time": "10-10 11:05",
"tone": "warn"
},
{
"title": "灰度开关等待安全评审排期",
"time": "10-09 15:40",
"tone": "danger"
},
{
"title": "存储迁移脚本预发跑通,耗时 14m",
"time": "10-08 09:12",
"tone": "info"
}
]
}
}
]
},
{
"id": "n5",
"type": "section",
"title": "产物索引",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-04/artifacts"
],
"children": [
{
"id": "n5a",
"type": "table",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-04/artifacts"
],
"table": {
"columns": [
{
"key": "name",
"label": "产物"
},
{
"key": "type",
"label": "类型"
}
],
"rows": [
{
"cells": [
[
"name",
"需求清单 v3"
],
[
"type",
"doc"
]
]
},
{
"cells": [
[
"name",
"迁移脚本 runbook"
],
[
"type",
"doc"
]
]
},
{
"cells": [
[
"name",
"评审纪要 10-11"
],
[
"type",
"doc"
]
]
}
]
}
}
]
},
{
"id": "n6",
"type": "section",
"title": "建议处置",
"children": [
{
"id": "n6a",
"type": "markdown",
"markdown": "优先推动安全评审入场以解除灰度阻塞(P0);同时让迁移负责人补齐回退演练的数据校验脚本,避免上线时缺乏可靠回滚路径。存储迁移宜尽早安排正式环境执行窗口,缩短 P2 项的滞留时间。"
}
]
}
]
},
"stats_final": {
"nodes": 13,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"section",
"steps",
"progress",
"section",
"tree",
"section",
"list",
"section",
"timeline",
"section",
"table",
"section",
"markdown"
],
"refsUsed": [
"task:eval/to-04/artifacts",
"task:eval/to-04/log",
"task:eval/to-04/steps"
],
"idsProvided": 13
},
"wall_s": 30.5
}
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
+209
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,209 @@
{
"task": "to-07",
"family": "task-overview",
"arm": "G",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "progress",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 5106,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 1014,
"completion_tokens": 4092,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"reasoning_tokens": 3580
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 128
}
},
"latency_s": 30.98
},
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 7666,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 1063,
"completion_tokens": 6603,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"reasoning_tokens": 5861
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 128
}
},
"latency_s": 43.92
}
],
"callCount": 2,
"raw_first": "{\"title\":\"交付门禁自动化 · 进度速览\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"进度总览\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"progress\",\"progress\":{\"label\":\"整体完成 2/5\",\"value\":0.4},\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-06/steps\"]},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"steps\":{\"current\":2,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"需求冻结\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"契约定义\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"存储迁移\",\"status\":\"active\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"label\":\"灰度开关\",\"status\":\"pending\"},{\"label\":\"回退演练\",\"status\":\"pending\"}]},\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-06/steps\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"最近动态\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"timeline\",\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"存储迁移脚本预发跑通\",\"time\":\"10-08 09:12\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"markdown\":\"耗时 14m\"},{\"title\":\"灰度开关等待安全评审排期\",\"time\":\"10-09 15:40\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"回退演练草案提交\",\"time\":\"10-10 11:05\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"markdown\":\"缺少数据校验步骤\"},{\"title\":\"契约定义评审通过\",\"time\":\"10-11 10:30\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"markdown\":\"两处字段口径修订\"}]},\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-06/log\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"产物\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"list\",\"items\":[\"需求清单 v3(doc)\",\"迁移脚本 runbook(doc)\",\"评审纪要 10-11(doc)\"],\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-06/artifacts\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"下一步建议\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"1. **推进存储迁移收尾**:预发已跑通(14m),下一步推动生产环境执行并复核耗时是否在可接受范围。\\n2. **解锁灰度开关**:主动跟进安全评审排期,给出明确的预期上线时间,避免成为后续阻塞。\\n3. **补齐回退演练**:当前草案缺数据校验步骤,建议在定档演练前先补齐该环节。\"}}]}]}",
"valid_first": false,
"errors_first": [
"JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 1370 (char 1369)"
],
"stats_first": null,
"raw_repair": "{\n \"title\": \"交付门禁自动化 · 进度概览\",\n \"nodes\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n1\",\n \"type\": \"section\",\n \"title\": \"当前进度\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n1a\",\n \"type\": \"steps\",\n \"steps\": {\n \"current\": 2,\n \"steps\": [\n {\"label\": \"需求冻结\", \"status\": \"done\", \"tone\": \"ok\"},\n {\"label\": \"契约定义\", \"status\": \"done\", \"tone\": \"ok\"},\n {\"label\": \"存储迁移\", \"status\": \"active\"},\n {\"label\": \"灰度开关\", \"status\": \"pending\"},\n {\"label\": \"回退演练\", \"status\": \"pending\"}\n ]\n },\n \"source\": [\"task:eval/to-06/steps\"]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n1b\",\n \"type\": \"markdown\",\n \"markdown\": \"已完成需求冻结与契约定义;存储迁移正在推进,灰度开关与回退演练尚未启动。\"\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n2\",\n \"type\": \"section\",\n \"title\": \"最近动态\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n2a\",\n \"type\": \"timeline\",\n \"timeline\": {\n \"items\": [\n {\"title\": \"存储迁移脚本在预发跑通,耗时 14m\", \"time\": \"10-08 09:12\", \"tone\": \"ok\"},\n {\"title\": \"灰度开关等待安全评审排期\", \"time\": \"10-09 15:40\", \"tone\": \"warn\"},\n {\"title\": \"回退演练草案提交,缺少数据校验步骤\", \"time\": \"10-10 11:05\", \"tone\": \"warn\"},\n {\"title\": \"契约定义评审通过,两处字段口径修订\", \"time\": \"10-11 10:30\", \"tone\": \"ok\"}\n ]\n },\n \"source\": [\"task:eval/to-06/log\"]\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n3\",\n \"type\": \"section\",\n \"title\": \"下一步建议\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n3a\",\n \"type\": \"markdown\",\n \"markdown\": \"建议优先处理:(1) 跟进灰度开关的安全评审排期,避免阻塞灰度上线;(2) 在回退演练草案中补齐数据校验步骤,确保演练结果可被验证。\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n3b\",\n \"type\": \"actions\",\n \"actions\": [\n {\"id\": \"act1\", \"label\": \"推进灰度安全评审\", \"style\": \"primary\"},\n {\"id\": \"act2\", \"label\": \"补齐回退数据校验\", \"style\": \"default\"}\n ]\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"n4\",\n \"type\": \"section\",\n \"title\": \"相关产物\",\n \"children\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"n4a\",\n \"type\": \"list\",\n \"items\": [\"需求清单 v3(doc)\", \"迁移脚本 runbook(doc)\", \"评审纪要 10-11(doc)\"],\n \"source\": [\"task:eval/to-06/artifacts\"]\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n}",
"repaired": true,
"valid_final": true,
"errors_final": [],
"spec": {
"title": "交付门禁自动化 · 进度概览",
"nodes": [
{
"id": "n1",
"type": "section",
"title": "当前进度",
"children": [
{
"id": "n1a",
"type": "steps",
"steps": {
"current": 2,
"steps": [
{
"label": "需求冻结",
"status": "done",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"label": "契约定义",
"status": "done",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"label": "存储迁移",
"status": "active"
},
{
"label": "灰度开关",
"status": "pending"
},
{
"label": "回退演练",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"source": [
"task:eval/to-06/steps"
]
},
{
"id": "n1b",
"type": "markdown",
"markdown": "已完成需求冻结与契约定义;存储迁移正在推进,灰度开关与回退演练尚未启动。"
}
]
},
{
"id": "n2",
"type": "section",
"title": "最近动态",
"children": [
{
"id": "n2a",
"type": "timeline",
"timeline": {
"items": [
{
"title": "存储迁移脚本在预发跑通,耗时 14m",
"time": "10-08 09:12",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"title": "灰度开关等待安全评审排期",
"time": "10-09 15:40",
"tone": "warn"
},
{
"title": "回退演练草案提交,缺少数据校验步骤",
"time": "10-10 11:05",
"tone": "warn"
},
{
"title": "契约定义评审通过,两处字段口径修订",
"time": "10-11 10:30",
"tone": "ok"
}
]
},
"source": [
"task:eval/to-06/log"
]
}
]
},
{
"id": "n3",
"type": "section",
"title": "下一步建议",
"children": [
{
"id": "n3a",
"type": "markdown",
"markdown": "建议优先处理:(1) 跟进灰度开关的安全评审排期,避免阻塞灰度上线;(2) 在回退演练草案中补齐数据校验步骤,确保演练结果可被验证。"
},
{
"id": "n3b",
"type": "actions",
"actions": [
{
"id": "act1",
"label": "推进灰度安全评审",
"style": "primary"
},
{
"id": "act2",
"label": "补齐回退数据校验",
"style": "default"
}
]
}
]
},
{
"id": "n4",
"type": "section",
"title": "相关产物",
"children": [
{
"id": "n4a",
"type": "list",
"items": [
"需求清单 v3(doc)",
"迁移脚本 runbook(doc)",
"评审纪要 10-11(doc)"
],
"source": [
"task:eval/to-06/artifacts"
]
}
]
}
]
},
"stats_final": {
"nodes": 10,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"section",
"steps",
"markdown",
"section",
"timeline",
"section",
"markdown",
"actions",
"section",
"list"
],
"refsUsed": [
"task:eval/to-06/artifacts",
"task:eval/to-06/log",
"task:eval/to-06/steps"
],
"idsProvided": 10
},
"wall_s": 74.9
}
+51
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
{
"task": "to-08",
"family": "task-overview",
"arm": "G",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "risk",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 6083,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 1020,
"completion_tokens": 5063,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"reasoning_tokens": 3845
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 128
}
},
"latency_s": 28.56
},
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 9037,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 1069,
"completion_tokens": 7968,
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 128
}
},
"latency_s": 65.19
}
],
"callCount": 2,
"raw_first": "{\"title\":\"交付门禁自动化 · 风险与欠账视图\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"任务进度概览\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/steps\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/steps\"],\"steps\":{\"current\":2,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"需求冻结\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"契约定义\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"存储迁移\",\"status\":\"active\",\"tone\":\"info\"},{\"label\":\"灰度开关\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"label\":\"回退演练\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"danger\"}]}},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**研判**:从当前步骤依赖看,灰度开关是收尾推进中的最大不确定项;建议优先打通评审排期并补齐回退演练缺口。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"风险与欠账清单\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/steps\",\"task:eval/to-07/log\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"table\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/steps\",\"task:eval/to-07/log\"],\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"item\",\"label\":\"条目\"},{\"key\":\"status\",\"label\":\"状态\"},{\"key\":\"issue\",\"label\":\"卡点 / 欠账\"},{\"key\":\"severity\",\"label\":\"严重度\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"r1\",\"cells\":[[\"item\",\"灰度开关\"],[\"status\",\"pending\"],[\"issue\",\"等待安全评审排期,自 10-09 起无后续进展\"],[\"severity\",\"高 · 关键路径阻塞\"]]},{\"id\":\"r2\",\"cells\":[[\"item\",\"回退演练\"],[\"status\",\"pending\"],[\"issue\",\"草案已提交但缺少数据校验步骤\"],[\"severity\",\"高 · 欠账影响回退可靠性\"]]},{\"id\":\"r3\",\"cells\":[[\"item\",\"存储迁移\"],[\"status\",\"in_progress\"],[\"issue\",\"预发已跑通(耗时 14m),尚未正式上线收口,依赖灰度开关\"],[\"severity\",\"中 · 间接阻塞\"]]},{\"id\":\"r4\",\"cells\":[[\"item\",\"契约定义\"],[\"status\",\"done\"],[\"issue\",\"10-11 评审通过但两处字段口径已修订,下游消费方需复核\"],[\"severity\",\"中 · 潜在回归\"]]}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"风险归类\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/steps\",\"task:eval/to-07/log\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/steps\",\"task:eval/to-07/log\"],\"kv\":[[\"关键路径阻塞\",\"灰度开关 → 等待安全评审排期(10-09)\"],[\"欠账·校验缺失\",\"回退演练草案缺少数据校验步骤(10-10)\"],[\"契约口径变更\",\"两处字段口径修订,需通知下游(10-11)\"],[\"迁移未收口\",\"预发跑通但 in_progress,未正式上线(10-08)\"],[\"潜在过期\",\"灰度开关自 10-09 起未见评审排期更新\"]]}},{\"id\":\"n3b\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**过期项判定**:材料中未给出明确截止日期,但灰度开关自 10-09 起超过 48 小时无进展,且直接阻塞存储迁移收尾与回退演练启动,按经验应视为潜在过期项,建议立即跟进。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"最近动态时间线\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/log\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"timeline\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/log\"],\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"存储迁移脚本预发跑通\",\"time\":\"10-08 09:12\",\"tone\":\"ok\",\"markdown\":\"耗时 14m,预发环境验证通过。\"},{\"title\":\"灰度开关等待安全评审排期\",\"time\":\"10-09 15:40\",\"tone\":\"warn\",\"markdown\":\"关键路径阻塞点。\"},{\"title\":\"回退演练草案提交\",\"time\":\"10-10 11:05\",\"tone\":\"danger\",\"markdown\":\"缺少数据校验步骤。\"},{\"title\":\"契约定义评审通过\",\"time\":\"10-11 10:30\",\"tone\":\"info\",\"markdown\":\"两处字段口径已修订。\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"关联产物\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/artifacts\"],\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n5a\",\"type\":\"doc-ref\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/artifacts\"],\"docId\":\"需求清单 v3\"},{\"id\":\"n5b\",\"type\":\"doc-ref\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/artifacts\"],\"docId\":\"迁移脚本 runbook\"},{\"id\":\"n5c\",\"type\":\"doc-ref\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/artifacts\"],\"docId\":\"评审纪要 10-11\"}]},{\"id\":\"n6\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"推进建议(推断)\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n6a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"1. **立即**:推动灰度开关的安全评审排期,解除对存储迁移收尾与回退演练的关键路径阻塞。\\n2. **并行**:补齐回退演练的数据校验步骤(一致性比对、回滚后抽样验证),并补一次完整演练记录。\\n3. **预防**:在灰度评审通过前,先固化存储迁移的回滚脚本与上线检查单,降低上线风险。\\n4. **同步**:将 10-11 契约口径修订通知到所有下游消费方,避免集成回归。\"}]}]}]}",
"valid_first": false,
"errors_first": [
"JSON 解析失败: Expecting ',' delimiter: line 1 column 1796 (char 1795)"
],
"stats_first": null,
"raw_repair": "{\"title\":\"交付门禁自动化 · 风险与欠账视图\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"总览\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"kv\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/steps\",\"task:eval/to-07/artifacts\"],\"kv\":[[\"任务\",\"交付门禁自动化\"],[\"已完成\",\"需求冻结、契约定义\"],[\"进行中\",\"存储迁移\"],[\"待启动\",\"灰度开关、回退演练\"],[\"关键阻塞\",\"灰度开关等安全评审排期\"],[\"关键欠账\",\"回退演练缺数据校验;契约两处字段口径待落地\"],[\"最新产物\",\"需求清单 v3、迁移脚本 runbook、评审纪要 10-11\"]]}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"步骤进度\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/steps\"],\"steps\":{\"current\":2,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"需求冻结\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"契约定义\",\"status\":\"done\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"label\":\"存储迁移\",\"status\":\"active\"},{\"label\":\"灰度开关\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"label\":\"回退演练\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"danger\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"风险摘要\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/log\",\"task:eval/to-07/steps\"],\"markdown\":\"### 风险与欠账概述\\n\\n- **阻塞**:灰度开关等安全评审排期,未启动。依据 10-09 15:40。\\n- **缺陷**:回退演练草案已提交,但缺少数据校验步骤。依据 10-10 11:05。\\n- **欠账**:契约定义评审通过后遗留两处字段口径修订,未跟进落地。依据 10-11 10:30。\\n- **进行中**:存储迁移预发跑通 14m,尚未全量。依据 10-08 09:12。\"}]}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"风险与欠账明细\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"table\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/log\",\"task:eval/to-07/steps\"],\"table\":{\"columns\":[{\"key\":\"cat\",\"label\":\"类别\"},{\"key\":\"item\",\"label\":\"项\"},{\"key\":\"status\",\"label\":\"状态\"},{\"key\":\"detail\",\"label\":\"详情\"},{\"key\":\"evidence\",\"label\":\"依据\"}],\"rows\":[{\"id\":\"r1\",\"cells\":[[\"cat\",\"阻塞\"],[\"item\",\"灰度开关\"],[\"status\",\"pending\"],[\"detail\",\"等待安全评审排期\"],[\"evidence\",\"10-09 15:40\"]]},{\"id\":\"r2\",\"cells\":[[\"cat\",\"缺陷\"],[\"item\",\"回退演练\"],[\"status\",\"pending\"],[\"detail\",\"草案缺少数据校验步骤\"],[\"evidence\",\"10-10 11:05\"]]},{\"id\":\"r3\",\"cells\":[[\"cat\",\"欠账\"],[\"item\",\"契约字段口径\"],[\"status\",\"done→待落地\"],[\"detail\",\"评审通过后两处字段口径修订未跟进\"],[\"evidence\",\"10-11 10:30\"]]},{\"id\":\"r4\",\"cells\":[[\"cat\",\"进行中\"],[\"item\",\"存储迁移\"],[\"status\",\"active\"],[\"detail\",\"预发跑通 14m,待全量\"],[\"evidence\",\"10-08 09:12\"]]}]}}}]},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"近期动态\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n5a\",\"type\":\"timeline\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/log\"],\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"存储迁移脚本预发跑通 14m\",\"time\":\"10-08 09:12\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"title\":\"灰度开关等待安全评审排期\",\"time\":\"10-09 15:40\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"回退演练草案提交,缺少数据校验步骤\",\"time\":\"10-10 11:05\",\"tone\":\"danger\"},{\"title\":\"契约定义评审通过,遗留两处字段口径修订\",\"time\":\"10-11 10:30\",\"tone\":\"info\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n6\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"建议下一步\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n6a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"- 优先跟进安全评审排期,解除灰度开关阻塞\\n- 补全回退演练的数据校验前置与对照口径\\n- 锁定契约字段口径修订的落地窗口,避免影响后续迁移与灰度\\n- 存储迁移从预发向全量推进时同步保留回切预案\"}]}]},{\"id\":\"n7\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"可用产物\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n7a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-07/artifacts\"],\"markdown\":\"- 需求清单 v3(doc)\\n- 迁移脚本 runbook(doc)\\n- 评审纪要 10-11(doc)\"}]}]}]}",
"repaired": true,
"valid_final": false,
"errors_final": [
"JSON 解析失败: Extra data: line 1 column 1097 (char 1096)"
],
"spec": null,
"wall_s": 93.8
}
+215
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,215 @@
{
"task": "to-09",
"family": "task-overview",
"arm": "G",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "handover",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 5120,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 1019,
"completion_tokens": 4101,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"reasoning_tokens": 3482
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 128
}
},
"latency_s": 17.13
}
],
"callCount": 1,
"raw_first": "{\"title\":\"交付门禁自动化 · 交接页\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"项目背景\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"「交付门禁自动化」把发布前的检查、开关与回退统一为可编程流程。当前已完成需求冻结与契约定义,正在推进存储迁移;灰度开关与回退演练尚未启动。先读三份产物了解全貌,再按下方建议顺序接手。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"当前状态\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2b\",\"type\":\"progress\",\"progress\":{\"label\":\"整体进度(5 步中 2 步完成)\",\"value\":0.4},\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-08/steps\"]},{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"steps\":{\"current\":2,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"需求冻结\",\"status\":\"done\"},{\"label\":\"契约定义\",\"status\":\"done\"},{\"label\":\"存储迁移\",\"status\":\"active\"},{\"label\":\"灰度开关\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"label\":\"回退演练\",\"status\":\"pending\",\"tone\":\"danger\"}]},\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-08/steps\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"最近动态\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"timeline\",\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"存储迁移脚本在预发跑通,耗时 14m\",\"time\":\"10-08 09:12\"},{\"title\":\"灰度开关等待安全评审排期\",\"time\":\"10-09 15:40\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"回退演练草案提交,缺少数据校验步骤\",\"time\":\"10-10 11:05\",\"tone\":\"danger\"},{\"title\":\"契约定义评审通过,两处字段口径修订\",\"time\":\"10-11 10:30\",\"tone\":\"ok\"}]},\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-08/log\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"产物清单\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"list\",\"items\":[\"需求清单 v3(doc)\",\"迁移脚本 runbook(doc)\",\"评审纪要 10-11(doc)\"],\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-08/artifacts\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n5\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"接手事项与建议\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n5a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**建议优先顺序**\\n\\n1. 补齐回退演练的数据校验步骤——草案已提交但缺校验环节,是当前阻塞项。\\n2. 推动灰度开关的安全评审排期——目前在等他人排期,主动跟进能缩短关键路径。\\n3. 核对契约定义的字段口径——10-11 评审有两处修订,需同步到迁移脚本与下游消费者。\\n\\n**建议阅读顺序**:需求清单 v3 → 评审纪要 10-11 → 迁移脚本 runbook。\"}]}]}",
"valid_first": true,
"errors_first": [],
"stats_first": {
"nodes": 11,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"section",
"markdown",
"section",
"progress",
"steps",
"section",
"timeline",
"section",
"list",
"section",
"markdown"
],
"refsUsed": [
"task:eval/to-08/artifacts",
"task:eval/to-08/log",
"task:eval/to-08/steps"
],
"unknownRefs": []
},
"repaired": false,
"valid_final": true,
"errors_final": [],
"spec": {
"title": "交付门禁自动化 · 交接页",
"nodes": [
{
"id": "n1",
"type": "section",
"title": "项目背景",
"children": [
{
"id": "n1a",
"type": "markdown",
"markdown": "「交付门禁自动化」把发布前的检查、开关与回退统一为可编程流程。当前已完成需求冻结与契约定义,正在推进存储迁移;灰度开关与回退演练尚未启动。先读三份产物了解全貌,再按下方建议顺序接手。"
}
]
},
{
"id": "n2",
"type": "section",
"title": "当前状态",
"children": [
{
"id": "n2b",
"type": "progress",
"progress": {
"label": "整体进度(5 步中 2 步完成)",
"value": 0.4
},
"source": [
"task:eval/to-08/steps"
]
},
{
"id": "n2a",
"type": "steps",
"steps": {
"current": 2,
"steps": [
{
"label": "需求冻结",
"status": "done"
},
{
"label": "契约定义",
"status": "done"
},
{
"label": "存储迁移",
"status": "active"
},
{
"label": "灰度开关",
"status": "pending",
"tone": "warn"
},
{
"label": "回退演练",
"status": "pending",
"tone": "danger"
}
]
},
"source": [
"task:eval/to-08/steps"
]
}
]
},
{
"id": "n3",
"type": "section",
"title": "最近动态",
"children": [
{
"id": "n3a",
"type": "timeline",
"timeline": {
"items": [
{
"title": "存储迁移脚本在预发跑通,耗时 14m",
"time": "10-08 09:12"
},
{
"title": "灰度开关等待安全评审排期",
"time": "10-09 15:40",
"tone": "warn"
},
{
"title": "回退演练草案提交,缺少数据校验步骤",
"time": "10-10 11:05",
"tone": "danger"
},
{
"title": "契约定义评审通过,两处字段口径修订",
"time": "10-11 10:30",
"tone": "ok"
}
]
},
"source": [
"task:eval/to-08/log"
]
}
]
},
{
"id": "n4",
"type": "section",
"title": "产物清单",
"children": [
{
"id": "n4a",
"type": "list",
"items": [
"需求清单 v3(doc)",
"迁移脚本 runbook(doc)",
"评审纪要 10-11(doc)"
],
"source": [
"task:eval/to-08/artifacts"
]
}
]
},
{
"id": "n5",
"type": "section",
"title": "接手事项与建议",
"children": [
{
"id": "n5a",
"type": "markdown",
"markdown": "**建议优先顺序**\n\n1. 补齐回退演练的数据校验步骤——草案已提交但缺校验环节,是当前阻塞项。\n2. 推动灰度开关的安全评审排期——目前在等他人排期,主动跟进能缩短关键路径。\n3. 核对契约定义的字段口径——10-11 评审有两处修订,需同步到迁移脚本与下游消费者。\n\n**建议阅读顺序**:需求清单 v3 → 评审纪要 10-11 → 迁移脚本 runbook。"
}
]
}
]
},
"stats_final": {
"nodes": 11,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"section",
"markdown",
"section",
"progress",
"steps",
"section",
"timeline",
"section",
"list",
"section",
"markdown"
],
"refsUsed": [
"task:eval/to-08/artifacts",
"task:eval/to-08/log",
"task:eval/to-08/steps"
],
"idsProvided": 11
},
"wall_s": 17.1
}
+192
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,192 @@
{
"task": "to-10",
"family": "task-overview",
"arm": "G",
"model": "MiniMax-M3",
"goalKind": "progress",
"calls": [
{
"usage": {
"total_tokens": 2766,
"total_characters": 0,
"prompt_tokens": 1014,
"completion_tokens": 1752,
"completion_tokens_details": {
"reasoning_tokens": 0
},
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"cached_tokens": 768
}
},
"latency_s": 14.71
}
],
"callCount": 1,
"raw_first": "{\"title\":\"交付门禁自动化 · 进度一览\",\"nodes\":[{\"id\":\"n1\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"当前阶段\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n1a\",\"type\":\"steps\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-09/steps\"],\"steps\":{\"current\":2,\"steps\":[{\"label\":\"需求冻结\",\"status\":\"done\"},{\"label\":\"契约定义\",\"status\":\"done\"},{\"label\":\"存储迁移\",\"status\":\"active\"},{\"label\":\"灰度开关\",\"status\":\"pending\"},{\"label\":\"回退演练\",\"status\":\"pending\"}]}},{\"id\":\"n1b\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"**当前进行中:存储迁移**——预发已跑通(14m)。两个待办存在外部依赖与草案缺口:**灰度开关**等安全评审排期;**回退演练**草案缺数据校验步骤。\"}]},{\"id\":\"n2\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"最近动态\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n2a\",\"type\":\"timeline\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-09/log\"],\"timeline\":{\"items\":[{\"title\":\"存储迁移脚本预发跑通,耗时 14m\",\"time\":\"10-08 09:12\",\"tone\":\"ok\"},{\"title\":\"灰度开关等待安全评审排期\",\"time\":\"10-09 15:40\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"回退演练草案提交,缺少数据校验步骤\",\"time\":\"10-10 11:05\",\"tone\":\"warn\"},{\"title\":\"契约定义评审通过,两处字段口径修订\",\"time\":\"10-11 10:30\",\"tone\":\"ok\"}]}}]},{\"id\":\"n3\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"产物\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n3a\",\"type\":\"list\",\"source\":[\"task:eval/to-09/artifacts\"],\"items\":[\"需求清单 v3(doc)\",\"迁移脚本 runbook(doc)\",\"评审纪要 10-11(doc)\"]}]},{\"id\":\"n4\",\"type\":\"section\",\"title\":\"下一步建议\",\"children\":[{\"id\":\"n4a\",\"type\":\"markdown\",\"markdown\":\"1. **灰度开关**:主动跟进安全评审排期,避免成为唯一的卡点。\\n2. **回退演练**:先补齐数据校验步骤,再提交正式评审。\\n3. **契约修订**:10-11 评审已修订两处字段口径,记得同步到上下游服务与文档,避免口径漂移。\\n4. **存储迁移**:预发已跑通,可基于此结果准备灰度切换预案。\"}]}]}",
"valid_first": true,
"errors_first": [],
"stats_first": {
"nodes": 9,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"section",
"steps",
"markdown",
"section",
"timeline",
"section",
"list",
"section",
"markdown"
],
"refsUsed": [
"task:eval/to-09/artifacts",
"task:eval/to-09/log",
"task:eval/to-09/steps"
],
"unknownRefs": []
},
"repaired": false,
"valid_final": true,
"errors_final": [],
"spec": {
"title": "交付门禁自动化 · 进度一览",
"nodes": [
{
"id": "n1",
"type": "section",
"title": "当前阶段",
"children": [
{
"id": "n1a",
"type": "steps",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-09/steps"
],
"steps": {
"current": 2,
"steps": [
{
"label": "需求冻结",
"status": "done"
},
{
"label": "契约定义",
"status": "done"
},
{
"label": "存储迁移",
"status": "active"
},
{
"label": "灰度开关",
"status": "pending"
},
{
"label": "回退演练",
"status": "pending"
}
]
}
},
{
"id": "n1b",
"type": "markdown",
"markdown": "**当前进行中:存储迁移**——预发已跑通(14m)。两个待办存在外部依赖与草案缺口:**灰度开关**等安全评审排期;**回退演练**草案缺数据校验步骤。"
}
]
},
{
"id": "n2",
"type": "section",
"title": "最近动态",
"children": [
{
"id": "n2a",
"type": "timeline",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-09/log"
],
"timeline": {
"items": [
{
"title": "存储迁移脚本预发跑通,耗时 14m",
"time": "10-08 09:12",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"title": "灰度开关等待安全评审排期",
"time": "10-09 15:40",
"tone": "warn"
},
{
"title": "回退演练草案提交,缺少数据校验步骤",
"time": "10-10 11:05",
"tone": "warn"
},
{
"title": "契约定义评审通过,两处字段口径修订",
"time": "10-11 10:30",
"tone": "ok"
}
]
}
}
]
},
{
"id": "n3",
"type": "section",
"title": "产物",
"children": [
{
"id": "n3a",
"type": "list",
"source": [
"task:eval/to-09/artifacts"
],
"items": [
"需求清单 v3(doc)",
"迁移脚本 runbook(doc)",
"评审纪要 10-11(doc)"
]
}
]
},
{
"id": "n4",
"type": "section",
"title": "下一步建议",
"children": [
{
"id": "n4a",
"type": "markdown",
"markdown": "1. **灰度开关**:主动跟进安全评审排期,避免成为唯一的卡点。\n2. **回退演练**:先补齐数据校验步骤,再提交正式评审。\n3. **契约修订**:10-11 评审已修订两处字段口径,记得同步到上下游服务与文档,避免口径漂移。\n4. **存储迁移**:预发已跑通,可基于此结果准备灰度切换预案。"
}
]
}
]
},
"stats_final": {
"nodes": 9,
"maxDepth": 2,
"types": [
"section",
"steps",
"markdown",
"section",
"timeline",
"section",
"list",
"section",
"markdown"
],
"refsUsed": [
"task:eval/to-09/artifacts",
"task:eval/to-09/log",
"task:eval/to-09/steps"
],
"idsProvided": 9
},
"wall_s": 14.7
}
+98
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
{
"B": {
"arm": "B",
"tasks": 30,
"calls": 30,
"prompt_tok": 13565,
"completion_tok": 41000,
"cached_tok": 3456,
"cost_cny": 0.38,
"wall_s": 457.3,
"cost_cny_per_task": 0.013,
"markdown_pipe_table_on_compare": "3/3"
},
"G": {
"arm": "G",
"tasks": 30,
"calls": 42,
"prompt_tok": 43717,
"completion_tok": 220981,
"cached_tok": 16391,
"cost_cny": 2.0,
"wall_s": 1766.1,
"cost_cny_per_task": 0.067,
"valid_first": "18/30 (60%)",
"valid_final": "25/30 (83%)",
"repaired": 12,
"structure_fit": 0.66,
"source_coverage": 0.87,
"ids_provided_tasks": 25
},
"G-hs": {
"arm": "G-hs",
"tasks": 10,
"calls": 20,
"prompt_tok": 18210,
"completion_tok": 24477,
"cached_tok": 12897,
"cost_cny": 0.5,
"wall_s": 370.9,
"cost_cny_per_task": 0.05,
"valid_first": "0/10 (0%)",
"valid_final": "2/10 (20%)",
"repaired": 10,
"structure_fit": 0.89,
"source_coverage": 0.25,
"ids_provided_tasks": 2
},
"r1_divergence": [
{
"group": "facts-A",
"pair": "rc-01~rc-02",
"jaccard": 0.44,
"primary": "section|section",
"distinct": true
},
{
"group": "facts-A",
"pair": "rc-01~rc-03",
"jaccard": 0.17,
"primary": "section|markdown",
"distinct": true
},
{
"group": "facts-A",
"pair": "rc-02~rc-03",
"jaccard": 0.32,
"primary": "section|markdown",
"distinct": true
},
{
"group": "facts-B",
"pair": "rc-07~rc-08",
"jaccard": 0.26,
"primary": "section|section",
"distinct": true
},
{
"group": "facts-B",
"pair": "rc-07~rc-09",
"jaccard": 0.5,
"primary": "section|section",
"distinct": true
},
{
"group": "facts-B",
"pair": "rc-08~rc-09",
"jaccard": 0.45,
"primary": "section|section",
"distinct": true
}
],
"r1_distinct_pairs": "6/6",
"G_structure_fit_by_family": {
"research-compare": 0.54,
"requirement-input": 0.88,
"task-overview": 0.58
}
}
+156
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""U1 试验运行器(原型):B=Markdown 基线,G=UINode 生成(含一次修复),G-hs=轻量档子集。
用法:python3 run_trial.py --arm G [--limit N] [--only rc-01,rc-02]
密钥经环境 MINIMAX_API_KEY 注入;预算护栏 >¥200 或单臂调用超限时中止。
"""
import argparse
import json
import os
import sys
import time
sys.path.insert(0, os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__)))
from harness import (BASELINE_PROMPT, CATALOG_PROMPT, build_user_message,
call_llm, extract_json, validate_spec)
HERE = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))
RESULTS = os.path.join(HERE, "results")
# E5 任务卡记录的 MiniMax 档位价($/M tokens:入/出),汇率按 7.2 折 CNY;保守不计缓存折扣。
PRICE = {"MiniMax-M3": (0.3, 1.2), "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed": (0.6, 2.4)}
BUDGET_CNY, ARM_CALL_CAPS = 200.0, {"B": 60, "G": 60, "G-hs": 20}
def spent_cny():
total = 0.0
for arm in os.listdir(RESULTS) if os.path.isdir(RESULTS) else []:
d = os.path.join(RESULTS, arm)
if not os.path.isdir(d):
continue
for fn in os.listdir(d):
if not fn.endswith(".json"):
continue
try:
rec = json.load(open(os.path.join(d, fn)))
except Exception:
continue
for c in rec.get("calls", []):
u = c.get("usage", {})
pin, pout = PRICE.get(rec.get("model", ""), (0, 0))
total += (u.get("prompt_tokens", 0) / 1e6 * pin + u.get("completion_tokens", 0) / 1e6 * pout) * 7.2
return total
def call_count(arm):
d = os.path.join(RESULTS, arm)
if not os.path.isdir(d):
return 0
return sum(json.load(open(os.path.join(d, fn))).get("callCount", 1)
for fn in os.listdir(d) if fn.endswith(".json"))
def run_task(arm, model, task):
user = build_user_message(task)
sids = {m["sourceId"] for m in task["materials"]}
rec = {"task": task["id"], "family": task["family"], "arm": arm, "model": model,
"goalKind": task["expect"]["goalKind"], "calls": [], "callCount": 0}
def call(system, user, max_tokens):
r = call_llm(model, system, user, max_tokens)
rec["calls"].append({"usage": r["usage"], "latency_s": r["latency_s"]})
rec["callCount"] += 1
return r
if arm == "B":
r = call(BASELINE_PROMPT, user, 2500)
rec["markdown"] = r["content"]
rec["ok"] = bool(r["content"].strip())
return rec
# G / G-hs:生成 + 至多一次修复。max_tokens 需容纳内联 <think> + 完整 JSON(6000 会在
# M3 上被思考段挤占导致截断,见 results/ 首轮 rc-03..08 失败样本)。
r1 = call(CATALOG_PROMPT, user, 14000)
rec["raw_first"] = r1["content"]
errors, stats, spec = [], None, None
try:
spec = extract_json(r1["content"])
errors, stats = validate_spec(spec, sids)
except Exception as e:
errors = [f"JSON 解析失败: {e}"]
rec["valid_first"] = not errors
rec["errors_first"] = errors[:15]
rec["stats_first"] = {"nodes": stats["nodes"], "maxDepth": stats["maxDepth"],
"types": stats["types"], "refsUsed": sorted(stats["refsUsed"]),
"unknownRefs": sorted(stats["unknownRefs"])} if stats else None
if errors:
fix_user = user + "\n\n你上一次的输出被宿主拒绝,错误如下:\n" + \
"\n".join(f"- {e}" for e in errors[:15]) + \
"\n\n请修正后重新输出完整 JSON 对象(仍只输出 JSON)。"
r2 = call(CATALOG_PROMPT, fix_user, 14000)
rec["raw_repair"] = r2["content"]
try:
spec = extract_json(r2["content"])
errors, stats = validate_spec(spec, sids)
except Exception as e:
errors = [f"JSON 解析失败: {e}"]
rec["repaired"] = True
else:
rec["repaired"] = False
rec["valid_final"] = not errors
rec["errors_final"] = errors[:15]
rec["spec"] = spec if not errors else None
if stats and not errors:
rec["stats_final"] = {"nodes": stats["nodes"], "maxDepth": stats["maxDepth"],
"types": stats["types"], "refsUsed": sorted(stats["refsUsed"]),
"idsProvided": len(stats["idsSeen"])}
return rec
def main():
ap = argparse.ArgumentParser()
ap.add_argument("--arm", required=True, choices=list(ARM_CALL_CAPS))
ap.add_argument("--limit", type=int, default=0)
ap.add_argument("--only", default="")
args = ap.parse_args()
tasks = json.load(open(os.path.join(HERE, "fixtures.json")))["tasks"]
if args.only:
keep = set(args.only.split(","))
tasks = [t for t in tasks if t["id"] in keep]
if args.arm == "G-hs":
tasks = [t for t in tasks if t["family"] != "research-compare" or t.get("sharedGroup")][:10]
if args.limit:
tasks = tasks[:args.limit]
model = "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed" if args.arm == "G-hs" else "MiniMax-M3"
outdir = os.path.join(RESULTS, args.arm)
os.makedirs(outdir, exist_ok=True)
for t in tasks:
out = os.path.join(outdir, t["id"] + ".json")
if os.path.exists(out):
old = json.load(open(out))
if old.get("arm") == args.arm and old.get("model") == model and (
old.get("ok") or old.get("valid_final")):
print(f"[skip] {t['id']} (已完成)")
continue
if call_count(args.arm) >= ARM_CALL_CAPS[args.arm]:
print(f"[stop] 臂 {args.arm} 达调用上限 {ARM_CALL_CAPS[args.arm]}")
break
spent, est = spent_cny(), 0.35 # 单次最坏估价(¥)先行校验
if spent + est > BUDGET_CNY:
print(f"[stop] 预算护栏:已花 ¥{spent:.2f} + 单次估价 ¥{est:.2f} 将超 ¥{BUDGET_CNY}")
break
t0 = time.time()
rec = run_task(args.arm, model, t)
rec["wall_s"] = round(time.time() - t0, 1)
json.dump(rec, open(out, "w"), ensure_ascii=False, indent=1)
flag = "OK " if (rec.get("ok") or rec.get("valid_final")) else "ERR"
print(f"[{flag}] {t['id']} calls={rec['callCount']} wall={rec['wall_s']}s "
f"spent≈¥{spent_cny():.2f}")
print(f"[done] arm={args.arm} calls={call_count(args.arm)}/{ARM_CALL_CAPS[args.arm]} "
f"spent≈¥{spent_cny():.2f}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
+133
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""U1 评分器(原型):聚合 results/ 各臂,输出指标表与成本核算。"""
import json
import os
from collections import Counter
HERE = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))
RESULTS = os.path.join(HERE, "results")
PRICE = {"MiniMax-M3": (0.3, 1.2), "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed": (0.6, 2.4)}
def load(arm):
d = os.path.join(RESULTS, arm)
if not os.path.isdir(d):
return []
return [json.load(open(os.path.join(d, fn))) for fn in sorted(os.listdir(d)) if fn.endswith(".json")]
def cost_of(rec):
pin, pout = PRICE.get(rec.get("model", ""), (0, 0))
c = 0.0
for x in rec.get("calls", []):
u = x.get("usage", {})
c += (u.get("prompt_tokens", 0) / 1e6 * pin + u.get("completion_tokens", 0) / 1e6 * pout) * 7.2
return c
def tok(rec):
p = sum(x.get("usage", {}).get("prompt_tokens", 0) for x in rec.get("calls", []))
c = sum(x.get("usage", {}).get("completion_tokens", 0) for x in rec.get("calls", []))
cached = sum(x.get("usage", {}).get("prompt_tokens_details", {}).get("cached_tokens", 0) for x in rec.get("calls", []))
return p, c, cached
def arm_stats(recs, label):
if not recs:
return {"arm": label, "tasks": 0}
p = sum(tok(r)[0] for r in recs); c = sum(tok(r)[1] for r in recs)
cached = sum(tok(r)[2] for r in recs)
cost = sum(cost_of(r) for r in recs)
calls = sum(r.get("callCount", 1) for r in recs)
wall = sum(r.get("wall_s", 0) for r in recs)
out = {"arm": label, "tasks": len(recs), "calls": calls, "prompt_tok": p,
"completion_tok": c, "cached_tok": cached, "cost_cny": round(cost, 2),
"wall_s": round(wall, 1), "cost_cny_per_task": round(cost / len(recs), 3)}
valid = [r for r in recs if r.get("valid_final")]
if label.startswith("G"):
vf = [r for r in recs if r.get("valid_first")]
out.update({
"valid_first": f"{len(vf)}/{len(recs)} ({100*len(vf)//len(recs)}%)",
"valid_final": f"{len(valid)}/{len(recs)} ({100*len(valid)//len(recs)}%)",
"repaired": sum(1 for r in recs if r.get("repaired")),
})
fits, src_cov, ids_provided = [], [], []
for r in recs:
fx = json.load(open(os.path.join(HERE, "fixtures.json")))
task = next(t for t in fx["tasks"] if t["id"] == r["task"])
types = set((r.get("stats_final") or r.get("stats_first") or {}).get("types", []) or [])
if types:
exp = set(task["expect"]["nodeTypesAny"])
fits.append(len(types & exp) / len(exp))
nsources = len(task["materials"])
used = (r.get("stats_final") or r.get("stats_first") or {}).get("refsUsed") or []
src_cov.append(len(set(used)) / nsources)
if r.get("stats_final", {}).get("idsProvided"):
ids_provided.append(1)
out.update({
"structure_fit": round(sum(fits) / len(fits), 2) if fits else None,
"source_coverage": round(sum(src_cov) / len(src_cov), 2) if src_cov else None,
"ids_provided_tasks": len(ids_provided),
})
# B 基线结构契合恒为 0(无结构选择能力),供对照
if label == "B":
md_tables = sum(1 for r in recs if r.get("goalKind") == "compare"
and any(l.strip().startswith("|") and "---" in l for l in r.get("markdown", "").splitlines()))
cmp_tasks = sum(1 for r in recs if r.get("goalKind") == "compare")
out["markdown_pipe_table_on_compare"] = f"{md_tables}/{cmp_tasks}"
return out
def r1_divergence(recs_arm):
"""同料不同目标 → 结构是否分化:类型多重集 Jaccard 距离 + 主类型是否不同。"""
fx = json.load(open(os.path.join(HERE, "fixtures.json")))
groups = {}
for t in fx["tasks"]:
if t.get("sharedGroup"):
groups.setdefault(t["sharedGroup"], []).append(t["id"])
by_id = {r["task"]: r for r in recs_arm if r.get("valid_final")}
rows = []
for g, ids in sorted(groups.items()):
ids = [i for i in ids if i in by_id]
for a in range(len(ids)):
for b in range(a + 1, len(ids)):
ta = Counter(by_id[ids[a]]["stats_final"]["types"])
tb = Counter(by_id[ids[b]]["stats_final"]["types"])
inter = sum((ta & tb).values()); union = sum((ta | tb).values())
jac = inter / union if union else 1.0
prim_a = ta.most_common(1)[0][0] if ta else "-"
prim_b = tb.most_common(1)[0][0] if tb else "-"
rows.append({"group": g, "pair": f"{ids[a]}~{ids[b]}",
"jaccard": round(jac, 2), "primary": f"{prim_a}|{prim_b}",
"distinct": (prim_a != prim_b) or jac < 0.6})
return rows
def main():
fx = json.load(open(os.path.join(HERE, "fixtures.json")))
summary = {}
for arm in ("B", "G", "G-hs"):
recs = load(arm)
if recs:
summary[arm] = arm_stats(recs, arm)
g = load("G")
if g:
rows = r1_divergence(g)
summary["r1_divergence"] = rows
summary["r1_distinct_pairs"] = f"{sum(1 for r in rows if r['distinct'])}/{len(rows)}"
# 按族拆 G 的结构契合
fam = {}
for r in g:
if r.get("valid_final"):
task = next(t for t in fx["tasks"] if t["id"] == r["task"])
types = set(r["stats_final"]["types"])
exp = set(task["expect"]["nodeTypesAny"])
fam.setdefault(task["family"], []).append(len(types & exp) / len(exp))
if fam:
summary["G_structure_fit_by_family"] = {k: round(sum(v) / len(v), 2) for k, v in fam.items()}
json.dump(summary, open(os.path.join(RESULTS, "summary.json"), "w"), ensure_ascii=False, indent=1)
print(json.dumps(summary, ensure_ascii=False, indent=1))
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
+4 -2
View File
@@ -12,8 +12,10 @@
目录中的既有文档不因被收录而自动成为已批准规划。记录、任务关联及收尾建议按
[交付规范的长期方向与任务衔接](policy/delivery.md#长期方向与任务衔接) 执行。
新增方向:[Generative UI 调研与插件方案 r1](modules/documents/docs/proposals/2026-10-10-generative-ui-plugin.md)。
2026-10-11 用户已裁定首试点(对话内分析页)、可信编译插件交付与 U1 试验参数;试验、实施与部署分别评审。
新增方向:[Generative UI 调研与插件方案 r2](modules/documents/docs/proposals/2026-10-10-generative-ui-plugin.md)。
2026-10-11 用户裁定首试点(对话内分析页)、可信编译插件交付与试验参数;U1 受控试验当日完成
(结构分化 6/6、生成走工具参数通道、首期自研 renderer,详见方案「U1 结果与 r2 修订」);
U2 起实施与部署分别评审。
- [多人协作存储与分布式演进方案](modules/documents/docs/proposals/2026-10-11-collaboration-storage-and-distribution.md):
10–100 人、多项目、多会话并行;PostgreSQL 团队档、迁移恢复与多实例执行。方案 r1 已批准