Why: The review candidate needs reproducible evidence bound to the exact Dev and Frontend commits.
Evidence: SELF receipts record 272 unit tests, the production build, and 16 browser scenarios on Dev 49ef24b.
Impact: Updates only the task record; product behavior is unchanged.
Refs: feature/workbench-visual-redesign
Why: The review candidate needs reproducible evidence bound to the exact Dev and Frontend commits.
Evidence: SELF receipts record 272 unit tests, the production build, and 16 browser scenarios on Dev 49ef24b.
Impact: Updates only the task record; product behavior is unchanged.
Refs: feature/workbench-visual-redesign
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=cc40e10f3b4b6e41cb3a7aa0826e08dd3b8b7270.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: The review candidate needs reproducible evidence bound to the exact Dev and Frontend commits.
Evidence: SELF receipts record 272 unit tests, the production build, and 16 browser scenarios on Dev 49ef24b.
Impact: Updates only the task record; product behavior is unchanged.
Refs: feature/workbench-visual-redesign
Why: Long-history task tests could finish while Git background maintenance still rewrote a disposable clone, racing TemporaryDirectory cleanup and failing CI with a non-empty .git directory.
Evidence: The failing test passes 25/25 and all 344 governance tests pass locally.
Impact: Test fixture only; product, governance commands, and runtime behavior are unchanged.
Refs: Dev run 3237 jobs 4951 and 4965
Why: The task record must point to the concrete Dev combination under review.
Evidence: Dev PR #556 targets current main and pins the merged Frontend and UI trees.
Impact: Updates only delivery metadata.
Refs: Dev #556
Why: The review candidate needs reproducible evidence bound to the exact Dev and Frontend commits.
Evidence: SELF receipts record 272 unit tests, the production build, and 16 browser scenarios on Dev 49ef24b.
Impact: Updates only the task record; product behavior is unchanged.
Refs: feature/workbench-visual-redesign
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=b8edf13dc7b818d6e61b829f6e88202ec553f2fc.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: The review candidate needs reproducible evidence bound to the exact Dev and Frontend commits.
Evidence: SELF receipts record 272 unit tests, the production build, and 16 browser scenarios on Dev 49ef24b.
Impact: Updates only the task record; product behavior is unchanged.
Refs: feature/workbench-visual-redesign
Why: The Dev composition must consume the reviewed Frontend and UI changes from their authoritative main branches.
Evidence: Frontend and UI merge trees equal the locally verified candidate trees; UI exact-head CI passed.
Impact: Advances only the Frontend and UI pins and records the component merge results.
Refs: Frontend #87; UI #56
Why: The review candidate needs reproducible evidence bound to the exact Dev and Frontend commits.
Evidence: SELF receipts record 272 unit tests, the production build, and 16 browser scenarios on Dev 49ef24b.
Impact: Updates only the task record; product behavior is unchanged.
Refs: feature/workbench-visual-redesign
Why: Independent review found that the visual frame bypassed token and motion ownership and lacked dark/molv proof.
Evidence: UI 4cae1c4 passes 163 tests; Frontend 9b9f24b passes its design guard and 19 browser scenarios across all themes.
Impact: Pairs the new UI tokens with their Frontend consumer and documents the governing design rule.
Refs: Frontend #87; UI #56
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=33261925a10c4eee40d1b6175b3895e78a47ef02.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: The review candidate needs reproducible evidence bound to the exact Dev and Frontend commits.
Evidence: SELF receipts record 272 unit tests, the production build, and 16 browser scenarios on Dev 49ef24b.
Impact: Updates only the task record; product behavior is unchanged.
Refs: feature/workbench-visual-redesign
Why: The inverse create control needed its divider and hover state adapted to the new dark navigation surface.
Evidence: Frontend 8dc68fd passes the focused browser layout test and production build locally.
Impact: Advances the Frontend pin and records the final local candidate.
Refs: feature/workbench-visual-redesign
Why: The review candidate needs reproducible evidence bound to the exact Dev and Frontend commits.
Evidence: SELF receipts record 272 unit tests, the production build, and 16 browser scenarios on Dev 49ef24b.
Impact: Updates only the task record; product behavior is unchanged.
Refs: feature/workbench-visual-redesign
Why: The first spacing-focused candidate still resembled the flat gray workspace and did not meet the user's visual target.
Evidence: Frontend ddf3135 passes 272 unit tests, 16 browser scenarios across 320-1920px, and a production build locally.
Impact: Advances the Frontend pin to the visibly differentiated navigation, conversation, and work surfaces.
Refs: feature/workbench-visual-redesign
Why: The deployed workbench needs a clear visual hierarchy across context, conversation, and work without adding new product concepts.
Evidence: Frontend b04f4de passes 272 unit tests, 16 browser scenarios across 320-1920px, and a production build locally.
Impact: Advances only the Frontend pin and records the approved visual increment; runtime adoption remains separately verified.
Refs: feature/workbench-visual-redesign
Why: establish the authorized task workspace and its initial baseline.
Evidence: preserved precheck receipt in .task/feature-workbench-visual-redesign.md; R0=99119a733830bc120cd6747b8b61736ea6da6078.
Impact: task metadata only; the feature workspace starts at 99119a7338.
Refs: .task/feature-workbench-visual-redesign.md
weichen