Why: Keep the final PR, component references and operational acceptance boundaries in the authoritative task record.
Evidence: Existing fixed-product review and local verification receipts are linked without relabeling their provenance.
Impact: Task-record metadata only; the reviewed product combination is unchanged.
Refs: Dev #565
Why: Deliver the completed conversation and work-card experience to 8788 after exact-head gates.
Evidence: Independent review and both focused addenda are complete; local test, build and environment-conflict records are retained honestly.
Impact: Pin the final frontend ownership guard and record delivery boundaries; no further product scope is added.
Refs: feature/workbench-flow-completion
Why: Complete execution history must retain outputs beyond one API event page.
Evidence: Independent replay passed both pagination-boundary and stalled-cursor tests; production frontend source is unchanged.
Impact: Pin a test-only frontend follow-up to the reviewed workbench combination.
Refs: feature/workbench-flow-completion review pagination addendum
Why: Track background execution before starting it and preserve generated content and ordinary questions across failure paths.
Evidence: Local full combination test passed before this bounded closure; new fault and race regressions pass, with independent closure and final gates pending.
Impact: Update only the reviewed Backend/UI closure and saved local verification output.
Refs: feature/workbench-flow-completion
Why: New questions, rejected messages and delayed result projection must remain recoverable.
Evidence: Focused review regressions, frontend/UI suites and browser mixed-input checks pass locally; full combination retest and independent closure follow.
Impact: Preserve user intent, repair saved result projections and keep archived work read-only.
Refs: feature/workbench-flow-completion
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=37a8791cb9f736a7f58e87a88389a55095f06e0d.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Complete the approved conversation and background-work experience without changing the accepted visual theme.
Evidence: Component regressions and 23 local browser journeys pass; review and final exact-head gates remain pending.
Impact: Combine full results, optional decisions, saved process and independent chronology with compatible optional contracts.
Refs: feature/workbench-flow-completion
Why: Freeze a shared contract for independent implementation units.
Evidence: make contracts generated both TypeScript consumers.
Impact: Component-only baseline for parallel scoped work.
Refs: feature/workbench-flow-completion
Why: Preserve fixes already merged by parallel work.
Evidence: Component branches were created from freshly fetched origin/main.
Impact: Record the actual shared baseline before generating contracts.
Refs: feature/workbench-flow-completion
Why: Complete the uploaded-material work flow and preserve current backend fixes.
Evidence: Imported READY startup receipt is attached to the task card.
Impact: Establish isolated implementation scope and component baseline.
Refs: feature/workbench-flow-completion
Why: establish the authorized task workspace and its initial baseline.
Evidence: preserved precheck receipt in .task/feature-workbench-flow-completion.md; R0=4ba5c40a609dc07deb34d05761b00c29b44f2355.
Impact: task metadata only; the feature workspace starts at 4ba5c40a60.
Refs: .task/feature-workbench-flow-completion.md
weichen