Why: deciding what enters the library from an external prompt catalog
needs a stated rule (carrier mechanism or future slot) and an auditable
per-item disposition, otherwise coverage drifts by reviewer taste.
Evidence: table maps every Claude Code catalog entry to a library module
or an explicit not-ported reason.
Impact: guide gains section 9; no code change.
Refs: feature/prompt-catalog-coverage task card.
Why: the prompt system's design rationale (layering, the eight module
patterns, trigger semantics, override chain) needs to live with the
docs so future prompt work follows it instead of re-deriving it.
Evidence: guide content distilled from the implemented library and the
Claude prompt catalog analysis recorded in the task card.
Impact: new docs/guides/prompt-library-design.md; no code change.
Refs: feature/prompt-library task card.
Why: current UI scatters creation entries (project + at sidebar top-left,
new session at bottom-left), has no user/tenant surfaces, and the project
tree forces per-project navigation; the system targets multi-user
multi-tenant operation.
Evidence:
- Studied zai-org/ZCode desktop layout (WorkspaceShellLayout, WorkspaceSidebar,
DESIGN.md) and mapped transferable patterns (single New-Task entry,
organize-by views, sidebar account footer) with repo file citations.
- Three layout proposals (task-centric / activity rail / project portal) with
comparison table and recommendation A; auth stage-2 design (orgs,
memberships, server sessions) with SSE cookie upgrade removing ?key=.
- Five static demos (index + A/B/C + auth) verified headless: DOM layout
assertions (column widths, view switching, screen switching), clipping and
contrast QA clean, zero console errors, light/dark themes render.
Impact: documents only; no code change. Demos double as the R4 design-token
target palette. Implementation proceeds only after direction is approved.
Refs: docs/proposals/2026-09-30-ui-inbox-command-workspace.md (D25-D33),
docs/proposals/2026-09-30-dual-tier-storage-and-multitenancy.md (D17-D24)
Why: T2-T4 changed the interaction foundation (pure-inbox rail, four-entrance command bus, overlay workspaces) and the guide still described the classic tabs; T5 acceptance also requires the verification record with the zero-page walkthrough.
Evidence: zero-page walkthrough 12/12 PASS on a fresh real binary (fresh data dir: empty instance -> project/conversation -> slash commands -> #upload card lifecycle -> card action receipts -> tidy -> HITL block+resolve -> button-entrance dispatch -> plugin workspace declaration -> artifacts -> four-entrance audit); StatusLamp shape+color dual encoding asserted by ui suite; combo make test at pinned heads.
Impact: usage guide sections 4.2-4.7/5/6.2/7 rewritten; new T5 record; no code change.
Refs: docs/proposals/2026-09-30-ui-inbox-command-workspace.md T5; task card feature/polish-r1
Why: T4 acceptance requires a verification record in this repo before the Dev combo pin.
Evidence: backend full sweep green with TestWorkspacesOverlay; ui 23/23 (OverlayHost semantics); frontend tsc+vitest+build; example plugin workspace/command assets JSON-validated; combo make test at pinned heads.
Impact: docs/records only.
Refs: docs/proposals/2026-09-30-ui-inbox-command-workspace.md T4; task card feature/workspaces-r1
Why: T3 acceptance requires a verification record in this repo before the Dev combo pin.
Evidence: backend 15 pkgs ok incl. new cmdbus suite and danger-confirm e2e (dispatch -> confirm card -> action -> committed -> audit query ordered); ui 18/18; frontend 9/9; combo make test at pinned heads.
Impact: docs/records only.
Refs: docs/proposals/2026-09-30-ui-inbox-command-workspace.md T3; task card feature/command-bus-r1
Why: Delivery gate requires a verification record with per-case PASS evidence
for the T1 contract task before requesting review.
Evidence: record covers core/agent-command/frontend/ui suites, combo test and
the additive-compatibility check; contract change list enumerated.
Impact: Documentation only.
Refs: Dev task feature/core-cards-commands-r1
Why: Record the approved design for the interaction foundation phase — inbox/
command-bus/workspace mechanisms sink into the base system, domain views stay
plugin territory (target-system strategy), decisions D25-D33.
Evidence: proposal covers background, five UI principles, dialogue-completeness
P0 constraint, module/repo split (Agent-System-UI, Agent-Command), contract
sketch, task sequence T0-T5 and acceptance criteria.
Impact: Becomes the design baseline for T0-T5 tasks across five repos.
Refs: Agent-System-Dev feature/ui-foundation-r0
weichen