Why: the card and PR description are one record.
Evidence: PR #115 created via the Gitea API.
Impact: task card only.
Refs: Documents PR #115
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: track preservation and merge of the approved U3 contract documents.
Evidence: SELF blob identity, diff check and ancestry checks recorded in the card.
Impact: task card only.
Refs: Dev PR #626; Documents c236d30, fb3a821, 5783940
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: U4 must sync main before stage 7 acceptance; main carries 21 newer commits (renderer, regulations and two-trees documents). Evidence: git merge-tree reported no conflicts; no content resolved by hand. Impact: U4 documents now sit on main 5bb4877. Refs: Dev card feature-iam-u4-role-authority
Why: Register the U9 public contract proposal.
Evidence: CI success on 3a3904fe (governance).
Impact: Documentation only.
Refs: .task/feature-regulations-kb-ext20-proposal.md
Why: the adoption PR is reviewed and its candidate HEAD passed CI; the card closure is folded into the PR so no separate close PR is needed.
Evidence: CI GATE on 9d4582a47f4f4c887afd2fafb3ad507f20716f8d; independent Review REPLAY (cursor-agent-stable --mode ask 全新只读会话（fresh_session=true，session id not-observable）闭合重审 VERDICT: APPROVE（对象 9d4582a，与 HEAD 仅 .task/ 不同）).
Impact: task card only (moved to .task/archive/).
Refs: https://git-home.u1680832.nyat.app:30319/weichen/Agent-System-Documents/pulls/110
Why: independent Review blocked the adoption; the repair unit ran through the shared executor and was integrated with agent-exec apply.
Evidence: .task/evidence/governance-adoption/ (SELF): governance check and agent-exec validate on the repaired head.
Impact: task card and evidence logs only.
Refs: .task/feature-governance-adoption.md
Why: Phase 6 requires one positive executor run and the negative cases (missing config, bad receipt, out-of-scope path, unknown side effect) before adoption becomes active.
Evidence: .task/evidence/governance-adoption/ (SELF): governance check, agent-exec validate and adoption cases; this commit passed the generated pre-commit hook (admit).
Impact: task card and evidence logs only.
Refs: .task/feature-governance-adoption.md
Why: development-governance-v2 Phase 6 adopts the shared governance kit in every formal repository; the executor needs a valid AGENT-EXECUTION.md before any implementation unit can run.
Evidence: generated by dm-server governance init at Development-Manager bd3a7de57a3a9e1a4495b94c5fa5c08d71e7be8c; dm-server agent-exec validate passes.
Impact: configuration and task card only; no code or CI change yet.
Refs: Agent-System-Dev docs/superpowers/plans/2026-10-16-development-governance-v2-master.md
Why: Task 10 closed four independent review rounds and needs a durable record.
Evidence: Backend a2f4978 SELF suite plus host REPLAY of tools/docgen tests and Dev build.
Impact: Documentation only; no product behavior change.
Refs: docs/records/2026-10-15-unified-document-renderer/09-implementation-plan.md Task 10
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: Task 9 now has a reproducible Renderer dependency, CLI implementation, independent review, one corrective pass and exact local/isolated-PostgreSQL evidence that require human assessment.
Evidence: The report fixes RDM 019d60d4 and Renderer 732e7e7, records all review findings and repairs, focused race, vet, make test/build and disposable PostgreSQL verification.
Impact: Documents the local RDM rendering transaction candidate without publishing profiles, migrating a real database, starting Task 10, pushing, merging or deploying.
Refs: Unified document renderer Task 9
Why: The three blocked Word bases now have safe derivative candidates implemented by CLI, independently reviewed, corrected, and verified without publishing profiles or changing source assets.
Evidence: RDM 48120ed and Renderer 732e7e7 bind a clean 44/44 compatibility receipt; the report records the review findings, one corrective pass, 20 safety tests, generator checks, and full build.
Impact: Replaces the prior 41-pass/3-blocked implementation snapshot with 44 safe-preflight draft bindings while retaining human visual and publication gates.
Refs: Unified document renderer Tasks 7-8
Why: PostgreSQL and authenticated product-matrix runs must remain tied to the exact RDM commit on which they executed.
Evidence: The report now distinguishes final-head SQLite and full-suite replay from the earlier 3f60265 PostgreSQL and 44/44 product runs.
Impact: Documentation-only evidence correction; no implementation or publication state changes.
Refs: Unified document renderer Tasks 7-8
Why: 8788 could not render docx because the sandbox hides host site-packages and there is no request path for extra packages. The proposal fixes the design before the implementation lands.
Evidence: SELF — proposal written from the cnv_7936c0a799ff transcript and the existing exec-deps-dir code path.
Impact: Documents only. Index lists the proposal as pending review, not approved.
Refs: docs/proposals/2026-10-15-layered-python-env.md
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: Tasks 7-8 need a reviewable record that separates draft profile generation, legacy RDM product-chain evidence, and actual renderer publication readiness.
Evidence: The report fixes Renderer 732e7e7 and RDM ec24a42, records the independent review and repair, and distinguishes 44/44 compilation from the 41-pass/3-blocked base-package safety preflight.
Impact: Human reviewers can decide corporate visual values and the three unsafe base-package derivatives without treating local SELF checks as publication, migration, or deployment.
Refs: Unified document renderer Tasks 7-8
Why: Fix Task 4-6 behavior, independent review findings, evidence, limits, and the next human review boundary in one durable record.
Evidence: SELF report content binds renderer 0efa07f8ce5cb4e1ff93886cf6769d111cba9872 and its full, race, vet, and diff verification.
Impact: Adds an implementation review record only; no runtime integration, migration, deployment, or publication.
Refs: unified-document-renderer Tasks 4-6
Why: Update the batch review after replacing the temporary profile interface with the immutable snapshot produced by Task 3.
Evidence: SELF contract test observed RED then GREEN; renderer full, race, vet, and diff checks pass at a08ae7ac81d4c648b350d890da97c91e64950769.
Impact: Updates the implementation review record only.
Refs: unified-document-renderer Tasks 2-3
Why: Give the first implementation batch a fixed human-review object with exact outputs, risks, review findings, fixes, evidence, and remaining boundaries.
Evidence: SELF relative-link and diff checks pass; the record cites exact RDM and renderer candidate SHAs and their fresh verification commands.
Impact: Adds an implementation review record only; no runtime, migration, deployment, or publication behavior changes.
Refs: unified-document-renderer Tasks 1-3
Why: Define the approved direction for one rule-driven Word renderer, all-template onboarding, human-readable traceability, and review-aware delivery before implementation starts.
Evidence: SELF documentation checks passed for relative links, balanced code fences, JSON parsing, manifest SHA256 coverage, and git diff whitespace.
Impact: Adds a 12-document review set and immutable review manifest; no runtime code, migration, deployment, or published rule changes.
Refs: feature/rdm-two-trees-latest-templates
Why: the duty page needs one record for the four domain rulings, and the earlier settings plan must show which duty-page sections it no longer owns.
Evidence: SELF review of the proposal text against the approved implementation plan.
Impact: r1 section 4 and the duty-page parts of P5 and P7 point at r2. Settings, members, and the permission matrix stay in r1.
Refs: docs/proposals/2026-10-15-rdm-duty-matrix-rework.md
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
weichen
weichen