Why: Second review kept stages 1-4 at "needs revision": narrow-screen placement
conflicted, unread and current/history rules were inconsistent, idempotency and
quote authorization scope were open, NB12 lacked acceptance for closing a
satisfied choice, and the light-notice assumption had no decidable walkthrough.
Evidence: SELF only. Consistency script PASS (NB01-NB24 and text structure);
real model, browser walkthrough and make test are NOT_RUN.
Impact: Documents only, r2-draft.3. Stage conclusions stay unreviewed; no
business code is authorized.
Refs: Dev task feature/fast-slow-r2-nonblocking
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
weichenandCursor
1d57adddf9