feat(ctx): surface dialogue conflict confirmation cards to triggering user

Capture trigger_user HITL expectations from dialogue adjudication (previously
dropped at the bizdev call site), project them as chat confirmation cards via
taskrun OnTerminal (exactly-once), arm the session PendingExpectation, and
handle confirm_context_fact hits through the supplement-info blackboard path.
Decline (纠正) guides the user to state the correct fact.

.doc/ops/CURRENT.md

@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
 
 | owner | task | branch | worktree | mutex | status |
 |---|---|---|---|---|---|
+| pi | dialogue-ctx-closeout-2026-09-26-r2 | feature/dialogue-ctx-closeout-2026-09-26 | .worktrees/dialogue-ctx-closeout-2026-09-26 | dialogue-ctx | in_progress |
 | pi | worktree-final-closeout-2026-09-26 | feature/worktree-final-closeout-2026-09-26 | （已清理） | git:dev+docs | done |
 | cursor-auto | cleanup-audit-r3-2026-09-25 | feature/cleanup-audit-p11-2026-09-25 | .worktrees/cleanup-audit-p11-2026-09-25 | docs-cleanup-audit | done |
 | Cursor | admin-settings-maint-b-2026-09-25 | feature/admin-env-settings-maintenance-2026-09-25 | .worktrees/admin-env-settings-maintenance-2026-09-25 | admin-settings-maintenance | done |

.doc/ops/short-term/2026-09-26-dialogue-ctx-closeout.md

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+# dialogue-ctx-injection 收口（short-term）
+
+- **task_id**: dialogue-ctx-closeout-2026-09-26
+- **owner**: pi
+- **status**: in_progress
+- **授权来源**: 用户会话指令「把 FEATURE-MATRIX 中的 dialogue-ctx-injection、jevdecide-shadow、chat-semantic-replace 完成；一个 feature 一个 feature 完成；严格按规范」
+- **write_scope**: internal/bizdev, internal/server, internal/coordinator, .doc
+- **mutex**: dialogue-ctx
+- **base_dev_sha**: f6ad3344f81ce4fadba660b5abdde5190c059bdb
+- **capabilities**: docs:publish, docs:approve, env:dev
+- **policy_revision**: AGENTS 2026-09 / agent-worktree-workflow r1 / validation-contract 2026-09-21
+- **review_state**: pending
+- **integration_state**: pending
+- **deployment**: pending（dev rebuild + 迁移核验）
+- **cleanup**: pending
+- **remote_sync**: not_requested
+
+## 一、当前进度分析
+
+已完成（dev 已合入，dc29b84c + 1da17a28）：
+
+- `internal/dialoguectx` 清洗/分层/打包；`internal/conflictresolve` 权威裁决 + 卡片限额；squad 工作区 `context/dialogue/` 注入；bizdev 全任务默认注入（`DIALOGUE_CTX_INJECTION` 紧急关闭）；MemoryComposer 近况段；goose `00072_2026-09-25-context-conflict-adjudications.sql`（原设计 00071，因 maintenance-windows 占号顺延为 00072）。
+- 单测全绿（dialoguectx / conflictresolve / squad 落盘 / 关联包）。
+
+未完成（FEATURE-MATRIX 关闭条件）：
+
+1. **dev 迁移未应用**：dev 环境当前停机，`context_conflict_adjudications` 表未在 dev DB 落地。
+2. **真实 PI 落盘核验缺失**：无真实项目任务跑过 `context/dialogue/` 落盘链路。
+3. **冲突确认卡链路断裂（本轮发现的缺口）**：`internal/bizdev/service_task_run.go:646` 对 `buildDialoguePackageForRun` 返回的 expectations 直接丢弃（`_`），trigger_user 路由的 PendingExpectation 卡片从未到达用户；`confirm_context_fact` 也无 coordinator 处理。HITL 分级路由中仅 doc_author（digest 通知）已接线。
+
+## 二、方案
+
+### 2.1 代码补齐（使「冲突确认卡」真实可达）
+
+1. `internal/bizdev/types.go`：`TaskRunResult` 增加 `PendingContextConflicts []ContextConflictCard`（fact_key/winning_value/prompt/snippet/expectation_id）。
+2. `internal/bizdev/service_task_run.go`：捕获 expectations → 转卡片（≤3，与卡片限额一致）挂到结果（成功与失败路径均挂，裁决与任务成败无关）。
+3. `internal/server`（任务处理器，持有 sessions）：run 完成后若有 PendingContextConflicts 且 req.SessionID 对应活跃会话 → 向该会话追加 assistant 消息（确认卡文案，参照 confirmGate 文案形态）+ 通过 `coordinator.ApplyContextUpdate` 设置 `PendingExpectation`（首个 expectation）+ 经 ctxmgr 落消息记录。
+4. `internal/coordinator`：
+   - 期望命中 `confirm_context_fact`（Intent=CONFIRM_ACTION + pending.TargetAction）：复用 `handleSupplementInfo` 语义——按 payload slots 写黑板（内存 + blackboard.json + OnSupplement 持久化钩子），回复「已采信…」。
+   - `handleDeclineExpectation` 对 `confirm_context_fact`：回复引导用户直接给出正确事实（下一条 SUPPLEMENT_INFO 自然吸收），不再用阶段推进话术。
+
+不改 web（卡片以 chat 消息文案呈现，确认走既有期望命中通道）；不新增迁移；不动 dialoguectx/conflictresolve 已验收逻辑。
+
+### 2.2 dev 运行时验证（关闭条件）
+
+1. `env:dev` 租约下从主目录 rebuild dev（部署当前 dev HEAD）→ 核验 `/health`、`/ready`、`goose_db_version` ≥ 72 且 `context_conflict_adjudications` 存在。
+2. **真实 PI 落盘核验**：真实项目成员对话（含事实陈述）→ 触发任务（真实 PI Runner）→ 核验工作区 `context/dialogue/`（digest.md/turns.md/facts.json/CONFIRMATIONS.md/README）+ TASK.md 导航 + DB 裁决记录。
+3. **冲突确认卡冒烟**：同 key 不同值、30 分钟内、无明确证据词的两条用户对话 → 跑任务 → 会话出现确认卡消息 → 回复「确认」→ 期望命中、黑板更新、回复确认采信。
+
+### 2.3 验证契约对照
+
+- Go/接口变更：单测 + `arch-check --mode block` + `go vet ./...` + `go test -short ./...`。
+- 产品 Agent/工作流：受影响真实 PI 链路（任务注入 + 冲突卡冒烟）。
+- 迁移：dev 实际升级 + schema 版本证据。
+
+## 三、计划
+
+1. [x] 分析进度（本文件§一）
+2. [ ] 代码补齐 §2.1 + 单测
+3. [ ] 工程验证（vet/short/arch-check）
+4. [ ] 候选集成 dev
+5. [ ] dev rebuild + 迁移核验 + 真实 PI 落盘 + 冲突卡冒烟
+6. [ ] 测试报告 + 矩阵行更新（关闭条件满足则升 done，保留 before/after）
+7. [ ] 任务收口 + worktree 清理
+
+## 四、结果登记
+
+（完成后回填）

internal/bizdev/dialogue_inject.go

@@ -127,3 +127,38 @@ func (s *Service) buildDialoguePackageForRun(ctx context.Context, req TaskRunReq
 		ConfirmationsMD: confirmMD,
 	}, expectations, nil
 }
+
+// ContextConflictExpectation rebuilds the chat-side pending expectation for a
+// conflict card projected onto a run result. It mirrors the expectation built
+// during adjudication so the server transport can arm the session without
+// re-running the engine.
+func ContextConflictExpectation(card ContextConflictCard) *intent.PendingExpectation {
+	if card.ExpectationID == "" || card.FactKey == "" {
+		return nil
+	}
+	exp := &intent.PendingExpectation{
+		ExpectationID:    card.ExpectationID,
+		ExpectedIntent:   intent.IntentConfirmAction,
+		TargetAction:     "confirm_context_fact",
+		Prompt:           card.Prompt,
+		AffirmativeWord:  "确认",
+		DeclineWord:      "纠正",
+		ExpiresAt:        time.Now().Add(24 * time.Hour),
+		Payload: map[string]string{
+			"fact_key":      card.FactKey,
+			"winning_value": card.WinningValue,
+			"resolution":    "needs_confirm",
+			"hitl_route":    conflictresolve.RouteTriggerUser,
+		},
+		ContextSnippet:   card.Snippet,
+		AllowAffirmative: true,
+		CreatedAt:        time.Now(),
+	}
+	exp.DefaultOption = &intent.ExpectationOption{
+		OptionID: "accept_winning",
+		Title:    fmt.Sprintf("采信 %s=%s", card.FactKey, card.WinningValue),
+		Intent:   intent.IntentConfirmAction,
+		Slots:    map[string]string{"fact_key": card.FactKey, "value": card.WinningValue},
+	}
+	return exp
+}

internal/bizdev/dialogue_inject_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+package bizdev
+
+import (
+	"testing"
+	"time"
+
+	"chat-agent-system/internal/intent"
+)
+
+func TestAppendContextConflictCards_CapsAndDedupes(t *testing.T) {
+	mk := func(id, key string) *intent.PendingExpectation {
+		return &intent.PendingExpectation{
+			ExpectationID: id,
+			TargetAction:  "confirm_context_fact",
+			Payload:       map[string]string{"fact_key": key, "winning_value": "v-" + key},
+			Prompt:        "p-" + key,
+			ContextSnippet: "s-" + key,
+		}
+	}
+	out := &TaskRunResult{}
+	appendContextConflictCards(out, TaskRunRequest{}, []*intent.PendingExpectation{
+		mk("e1", "device_type"),
+		mk("e2", "device_type"), // duplicate fact key
+		mk("e3", "budget"),
+		nil,
+		{ExpectationID: "other", TargetAction: "other_action"}, // non-conflict expectation
+	})
+	if len(out.PendingContextConflicts) != 2 {
+		t.Fatalf("expected 2 cards after dedupe, got %d", len(out.PendingContextConflicts))
+	}
+	if out.PendingContextConflicts[0].FactKey != "device_type" || out.PendingContextConflicts[1].FactKey != "budget" {
+		t.Fatalf("unexpected cards: %+v", out.PendingContextConflicts)
+	}
+}
+
+func TestContextConflictExpectation_Roundtrip(t *testing.T) {
+	card := ContextConflictCard{
+		ExpectationID: "ctx_conflict_run1_device_type",
+		FactKey:       "device_type",
+		WinningValue:  "一次性使用采血管",
+		Prompt:        "对话与现有事实对「device_type」说法不一致。",
+		Snippet:       "同级时间相近且无明确证据，需人工确认",
+	}
+	exp := ContextConflictExpectation(card)
+	if exp == nil {
+		t.Fatal("expected expectation")
+	}
+	if exp.TargetAction != "confirm_context_fact" || exp.AffirmativeWord != "确认" || exp.DeclineWord != "纠正" {
+		t.Fatalf("unexpected expectation shape: %+v", exp)
+	}
+	if exp.Payload["fact_key"] != "device_type" || exp.Payload["winning_value"] != "一次性使用采血管" {
+		t.Fatalf("payload mismatch: %+v", exp.Payload)
+	}
+	if exp.ExpiresAt.Before(time.Now()) {
+		t.Fatal("expectation must not be expired at creation")
+	}
+	if ContextConflictExpectation(ContextConflictCard{}) != nil {
+		t.Fatal("empty card must return nil")
+	}
+}

internal/bizdev/service_task_run.go

@@ -10,9 +10,11 @@ import (
 	"strings"
 	"time"
 
+	"chat-agent-system/internal/conflictresolve"
 	"chat-agent-system/internal/contracts/vocabulary"
 	"chat-agent-system/internal/docduty"
 	"chat-agent-system/internal/docgov"
+	"chat-agent-system/internal/intent"
 	"chat-agent-system/internal/notification"
 	"chat-agent-system/internal/docrevision"
 	"chat-agent-system/internal/kb"
@@ -643,7 +645,7 @@ func (s *Service) ExecuteTask(ctx context.Context, req TaskRunRequest) (*TaskRun
 		}
 	}
 
-	dialoguePkg, _, dlgErr := s.buildDialoguePackageForRun(ctx, req, blackboardFacts)
+	dialoguePkg, conflictExps, dlgErr := s.buildDialoguePackageForRun(ctx, req, blackboardFacts)
 	if dlgErr != nil {
 		log.Printf("dialogue_ctx_package_failed project_id=%d err=%v", req.ProjectID, dlgErr)
 	}
@@ -682,7 +684,7 @@ func (s *Service) ExecuteTask(ctx context.Context, req TaskRunRequest) (*TaskRun
 	res, err := s.squad.ExecuteTask(ctx, squadReq)
 	if err != nil {
 		if res != nil {
-			return &TaskRunResult{
+			out := &TaskRunResult{
 				TaskKey:       res.TaskKey,
 				ArtifactTitle: res.ArtifactTitle,
 				WorkDir:       res.WorkDir,
@@ -691,12 +693,49 @@ func (s *Service) ExecuteTask(ctx context.Context, req TaskRunRequest) (*TaskRun
 				Success:       false,
 				ErrorReason:   res.ErrorReason,
 				AdvisorBrief:  res.AdvisorBrief,
-			}, err
+			}
+			appendContextConflictCards(out, req, conflictExps)
+			return out, err
 		}
 		return nil, err
 	}
 
-	return s.finalizeSquadDeliverable(ctx, req, res, docID, docRec, appliedProposalID, upstreamSRDoc)
+	outRes, finErr := s.finalizeSquadDeliverable(ctx, req, res, docID, docRec, appliedProposalID, upstreamSRDoc)
+	if outRes != nil {
+		appendContextConflictCards(outRes, req, conflictExps)
+	}
+	return outRes, finErr
+}
+
+// appendContextConflictCards projects trigger_user HITL verdicts onto the run
+// result so the transport layer can surface confirmation cards to the user.
+// Verdicts exist regardless of task success; cards are capped by the engine's
+// MaxCardsPerTask and deduped per (run, fact key).
+func appendContextConflictCards(out *TaskRunResult, req TaskRunRequest, exps []*intent.PendingExpectation) {
+	if out == nil || len(exps) == 0 {
+		return
+	}
+	seen := map[string]struct{}{}
+	for _, exp := range exps {
+		if exp == nil || exp.TargetAction != "confirm_context_fact" {
+			continue
+		}
+		factKey := exp.Payload["fact_key"]
+		if _, dup := seen[factKey]; dup {
+			continue
+		}
+		seen[factKey] = struct{}{}
+		out.PendingContextConflicts = append(out.PendingContextConflicts, ContextConflictCard{
+			ExpectationID: exp.ExpectationID,
+			FactKey:       factKey,
+			WinningValue:  exp.Payload["winning_value"],
+			Prompt:        exp.Prompt,
+			Snippet:       exp.ContextSnippet,
+		})
+		if len(out.PendingContextConflicts) >= conflictresolve.MaxCardsPerTask {
+			break
+		}
+	}
 }
 
 // qualityBlocksControlledProjection 质量门禁未过时禁止任何正式受控投影。

internal/bizdev/types.go

@@ -98,6 +98,19 @@ type TaskRunResult struct {
 	PendingChangeReportID   int64  `json:"pending_change_report_id,omitempty"`
 	PendingRiskLevel        string `json:"pending_risk_level,omitempty"`
 	PendingConfirmationNote string `json:"pending_confirmation_note,omitempty"`
+	// PendingContextConflicts: dialogue-fact conflicts routed to the triggering
+	// user (HITL trigger_user). Server projects them as chat confirmation cards.
+	PendingContextConflicts []ContextConflictCard `json:"pending_context_conflicts,omitempty"`
+}
+
+// ContextConflictCard is the user-facing projection of one needs_confirm
+// adjudication verdict (conflictresolve route trigger_user, card-eligible).
+type ContextConflictCard struct {
+	ExpectationID string `json:"expectation_id"`
+	FactKey       string `json:"fact_key"`
+	WinningValue  string `json:"winning_value"`
+	Prompt        string `json:"prompt"`
+	Snippet       string `json:"snippet"`
 }
 
 // StageRunRequest 运行指定成熟度阶段请求

internal/coordinator/engine.go

@@ -393,6 +393,9 @@ func (e *CoordinatorEngine) ProcessIntent(
 	case intent.IntentRunRestart:
 		coordRes, coordErr = e.handleRunRestart(ctx, top, userCtx)
 
+	case intent.IntentConfirmAction:
+		coordRes, coordErr = e.handleConfirmActionHit(top, userCtx, recRes.Branch)
+
 	case intent.IntentImpactAnalyze:
 		coordRes, coordErr = e.handleImpactAnalyze(ctx, top, userCtx, recRes.RawInput)
 
@@ -400,15 +403,7 @@ func (e *CoordinatorEngine) ProcessIntent(
 		coordRes, coordErr = e.handleRevisePropose(ctx, top, userCtx, recRes.RawInput)
 
 	default:
-		nextExp := BuildNextExpectation(userCtx.Project.CurrentStage, userCtx.Project.Name)
-		coordRes = &CoordinationResult{
-			Status:          StatusAccepted,
-			Intent:          top.Intent,
-			Branch:          recRes.Branch,
-			NaturalReply:    "我已收到您的指示。针对当前项目，请问需要我为您查询进展、补充技术事实，还是推进方案论证？随时吩咐我。",
-			UpdatedContext:  userCtx,
-			NextExpectation: nextExp,
-		}
+		coordRes = e.genericAcknowledgement(top, userCtx, recRes.Branch)
 	}
 
 	if coordErr == nil && coordRes != nil {

internal/coordinator/engine_ctx_conflict.go

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+package coordinator
+
+import (
+	"fmt"
+	"strings"
+
+	"chat-agent-system/internal/intent"
+)
+
+// TargetActionContextFact is the pending-expectation action produced by the
+// dialogue-context conflict adjudication (bizdev buildDialoguePackageForRun).
+const TargetActionContextFact = "confirm_context_fact"
+
+// handleConfirmActionHit serves the CONFIRM_ACTION expectation hit. Today the
+// only async-armed expectation of this shape is the dialogue-context conflict
+// card: confirming absorbs the winning fact into the project blackboard via
+// the supplement-info path (memory + blackboard.json + OnSupplement hook).
+// Unknown or un-armed confirmations fall back to the generic acknowledgement.
+func (e *CoordinatorEngine) handleConfirmActionHit(cand *intent.CandidateIntent, userCtx *UserProjectContext, branch intent.ResolutionBranch) (*CoordinationResult, error) {
+	pending := userCtx.PendingExpectation
+	if pending == nil || pending.TargetAction != TargetActionContextFact {
+		return e.genericAcknowledgement(cand, userCtx, branch), nil
+	}
+
+	factKey := strings.TrimSpace(pending.Payload["fact_key"])
+	factVal := strings.TrimSpace(pending.Payload["winning_value"])
+	if factKey == "" || factVal == "" {
+		userCtx.applyPending(nil)
+		return &CoordinationResult{
+			Status:           StatusAccepted,
+			Intent:           intent.IntentConfirmAction,
+			Branch:           branch,
+			NaturalReply:     "确认卡信息已失效（缺少事实键或推荐值），本次不做黑板变更。如仍有冲突请重新触发任务。",
+			UpdatedContext:   userCtx,
+			ClearExpectation: true,
+		}, nil
+	}
+
+	patched := &intent.CandidateIntent{
+		Intent:        intent.IntentSupplementInfo,
+		Confidence:    cand.Confidence,
+		Branch:        branch,
+		FilledSlots: map[string]string{
+			intent.SlotFactKey:   factKey,
+			intent.SlotFactValue: factVal,
+		},
+		Reasoning: fmt.Sprintf("用户确认对话冲突采信 [%s=%s]", factKey, factVal),
+	}
+	res, err := e.handleSupplementInfo(patched, userCtx)
+	if err != nil || res == nil {
+		return res, err
+	}
+	res.Intent = intent.IntentConfirmAction
+	res.NaturalReply = fmt.Sprintf("✅ 冲突确认完成：已按您的确认采信「%s」=「%s」，并同步项目黑板。\n\n%s", factKey, factVal, res.NaturalReply)
+	return res, nil
+}

internal/coordinator/engine_ctx_conflict_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+package coordinator
+
+import (
+	"strings"
+	"testing"
+
+	"chat-agent-system/internal/intent"
+)
+
+func conflictTestContext() *UserProjectContext {
+	return &UserProjectContext{
+		Project:          ProjectInfo{Name: "便携式掌上超声项目"},
+		BlackboardFacts:  map[string]string{},
+		PendingExpectation: &intent.PendingExpectation{
+			ExpectationID:  "ctx_conflict_run1_device_type",
+			ExpectedIntent: intent.IntentConfirmAction,
+			TargetAction:   TargetActionContextFact,
+			Payload: map[string]string{
+				"fact_key":      "device_type",
+				"winning_value": "一次性使用采血管",
+			},
+			AffirmativeWord: "确认",
+			DeclineWord:     "纠正",
+		},
+	}
+}
+
+func TestConfirmContextFactHit_AppliesWinningFact(t *testing.T) {
+	engine := NewCoordinatorEngine(nil)
+	userCtx := conflictTestContext()
+
+	recRes := &intent.IntentRecognitionResult{
+		Branch: intent.BranchExpectationHit,
+		TopIntent: &intent.CandidateIntent{
+			Intent:      intent.IntentConfirmAction,
+			Branch:      intent.BranchExpectationHit,
+			Confidence:  1.0,
+			FilledSlots: map[string]string{"target_action": TargetActionContextFact},
+		},
+	}
+
+	res, err := engine.ProcessIntent(t.Context(), recRes, userCtx)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("process intent failed: %v", err)
+	}
+	if res.Status != StatusAccepted {
+		t.Fatalf("expected ACCEPTED, got %s", res.Status)
+	}
+	if got := userCtx.BlackboardFacts["device_type"]; got != "一次性使用采血管" {
+		t.Fatalf("blackboard device_type = %q, want 一次性使用采血管", got)
+	}
+	if !strings.Contains(res.NaturalReply, "冲突确认完成") {
+		t.Fatalf("reply should confirm conflict resolution, got: %s", res.NaturalReply)
+	}
+	// The conflict expectation must be replaced by the next-stage expectation
+	// (handleSupplementInfo semantics), never left armed.
+	if userCtx.PendingExpectation != nil && userCtx.PendingExpectation.TargetAction == TargetActionContextFact {
+		t.Fatal("conflict expectation must not stay armed after confirm")
+	}
+}
+
+func TestDeclineContextFact_GuidesCorrection(t *testing.T) {
+	engine := NewCoordinatorEngine(nil)
+	userCtx := conflictTestContext()
+
+	recRes := &intent.IntentRecognitionResult{
+		Branch: intent.BranchExpectationHit,
+		TopIntent: &intent.CandidateIntent{
+			Intent:    intent.IntentDeclineExpectation,
+			Branch:    intent.BranchExpectationHit,
+			IsDecline: true,
+		},
+	}
+
+	res, err := engine.ProcessIntent(t.Context(), recRes, userCtx)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("process intent failed: %v", err)
+	}
+	if !res.ClearExpectation {
+		t.Fatal("expected ClearExpectation")
+	}
+	if !strings.Contains(res.NaturalReply, "正确的事实") {
+		t.Fatalf("decline reply should guide correction, got: %s", res.NaturalReply)
+	}
+	if userCtx.PendingExpectation != nil {
+		t.Fatal("expected PendingExpectation cleared")
+	}
+}
+
+func TestConfirmActionWithoutArmedConflict_FallsBackGeneric(t *testing.T) {
+	engine := NewCoordinatorEngine(nil)
+	userCtx := &UserProjectContext{Project: ProjectInfo{Name: "测试项目"}}
+
+	recRes := &intent.IntentRecognitionResult{
+		TopIntent: &intent.CandidateIntent{Intent: intent.IntentConfirmAction},
+	}
+	res, err := engine.ProcessIntent(t.Context(), recRes, userCtx)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("process intent failed: %v", err)
+	}
+	if res.Status != StatusAccepted || !strings.Contains(res.NaturalReply, "我已收到您的指示") {
+		t.Fatalf("expected generic acknowledgement, got status=%s reply=%s", res.Status, res.NaturalReply)
+	}
+}
+
+func TestConfirmContextFactHit_MissingPayload_Clears(t *testing.T) {
+	engine := NewCoordinatorEngine(nil)
+	userCtx := conflictTestContext()
+	userCtx.PendingExpectation.Payload = map[string]string{}
+
+	recRes := &intent.IntentRecognitionResult{
+		Branch:    intent.BranchExpectationHit,
+		TopIntent: &intent.CandidateIntent{Intent: intent.IntentConfirmAction, Branch: intent.BranchExpectationHit},
+	}
+	res, err := engine.ProcessIntent(t.Context(), recRes, userCtx)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("process intent failed: %v", err)
+	}
+	if !res.ClearExpectation || userCtx.PendingExpectation != nil {
+		t.Fatal("stale card must clear expectation without blackboard change")
+	}
+	if len(userCtx.BlackboardFacts) != 0 {
+		t.Fatal("blackboard must stay unchanged on stale card")
+	}
+}

internal/coordinator/engine_stage.go

@@ -25,6 +25,23 @@ func (e *CoordinatorEngine) handleDeclineExpectation(userCtx *UserProjectContext
 	if projName == "" {
 		projName = "当前项目"
 	}
+	// 对话冲突确认卡的「纠正」：不采信推荐值，引导用户直接给出正确事实；
+	// 下一条 SUPPLEMENT_INFO 会自然吸收并写入项目黑板。
+	if p := userCtx.PendingExpectation; p != nil && p.TargetAction == TargetActionContextFact {
+		factKey := p.Payload["fact_key"]
+		userCtx.applyPending(nil)
+		if userCtx.InteractiveCard != nil {
+			userCtx.dismissCard("cancelled")
+		}
+		return &CoordinationResult{
+			Status:           StatusAccepted,
+			Intent:           intent.IntentDeclineExpectation,
+			Branch:           intent.BranchExpectationHit,
+			NaturalReply:     fmt.Sprintf("好的，暂不采信推荐值。请直接回复正确的事实（例如「%s：一次性使用采血管」），我会立即更新项目黑板。", factKey),
+			UpdatedContext:   userCtx,
+			ClearExpectation: true,
+		}, nil
+	}
 	userCtx.applyPending(nil)
 	if userCtx.InteractiveCard != nil {
 		userCtx.dismissCard("cancelled")
@@ -42,6 +59,20 @@ func (e *CoordinatorEngine) handleDeclineExpectation(userCtx *UserProjectContext
 	}, nil
 }
 
+// genericAcknowledgement is the default branch reply when no specific handler
+// matches the recognized intent.
+func (e *CoordinatorEngine) genericAcknowledgement(top *intent.CandidateIntent, userCtx *UserProjectContext, branch intent.ResolutionBranch) *CoordinationResult {
+	nextExp := BuildNextExpectation(userCtx.Project.CurrentStage, userCtx.Project.Name)
+	return &CoordinationResult{
+		Status:          StatusAccepted,
+		Intent:          top.Intent,
+		Branch:          branch,
+		NaturalReply:    "我已收到您的指示。针对当前项目，请问需要我为您查询进展、补充技术事实，还是推进方案论证？随时吩咐我。",
+		UpdatedContext:  userCtx,
+		NextExpectation: nextExp,
+	}
+}
+
 func (e *CoordinatorEngine) handleSupplementInfo(cand *intent.CandidateIntent, userCtx *UserProjectContext) (*CoordinationResult, error) {
 	factKey := cand.FilledSlots[intent.SlotFactKey]
 	factVal := cand.FilledSlots[intent.SlotFactValue]

internal/server/task_conflict_cards.go

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+package server
+
+import (
+	"context"
+	"fmt"
+	"strings"
+	"time"
+
+	"chat-agent-system/internal/bizdev"
+	"chat-agent-system/internal/chat"
+	"chat-agent-system/internal/coordinator"
+	"chat-agent-system/internal/taskrun"
+)
+
+// projectContextConflictCards surfaces dialogue-context conflict confirmation
+// cards (HITL trigger_user route) to the user who triggered the run:
+//  1. a durable assistant message in the run's chat session (history APIs);
+//  2. the first card armed as PendingExpectation on the live session so a
+//     follow-up「确认/纠正」hits the expectation branch.
+//
+// The adjudication ledger (context_conflict_adjudications) and the workspace
+// CONFIRMATIONS.md remain the authoritative record; this projection is UX.
+func (s *Server) projectContextConflictCards(ctx context.Context, record *taskrun.RunRecord, result *bizdev.TaskRunResult) {
+	if s == nil || record == nil || result == nil || len(result.PendingContextConflicts) == 0 {
+		return
+	}
+	if strings.TrimSpace(record.SessionID) == "" {
+		return
+	}
+	content := renderContextConflictCardMessage(result.PendingContextConflicts)
+
+	if cm := s.ctxMgr(); cm != nil {
+		meta := map[string]any{
+			"run_id":            record.RunID,
+			"project_id":        record.ProjectID,
+			"client_turn_id":    record.ClientTurnID,
+			"ctx_conflict_card": true,
+		}
+		_, _ = cm.RecordUserMessageWithID(ctx, record.SessionID, 0, "assistant", content, "CTX_CONFLICT_CARD", "EXPECTATION_HIT", meta)
+	}
+
+	s.sessionsMu.RLock()
+	sess := s.sessions[record.SessionID]
+	s.sessionsMu.RUnlock()
+	if sess == nil {
+		return
+	}
+	if exp := bizdev.ContextConflictExpectation(result.PendingContextConflicts[0]); exp != nil && sess.UserCtx != nil {
+		_ = coordinator.ApplyContextUpdate(sess.UserCtx, coordinator.ContextUpdate{
+			ExpectedVersion:       sess.UserCtx.Version,
+			SetPendingExpectation: true,
+			PendingExpectation:    exp,
+		})
+	}
+	sess.AppendMessage(chat.Message{
+		ID:        fmt.Sprintf("msg_%d_cc", time.Now().UnixNano()),
+		Role:      "assistant",
+		Content:   content,
+		Timestamp: time.Now(),
+	})
+}
+
+// renderContextConflictCardMessage builds the chat-visible confirmation card
+// text. Reply「确认」accepts the recommended winning value;「纠正」clears the
+// card and the user states the correct fact, which SUPPLEMENT_INFO absorbs.
+func renderContextConflictCardMessage(cards []bizdev.ContextConflictCard) string {
+	var sb strings.Builder
+	sb.WriteString("⚠️ 检测到项目对话与现有事实存在说法冲突，需要您确认：\n\n")
+	for i, c := range cards {
+		sb.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("%d. %s\n   推荐采信：%s = %s\n   依据：%s\n", i+1, c.Prompt, c.FactKey, c.WinningValue, c.Snippet))
+	}
+	sb.WriteString("\n回复「确认」采信推荐值（将同步项目黑板）；回复「纠正」后直接告诉我正确的事实。")
+	return sb.String()
+}

internal/server/task_conflict_cards_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+package server
+
+import (
+	"strings"
+	"testing"
+
+	"chat-agent-system/internal/bizdev"
+	"chat-agent-system/internal/chat"
+	"chat-agent-system/internal/coordinator"
+	"chat-agent-system/internal/taskrun"
+)
+
+func TestProjectContextConflictCards_ArmsSessionExpectation(t *testing.T) {
+	s := &Server{sessions: map[string]*chat.Session{}}
+	sess := chat.NewSession("sess-cc", &coordinator.UserProjectContext{
+		Project:         coordinator.ProjectInfo{Name: "便携式掌上超声项目"},
+		BlackboardFacts: map[string]string{},
+	}, nil, nil)
+	s.sessions[sess.ID] = sess
+
+	record := &taskrun.RunRecord{RunID: "run_1", SessionID: sess.ID, ProjectID: 42}
+	result := &bizdev.TaskRunResult{
+		Success: true,
+		PendingContextConflicts: []bizdev.ContextConflictCard{{
+			ExpectationID: "ctx_conflict_run_1_device_type",
+			FactKey:       "device_type",
+			WinningValue:  "一次性使用采血管",
+			Prompt:        "对话与现有事实对「device_type」说法不一致。",
+			Snippet:       "同级时间相近且无明确证据",
+		}},
+	}
+
+	s.projectContextConflictCards(t.Context(), record, result)
+
+	if sess.UserCtx.PendingExpectation == nil {
+		t.Fatal("expected session PendingExpectation armed")
+	}
+	exp := sess.UserCtx.PendingExpectation
+	if exp.TargetAction != "confirm_context_fact" || exp.Payload["fact_key"] != "device_type" {
+		t.Fatalf("unexpected armed expectation: %+v", exp)
+	}
+	msgs := sess.SnapshotMessages()
+	if len(msgs) == 0 || !strings.Contains(msgs[len(msgs)-1].Content, "确认") {
+		t.Fatalf("expected card message appended, got %+v", msgs)
+	}
+}
+
+func TestProjectContextConflictCards_NoSession_SkipsSilently(t *testing.T) {
+	s := &Server{sessions: map[string]*chat.Session{}}
+	record := &taskrun.RunRecord{RunID: "run_2", SessionID: "sess-missing", ProjectID: 7}
+	result := &bizdev.TaskRunResult{PendingContextConflicts: []bizdev.ContextConflictCard{{
+		ExpectationID: "e", FactKey: "budget", WinningValue: "15万", Prompt: "p", Snippet: "s",
+	}}}
+	s.projectContextConflictCards(t.Context(), record, result) // must not panic
+}
+
+func TestProjectContextConflictCards_EmptySkips(t *testing.T) {
+	s := &Server{sessions: map[string]*chat.Session{}}
+	s.projectContextConflictCards(t.Context(), &taskrun.RunRecord{SessionID: "x"}, &bizdev.TaskRunResult{})
+}
+
+func TestRenderContextConflictCardMessage(t *testing.T) {
+	msg := renderContextConflictCardMessage([]bizdev.ContextConflictCard{{
+		FactKey: "device_type", WinningValue: "一次性使用采血管", Prompt: "冲突提示", Snippet: "同级相近",
+	}})
+	for _, want := range []string{"冲突", "device_type", "一次性使用采血管", "确认", "纠正"} {
+		if !strings.Contains(msg, want) {
+			t.Fatalf("card message missing %q: %s", want, msg)
+		}
+	}
+}

internal/server/task_finalize.go

@@ -40,6 +40,11 @@ func (s *Server) finalizeTaskRun(ctx context.Context, record *taskrun.RunRecord,
 		summaryContent := result.CompletionSummary()
 		s.ingestAssistantReply(ctx, record, summaryContent, status)
 	}
+	// Dialogue-context conflict cards are independent of task outcome; the
+	// OnTerminal hook covers the cmds path, this covers the finalizer path.
+	if s.cmds() == nil {
+		s.projectContextConflictCards(ctx, record, result)
+	}
 	return status, nil
 }
 

internal/server/task_run_handlers.go

@@ -850,4 +850,9 @@ func (s *Server) initTaskRunExecutors() {
 	s.taskRuns().SetFinalizer(func(ctx context.Context, record *taskrun.RunRecord, result *bizdev.TaskRunResult) (string, error) {
 		return s.finalizeTaskRun(ctx, record, result)
 	})
+	if c := s.cmds(); c != nil {
+		c.OnTerminal = func(ctx context.Context, record *taskrun.RunRecord, result *bizdev.TaskRunResult, _ string) {
+			s.projectContextConflictCards(ctx, record, result)
+		}
+	}
 }

internal/taskrun/finalize.go

@@ -69,6 +69,11 @@ type Commands struct {
 	Fav             *artifactvault.Ingest
 	Env             string
 	StorageIdentity string
+	// OnTerminal runs after the terminal projection has been applied exactly
+	// once (CAS-guarded). Optional; used by the server composition to project
+	// extra chat artifacts such as dialogue-context conflict confirmation
+	// cards. Hook errors are best-effort and must not fail finalize.
+	OnTerminal func(ctx context.Context, record *RunRecord, result *bizdev.TaskRunResult, status string)
 
 	mu  sync.Mutex
 	mem map[string]*FinalizeResult
@@ -180,6 +185,9 @@ func (c *Commands) applyLocked(ctx context.Context, record *RunRecord, result *b
 
 	out := &FinalizeResult{Status: want, Manifest: manifest, Applied: true}
 	c.remember(record.RunID, out)
+	if c.OnTerminal != nil {
+		c.OnTerminal(ctx, record, result, want)
+	}
 	return out, nil
 }