Clarify legacy personal settings compatibility
Why: An empty setting scope must not imply shared-project or system authority. Evidence: Documentation-only clarification of the verified scope contract. Impact: No runtime change; retain fail-closed shared settings semantics. Refs: P1, docs/records/2026-10-14-rdm-settings-completion-contract.md
This commit is contained in:
+1
-1
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ const (
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
// SettingScope 声明设置项的写入归属(提案 2026-10-13-rdm-settings-members-duties-perms-increment P2)。
|
||||
// 空串 = 默认:user 与 project 层可写(向后兼容既有 schema)。
|
||||
// 空串保留旧个人配置兼容,不表示共享项目策略或系统管理资格。
|
||||
type SettingScope string
|
||||
|
||||
const (
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user