Why: branches merged into main had left their task cards open; backfill status and archive to prevent bookkeeping debt.
Evidence: feature-llm-robustness.md(PR#165) — merges verified via git log --merges against origin/main.
Impact: .task/*.md moved to .task/archive/ with status backfilled; no code or submodule change.
Refs: task.sh close (card-autoclose-r1)
Why: Acceptance evidence has to live on the card before review and merge.
Evidence: make test and make build both exited 0 after pinning native 9f5751c.
Impact: Task card only.
Refs: feature/llm-robustness
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: The direct path's default retry only works once every repo builds the same model stream.
Evidence: native 9f5751c, squad 9efce79, backend 93adb93.
Impact: Three gitlinks move. No product UI change.
Refs: feature/llm-robustness
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: The card has to state the authorized scope before the pins move.
Evidence: Precheck READY at 8078a3582c.
Impact: Task card only.
Refs: feature/llm-robustness
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: branches merged into main had left their task cards open; backfill status and archive to prevent bookkeeping debt.
Evidence: feature-pi-zcode-second-pass.md(PR#163) — merges verified via git log --merges against origin/main.
Impact: .task/*.md moved to .task/archive/ with status backfilled; no code or submodule change.
Refs: task.sh close (card-autoclose-r1)
Why: Acceptance evidence has to live on the card before review and merge.
Evidence: make test and make build both exited 0 after pinning documents 847f681.
Impact: Task card only.
Refs: feature/pi-zcode-second-pass
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: The stack proposal and the durable note need the v1.0.1 correction before later batches change code.
Evidence: Documents 847f681 adds the second-pass record, the durable correction, and proposal section 2.4.
Impact: Only the documents gitlink moves. No library or product code.
Refs: feature/pi-zcode-second-pass
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: The submodule pull requests landed as merge commits, and the parent pin must include those tips so the composed tree keeps both this fix and the commits that arrived on submodule main.
Evidence: Frontend main is 8be98b4 (contains e4ca2ac); Backend main is 28ccb74 (contains 51b1ff6).
Impact: Dev #161 now pins the commits that are already on each submodule main.
Refs: Frontend #38, Backend #54, Dev #161
Why: The task card is the review record, and it needed the three pull request links once they existed.
Evidence: Frontend #38, Backend #54, and Dev #161 are open.
Impact: Task card only.
Refs: Dev #161
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: Sending a message left the composer on 发送 and hid the live process, because the user message now carries the run id and a refresh had no cursor to replay an open run.
Evidence: make test passed in the worktree. A mock server showed the stop and queue buttons within 250ms, the reply growing before it settled, and the in-progress turn restored after switching away and after reload.
Impact: Frontend and backend gitlinks only, plus this task card. No core contract change.
Refs: Frontend fix/live-run-visibility, Backend fix/live-run-visibility
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: branches merged into main had left their task cards open; backfill status and archive to prevent bookkeeping debt.
Evidence: feature-pi-durable-borrow.md(PR#159) — merges verified via git log --merges against origin/main.
Impact: .task/*.md moved to .task/archive/ with status backfilled; no code or submodule change.
Refs: task.sh close (card-autoclose-r1)
Why: The task card is the same document as the review request, and the pull request links belong on it once they exist.
Evidence: Documents #35, Backend #53, Frontend #37, Dev #159.
Impact: Task card only. Status stays in progress until the owner merges.
Refs: feature/pi-durable-borrow
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: task-sync appends the checkpoint after the card body, which leaves the sync record outside the table.
Evidence: The review checkpoint is sync_base a5c9fd3385, tested_head e8acda76ef, checked_at 2026-10-03T14:39:41Z.
Impact: Task card formatting only.
Refs: feature/pi-durable-borrow
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: The task card has to carry the precheck, task-sync, and test evidence before review.
Evidence: make test and make build exited 0 on 9e46605. task-sync reported sync_base a5c9fd3385 and tested_head 9e466059b9.
Impact: Task card only.
Refs: feature/pi-durable-borrow
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: The review and the four recovery fixes live in the documents, backend, and frontend repositories. The Dev pin is what the combined test runs.
Evidence: Documents 6340900, backend 44aa764, frontend 763c4b4. Each submodule branch is feature/pi-durable-borrow, based on that repository's origin/main.
Impact: Gitlinks only. The pins also move documents, backend, and frontend forward to the main commits that landed after the previous Dev pin.
Refs: feature/pi-durable-borrow
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: The generated card had empty authorization and scope. The task covers a research record plus four backend recovery fixes, and those limits have to be on the card before implementation.
Evidence: make precheck verdict READY at a5c9fd3385; required reading core/baseline.md and workflows/delivery.md §1 completed.
Impact: Task card only. No product code.
Refs: feature/pi-durable-borrow
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: branches merged into main had left their task cards open; backfill status and archive to prevent bookkeeping debt.
Evidence: feature-agent-stack-blueprint.md(PR#151) — merges verified via git log --merges against origin/main.
Impact: .task/*.md moved to .task/archive/ with status backfilled; no code or submodule change.
Refs: task.sh close (card-autoclose-r1)
Why: the proposal branch has to contain current main before it can land. The owner asked for the open proposal pull requests to be merged.
Evidence: origin/main is 508d216. Documents #34 is merged as 76044b5, same tree as 233dfb54, which this branch already pins.
Impact: the blueprint task card and the documents pin stay. Archived cards follow main.
Refs: Dev #151, Documents #34
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: branches merged into main had left their task cards open; backfill status and archive to prevent bookkeeping debt.
Evidence: feature-agent-stack-d1.md(PR#156) — merges verified via git log --merges against origin/main.
Impact: .task/*.md moved to .task/archive/ with status backfilled; no code or submodule change.
Refs: task.sh close (card-autoclose-r1)
Why: the task card has to name the heads that CI will merge.
Evidence: make test exited 0 on bbffa42. make build version string contains native=d84a67c squad=02c0d6a intent=65aaebc backend=0a9a977.
Impact: task card only.
Refs: D1
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: Dev has to record the native head that treats a cancelled stream as aborted, and the squad and backend checkouts that point at it.
Evidence: GOWORK=off go test -count=50 -race ./runtime/llm/ passed on d84a67c.
Impact: gitlinks only. The earlier make test covered the previous pin.
Refs: D1
Why: the acceptance record has to name the heads and the make test result before review.
Evidence: make test exited 0 on e760579. make build version string contains native=33573d0 squad=5e414ff intent=65aaebc backend=5d0097d.
Impact: task card only.
Refs: D1
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
weichen
