Why: establish the authorized task workspace and its initial baseline.
Evidence: preserved precheck receipt in .task/feature-service-restart-recovery-plan.md; R0=5e57029b439e5690f28dc6002f9784f0b08920eb.
Impact: task metadata only; the feature workspace starts at 5e57029b43.
Refs: .task/feature-service-restart-recovery-plan.md
Why: finish the prior session's in-flight records so the tree is clean before the resume precheck (P1.1 object pinning).
Evidence: SELF - documents gitlink now points at 54fc24e (proposal r1 + review record + INDEX); task card carries the prior session's evidence rows and authorization scope.
Impact: task metadata and submodule pointer only; no business code.
Refs: modules/documents/docs/proposals/2026-10-12-service-restart-data-recovery.md
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=555fb2162fe47e13835c592013bc3a69e46239e2.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: AGENTS.md startup gate - this session resumed the task, so a fresh precheck receipt must be recorded before project writes.
Evidence: SELF - receipt /tmp/resume-recovery-plan-20261011.json captured via CMD='make precheck' make evidence; verdict READY at R0 555fb2162f.
Impact: task card evidence row only.
Refs: AGENTS.md 任务启动门禁
Why: the reviewed candidate moves from untracked drafts to a fixed two-repo combination; task card and project index must reference r2 and record the svc-autorecover ownership decision as a human gate.
Evidence: SELF - documents gitlink cbc64eb (r1 pinned at 54fc24e, revised to r2 with SHA256 9cfda252...); resume precheck receipt imported above; task-sync merged origin/main 555fb2162f cleanly.
Impact: task metadata, submodule pointer and index only; no business code, no push/PR.
Refs: modules/documents/docs/records/2026-10-12-service-restart-data-recovery-review.md (round 2)
Why: after task-sync moved backend to 25fbea85 the reviewed gaps needed re-verification, and the svc-autorecover ownership decision needed the actual worktree state rather than the empty card alone.
Evidence: SELF - drift-check receipt (bash /tmp/as-drift-check-20261011.sh) appended via make evidence, exit 0: all cited gaps hold at 25fbea85; svc-autorecover holds 373 lines of uncommitted U2-slice work whose own suite currently fails 5 of 10 tests.
Impact: task card metadata only.
Refs: AGENTS.md 证据与验证门禁
Why: stage-review table, phase line and next-task line must carry the 2026-10-12 approval and vehicle decision.
Evidence: SELF - user decision; documents gitlink advanced to the approval-record commit.
Impact: task metadata and submodule pointer only.
Refs: modules/documents/docs/records/2026-10-12-service-restart-data-recovery-review.md
Why: U2's first slice landed via main (PR #396/#401); the plan card's next-task line must point at the remaining U2 delta instead of the closed task.
Evidence: SELF - documents gitlink advanced; merged main range 555fb2162f..c622372 (96 commits) inspected.
Impact: task metadata and submodule pointer only.
Refs: .task/archive/feature-svc-autorecover.md
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=89174a0f5c28ff7f49c794f37ea7e9528f9b526e.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: the user granted push/PR authorization on 2026-10-12; the card must reflect it and carry the test-segment receipt before requesting review.
Evidence: SELF - make test-pins receipt exit 0 (pins ok; nested development-guidelines warns are pre-existing); precheck and task-sync receipts already in card.
Impact: task card only.
Refs: AGENTS.md 完成声明三段输出
Why: the card is the single master record and must carry the PR links once created.
Evidence: SELF - Documents PR #75 and Dev PR #403 created via API; merge order #75 then #403.
Impact: task card only.
Refs: PR #75#403
weichen
merged commit a1ac948155 into main2026-10-12 02:02:24 +00:00
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Why: 已批准的服务重启与全量数据恢复方案 r2 需要落库：Dev 侧钉住 documents 指针、登记任务卡（含批准与授权记录）并把方案列入 PROJECT 规划索引。
Evidence: SELF —— 完成声明三段收据均在任务卡：precheck（恢复会话，READY，R0 89174a0f5c…经多次 sync 递进）、task-sync（多轮，最终含 origin/main 89174a0）、make test-pins exit 0（嵌套 development-guidelines warn 为既有提示）；外部源码复核与漂移检查收据同卡。CI（GATE，本 PR HEAD 上 make test + make build）为权威验证源。
Impact: modules/documents gitlink → da59ccf（依赖 Documents PR #75 先合入）；.task/feature-service-restart-recovery-plan.md（阶段评审五阶段已批准、推送授权记录）；PROJECT.md 规划索引条目（r2 已批准，U2 首切片已落 main）。无业务代码改动。
Refs: Documents PR #75（方案与审阅记录正文）；实施首任务 feature/recovery-u1-instance-identity。合入顺序：#75 → 本 PR；合入后按 AGENTS 流程 task-finish/task-close。