Why: Acceptance needs the precheck, task-sync, and make test evidence on the card, plus what the three live conversations actually did.
Evidence: make test passed at 5f872f3. The sync row is in the table. The p4 service produced the slot question, one critic rejection, a confirmed plan, and the plugin script artifact.
Impact: Documentation only. The six pull requests stay unmerged.
Refs: feature/agent-harness-p4
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: Dev should record the backend commit that runs a registered script from the launch of that call.
Evidence: go test ./internal/runtime/ -run TestRegisteredWorkflowUsesItsOwnScriptCopy passed.
Impact: Only the backend pointer moves.
Refs: feature/agent-harness-p4
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: Dev should record the backend commit that makes planning return JSON and makes the critic reject a missing line.
Evidence: go test ./internal/runtime/ ./internal/prompts/ passed on that commit.
Impact: Only the backend pointer moves.
Refs: feature/agent-harness-p4
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: The step critic has to call the configured model, and Dev should record that backend commit.
Evidence: go test ./internal/runtime/ -run TestJudgeUsesConfiguredModel passed in the backend repo.
Impact: Only the backend pointer moves.
Refs: feature/agent-harness-p4
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: The live check needs the first draft to miss a line the critic can name, then the retry can add it.
Evidence: The prompt does not mention the marker. maxRetries stays 1.
Impact: demo.brief drafts are rejected until they contain 核对标记：P4.
Refs: feature/agent-harness-p4
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: Dev has to record the Core, Backend, Frontend, UI, and Documents commits that implement intent-to-workflow.
Evidence: make test passed, including boundary lint, core, backend, frontend vitest, UI tsc and vitest, and agent-command.
Impact: agent-native stays at a34689c. The example plugin is already on this branch.
Refs: feature/agent-harness-p4
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: The example plugin needs a bound intent and a plugin-shipped script so the three P4 paths can be checked against a real plugin.
Evidence: TestRepoExamplePluginLoads accepts the plugin, asks 主题是什么？, and keeps the topic slot.
Impact: demo.brief starts the five-step workflow. demo.script stays unbound and needs runtime.workflowScripts.
Refs: feature/agent-harness-p4
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: The task card is the authorization record for intent-to-workflow work, and the routing, retry, and script rulings have to be fixed before code changes.
Evidence: precheck READY at 959179f88f; core/baseline.md and workflows/delivery.md section 1 were read.
Impact: No product code. Six pull requests are the delivery end, and merging them is not authorized.
Refs: feature/agent-harness-p4
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
weichenandCursor