Why: establish the authorized task workspace and its initial baseline.
Evidence: preserved precheck receipt in .task/feature-iterative-delivery.md; R0=f394bcd93bc813433203c5281c79de6865c40944.
Impact: task metadata only; the feature workspace starts at f394bcd93b.
Refs: .task/feature-iterative-delivery.md
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=2147d5cb6566c301eaea3c65448bdda873093aea.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: validate iterative delivery against the latest authoritative component combination.
Evidence: task-sync receipt in the task card records the actual merge and component materialization.
Impact: task evidence only; tests will run on this fixed candidate.
Refs: .task/feature-iterative-delivery.md
Why: preserve test and build evidence before the required clean-tree review synchronization.
Evidence: make test and make build completed on 9454819; the recorded sync refusal preserves the uncommitted-evidence check.
Impact: task evidence only.
Refs: .task/feature-iterative-delivery.md
Why: present a fixed candidate with current test evidence and explicit remaining gates.
Evidence: task-sync confirmed origin/main and local full tests passed; receipts are retained in the task card.
Impact: task metadata only; implementation is unchanged from the tested candidate.
Refs: .task/feature-iterative-delivery.md
Why: archived task cards change directory and must retain an unambiguous policy reference.
Evidence: review finding 1, focused red-green proof and 104 passing governance tests are preserved in the task card.
Impact: use a repository-root text reference; record the completed review and its resolved finding.
Refs: .task/feature-iterative-delivery.md; .task/reviews/iterative-delivery.json
Why: preserve the required current-base check before publishing the reviewed candidate.
Evidence: task-sync refreshed origin/main and materialized the pinned combination.
Impact: task evidence only; the resolved review fix is unchanged.
Refs: .task/feature-iterative-delivery.md
Why: keep the task card and PR body on the same authoritative record.
Evidence: the PR creation receipt records PR 227 and its exact source/base commits.
Impact: task metadata only; CI will verify this final PR head.
Refs: .task/feature-iterative-delivery.md; PR #227
weichen
merged commit 74e4382452 into main2026-10-07 03:16:15 +00:00
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
feature/iterative-delivery 任务卡
任务主记录：PR #227 https://git-home.u1680832.nyat.app:30319/weichen/Agent-System-Dev/pulls/227；状态：已完成（回填）；owner：weichen
基线与授权
权威仓：ssh://git@git-ssh.u1680832.nyat.app:31411/weichen/Agent-System-Dev.git；目标分支：main；R0（initial_base_sha）=
f394bcd93b工作区：/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-iterative-delivery（worktree）；分支：feature/iterative-delivery
授权与交付终点：2026-10-07 本会话，用户在明确收到“连续完成规范修改、任务卡模板及自动闭合钩子调整、测试和代码 Review，再合入并清理本任务 worktree”的范围说明后回复“允许，可以合入”。本次按该授权连续执行至 PR 合入、本任务 worktree 回收及任务卡闭合；不处理其他任务，不变更分支保护、不发布部署。
交付模式：authorized-continuous，仅本任务；授权依据为上述用户原话，非人工逐阶段通过记录。停止条件：测试或 Review 未通过、需扩大需求/权限、未知外部结果、无法确认成果保全。
目标与非目标
将已讨论的逐阶段人工评审与螺旋迭代流程落地到 Dev 项目政策、任务卡实际生成入口和合入钩子。
本轮不新增审批平台，不把模板声明为可信身份认证，不升级通用规范库 gitlink 或改变产品业务行为。
需求表
方案与实施、测试计划
评审与迭代记录
合入、清理与归档
Post-Deploy Monitoring & Validation
No additional operational monitoring required：本次只改开发交付规范、任务模板和本地 Git 钩子，不改变运行服务。
首次主检出 pull/merge 应仅提示闭合待办；若出现隐式提交/推送或模板破坏收据写入，保留现场并修复该入口。
同步记录
f394bcd93bf394bcd93b证据（Evidence）
结果与验证
执行端验证与成果保全
| 同步前验收 |
2147d5cb65|c2ebb47a1c| 2026-10-07T02:53:52Z || 同步前验收 |
2147d5cb65|571eef05e1| 2026-10-07T02:56:28Z || 同步前验收 |
2147d5cb65|14c55def98| 2026-10-07T03:10:35Z |闭合记录（card-autoclose 回填）
收据完整性修复记录
2026-10-07 回填 PR 链接时，整卡文本替换误改了三份红测收据的 output；摘要校验发现不一致。通过本仓 evidence 校验原始仓外收据后，按原 receipt_sha256 原样恢复三个 JSON 块，未重构输出、未改变测试结果或提升来源。后续元数据编辑限定于收据区之前；封存的收据块不参与文本替换。核查和恢复命令输出一并留存。