Why: The first controlled merge queue trial avoided final CI invalidation from normal serial merges, while later Dev merges exposed incomplete shared-window records.
Result: Record the owner-approved Stage 4 design for a controlled second manual trial, with owner opt-in, known Dev main writer coverage, one target window, exact-head CI, recovery, metrics, and acceptance M2-1–M2-6. The Stage 5 implementation and test plan remains separate and pending review.
Evidence: The owner approved design aa4d372 in the task conversation on 2026-10-14. At head 77c8cc2, git diff --check, JSON parse, relative-link check, and current main ancestry passed (SELF). The snapshot is a timestamped SELF observation; first-trial results are linked separately. This repository has no workflow-defined CI (N/A).
Impact: Documents only. No Dev queue activation, CI workflow, branch protection, release, deployment, or takeover of #482/#512.
Why: The first controlled merge queue trial avoided final CI invalidation from normal serial merges, while later Dev merges exposed incomplete shared-window records.
Result: Record the owner-approved Stage 4 design for a controlled second manual trial, with owner opt-in, known Dev main writer coverage, one target window, exact-head CI, recovery, metrics, and acceptance M2-1–M2-6. The Stage 5 implementation and test plan remains separate and pending review.
Evidence: The owner approved design aa4d372 in the task conversation on 2026-10-14. At head 77c8cc2, git diff --check, JSON parse, relative-link check, and current main ancestry passed (SELF). The snapshot is a timestamped SELF observation; first-trial results are linked separately. This repository has no workflow-defined CI (N/A).
Impact: Documents only. No Dev queue activation, CI workflow, branch protection, release, deployment, or takeover of #482/#512.
Refs: Dev queue #518; Documents first-trial report #101; fixed Guidelines merge-queue rule.
Why: The first trial reduced final CI churn, while later Dev merges exposed gaps in shared window records that must be addressed before broadening manual coordination.
Evidence: SELF Gitea API snapshot for PR #539–#548, current #518 comments, protection and open PR states; fixed first-trial report and current project rules reviewed.
Impact: Add a stage-4 design and evidence snapshot only; no queue activation, platform protection change, production task takeover, or workflow edit.
Refs: Dev issue #518; Documents 2026-10-14 merge queue trial report
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Why: The first controlled merge queue trial avoided final CI invalidation from normal serial merges, while later Dev merges exposed incomplete shared-window records.
Result: Record the owner-approved Stage 4 design for a controlled second manual trial, with owner opt-in, known Dev main writer coverage, one target window, exact-head CI, recovery, metrics, and acceptance M2-1–M2-6. The Stage 5 implementation and test plan remains separate and pending review.
Evidence: The owner approved design
aa4d372in the task conversation on 2026-10-14. At head77c8cc2, git diff --check, JSON parse, relative-link check, and current main ancestry passed (SELF). The snapshot is a timestamped SELF observation; first-trial results are linked separately. This repository has no workflow-defined CI (N/A).Impact: Documents only. No Dev queue activation, CI workflow, branch protection, release, deployment, or takeover of #482/#512.
Refs: Dev queue #518; Documents first-trial report #101; fixed Guidelines merge-queue rule.
[WIP] Review controlled manual merge queue expansion designto Record approved manual merge queue expansion design