Why: U7 requires structured regulation citations to be visible in audit and document views.
Evidence: CI success on 7050c91334 (governance); vitest/knip/tsc/vite build passed in the composed layout (SELF).
Impact: New regs audit tab and citation rendering; existing tabs unchanged.
Refs: https://git-home.u1680832.nyat.app:30319/weichen/Agent-System-Frontend/pulls/109
Why: Task card is the PR description.
Evidence: vitest, knip, tsc and vite build passed in the composed layout (SELF); CI pending.
Impact: Card only.
Refs: Agent-System-Dev PR #614
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: the adoption PR is reviewed and its candidate HEAD passed CI; the card closure is folded into the PR so no separate close PR is needed.
Evidence: CI GATE on bc866c4489075b8c2f62063952ff9f3a4f4119a4; independent Review REPLAY (pi --no-session（fresh_session=true，session id not-observable）VERDICT: APPROVE，无阻塞项).
Impact: task card only (moved to .task/archive/).
Refs: https://git-home.u1680832.nyat.app:30319/weichen/Agent-System-Frontend/pulls/105
Why: Phase 6 requires one positive executor run and the negative cases (missing config, bad receipt, out-of-scope path, unknown side effect) before adoption becomes active.
Evidence: .task/evidence/governance-adoption/ (SELF): governance check, agent-exec validate and adoption cases; this commit passed the generated pre-commit hook (admit).
Impact: task card and evidence logs only.
Refs: .task/feature-governance-adoption.md
Why: development-governance-v2 Phase 6 adopts the shared governance kit in every formal repository; the executor needs a valid AGENT-EXECUTION.md before any implementation unit can run.
Evidence: generated by dm-server governance init at Development-Manager bd3a7de57a3a9e1a4495b94c5fa5c08d71e7be8c; dm-server agent-exec validate passes.
Impact: configuration and task card only; no code or CI change yet.
Refs: Agent-System-Dev docs/superpowers/plans/2026-10-16-development-governance-v2-master.md
Why: at 390px the single-pane layout lands on 对话 after login and hides
the whole context sidebar (both sidebar and rail forms); scenario 7 must
switch to the 上下文 pane via the top bar before the entry exists.
Evidence: tsc clean, vitest green, build green (SELF); seven-scenario
rerun to be recorded on the Dev I4 card.
Impact: e2e spec only.
Refs: rollout I4
Why: at 390px the compact layout swaps the sidebar for an icon rail; the
cockpit entry remains reachable as an icon button but not as .tsb-tool,
so scenario 7 timed out waiting for the sidebar form.
Evidence: tsc clean, vitest green, build green (SELF); seven-scenario
rerun to be recorded on the Dev I4 card.
Impact: e2e spec only.
Refs: rollout I4
Why: the cockpit refresh reloaded overview and tree but left the node
detail at its old snapshot, so the 刷新对齐 banner persisted after
refreshing (DV-R05 wants every projection to advance). PanoramaNode now
refetches when the overview snapshotRevision advances. Scenario 4 also
scoped its tree clicks to the 验证主体报告 branch — the unscoped first
caret expanded an unrelated rdm-self doc.
Evidence: tsc clean, vitest green, build green (SELF); seven-scenario
rerun to be recorded on the Dev I4 card.
Impact: cockpit panorama + e2e spec.
Refs: rollout I4
Why: scenario 4 relied on a pending draft proposal advancing the
snapshot watermark, but rdm.draft.propose commits nothing (wm:58 before
and after) and draft adoption is high-danger (client cannot forge
Confirmed). rdm.reqs.import with a unique probe item is a committed
low-danger mutation that advances the watermark — the honest DV-R05
driver.
Evidence: tsc clean, vitest green, build green (SELF); wm 58->60 probe
against the seeded data recorded in session.
Impact: e2e spec only.
Refs: rollout I4
Why: the I4 scenarios assert the version collapsible for a selected
section in the panorama (not only the reader); the panorama node view
had no version block, so .cockpit-versions-toggle never existed there.
Also normalize null list projections in the panorama node detail fetch
(same Go nil-slice issue fixed for the panel earlier).
Evidence: tsc clean, vitest green, build green (SELF); seven-scenario
rerun to be recorded on the Dev I4 card.
Impact: cockpit panorama only.
Refs: rollout I4
Why: rdm.cockpit.node projects empty conflicts as items:null (Go nil
slice) while sources arrive as []; the panel read items.length on null
and crashed, so the conflicts empty state never rendered (I4 e2e
scenario 3).
Evidence: tsc clean, vitest green, build green (SELF); seven-scenario
rerun to be recorded on the Dev I4 card.
Impact: cockpit panel only.
Refs: rollout I4
Why: the local ProjectView interface invented 'id'; rdm.project.list
returns projectId. Every option value was undefined, so auto-select set
pid to undefined and the overview request was never issued — cockpit
showed 加载概览… forever after the project list loaded (I4 e2e scenario 1).
Evidence: tsc clean, vitest green, build green (SELF); network probe shows
rdm.cockpit.overview 200 and .cockpit-stats rendered; seven-scenario rerun
to be recorded on the Dev I4 card.
Impact: cockpit entry only.
Refs: rollout I4
Why: the cockpit rendered the project dropdown with no project selected
and an empty main area — the design's 首屏 default (first visible project
drives the overview) was never implemented; caught by I4 e2e scenario 1
which got past the project list but never saw .cockpit-stats.
Evidence: tsc clean, vitest green, build green (SELF); seven-scenario
rerun to be recorded on the Dev I4 card.
Impact: cockpit entry only.
Refs: rollout I4
Why: #102 rewrote the bare-array fallback into a multi-line callback and
turned 'if (!c) setProjects(...)' into an early 'if (!c) return', which
skips setProjects on the normal (non-cancelled) path — the cockpit then
hangs on 加载中 forever, caught by I4 e2e scenario 1.
Evidence: tsc clean, vitest 324/324, build green (SELF); seven-scenario
browser suite rerun recorded on the Dev I4 card.
Impact: cockpit entry only.
Refs: rollout I4
Why: after login the store's identity epoch and the capability probe each
settle once more; the app closes open workspaces on identity change, so
clicking the sidebar entry too early raced the overlay close (intermittent
加载中 hang, caught across I4 e2e runs).
Evidence: instrumented probe (rows=2 parsed then overlay closed on identity
bump); settled-login rerun follows on the Dev I4 card.
Impact: spec stability only.
Refs: rollout I4
Why: rdm.project.list returns { projects: [...] }; the cockpit component
assumed a bare array and always rendered 暂无可见研发项目, caught by I4 e2e
scenario 1.
Evidence: tsc/vitest/build green (SELF); browser e2e rerun recorded on the
Dev I4 card.
Impact: cockpit entry only.
Refs: rollout I4
Why: TaskSidebar builds its own workspace entry list without the cockpit
flag, so the 文档驾驶舱 entry never appeared in the sidebar even when the
command probe passed (caught by I4 e2e scenario 1).
Evidence: tsc/vitest/vite build green (SELF); cockpit e2e suite re-run via
Dev scripts/e2e.sh follows on the Dev I4 card.
Impact: sidebar entry visibility only; no behavior change elsewhere.
Refs: rollout I4
Why: implement the reviewed I4 browser acceptance - seven scenarios over the
cockpit: first-entry stats/tree/panorama, tree-section reader positioning on
the shared selection, four evidence tabs with counts and honest empty/
restricted states, pending-probe adoption via in-session API then refresh
(snapshot and version block advance together, DV-R05), route-abort outage
keeping the previous snapshot with a retry entry (DV-R08), non-member
account sees no projects (DV-R06 negative), and 390px/18px/keyboard/reduced-
motion usability (DV-R07).
Evidence: tsc green; suite driven by Dev scripts/e2e.sh (seed: cockpit-e2e
structure YAML via the structure-content loader, pending probe proposal,
non-member account); GATE is the Dev-side e2e.sh run recorded on the Dev I4
card.
Impact: e2e spec only; no product source change.
Refs: rollout I4
Why: I3 adds the reader/evidence-panel module whose contract types
(documentCockpit.ts) are consumed by tests and the I4 combination work; the
repo's knip ratchet exists for exactly this deliberate, documented raise.
Code paths themselves reduced first (attempted de-export churned unrelated
surface, reverted in favor of the baseline bump).
Evidence: knip 51 <= 51 via scripts/check-knip.mjs; vitest 324/324; tsc and
vite build green.
Impact: baseline file only.
Refs: rollout I3
Why: implement the reviewed I3 increment - continuous body reading with
per-section status lines, version summary with collapsed line-diff (backend
versions projection from RDM PR #420), right evidence panel with
sources/history/impacts/conflicts tabs, panorama-reader positioning on the
shared selection, per user+project view preferences (panorama/reader,
density, panel tab), strict-seq history merging and honest restricted states.
Evidence: 10 new pure-logic tests (prefs validation, version summary and
diff marks, strict history merge drops, reader assembly three-state); vitest
324/324 green; tsc and vite build green; tokens-only styles.
Impact: cockpit-only; no fourth column, no standalone graph (relations stay
in the right panel); reader entry is explicit (panorama button / view toggle).
Refs: rollout I3
Why: the 400 (unknown field name) outage shipped because no automated
check drove the UsersPanel create path against the strict backend
contract; this scenario pins the request body, the pending notice, the
table row state and the CLI handoff hint into the composition suite.
Evidence: passing run against the deployed shared dev (SELF, task card).
Impact: e2e/ only; no production code.
Refs: backend 8dfc223, frontend #94
Why: implement the reviewed I2 increment - statistics band, structure tree
with lazy section pages, panorama center (project overview + node summary),
shared selection/filter, snapshot-consistency banner and honest states, per
the frozen contract (Dev docs/superpowers 2026-10-16, rollout section 7).
Evidence: vitest 314/314 green (14 new pure-logic tests covering capability
gate, true-zero vs unavailable stats, filter toggle, snapshot equality and
update notice, context key, selection survival, honest badges); tsc -b and
vite production build green.
Impact: new workspace entry (rdm-cockpit, gated on the seven cockpit
commands); no changes to existing surfaces; reader view and right panel
land in I3.
Refs: rollout I2
Why: the forced password gate still submitted an empty current password
after the backend began requiring it (current_required), locking every
account seeded with an initial password out of the workbench, and the
admin user panel had no client for the owner-confirmed recovery
proposal contract that replaced one-time key issuing (HTTP 410).
Evidence: npm test 300 passed; tsc -b && vite build ok; knip issues
54 <= baseline 55 (SELF).
Impact: mode-aware ChangePasswordGate with current-password input,
admin recovery proposal panel, owner-side account settings section,
recovery proposal client methods; no backend changes.
Refs: backend 8dfc223, b9c0a34; frontend #94
Why: independent review flagged the issue client still targeting the 410
endpoint and a hint sentence ending with a period.
Evidence: npm run build + npm test re-run on the fix (SELF).
Impact: api client surface only.
Refs: review brief /tmp/review-brief-admin-user-contract.md
Why: backend 8dfc223 replaced POST /api/admin/users with strict
{owner, profile} decoding and returned 410 for login-key issuing, so the
UI create form failed with 400 unknown field name. Creation now sends
{owner, profile:{name}} only; password input, admin checkbox and the
login-key issue entry are removed; notice points to the local CLI
initialize-account flow. passwords.ts lost its only consumer.
Evidence: npm run build + npm test (34 files/293 passed) + knip identical
to baseline on the task worktree (SELF).
Impact: UsersPanel and api client only; no style/token changes.
Refs: backend 8dfc223, b9c0a34
Why: S9 acceptance finding 3 — the project settings modal exposed the
host override settings (including the model/key group, masked) to plain
project members; the duties data plane was already permission-enforced,
but the host settings surface had no gate.
Evidence: vitest 34 files / 293 tests pass with the change; tsc reports
no errors in the modified file. Ruling per the acceptance plan P1-B:
the modal entry stays (granted duty managers need the RDM tabs), while
the host override settings group renders only for the project owner or
a system admin; RDM tabs keep their own fail-closed gating.
Impact: ProjectSettingsModal project tab renders an explanatory empty
state for non-privileged viewers; members/duties/matrix tabs unchanged.
Refs: S9 acceptance report P1-B
weichen
