Why: The local initiative branch merged main without its own remote advance (8 commits: W3-rest delivery, stage-6 approval, PR #641 merge); combining both keeps the branch history complete.
Evidence: git rev-list HEAD..origin/feature/rdm-two-trees-followup drops to 0 after this merge; card shows W3-rest approved and folded.
Impact: Branch bookkeeping only; no source changes.
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=7e6c544b3c25c510e3d928bfb4515937a1cd6696.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=adbef2f49c6c252a09449496afbdb6685201993b.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: independent re-review of the receipt pass-through fix passed with no blockers.
Evidence: reviewer replay of live eval and runtime tests on 16f98b8
Impact: task card and review package only.
Refs: docs/superpowers/specs/2026-10-20-fast-slow-o2-i2-review.md
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: The user approved O2 I1 at stage 6 on 2026-10-20, accepted the C2 numbering, and asked to start I2.
Evidence: Agent-Native #48 merged at 2fc66be after head 899fd70 status success; merged tree 720ec93 matches the pre-merge merge-tree.
Impact: Task card and review package only.
Refs: Agent-Native#48, Agent-System-Dev#647
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: O2 I1 is implemented in Agent-Native #48 and needs user stage 6 review before merge.
Evidence: Worker attempt 2 success at 899fd70; host vet and tests (with -race) pass; PR #48 CI success; independent review PASS with no blocking issues.
Impact: Task card and review package only; Agent-Native #48 stays draft until stage 6 approval.
Refs: Agent-Native#48, Agent-System-Dev#639
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: The user approved the W3 remainder at stage 6 on 2026-10-20 and authorized merging RDM #451 into RDM main.
Evidence: RDM #451 merged at 76b4c05 after head f3fa0c0 status success; merged tree 4cfacf16 matches the pre-merge merge-tree.
Impact: Task cards and review package only; W4 write entry points must first add node placement checks.
Refs: Agent-System-RDM#451, Agent-System-Dev#641
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: W3 remainder is implemented on RDM draft PR #451 and needs the user's stage 6 review before merging into the initiative.
Evidence: RDM f3fa0c0 target tests and domain/rdmapp packages pass locally (SELF); fresh-session review PASS-with-fixes with no blocking findings.
Impact: task cards and review docs only; placement checks recorded as a W4 write-entry prerequisite.
Refs: feature/rdm-two-trees-followup-w3-rest, RDM PR #451
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: user chose O2 in the completion signal evaluation; stage 4/5 docs precede any code.
Evidence: read-only code location in Agent-Native runtime/llm and Backend runtime (SELF).
Impact: docs only; no product code, no paid requests.
Refs: docs/superpowers/specs/2026-10-19-fast-slow-completion-signal-evaluation.md
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=2b7fdc39a1f44163f4766701429d61ffd6926f1a.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: The two-trees follow-up initiative needs its first increment (W0 catalog
guard, dynamic svc test ports, W3 gap check) packaged for user stage 6 review.
Evidence: Targeted unittest run on 000a2d2 recorded in the task card (SELF);
PR CI on the final HEAD is the GATE.
Impact: Task card and review spec only; implementation landed via agent-exec
transport 000a2d2.
Refs: .task/feature-rdm-two-trees-followup.md
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=7716b28cfff5200e7cfe9ec75aff5bcd71b234ed.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Set up the task card and approved implementation plan for environment-configured super-admin.
Evidence: make precheck and task-start validated.
Impact: Establishes task metadata and implementation baseline.
Refs: #0
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=d9ac28f89159e17781e2a8ef3094965130f29d2f.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=eef7e5e778cabcb6216f74b74213a3d7511f383b.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Keep the approved plan accessible after task worktrees are recycled and mark all child delivery results.
Evidence: Plan snapshot matches original bytes; U6 #624 merged as 84aa411 with exact-head CI success.
Impact: Task and plan metadata only; final main verification remains pending.
Refs: PR #616
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=ba81d638a6c845d0acde6896f4001bed096ba26c.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: RDM settings completion is split into phases; phase 1a covers the
Picker hardening, R2 member search and the acceptance false PASS fix
that do not conflict with IAM U4.
Evidence: plan and card only; no implementation in this commit.
Impact: none on runtime.
Refs: .task/feature-rdm-settings-phase1a.md
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: RDM and Frontend units must implement one citation interface.
Evidence: Derived from the merged U6 evidence batch model (RDM 703e41d) and current cockpit/inspect read models.
Impact: Spec only.
Refs: docs/superpowers/plans/2026-10-18-regulations-knowledge-base-plan.md U7
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: U1 of the regulations KB plan requires a verified import inventory before any schema or ingestion work.
Evidence: dump sha256 matches manifest; 2878/2907 originals hash-verified in a disposable pgvector container (SELF).
Impact: Spec only; no corpus data or product code changed.
Refs: docs/superpowers/plans/2026-10-18-regulations-knowledge-base-plan.md U1
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: closure re-review (head ad4485e) left the per-repo evidence sentence as an unlabelled universal claim; the API check missed Agent-System-UI (15 archived cards, not 14).
Evidence: Gitea contents API on Agent-System-UI main (SELF); PR #604 run 3694 job logs for the flaky backend tests.
Impact: docs/superpowers/plans and .task only.
Refs: PR #604
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: closure re-review (head d2fb19a) blocked the bare claim that every adoption card was archived.
Evidence: Gitea contents API on each repo main (SELF): 14 archived adoption cards, no open ones; Guidelines records adoption in policy/guidelines-adoption.md (PR #9).
Impact: docs/superpowers/plans and .task only.
Refs: PR #604
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: independent review blocked a869453: CLOSED asserted cleanup of other repos without evidence and before this PR's own merge/cleanup; the archived card kept template placeholders.
Evidence: review output /tmp/review-gov-dev-closed.out (VERDICT BLOCK, SELF-held, out of tree).
Impact: docs/superpowers/plans and .task only; no code.
Refs: PR #604
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: Phase 6 adoption PRs merged across the formal repositories; the master record still showed PLANNED rows.
Evidence: merge commits and main CI per repository (GATE, Gitea statuses); make test-governance 421 tests OK on 2b2268f (SELF).
Impact: planning record and task card evidence only.
Refs: docs/superpowers/plans/2026-10-16-development-governance-v2-master.md
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: Guidelines PR #9 review repairs ran through the shared executor; repair-r2 fail-stopped and was redone as r3.
Evidence: docs/superpowers/plans/evidence/guidelines-adoption/03-04 (SELF): governance check --guidelines-self and agent-exec validate on 7cafc7d.
Impact: planning record and evidence only.
Refs: docs/superpowers/plans/2026-10-17-guidelines-governance-adoption.md
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: Development-Guidelines stores no process records (CONTRIBUTING.md), so its Phase 6 adoption card and evidence live with the governance master record in Dev.
Evidence: docs/superpowers/plans/evidence/guidelines-adoption/00-02 (SELF): governance check --guidelines-self, agent-exec validate, adoption cases ALL PASS.
Impact: planning records only.
Refs: docs/superpowers/plans/2026-10-16-development-governance-v2-master.md
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=dc01517de1cfb86abbd26dfb7932023763019d5d.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: the Python executor was retired through the shared executor and Phase 5/7 states changed (DM #17/#18 merged, Phase 6 pilot started).
Evidence: make test-governance 421 tests OK (SELF, card evidence); git grep finds no live Python executor reference.
Impact: task card and master record only.
Refs: .task/feature-dev-shared-executor-switch.md; DM PR #17, #18, #19
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=682a4e8263fe007cb102fc9deaf71bda514ee387.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: The master record still showed Phases 0-4 as PLANNED after they merged.
Evidence: Dev main aee351a/682a4e8, Guidelines main 2688fd2, DM main 183e764, PR #585/#595/#596/#597.
Impact: Plan document only.
Refs: development-governance-v2
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: Phase 5-7 depend on how repositories obtain the shared executor and how CI reads private submodules.
Evidence: Owner answers on 2026-10-17; DM secret list shows SUBMODULE_TOKEN (SELF).
Impact: Governance master plan only.
Refs: docs/superpowers/plans/2026-10-16-development-governance-v2-master.md
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: the task card claimed all units complete while confirmed blocking defects remain in triage and the Guidelines contract.
Evidence: review of task.sh triage (count-based JOIN, local-only scan) and Guidelines PR #7 diff; CI runs 3417/3419 apply only to superseded objects.
Impact: initiative stops accepting requirements; status uses the PLANNED..CLOSED model; remaining phases tracked in one master record.
Refs: PR #585, Guidelines PR #7
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why:
Provide phased rollout roadmap (Phases 1-5) for stock repositories and mandatory defaults for new projects under governance v2.
Evidence:
Specification documented in docs/superpowers/specs/2026-10-16-stock-repos-adoption-matrix.md.
Impact:
Clarifies U6 and U7 governance deliverables for multi-repo rollout without ambiguity.
Refs:
feature/development-governance-v2
weichen
