Why: The third independent review found incomplete sentence, revised count and same-source scope shortcuts.
Evidence: New counterexamples failed before Backend 3f0141d and passed after; exact prior review failures and mechanisms remain recorded in Documents 53b1abd.
Impact: Advance Backend and Documents draft pins; paid model quality remains NOT_RUN.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend PR #193; Documents PR #95
Why: Independent review found three unsupported-claim paths in the prior candidate.
Evidence: Each source-context, scope and unstructured-placement counterexample failed before repair; Backend full Go and selected fake-stream tests passed after.
Impact: Advance Backend 9019f90 and preserve the failed review plus exact prior combination receipt; revalidation follows on the new SHA.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend PR #193; r0.3 review P1 findings
Why: The approved candidate must record the latest authoritative main before independent review.
Evidence: make task-sync exit 0 with sync_base 415f9ac; full SELF receipt imported by make evidence.
Impact: Task evidence only; source components unchanged and current-head combination remains to be run.
Refs: Dev PR #512; r0.3 evidence implementation plan Task 4
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=415f9ac58ece9d9b63bd9b3fea39978bb847fcce.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: The review candidate needs fixed browser results and a durable validation report.
Evidence: Tool-imported two-pass real HTTP fake-stream Playwright receipt on Dev b10a218; owned mechanism and preview processes were stopped.
Impact: Pin Documents 21fbc9d and record mechanism PASS separately from still-unrun real-model quality.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Documents PR #95
Why: The real HTTP gate now checks the host-generated pending relationship alongside source recovery and reading focus.
Evidence: Fixed Dev combination on f7e55c3 passed with imported SELF receipt; the new browser assertion failed on the old fixture, then Backend selected fake-stream tests passed.
Impact: Update test-only Backend/Frontend components and preserve the first browser RED; new exact-head browser and combination gates follow.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend #193; Frontend #79
Why: The first exact Dev r0.3 combination failed the Frontend unused-export ratchet despite passing runtime tests.
Evidence: The failed SELF receipt is imported into the task card; regenerated Frontend knip 51 <= 52, UI knip 61 <= 61 and component build/typechecks pass.
Impact: Pin Core, Backend, Frontend and UI corrections without changing the evidence wire shape; full Dev combination follows on this HEAD.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Core #31; Backend #193; Frontend #79; UI #51
Why: The zero-paid candidate needs an auditable source, database and prompt-size record before exact-head combination testing.
Evidence: Tool-imported isolated PostgreSQL and offline size receipts; Component tests are identified as local SELF in the task card.
Impact: Evidence and state text only; paid A01 remains NOT_RUN.
Refs: Dev PR #512; r0.3 evidence implementation plan Task 4
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=e793e9804a1f5ecf49b29a40b4baac90ceb04e55.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Preserve independent final review and current-source equivalence before platform admission.
Evidence: Final document and integration metadata review has zero findings; full composition test and source equivalence receipts are retained with precise SELF object boundaries.
Impact: Delivery evidence only; no production, provider, guideline or document changes from the reviewed candidate.
Refs: IAM I1 integration task; Documents 98/99; RDM 360/362.
Why: The approved r0.3 candidate now has Core evidence types, Backend normalization and matching generated frontend/UI contracts.
Evidence: Core and Backend full Go suites, selected live-tag fake-provider tests, UI 165 tests/typecheck, Frontend 265 tests/build and recursive worktree verification passed locally; final Dev combination follows on this exact commit.
Impact: Advance the five component gitlinks in the existing draft; no paid model call, merge or deployment.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Core #31; Backend #193; Frontend #79; UI #51; Documents #95
Why: Preserve actual component merge results and current delivery authorization before integration CI.
Evidence: RDM PR 360 merged at exact successful CI head; new Dev make test passed and independent metadata checks preserved approved digests and pins.
Impact: Clarify historical task records and current approved repair scope; preserve documentation and delivery evidence only.
Refs: Documents PRs 98 and 99; RDM PRs 360 and 362; IAM I1 task record.
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=1e5c6b9c10ba77ed34663fd670138621a17342bd.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Carry the actual merged contract and approved permission implementation boundary into the integration composition.
Evidence: Documents PR 99 merged as a7ff466d9ae91fc67a53d2bf4991f47fc63a2a4c after independent review and verified source digest; RDM PR 360 preserves actual-actor projection semantics.
Impact: Update documentation pin, navigation and delivery records only; new composition tests and final-head CI remain required.
Refs: IAM I1 permission contract section 8; Documents PRs 98 and 99; RDM PR 360.
Why: the user confirmed acceptance in conversation on 2026-10-13; the archived
card should carry the verdict with an honest source label.
Evidence: user confirmation (conversation reply); automated ten-scenario replay
25/25 PASS rows on this card and PR #529.
Impact: archived task card note only.
Refs: task feature/rdm-increment-settings-duties (archived via #532).
Why: The user approved zero-paid implementation after the written plan review, and the first main sync required component conflict resolution.
Evidence: Tool-imported first-sync failure and resolved-sync SELF receipts; Backend full Go and Frontend test/build results are recorded as local checks.
Impact: Pin Documents approval status and preserve the exact merge/sync trail; paid A01 remains unauthorized.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Documents PR #95
Why: The approved r0.3 plan must run against the current project member and IAM mainline.
Evidence: First task-sync conflict receipt was imported; Backend full Go tests and Frontend test/build passed after resolving component interactions; git diff --cached --check passed.
Impact: Combine current main with the existing U3 draft, preserving both planning entries and the Backend private project event proof transaction.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend PR #193; Frontend PR #79; Documents PR #95
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=5efbeebbdc09f8c2484613230a29c882c54652f0.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=5efbeebbdc09f8c2484613230a29c882c54652f0.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Record user acceptance and use the actual merged permission contract in the integration composition.
Evidence: Documents PR 98 merged as 3cf263962bd106529ee0531c8415cb16eecedfe3; independent document review and full SELF receipts retained in the task record.
Impact: Advance only Documents and delivery evidence; full IAM later increments and deployment remain outside scope.
Refs: Documents PR 98; IAM I1 U1-U2; policy/delivery.md stages 8-9.
Why: branches merged into main had left their task cards open; backfill status and archive to prevent bookkeeping debt.
Evidence: feature-rdm-increment-settings-duties.md(PR#529) — merges verified via git log --merges against origin/main.
Impact: .task/*.md moved to .task/archive/ with status backfilled; no code or submodule change.
Refs: task.sh close (card-autoclose-r1)
Why: branches merged into main had left their task cards open; backfill status and archive to prevent bookkeeping debt.
Evidence: feature-d1-closeout-evidence.md(PR#517) — merges verified via git log --merges against origin/main.
Impact: .task/*.md moved to .task/archive/ with status backfilled; no code or submodule change.
Refs: task.sh close (card-autoclose-r1)
Why: The reviewable plan needs a fixed Dev combination and complete tool-written verification receipt.
Evidence: make test && make build exit 0 on Dev 73bb827; SELF receipt 02567630b483ace3feaa12e227d50de63205d76fe76e6ac266085dbda50b7535 imported by make evidence.
Impact: Task evidence only; r0.3 semantic implementation and paid quality remain NOT_RUN.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Documents PR #95
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=5aae47ebca20ad1f3add3b080212cca7e1c6edf9.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Preserve the user-approved stage-7 conclusion before the final merge candidate is frozen.
Evidence: Import original precheck, sync, build, CI and independent replay receipts; validate current fixed components, document links and the incoming acceptance script syntax through make evidence.
Impact: Update this task card only; preserve implementation and activation boundaries. New HEAD CI remains required before merge.
Refs: Dev PR #519; Guidelines PR #5; Documents PR #96; queue Issue #518
Why: The r0.2 real-model sample failed semantic quality, and the user approved the r0.3 written design for detailed planning.
Evidence: Prior r0.2 A01 report and imported SELF receipts remain in the task card; plan self-review and git diff --cached --check passed.
Impact: Pin Documents f608ae5 and update planning state; implementation and paid model trials remain gated.
Refs: Documents PR #95; Dev PR #512
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=5aae47ebca20ad1f3add3b080212cca7e1c6edf9.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=69c5c84d8a2f1a7966ebfb809cbb26d54e8e8abb.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=69c5c84d8a2f1a7966ebfb809cbb26d54e8e8abb.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: The failed A01 needs a documented next design while the six PRs remain draft and unmerged.
Evidence: Independent semantic FAIL and the committed r0.3 spec with resolved links and explicit no-paid/no-implementation boundary.
Impact: Project entry and task card point to a pending design review; no new semantic behavior is enabled.
Refs: U3 r0.2 A01 assessment, r0.3 design
Why: The first rerun stopped at the dirty-worktree guard while the serial rerun completed both test and build.
Evidence: make evidence imported exit-0 receipt 3ea47713 at Dev f8c7650; original exit-2 receipt remains.
Impact: The failed model quality decision is unchanged and current-head GATE remains pending.
Refs: U3 r0.2 A01 assessment
Why: Final fixed Documents composition and current modules passed their checks and now require the user acceptance decision.
Evidence: Complete SELF make test and document checks passed at4af5956; receipt5e81c91e and the independent RDM replay subjects are retained.
Impact: Record-only checkpoint after user stage 6 approval; do not claim stage 7 approval or shipping.
Refs: I1 bounded acceptance; policy/delivery.md
weichen