Why: Review found stale-source, direct-command, native-tool, and clarification-watermark bypasses in the earlier Backend pin.
Evidence: Backend 5ccbe8f passes the full Go test and build suites after closing those paths.
Impact: The Dev combination records the fail-closed project work and W4b host contract for later exact-head replay.
Refs: TT-N03 TT-R01 W4b
Why: The combination result and the planning status need to live with the same task, without treating local verification as a merge.
Evidence: SELF receipt edb81a90 records make test && make build at exit 0. Documents af5093d records what remains NOT_RUN.
Impact: Reviewers can see the implemented chain, the local evidence, and that sync, CI, and deployment have not happened.
Refs: W4b human confirmation design r1
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: Structure confirmation needs the fixed backend component, and that component's project-context imports have to be visible in the architecture baseline.
Evidence: SELF make test && make build exited 0 with backend a4d6404. The first pin attempt failed the architecture ratchet and the store compatibility count; both are fixed in this pin.
Impact: Dev now builds against the human decision schema. Delivery sync, CI, and deployment are still outstanding.
Refs: W4b human confirmation design r1
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: Dynamic structure confirmation needs a trusted one-time human proof before RDM may apply a proposal.
Evidence: Design SHA256 66c1bb8a1f7c1d0be3a1fe1181541b3e490c52a8a5601c3eb6410cabe2442b10; make test SELF receipt 0f96e34821b1f88ca6c8e849e28f73bc19991f13ad563940ec8e6bb2a71b9851.
Impact: Save the review candidate and exact Documents pin; W4b writes remain blocked pending the required design review while W3 continues.
Refs: TT-D02, TT-D03; W4b human confirmation design adjustment r1
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=99119a733830bc120cd6747b8b61736ea6da6078.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: The goal now includes two approved work-source and risk requirements with a reviewed stage-five implementation path.
Evidence: Stage-four approval call_a6853c4232f34285a6cbae19dfbeeec5; stage-five approval call_497a8a4c28bd4231a2cfd63d84375f2a; document checker SELF receipt f4a4cdde2d3ad9b250742da764455a1304e1e26f07270da4f0d37ad6ed8b6c7e.
Impact: Pin the Documents record and task-card authorization; product capability remains subject to implementation and tests.
Refs: TT-N03, TT-R01; Documents 10508d1
Why: The authoritative target advanced while this task recorded approved source and risk requirements.
Evidence: Documents HEAD merges both the task branch and incoming 46506aec34a8803d1b7f4de1a048de9dba591da2 pin; the staged superproject diff has no whitespace errors.
Impact: Include upstream task cards, Backend pin, governance changes, and this task Documents branch without rewriting approved records.
Refs: task-sync; stage 4 work observation review
Why: Save the approved scope expansion, reviewable X3 design, and local combination evidence before synchronizing the authoritative target.
Evidence: Stage-three amendment was approved by the user; fixed stage-four document hash c9edb25c1decbbcb31220ef0cec8703c37e4aaa87bee31eb308169000b335d8c passed link/hash checks and the Documents combination passed make test with SELF receipt 77c20093727a7748f807fb7c22d523e416ca649b98fa839ec48ecd47290223c3.
Impact: Task record and Documents pointer only; X3 public API and product behavior remain unimplemented pending manual stage-four and five review.
Refs: TT-N03, TT-R01; stage 4 addendum
Why: Dev main advanced with a vendor skills task while this UI combination was being verified.
Evidence: Backend main ead5ade contains both Backend #199 and #200; the component merge affects recipes, not run-history handlers.
Impact: Preserve the new main task card and pin the Backend merge containing both changes; combination checks follow on this head.
Refs: Agent-System-Dev #550; Agent-System-Backend #199 and #200
Why: The fast and slow channel UI duplicated work cards and hid intermediate output after the final reply.
Evidence: SELF isolated-network make test and make build; 15 browser scenarios; independent component review; component PRs #55, #199, #85.
Impact: Pin merged Backend, Frontend and UI revisions and update DESIGN.md for one detail location and durable folded history.
Refs: .task/feature-work-companion-visibility.md; Agent-System-UI #55; Agent-System-Backend #199; Agent-System-Frontend #85
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=3538d40f45ad5a7c779426eb3322f79751db380c.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Documents PR (feature/dhf-plan-progress-note) corrects the stale
WIP/stage-8 wording in the DHF plan progress note; the Dev combo must
pin the updated Documents commit so combined verification covers it.
Evidence: task card records make test exit 2 (transient lock-probe flake
in test_recover_skips_when_lock_held, single rerun OK) then exit 0 on
rerun; make build and task-sync receipts follow in later commits.
Impact: gitlink moves 6619835 -> 46506ae (Documents PR head); note-only
doc change, no code paths affected.
Refs: Documents PR feature/dhf-plan-progress-note; Dev task card
feature-dhf-plan-progress-note
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=7e9ebdea5055a63c713ccc0fb1f938ffe35a6b9d.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=11aa76a3bc1c5047791f9a2de154e451634b6567.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Save the reviewed stage 6 boundaries, component probes, dependency state, and service fixture evidence before current-main synchronization.
Evidence: Complete working-combination make test exited zero after isolated-port fixture repair; earlier failures and original SELF receipts remain recorded in the task card.
Impact: Local checkpoint only; no product acceptance, PR, release, deployment, or real database migration.
Refs: stage 6 W4a, W6, W9; approved time-contract SHA256 d78849440e6346482fc09925d402790a7ad257ef76c85275610046a845a45f37
Why: Stage 8 review found that the main plan still described the approved increment as a draft.
Evidence: Documents commit 6619835 adds a dated status note without changing the approved plan body; the first pre-commit combination check correctly rejected the uncommitted pin drift.
Impact: Dev now records the exact Documents component SHA for renewed combination validation.
Refs: Documents PR #102; Dev PR #540; DHF U1 Stage 8 review
Why: The Documents main gained an unrelated merge-queue report before PR submission, so the feature branch must include the current authoritative base.
Evidence: Comparing c256558 and fdca353 shows only the merge-queue report changed; the DHF plan, index and asset inventory retain their bytes. Dev combination tests follow on this exact pin.
Impact: Update the Documents gitlink and stage-seven trace; no DHF package, publication or runtime data change.
Refs: .task/feature-dhf-template-pipeline-plan.md
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=4f84c2e1630cd0311643529fae1c3a99f1dd5d64.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: The approved 44-template scope and implementation decisions need a durable parent record and a mechanical source check.
Evidence: W0 focused tests, current Documents pin, full make test and make build passed locally; prior port-conflict failures remain in the task card.
Impact: Records stage decisions, W0 code evidence, and the Documents gitlink without claiming stage-six acceptance or component delivery.
Refs: feature/rdm-two-trees-latest-templates
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=d852c159b6b3387a2f418a42ab6d3696ac873d01.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: The Dev U7 task must consume the actual reviewed Backend merge and record the current agent-only delivery authorization.
Evidence: Backend #185 merged as 8e80e261 after independent REPLAY and exact-head GATE run 3062; task card preserves the original SELF resume receipt.
Impact: Advance the Backend gitlink to the merged component; parent combination and CI remain pending final synchronization.
Refs: Dev #486; Backend #185; Dev queue #518
Why: Keep the Dev project entry and task record aligned with the approved DHF implementation and saved U1 evidence.
Evidence: SELF make test passed on the Dev combination with Documents c256558; the complete output is in the task card.
Impact: Advances only the Documents pin and progress metadata; no template publication, migration, or deployment.
Refs: DHF r0.1 U1, feature/dhf-template-pipeline-plan
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=f00165e8d71e4dc8ba0ceb7dc50c1a8a3deb6d60.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Prepare genuine Dev #488 for its final window using actually merged component versions and the authorized agent merge scope.
Evidence: Frontend PR 73 tree-identical merge and independent review; RDM PR 301 GATE3044, independent replay, Root merge ef510. Full Dev combination and exact-head CI remain pending.
Impact: Advances the frontend pin and task record only; current target main sync follows in the scheduled final window.
Refs: Dev PR #488; Frontend PR #73; RDM PR #301; Issue #518
Why: Resume the approved DHF work from saved planning artifacts and a clean task tree.
Evidence: Startup failure and combination-check receipts are retained in the task card.
Impact: Planning entry, task authorization and Documents composition only.
Refs: feature/dhf-template-pipeline-plan; DHF plan r0.1
Why: restore the assigned task against the current target while retaining its original baseline and all newer component capabilities.
Evidence: startup precheck and real parent/component sync receipts capture the original conflict; Documents PR89 was independently reviewed, merged by the agent, and its tree verified.
Impact: include origin/main and the delivered documentation merge 7bd4e17827d4c7c88647bf3c9199c495b60cb107 without rewriting task history or pushing waiting branches.
Refs: Dev PR #489; Documents PR #89; merge queue Issue #518; user takeover authorization on 2026-10-14
Why: Carry the actual merged contract and approved permission implementation boundary into the integration composition.
Evidence: Documents PR 99 merged as a7ff466d9ae91fc67a53d2bf4991f47fc63a2a4c after independent review and verified source digest; RDM PR 360 preserves actual-actor projection semantics.
Impact: Update documentation pin, navigation and delivery records only; new composition tests and final-head CI remain required.
Refs: IAM I1 permission contract section 8; Documents PRs 98 and 99; RDM PR 360.
Why: Record user acceptance and use the actual merged permission contract in the integration composition.
Evidence: Documents PR 98 merged as 3cf263962bd106529ee0531c8415cb16eecedfe3; independent document review and full SELF receipts retained in the task record.
Impact: Advance only Documents and delivery evidence; full IAM later increments and deployment remain outside scope.
Refs: Documents PR 98; IAM I1 U1-U2; policy/delivery.md stages 8-9.
Why: Keep the user-approved implementation and pending acceptance separate in the fixed integration records.
Evidence: Current Dev make test passed at10789653 and RDM combined checks passed at70e27b08; final text-only combination is verified next.
Impact: Documents and card records only; no permission source, pins in RDM, existing services or production data changes.
Refs: I1 stage 7 acceptance candidate
Why: Preserve the human stage 6 approval separately from the synchronized formal test candidate.
Evidence: Original reviewed objects and the user approval are recorded; startup recovery and synchronization outputs are captured as complete SELF receipts.
Impact: Advance approval records only, retain all upstream membership records and enter planned I1 API/command verification. No production operations or later increments started.
Refs: User approval; policy/delivery.md stage 6 to 7
Why: The resumed task requires a fresh baseline before recording the approved implementation and formal checks.
Evidence: Startup identified SYNC_REQUIRED; Documents pointer conflict was resolved by merging the referenced upstream commit while preserving all three approved I1 documents byte-for-byte.
Impact: Workspace recovery only; retain incoming project-membership records and the fixed I1 approval objects. Formal checks remain pending.
Refs: User approval of I1 implementation; policy/governance.md startup and recovery
Why: The final base combination must reference actual reviewed main commits.
Evidence: Component PRs are merged, and each merged tree matches the independently tested candidate; whole review receipts remain unmodified.
Impact: Advance gitlinks and preserve acceptance evidence; new exact-head CI follows with no runtime changes.
Refs: Backend195 Frontend82 Documents97; feature/project-member-access
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=946cc13c9a10a2023a766b211e1148e625b62943.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Existing upload history must stay private after project adoption, and final object evidence must remain traceable.
Evidence: Original tool receipts and independent reports saved byte-for-byte; new fixed combination and CI remain pending.
Impact: Select Backend d26f3cf and proposal r1.1 with unchanged public downstream contracts; preserve workspaces and live data.
Refs: feature/project-member-access; Frontend PR82; Documents PR97
Why: Keep the reviewable contract and observed verification together in the fixed parent composition.
Evidence: Dev make test passed on 0ab70b0c and RDM make test passed on ef075bd1, recorded as complete SELF receipts. Final parent pin verification follows this metadata checkpoint.
Impact: Advance the text-only review record and save evidence; no implementation components changed.
Refs: IAM I1 U1-U2 local review
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=143e6367367760deceac91ac3de5ccb3ed6adebc.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Keep the accepted IAM direction and I1 review entry visible from the authoritative integration checkout.
Evidence: Full SELF document consistency receipts are recorded in the I1 task card. Final synchronized parent combination verification follows this checkpoint.
Impact: Advance Documents only and record I1 local authorization; backend, frontend and UI behavior pins remain unchanged.
Refs: Approved IAM plan r1; I1 U1-U2
Why: Final review and real composition exposed member upload rejection, private project cards and stale duty selection.
Evidence: Component correction receipts and fixed clean source SHAs; independent replays and final composition are in progress.
Impact: Select Backend d2f96e7 and Frontend 2ba275b with current UI, preserving private originals and verified project commands.
Refs: feature/project-member-access
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=86d975b822c2384e96edd75f9c3a2dca63593b3a.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Host-only project creation and domain membership must form one verified identity.
Evidence: Tool-imported SELF receipts and independent Backend and Frontend replay attestations; composed acceptance and final CI remain in progress.
Impact: Advance fixed component pins and record the authorized implementation and privacy boundaries without deployment or runtime changes.
Refs: .task/feature-project-member-access.md; system-project-membership proposal r1
weichen
