Why: Incorporate the accepted proposal-status and merge-queue policy updates before U3 review.
Evidence: The Documents branch merged origin/main without overlapping content; Dev has no remaining unmerged paths. Strict pins and full combination will be revalidated at this head.
Impact: Documents gitlink and unrelated mainline task/policy files; U3 runtime components unchanged.
Refs: U3 r0.4 Task 6 review synchronization
Why: Fix the exact Agent-Native consumer chain and publish the r0.4 Backend and browser test candidate as a reviewable Dev combination.
Evidence: Strict pin preflight, component tests, isolated PostgreSQL, six HTTP/Playwright cases, and make build passed. The full local make test was interrupted by an unrelated concurrent fixed-port collision; this failure and prior pin failures remain in the task card. Exact-HEAD CI and independent review remain pending.
Impact: Dev gitlinks and task evidence only; no paid model call or deployment.
Refs: U3 r0.4 implementation plan; Agent-Native PR #46; Agent-Squad PR #53; Backend PR #193; Frontend PR #79
Why: retain the approved status changes and current documentation while adopting the already approved manual delivery window after real platform validation.
Evidence: original startup, conflict resolution, combination test and writer inventory receipts are preserved in the task card; independent Doc89 and platform replay reports are referenced. Final candidate CI and review remain required.
Impact: publish the delivered Documents merge, manual trial policy and truthful capability state; keep all workflow triggers/checks and original task baseline unchanged.
Refs: Dev PR #489; Documents PR #89; Issue #518; approved merge queue implementation plan r1; user continuation authorization on 2026-10-14
Why: preserve the approved design decision and a staged, verifiable plan before code work.
Evidence: six tasks and thirty steps self-reviewed; local links pass; make test passed with Documents 276f885 staged, receipt imported as SELF.
Impact: documentation, task card and Documents gitlink only; no model calls or production behavior changes.
Refs: modules/documents/docs/proposals/2026-10-14-fast-slow-u3-r04-reliable-first-checkpoint-implementation-plan.md; .task/feature-fast-slow-u2-u3-plan.md
Why: preserve the failed A01 outcome and an actionable design for reliable staged material work.
Evidence: Documents links and diff checks pass; Dev make test passed with the staged Documents gitlink; original A01 and offline diagnostic receipts remain SELF.
Impact: documentation, task-card evidence and Documents pin only; no product behavior or model budget change.
Refs: modules/documents/docs/proposals/2026-10-14-fast-slow-u3-r04-reliable-first-checkpoint-design.md; .task/feature-fast-slow-u2-u3-plan.md
Why: allow the registered task worktree to pass the current resume validator.
Evidence: precheck READY at 3de8793; registered path, branch, and R0 were verified against Git.
Impact: task-card metadata only; no product code or component pointer changes.
Refs: .task/feature-fast-slow-u2-u3-plan.md
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=add097d06137c4912a4ed9279e98ca353e4e4cf1.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: restore the assigned task against the current target while retaining its original baseline and all newer component capabilities.
Evidence: startup precheck and real parent/component sync receipts capture the original conflict; Documents PR89 was independently reviewed, merged by the agent, and its tree verified.
Impact: include origin/main and the delivered documentation merge 7bd4e17827d4c7c88647bf3c9199c495b60cb107 without rewriting task history or pushing waiting branches.
Refs: Dev PR #489; Documents PR #89; merge queue Issue #518; user takeover authorization on 2026-10-14
Why: The approved implementation and mechanism validation are complete, while the real-model quality gate remains unrun.
Evidence: Dev ef6f650 make test/build exit 0 with imported SELF receipt; Backend 5f53f80 independent code replay and v10 PostgreSQL/HTTP receipts are linked in the card.
Impact: Update task/project status for human stage-6 review; no provider request, merge or deployment.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Documents PR #95
Why: The one-shot trial candidate must be tied to the current authoritative main before its exact combination and CI gates.
Evidence: make task-sync exit 0, sync_base 57bcb17, changed 0; complete SELF receipt imported by make evidence.
Impact: Task record only; no paid trial authorization or provider call.
Refs: Dev PR #512; r0.3 plan Task 5
Why: The separately gated A01 trial needs a unique label and raw result file while preserving the consumed r0.2 sample.
Evidence: Backend 5f83454 label/output tests and prior Dev 6f91ca9 combination receipt are recorded with their exact SHAs; new exact-head validation follows.
Impact: Zero-paid evaluator code and report pin only; no provider request, merge or deployment.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend #193; Documents #95
Why: The latest authoritative main must be included before fixing the final validation object.
Evidence: make task-sync exit 0 at sync_base 57bcb17, complete SELF receipt imported by make evidence; component gitlinks did not change.
Impact: Task record only; exact-head Dev combination and platform checks remain pending.
Refs: Dev PR #512; r0.3 plan Task 4
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=57bcb17ea212a531186b6e21617a7f3bea65a791.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: The final zero-paid candidate has independent code review and task-owned database/browser results at fixed SHAs.
Evidence: Imported PostgreSQL and HTTP Playwright SELF receipts; reviewer independently replayed Backend 5f53f80 and found no remaining Critical/Important.
Impact: Pin Documents b776fe1 and record code mechanism PASS separately from model quality NOT_RUN; no paid call or merge.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Documents PR #95
Why: Independent review found an unproven approval statement hidden before a caution word.
Evidence: The new counterexample failed before Backend 5f53f80; earlier PostgreSQL receipt and review findings remain tied to their original SHAs.
Impact: Advance the zero-paid v10 material candidate; full exact-head validation and independent re-review remain pending.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend PR #193; r0.3 review findings
Why: Independent re-review found an unchecked extra direct source and an unfamiliar-unit count revision.
Evidence: Both counterexamples failed before Backend badf80d and passed after; prior PostgreSQL receipt belongs to 3f0141d and is preserved separately.
Impact: Advance the zero-paid Backend candidate; repeat database, browser and exact-head combination validation on this SHA.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend PR #193; r0.3 review findings
Why: The third independent review found incomplete sentence, revised count and same-source scope shortcuts.
Evidence: New counterexamples failed before Backend 3f0141d and passed after; exact prior review failures and mechanisms remain recorded in Documents 53b1abd.
Impact: Advance Backend and Documents draft pins; paid model quality remains NOT_RUN.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend PR #193; Documents PR #95
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=57bcb17ea212a531186b6e21617a7f3bea65a791.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: branches merged into main had left their task cards open; backfill status and archive to prevent bookkeeping debt.
Evidence: feature-merge-queue-policy-draft.md(PR#519) — merges verified via git log --merges against origin/main.
Impact: .task/*.md moved to .task/archive/ with status backfilled; no code or submodule change.
Refs: task.sh close (card-autoclose-r1)
Why: Independent review found three unsupported-claim paths in the prior candidate.
Evidence: Each source-context, scope and unstructured-placement counterexample failed before repair; Backend full Go and selected fake-stream tests passed after.
Impact: Advance Backend 9019f90 and preserve the failed review plus exact prior combination receipt; revalidation follows on the new SHA.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend PR #193; r0.3 review P1 findings
Why: The user requires all merges to follow agent-run synchronization, review, current-head CI and platform admission.
Evidence: Existing delivery stages and owner-only protection boundary reviewed; exact current Gitea Chinese labels verified from runtime resources.
Impact: Strengthen the merge executor rule only; retain human stage reviews, owner protection actions and actual CI requirements.
Refs: User instruction; merge-queue implementation plan U4/U5; Dev PR #519; Issue #518
Why: The approved candidate must record the latest authoritative main before independent review.
Evidence: make task-sync exit 0 with sync_base 415f9ac; full SELF receipt imported by make evidence.
Impact: Task evidence only; source components unchanged and current-head combination remains to be run.
Refs: Dev PR #512; r0.3 evidence implementation plan Task 4
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=415f9ac58ece9d9b63bd9b3fea39978bb847fcce.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: The review candidate needs fixed browser results and a durable validation report.
Evidence: Tool-imported two-pass real HTTP fake-stream Playwright receipt on Dev b10a218; owned mechanism and preview processes were stopped.
Impact: Pin Documents 21fbc9d and record mechanism PASS separately from still-unrun real-model quality.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Documents PR #95
Why: The real HTTP gate now checks the host-generated pending relationship alongside source recovery and reading focus.
Evidence: Fixed Dev combination on f7e55c3 passed with imported SELF receipt; the new browser assertion failed on the old fixture, then Backend selected fake-stream tests passed.
Impact: Update test-only Backend/Frontend components and preserve the first browser RED; new exact-head browser and combination gates follow.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend #193; Frontend #79
Why: Close the delivered I1 task without modifying unrelated task records or shared workspaces.
Evidence: Dev PR 534 merged after all three exact-head CI jobs passed; RDM 360/362 and Documents 98/99 actual results and independent reviews are retained.
Impact: Archive this task card and preserve original receipts only; leave all worktrees, branches, production services and later IAM increments unchanged.
Refs: Dev PR 534; policy/delivery.md task closure authorization; IAM I1.
Why: The first exact Dev r0.3 combination failed the Frontend unused-export ratchet despite passing runtime tests.
Evidence: The failed SELF receipt is imported into the task card; regenerated Frontend knip 51 <= 52, UI knip 61 <= 61 and component build/typechecks pass.
Impact: Pin Core, Backend, Frontend and UI corrections without changing the evidence wire shape; full Dev combination follows on this HEAD.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Core #31; Backend #193; Frontend #79; UI #51
Why: The zero-paid candidate needs an auditable source, database and prompt-size record before exact-head combination testing.
Evidence: Tool-imported isolated PostgreSQL and offline size receipts; Component tests are identified as local SELF in the task card.
Impact: Evidence and state text only; paid A01 remains NOT_RUN.
Refs: Dev PR #512; r0.3 evidence implementation plan Task 4
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=e793e9804a1f5ecf49b29a40b4baac90ceb04e55.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Preserve independent final review and current-source equivalence before platform admission.
Evidence: Final document and integration metadata review has zero findings; full composition test and source equivalence receipts are retained with precise SELF object boundaries.
Impact: Delivery evidence only; no production, provider, guideline or document changes from the reviewed candidate.
Refs: IAM I1 integration task; Documents 98/99; RDM 360/362.
Why: The approved r0.3 candidate now has Core evidence types, Backend normalization and matching generated frontend/UI contracts.
Evidence: Core and Backend full Go suites, selected live-tag fake-provider tests, UI 165 tests/typecheck, Frontend 265 tests/build and recursive worktree verification passed locally; final Dev combination follows on this exact commit.
Impact: Advance the five component gitlinks in the existing draft; no paid model call, merge or deployment.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Core #31; Backend #193; Frontend #79; UI #51; Documents #95
Why: Preserve actual component merge results and current delivery authorization before integration CI.
Evidence: RDM PR 360 merged at exact successful CI head; new Dev make test passed and independent metadata checks preserved approved digests and pins.
Impact: Clarify historical task records and current approved repair scope; preserve documentation and delivery evidence only.
Refs: Documents PRs 98 and 99; RDM PRs 360 and 362; IAM I1 task record.
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=1e5c6b9c10ba77ed34663fd670138621a17342bd.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Carry the actual merged contract and approved permission implementation boundary into the integration composition.
Evidence: Documents PR 99 merged as a7ff466d9ae91fc67a53d2bf4991f47fc63a2a4c after independent review and verified source digest; RDM PR 360 preserves actual-actor projection semantics.
Impact: Update documentation pin, navigation and delivery records only; new composition tests and final-head CI remain required.
Refs: IAM I1 permission contract section 8; Documents PRs 98 and 99; RDM PR 360.
Why: the user confirmed acceptance in conversation on 2026-10-13; the archived
card should carry the verdict with an honest source label.
Evidence: user confirmation (conversation reply); automated ten-scenario replay
25/25 PASS rows on this card and PR #529.
Impact: archived task card note only.
Refs: task feature/rdm-increment-settings-duties (archived via #532).
Why: The user approved zero-paid implementation after the written plan review, and the first main sync required component conflict resolution.
Evidence: Tool-imported first-sync failure and resolved-sync SELF receipts; Backend full Go and Frontend test/build results are recorded as local checks.
Impact: Pin Documents approval status and preserve the exact merge/sync trail; paid A01 remains unauthorized.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Documents PR #95
weichen