Why: The independent review flagged stale pre-close header lines (PR, stage, to-do) on the archived card.
Evidence: Review approved both PRs with two Important stale-text findings; Documents stage table fixed in 6973a99.
Impact: Task card only; the preceding transport commit pins modules/documents to 6973a99.
Refs: Dev #630, Documents #116
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: close the task card inside its own PR so landing it needs no post-merge backfill or separate close PR.
Evidence: .task/feature-rdm-two-trees-latest-templates.md -> .task/archive/feature-rdm-two-trees-latest-templates.md; status 已完成（合入前闭合）; PR #630https://git-home.u1680832.nyat.app:30319/weichen/Agent-System-Dev/pulls/630.
Impact: task metadata only; the card is archived within PR #630 and lands with its merge commit.
Refs: task.sh close --self
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=73bc9f208103ec1b9b83775ca65fee12f79ba99e.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Resuming the task worktree requires a READY precheck before further writes.
Evidence: make precheck READY receipt imported by make task-resume (SELF).
Impact: Task card only.
Refs: feature/rdm-two-trees-latest-templates
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: The user chose to close the two-trees initiative partially, archiving delivered work and registering the rest as follow-up.
Evidence: Delivered SHAs verified with git merge-base against each component main; Documents and Dev synced with main via agent-exec transports.
Impact: Task card only; W0 guard and test port fixes stay in branch history and are not merged.
Refs: feature/rdm-two-trees-latest-templates
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: The user decided the company default visual values and the 44-template publication method.
Evidence: User answer in this session (2026-10-16).
Impact: Task card only.
Refs: modules/documents/docs/records/2026-10-15-unified-document-renderer/09-implementation-plan.md Tasks 7, 8, 13
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=e8d3e61a38e9690763ef46f272b2643604629cc4.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Task 10 must start from the Backend line that combines current main with trusted project context, audit, work observation and human decision behavior.
Evidence: Backend d9d8f016 passes focused extension/app, full vet/test/build and static binary checks; its parent merge 92f9286 also passed isolated PostgreSQL migration-history tests.
Impact: Advances only the Backend gitlink before the shared renderer path is implemented.
Refs: Unified document renderer Task 10 preparation
Why: Resume the long-running two-tree and renderer task on the current Dev baseline without dropping project context, audit, human-decision, layered-environment, plugin or service changes.
Evidence: Backend merge 92f9286 preserves both lines and passes full vet/test/build plus isolated PostgreSQL migration tests; Documents merge c313639 is conflict-free; tests.test_svc passes 23 cases.
Impact: Resolves Backend/Documents gitlinks and the svc fixture, adopts current Core/Frontend/UI pins, and leaves Task 10 implementation separate.
Refs: task-sync for feature/rdm-two-trees-latest-templates
Why: The approved RDM renderer integration now has a reproducible dependency, CLI implementation, independent review, one corrective pass and exact evidence that need a parent review pointer.
Evidence: Documents 6b3031a records RDM 019d60d4, Renderer 732e7e7, focused race/vet/full build and disposable PostgreSQL validation.
Impact: Advances only the Documents gitlink and task record. Profiles, real databases, Task 10, RDM delivery, deployment and release remain gated.
Refs: Unified document renderer Task 9
Why: The approved safe-base remediation was implemented by CLI, independently reviewed, corrected once, and needs a parent record tied to exact component and evidence objects.
Evidence: Documents bd1d6b8 records RDM 48120ed, Renderer 732e7e7, the 44/44 compatibility receipt, review findings, and remaining human visual gates.
Impact: Advances only the Documents gitlink and task record; it does not publish profiles, migrate data, start Task 9, push, merge, or deploy.
Refs: Unified document renderer Tasks 7-8
Why: The batch review now ties PostgreSQL and product-matrix evidence to their exact tested RDM commit.
Evidence: Documents bbae238 has SHA256 73c9865001538e8b40f0c600a32ec35383e48b10ace1825e3e596c66624f9fc7 for the corrected report.
Impact: Updates only the Documents gitlink and task-record digest.
Refs: Unified document renderer Tasks 7-8
Why: The approved renderer batch needs a parent-repository review pointer that preserves the exact local Renderer and RDM objects and their remaining human gates.
Evidence: Documents 870aa17 records Renderer 732e7e7 and RDM ec24a42, the independent review, 44/44 compilation, and 41-pass/3-blocked base-package preflight.
Impact: Advances only the Documents gitlink and task record. It does not add a Renderer remote/gitlink, migrate a real database, publish profiles, start Task 9, or deploy.
Refs: Unified document renderer Tasks 7-8
Why: Attach the fixed Task 4-6 review object and exact renderer candidate to the active two-trees task.
Evidence: SELF record SHA256 deb81626f239f4c05872dbcb5a164b60ee6bf9b38b22564112c10d2e6c0e4982 binds renderer 0efa07f8ce5cb4e1ff93886cf6769d111cba9872.
Impact: Updates the Documents gitlink and task record only; no runtime integration, migration, deployment, push, or publication.
Refs: unified-document-renderer Tasks 4-6
Why: Point the active task to the concrete profile snapshot contract and its updated review record.
Evidence: SELF report hash c7b02fa1aedbe0c0c9d95437927820a65ccf62344f377603c7df2e3d18efdfc1 binds renderer a08ae7ac81d4c648b350d890da97c91e64950769.
Impact: Updates the Documents gitlink and task record only.
Refs: unified-document-renderer Tasks 1-3
Why: Attach the fixed first-batch implementation review and exact component candidates to the active two-trees task.
Evidence: SELF report links and hashes resolve to Documents fb1872613277f59a057cfb6f03b1fcf246e42743, RDM c188df36fbb77671048d6a40607bd14bf21c23a4, and renderer 7c089a91f8ce8869ea4334e1d4ed15f07c61a5bb.
Impact: Updates the Documents gitlink and task record only; no runtime integration, migration, deployment, push, or publication.
Refs: unified-document-renderer Tasks 1-3
Why: Make the renderer architecture, implementation plan, design rules, workflows, and acceptance matrix reviewable from the active two-trees task.
Evidence: SELF checks validated all relative links, code fences, JSON syntax, manifest hashes, and staged whitespace at Documents 647da985774983fb12dadf2073f68efb9046151f.
Impact: Updates only the Documents gitlink and active task-card reference; no product code, migration, deployment, or published rules change.
Refs: feature/rdm-two-trees-latest-templates
Why: Formal project writes must bind the exact actor, conversation, project, command, payload, and source watermark.
Evidence: Backend 14e780c passes focused command-bus, app, server, and squad-adapter suites.
Impact: The Dev combination matches the final local RDM product gate.
Refs: TT-N03 TT-R01
Why: Review found stale-source, direct-command, native-tool, and clarification-watermark bypasses in the earlier Backend pin.
Evidence: Backend 5ccbe8f passes the full Go test and build suites after closing those paths.
Impact: The Dev combination records the fail-closed project work and W4b host contract for later exact-head replay.
Refs: TT-N03 TT-R01 W4b
Why: The combination result and the planning status need to live with the same task, without treating local verification as a merge.
Evidence: SELF receipt edb81a90 records make test && make build at exit 0. Documents af5093d records what remains NOT_RUN.
Impact: Reviewers can see the implemented chain, the local evidence, and that sync, CI, and deployment have not happened.
Refs: W4b human confirmation design r1
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: The delivery precheck is behind main, so this implementation continued only in the recorded local mode.
Evidence: The imported receipt is the local precheck output already stored by task-resume.
Impact: This does not mark the branch ready to merge.
Refs: W4b human confirmation design r1
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: Structure confirmation needs the fixed backend component, and that component's project-context imports have to be visible in the architecture baseline.
Evidence: SELF make test && make build exited 0 with backend a4d6404. The first pin attempt failed the architecture ratchet and the store compatibility count; both are fixed in this pin.
Impact: Dev now builds against the human decision schema. Delivery sync, CI, and deployment are still outstanding.
Refs: W4b human confirmation design r1
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: Dynamic structure confirmation needs a trusted one-time human proof before RDM may apply a proposal.
Evidence: Design SHA256 66c1bb8a1f7c1d0be3a1fe1181541b3e490c52a8a5601c3eb6410cabe2442b10; make test SELF receipt 0f96e34821b1f88ca6c8e849e28f73bc19991f13ad563940ec8e6bb2a71b9851.
Impact: Save the review candidate and exact Documents pin; W4b writes remain blocked pending the required design review while W3 continues.
Refs: TT-D02, TT-D03; W4b human confirmation design adjustment r1
Why: The documentation task must be current with authoritative main before recording the W4b design adjustment.
Evidence: make task-sync SELF receipt b41451822345b3b227d2c7af3e1533eb007106319162b69bee65f7de8075c821; merged origin/main 99119a7338 and verified recursive pins.
Impact: Preserve latest work-companion and component pins; previous combination tests remain historical and require rerun for this head.
Refs: TT-D02, TT-R01; stage-six W4b design gap
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=99119a733830bc120cd6747b8b61736ea6da6078.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: The Documents stage-five approval record and current gitlink need an exact local combination receipt.
Evidence: make test && make build SELF receipt 6ffae158b67163ca23ccb09146c58f1f3aba1c4cfa3200752cf99cc854d12856 on 30a71afa1a.
Impact: Save the complete tool-written test and build output in the task card; this is local evidence, not CI or stage-six acceptance.
Refs: TT-N03, TT-R01; Documents 10508d1
Why: The goal now includes two approved work-source and risk requirements with a reviewed stage-five implementation path.
Evidence: Stage-four approval call_a6853c4232f34285a6cbae19dfbeeec5; stage-five approval call_497a8a4c28bd4231a2cfd63d84375f2a; document checker SELF receipt f4a4cdde2d3ad9b250742da764455a1304e1e26f07270da4f0d37ad6ed8b6c7e.
Impact: Pin the Documents record and task-card authorization; product capability remains subject to implementation and tests.
Refs: TT-N03, TT-R01; Documents 10508d1
Why: Keep the exact failed-sync receipt and the safe component reconciliation before retrying task synchronization.
Evidence: The Documents merge preserved both histories; materialization completed at Backend e6c3d0d87608f3053c89151e8d0cf3fa3f8788f1 and recursive check-worktree verify passed.
Impact: Task card only; no product change or stage-four acceptance claim.
Refs: stage 4 work-observation review; task-sync
Why: The authoritative target advanced while this task recorded approved source and risk requirements.
Evidence: Documents HEAD merges both the task branch and incoming 46506aec34a8803d1b7f4de1a048de9dba591da2 pin; the staged superproject diff has no whitespace errors.
Impact: Include upstream task cards, Backend pin, governance changes, and this task Documents branch without rewriting approved records.
Refs: task-sync; stage 4 work observation review
Why: Save the approved scope expansion, reviewable X3 design, and local combination evidence before synchronizing the authoritative target.
Evidence: Stage-three amendment was approved by the user; fixed stage-four document hash c9edb25c1decbbcb31220ef0cec8703c37e4aaa87bee31eb308169000b335d8c passed link/hash checks and the Documents combination passed make test with SELF receipt 77c20093727a7748f807fb7c22d523e416ca649b98fa839ec48ecd47290223c3.
Impact: Task record and Documents pointer only; X3 public API and product behavior remain unimplemented pending manual stage-four and five review.
Refs: TT-N03, TT-R01; stage 4 addendum
Why: Preserve the successful synchronized combination and fixed-object review records without changing product code.
Evidence: Current-main task-sync and make test plus make build exited zero; original local and reviewer receipts are retained with their source labels.
Impact: Task record only; P2 review does not stand in for time repair, increment acceptance, CI, or deployment.
Refs: stage 6; verified code object 0db52ed5da
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=11aa76a3bc1c5047791f9a2de154e451634b6567.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Save the reviewed stage 6 boundaries, component probes, dependency state, and service fixture evidence before current-main synchronization.
Evidence: Complete working-combination make test exited zero after isolated-port fixture repair; earlier failures and original SELF receipts remain recorded in the task card.
Impact: Local checkpoint only; no product acceptance, PR, release, deployment, or real database migration.
Refs: stage 6 W4a, W6, W9; approved time-contract SHA256 d78849440e6346482fc09925d402790a7ad257ef76c85275610046a845a45f37
Why: Concurrent task worktrees reuse fixed ports and can enter an unrelated port-occupied path instead of the intended service assertion.
Evidence: An owned listener on port 18803 reproduced the existing failure; focused, parallel, and deployment fixture checks passed with the original assertions retained.
Impact: Test fixtures only; use per-instance dynamic ports and preserve restart and stolen-port checks. Full combination validation follows.
Refs: stage 6 local verification; /tmp/rdm-svc-port-isolation-report-20261014.md
Why: The approved 44-template scope and implementation decisions need a durable parent record and a mechanical source check.
Evidence: W0 focused tests, current Documents pin, full make test and make build passed locally; prior port-conflict failures remain in the task card.
Impact: Records stage decisions, W0 code evidence, and the Documents gitlink without claiming stage-six acceptance or component delivery.
Refs: feature/rdm-two-trees-latest-templates
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=f00165e8d71e4dc8ba0ceb7dc50c1a8a3deb6d60.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: establish the authorized task workspace and its initial baseline.
Evidence: preserved precheck receipt in .task/feature-rdm-two-trees-latest-templates.md; R0=add097d06137c4912a4ed9279e98ca353e4e4cf1.
Impact: task metadata only; the feature workspace starts at add097d061.
Refs: .task/feature-rdm-two-trees-latest-templates.md
weichenandCursor