Why: The reviewable plan needs a fixed Dev combination and complete tool-written verification receipt.
Evidence: make test && make build exit 0 on Dev 73bb827; SELF receipt 02567630b483ace3feaa12e227d50de63205d76fe76e6ac266085dbda50b7535 imported by make evidence.
Impact: Task evidence only; r0.3 semantic implementation and paid quality remain NOT_RUN.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Documents PR #95
Why: The r0.2 real-model sample failed semantic quality, and the user approved the r0.3 written design for detailed planning.
Evidence: Prior r0.2 A01 report and imported SELF receipts remain in the task card; plan self-review and git diff --cached --check passed.
Impact: Pin Documents f608ae5 and update planning state; implementation and paid model trials remain gated.
Refs: Documents PR #95; Dev PR #512
Why: The failed A01 needs a documented next design while the six PRs remain draft and unmerged.
Evidence: Independent semantic FAIL and the committed r0.3 spec with resolved links and explicit no-paid/no-implementation boundary.
Impact: Project entry and task card point to a pending design review; no new semantic behavior is enabled.
Refs: U3 r0.2 A01 assessment, r0.3 design
Why: The first rerun stopped at the dirty-worktree guard while the serial rerun completed both test and build.
Evidence: make evidence imported exit-0 receipt 3ea47713 at Dev f8c7650; original exit-2 receipt remains.
Impact: The failed model quality decision is unchanged and current-head GATE remains pending.
Refs: U3 r0.2 A01 assessment
Why: An in-flight Documents edit correctly blocked build after the first post-sample test phase.
Evidence: Full exit-2 SELF receipt imported by make evidence; Documents report committed at 4971d0d with archive hashes.
Impact: The candidate now has a clean composition for a serial full rerun; model-quality FAIL is unchanged.
Refs: U3 r0.2 A01 assessment
Why: The authorized r0.2 trial had an unsupported stage inference, while replay exposed two separate diagnostic-control defects.
Evidence: Exact paid-run files and tool-imported receipts, independent REPLAY, and Backend RED-to-GREEN/full-suite checks.
Impact: U3 quality remains FAIL; the new Backend code has no paid-model acceptance and all PRs stay draft.
Refs: U3 quality implementation plan r0.2, Task 6
Why: The distinct one-shot evaluation gate changed the Backend and Dev SHAs.
Evidence: make evidence imported exit-0 make test && make build at 894312f; Backend platform run 2940 passed at d89c72e.
Impact: The candidate remains draft and the paid A01 quality gate remains NOT_RUN.
Refs: U3 quality implementation plan r0.2, Task 6 preparation
Why: A future authorized sample needs its own one-shot label rather than reusing exhausted approvals.
Evidence: Guarded label tests were RED then GREEN; full Backend Go suite passed at d89c72e.
Impact: No paid model request is triggered; the candidate SHA changes and requires fresh exact-head CI.
Refs: U3 quality implementation plan r0.2, Task 6 preparation
Why: The task card still described verification as in progress after the fixed candidate passed local checks.
Evidence: Reviewed composition receipt 7111af35, browser receipt c4a2240e and PostgreSQL receipt 7291fe2b are tool-imported SELF records.
Impact: Reviewers see accurate code readiness without treating local evidence as GATE or model acceptance.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: The final zero-paid composition changed after independent review fixes.
Evidence: make evidence imported exit-0 make test && make build at Dev c4a718f with all component pins fixed.
Impact: The task card carries the exact test receipt; model-quality acceptance remains NOT_RUN.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: The fixed candidate must be checked against current main before review and CI.
Evidence: make evidence imported the exit-0 task-sync receipt against d5428c5.
Impact: No new component conflict was found; the review fixes remain pinned.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: The final zero-paid candidate needs the independent review disposition and fresh replay receipts in one composition.
Evidence: Browser receipt c4a2240e and PostgreSQL receipt 7291fe2b were imported by make evidence; Backend RED-to-GREEN fixes passed.
Impact: The task card and Documents report leave real-model validation NOT_RUN and merge gated.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: Review found three code-level failures in approval phrasing, checkpoint counting and evaluator identity.
Evidence: Each targeted regression was RED then GREEN; Backend full Go, race and live fixture checks passed at 9126dae.
Impact: The Dev composition now includes the corrected Backend while real-model QA remains NOT_RUN.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2, independent final review
Why: Main added RDM acceptance coverage during the review and the task branch must include it.
Evidence: make evidence imported the successful task-sync receipt against d5428c5.
Impact: The merge preserved all U3 component pins and added the new target-branch integration script.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=d5428c5f05fc5f625e6232ab3156b17f13e14d6a.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: The composition changed after the first full-suite run and requires its own receipt.
Evidence: make evidence imported exit-0 make test && make build at Dev 1fa58cb.
Impact: The task card distinguishes the verified HEAD from previous component and browser snapshots.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: Final review requires a current target branch and an exact composition.
Evidence: make evidence imported the full exit-0 task-sync receipt; target remained up to date.
Impact: The task card binds the pre-review sync to the current Dev candidate.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: The reviewed candidate must carry its accurate browser, full-build and database evidence.
Evidence: make evidence imported the exact 8c1fc39 combination and isolated PostgreSQL SELF receipts.
Impact: The report remains explicit that final HEAD checks and real-model quality are pending.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: The task-owned HTTP/browser replay and its diagnosed first failure need to be attached to the reviewable composition.
Evidence: Browser receipt f7cbd331e82a60982716bbd79bb9d54712cac4db0395966fefe08f6f380715e7 imported by make evidence.
Impact: Documents and task card distinguish mechanism PASS from real-model NOT_RUN.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: The browser mechanism exposed an ineffective integer output cap in the isolated evaluation server.
Evidence: Backend live-tag numeric regression RED then GREEN; full Backend Go suite passed at 627b6e4.
Impact: The task records the failed first browser run and pins the fixed Backend fixture for a fresh isolated replay.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: The task branch now includes the latest target and the successful sync must be traceable.
Evidence: make evidence imported the full exit-0 SELF receipt for make task-sync.
Impact: The task card retains both the initial conflict and the resolved synchronization.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=143e6367367760deceac91ac3de5ccb3ed6adebc.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: The first task-sync encountered four real gitlink conflicts after main advanced.
Evidence: The failed SELF receipt was imported through make evidence; merged component tests passed at the recorded SHAs.
Impact: The task card preserves the failure and the subsequent resolution without upgrading model QA.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: The target branch advanced Core, Frontend, UI and Backend pointers during the approved U3 revision.
Evidence: Core go test ./...; Backend go test ./...; UI 165 tests and typecheck; Frontend 224 tests and build passed on the resolved component trees.
Impact: Preserve both the current main settings/account/duties work and the U3 candidate at merged component SHAs.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2, task-sync receipt fast-slow-u2-u3-r02-sync-20261013.json
Why: The approved revision spans Backend, UI and Documents and needs one reviewable Dev composition.
Evidence: Backend go test ./...; UI 158 tests and typecheck; Frontend 84 affected tests; exact component SHAs recorded in the task card.
Impact: The task card keeps real-model QA NOT_RUN and the earlier failed sample separate from this candidate.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: Bind the reviewed component pins and unchanged quality failure to the latest local combination result.
Evidence: Imported SELF make test and make build receipt on Dev 7f667f2; Backend f74f6a0 exact-head CI and independent stop-guard review passed.
Impact: Keep six PRs draft and leave the model acceptance and merge gates closed.
Refs: Agent-System-Dev#512
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=ff3fb4a7ebe432ab21c6b9668abc9823aca2fdd1.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: The approved model sample violated its rejected-quote stop rule and the first guard missed JSON errors across runs.
Evidence: Original 14231-token deviation remains recorded; independent replay passed the read-only event-join guard and fail-closed cases without model calls.
Impact: Advance test-only Backend and evidence pins while keeping U3 quality and merge gates closed.
Refs: Agent-System-Dev#512; Agent-System-Backend#193; Agent-System-Documents#95
Why: Bind the post-sample candidate to a clean local test and build result.
Evidence: Imported SELF receipt for make test and make build on Dev 82e8a48; independent model assessment remains FAIL.
Impact: Keep the current component pins reviewable while draft PRs and merge gates stay closed.
Refs: Agent-System-Dev#512
weichen