Why: The separately gated A01 trial needs a unique label and raw result file while preserving the consumed r0.2 sample.
Evidence: Backend 5f83454 label/output tests and prior Dev 6f91ca9 combination receipt are recorded with their exact SHAs; new exact-head validation follows.
Impact: Zero-paid evaluator code and report pin only; no provider request, merge or deployment.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend #193; Documents #95
Why: The final zero-paid candidate has independent code review and task-owned database/browser results at fixed SHAs.
Evidence: Imported PostgreSQL and HTTP Playwright SELF receipts; reviewer independently replayed Backend 5f53f80 and found no remaining Critical/Important.
Impact: Pin Documents b776fe1 and record code mechanism PASS separately from model quality NOT_RUN; no paid call or merge.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Documents PR #95
Why: Independent review found an unproven approval statement hidden before a caution word.
Evidence: The new counterexample failed before Backend 5f53f80; earlier PostgreSQL receipt and review findings remain tied to their original SHAs.
Impact: Advance the zero-paid v10 material candidate; full exact-head validation and independent re-review remain pending.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend PR #193; r0.3 review findings
Why: Independent re-review found an unchecked extra direct source and an unfamiliar-unit count revision.
Evidence: Both counterexamples failed before Backend badf80d and passed after; prior PostgreSQL receipt belongs to 3f0141d and is preserved separately.
Impact: Advance the zero-paid Backend candidate; repeat database, browser and exact-head combination validation on this SHA.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend PR #193; r0.3 review findings
Why: The third independent review found incomplete sentence, revised count and same-source scope shortcuts.
Evidence: New counterexamples failed before Backend 3f0141d and passed after; exact prior review failures and mechanisms remain recorded in Documents 53b1abd.
Impact: Advance Backend and Documents draft pins; paid model quality remains NOT_RUN.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend PR #193; Documents PR #95
Why: Independent review found three unsupported-claim paths in the prior candidate.
Evidence: Each source-context, scope and unstructured-placement counterexample failed before repair; Backend full Go and selected fake-stream tests passed after.
Impact: Advance Backend 9019f90 and preserve the failed review plus exact prior combination receipt; revalidation follows on the new SHA.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend PR #193; r0.3 review P1 findings
Why: The review candidate needs fixed browser results and a durable validation report.
Evidence: Tool-imported two-pass real HTTP fake-stream Playwright receipt on Dev b10a218; owned mechanism and preview processes were stopped.
Impact: Pin Documents 21fbc9d and record mechanism PASS separately from still-unrun real-model quality.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Documents PR #95
Why: The real HTTP gate now checks the host-generated pending relationship alongside source recovery and reading focus.
Evidence: Fixed Dev combination on f7e55c3 passed with imported SELF receipt; the new browser assertion failed on the old fixture, then Backend selected fake-stream tests passed.
Impact: Update test-only Backend/Frontend components and preserve the first browser RED; new exact-head browser and combination gates follow.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend #193; Frontend #79
Why: The first exact Dev r0.3 combination failed the Frontend unused-export ratchet despite passing runtime tests.
Evidence: The failed SELF receipt is imported into the task card; regenerated Frontend knip 51 <= 52, UI knip 61 <= 61 and component build/typechecks pass.
Impact: Pin Core, Backend, Frontend and UI corrections without changing the evidence wire shape; full Dev combination follows on this HEAD.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Core #31; Backend #193; Frontend #79; UI #51
Why: The approved r0.3 candidate now has Core evidence types, Backend normalization and matching generated frontend/UI contracts.
Evidence: Core and Backend full Go suites, selected live-tag fake-provider tests, UI 165 tests/typecheck, Frontend 265 tests/build and recursive worktree verification passed locally; final Dev combination follows on this exact commit.
Impact: Advance the five component gitlinks in the existing draft; no paid model call, merge or deployment.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Core #31; Backend #193; Frontend #79; UI #51; Documents #95
Why: The user approved zero-paid implementation after the written plan review, and the first main sync required component conflict resolution.
Evidence: Tool-imported first-sync failure and resolved-sync SELF receipts; Backend full Go and Frontend test/build results are recorded as local checks.
Impact: Pin Documents approval status and preserve the exact merge/sync trail; paid A01 remains unauthorized.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Documents PR #95
Why: The approved r0.3 plan must run against the current project member and IAM mainline.
Evidence: First task-sync conflict receipt was imported; Backend full Go tests and Frontend test/build passed after resolving component interactions; git diff --cached --check passed.
Impact: Combine current main with the existing U3 draft, preserving both planning entries and the Backend private project event proof transaction.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend PR #193; Frontend PR #79; Documents PR #95
Why: The r0.2 real-model sample failed semantic quality, and the user approved the r0.3 written design for detailed planning.
Evidence: Prior r0.2 A01 report and imported SELF receipts remain in the task card; plan self-review and git diff --cached --check passed.
Impact: Pin Documents f608ae5 and update planning state; implementation and paid model trials remain gated.
Refs: Documents PR #95; Dev PR #512
Why: The failed A01 needs a documented next design while the six PRs remain draft and unmerged.
Evidence: Independent semantic FAIL and the committed r0.3 spec with resolved links and explicit no-paid/no-implementation boundary.
Impact: Project entry and task card point to a pending design review; no new semantic behavior is enabled.
Refs: U3 r0.2 A01 assessment, r0.3 design
Why: An in-flight Documents edit correctly blocked build after the first post-sample test phase.
Evidence: Full exit-2 SELF receipt imported by make evidence; Documents report committed at 4971d0d with archive hashes.
Impact: The candidate now has a clean composition for a serial full rerun; model-quality FAIL is unchanged.
Refs: U3 r0.2 A01 assessment
Why: The authorized r0.2 trial had an unsupported stage inference, while replay exposed two separate diagnostic-control defects.
Evidence: Exact paid-run files and tool-imported receipts, independent REPLAY, and Backend RED-to-GREEN/full-suite checks.
Impact: U3 quality remains FAIL; the new Backend code has no paid-model acceptance and all PRs stay draft.
Refs: U3 quality implementation plan r0.2, Task 6
Why: The final base combination must reference actual reviewed main commits.
Evidence: Component PRs are merged, and each merged tree matches the independently tested candidate; whole review receipts remain unmodified.
Impact: Advance gitlinks and preserve acceptance evidence; new exact-head CI follows with no runtime changes.
Refs: Backend195 Frontend82 Documents97; feature/project-member-access
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=946cc13c9a10a2023a766b211e1148e625b62943.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Existing upload history must stay private after project adoption, and final object evidence must remain traceable.
Evidence: Original tool receipts and independent reports saved byte-for-byte; new fixed combination and CI remain pending.
Impact: Select Backend d26f3cf and proposal r1.1 with unchanged public downstream contracts; preserve workspaces and live data.
Refs: feature/project-member-access; Frontend PR82; Documents PR97
Why: A future authorized sample needs its own one-shot label rather than reusing exhausted approvals.
Evidence: Guarded label tests were RED then GREEN; full Backend Go suite passed at d89c72e.
Impact: No paid model request is triggered; the candidate SHA changes and requires fresh exact-head CI.
Refs: U3 quality implementation plan r0.2, Task 6 preparation
Why: The final zero-paid candidate needs the independent review disposition and fresh replay receipts in one composition.
Evidence: Browser receipt c4a2240e and PostgreSQL receipt 7291fe2b were imported by make evidence; Backend RED-to-GREEN fixes passed.
Impact: The task card and Documents report leave real-model validation NOT_RUN and merge gated.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: Review found three code-level failures in approval phrasing, checkpoint counting and evaluator identity.
Evidence: Each targeted regression was RED then GREEN; Backend full Go, race and live fixture checks passed at 9126dae.
Impact: The Dev composition now includes the corrected Backend while real-model QA remains NOT_RUN.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2, independent final review
Why: The reviewed candidate must carry its accurate browser, full-build and database evidence.
Evidence: make evidence imported the exact 8c1fc39 combination and isolated PostgreSQL SELF receipts.
Impact: The report remains explicit that final HEAD checks and real-model quality are pending.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: The task-owned HTTP/browser replay and its diagnosed first failure need to be attached to the reviewable composition.
Evidence: Browser receipt f7cbd331e82a60982716bbd79bb9d54712cac4db0395966fefe08f6f380715e7 imported by make evidence.
Impact: Documents and task card distinguish mechanism PASS from real-model NOT_RUN.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: The browser mechanism exposed an ineffective integer output cap in the isolated evaluation server.
Evidence: Backend live-tag numeric regression RED then GREEN; full Backend Go suite passed at 627b6e4.
Impact: The task records the failed first browser run and pins the fixed Backend fixture for a fresh isolated replay.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: Final review and real composition exposed member upload rejection, private project cards and stale duty selection.
Evidence: Component correction receipts and fixed clean source SHAs; independent replays and final composition are in progress.
Impact: Select Backend d2f96e7 and Frontend 2ba275b with current UI, preserving private originals and verified project commands.
Refs: feature/project-member-access
Why: The target branch advanced Core, Frontend, UI and Backend pointers during the approved U3 revision.
Evidence: Core go test ./...; Backend go test ./...; UI 165 tests and typecheck; Frontend 224 tests and build passed on the resolved component trees.
Impact: Preserve both the current main settings/account/duties work and the U3 candidate at merged component SHAs.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2, task-sync receipt fast-slow-u2-u3-r02-sync-20261013.json
Why: The approved revision spans Backend, UI and Documents and needs one reviewable Dev composition.
Evidence: Backend go test ./...; UI 158 tests and typecheck; Frontend 84 affected tests; exact component SHAs recorded in the task card.
Impact: The task card keeps real-model QA NOT_RUN and the earlier failed sample separate from this candidate.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=86d975b822c2384e96edd75f9c3a2dca63593b3a.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Host-only project creation and domain membership must form one verified identity.
Evidence: Tool-imported SELF receipts and independent Backend and Frontend replay attestations; composed acceptance and final CI remain in progress.
Impact: Advance fixed component pins and record the authorized implementation and privacy boundaries without deployment or runtime changes.
Refs: .task/feature-project-member-access.md; system-project-membership proposal r1
Why: The approved model sample violated its rejected-quote stop rule and the first guard missed JSON errors across runs.
Evidence: Original 14231-token deviation remains recorded; independent replay passed the read-only event-join guard and fail-closed cases without model calls.
Impact: Advance test-only Backend and evidence pins while keeping U3 quality and merge gates closed.
Refs: Agent-System-Dev#512; Agent-System-Backend#193; Agent-System-Documents#95
Why: The approved v7 sample had two committed checkpoints but failed semantic and final-result acceptance.
Evidence: Import the original failing SELF receipt, bind independently replayed usage/source findings, and pin the corrected read-only evaluation.
Impact: Keep model quality and merge gates closed while preserving six draft PRs for review.
Refs: Agent-System-Dev#512; Agent-System-Backend#193; Agent-System-Documents#95
Why: Bind the newly approved one-shot model evaluation to an exact reviewed candidate.
Evidence: Follow-up harness tests passed after an expected red failure; full Backend suite passed.
Impact: Record the new bounded authorization and test-only Backend revision; U3 quality remains pending.
Refs: Agent-System-Dev#512; Agent-System-Backend#193
Why: The project entry and task card must reflect current code evidence and the failed model gate.
Evidence: Native SELF receipts and independent review report cover the exact current component combination.
Impact: Save the report and status without merging or deploying the candidate.
Refs: U2/U3 plan r0.1
Why: Preserve authoritative main and both backend histories before draft review.
Evidence: Exact incoming cfb8308 merged without source conflicts; current combination and PG checks follow.
Impact: Keep session/account fixes and U2/U3 task authority in the same candidate; model gate remains failed.
Refs: Dev main aa6364f and U2/U3 task card
Why: Preserve the latest combination evidence and independent failure assessment before draft review.
Evidence: Native SELF receipts capture complete local test/build and current HTTP browser checks; model quality remains FAIL.
Impact: Pin the report and code review without merging or deploying the failed candidate.
Refs: feature-fast-slow-u2-u3-plan
Why: Preserve authoritative settings and session changes with the source-bound work candidate.
Evidence: Merged Backend, Core and live fixture guards passed local and independent checks; extra A01 remained a real FAIL.
Impact: Save a draft-reviewable composition without claiming CI, merge, deployment or model-quality approval.
Refs: U2/U3 task card and validation report
Why: The remaining open items (API-key SSE closure, cross-instance
redeem backoff, U7 atomic bootstrap/create, CLI credential delivery)
landed in Backend #192; Dev pins it and closes the contract leftovers.
Evidence: Backend #192 CI success at head bc1e0a3 (GATE); composite CI
on this PR re-runs the suite incl. test-pg (GATE).
Impact: backend pin cfb8308; contract leftover section now records all
items closed; task card H1-H6 requirement table.
Refs: Backend #192; docs/svc-deploy/2026-10-13-login-recovery-contract.md.
Why: Continue the existing delivery after explicit approval for one extra sample.
Evidence: Startup precheck READY and live output/run-limit fixture checks are recorded by evidence.
Impact: Fixed evaluation candidate, max two paid runs and no automatic retry; preserve all original failed samples.
Refs: User approval 2026-10-13
weichen