Why: The single r0.4 A01 failed both staged-result and fast-feedback quality; the user approved writing a conservative next design.
Evidence: Documents 0d473fe link check and diff check; Dev staged-gitlink make test exit 0 through make evidence in the task card. The prior paid sample and independent assessment remain unchanged.
Impact: Add only design, navigation, and task traceability. Product behavior, paid model allowance, merge, and deployment remain unapproved.
Refs: U3 r0.5 design; Dev PR #512; Documents PR #95
Why: The authorized real-model sample failed without checkpoints or a final result, and failed-child Usage was underreported in the original candidate.
Evidence: Independent A01 assessment 2ac373ed; Backend accounting review d53cc969; SELF combination receipt /tmp/fast-slow-u3-r04-20261014/usage-fix-final-dev-combo.json and Backend GATE run 3079.
Impact: Keep eight draft PRs and the original sample intact; pin Backend 0637547 and Documents c53662a while marking stage 7, merge, and deployment not run.
Refs: U3 r0.4 implementation plan; task feature-fast-slow-u2-u3-plan
Why: Record the separate one-time A01 resource authorization and fix the exact Backend revision with its own guarded label and output name.
Evidence: The selector tests failed before the change and passed afterward. Full Backend vet/Go and selected zero-paid live-tag suites, Dev strict pins and build passed; full new-head CI and preflight are required before any paid call.
Impact: Evaluation-only Backend gitlink and task evidence. No provider request, merge or deployment.
Refs: U3 r0.4 stage-6 conclusion and one-time A01 resource proposal; Backend PR #193
Why: Preserve the accepted U7 account transaction integration and pin the Backend merge that retains U3 checkpoint behavior.
Evidence: Backend merged main without text conflicts; full Go vet/test and zero-paid live-tag evaluation checks passed. Dev combination and current-head CI will be revalidated.
Impact: Mainline U7 docs/task records and Backend gitlink; no U3 public-contract or model-budget change.
Refs: U3 r0.4 resource-preparation sync; Dev main 05b997b
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=d852c159b6b3387a2f418a42ab6d3696ac873d01.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: The Dev U7 task must consume the actual reviewed Backend merge and record the current agent-only delivery authorization.
Evidence: Backend #185 merged as 8e80e261 after independent REPLAY and exact-head GATE run 3062; task card preserves the original SELF resume receipt.
Impact: Advance the Backend gitlink to the merged component; parent combination and CI remain pending final synchronization.
Refs: Dev #486; Backend #185; Dev queue #518
Why: Both supported tool finish reasons must fail closed when no call was collected; the Dev composition pins that exact Agent-Native revision through Agent-Squad and Backend.
Evidence: The function_call regression failed before the fix and passed afterward. Agent-Native, Agent-Squad and Backend full vet/test suites, strict Dev pins, and task-owned PostgreSQL/browser checks passed at their recorded versions. Current Dev HEAD CI and final independent replay remain pending.
Impact: Component gitlinks and task evidence only; no paid model call or deployment.
Refs: U3 r0.4 review Important 2; Agent-Native PR #46; Agent-Squad PR #53; Backend PR #193
Why: Preserve the latest Frontend mainline export controls and the corrected batched-notice browser assertion in the U3 candidate.
Evidence: Frontend 269 unit tests/build and six task-owned HTTP/Playwright scenarios passed after merge; required Dev sync returned changed=0 at d852c15. Earlier failed sync and browser receipts are retained.
Impact: Frontend gitlink and task evidence only; current-head full Dev CI, PostgreSQL replay and review closure remain pending.
Refs: U3 r0.4 Task 6; Frontend PR #79
Why: Incorporate the accepted RDM audit export and its Frontend component while retaining U3 browser coverage.
Evidence: Frontend main merged without textual conflicts, 269 unit tests and build passed. Dev composition, task-owned browser, and current-head CI will be revalidated.
Impact: Frontend gitlink and unrelated mainline RDM export files; no U3 contract change.
Refs: U3 r0.4 Task 6 final review synchronization
Why: Close the independent review blockers and keep Dev, Backend, Agent-Squad and Agent-Native on one exact stream/runtime combination.
Evidence: Review issues reproduced RED then passed; component suites and six HTTP/Playwright cases passed. The staged Dev composition passed make test && make build with 340 governance tests and strict pins; full original receipts are in the task card. Current committed-head CI and review closure remain pending.
Impact: Component gitlinks and task evidence only; no paid A01 or deployment.
Refs: U3 r0.4 Task 6; Agent-Native PR #46; Agent-Squad PR #53; Backend PR #193; Frontend PR #79
Why: Incorporate the accepted proposal-status and merge-queue policy updates before U3 review.
Evidence: The Documents branch merged origin/main without overlapping content; Dev has no remaining unmerged paths. Strict pins and full combination will be revalidated at this head.
Impact: Documents gitlink and unrelated mainline task/policy files; U3 runtime components unchanged.
Refs: U3 r0.4 Task 6 review synchronization
Why: Fix the exact Agent-Native consumer chain and publish the r0.4 Backend and browser test candidate as a reviewable Dev combination.
Evidence: Strict pin preflight, component tests, isolated PostgreSQL, six HTTP/Playwright cases, and make build passed. The full local make test was interrupted by an unrelated concurrent fixed-port collision; this failure and prior pin failures remain in the task card. Exact-HEAD CI and independent review remain pending.
Impact: Dev gitlinks and task evidence only; no paid model call or deployment.
Refs: U3 r0.4 implementation plan; Agent-Native PR #46; Agent-Squad PR #53; Backend PR #193; Frontend PR #79
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=f00165e8d71e4dc8ba0ceb7dc50c1a8a3deb6d60.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Prepare genuine Dev #488 for its final window using actually merged component versions and the authorized agent merge scope.
Evidence: Frontend PR 73 tree-identical merge and independent review; RDM PR 301 GATE3044, independent replay, Root merge ef510. Full Dev combination and exact-head CI remain pending.
Impact: Advances the frontend pin and task record only; current target main sync follows in the scheduled final window.
Refs: Dev PR #488; Frontend PR #73; RDM PR #301; Issue #518
Why: preserve the approved design decision and a staged, verifiable plan before code work.
Evidence: six tasks and thirty steps self-reviewed; local links pass; make test passed with Documents 276f885 staged, receipt imported as SELF.
Impact: documentation, task card and Documents gitlink only; no model calls or production behavior changes.
Refs: modules/documents/docs/proposals/2026-10-14-fast-slow-u3-r04-reliable-first-checkpoint-implementation-plan.md; .task/feature-fast-slow-u2-u3-plan.md
Why: preserve the failed A01 outcome and an actionable design for reliable staged material work.
Evidence: Documents links and diff checks pass; Dev make test passed with the staged Documents gitlink; original A01 and offline diagnostic receipts remain SELF.
Impact: documentation, task-card evidence and Documents pin only; no product behavior or model budget change.
Refs: modules/documents/docs/proposals/2026-10-14-fast-slow-u3-r04-reliable-first-checkpoint-design.md; .task/feature-fast-slow-u2-u3-plan.md
Why: restore the assigned task against the current target while retaining its original baseline and all newer component capabilities.
Evidence: startup precheck and real parent/component sync receipts capture the original conflict; Documents PR89 was independently reviewed, merged by the agent, and its tree verified.
Impact: include origin/main and the delivered documentation merge 7bd4e17827d4c7c88647bf3c9199c495b60cb107 without rewriting task history or pushing waiting branches.
Refs: Dev PR #489; Documents PR #89; merge queue Issue #518; user takeover authorization on 2026-10-14
Why: The separately gated A01 trial needs a unique label and raw result file while preserving the consumed r0.2 sample.
Evidence: Backend 5f83454 label/output tests and prior Dev 6f91ca9 combination receipt are recorded with their exact SHAs; new exact-head validation follows.
Impact: Zero-paid evaluator code and report pin only; no provider request, merge or deployment.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend #193; Documents #95
Why: The final zero-paid candidate has independent code review and task-owned database/browser results at fixed SHAs.
Evidence: Imported PostgreSQL and HTTP Playwright SELF receipts; reviewer independently replayed Backend 5f53f80 and found no remaining Critical/Important.
Impact: Pin Documents b776fe1 and record code mechanism PASS separately from model quality NOT_RUN; no paid call or merge.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Documents PR #95
Why: Independent review found an unproven approval statement hidden before a caution word.
Evidence: The new counterexample failed before Backend 5f53f80; earlier PostgreSQL receipt and review findings remain tied to their original SHAs.
Impact: Advance the zero-paid v10 material candidate; full exact-head validation and independent re-review remain pending.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend PR #193; r0.3 review findings
Why: Independent re-review found an unchecked extra direct source and an unfamiliar-unit count revision.
Evidence: Both counterexamples failed before Backend badf80d and passed after; prior PostgreSQL receipt belongs to 3f0141d and is preserved separately.
Impact: Advance the zero-paid Backend candidate; repeat database, browser and exact-head combination validation on this SHA.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend PR #193; r0.3 review findings
Why: The third independent review found incomplete sentence, revised count and same-source scope shortcuts.
Evidence: New counterexamples failed before Backend 3f0141d and passed after; exact prior review failures and mechanisms remain recorded in Documents 53b1abd.
Impact: Advance Backend and Documents draft pins; paid model quality remains NOT_RUN.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend PR #193; Documents PR #95
Why: Independent review found three unsupported-claim paths in the prior candidate.
Evidence: Each source-context, scope and unstructured-placement counterexample failed before repair; Backend full Go and selected fake-stream tests passed after.
Impact: Advance Backend 9019f90 and preserve the failed review plus exact prior combination receipt; revalidation follows on the new SHA.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend PR #193; r0.3 review P1 findings
Why: The review candidate needs fixed browser results and a durable validation report.
Evidence: Tool-imported two-pass real HTTP fake-stream Playwright receipt on Dev b10a218; owned mechanism and preview processes were stopped.
Impact: Pin Documents 21fbc9d and record mechanism PASS separately from still-unrun real-model quality.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Documents PR #95
Why: The real HTTP gate now checks the host-generated pending relationship alongside source recovery and reading focus.
Evidence: Fixed Dev combination on f7e55c3 passed with imported SELF receipt; the new browser assertion failed on the old fixture, then Backend selected fake-stream tests passed.
Impact: Update test-only Backend/Frontend components and preserve the first browser RED; new exact-head browser and combination gates follow.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend #193; Frontend #79
Why: The first exact Dev r0.3 combination failed the Frontend unused-export ratchet despite passing runtime tests.
Evidence: The failed SELF receipt is imported into the task card; regenerated Frontend knip 51 <= 52, UI knip 61 <= 61 and component build/typechecks pass.
Impact: Pin Core, Backend, Frontend and UI corrections without changing the evidence wire shape; full Dev combination follows on this HEAD.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Core #31; Backend #193; Frontend #79; UI #51
Why: The approved r0.3 candidate now has Core evidence types, Backend normalization and matching generated frontend/UI contracts.
Evidence: Core and Backend full Go suites, selected live-tag fake-provider tests, UI 165 tests/typecheck, Frontend 265 tests/build and recursive worktree verification passed locally; final Dev combination follows on this exact commit.
Impact: Advance the five component gitlinks in the existing draft; no paid model call, merge or deployment.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Core #31; Backend #193; Frontend #79; UI #51; Documents #95
Why: Carry the actual merged contract and approved permission implementation boundary into the integration composition.
Evidence: Documents PR 99 merged as a7ff466d9ae91fc67a53d2bf4991f47fc63a2a4c after independent review and verified source digest; RDM PR 360 preserves actual-actor projection semantics.
Impact: Update documentation pin, navigation and delivery records only; new composition tests and final-head CI remain required.
Refs: IAM I1 permission contract section 8; Documents PRs 98 and 99; RDM PR 360.
Why: The user approved zero-paid implementation after the written plan review, and the first main sync required component conflict resolution.
Evidence: Tool-imported first-sync failure and resolved-sync SELF receipts; Backend full Go and Frontend test/build results are recorded as local checks.
Impact: Pin Documents approval status and preserve the exact merge/sync trail; paid A01 remains unauthorized.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Documents PR #95
Why: The approved r0.3 plan must run against the current project member and IAM mainline.
Evidence: First task-sync conflict receipt was imported; Backend full Go tests and Frontend test/build passed after resolving component interactions; git diff --cached --check passed.
Impact: Combine current main with the existing U3 draft, preserving both planning entries and the Backend private project event proof transaction.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend PR #193; Frontend PR #79; Documents PR #95
Why: Record user acceptance and use the actual merged permission contract in the integration composition.
Evidence: Documents PR 98 merged as 3cf263962bd106529ee0531c8415cb16eecedfe3; independent document review and full SELF receipts retained in the task record.
Impact: Advance only Documents and delivery evidence; full IAM later increments and deployment remain outside scope.
Refs: Documents PR 98; IAM I1 U1-U2; policy/delivery.md stages 8-9.
Why: The r0.2 real-model sample failed semantic quality, and the user approved the r0.3 written design for detailed planning.
Evidence: Prior r0.2 A01 report and imported SELF receipts remain in the task card; plan self-review and git diff --cached --check passed.
Impact: Pin Documents f608ae5 and update planning state; implementation and paid model trials remain gated.
Refs: Documents PR #95; Dev PR #512
Why: The failed A01 needs a documented next design while the six PRs remain draft and unmerged.
Evidence: Independent semantic FAIL and the committed r0.3 spec with resolved links and explicit no-paid/no-implementation boundary.
Impact: Project entry and task card point to a pending design review; no new semantic behavior is enabled.
Refs: U3 r0.2 A01 assessment, r0.3 design
Why: An in-flight Documents edit correctly blocked build after the first post-sample test phase.
Evidence: Full exit-2 SELF receipt imported by make evidence; Documents report committed at 4971d0d with archive hashes.
Impact: The candidate now has a clean composition for a serial full rerun; model-quality FAIL is unchanged.
Refs: U3 r0.2 A01 assessment
Why: Keep the user-approved implementation and pending acceptance separate in the fixed integration records.
Evidence: Current Dev make test passed at10789653 and RDM combined checks passed at70e27b08; final text-only combination is verified next.
Impact: Documents and card records only; no permission source, pins in RDM, existing services or production data changes.
Refs: I1 stage 7 acceptance candidate
Why: The authorized r0.2 trial had an unsupported stage inference, while replay exposed two separate diagnostic-control defects.
Evidence: Exact paid-run files and tool-imported receipts, independent REPLAY, and Backend RED-to-GREEN/full-suite checks.
Impact: U3 quality remains FAIL; the new Backend code has no paid-model acceptance and all PRs stay draft.
Refs: U3 quality implementation plan r0.2, Task 6
Why: Preserve the human stage 6 approval separately from the synchronized formal test candidate.
Evidence: Original reviewed objects and the user approval are recorded; startup recovery and synchronization outputs are captured as complete SELF receipts.
Impact: Advance approval records only, retain all upstream membership records and enter planned I1 API/command verification. No production operations or later increments started.
Refs: User approval; policy/delivery.md stage 6 to 7
Why: The resumed task requires a fresh baseline before recording the approved implementation and formal checks.
Evidence: Startup identified SYNC_REQUIRED; Documents pointer conflict was resolved by merging the referenced upstream commit while preserving all three approved I1 documents byte-for-byte.
Impact: Workspace recovery only; retain incoming project-membership records and the fixed I1 approval objects. Formal checks remain pending.
Refs: User approval of I1 implementation; policy/governance.md startup and recovery
Why: The final base combination must reference actual reviewed main commits.
Evidence: Component PRs are merged, and each merged tree matches the independently tested candidate; whole review receipts remain unmodified.
Impact: Advance gitlinks and preserve acceptance evidence; new exact-head CI follows with no runtime changes.
Refs: Backend195 Frontend82 Documents97; feature/project-member-access
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=946cc13c9a10a2023a766b211e1148e625b62943.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Existing upload history must stay private after project adoption, and final object evidence must remain traceable.
Evidence: Original tool receipts and independent reports saved byte-for-byte; new fixed combination and CI remain pending.
Impact: Select Backend d26f3cf and proposal r1.1 with unchanged public downstream contracts; preserve workspaces and live data.
Refs: feature/project-member-access; Frontend PR82; Documents PR97
Why: A future authorized sample needs its own one-shot label rather than reusing exhausted approvals.
Evidence: Guarded label tests were RED then GREEN; full Backend Go suite passed at d89c72e.
Impact: No paid model request is triggered; the candidate SHA changes and requires fresh exact-head CI.
Refs: U3 quality implementation plan r0.2, Task 6 preparation
Why: The final zero-paid candidate needs the independent review disposition and fresh replay receipts in one composition.
Evidence: Browser receipt c4a2240e and PostgreSQL receipt 7291fe2b were imported by make evidence; Backend RED-to-GREEN fixes passed.
Impact: The task card and Documents report leave real-model validation NOT_RUN and merge gated.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: Review found three code-level failures in approval phrasing, checkpoint counting and evaluator identity.
Evidence: Each targeted regression was RED then GREEN; Backend full Go, race and live fixture checks passed at 9126dae.
Impact: The Dev composition now includes the corrected Backend while real-model QA remains NOT_RUN.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2, independent final review
Why: Keep the reviewable contract and observed verification together in the fixed parent composition.
Evidence: Dev make test passed on 0ab70b0c and RDM make test passed on ef075bd1, recorded as complete SELF receipts. Final parent pin verification follows this metadata checkpoint.
Impact: Advance the text-only review record and save evidence; no implementation components changed.
Refs: IAM I1 U1-U2 local review
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=143e6367367760deceac91ac3de5ccb3ed6adebc.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Keep the accepted IAM direction and I1 review entry visible from the authoritative integration checkout.
Evidence: Full SELF document consistency receipts are recorded in the I1 task card. Final synchronized parent combination verification follows this checkpoint.
Impact: Advance Documents only and record I1 local authorization; backend, frontend and UI behavior pins remain unchanged.
Refs: Approved IAM plan r1; I1 U1-U2
Why: The reviewed candidate must carry its accurate browser, full-build and database evidence.
Evidence: make evidence imported the exact 8c1fc39 combination and isolated PostgreSQL SELF receipts.
Impact: The report remains explicit that final HEAD checks and real-model quality are pending.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: The task-owned HTTP/browser replay and its diagnosed first failure need to be attached to the reviewable composition.
Evidence: Browser receipt f7cbd331e82a60982716bbd79bb9d54712cac4db0395966fefe08f6f380715e7 imported by make evidence.
Impact: Documents and task card distinguish mechanism PASS from real-model NOT_RUN.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
weichen