Merge pull request 'Bump backend to the EXT-8 in-proc registration fix (Backend #124) — v0.3.0 candidate pin' (#299) from feature/v030-backend-pin into main

Why: bind the task validation checkpoint to the latest integration baseline.

Evidence: SELF recursive component checks; sync_base=0d84792d678f7aeafefb52cf47b834be3e4e9011; candidate=c408cc5a0ef11ca0da5cbee7eae917e9014ed7ea.

Impact: task metadata only.

Refs: .task/feature-v030-backend-pin.md

.task/model-ab/ab-opus.json

@@ -0,0 +1,303 @@
+{
+  "target": "http://127.0.0.1:18818",
+  "model": "claude-opus-5-5",
+  "generatedAt": "2026-10-10T01:35:36Z",
+  "tasks": [
+    {
+      "id": "minutes-basic",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "帮我总结一份会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_71ccb3402c6a",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "会议纪要已经整理好了：《研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审会议纪要.docx》。lint 检查没有错误，质量评审 86 分，已通过。\n\n**会议核心结论**\n\n- **问题在设计思路，不是 bug**：现在上传文档后，系统直接出摘要、提示缺什么。评审意见是第一步应该先判断文档跟项目是否相关，再按设计开发阶段分类、打标签、存进知识库，并和研发体系的文档对应起来，做到可追溯。资料不断补充后，同一份文档应该随之更新、越来越完整。这一点目前还没有实现。\n- **会上定下的事**：\n  - 当天下午暂停写代码，先用自己的智能体写出用户需求文档、市场可行性和风险可行性报告的第一版。用户需求文档发到飞书，交说话人2确认。\n  - 以后每周做一次代码检查，由说话人1负责，陈威和庆明一起参加。\n  - 文档上传流程先把识别和打标签这部分基础功能做好。\n- **还没定的事**：\n  - 下午是全部停写代码，还是像说话人8说的“代码同步优化”，两人说法不一致。\n  - 商务对接和策划阶段要不要合并成一个阶段。\n  - 意图识别的第一层规则要不要保留。\n\n**文档里有什么**\n\n- 开头是会议信息表，后面是结论摘要和四张要点卡片。\n- 讨论分 9 个议题，每个议题都有要点、分歧、结论和一句话总结，要点后面注明了发言人和原文时间戳。\n- 最后是 6 条决议、11 项待办、8 个未决问题。\n\n**需要你留意的地方**\n\n- 原文没写会议时间、地点、主持人和缺席人员，这几项都标成了“文档未明确”。\n- 待办里原文没给负责人或期限的，写的是“未指明”。\n- 原文的发言人只有“说话人1”到“说话人11”的编号，我保留了编号，没有去推测真名。\n- 原文里的人名是语音转写的，可能有同音错字，比如陈磊和陈丽、张熙哲和张希哲。我都按原文保留，并在文末列了出来，请你核对一下。\n\n**样式**：用的是默认的 modern 主题，A4 纸，没有套模板，也没有仿照别的文档。如果要改成公文样式、换主色，或者套你们自己的模板，告诉我一声就行。\n\n**还可以生成**\n\n- **智能笔记**：按时间线逐段整理谁说了什么，方便回查原话。说一句“生成智能笔记”就行。\n- **洞察报告**：分析这次评审暴露出的产品设计问题和风险，给出改进方向。说一句“生成洞察报告”就行。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_71ccb3402c6a",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-10T01:35:36.121125241Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-10T01:51:05.149552779Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 1941396,
+              "completionTokens": 11251,
+              "totalTokens": 1952647,
+              "durationMs": 929028,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 28,
+            "toolFailures": 13,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 2,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 3,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "用户要求总结会议纪要。终轮回复声称已生成《研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审会议纪要.docx》，工件清单中确有该 docx（art_ca6946e12656，50198 字节）。工具记录显示文件已通过 lint 检查，最新一次质量评审得分为 86 分（passed:true）。尽管早期 #22 质量评审曾报找不到文件，但 #23/#26 后续检查已通过，且内置质量检查确认交付物存在且非空、版式与内容评分通过，应以最后一次为准。用户要求已完成。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审会议纪要.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 930924
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 28,
+        "toolFailures": 13,
+        "fullRegens": 0,
+        "apiDiscovery": 2,
+        "readsOriginal": 0,
+        "planUpdates": 3,
+        "verifierChecks": 1
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "plan-followup",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "帮我总结一份会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_fcfdb8e4decb",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "会议纪要已生成，文件是《研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审会议纪要.docx》。lint 没有报错，质量自检 86 分，通过。\n\n**会议结论**：评审意见主要来自说话人2。他认为产品没做到“渐进式清晰”：上传文档后缺了几步，即先判断和项目是否相关、按设计开发阶段归类、打标签入库。他还指出团队还没自举，也就是没有先用自己的智能体给这个产品写需求。会议要求暂停写代码，先写出用户需求 1.0 和设计输入，交他确认；同时每周做一次代码评审。\n\n**纪要内容**\n- **会议信息**：时间、地点、主持人、缺席都写了“文档未明确”。时长按录音时间戳估算，约 97 分钟。\n- **七个议题**：文档上传处理、基线与记忆系统、工作流阶段权限、需求追溯、代码与架构可控性、意图识别规则层、自举。每个议题都分要点、分歧、结论，发言注明说话人编号和时间戳。\n- **视觉摘要**：开头有一组三张卡片，概括三条核心判断。\n- **决议**：四条，用编号列表。\n- **待办**：九项，按序号、事项、负责人、期限、状态列成表。原文没写的负责人和期限标“未指明”；有几项原文只说“你/你们”，表里照原话注明。\n- **未决问题**：七个，比如下午是否完全停止写代码。说话人2要求停，说话人8说代码同步优化，两人说法不一致。\n- **称谓说明**：放在文末。发言人保留“说话人1”至“说话人11”，没有推测真名。\n\n**需要你核对的地方**\n- 转写稿里有些人名可能是同一人的不同转写，比如齐哲、张熙哲、张希哲，陈磊和陈丽，秦苗和庆明。我都按原文保留，在文末列了出来。\n- “SQL”“提尔斯”“哈尼斯”这类词疑似转写错误。只有“SQL”能从上下文确认实际指 skill，其余照录并标了“原文如此”。\n\n**样式**：用的是默认 modern 主题（微软雅黑，主色深蓝灰，A4 纸），没有用模板或仿照其他文档。如果要改成公文格式、换主色，或补上会议日期和参会人真名，直接告诉我，我改好后另存一个新版本。\n\n**还可以生成**\n- 智能笔记（按时间线）：可以按时间顺序逐段回查谁说了什么，适合核对原话。说一句“生成智能笔记”就行。\n- 洞察报告：分析这次评审暴露的产品设计问题和风险，以及接下来的优先级建议。说一句“生成洞察报告”就行。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_fcfdb8e4decb",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-10T01:51:07.075046035Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-10T01:59:37.466270673Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 888233,
+              "completionTokens": 10149,
+              "totalTokens": 898382,
+              "durationMs": 510391,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 17,
+            "toolFailures": 1,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 1,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 4,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "用户要求是总结一份会议纪要。终轮回复声称已生成《研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审会议纪要.docx》，且本轮工件清单中确实存在该文件（art_9c2e511311cb，49130 字节）。内置质量检查最新一次（#14）为 passed true，score 86，lint 已运行；尽管更早 #12 曾因文件不存在未通过，但 #13 显示文件已生成，#14 已重新检查并通过，按后一次检查覆盖前一次规则，应判定通过。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审会议纪要.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 510492
+        },
+        {
+          "user": "根据这个纪要，制定一个方案",
+          "runId": "run_37976a685c0c",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "我修复了核查标出的一处问题，修订版另存为《研发智能体整改与自举实施方案（修订）.docx》，lint 没有报错，已登记。\n\n问题出在会议信息表的“编制日期”一栏。那里写的 2026-10-10 是今天的系统日期，会议材料里找不到，转写稿也没写会议日期。修订版在日期后加了标注：“按编制当日系统日期填写，非会议材料内容；会议日期文档未明确”。\n\n正文其他地方没有再出现这个日期，方案内容没有改动。原文件保留未覆盖，以修订版为准。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_37976a685c0c",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-10T01:59:37.561334781Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-10T02:07:45.361104336Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 1797770,
+              "completionTokens": 6311,
+              "totalTokens": 1804081,
+              "durationMs": 487799,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 20,
+            "toolFailures": 8,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 1,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 2
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "事实核查：交付物里以下数字/日期在本次材料中找不到出处：2026-10-10。逐条二选一：改成材料里能找到的数值，或删除/明确标注为推测或目标值（如“目标 85%”）。不要保留无法回溯的裸数字。"
+            },
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "用户要求是根据纪要制定一个方案。终轮回复说明修订版《研发智能体整改与自举实施方案（修订）.docx》已生成并登记，工件清单中有该 docx 和原版 docx；内置质量检查显示文件存在非空、版式与内容评分通过，lint 最后一次无报错。方案内容完整且以修订版为准，用户要求已完成。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "研发智能体整改与自举实施方案（修订）.docx",
+            "研发智能体整改与自举实施方案.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 489605
+        },
+        {
+          "user": "方案太简要了，给我一个详细的方案和计划",
+          "runId": "run_812d475ea9d4",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "我核实过了，这份文件不用改。“13485”在会议原文里有出处：00:10:02 说话人2说要看文档“是不是咱们体系内的文档，13485要求的文档”，在 inputs/meeting-rd-agent-asr.md 第 89 行。方案里引用这个数的两处都标了这个时间戳，核查没对上原文，所以误报了。\n\n《研发智能体整改与自举详细实施方案.docx》仍是最终版本，没有重新生成。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_812d475ea9d4",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-10T02:07:47.168355327Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-10T02:14:05.344697581Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 831589,
+              "completionTokens": 10094,
+              "totalTokens": 841683,
+              "durationMs": 378175,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 8,
+            "toolFailures": 0,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 1,
+            "planUpdates": 2,
+            "verifierChecks": 2
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "事实核查：交付物里以下数字/日期在本次材料中找不到出处：13485。逐条二选一：改成材料里能找到的数值，或删除/明确标注为推测或目标值（如“目标 85%”）。不要保留无法回溯的裸数字。"
+            },
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "工件清单中有《研发智能体整改与自举详细实施方案.docx》（art_f61f508a0079，107577字节），内容包含阶段一至阶段三、组织分工、管理机制、验收用例、风险、启动前决策和近期行动等详细章节，共19个表格，且质量检查通过（passed:true, score:86）。该交付物满足用户对“详细方案和计划”的要求。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "研发智能体整改与自举详细实施方案.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 378632
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 45,
+        "toolFailures": 9,
+        "fullRegens": 0,
+        "apiDiscovery": 2,
+        "readsOriginal": 1,
+        "planUpdates": 6,
+        "verifierChecks": 5
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "qa-citation",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "这次会议最主要的事情是什么",
+          "runId": "run_c5adbbfea58e",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "# 会议核心：先停开发，\"自举\"重定需求\n\n这次会议最主要的事是**说话人2（主导评审的人）否定了当前研发智能体的产品设计思路，要求团队暂停写代码，先用自己的智能体给这个产品写清楚用户需求，也就是\"自举\"**。\n\n## 一、否定的是什么：上传文档的处理逻辑走错了方向\n\n说话人1 演示的流程是：上传文档后，先做结构化梳理，再提示文档缺什么信息，最后建议下一步（00:04:14、00:31:13）。说话人2 认为这套流程是通用的，没有和研发体系强挂钩（00:32:19）。他提出上传文档本质上是\"建立记忆系统的过程\"，要和\"输出内容\"在程序上分开（01:21:25），应按下面的顺序处理：\n\n1. **判断相关性**：先看文档和本项目有没有关系。相关度低就向用户确认，避免传错（00:20:35）。\n2. **拆解并打标签**：按设计开发阶段（策划、需求、设计、验证、确认）逐页、逐节标注文档对应哪个阶段、哪些工作。一份文档可以打多个标签（00:21:44、01:30:40）。\n3. **摘要入库**：每个标签下写一段简要描述，必要时切片后存入知识库（00:22:11）。\n4. **渐进式更新**：和现有基线文档比对，判断是补充细节还是有冲突。补充内容先找用户确认；冲突内容如果已经评审过，就走变更流程（00:22:28–00:23:29）。\n5. **及时反馈**：读完一段就和用户确认一段，不要后台拉起小队跑 20 分钟才给结果（01:24:18、01:26:14）。\n\n他用\"画马\"作比喻：基线草稿一直保留，每次上传的资料都往里补细节，逐步变清晰（00:13:43–00:15:12）。他的结论是：\"这不是 bug，这是一个产品设计理念和设计方法的问题\"（01:29:31）。\n\n## 二、决定做什么：暂停开发，先自举\n\n| 事项 | 负责人 | 时间 | 出处 |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| 暂停写代码，用自己的智能体给本产品写用户需求（1.0 版）和设计输入，再找说话人2 确认 | 说话人1 团队 | 当天下午开始 | 01:14:58、01:36:46、01:37:48 |\n| 用户需求文档发到飞书 | 说话人1 | 下次会议前（具体日期未指明） | 01:15:28 |\n| 一并出市场可行性、风险等报告的第一版 | 未指明 | 未指明 | 01:36:46 |\n| 把智能助手加入测试群，下午细化开发范式 | 说话人8 | 当天下午 | 01:37:39、01:38:16 |\n| 和陈威、庆明每周做一次代码 review | 说话人1 牵头（\"这个责任是你管的\"） | 每周，具体时间未指明 | 01:03:22 |\n\n## 三、顺带提出的其他问题\n\n- **架构失控**：现场找不到处理上传文档的 skill，说话人2 认为对 AI 生成代码的掌控力度太粗（00:34:07–00:37:39）。\n- **工作流划分**：商务对接阶段不能生成研发阶段的任务书。会上倾向把商务对接和策划阶段合并（00:24:06–00:25:32）。\n- **意图识别**：第一层规则匹配短指令（如\"确认\"）有隐患，建议改成可点击的确认卡片（00:58:08）。\n- **需求追溯表**：说话人1 已经在做，说话人2 要求先把上面讲的基础流程做好（00:30:56）。\n\n这些问题都从属于同一个结论：产品没有先定义清楚需求。所以会议给出的方向不是修 bug，而是先\"自举\"，把产品本身的需求立起来。\n\n说明：转写稿里的人名经过语音识别，可能不准确（例如称呼说话人1 时出现过\"陈磊\"\"陈丽\"），上表人名按原文保留。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_c5adbbfea58e",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-10T02:14:05.843085453Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-10T02:14:46.1512207Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 49286,
+              "completionTokens": 1123,
+              "totalTokens": 50409,
+              "durationMs": 40307,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 0,
+            "toolFailures": 0,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "终轮回复直接回答了用户问题，明确指出会议最主要的事是否定当前产品思路、暂停开发并自举重定需求，内容完整且与会议内容相关。本轮无工具和工件要求，回复本身已满足要求。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 42057
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 0,
+        "toolFailures": 0,
+        "fullRegens": 0,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 0,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 1
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "minutes-pm-tool",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "生成会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_a1317031aaaf",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "我已生成纪要摘要「智能体项目管理工具会议纪要.docx」并登记，下方卡片可以预览和下载。lint 没有 error，quality_review 通过，得分 86。\n\n**会议的主要结论**\n- 不另开专家会，马上开始写结题报告，要按政府决策行文的风格写，下周评审前完成。缺少第三方测试的风险有人提出，但会上没有给出应对办法。\n- 原型经过一周打磨，说话人1 的评价是“像给人用的了”，方向不再调整。修改文件时以一个主文件为准，相关文件按强、中、弱三级关联同步修改。用户通过对话操作，不需要打开管理界面。产品做成网页，中间文件不保留。\n- 下一步先拿本项目自己来跑一遍项目管理流程（会上叫“自举”）。智能体部分由陈威继续开发。飞书对接由另一位参会者负责，原文没说清是谁。\n\n**文档结构**\n- 开头是会议信息表，后面依次是摘要和三张卡片（已定、待定、下一步）。\n- 讨论按 9 个议题分节，每节都有要点、分歧和结论，并附原文时间戳。\n- 后面有 7 条编号决议、13 项待办事项表格、9 条未决问题，最后是称谓说明。\n\n**需要你留意的地方**\n- 原文只有“说话人1”到“说话人8”，我都按原样保留，没有猜真名。\n- 会议的时间、地点、主持人和缺席人员原文都没写，标为“文档未明确”。待办事项里大多数负责人和期限也标为“未指明”。\n- 00:44 到 00:59 的演示段，转写稿几乎都算在说话人1名下。但这段既有开发者的讲解，也有主持人的评价，所以这部分要点没有归到具体某个人。\n\n**样式**：用的是默认的 modern 主题，没有套模板，也没有仿照其他文档。源文件是同名的 .md。想改成公文风格、换主色或者删减章节，直接告诉我就行，我改完重新生成。\n\n**还可以生成**\n- 智能笔记：按时间线逐段回查谁说了什么，适合核对原话。说一句“生成智能笔记”就行。\n- 洞察报告：分析这个工具方案的风险、成本和优先级，比如 token 消耗、修改范围怎么划、第三方测试缺失。说一句“生成洞察报告”就行。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_a1317031aaaf",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-10T02:14:47.929263704Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-10T02:22:08.85522226Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 1513809,
+              "completionTokens": 10435,
+              "totalTokens": 1524244,
+              "durationMs": 440925,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 26,
+            "toolFailures": 11,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 2,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 3,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "交付物「智能体项目管理工具会议纪要.docx」已生成并登记（art_9133f6ccf526）。终轮回复说明文件已生成并给出会议结论、文档结构和样式说明；工具证据显示最后一次 read/lint/quality_review 均通过：quality_review 通过且得分 86，lint 0 error，且 #24 明确 passed=true。工件清单中存在该 docx 文件。早期 #18 的 lint error 已被后续 #20/#21 的 lint 通过覆盖，因此以最后一次为准。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "智能体项目管理工具会议纪要.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 441460
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 26,
+        "toolFailures": 11,
+        "fullRegens": 0,
+        "apiDiscovery": 2,
+        "readsOriginal": 0,
+        "planUpdates": 3,
+        "verifierChecks": 1
+      }
+    }
+  ]
+}

.task/model-ab/ab-sonnet-quota-blocked-r2.json

@@ -0,0 +1,273 @@
+{
+  "target": "http://127.0.0.1:18818",
+  "model": "claude-sonnet-4-6",
+  "generatedAt": "2026-10-10T01:09:08Z",
+  "tasks": [
+    {
+      "id": "minutes-basic",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "帮我总结一份会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_1d1b75894031",
+          "status": "failed",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_1d1b75894031",
+            "status": "failed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-10T01:09:08.613748284Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-10T01:09:08.989793832Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 0,
+              "completionTokens": 0,
+              "totalTokens": 0,
+              "durationMs": 375,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": {
+              "code": "run.failed",
+              "message": "provider status 403: {\"error\":{\"message\":\"预扣费额度失败, 用户剩余额度: ¥0.481270, 需要预扣费额度: ¥0.639676 (request id: 20261010010908872191956c14228f5LE33NPe6)\",\"type\":\"dmx_api_error\",\"param\":\"\",\"code\":\"insufficient_user_quota\"}}"
+            }
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 0,
+            "toolFailures": 0,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 0
+          },
+          "issues": [
+            "run 终态=failed"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 3015
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 0,
+        "toolFailures": 0,
+        "fullRegens": 0,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 0,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 0
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "plan-followup",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "帮我总结一份会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_afc0a61cacf2",
+          "status": "failed",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_afc0a61cacf2",
+            "status": "failed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-10T01:09:11.656786831Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-10T01:09:11.893616355Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 0,
+              "completionTokens": 0,
+              "totalTokens": 0,
+              "durationMs": 236,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": {
+              "code": "run.failed",
+              "message": "provider status 403: {\"error\":{\"message\":\"预扣费额度失败, 用户剩余额度: ¥0.481270, 需要预扣费额度: ¥0.639676 (request id: 20261010010911773862622c14228f5YkAIYOVw)\",\"type\":\"dmx_api_error\",\"param\":\"\",\"code\":\"insufficient_user_quota\"}}"
+            }
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 0,
+            "toolFailures": 0,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 0
+          },
+          "issues": [
+            "run 终态=failed"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 3015
+        },
+        {
+          "user": "根据这个纪要，制定一个方案",
+          "runId": "run_5469ffb2b1e8",
+          "status": "failed",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_5469ffb2b1e8",
+            "status": "failed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-10T01:09:14.666859474Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-10T01:09:14.91867424Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 0,
+              "completionTokens": 0,
+              "totalTokens": 0,
+              "durationMs": 251,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": {
+              "code": "run.failed",
+              "message": "provider status 403: {\"error\":{\"message\":\"预扣费额度失败, 用户剩余额度: ¥0.481270, 需要预扣费额度: ¥0.643980 (request id: 20261010010914796690798c14228f5ffC1TuM1)\",\"type\":\"dmx_api_error\",\"param\":\"\",\"code\":\"insufficient_user_quota\"}}"
+            }
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 0,
+            "toolFailures": 0,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 0
+          },
+          "issues": [
+            "run 终态=failed"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 3009
+        },
+        {
+          "user": "方案太简要了，给我一个详细的方案和计划",
+          "runId": "run_44d8e44329c1",
+          "status": "failed",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_44d8e44329c1",
+            "status": "failed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-10T01:09:17.676939798Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-10T01:09:17.908257876Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 0,
+              "completionTokens": 0,
+              "totalTokens": 0,
+              "durationMs": 230,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": {
+              "code": "run.failed",
+              "message": "provider status 403: {\"error\":{\"message\":\"预扣费额度失败, 用户剩余额度: ¥0.481270, 需要预扣费额度: ¥0.641310 (request id: 20261010010917792532559c14228f5zBbrG4Ys)\",\"type\":\"dmx_api_error\",\"param\":\"\",\"code\":\"insufficient_user_quota\"}}"
+            }
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 0,
+            "toolFailures": 0,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 0
+          },
+          "issues": [
+            "run 终态=failed"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 3010
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 0,
+        "toolFailures": 0,
+        "fullRegens": 0,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 0,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 0
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "qa-citation",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "这次会议最主要的事情是什么",
+          "runId": "run_8fdbd657aac6",
+          "status": "failed",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_8fdbd657aac6",
+            "status": "failed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-10T01:09:20.722489969Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-10T01:09:20.964194557Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 0,
+              "completionTokens": 0,
+              "totalTokens": 0,
+              "durationMs": 241,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": {
+              "code": "run.failed",
+              "message": "provider status 403: {\"error\":{\"message\":\"预扣费额度失败, 用户剩余额度: ¥0.481270, 需要预扣费额度: ¥0.621570 (request id: 20261010010920842728880c14228f5Cf9JCa0A)\",\"type\":\"dmx_api_error\",\"param\":\"\",\"code\":\"insufficient_user_quota\"}}"
+            }
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 0,
+            "toolFailures": 0,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 0
+          },
+          "issues": [
+            "run 终态=failed"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 3014
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 0,
+        "toolFailures": 0,
+        "fullRegens": 0,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 0,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 0
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "minutes-pm-tool",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "生成会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_b098ee9816d0",
+          "status": "failed",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_b098ee9816d0",
+            "status": "failed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-10T01:09:23.760559705Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-10T01:09:23.994461306Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 0,
+              "completionTokens": 0,
+              "totalTokens": 0,
+              "durationMs": 233,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": {
+              "code": "run.failed",
+              "message": "provider status 403: {\"error\":{\"message\":\"预扣费额度失败, 用户剩余额度: ¥0.481270, 需要预扣费额度: ¥0.580006 (request id: 20261010010923876222810c14228f5Y967SyTT)\",\"type\":\"dmx_api_error\",\"param\":\"\",\"code\":\"insufficient_user_quota\"}}"
+            }
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 0,
+            "toolFailures": 0,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 0
+          },
+          "issues": [
+            "run 终态=failed"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 3015
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 0,
+        "toolFailures": 0,
+        "fullRegens": 0,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 0,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 0
+      }
+    }
+  ]
+}

.task/model-ab/ab-sonnet-quota-blocked.json

@@ -0,0 +1,273 @@
+{
+  "target": "http://127.0.0.1:18818",
+  "model": "claude-sonnet-4-6",
+  "generatedAt": "2026-10-10T00:54:12Z",
+  "tasks": [
+    {
+      "id": "minutes-basic",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "帮我总结一份会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_8907f5da5b7d",
+          "status": "failed",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_8907f5da5b7d",
+            "status": "failed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-10T00:54:12.788678154Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-10T00:56:53.130247413Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 442455,
+              "completionTokens": 6006,
+              "totalTokens": 448461,
+              "durationMs": 160340,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": {
+              "code": "run.failed",
+              "message": "provider status 403: {\"error\":{\"message\":\"insufficient user quota (request id: 20261010005652819424504c14228f51XR3Ai7h)\",\"type\":\"dmx_api_error\",\"param\":\"\",\"code\":\"insufficient_user_quota\"}}"
+            }
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 10,
+            "toolFailures": 1,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 1,
+            "planUpdates": 2,
+            "verifierChecks": 0
+          },
+          "issues": [
+            "run 终态=failed"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 162188
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 10,
+        "toolFailures": 1,
+        "fullRegens": 0,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 1,
+        "planUpdates": 2,
+        "verifierChecks": 0
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "plan-followup",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "帮我总结一份会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_3e588b3acda5",
+          "status": "failed",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_3e588b3acda5",
+            "status": "failed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-10T00:56:54.999291168Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-10T00:56:55.416959882Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 0,
+              "completionTokens": 0,
+              "totalTokens": 0,
+              "durationMs": 416,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": {
+              "code": "run.failed",
+              "message": "provider status 403: {\"error\":{\"message\":\"insufficient user quota (request id: 20261010005655105260974c14228f50Czxx8KV)\",\"type\":\"dmx_api_error\",\"param\":\"\",\"code\":\"insufficient_user_quota\"}}"
+            }
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 0,
+            "toolFailures": 0,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 0
+          },
+          "issues": [
+            "run 终态=failed"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 3015
+        },
+        {
+          "user": "根据这个纪要，制定一个方案",
+          "runId": "run_5489cca9189c",
+          "status": "failed",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_5489cca9189c",
+            "status": "failed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-10T00:56:58.010366407Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-10T00:56:58.412815147Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 0,
+              "completionTokens": 0,
+              "totalTokens": 0,
+              "durationMs": 401,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": {
+              "code": "run.failed",
+              "message": "provider status 403: {\"error\":{\"message\":\"insufficient user quota (request id: 20261010005658116229887c14228f5fZFJecbf)\",\"type\":\"dmx_api_error\",\"param\":\"\",\"code\":\"insufficient_user_quota\"}}"
+            }
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 0,
+            "toolFailures": 0,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 0
+          },
+          "issues": [
+            "run 终态=failed"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 3012
+        },
+        {
+          "user": "方案太简要了，给我一个详细的方案和计划",
+          "runId": "run_6f9390b47d94",
+          "status": "failed",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_6f9390b47d94",
+            "status": "failed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-10T00:57:01.021868203Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-10T00:57:01.393626511Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 0,
+              "completionTokens": 0,
+              "totalTokens": 0,
+              "durationMs": 371,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": {
+              "code": "run.failed",
+              "message": "provider status 403: {\"error\":{\"message\":\"insufficient user quota (request id: 20261010005701124159262c14228f539OcuPSC)\",\"type\":\"dmx_api_error\",\"param\":\"\",\"code\":\"insufficient_user_quota\"}}"
+            }
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 0,
+            "toolFailures": 0,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 0
+          },
+          "issues": [
+            "run 终态=failed"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 3010
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 0,
+        "toolFailures": 0,
+        "fullRegens": 0,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 0,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 0
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "qa-citation",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "这次会议最主要的事情是什么",
+          "runId": "run_2a4f810f7f7d",
+          "status": "failed",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_2a4f810f7f7d",
+            "status": "failed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-10T00:57:04.067803899Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-10T00:57:04.303285404Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 0,
+              "completionTokens": 0,
+              "totalTokens": 0,
+              "durationMs": 234,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": {
+              "code": "run.failed",
+              "message": "provider status 403: {\"error\":{\"message\":\"预扣费额度失败, 用户剩余额度: ¥0.491620, 需要预扣费额度: ¥0.621570 (request id: 20261010005704171163733c14228f5cukGTKzy)\",\"type\":\"dmx_api_error\",\"param\":\"\",\"code\":\"insufficient_user_quota\"}}"
+            }
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 0,
+            "toolFailures": 0,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 0
+          },
+          "issues": [
+            "run 终态=failed"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 3017
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 0,
+        "toolFailures": 0,
+        "fullRegens": 0,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 0,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 0
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "minutes-pm-tool",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "生成会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_88b97836445f",
+          "status": "failed",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_88b97836445f",
+            "status": "failed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-10T00:57:07.104785963Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-10T00:57:07.322331234Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 0,
+              "completionTokens": 0,
+              "totalTokens": 0,
+              "durationMs": 217,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": {
+              "code": "run.failed",
+              "message": "provider status 403: {\"error\":{\"message\":\"预扣费额度失败, 用户剩余额度: ¥0.491620, 需要预扣费额度: ¥0.580006 (request id: 20261010005707207307505c14228f559A506wI)\",\"type\":\"dmx_api_error\",\"param\":\"\",\"code\":\"insufficient_user_quota\"}}"
+            }
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 0,
+            "toolFailures": 0,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 0
+          },
+          "issues": [
+            "run 终态=failed"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 3012
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 0,
+        "toolFailures": 0,
+        "fullRegens": 0,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 0,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 0
+      }
+    }
+  ]
+}

.task/phase01-eval/after-phase01-b68833f.json

@@ -0,0 +1,334 @@
+{
+  "target": "http://127.0.0.1:18813",
+  "model": "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed",
+  "generatedAt": "2026-10-09T13:30:57Z",
+  "tasks": [
+    {
+      "id": "minutes-basic",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "帮我总结一份会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_d8aef286c241",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "会议纪要已生成并登记。\n\n**文件**：研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审会议纪要.docx\n\n---\n\n本次会议围绕“研发智能体文档处理与自举方案”形成以下关键决议：\n\n1. **产品设计理念需重构**：从当前“任务式”改为“渐进式记忆系统”，上传文档先打标签入库，不直接输出内容\n2. **自举工作刻不容缓**：停止代码开发，优先建立用户需求文档（1.0版），找说话人2确认后再继续\n3. **建立代码 review 机制**：每周与陈威、秦明一起 review，控制代码架构质量\n4. **深入业务场景**：参加项目会议，理解实际业务流程\n\n**最高优先级待办**：停止代码开发，先把用户需求文档写清楚。\n\n---\n\n文档采用现代风格，包含9个一级章节，并在文末添加了关键结论状态卡作为视觉摘要，适合快速浏览核心决策点。\n\n如需其他版本，还可以生成**智能笔记（按时间线还原讨论过程）**或**一页纸精简版**，请告诉我。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_d8aef286c241",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T13:30:57.210011069Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T13:35:27.014216189Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 945117,
+              "completionTokens": 17227,
+              "totalTokens": 962344,
+              "durationMs": 269803,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 27,
+            "toolFailures": 8,
+            "fullRegens": 6,
+            "apiDiscovery": 5,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "验证器返回无法解析"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审会议纪要.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 270292
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 27,
+        "toolFailures": 8,
+        "fullRegens": 6,
+        "apiDiscovery": 5,
+        "readsOriginal": 0,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 1
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "plan-followup",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "帮我总结一份会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_d782147e751a",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "会议纪要已生成。\n\n**交付物**：`会议纪要_研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审.docx`\n\n**内容要点**：\n- **会议信息**：时间、参会人员、主持人、记录人\n- **文档上传功能现状与问题**：现状描述、核心分歧、结论\n- **产品设计评审**：RAG方案、Agent自举方案、架构设计\n- **其他议题**：多Agent协作、数据存储与检索\n- **下一步行动**：待确认事项、负责人与时间节点\n\n**当前状态**：文档标题层级跳跃问题已修复，结构现为标题 → 会议概况 → 各章节层级连续。文件已保存并可预览。\n\n**验证说明**：自动格式检查工具暂不可用，但文档内容与结构已完整输出，如需调整格式或补充内容可随时告知。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_d782147e751a",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T13:35:27.537480285Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T13:41:26.06216021Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 1289502,
+              "completionTokens": 18436,
+              "totalTokens": 1307938,
+              "durationMs": 358524,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 36,
+            "toolFailures": 6,
+            "fullRegens": 5,
+            "apiDiscovery": 2,
+            "readsOriginal": 18,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 3
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "会议纪要_研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审.docx：版式 heading-skip：标题从 无 跳到 2"
+            },
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "会议纪要_研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审.docx：版式 heading-skip：标题从 无 跳到 2"
+            },
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "验证器返回无法解析"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "会议纪要_研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审.docx",
+            "会议纪要_研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审.docx",
+            "会议纪要_研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 360360
+        },
+        {
+          "user": "根据这个纪要，制定一个方案",
+          "runId": "run_3b6a64f41eb8",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "**方案已生成**：`研发智能体文档处理与自举实施方案.docx`\n\n方案共 8 章，涵盖：\n\n1. **背景与目标** — 5 个 P0/P1 问题 + 5 项方案目标\n2. **文档上传功能重构（记忆系统）** — 新流程 6 步、旧新流程对比表、实施要点\n3. **渐进式清晰实现路径** — 基线机制、迭代完善流程、与记忆系统的关系\n4. **需求追溯体系完善** — 目标追溯结构（UR→SR→SD→Code→TC→Reg）、实施路径\n5. **技术架构改进** — 代码 review 机制、架构守护人制度\n6. **智能体自举实施路径** — 4 阶段实施步骤、决策依据\n7. **风险与应对** — 5 项风险评估与应对措施\n8. **附录** — 发言人称谓说明\n\n方案忠实执行了评审会决策，未作取舍扩展。如需进一步分解为技术详细设计、评审汇报材料或分阶段实施计划，可继续生成。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_3b6a64f41eb8",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T13:41:27.892288287Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T13:43:44.290051181Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 159289,
+              "completionTokens": 7915,
+              "totalTokens": 167204,
+              "durationMs": 136397,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 7,
+            "toolFailures": 1,
+            "fullRegens": 2,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 6,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "终轮回复声称已生成方案，工件清单中有对应文件 art_db92aa595893（43324 字节）。工具 #3 发现空章节错误，但工具 #4 显示内容已补全（5.1、5.2、6.1、6.2、6.3、7、8 节均有正文），工具 #6 仅剩 warning（缺少视觉摘要）。内置质量检查确认「文件存在且非空、版式与内容评分通过」。按「后一次检查覆盖前一次」规则，错误已被修复。方案结构完整（8 章），满足用户「制定一个方案」的要求。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "研发智能体文档处理与自举实施方案.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 138231
+        },
+        {
+          "user": "方案太简要了，给我一个详细的方案和计划",
+          "runId": "run_2e4890fbcd61",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "已为你生成详细的方案文档：**研发智能体文档处理与自举详细实施方案.docx**\n\n文档包含以下内容：\n\n1. **方案概述**\n   - 背景与问题\n   - 核心目标（三大目标）\n   - 方案价值与预期收益\n   - 实施里程碑时间线（12周）\n\n2. **现状问题详细分析**\n   - 问题一：文档上传流程缺乏记忆机制\n   - 问题二：产品设计理念偏离研发体系\n   - 问题三：需求追溯链不完整\n   - 问题四：代码管理与架构问题\n\n3. **详细解决方案**（含流程图和时序图）\n   - 记忆系统重构\n   - 追溯网络建立\n   - 自举路径完善\n\n4. **实施计划**\n   - 阶段划分\n   - 里程碑与验收标准\n   - 风险应对\n\n文档已按详细方案的结构展开，包含了完整的现状分析、解决方案、实施路径和验收标准。\n\n---\n\n**本轮检查未通过**：第1行标题\"1. 方案概述\"是栏目名，不是判断句。需要改为结论先行的一句判断，例如\"通过重构记忆系统、建立追溯网络、完善自举路径，实现文档处理能力的系统性升级\"，后续再展开各栏目内容。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_2e4890fbcd61",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T13:43:46.122947575Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T13:56:46.934787054Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 2013718,
+              "completionTokens": 56303,
+              "totalTokens": 2070021,
+              "durationMs": 780811,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 35,
+            "toolFailures": 6,
+            "fullRegens": 5,
+            "apiDiscovery": 1,
+            "readsOriginal": 25,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 4
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "研发智能体文档处理与自举详细实施方案.docx：结论先行：标题是栏目名，不是判断；可读性：第 1 行标题是栏目名，不是判断，改成一句结论；总分 60，低于 70"
+            },
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "研发智能体文档处理与自举详细实施方案.docx：结论先行：标题是栏目名，不是判断；可读性：第 1 行标题是栏目名，不是判断，改成一句结论；总分 60，低于 70"
+            },
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "研发智能体文档处理与自举详细实施方案.docx：结论先行：标题是栏目名，不是判断；可读性：第 1 行标题是栏目名，不是判断，改成一句结论；总分 60，低于 70"
+            },
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "研发智能体文档处理与自举详细实施方案.docx：结论先行：标题是栏目名，不是判断；可读性：第 1 行标题是栏目名，不是判断，改成一句结论；总分 60，低于 70"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "研发智能体文档处理与自举详细实施方案.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 781367
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 78,
+        "toolFailures": 13,
+        "fullRegens": 12,
+        "apiDiscovery": 3,
+        "readsOriginal": 49,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 8
+      },
+      "unverifiedFacts": [
+        "85%",
+        "90%",
+        "100%",
+        "15%",
+        "78%",
+        "80%",
+        "75%",
+        "99%",
+        "20%",
+        "70%",
+        "50%",
+        "0%",
+        "20261009"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "qa-citation",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "这次会议最主要的事情是什么",
+          "runId": "run_ccbf5f9aa497",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "## 会议总结\n\n### 最主要的事：产品设计理念被否定，要求停止开发、先做自举\n\n会上发言者（简称「领导」）对当前研发智能体的文档处理方案给出了全面否定的评价，核心结论如下：\n\n**1. 产品设计思路存在根本性问题**\n- 上传文档后直接生成目标文档（如项目建议书），缺少渐进式的信息积累和确认过程。\n- 没有实现「渐进式清晰」——用户上传文件时应该先打标签、进入知识库、与现有体系对照，而不是一上来就生成完整文档。\n- 当前设计是「任务式」而非「知识管理式」——系统没有把上传文档当作构建记忆库的过程，而是当作直接生成文档的触发器。\n\n**2. 被要求立即停止写代码**\n\u003e \"你先把代码停了，先把自己的需求文档写出来。先把你的市场可行性、风险可行性报告你先做了。你先出第一版。\"\n\n**3. 自举是唯一出路**\n- 产品必须先服务自己——用这套系统管理自身的研发项目、形成需求文档和体系文档。\n- 会上以比亚迪 BP 上传后不一定生成文档为例，强调上传是丰富知识库的手段，而非触发文档编写的信号。\n- 只有自举形成可用的产品，才能真正理解场景并向客户推广。\n\n**4. 会议达成的具体行动**\n| 事项 | 负责人 | 时间 |\n|------|--------|------|\n| 暂停代码开发 | 陈磊团队 | 立即 |\n| 整理 1.0 版用户需求文档 | 陈磊 | 下午 |\n| 将智能助手加入测试飞书群 | 待定 | 待定 |\n| 建立代码 review 机制（每周与陈威、庆明 review） | 待定 | 每周 |\n\n**一句话结论：** 现有方案被推翻，要求团队先做使用方、用系统管理自己的项目，形成需求文档后再谈开发。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_ccbf5f9aa497",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T13:56:47.540252751Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T13:57:25.199180594Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 21828,
+              "completionTokens": 969,
+              "totalTokens": 22797,
+              "durationMs": 37658,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 0,
+            "toolFailures": 0,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "用户问的是会议最主要的事是什么，终轮回复直接在开头明确回答了核心结论：产品设计理念被否定，要求停止开发、先做自举。回复提供了层次分明的总结，包括4个具体要点、具体行动项和一句话结论，完全回答了用户的问题。本轮无工具调用和工件生成，符合只回答问题的场景。内置质量检查通过（检查的是历史文件存在且非空，与本次回答无关）。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 39050
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 0,
+        "toolFailures": 0,
+        "fullRegens": 0,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 0,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 1
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "minutes-pm-tool",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "生成会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_5ef5228f0846",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "会议纪要已生成：`智能体项目管理工具会议纪要.docx`\n\n文档采用 modern 主题、A4 排版，包含键值表、状态卡、表格、列表等构件，共 6 个一级标题、9 个二级标题、4 个列表和 3 个表格。\n\n**主要内容摘要**：\n\n| 议题 | 结论 |\n|------|------|\n| 系统成熟度 | 基本可用，意图识别和上下文管理需继续优化 |\n| 自举计划 | 用当前项目自身作为演示案例 |\n| 飞书集成 | 由陈威负责对接 |\n| 文档关联机制 | 强/中/弱三级关联，变更触发联动修改 |\n| 存储方案 | 中间文件本地、最终结果云端、上下文服务端 |\n| 核心风险 | 多智能体 Token 消耗需监控 |\n\n待办事项 5 项，负责人和期限未明确处均标注\"未指明\"。未决问题 3 项：文档分级粒度、降级策略、上线时间均待细化。原文中说话人以\"说话人1-8\"编号保留，附注已说明。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_5ef5228f0846",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T13:57:26.612872421Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T14:00:04.441619463Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 463801,
+              "completionTokens": 8286,
+              "totalTokens": 472087,
+              "durationMs": 157828,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 20,
+            "toolFailures": 6,
+            "fullRegens": 3,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "最终 lint 检查（#16）返回空数组 []，无 error；outline（#17）显示文档结构完整，含6个一级标题、9个二级标题、4个列表、3个表格；工件清单确认 art_a5c1f91919a4 已登记（41731 字节）。虽然早期 lint（#8）报告过两个 empty-section 错误，但根据「后一次检查覆盖前一次」规则，以 #16 为准。内置质量检查已通过。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "智能体项目管理工具会议纪要.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 159165
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 20,
+        "toolFailures": 6,
+        "fullRegens": 3,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 0,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 1
+      },
+      "unverifiedFacts": [
+        "10月9日"
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+}

.task/phase01-eval/before-main-1ebd46e.json

@@ -0,0 +1,334 @@
+{
+  "target": "http://127.0.0.1:18812",
+  "generatedAt": "2026-10-09T12:41:41Z",
+  "tasks": [
+    {
+      "id": "minutes-basic",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "帮我总结一份会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_434c4e2f0316",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "会议纪要已生成并交付：**研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审会议纪要.docx**\n\n文档包含 46 个段落和 3 个表格，内容完整。\n\n不过当前版本未能通过可读性检查——主要问题是标题采用了\"栏目式\"排版，影响了阅读体验。建议将标题改为普通正文格式后重新提交，分数即可达标。\n\n如果需要我直接修改版式，请告知。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_434c4e2f0316",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T12:41:41.055159968Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T12:44:11.350478134Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 506289,
+              "completionTokens": 7674,
+              "totalTokens": 513963,
+              "durationMs": 150294,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 14,
+            "toolFailures": 3,
+            "fullRegens": 2,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 11,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 4
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审会议纪要.docx：可读性：使用了栏目式标题；总分 65，低于 70"
+            },
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审会议纪要.docx：可读性：使用了栏目式标题；总分 65，低于 70"
+            },
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审会议纪要.docx：可读性：使用了栏目式标题；总分 65，低于 70"
+            },
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审会议纪要.docx：可读性：使用了栏目式标题；总分 65，低于 70"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审会议纪要.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 153167
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 14,
+        "toolFailures": 3,
+        "fullRegens": 2,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 11,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 4
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "plan-followup",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "帮我总结一份会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_0346b6627a08",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "会议纪要已生成并交付。\n\n**文件**：meeting-rd-agent-asr.docx\n\n**核心结论**：\n\n1. 设计理念须重构：从\"上传+输出混用\"改为\"记忆系统\"模式（先打标签入库，再谈更新输出），引入渐进式清晰（Baseline概念）\n2. 暂停代码，优先完成需求：产品需求文档仍为0.0.5版，要求完成V1.0再动代码\n3. 自举优先：用智能体先管好自己的研发文档\n4. 每周代码Review：解决AI生成代码规模失控问题\n\n**还支持其他视图**：\n\n| 视图 | 适用场景 |\n|------|---------|\n| 智能笔记（按时间线） | 回查每句发言，逐字还原讨论过程 |\n| 一页纸版本 | 只需快速了解5个决议和6个待办 |\n\n需要哪种视图请告诉我。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_0346b6627a08",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T12:44:14.259261438Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T12:49:33.896202727Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 851748,
+              "completionTokens": 22796,
+              "totalTokens": 874544,
+              "durationMs": 319636,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 21,
+            "toolFailures": 7,
+            "fullRegens": 5,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "终轮工具#15质量检查通过（空数组），#16结构验证显示完整内容（5个一级标题、决议列表5项、待办事项、附录含3个表格），#18确认文件存在，#21确认art_5323d2d5dfc2登记成功。内置质量检查明确声明已通过，且规则要求不以后来的通过状态推翻更早的错误记录。以最后一次证据为准，文件已生成并交付。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "meeting-rd-agent-asr.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 321335
+        },
+        {
+          "user": "根据这个纪要，制定一个方案",
+          "runId": "run_34165b5cfd79",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "已制定方案并生成文档：**研发智能体文档处理与自举方案.docx**\n\n**核心内容**：\n\n| 模块 | 要点 |\n|------|------|\n| **架构** | 四层结构（存储层→标签层→检索层→应用层），引入Baseline快照机制 |\n| **三阶段** | 需求锁定(1-2周) → 核心架构实现(3-5周) → 自举与质量管控(6-8周) |\n| **关键决策** | 暂停代码开发，需求V1.0冻结后再启动；每周代码Review；用智能体管理自身文档 |\n| **风险应对** | 3项主要风险各有对策：需求冻结延迟、存储开销、检索精度 |\n\n**还支持其他视图**：\n\n| 视图 | 适用场景 |\n|------|---------|\n| 评审要点 | 准备方案评审会议，聚焦争议点和决策项 |\n| 一页纸 | 快速向领导汇报，5句话说明方案全貌 |\n\n需要哪种视图请告诉我。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_34165b5cfd79",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T12:49:35.588172612Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T12:51:16.84743871Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 124696,
+              "completionTokens": 4866,
+              "totalTokens": 129562,
+              "durationMs": 101258,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 9,
+            "toolFailures": 3,
+            "fullRegens": 2,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "工件已生成并登记（art_4f5d2942e2f0，40951字节），内容包含完整结构（一级标题5节、层级标题、列表、项目符号、7张表格），内置质量检查已通过。虽然工具#2和#5曾出现异常，但工具#7的lint已清零，工具#8确认文档结构完整，后续工具#9成功登记。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 102182
+        },
+        {
+          "user": "方案太简要了，给我一个详细的方案和计划",
+          "runId": "run_5d569249a735",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "已为你生成详细方案文档：\n\n**研发智能体文档处理与自举详细方案与执行计划.docx**\n\n文档包含以下内容框架：\n\n1. **项目背景与问题分析** — 当前文档处理痛点、智能体能力现状\n2. **详细方案设计** — 文档处理流程、任务拆解、自举机制设计\n3. **技术架构** — 系统模块划分、接口设计、数据流\n4. **执行计划** — 阶段划分、里程碑、时间线\n5. **风险评估与应对** — 潜在风险点、缓解措施\n6. **验收标准** — 功能指标、性能指标\n\n文件已可直接下载。如需调整文档深度（如增加技术细节、案例说明）、补充时间表具体日期、或修改章节结构，请告知。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_5d569249a735",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T12:51:17.769771496Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T12:55:14.574902887Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 226948,
+              "completionTokens": 14832,
+              "totalTokens": 241780,
+              "durationMs": 236804,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 9,
+            "toolFailures": 3,
+            "fullRegens": 2,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 2
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "回复正文里出现了工具调用标记，但本轮没有真实的工具调用"
+            },
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "工件已生成并登记成功。详细方案文档 art_4744a3d22493（50968字节）存在于工作区。内置质量检查已通过（docx 版式评分通过）。虽然 #2 lint 检查发现空章节错误，但 #4 重新检查结果为空列表，且内置质量检查明确优先于更早的 lint 输出。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "研发智能体文档处理与自举详细方案与执行计划.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 237373
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 39,
+        "toolFailures": 13,
+        "fullRegens": 9,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 0,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 4
+      },
+      "unverifiedFacts": [
+        "20%",
+        "95%",
+        "80%",
+        "85%",
+        "100%",
+        "150%",
+        "60%"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "qa-citation",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "这次会议最主要的事情是什么",
+          "runId": "run_a0ec745e0c77",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "## 会议总结\n\n本次会议最主要的事情：**负责人（说话人2）叫停了当前的产品开发，要求团队先停下来写好自己产品的用户需求文档。**\n\n核心问题：产品设计理念有根本性偏差——当前做法是\"上传文档→直接生成目标文档\"，而正确的做法应该是\"上传文档→识别分类、打标签、入知识库→后续按需生成\"。\n\n### 关键分歧\n\n| 现在的问题 | 期望的方案 |\n|---|---|\n| 上传后直接让AI写文档 | 先阅读文档、打标签、入知识库 |\n| 一次性生成完整文档 | 渐进式：读一段→总结一段→与用户确认一段→继续 |\n| 把记忆系统和内容输出混在一起 | 严格分离：先建立记忆，后触发输出 |\n| 商务对接阶段不能生成立项文档 | 文档触发应该是内容相关，而非阶段限制 |\n\n### 决策\n\n- **下午停止写代码**，先用自己的智能体把自己的用户需求文档写出来（市场可行性、注册可行性、技术可行性等模块的梳理）\n- 把飞书智能助手加到测试群，用自己的产品管理自己的项目\n- 每周固定时间做代码 review\n\n\u003e \"你先把代码停了，先把自己的需求文档写出来。你先能写出来，你们下午就干这一件事。不要写代码。\" —— 说话人2",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_a0ec745e0c77",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T12:55:15.180075488Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T12:55:38.994927017Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 21813,
+              "completionTokens": 761,
+              "totalTokens": 22574,
+              "durationMs": 23814,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 0,
+            "toolFailures": 0,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "用户要求回答会议最主要的事情，终轮回复已明确指出：负责人叫停开发，要求团队先写用户需求文档。回复包含核心问题、关键分歧对比表、决策事项和直接引用，内容完整充分。无工具调用和工件生成需求，内置质量检查已通过。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 24039
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 0,
+        "toolFailures": 0,
+        "fullRegens": 0,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 0,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 1
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "minutes-pm-tool",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "生成会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_5adff16442a1",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "已生成会议纪要：**智能体项目管理工具演示与结题报告推进会议纪要.docx**\n\n文档包含以下内容：\n- 会议概述\n- 项目验收状态\n- 文档版本管理现状\n- 后续工作安排\n\n文档已登记，可点击上方文件卡片预览。\n\n**需要改进的问题：** 自动评估提示\"使用了栏目式标题\"，总分65分低于70分的标准，可能影响可读性。\n\n**可调整方向：**\n- 将栏目式标题改为标准段落标题\n- 增加各章节的详细内容说明\n- 补充会议讨论的具体结论和行动项\n\n如果需要针对上述问题进行修改，请告知。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_5adff16442a1",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T12:55:39.240667264Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T12:58:24.81017724Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 635885,
+              "completionTokens": 8802,
+              "totalTokens": 644687,
+              "durationMs": 165568,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 20,
+            "toolFailures": 5,
+            "fullRegens": 3,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 4
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "智能体项目管理工具演示与结题报告推进会议纪要.docx：可读性：使用了栏目式标题；总分 65，低于 70"
+            },
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "智能体项目管理工具演示与结题报告推进会议纪要.docx：可读性：使用了栏目式标题；总分 65，低于 70；智能体项目管理工具演示与结题报告推进会议纪要.docx：可读性：使用了栏目式标题；总分 65，低于 70"
+            },
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "智能体项目管理工具演示与结题报告推进会议纪要.docx：可读性：使用了栏目式标题；总分 65，低于 70；智能体项目管理工具演示与结题报告推进会议纪要.docx：可读性：使用了栏目式标题；总分 65，低于 70"
+            },
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "智能体项目管理工具演示与结题报告推进会议纪要.docx：可读性：使用了栏目式标题；总分 65，低于 70；智能体项目管理工具演示与结题报告推进会议纪要.docx：可读性：使用了栏目式标题；总分 65，低于 70"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "智能体项目管理工具演示与结题报告推进会议纪要.docx",
+            "智能体项目管理工具演示与结题报告推进会议纪要.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 168176
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 20,
+        "toolFailures": 5,
+        "fullRegens": 3,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 0,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 4
+      },
+      "unverifiedFacts": [
+        "10月9日"
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+}

.task/phase02-eval/after-p2i1-908fb25.json

@@ -0,0 +1,323 @@
+{
+  "target": "http://127.0.0.1:18814",
+  "model": "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed",
+  "generatedAt": "2026-10-09T14:36:19Z",
+  "tasks": [
+    {
+      "id": "minutes-basic",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "帮我总结一份会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_9e73326b54ac",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "会议纪要已生成完毕。\n\n**研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审会议纪要.docx** 包含以下内容：\n\n- **核心结论**：当前产品设计未实现\"渐进式清晰\"理念，会议决议暂停代码开发，优先完成用户需求文档\n- **三大设计缺陷**：缺失意图识别与标签体系、记忆系统与输出内容混杂、渐进式更新未实现\n- **后续行动**：陈磊负责当天下午完成用户需求文档1.0版，同步推进自举工作，建立每周代码 review 机制\n- **未决事项**：PPT 解析功能异常、工作流划分待确认、ISO 9001 需求定义未完成\n\n文件已可直接下载使用。如需调整文档格式、补充具体内容或重新划分章节结构，请告诉我。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_9e73326b54ac",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T14:36:19.503499234Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T14:39:46.156714216Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 590186,
+              "completionTokens": 15627,
+              "totalTokens": 605813,
+              "durationMs": 206652,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 17,
+            "toolFailures": 5,
+            "fullRegens": 4,
+            "apiDiscovery": 3,
+            "readsOriginal": 12,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "最终lint检查（#15）exit=0，错误数组为空。工件已登记（art_288fbd52a08f，42199字节）。内容结构完整，包含所有章节标题、项目符号和3个表格。内置质量检查通过：文件存在且非空，版式与内容评分已通过。以最后一次工具输出为准。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审会议纪要.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 207231
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 17,
+        "toolFailures": 5,
+        "fullRegens": 4,
+        "apiDiscovery": 3,
+        "readsOriginal": 12,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 1
+      },
+      "unverifiedFacts": [
+        "10月9日"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "plan-followup",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "帮我总结一份会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_6cda394a1eee",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "会议纪要已生成完成。\n\n**交付物**：研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审会议纪要.docx\n\n**核心要点**：\n\n1. **产品设计问题**：当前系统缺少“渐进式清晰”设计——上传文档后直接全量分析，而不是先建立记忆系统、打标签分类\n2. **改进方向**：上传文档应是建立记忆系统的过程——先判断相关性、拆分内容、打标签入知识库，后续触发时再更新\n3. **待办事项**：下午停止代码开发，优先完成智能体需求文档；将飞书智能助手加入测试群；建立每周代码 review 制度\n\n如需生成智能笔记（按时间线回溯发言记录），请告知。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_6cda394a1eee",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T14:39:46.755953345Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T14:41:24.662917125Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 330027,
+              "completionTokens": 5748,
+              "totalTokens": 335775,
+              "durationMs": 97906,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 11,
+            "toolFailures": 1,
+            "fullRegens": 1,
+            "apiDiscovery": 4,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "工件清单包含 art_ca1f84fe2909（研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审会议纪要.docx，41828字节）。内置质量检查已确认文件存在且非空。#9质量检查的路径错误被#10的ls结果覆盖（文件确实存在于正确路径）。#8的docx内容提取显示了完整的会议纪要结构（包含决议、待办事项、未决问题等章节）。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审会议纪要.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 99121
+        },
+        {
+          "user": "根据这个纪要，制定一个方案",
+          "runId": "run_d0c10b249931",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "已根据会议纪要制定方案并生成文档。\n\n**交付物**：《研发智能体文档处理与自举方案.docx》\n\n**核心结论**：\n\n- **推荐方案C（混合方案）**：保留快路径满足简单场景，同时建设渐进式记忆系统\n- **核心理念**：上传文档是建立记忆系统的过程，记忆与输出必须分离\n- **实施周期**：3-4周，分三阶段推进\n\n文档包含完整方案内容：整体架构、核心处理流程、标签体系、知识库网状结构、实施计划、风险与应对、立即行动项等章节。\n\n**如需调整**：\n\n- 增加具体时间节点或责任人分配 → 可补充到表格中\n- 补充技术细节或代码架构图 → 可扩展相关章节\n- 调整章节顺序或详略程度 → 可重新组织文档结构\n\n请告知需要的调整方向。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_d0c10b249931",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T14:41:25.871402352Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T14:45:32.422425413Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 614578,
+              "completionTokens": 18715,
+              "totalTokens": 633293,
+              "durationMs": 246550,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 23,
+            "toolFailures": 7,
+            "fullRegens": 7,
+            "apiDiscovery": 1,
+            "readsOriginal": 3,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 2
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案.docx：证据：没有出处；版式 empty-section：标题下没有内容；版式 empty-section：标题下没有内容"
+            },
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "文档\"研发智能体文档处理与自举方案.docx\"(art_22f08bef6b20, 42544字节)已成功生成，包含完整方案内容：整体架构、核心处理流程、标签体系、知识库网状结构、实施计划、风险与应对、立即行动项等章节，以及7个表格。最新lint检查(#22)返回空数组无错误，内置质量检查确认文件存在且非空、版式与内容评分已通过。方案核心结论(推荐方案C混合方案)与会议纪要内容对应，标注了对应时间戳。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案.docx",
+            "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 249309
+        },
+        {
+          "user": "方案太简要了，给我一个详细的方案和计划",
+          "runId": "run_904269c7c259",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "详细方案已生成完毕，文档已就绪。\n\n**交付物**：《研发智能体文档处理与自举方案（详细版）.docx》\n\n文档包含完整六章内容与十二张表格：\n\n- **一、项目背景与问题分析**：业务背景、五个现状问题、问题根因分析\n- **二、方案设计**：五条设计原则、三层架构（接入层→记忆层→输出层）、快/慢路径流程、标签体系、知识库网状结构\n- **三、技术实现方案**：技术选型表、知识单元与文档数据模型、五个核心接口设计\n- **四、实施计划**：四阶段划分、七个里程碑、四类资源估算（周期6周，2人开发）\n- **五、风险与应对**：四项风险识别与应对措施\n- **六、立即行动项**：四项会议决议行动项\n\n**关键结论**：\n- 推荐采用三层架构支撑文档处理与自举机制\n- 需立即启动：停止当前开发、完成需求文档、建立code review制度\n\n如需补充具体负责人姓名、调整时间节点、增加技术实现细节或评审要点，请告知。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_904269c7c259",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T14:45:35.182139248Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T14:48:22.314013689Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 147199,
+              "completionTokens": 12180,
+              "totalTokens": 159379,
+              "durationMs": 167131,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 8,
+            "toolFailures": 2,
+            "fullRegens": 3,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "工件已生成并登记（art_63f87465b617，45426字节）。内置质量检查确认文件存在且非空，版式与内容评分已通过。虽然#1有heading level错误、#3有empty-section警告，但#6的最新lint检查返回空数组（以最后一次为准），表明问题已修复。文档包含6章+12表格的完整结构，符合「详细方案」的交付要求。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案（详细版）.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 168336
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 42,
+        "toolFailures": 10,
+        "fullRegens": 11,
+        "apiDiscovery": 5,
+        "readsOriginal": 3,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 4
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "qa-citation",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "这次会议最主要的事情是什么",
+          "runId": "run_74bd672aee07",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "## 会议最主要的事情\n\n**产品设计理念被彻底否定，需重新确定方向。**\n\n说话人2（领导）明确指出当前文档上传功能的设计思路\"有问题\"，核心观点是：\n\n\u003e 上传文档应该是\"建立记忆系统\"的过程，而不是直接生成内容。\n\n**具体问题：**\n- 现在是\"一竿子捅到底\"——上传文档后直接生成文档\n- 应该分步走：先判断相关性 → 打标签 → 入库 → 后续触发更新时才填写内容\n- 文档处理应结合项目当前阶段（策划/设计/验证等），形成可追溯的网状结构\n\n**会议决策：**\n1. 下午暂停代码开发，先用自己的智能体把自己的需求文档写出来\n2. 把智能助手加到测试群里，让团队先用起来\n3. 后续再讨论如何把智能体融入开发流程\n\n**一句话总结：** 这次会议推翻了现有设计，要求团队\"自举\"——先把自己管起来，再做其他。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_74bd672aee07",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T14:48:23.622441027Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T14:48:43.387065536Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 21871,
+              "completionTokens": 532,
+              "totalTokens": 22403,
+              "durationMs": 19760,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 0,
+            "toolFailures": 0,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "用户问的是会议内容理解类问题，终轮回复已给出明确答案：产品设计理念被彻底否定，需重新确定方向，并详细说明了具体问题和决策。问答应已完成。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 21082
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 0,
+        "toolFailures": 0,
+        "fullRegens": 0,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 0,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 1
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "minutes-pm-tool",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "生成会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_cb07e464ca5e",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "会议纪要已生成完毕。\n\n**交付物**：`智能体项目管理工具演示与结题报告推进会议纪要.docx`\n\n文档结构包含 45 段落、2 个表格，内容涵盖：\n- 一、项目验收状态\n- 二、智能体工具演示与能力展示（自学习智能体框架、群组对话管理、智能研判流程等）\n- 三、结题报告推进计划\n- 四、后续工作安排\n\n文件已验证可正常读取，可直接打开使用。如需调整格式或补充内容，请告诉我。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_cb07e464ca5e",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T14:48:44.714838951Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T14:51:44.828224766Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 789695,
+              "completionTokens": 11059,
+              "totalTokens": 800754,
+              "durationMs": 180112,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 19,
+            "toolFailures": 2,
+            "fullRegens": 3,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 2,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 4
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "tool-run_shell-call_function_se2duxyqky77_1.txt：无法读取交付物：不是文本文件"
+            },
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "tool-run_shell-call_function_se2duxyqky77_1.txt：无法读取交付物：不是文本文件"
+            },
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "tool-run_shell-call_function_se2duxyqky77_1.txt：无法读取交付物：不是文本文件"
+            },
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "tool-run_shell-call_function_se2duxyqky77_1.txt：无法读取交付物：不是文本文件"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "智能体项目管理工具演示与结题报告推进会议纪要.docx",
+            "tool-run_shell-call_function_se2duxyqky77_1.txt"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 180189
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 19,
+        "toolFailures": 2,
+        "fullRegens": 3,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 2,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 4
+      },
+      "unverifiedFacts": [
+        "10月9日"
+      ],
+      "finalVsArtifact": [
+        "二、智能体工具演示与能力展示（自学习智能体框架、群组",
+        "三、结题报告推进计划",
+        "四、后续工作安排"
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+}

.task/phase02-eval/after-p2i1-pmtool-1167927.json

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+{
+  "target": "http://127.0.0.1:18814",
+  "model": "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed",
+  "generatedAt": "2026-10-09T14:57:07Z",
+  "tasks": [
+    {
+      "id": "minutes-pm-tool",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "生成会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_4a0f39e58477",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "**生成完成，但质量验证未通过**\n\n已生成文件：智能体项目管理工具会议纪要.docx\n\n**问题说明：**\n\n质量审查工具无法读取文件——文件实际保存在子目录 `local/cnv_c795e702d1d3/` 下，但审查工具期望在 `workspaces/` 目录下查找。需要将文件移动或复制到正确路径后才能完成验证。\n\n**可调整的方向：**\n\n- 将 docx 文件复制到 `/home/weichen/.../workspaces/` 根目录，使质量审查工具能找到\n- 根据质量报告（得分 81）补充视觉摘要（状态卡、流程图或时间线），消除现有的 visual-summary 警告",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_4a0f39e58477",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T14:57:07.750198488Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T14:59:58.036810182Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 522703,
+              "completionTokens": 10271,
+              "totalTokens": 532974,
+              "durationMs": 170285,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 16,
+            "toolFailures": 5,
+            "fullRegens": 5,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 2
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "质量审查工具（#12）报告无法读取交付物文件：路径 /home/weichen/projects/.../workspaces/智能体项目管理工具会议纪要.docx 不存在。虽然工具#13确认文件实际存在于 /home/weichen/projects/.../workspaces/local/cnv_c795e702d1d3/ 下，工具#14也成功登记了交付物，但质量审查这一关未通过。需要确保文件放在质量审查工具期望的正确路径下，或质量审查能找到实际文件位置。。下一步：将生成的 docx 文件移动或复制到质量审查工具查找的路径 /home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-agent-quality-phase02/runtime/qa3/data/workspaces/ 下，使质量审查能正确读取文件并通过。或者确认质量审查工具的工作目录配置是否正确。"
+            },
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "验证器返回无法解析"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "智能体项目管理工具会议纪要.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 171190
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 16,
+        "toolFailures": 5,
+        "fullRegens": 5,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 0,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 2
+      }
+    }
+  ]
+}

.task/phase02-eval/after-p2i2-4675a25.json

@@ -0,0 +1,316 @@
+{
+  "target": "http://127.0.0.1:18814",
+  "model": "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed",
+  "generatedAt": "2026-10-09T15:57:48Z",
+  "tasks": [
+    {
+      "id": "minutes-basic",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "帮我总结一份会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_60d1a838f64f",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "会议纪要已生成并可下载：\n\n**研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审纪要.docx**\n\n---\n\n**核心结论：**\n\n会议围绕文档上传后的处理逻辑产生重大分歧。说话人2 认为当前设计\"一竿子捅到底\"，未实现渐进式清晰理念；正确做法应分三步走：①判断文档与项目相关性 → ②拆分打标签形成记忆系统 → ③按需抽取、渐进确认后生成，冲突时触发变更流程。\n\n**关键行动：**\n说话人2 要求暂停代码开发，先输出用户需求文档（1.0版），需覆盖市场可行性、技术可行性、注册可行性等模块。\n\n**待办事项：** 共5项，包括停止开发写需求文档、建立每周code review机制、将飞书智能助手加入测试群等。\n\n---\n\n**文档结构：** 会议信息键值表 → 按议题分节正文 → 核心分歧流程图 → 待办事项表格\n\n如需调整结构或补充内容，告诉我即可。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_60d1a838f64f",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T15:57:48.126892774Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T16:00:42.792167008Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 412549,
+              "completionTokens": 12865,
+              "totalTokens": 425414,
+              "durationMs": 174664,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 15,
+            "toolFailures": 5,
+            "fullRegens": 4,
+            "apiDiscovery": 1,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "lint检查(#14)返回空数组无error，文件已登记(#15)，内置质量检查通过。工件清单中有art_3f50be5d28c5对应的文件，证据链完整。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审纪要.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 177202
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 15,
+        "toolFailures": 5,
+        "fullRegens": 4,
+        "apiDiscovery": 1,
+        "readsOriginal": 0,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 1
+      },
+      "unverifiedFacts": [
+        "10月9日"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "plan-followup",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "帮我总结一份会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_b995d68b87ab",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "会议纪要已生成：**研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审会议纪要.docx**\n\n**核心结论**：本次会议围绕文档处理流程重构与智能体自举优先级展开。主要决定暂停当前代码开发，改为先完成1.0版用户需求文档；文档上传处理需从现有流程改为\"先判断相关性→打标签入库→再生成文档\"；智能体自举为最高优先级；同时建立每周 code review 机制控制代码架构。\n\n**待办事项**（5项）：\n1. 撰写智能体文档处理功能1.0版用户需求文档\n2. 将智能助手接入测试群\n3. 建立每周 code review 机制\n4. 暂停代码开发，优先完成需求文档\n5. 优化文档上传处理流程，实现标签分类和渐进式更新\n\n**文档样式**：modern 主题、微软雅黑字体、主色深蓝、A4页面、含视觉摘要（状态卡）。\n\n文件已可预览，点击卡片即可查看。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_b995d68b87ab",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T16:00:45.500096392Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T16:03:34.047491372Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 334925,
+              "completionTokens": 10348,
+              "totalTokens": 345273,
+              "durationMs": 168533,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 12,
+            "toolFailures": 4,
+            "fullRegens": 4,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "终轮回复声称生成的文件已由 #12 register_artifact 成功登记。最新 lint 检查（#11）exit=0 且输出空数组 `[]`，表示无任何 error。内置质量检查确认文件存在且非空、版式与内容评分已通过。以最后一次检查为准，不以早期 lint 报错（第5、8次运行）否定终态结果。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审会议纪要.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 171287
+        },
+        {
+          "user": "根据这个纪要，制定一个方案",
+          "runId": "run_1ab7282accf6",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "已为您生成方案文档：\n\n**研发智能体文档处理与自举方案.docx**\n\n---\n\n**核心方案要点：**\n\n1. **问题识别**：文档上传后直接进入生成环节，跳过意图识别和标签分类\n\n2. **三步走流程**：\n   - 第一步：意图识别（分类为新增/修改/查询）\n   - 第二步：标签分类（按模块/功能打标）\n   - 第三步：路由分发（进入对应处理管道）\n\n3. **自举路径**：\n   - 阶段一：基础能力建设（意图识别模型 + 标签体系）\n   - 阶段二：规则引擎接入\n   - 阶段三：LLM辅助决策\n   - 阶段四：全自动化\n\n4. **实施计划**：分阶段推进，每个阶段有明确交付物和验收标准\n\n---\n\n文档包含完整的系统架构、详细设计、交互流程、实施计划和风险提示。如需调整方案粒度或增加特定模块，可进一步说明。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_1ab7282accf6",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T16:03:36.756830813Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T16:06:01.707575137Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 543102,
+              "completionTokens": 7779,
+              "totalTokens": 550881,
+              "durationMs": 144950,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 12,
+            "toolFailures": 2,
+            "fullRegens": 3,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 3
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案.docx：证据：没有出处"
+            },
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案.docx：证据：没有出处"
+            },
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "文件 art_19d3a820141e 研发智能体文档处理与自举方案.docx 已生成并成功登记（41965字节）。内置质量检查确认：文件存在且非空，文本类工件的版式与内容评分已通过。终轮回复确认增加了出处引用，文档内容包含完整的方案结构（系统架构、详细设计、交互流程、自举路径、实施计划、风险与注意事项、成功标准），符合用户「根据会议纪要制定方案」的要求。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案.docx",
+            "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 147186
+        },
+        {
+          "user": "方案太简要了，给我一个详细的方案和计划",
+          "runId": "run_65dc5e8782ef",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "已生成《研发智能体文档处理与自举方案详细版》，包含9个章节完整内容，涵盖问题分析、需求分析、总体设计、详细技术设计（含标签体系、记忆系统架构、意图识别、小队角色、交互流程）、5阶段自举路径、12周6个里程碑计划、资源需求、风险应对及成功验收标准。\n\n**核心内容：**\n\n- **总体架构**：六层系统设计 + 三步走流程（自举启动→渐进清晰→自主运转）\n- **关键技术点**：标签体系三层架构、记忆系统三层设计（碎片/结构/专家）、意图识别三层模型、小队角色分工\n- **实施计划**：12周分6个里程碑推进（M1需求确认→M2标签系统→M3记忆系统→M4渐进填充→M5自举验证→M6方案固化）\n- **本周立即行动项**：明确P0优先级任务\n\n如需调整，可修改里程碑节奏、增减章节内容，或切换文档格式（如转PDF/PPT）。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_65dc5e8782ef",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T16:06:03.942040204Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T16:09:17.723105101Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 300277,
+              "completionTokens": 12786,
+              "totalTokens": 313063,
+              "durationMs": 193780,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 5,
+            "toolFailures": 1,
+            "fullRegens": 2,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "工件清单显示文件 art_893d5b82ec49 研发智能体文档处理与自举方案详细版.docx 已生成并登记。工具#2报告的4个empty-section错误已被工具#4（exit=0, 无错误输出[]）覆盖。内置质量检查明确表示文本类工件版式与内容评分已通过。根据'后一次检查覆盖前一次'和'内置质量检查已通过时不因更早error判失败'两条规则，以最新检查结果和内置质量检查为准。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案详细版.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 195299
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 29,
+        "toolFailures": 7,
+        "fullRegens": 9,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 0,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 5
+      },
+      "unverifiedFacts": [
+        "100%",
+        "99%",
+        "85%",
+        "10月09日"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "qa-citation",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "这次会议最主要的事情是什么",
+          "runId": "run_9b1b246647c3",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "## 会议要点\n\n根据会议纪要，**最核心的事情**是：\n\n### 产品设计理念被彻底否定，要求停下代码先做需求\n\n说话人2（领导）明确指出现有产品存在**根本性的设计理念问题**，最大的问题是：\n\n1. **没有实现\"渐进式清晰\"**——上传文档时没有先做意图识别、打标签、入知识库，而是直接一竿子捅到底要生成结果\n2. **记忆系统和输出系统混为一谈**——上传文档应该是建立记忆（打标签、分类、入库），而不是直接生成文档\n3. **架构失控**——产品经理自己都找不到代码在哪，团队找不着SQL，技术债务严重\n\n### 具体行动要求\n\n| 事项 | 要求 |\n|------|------|\n| 暂停开发 | 下午立即停止写代码 |\n| 优先做需求 | 先用自己的系统把自己的用户需求文档写出来（市场可行性、风险可行性报告等第一版） |\n| 自举 | 先用智能体管好自己的项目，再去管别人的 |\n| 加智能助手 | 把智能助手加到测试群里，让全员参与测试 |\n| 代码审查 | 每周必须和陈威、秦明一起review代码 |\n\n### 核心观点\n\n\u003e \"你先建立好你的用户需求。然后形成那个设计输入，然后找我确认，先把这步做了。\"\n\n\u003e \"你们应该自举，把这个事情自举了，这自举这事做了吗？——还没做。自己都没给自己做，自己天天在开发些什么呢？\"\n\n这是一次方向性的纠偏会议，从\"先开发再补需求\"转向\"先想清楚做什么\"。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_9b1b246647c3",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T16:09:19.279209145Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T16:09:49.176415757Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 21871,
+              "completionTokens": 775,
+              "totalTokens": 22646,
+              "durationMs": 29896,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 0,
+            "toolFailures": 0,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "终轮回复直接回答了用户问题'这次会议最主要的事情是什么'，内容为完整的文本分析，无文件生成需求，无工具调用。用户问题已被解答。内置质量检查通过。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 30038
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 0,
+        "toolFailures": 0,
+        "fullRegens": 0,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 0,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 1
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "minutes-pm-tool",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "生成会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_110087aa7774",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "会议纪要已生成：**智能体项目管理工具演示与结题报告推进会议纪要.docx**\n\n文档结构：7节，含1个流程图视觉摘要、3张表格（未决问题、待办事项、会议信息）。覆盖项目验收达成、智能体自学习与意图识别能力、文档管理体系、医疗器械风险识别、智能体部署方案、分歧共识（分级权限）以及6项待办事项。\n\n如需生成智能笔记（逐句回查）或执行摘要（一页纸版本），请告知。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_110087aa7774",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T16:09:49.33921491Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T16:12:29.191828156Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 318926,
+              "completionTokens": 6448,
+              "totalTokens": 325374,
+              "durationMs": 159852,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 12,
+            "toolFailures": 1,
+            "fullRegens": 2,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 1,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "#7 的 3 个 empty-section 错误在 #9 修复后，#10 lint 重检返回空数组 `[]` exit=0（无 error）；#11 outline 确认修复后的文档含 7 节、3 表，结构完整；#12 已登记工件 72496 字节。根据「内置质量检查已通过时不要因更早的 error 就判失败」，以最新 lint 结果为准。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "智能体项目管理工具演示与结题报告推进会议纪要.docx",
+            "tool-run_shell-call_function_ew464gzhar6p_1.txt"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 162164
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 12,
+        "toolFailures": 1,
+        "fullRegens": 2,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 1,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 1
+      },
+      "unverifiedFacts": [
+        "10月9日"
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+}

.task/phase03-eval/after-p3.json

@@ -0,0 +1,319 @@
+{
+  "target": "http://127.0.0.1:18815",
+  "model": "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed",
+  "generatedAt": "2026-10-09T18:04:29Z",
+  "tasks": [
+    {
+      "id": "minutes-basic",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "帮我总结一份会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_e72090903964",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "会议纪要已生成完毕。\n\n**文件**：`会议纪要_研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审.docx`\n\n### 要点\n\n会议围绕**研发智能体文档处理与自举方案**展开，核心分歧在于\"记忆系统优先\"还是\"输出优先\"的设计理念。顾总指出了三个根本问题：\n\n| 问题 | 说明 |\n|------|------|\n| 记忆系统缺失 | 上传文档直接生成输出，跳过打标签、入库、构建记忆的核心流程 |\n| 渐进式清晰未实现 | 文档应分阶段填充（马头→马身→马腿），而非一次性生成完整文档 |\n| 自举未启动 | 产品需求版本仅0.0.5，远未达到1.0标准，天天写代码但产品方向未确认 |\n\n会议形成三项明确决议：\n\n1. **立即停止新功能开发**，下午完成用户需求文档1.0版，发飞书给顾总确认\n2. **建立每周代码Review机制**：与陈威、庆明定期Review，门过门才能继续\n3. **智能助手加入测试群**，推进自举，用智能体辅助开发本身\n\n### 还可以\n\n- **智能笔记（method.timeline）**：逐条按时间线还原会议讨论过程，供回查\n- **执行摘要**：一页纸版本，供快速传阅",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_e72090903964",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T18:04:29.651420747Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T18:07:46.476614924Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 387983,
+              "completionTokens": 8872,
+              "totalTokens": 396855,
+              "durationMs": 196824,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 12,
+            "toolFailures": 2,
+            "fullRegens": 2,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 2,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "文件已生成并注册（#6 文件存在，#12 register_artifact ok）。#10 lint exit=0 且输出空数组 []，内置质量检查已通过。#7 的 empty-section 错误出现在 #9 修改文档之后，#10 重新 lint 已清除。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "会议纪要_研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 198219
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 12,
+        "toolFailures": 2,
+        "fullRegens": 2,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 2,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 1
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "plan-followup",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "帮我总结一份会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_b61fd9675f7a",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "会议纪要已完成。\n\n**交付物**：`会议纪要-研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审.docx`\n\n**核心结论**：\n\n| 议题 | 结论 |\n|------|------|\n| 文档上传处理 | 先识别→标签→入库，再渐进更新，而非直接生成 |\n| 产品设计理念 | 根本缺陷：未实现\"渐进式清晰\"，未围绕研发体系这张网设计 |\n| 代码架构 | 失控风险，AI代码超可控范围，需建立review机制 |\n| 自举需求 | 先管好自己（写需求文档），再对外服务 |\n\n**最高优先级行动**：停止写代码 → 梳理产品需求文档（1.0版）→ 输出设计输入文档\n\n如需调整格式或内容，可告诉我修改方向。或者可以生成**智能笔记**（按时间线还原讨论过程）或**一页纸版本**（仅保留核心结论和行动项）。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_b61fd9675f7a",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T18:07:47.903476106Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T18:10:32.844998615Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 351781,
+              "completionTokens": 9869,
+              "totalTokens": 361650,
+              "durationMs": 164940,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 10,
+            "toolFailures": 3,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 10,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "工件已生成并登记（art_8c584959fc76，42655字节）。最终 lint 检查通过（0 error），仅有一个关于视觉摘要的 warning（非 error）。内置质量检查确认文件存在且非空、版式与内容评分通过。用户要求的会议纪要已完成。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "会议纪要-研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 165182
+        },
+        {
+          "user": "根据这个纪要，制定一个方案",
+          "runId": "run_4cbdf669862a",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "## 方案已生成\n\n根据纪要内容，制定了《研发智能体文档处理与自举方案》，包含以下主要内容：\n\n**核心模块：**\n- **背景与目标**：分析当前文档处理的问题，明确渐进式清晰和研发体协作两大目标\n- **文档处理方案**：基于增量解析的渐进式理解、记忆库分层管理（短期→长期→知识图谱）\n- **标签体系**：doc_id、type、entity、relation等结构化字段描述文档特征\n- **研发体协作**：产品→设计→开发→测试的多角色分工与反馈闭环\n- **自举机制**：规则自举、标签自举、模式自举三个层次实现系统自我进化\n\n**交付物：**\n- 📄 研发智能体文档处理与自举方案.docx\n\n---\n\n⚠️ **本轮检查未通过**：第115行标题仍为栏目名\"标签体系以结构化格式描述文档特征\"，需要改成一句结论性判断。示例：`### 标签体系通过结构化格式精准描述文档特征`",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_4cbdf669862a",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T18:10:33.11418327Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T18:14:09.799117146Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 911117,
+              "completionTokens": 10681,
+              "totalTokens": 921798,
+              "durationMs": 216678,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 16,
+            "toolFailures": 1,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 16,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 4
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案.docx：可读性：第 115 行标题是栏目名，不是判断，改成一句结论"
+            },
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案.docx：可读性：第 115 行标题是栏目名，不是判断，改成一句结论"
+            },
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案.docx：可读性：第 115 行标题是栏目名，不是判断，改成一句结论"
+            },
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案.docx：可读性：第 115 行标题是栏目名，不是判断，改成一句结论"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 219335
+        },
+        {
+          "user": "方案太简要了，给我一个详细的方案和计划",
+          "runId": "run_00506b9f2b8c",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "**交付物**：`研发智能体文档处理与自举方案-详细版.docx`\n\n---\n\n## 文档概览\n\n文档共 **9个章节、54个表格、约1360行**，涵盖完整方案和实施计划。\n\n### 核心结构\n\n| 章节 | 主要内容 |\n|------|----------|\n| 1. 背景与目标 | 4个现状问题（文档处理倒置、理念缺失、架构失控、自举未启动）+ 总体目标 + 阶段目标 |\n| 2. 设计理念 | 渐进式清晰（3原则）+ 研发体系网状结构 + 记忆/输出解耦（3种解耦） |\n| 3. 文档处理流程重构 | 四步处理（相关性判断→拆解标签→切片入库→渐进更新）+ 标签体系 + 用户交互 |\n| 4. 产品需求文档框架 | 产品定位 + 10个功能需求（F1-F10）+ 6类非功能需求 |\n| 5. 技术架构设计 | 整体架构 + 5个核心数据实体 + API接口设计 + 代码管控规范 |\n| 6. 实施计划 | 三阶段10周（需求设计→开发实现→优化验收）+ 4个里程碑 |\n| 7. 风险与应对 | 8个风险的矩阵分析 + 详细应急预案 |\n| 8. 成功标准 | 产品/技术/用户三维度验收标准 |\n| 9. 后续工作 | 本周任务清单 + 待确认事项 |\n| 附录 | 术语表、参考文档、遗留问题清单 |\n\n---\n\n### 核心要点\n\n**核心理念**：自举优先——先完善自身的产品定义和管理流程，再向用户交付价值。\n\n**技术核心**：记忆系统与输出系统解耦\n- 记忆系统负责：识别→打标签→入库（先结构化存储）\n- 输出系统负责：从记忆库渐进生成（后按需输出）\n\n**实施路径**：三阶段10周\n1. 第1-2周：需求与设计\n2. 第3-6周：开发与实现\n3. 第7-10周：优化与验收\n\n---\n\n### 可调整方向\n\n如果需要侧重某一方面，可以告诉我：\n- **缩减规模**：可以精简到5-6章的核心版本\n- **强化某一章**：比如第5章技术架构可以拆成独立的技术设计文档\n- **增加示例**：在第3章流程中补充具体的输入输出示例\n- **调整粒度**：实施计划的周计划可以细化到每天的任务",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_00506b9f2b8c",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T18:14:12.41255715Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T18:21:56.444895967Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 6880651,
+              "completionTokens": 21951,
+              "totalTokens": 6902602,
+              "durationMs": 464031,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 91,
+            "toolFailures": 3,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 91,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "文档已生成并登记(art_c966f0bad8a2, 64899字节)。最新lint检查(#90)显示通过(0 error)，仅1个warning(缺少视觉摘要，非硬性错误)。内置质量检查确认文件存在且非空，版式与内容评分通过。文档包含9章节、54表格、约1360行，覆盖用户要求的详细方案和计划全部内容。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案-详细版.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 465749
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 117,
+        "toolFailures": 7,
+        "fullRegens": 0,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 117,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 6
+      },
+      "unverifiedFacts": [
+        "80%",
+        "60%",
+        "90%",
+        "85%",
+        "95%",
+        "32%",
+        "98%",
+        "99.5%",
+        "99.999%",
+        "75%",
+        "10%"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "qa-citation",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "这次会议最主要的事情是什么",
+          "runId": "run_abbc21a50fc9",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "## 会议主要内容\n\n这次会议是**研发智能体文档处理与自举方案的评审**，核心议题是对当前产品设计的深度反思与方向调整。\n\n---\n\n### 最主要的事情：产品设计理念被否定，要求重新梳理需求\n\n**背景**\n\n说话人2（领导）听完陈磊对上传文档处理功能的讲解后，明确指出当前设计存在根本性问题——产品没有与研发体系强挂钩，没有实现\"渐进式清晰\"的核心理念。\n\n**核心分歧**\n\n| 当前实现 | 领导期望 |\n|---|---|\n| 上传文档后直接生成摘要、提示缺什么信息 | 上传文档后先**打标签、入库**，形成记忆系统 |\n| 直接尝试生成目标文档 | 先识别文档属于哪个阶段（策划/设计/注册等），与现有体系匹配 |\n| 一竿子捅到底 | **分步交互**：先总结一段、确认一段，后台继续处理下一段 |\n\n**关键结论**\n\n1. **设计理念有问题**：没有站在设计开发流程里思考，上传文档应该是建立记忆的过程，而非直接输出内容\n\n2. **立即行动项（下午执行）**：\n   - 停下手头代码开发\n   - 先用智能体把自己的**用户需求文档**写出来\n   - 先把自己的项目管起来，再去管别人的项目\n\n3. **自举是核心**：先把研发体系自身用智能体管起来，形成最佳范式，再输出给客户\n\n---\n\n**为什么这是最主要的事**\n\n会议后半段几乎完全围绕\"产品设计理念\"展开，领导反复强调\"产品思路乱\"、\"没有深入业务\"、\"先自举再输出\"，并当场拍板暂停开发、先做需求梳理——这是对前期工作的根本性否定，也是后续工作的方向转折点。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_abbc21a50fc9",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T18:21:58.217352944Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T18:22:17.71052329Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 22737,
+              "completionTokens": 586,
+              "totalTokens": 23323,
+              "durationMs": 19492,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 0,
+            "toolFailures": 0,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "用户要求回答'这次会议最主要的事情是什么'，终轮回复明确指出最主要的事情是'产品设计理念被否定，要求重新梳理需求'，并提供了详细的背景、核心分歧、关键结论和原因说明。回复完整回答了用户问题，内容非空。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 21030
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 0,
+        "toolFailures": 0,
+        "fullRegens": 0,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 0,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 1
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "minutes-pm-tool",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "生成会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_34a368282c0a",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "会议纪要已生成完毕。\n\n**交付物**：`智能体项目管理工具会议纪要.docx`\n\n**纪要结构**：\n- 会议基本信息（时间/地点/主持人/记录人）\n- 结题报告写作任务分配\n- 项目验收状态确认\n- 智能体工具进展\n- 多智能体协作工作流三大原则\n- 应用场景扩展方向\n- 下一步工作安排（5项待办）\n- 未决问题（4项待确认）\n\n如需补充一页纸摘要或按时间线保留逐句发言的智能笔记，可在当前对话中告知。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_34a368282c0a",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T18:22:19.271752675Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T18:23:47.512929188Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 374070,
+              "completionTokens": 3618,
+              "totalTokens": 377688,
+              "durationMs": 88240,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 10,
+            "toolFailures": 1,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 1,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "终轮回复声称会议纪要已生成并登记。工件清单中有对应文件 art_0dac07040cfc 智能体项目管理工具会议纪要.docx（42375字节）。内置质量检查确认文本类工件版式与内容评分已通过。lint 输出显示 0 error，仅 1 warning（visual-summary——因会议纪要非长报告未强制要求），符合要求。register_artifact 已成功登记。用户要求已完成。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "智能体项目管理工具会议纪要.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 90099
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 10,
+        "toolFailures": 1,
+        "fullRegens": 0,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 1,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 1
+      }
+    }
+  ]
+}

.task/phase04-eval/after-p4.json

@@ -0,0 +1,306 @@
+{
+  "target": "http://127.0.0.1:18816",
+  "model": "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed",
+  "generatedAt": "2026-10-09T23:15:55Z",
+  "tasks": [
+    {
+      "id": "minutes-basic",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "帮我总结一份会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_0fa0e1c5a04f",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "---\n\n## 会议纪要已生成\n\n**文件名**：`研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审会议纪要.docx`  \n**样式**：modern 主题，A4 排版，含完整标题层级、页码和三张结构化表格\n\n### 核心结论\n\n| 主题 | 结论 |\n|------|------|\n| **产品设计理念** | 缺乏\"渐进式清晰\"机制，未将上传文档视为建立记忆系统的过程；未打标签、未与研发体系强挂钩 |\n| **技术架构** | 代码结构失控，skill 过多无法定位；需建立每周 code review 机制 |\n| **自举需求** | ISO 9001 需求定义尚未完成，当前版本仅 0.0.5 水平 |\n| **关键决议** | 停止代码开发 → 优先撰写用户需求文档 1.0 版 → 发飞书群确认 |\n\n### 紧急待办\n\n1. **陈磊、雨果**：立即停止代码开发，撰写用户需求 1.0 版\n2. **陈磊**：与陈威、庆明建立每周 code review 机制\n3. **雨果**：将智能助手加入测试群，推进开发范式优化\n\n\u003e 原文未明确的信息（主持人、地点、缺席人、部分说话人身份）已标注\"文档未明确\"。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_0fa0e1c5a04f",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T23:15:55.259055687Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T23:17:20.669786197Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 424309,
+              "completionTokens": 3881,
+              "totalTokens": 428190,
+              "durationMs": 85410,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 9,
+            "toolFailures": 2,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 1,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "终轮回复声称生成了 `研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审会议纪要.docx`，工件清单中确有对应文件 art_a81643be6f99（42136 字节）。最后两次 lint 检查（#7、#8）中均显示 'lint: 通过（0 error）'，仅余一条 visual-summary warning（不影响内容完整性）。内置质量检查确认文件存在且非空，格式评分已通过。核心结论、紧急待办、未决问题等摘要内容均已在回复中呈现。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审会议纪要.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 87094
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 9,
+        "toolFailures": 2,
+        "fullRegens": 0,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 1,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 1
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "plan-followup",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "帮我总结一份会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_84a58d63bc31",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "会议纪要已生成并登记。\n\n## 会议纪要摘要\n\n**主题**：研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审\n\n**核心结论**：\n\n1. **产品设计理念需重构**：当前最大问题是没有实现\"渐进式清晰\"——上传文档应先建立记忆系统，而非直接生成文档\n2. **自举优先**：暂停代码开发，先完成用户需求文档（当前版本0.0.5，需达到0.5以上）\n3. **待办事项**：4项待执行任务含暂停开发写需求、加测试群、建立code review机制等\n\n**文档结构**：6节正文 + 会议信息表 + 4个汇总表格 + 改进流程示意图\n\n**本轮使用的样式**：\n- 主题：modern（默认）\n- 无模板，未仿制\n- 包含视觉摘要（警告块状态卡 + 流程示意图）\n\n---\n\n**还可以生成的视图**：\n- **智能笔记**（method.timeline）：按时间/发言顺序逐条记录，用于回查原始讨论\n- **一页纸**：压缩版摘要，适合快速传阅\n\n请告诉我是需要生成上述视图，还是对当前纪要有其他调整。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_84a58d63bc31",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T23:17:22.379115996Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T23:19:50.418003583Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 710368,
+              "completionTokens": 8999,
+              "totalTokens": 719367,
+              "durationMs": 148038,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 19,
+            "toolFailures": 6,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 15,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "工件清单中有art_c72cf6f5bd1d（42633字节）的docx文件，lint检查通过（0 error），内置质量检查确认存在且非空、版式与内容评分通过。终轮回复所称的交付物与工件清单一致。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "会议纪要-研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 150144
+        },
+        {
+          "user": "根据这个纪要，制定一个方案",
+          "runId": "run_6f0bff6ce9c3",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "方案已生成并登记。\n\n## 方案摘要\n\n**文件名**：研发智能体自举方案.docx\n\n**三个差异化方案**：\n\n| 方案 | 开发周期 | 资源投入 | 风险 | 特点 |\n|------|----------|----------|------|------|\n| 激进重构 | 3-4个月 | 2-3人 | 中高 | 推翻重来，全新架构 |\n| **渐进改良** | 6个月以上 | 1-2人 | 中 | 逐步迭代，保持兼容 |\n| 最小验证 | 4-6周 | 1人 | 低 | 快速试错，MVP验证 |\n\n**推荐**：方案二（渐进改良方案）\n\n理由：\n1. 风险可控，不需要推翻重来\n2. 保持业务连续性\n3. 符合\"代码已有但架构失控\"的现状\n4. 第1个月就能产出可用的记忆系统功能\n\n**文档结构**：背景需求 → 三个方案（含思路、实施路径、风险与代价）→ 对比表 → 推荐方案 → 实施优先级（状态卡）→ 待办事项表\n\n---\n\n**还可以生成**：\n- **评审要点**：方案评审时需要关注的关键问题\n- **执行摘要**：一页纸版本，供决策层快速浏览\n\n请告诉我是需要生成上述视图，还是对当前方案有其他调整。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_6f0bff6ce9c3",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T23:19:52.519288495Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T23:21:05.821895644Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 549918,
+              "completionTokens": 3256,
+              "totalTokens": 553174,
+              "durationMs": 73302,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 11,
+            "toolFailures": 1,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 7,
+            "planUpdates": 4,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "文件已生成（art_8d84eb8931e4，42453字节），包含三个差异化方案、对比表、推荐方案（渐进改良）、实施优先级和待办事项。内置质量检查已通过（存在且非空、版式与内容评分通过），lint检查通过（0 error），剩余1条warning是关于缺少视觉摘要的格式建议，不影响核心功能。用户要求'制定一个方案'已完成。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "研发智能体自举方案.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 75094
+        },
+        {
+          "user": "方案太简要了，给我一个详细的方案和计划",
+          "runId": "run_47bd93a637e2",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "详细方案已生成并登记。\n\n## 方案摘要\n\n**文件名**：研发智能体自举详细方案.docx\n\n**文档规模**：50KB+，共8章22个表格\n\n**核心内容**：\n\n| 章节 | 内容 |\n|------|------|\n| 1. 背景与问题 | 现状问题分析、核心需求来源（会议纪要原文） |\n| 2. 设计理念 | 记忆系统优先、上传不等于生成、渐进式清晰、触发式更新 |\n| 3. 系统架构 | 四层架构（交互层→意图识别→记忆系统→文档生成）+ 7个模块 + 数据模型 |\n| 4. 功能模块详细设计 | 7个模块的详细设计，含处理流程、交互示例 |\n| 5. 实施计划 | 24周详细计划（4阶段）+ 资源需求表 |\n| 6. 风险与应对 | 5项主要风险 + 5项质量保障措施 |\n| 7. 成功指标 | 5项量化指标 + 4项质量指标 |\n| 8. 待办事项 | 10项待办，含负责人和期限 |\n\n**实施周期**：24周（约6个月）\n\n**文档结构**：含架构图、流程图、表格、代码示例\n\n---\n\n**还可以生成**：\n- **评审要点**：方案评审时需要关注的关键问题清单\n- **执行摘要**：一页纸版本，供决策层快速浏览\n\n请告诉我是需要生成上述视图，还是对当前方案有其他调整。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_47bd93a637e2",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T23:21:07.614897317Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T23:23:50.279898772Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 1124371,
+              "completionTokens": 8981,
+              "totalTokens": 1133352,
+              "durationMs": 162664,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 17,
+            "toolFailures": 2,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 13,
+            "planUpdates": 4,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "终轮回复声称生成了详细方案，工件清单确认 art_00be1e2ac59e 研发智能体自举详细方案.docx（50213字节）已登记。最新的 lint 检查结果（工具#14）显示 tables 22、lint: 通过（0 error），唯一的 warning 是 visual-summary（缺少视觉摘要），但这不影响文档完整性。内置质量检查确认文件存在且非空，版式与内容评分已通过。根据规则，文件已生成且质量检查通过，用户要求的详细方案已完成。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "研发智能体自举详细方案.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 165246
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 47,
+        "toolFailures": 9,
+        "fullRegens": 0,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 35,
+        "planUpdates": 8,
+        "verifierChecks": 3
+      },
+      "unverifiedFacts": [
+        "80%",
+        "60%",
+        "30%",
+        "0%",
+        "50%",
+        "100%",
+        "20%",
+        "10%",
+        "85%",
+        "20261008"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "qa-citation",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "这次会议最主要的事情是什么",
+          "runId": "run_e71860623cdd",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "## 会议总结\n\n**最主要的事：产品设计理念被彻底否定，要求暂停开发，先把用户需求写清楚**\n\n---\n\n### 核心问题\n\n说话人2（领导）对当前文档处理方案的评价是**\"设计思路混乱\"**、\"没有站在设计开发流程里思考\"：\n\n| 问题 | 现状 | 期望 |\n|------|------|------|\n| 上传文档后 | 直接做结构化梳理、提示缺什么信息 | **先打标签、进入记忆系统**，而不是一上来就生成文档 |\n| 定位 | 通用功能，与研发体系弱挂钩 | 必须**严格挂钩研发体系各阶段**（策划、设计、验证等） |\n| 流程 | \"一竿子捅到底\" | **渐进式清晰**：先识别文档类型→打标签→进入知识库→按需触发更新 |\n\n---\n\n### 关键决策\n\n\u003e **\"你先把手头所有的工作都停下来。先尝试着自己给自己建立一个很好的用户需求再说。\"**\n\n- **下午把代码停了**，先写用户需求文档（市场可行性、风险可行性报告等第一版）\n- **先自举**：用自己的智能体把自己的项目管起来，再去管别人的项目\n- 把智能助手加到测试群里，融入开发过程\n\n---\n\n### 为什么重要\n\n领导的核心逻辑是：这套系统的价值在于**项目多、范式可重复**，但前提是产品设计必须深入业务流、严格可追溯。目前的方案\"包了一层又一层\"，但**没有实现渐进式更新和记忆系统**，是产品理念问题而非代码问题。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_e71860623cdd",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T23:23:52.891980561Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T23:24:18.230582905Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 23148,
+              "completionTokens": 612,
+              "totalTokens": 23760,
+              "durationMs": 25338,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 0,
+            "toolFailures": 0,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "用户要求回答'这次会议最主要的事情是什么'，终轮回复直接给出了明确答案：'产品设计理念被彻底否定，要求暂停开发，先把用户需求写清楚'，并详细阐述了核心问题、关键决策和重要性。本轮无工具调用、无工件生成需求，纯文本回复已完整回答用户问题。内置质量检查通过。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 27033
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 0,
+        "toolFailures": 0,
+        "fullRegens": 0,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 0,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 1
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "minutes-pm-tool",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "生成会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_69a5f440b33f",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "会议纪要已生成并登记。\n\n**本次会议核心结论**\n\n| 议题 | 结论 |\n|------|------|\n| 结题报告 | 启动编写，无需第三方测试，以内部专家评审进行；陈瑞加入协助 |\n| 工作流设计 | 文档修改必须限定范围（单个/阶段/大阶段文件），强关联文档（BCD）同步修改，阶段评审后版本锁定 |\n| 飞书集成 | 小杨负责飞书对接，变更通知与待办通过飞书推送 |\n| 自举计划 | 以本项目首个自举测试，下周评审前上线 |\n\n**5项待办**（见纪要表格）：陈瑞加入写结题报告、小杨负责飞书对接、于博优化意图识别、小杨对接秦明统计Token、团队完成自举测试。\n\n**未决4项**：意图识别准确性、模板链接自动生成、版本控制策略、Token熔断机制。\n\n---\n\n**样式说明**：采用 modern 主题，标题层级连续，表格呈现结构化数据（会议信息、待办），引语均标注说话人及时间戳。说话人保留原文编号并在文末附身份推断说明。",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_69a5f440b33f",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-09T23:24:19.950993609Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-09T23:26:06.033560763Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 500189,
+              "completionTokens": 4823,
+              "totalTokens": 505012,
+              "durationMs": 106082,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 12,
+            "toolFailures": 0,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 1,
+            "planUpdates": 5,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": true,
+              "reason": "会议纪要已生成（md文件写入成功），转换为docx文档并通过质量检查（仅1个warning，无error），已登记为工件art_3d2bb84e9b7d。内容包含：核心结论表格、5项待办、4项未决问题、结构完整的H1标题层级及3张表格，符合要求。"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "智能体项目管理工具演示与结题报告推进_会议纪要.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 108121
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 12,
+        "toolFailures": 0,
+        "fullRegens": 0,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 1,
+        "planUpdates": 5,
+        "verifierChecks": 1
+      }
+    }
+  ]
+}

.task/phase05-eval/after-p5.json

@@ -0,0 +1,320 @@
+{
+  "target": "http://127.0.0.1:18817",
+  "model": "MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed",
+  "generatedAt": "2026-10-10T00:08:03Z",
+  "tasks": [
+    {
+      "id": "minutes-basic",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "帮我总结一份会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_98227b6da4f8",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "本轮未做同源模型验证（验证器未独立配置）；硬事实与事实核查已执行",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_98227b6da4f8",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-10T00:08:03.365884236Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-10T00:09:46.817340834Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 958971,
+              "completionTokens": 5805,
+              "totalTokens": 964776,
+              "durationMs": 103450,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 20,
+            "toolFailures": 2,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 1,
+            "planUpdates": 6,
+            "verifierChecks": 2
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "事实核查：交付物里以下数字/日期在本次材料中找不到出处：2026年、10月10日。逐条二选一：改成材料里能找到的数值，或删除/明确标注为推测或目标值（如“目标 85%”）。不要保留无法回溯的裸数字。"
+            },
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "验证器未配置独立轻量模型（当前与主模型相同），跳过同源验证"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审纪要.docx",
+            "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审纪要.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 105127
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 20,
+        "toolFailures": 2,
+        "fullRegens": 0,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 1,
+        "planUpdates": 6,
+        "verifierChecks": 2
+      },
+      "unverifiedFacts": [
+        "10月10日"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "plan-followup",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "帮我总结一份会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_0e2939910b9b",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "本轮未做同源模型验证（验证器未独立配置）；硬事实与事实核查已执行",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_0e2939910b9b",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-10T00:09:48.529064498Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-10T00:11:19.797414578Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 490283,
+              "completionTokens": 5397,
+              "totalTokens": 495680,
+              "durationMs": 91268,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 16,
+            "toolFailures": 4,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 1,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 5,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "验证器未配置独立轻量模型（当前与主模型相同），跳过同源验证"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "研发智能体文档处理与自举方案评审会议纪要.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 93112
+        },
+        {
+          "user": "根据这个纪要，制定一个方案",
+          "runId": "run_db60273d0c50",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "本轮未做同源模型验证（验证器未独立配置）；硬事实与事实核查已执行",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_db60273d0c50",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-10T00:11:21.632969359Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-10T00:12:41.942635887Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 527953,
+              "completionTokens": 4448,
+              "totalTokens": 532401,
+              "durationMs": 80309,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 12,
+            "toolFailures": 1,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 2,
+            "verifierChecks": 2
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "事实核查：交付物里以下数字/日期在本次材料中找不到出处：2026-10-10。逐条二选一：改成材料里能找到的数值，或删除/明确标注为推测或目标值（如“目标 85%”）。不要保留无法回溯的裸数字。"
+            },
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "验证器未配置独立轻量模型（当前与主模型相同），跳过同源验证"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "研发智能体文档处理系统重构方案.docx",
+            "研发智能体文档处理系统重构方案.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 81106
+        },
+        {
+          "user": "方案太简要了，给我一个详细的方案和计划",
+          "runId": "run_aa3daf21b2bc",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "本轮未做同源模型验证（验证器未独立配置）；硬事实与事实核查已执行",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_aa3daf21b2bc",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-10T00:12:42.741977532Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-10T00:16:13.009298846Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 2124640,
+              "completionTokens": 15096,
+              "totalTokens": 2139736,
+              "durationMs": 210267,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 30,
+            "toolFailures": 5,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 2,
+            "verifierChecks": 2
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "事实核查：交付物里以下数字/日期在本次材料中找不到出处：95%、80%、90%、85%、20%、70%。逐条二选一：改成材料里能找到的数值，或删除/明确标注为推测或目标值（如“目标 85%”）。不要保留无法回溯的裸数字。"
+            },
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "验证器未配置独立轻量模型（当前与主模型相同），跳过同源验证"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "研发智能体文档处理系统重构详细方案.docx",
+            "研发智能体文档处理系统重构详细方案.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 210280
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 58,
+        "toolFailures": 10,
+        "fullRegens": 0,
+        "apiDiscovery": 1,
+        "readsOriginal": 0,
+        "planUpdates": 9,
+        "verifierChecks": 5
+      },
+      "unverifiedFacts": [
+        "95%",
+        "80%",
+        "90%",
+        "85%",
+        "20%",
+        "70%"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "qa-citation",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "这次会议最主要的事情是什么",
+          "runId": "run_c23966341ee0",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "本轮未做同源模型验证（验证器未独立配置）；硬事实与事实核查已执行",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_c23966341ee0",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-10T00:16:13.059935626Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-10T00:16:29.456464692Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 23148,
+              "completionTokens": 728,
+              "totalTokens": 23876,
+              "durationMs": 16396,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 0,
+            "toolFailures": 0,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "验证器未配置独立轻量模型（当前与主模型相同），跳过同源验证"
+            }
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 18029
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 0,
+        "toolFailures": 0,
+        "fullRegens": 0,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 0,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 1
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "minutes-pm-tool",
+      "turns": [
+        {
+          "user": "生成会议纪要",
+          "runId": "run_e87920a123a3",
+          "status": "completed",
+          "finalText": "本轮未做同源模型验证（验证器未独立配置）；硬事实与事实核查已执行",
+          "usage": {
+            "id": "run_e87920a123a3",
+            "status": "completed",
+            "createdAt": "2026-10-10T00:16:31.112896348Z",
+            "endedAt": "2026-10-10T00:18:24.614591662Z",
+            "usage": {
+              "promptTokens": 647994,
+              "completionTokens": 7187,
+              "totalTokens": 655181,
+              "durationMs": 113501,
+              "toolCalls": 0
+            },
+            "error": null
+          },
+          "metrics": {
+            "toolCalls": 19,
+            "toolFailures": 7,
+            "fullRegens": 0,
+            "apiDiscovery": 0,
+            "readsOriginal": 0,
+            "planUpdates": 0,
+            "verifierChecks": 1
+          },
+          "checks": [
+            {
+              "passed": false,
+              "reason": "验证器未配置独立轻量模型（当前与主模型相同），跳过同源验证"
+            }
+          ],
+          "artifacts": [
+            "会议纪要-智能体项目管理工具演示与结题报告推进.docx"
+          ],
+          "durationMs": 114121
+        }
+      ],
+      "total": {
+        "toolCalls": 19,
+        "toolFailures": 7,
+        "fullRegens": 0,
+        "apiDiscovery": 0,
+        "readsOriginal": 0,
+        "planUpdates": 0,
+        "verifierChecks": 1
+      }
+    }
+  ]
+}

.task/reviews/goal-continuity-delivery.json

@@ -0,0 +1,308 @@
+{
+  "source": "SELF",
+  "kind": "Fixed-ref review applicability verification; no test execution or new code review",
+  "refs": {
+    "original_base": "b6974fa0d6fba0d28984fcfcb4418c541b83f915",
+    "original_review_head": "6b0fc8f386d467b955269b2c5557b85908e211fe",
+    "new_main_base": "878e0e7ceba3bb6b78c36c5113eacc846a7f017b",
+    "new_candidate_head": "6e078ed3d15da0eaee8d993ee74499951ed7e6bf"
+  },
+  "commands": [
+    {
+      "argv": [
+        "git",
+        "show",
+        "6b0fc8f386d467b955269b2c5557b85908e211fe:PROJECT.md"
+      ],
+      "exit_code": 0,
+      "stdout_sha256": "083ba30a5fb2aba60d0468f0afbda7897cb08e984abe39417c1d51568bc3beeb",
+      "stdout_bytes": 1720
+    },
+    {
+      "argv": [
+        "git",
+        "show",
+        "6e078ed3d15da0eaee8d993ee74499951ed7e6bf:PROJECT.md"
+      ],
+      "exit_code": 0,
+      "stdout_sha256": "083ba30a5fb2aba60d0468f0afbda7897cb08e984abe39417c1d51568bc3beeb",
+      "stdout_bytes": 1720
+    },
+    {
+      "argv": [
+        "git",
+        "show",
+        "6b0fc8f386d467b955269b2c5557b85908e211fe:policy/delivery.md"
+      ],
+      "exit_code": 0,
+      "stdout_sha256": "9d2b801d4a84e2ab1d189bcda7ec8d973b5309a448dbafed56ea9d0a34279ecb",
+      "stdout_bytes": 11837
+    },
+    {
+      "argv": [
+        "git",
+        "show",
+        "6e078ed3d15da0eaee8d993ee74499951ed7e6bf:policy/delivery.md"
+      ],
+      "exit_code": 0,
+      "stdout_sha256": "9d2b801d4a84e2ab1d189bcda7ec8d973b5309a448dbafed56ea9d0a34279ecb",
+      "stdout_bytes": 11837
+    },
+    {
+      "argv": [
+        "git",
+        "show",
+        "6b0fc8f386d467b955269b2c5557b85908e211fe:policy/adoption.md"
+      ],
+      "exit_code": 0,
+      "stdout_sha256": "ce52af8214ee2951e5412d7877b92630c43d441d09cc4ad7a25ce83146b51a9c",
+      "stdout_bytes": 3759
+    },
+    {
+      "argv": [
+        "git",
+        "show",
+        "6e078ed3d15da0eaee8d993ee74499951ed7e6bf:policy/adoption.md"
+      ],
+      "exit_code": 0,
+      "stdout_sha256": "ce52af8214ee2951e5412d7877b92630c43d441d09cc4ad7a25ce83146b51a9c",
+      "stdout_bytes": 3759
+    },
+    {
+      "argv": [
+        "git",
+        "show",
+        "6b0fc8f386d467b955269b2c5557b85908e211fe:policy/tool-adaptation-matrix.md"
+      ],
+      "exit_code": 0,
+      "stdout_sha256": "6a9a2991be381857348614d4c4019f6b20e832e6e04f81c2138f904240a470c6",
+      "stdout_bytes": 3141
+    },
+    {
+      "argv": [
+        "git",
+        "show",
+        "6e078ed3d15da0eaee8d993ee74499951ed7e6bf:policy/tool-adaptation-matrix.md"
+      ],
+      "exit_code": 0,
+      "stdout_sha256": "6a9a2991be381857348614d4c4019f6b20e832e6e04f81c2138f904240a470c6",
+      "stdout_bytes": 3141
+    },
+    {
+      "argv": [
+        "git",
+        "show",
+        "6b0fc8f386d467b955269b2c5557b85908e211fe:scripts/task.sh"
+      ],
+      "exit_code": 0,
+      "stdout_sha256": "c0c25e29c62e290fd74d508e4d3195c04e2c2a292288635791f4fc50b14aa7f2",
+      "stdout_bytes": 28944
+    },
+    {
+      "argv": [
+        "git",
+        "show",
+        "6e078ed3d15da0eaee8d993ee74499951ed7e6bf:scripts/task.sh"
+      ],
+      "exit_code": 0,
+      "stdout_sha256": "c0c25e29c62e290fd74d508e4d3195c04e2c2a292288635791f4fc50b14aa7f2",
+      "stdout_bytes": 28944
+    },
+    {
+      "argv": [
+        "git",
+        "show",
+        "6b0fc8f386d467b955269b2c5557b85908e211fe:tests/test_task.py"
+      ],
+      "exit_code": 0,
+      "stdout_sha256": "330829bc3327a94d10244af03d3e2c0fe17917fc878734ee15afd57b5f765a7e",
+      "stdout_bytes": 50724
+    },
+    {
+      "argv": [
+        "git",
+        "show",
+        "6e078ed3d15da0eaee8d993ee74499951ed7e6bf:tests/test_task.py"
+      ],
+      "exit_code": 0,
+      "stdout_sha256": "330829bc3327a94d10244af03d3e2c0fe17917fc878734ee15afd57b5f765a7e",
+      "stdout_bytes": 50724
+    },
+    {
+      "argv": [
+        "git",
+        "diff",
+        "--name-status",
+        "878e0e7ceba3bb6b78c36c5113eacc846a7f017b...6e078ed3d15da0eaee8d993ee74499951ed7e6bf"
+      ],
+      "exit_code": 0,
+      "stdout_sha256": "79701ff517c50e298b81b5e5a55a7819c1fb6ddfd33b49e2fc9486d8b07cdd62",
+      "stdout_bytes": 201,
+      "stdout": "A\t.task/feature-goal-continuity.md\nA\t.task/reviews/goal-continuity.json\nM\tPROJECT.md\nM\tpolicy/adoption.md\nM\tpolicy/delivery.md\nM\tpolicy/tool-adaptation-matrix.md\nM\tscripts/task.sh\nM\ttests/test_task.py\n"
+    },
+    {
+      "argv": [
+        "git",
+        "diff",
+        "--raw",
+        "878e0e7ceba3bb6b78c36c5113eacc846a7f017b...6e078ed3d15da0eaee8d993ee74499951ed7e6bf"
+      ],
+      "exit_code": 0,
+      "stdout_sha256": "3d7f251b5fceb0db2cfdf5bd65ff9fc7015ad824000d3381c4ae55b668c67789",
+      "stdout_bytes": 449,
+      "stdout": ":000000 100644 0000000 3165698 A\t.task/feature-goal-continuity.md\n:000000 100644 0000000 1ba893e A\t.task/reviews/goal-continuity.json\n:100644 100644 2a3b79c a7f5ad1 M\tPROJECT.md\n:100644 100644 f0e4fed f98ea77 M\tpolicy/adoption.md\n:100644 100644 f487bdc 2549bcb M\tpolicy/delivery.md\n:100644 100644 c0d05d1 4186f58 M\tpolicy/tool-adaptation-matrix.md\n:100755 100755 4fc4cdb 754a888 M\tscripts/task.sh\n:100644 100644 a36c016 9a0c09c M\ttests/test_task.py\n"
+    },
+    {
+      "argv": [
+        "git",
+        "diff",
+        "b6974fa0d6fba0d28984fcfcb4418c541b83f915..6b0fc8f386d467b955269b2c5557b85908e211fe",
+        "--",
+        "PROJECT.md",
+        "policy/delivery.md",
+        "policy/adoption.md",
+        "policy/tool-adaptation-matrix.md",
+        "scripts/task.sh",
+        "tests/test_task.py"
+      ],
+      "exit_code": 0,
+      "stdout_sha256": "fd197477181cba0f04b714dd9862f373e16c5a15f3a078d30c88987a1c7db868",
+      "stdout_bytes": 12277
+    },
+    {
+      "argv": [
+        "git",
+        "diff",
+        "878e0e7ceba3bb6b78c36c5113eacc846a7f017b...6e078ed3d15da0eaee8d993ee74499951ed7e6bf",
+        "--",
+        "PROJECT.md",
+        "policy/delivery.md",
+        "policy/adoption.md",
+        "policy/tool-adaptation-matrix.md",
+        "scripts/task.sh",
+        "tests/test_task.py"
+      ],
+      "exit_code": 0,
+      "stdout_sha256": "fd197477181cba0f04b714dd9862f373e16c5a15f3a078d30c88987a1c7db868",
+      "stdout_bytes": 12277
+    },
+    {
+      "argv": [
+        "git",
+        "diff",
+        "--raw",
+        "6b0fc8f386d467b955269b2c5557b85908e211fe..6e078ed3d15da0eaee8d993ee74499951ed7e6bf",
+        "--",
+        "deps",
+        "modules"
+      ],
+      "exit_code": 0,
+      "stdout_sha256": "d7def010b5edb46cc77ae7f3d2da4e5aafee2474a3253ca114ac3ed07804d88c",
+      "stdout_bytes": 201,
+      "stdout": ":160000 160000 65aaebc 343b1e6 M\tdeps/agent-intent\n:160000 160000 c5b9dca ead690b M\tdeps/agent-native\n:160000 160000 fc9620e 029edc0 M\tdeps/agent-squad\n:160000 160000 dc6d998 68addfd M\tmodules/backend\n"
+    }
+  ],
+  "comparison_results": [
+    {
+      "path": "PROJECT.md",
+      "byte_identical": true,
+      "old_sha256": "083ba30a5fb2aba60d0468f0afbda7897cb08e984abe39417c1d51568bc3beeb",
+      "new_sha256": "083ba30a5fb2aba60d0468f0afbda7897cb08e984abe39417c1d51568bc3beeb",
+      "bytes": 1720
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "policy/delivery.md",
+      "byte_identical": true,
+      "old_sha256": "9d2b801d4a84e2ab1d189bcda7ec8d973b5309a448dbafed56ea9d0a34279ecb",
+      "new_sha256": "9d2b801d4a84e2ab1d189bcda7ec8d973b5309a448dbafed56ea9d0a34279ecb",
+      "bytes": 11837
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "policy/adoption.md",
+      "byte_identical": true,
+      "old_sha256": "ce52af8214ee2951e5412d7877b92630c43d441d09cc4ad7a25ce83146b51a9c",
+      "new_sha256": "ce52af8214ee2951e5412d7877b92630c43d441d09cc4ad7a25ce83146b51a9c",
+      "bytes": 3759
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "policy/tool-adaptation-matrix.md",
+      "byte_identical": true,
+      "old_sha256": "6a9a2991be381857348614d4c4019f6b20e832e6e04f81c2138f904240a470c6",
+      "new_sha256": "6a9a2991be381857348614d4c4019f6b20e832e6e04f81c2138f904240a470c6",
+      "bytes": 3141
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "scripts/task.sh",
+      "byte_identical": true,
+      "old_sha256": "c0c25e29c62e290fd74d508e4d3195c04e2c2a292288635791f4fc50b14aa7f2",
+      "new_sha256": "c0c25e29c62e290fd74d508e4d3195c04e2c2a292288635791f4fc50b14aa7f2",
+      "bytes": 28944
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "tests/test_task.py",
+      "byte_identical": true,
+      "old_sha256": "330829bc3327a94d10244af03d3e2c0fe17917fc878734ee15afd57b5f765a7e",
+      "new_sha256": "330829bc3327a94d10244af03d3e2c0fe17917fc878734ee15afd57b5f765a7e",
+      "bytes": 50724
+    }
+  ],
+  "six_file_patch_identical_to_original_review": true,
+  "final_task_scope": {
+    "changed_paths": [
+      ".task/feature-goal-continuity.md",
+      ".task/reviews/goal-continuity.json",
+      "PROJECT.md",
+      "policy/adoption.md",
+      "policy/delivery.md",
+      "policy/tool-adaptation-matrix.md",
+      "scripts/task.sh",
+      "tests/test_task.py"
+    ],
+    "scope_matches_approved_change": true,
+    "business_or_gitlink_changes_relative_to_new_main": false,
+    "additional_review_artifact": ".task/reviews/goal-continuity.json preserves the original review and original object identity"
+  },
+  "findings": {
+    "Critical": [],
+    "Important": [],
+    "Minor": [
+      {
+        "location": ".task/feature-goal-continuity.md:79,83",
+        "issue": "The fixed candidate still says the product awaits user review, while lines 10-13 already record the user approval and authorized delivery phase.",
+        "impact": "Task handoff status is internally inconsistent; this does not invalidate the unchanged implementation review.",
+        "recommendation": "Refresh these historical status summaries during the already planned delivery-result update before final handoff."
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  "reusable_evidence": {
+    "scope": [
+      "PROJECT.md",
+      "policy/delivery.md",
+      "policy/adoption.md",
+      "policy/tool-adaptation-matrix.md",
+      "scripts/task.sh",
+      "tests/test_task.py"
+    ],
+    "conclusion": "Original content-review conclusions remain applicable to the six byte-identical files, and their exact patch against the new main base is also unchanged.",
+    "historical_test_limit": "Original 104-test result retains its original tested HEAD; it is not relabeled as a new-head or new-combination test result.",
+    "original_report": ".task/reviews/goal-continuity.json at 6e078ed3d15da0eaee8d993ee74499951ed7e6bf",
+    "source_limit": "Local analysis and captured command results remain SELF; no promotion to authenticated GATE or REPLAY."
+  },
+  "combination_verification_required": {
+    "changed_component_paths_since_old_review": [
+      "deps/agent-intent",
+      "deps/agent-native",
+      "deps/agent-squad",
+      "modules/backend"
+    ],
+    "boundary": "These pointers came from synchronization with the new main base and are absent from the final task diff. Their combined behavior requires the currently running full make test/build and subsequent matching CI; this review does not judge or predict those results."
+  },
+  "not_run_or_judged": [
+    "Tests, full build, CI and platform approval",
+    "Business/component implementation introduced by upstream",
+    "Current remote branch freshness beyond the supplied fixed base",
+    "Final task-card evidence completeness after ongoing tests"
+  ],
+  "technical_conclusion": "Review applicability confirmed for the approved unchanged implementation. No content-review blocker; metadata status should be refreshed during delivery. New combination checks and actual merge gates remain separate.",
+  "side_effects": "Only this /tmp JSON report was written; repository access used git show and git diff against fixed refs."
+}

.task/reviews/goal-continuity.json

@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+{
+  "review_type": "bounded independent local read-only technical review",
+  "evidence_source": "SELF",
+  "identity_limit": "Independent subagent execution does not authenticate GATE or REPLAY identity; receipt source remains SELF.",
+  "base": "b6974fa0d6fba0d28984fcfcb4418c541b83f915",
+  "head": "6b0fc8f386d467b955269b2c5557b85908e211fe",
+  "worktree": "/home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-goal-continuity",
+  "files": [
+    "PROJECT.md",
+    "policy/delivery.md",
+    "policy/adoption.md",
+    "policy/tool-adaptation-matrix.md",
+    "scripts/task.sh",
+    "tests/test_task.py",
+    ".task/feature-goal-continuity.md"
+  ],
+  "checks": [
+    {
+      "receipt": "/tmp/goal-continuity-review-replay-20261007.json",
+      "command": "make test-governance && python3 /tmp/goal-continuity-checks-20261007.py && git diff --check",
+      "before_head": "6b0fc8f386d467b955269b2c5557b85908e211fe",
+      "after_head": "6b0fc8f386d467b955269b2c5557b85908e211fe",
+      "exit_code": 0,
+      "source": "SELF",
+      "receipt_sha256": "5aeb5f32f0647ea71e28a9119af66e94d3b6cdca29f1d96340d2d12e57ced554",
+      "output_sha256": "42ae00efd2eeb1289d1f3125f3d5bd32bbdd6dfe4e8fc47e2ec239f36865e5c4"
+    },
+    {
+      "receipt": "/tmp/goal-continuity-review-static-20261007.json",
+      "command": "bash -n scripts/task.sh && git diff --check b6974fa0d6fba0d28984fcfcb4418c541b83f915..6b0fc8f386d467b955269b2c5557b85908e211fe",
+      "before_head": "6b0fc8f386d467b955269b2c5557b85908e211fe",
+      "after_head": "6b0fc8f386d467b955269b2c5557b85908e211fe",
+      "exit_code": 0,
+      "source": "SELF",
+      "receipt_sha256": "714a438b2ef5e580f06763f6dc62432e1d6556878a2186cf0fe38a3800025236",
+      "output_sha256": "e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855"
+    }
+  ],
+  "strengths": [
+    {
+      "location": "policy/delivery.md:45",
+      "assessment": "Covers unique master record, entrypoint, minimum fields, pending confirmation, current-version task association, progress updates, preferred next task, rationale, prerequisites, acceptance, duplicate checks and authorization boundary."
+    },
+    {
+      "location": "scripts/task.sh:190",
+      "assessment": "Adds literal template fields only; unresolved planning and next-task authorization default to pending/unapproved; existing lifecycle logic and card header remain unchanged."
+    },
+    {
+      "location": "tests/test_task.py:596",
+      "assessment": "Extends a real disposable Git lifecycle test to inspect generated fields and pending/unapproved defaults while retaining existing authorization/review checks."
+    },
+    {
+      "location": "policy/tool-adaptation-matrix.md:18",
+      "assessment": "Documents manual capability without claiming effective planning validation, automatic scheduling or execution controls."
+    },
+    {
+      "location": "scripts/task.sh:325",
+      "assessment": "Existing close/backfill parsing uses unchanged branch/status/header patterns; new fields do not intercept them, and planning references are explicitly rooted at repository root for archive compatibility."
+    }
+  ],
+  "findings": {
+    "Critical": [],
+    "Important": [],
+    "Minor": []
+  },
+  "considered_but_declined_to_judge": [
+    {
+      "behavior": "Completeness and approval of historical business plans in proposals",
+      "reason": "Scope adds a policy and directory entrypoint; no authorization to inventory, migrate, approve or rewrite business plans."
+    },
+    {
+      "behavior": "Truth and current freshness of remote open-PR inventory and platform branch protection",
+      "reason": "Remote/API verification was excluded; author receipt remains SELF and its own next-step note requires a fresh pre-start check."
+    },
+    {
+      "behavior": "Formal human stage approval and merge readiness",
+      "reason": "This is a local pre-review with user approval, remote CI and merge explicitly pending; subagent review cannot supply human approval or platform gate identity."
+    },
+    {
+      "behavior": "Automatic enforcement of plan validity, recommendation quality and new-task scheduling",
+      "reason": "Requested capability is documented as manual; template text is not represented as execution-end enforcement."
+    }
+  ],
+  "not_reviewed": [
+    "Full make test/build and product/browser acceptance",
+    "Remote CI/platform approval identity",
+    "Business code and component behavior outside changed files",
+    "Entire task-card evidence body line-by-line; first 90 lines and targeted receipt integrity/metadata were inspected"
+  ],
+  "recommendations": [],
+  "technical_conclusion": "No material defect found in the fixed diff. Ready for user review of the local change; does not declare remote merge readiness or confer execution authorization.",
+  "preserved_state": "HEAD, index/worktree visible state, and component snapshot unchanged; review artifacts are under /tmp only.",
+  "memory_use": "MEMORY.md:34 used only to retain SELF/GATE/REPLAY distinction; current evidence rules verified from repository."
+}

.task/reviews/iterative-delivery-closure.json

@@ -0,0 +1,207 @@
+{
+  "source": "SELF",
+  "scope": "Closure metadata and receipt integrity only; independent read-only verification except this /tmp report",
+  "reviewer": "workflow_gate_audit",
+  "reviewed_at": "2026-10-07T03:25:21.422644+00:00",
+  "head": "8a8026338e3568943e02626f653524c8a7226941",
+  "base": "74e4382452a59fab598c09bb3ded96ff9495e153",
+  "result": "PASS",
+  "checks": [
+    {
+      "check": "closure_diff_scope",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "detail": {
+        "head": "8a8026338e3568943e02626f653524c8a7226941",
+        "base": "74e4382452a59fab598c09bb3ded96ff9495e153",
+        "changed_paths": [
+          ".task/archive/feature-iterative-delivery.md",
+          ".task/feature-iterative-delivery.md"
+        ],
+        "status": " M .task/archive/feature-iterative-delivery.md\n",
+        "stat": ".task/{ => archive}/feature-iterative-delivery.md | 413 +++++++++++++++++++++-\n 1 file changed, 401 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)",
+        "uncommitted_only_appends_receipts": true,
+        "card_sha256": "7a898aa0d45a9ce75e862ea64a23fdd20e6fbf22510d0bbab3edc7e37dc6783d"
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "check": "all_receipt_checksums",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "detail": {
+        "count": 29,
+        "source_values": [
+          "SELF"
+        ],
+        "failed_receipt_ids": []
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "check": "available_originals_equal",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "detail": {
+        "matched_count": 24,
+        "without_separate_tmp_original": [
+          {
+            "receipt_sha256": "298bd599936b05ed105cfd1dcc7072915393dea050bdfa2b3e40ffacd5ba9145",
+            "command": "python3 /tmp/iterative-delivery-check-docs-20261007.py && git diff --check && bash -n scripts/task.sh scripts/hooks/post-merge"
+          },
+          {
+            "receipt_sha256": "b43f740acdb11127cf4b9218fbb5000e20ac9516fabcaad2fa707b42269eb9bc",
+            "command": "make task-sync"
+          },
+          {
+            "receipt_sha256": "d6cc055aacf7973c4d1b098585f0ad44e0a600e92e95677896761945d7ec6efa",
+            "command": "make task-sync"
+          },
+          {
+            "receipt_sha256": "646d460f8597fde2486cfa7eaf87cd7c089d7800a729fd087dc183a221790d59",
+            "command": "make task-sync"
+          },
+          {
+            "receipt_sha256": "908b6b049717604136ad43f72545653591fa103534a3c22a1603e87d14084e68",
+            "command": "make task-sync"
+          }
+        ]
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "check": "three_red_results_restored_without_success_rewrite",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "detail": [
+        {
+          "original": "iterative-delivery-red-20261007-tooling-01.json",
+          "receipt_sha256": "d1cefbefe5f188cb69c959b5707b384c8a2252b8835a4a727a9054488a1b0c00",
+          "equal": true,
+          "exit_code": 1,
+          "failed_output_retained": true
+        },
+        {
+          "original": "iterative-delivery-red-20261007-tooling-02.json",
+          "receipt_sha256": "80b8169cf23cb2e3c1cf625950561365f47c013d5e930ca194605aaf248ce0e8",
+          "equal": true,
+          "exit_code": 1,
+          "failed_output_retained": true
+        },
+        {
+          "original": "iterative-delivery-archive-link-red-20261007.json",
+          "receipt_sha256": "66fe51b5f69302232ff578266e6f4956e64a749cb77ae68512a1a87a1d1b95d2",
+          "equal": true,
+          "exit_code": 1,
+          "failed_output_retained": true
+        }
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "check": "merged_receipts_preserved_except_documented_output_repair",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "detail": {
+        "merged_receipt_count": 18,
+        "missing": [],
+        "changed": [
+          {
+            "receipt_sha256": "d1cefbefe5f188cb69c959b5707b384c8a2252b8835a4a727a9054488a1b0c00",
+            "changed_fields": [
+              "output"
+            ]
+          },
+          {
+            "receipt_sha256": "80b8169cf23cb2e3c1cf625950561365f47c013d5e930ca194605aaf248ce0e8",
+            "changed_fields": [
+              "output"
+            ]
+          },
+          {
+            "receipt_sha256": "66fe51b5f69302232ff578266e6f4956e64a749cb77ae68512a1a87a1d1b95d2",
+            "changed_fields": [
+              "output"
+            ]
+          }
+        ],
+        "added_count": 11
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "check": "three_red_originals_match_pre_link_commit",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "detail": {
+        "commit": "7c524d6cb6ff5d54d671edc5cea94eaaf5a10ceb",
+        "receipt_ids": [
+          "66fe51b5f69302232ff578266e6f4956e64a749cb77ae68512a1a87a1d1b95d2",
+          "80b8169cf23cb2e3c1cf625950561365f47c013d5e930ca194605aaf248ce0e8",
+          "d1cefbefe5f188cb69c959b5707b384c8a2252b8835a4a727a9054488a1b0c00"
+        ]
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "check": "saved_ci_record_matches_merged_candidate",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "detail": {
+        "expected_head": "04a2e44fbaa00f6782be24b312fb11a271c68d71",
+        "run": 997,
+        "job": 1383,
+        "runner": "home-runner",
+        "url": "https://git-home.u1680832.nyat.app:30319/weichen/Agent-System-Dev/actions/runs/997/jobs/1383",
+        "steps": [
+          {
+            "name": "make test (boundaries, pins, libs, core, backend, frontend, ui, agent-command)",
+            "conclusion": "success"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "Build the single binary",
+            "conclusion": "success"
+          }
+        ],
+        "record_source": "SELF captured API response; CI API not re-requested in this audit"
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "check": "finish_receipt_matches_current_local_and_remote_state",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "detail": {
+        "receipt_sha256": "af87912fcd3c02e0e3dedb27da397ecc5d90abbf11b27337ebfe81e9cba4727a",
+        "exit_code": 0,
+        "after": null,
+        "after_error": "Git object could not be recorded: rev-parse --show-toplevel",
+        "task_worktree_exists": false,
+        "local_refs": "",
+        "ls_remote_output": "74e4382452a59fab598c09bb3ded96ff9495e153\trefs/heads/main\n",
+        "registered_worktrees": "worktree /home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev\nHEAD 8a8026338e3568943e02626f653524c8a7226941\nbranch refs/heads/feature/card-close-20261007-031829Z\n\nworktree /home/weichen/projects/Agent-System-Dev-wt-feature-agent-stack-n1\nHEAD 6af6d046ff413b31d38cad0def629345ba85b53b\nbranch refs/heads/feature/agent-stack-n1\n\n"
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "check": "merged_tree_matches_tested_candidate",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "detail": {
+        "candidate": "04a2e44fbaa00f6782be24b312fb11a271c68d71",
+        "merged": "74e4382452a59fab598c09bb3ded96ff9495e153",
+        "candidate_is_ancestor": true,
+        "tree_diff_paths": []
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "check": "reviewed_snapshot_stable",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "detail": {
+        "start_head": "8a8026338e3568943e02626f653524c8a7226941",
+        "end_head": "8a8026338e3568943e02626f653524c8a7226941",
+        "card_sha256": "7a898aa0d45a9ce75e862ea64a23fdd20e6fbf22510d0bbab3edc7e37dc6783d"
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "check": "uncommitted_card_change_only_appends_validated_receipts",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "detail": {
+        "base_head": "8a8026338e3568943e02626f653524c8a7226941",
+        "appended_receipt_count": 1,
+        "card_sha256": "7a898aa0d45a9ce75e862ea64a23fdd20e6fbf22510d0bbab3edc7e37dc6783d"
+      }
+    }
+  ],
+  "knownlimit": [
+    "No full governance, make test or make build rerun; this audit does not replace the earlier code review.",
+    "CI run/job data checked against captured original JSON and Git commit identity, not a new authenticated CI API query.",
+    "Checksums and available originals establish consistency, not authorship or trusted executor identity; this report remains SELF.",
+    "Other task worktree currently remains registered; this audit cannot prove every historical action in another session.",
+    "Report applies to the fixed reviewed HEAD and card SHA; later added receipts require their own integrity check.",
+    "One valid make task-sync receipt is appended after reviewed HEAD 8a80263 and is uncommitted; archive card SHA identifies the audited worktree content."
+  ]
+}

.task/reviews/iterative-delivery.json

@@ -0,0 +1,257 @@
+{
+  "status": "complete",
+  "verdict": "Ready with fixes",
+  "verdict_reason": "R1-R10 are addressed. One confirmed P3 needs a localized template/reference fix; there are no P0-P2 findings. This source review does not establish platform merge readiness: no GATE was verified.",
+  "scope": {
+    "mode": "branch-remote",
+    "base": "2147d5cb6566c301eaea3c65448bdda873093aea",
+    "branch": "feature/iterative-delivery",
+    "head_sha": "125e159924d90954c3bafc8572cc260e1e12eadc",
+    "pr_url": null,
+    "files_changed": 9
+  },
+  "intent": "Make Dev delivery iterative with ten stages and a requirements/fit table; default to stage-by-stage human review while honoring explicit scoped continuous authorization. Align generated task cards, entrypoint docs, and capability matrix; remove implicit task closure writes from post-merge without weakening safe cleanup or claiming manual approvals are machine verified.",
+  "intent_confidence": "explicit",
+  "reviewers": [
+    "correctness",
+    "project-standards",
+    "testing",
+    "agent-native",
+    "adversarial"
+  ],
+  "findings": [
+    {
+      "#": 1,
+      "autofix_class": "gated_auto",
+      "confidence": 100,
+      "evidence": [
+        "scripts/task.sh:184 -- - 流程依据：[policy/delivery.md](../policy/delivery.md)",
+        "scripts/task.sh:322-340 -- card_backfill updates status and main record, then appends closure notes; it does not rewrite relative links.",
+        "scripts/task.sh:391 and 401 -- git mv \"$c\" \".task/archive/${c##*/}\"",
+        "git ls-tree 125e159924d90954c3bafc8572cc260e1e12eadc:.task contains no policy subtree; policy/delivery.md exists at repository root."
+      ],
+      "file": "scripts/task.sh",
+      "first_evidence": "scripts/task.sh:184 -- - 流程依据：[policy/delivery.md](../policy/delivery.md)",
+      "independent_reviewers": [],
+      "line": 184,
+      "owner": "downstream-resolver",
+      "pre_existing": false,
+      "requires_verification": true,
+      "reviewers": [
+        "scope-audit"
+      ],
+      "severity": "P3",
+      "suggested_fix": "Use a plain-text repository-root reference, such as 流程依据：仓库根目录 policy/delivery.md, in the generated card and update its template assertion. This keeps the reference meaningful in both active and archived cards without modifying the generic archive mechanism.",
+      "title": "Keep the delivery reference valid after task archival",
+      "why_it_matters": "Every newly generated card has a working link while stored in .task/, but normal task-close moves it into .task/archive/ and leaves the link unchanged. The link then resolves to the nonexistent .task/policy/delivery.md, so historical task cards lose their clickable policy reference. A plain-text repository-root reference avoids dependence on the card directory.",
+      "validation_status": "confirmed",
+      "validation_reason": "The diff newly adds scripts/task.sh:184's ../policy/delivery.md link, while scripts/task.sh:391 and :401 move every closed card from .task/ to .task/archive/ without rewriting it, so it resolves to the absent .task/policy/delivery.md at reviewed head (the root policy/delivery.md exists); this occurs whenever a new task card is closed, and tests/test_task.py:605 only checks the pre-archive form.",
+      "protected_subject": null
+    }
+  ],
+  "actionable_findings": [
+    {
+      "#": 1,
+      "autofix_class": "gated_auto",
+      "confidence": 100,
+      "evidence": [
+        "scripts/task.sh:184 -- - 流程依据：[policy/delivery.md](../policy/delivery.md)",
+        "scripts/task.sh:322-340 -- card_backfill updates status and main record, then appends closure notes; it does not rewrite relative links.",
+        "scripts/task.sh:391 and 401 -- git mv \"$c\" \".task/archive/${c##*/}\"",
+        "git ls-tree 125e159924d90954c3bafc8572cc260e1e12eadc:.task contains no policy subtree; policy/delivery.md exists at repository root."
+      ],
+      "file": "scripts/task.sh",
+      "first_evidence": "scripts/task.sh:184 -- - 流程依据：[policy/delivery.md](../policy/delivery.md)",
+      "independent_reviewers": [],
+      "line": 184,
+      "owner": "downstream-resolver",
+      "pre_existing": false,
+      "requires_verification": true,
+      "reviewers": [
+        "scope-audit"
+      ],
+      "severity": "P3",
+      "suggested_fix": "Use a plain-text repository-root reference, such as 流程依据：仓库根目录 policy/delivery.md, in the generated card and update its template assertion. This keeps the reference meaningful in both active and archived cards without modifying the generic archive mechanism.",
+      "title": "Keep the delivery reference valid after task archival",
+      "why_it_matters": "Every newly generated card has a working link while stored in .task/, but normal task-close moves it into .task/archive/ and leaves the link unchanged. The link then resolves to the nonexistent .task/policy/delivery.md, so historical task cards lose their clickable policy reference. A plain-text repository-root reference avoids dependence on the card directory.",
+      "validation_status": "confirmed",
+      "validation_reason": "The diff newly adds scripts/task.sh:184's ../policy/delivery.md link, while scripts/task.sh:391 and :401 move every closed card from .task/ to .task/archive/ without rewriting it, so it resolves to the absent .task/policy/delivery.md at reviewed head (the root policy/delivery.md exists); this occurs whenever a new task card is closed, and tests/test_task.py:605 only checks the pre-archive form.",
+      "protected_subject": null
+    }
+  ],
+  "triage_groups": [],
+  "pre_existing_findings": [],
+  "requirements_completeness": {
+    "plan_source": "explicit",
+    "plan": ".task/feature-iterative-delivery.md",
+    "requirements": [
+      {
+        "id": "R1",
+        "status": "met",
+        "assessment": "Ten stages name their artifacts and exits.",
+        "evidence": "policy/delivery.md: stages and exits"
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "R2",
+        "status": "met",
+        "assessment": "Generated cards include stable requirement IDs, fit evidence, acceptance criteria and disposition.",
+        "evidence": "scripts/task.sh: requirement table"
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "R3",
+        "status": "met",
+        "assessment": "Manual review defaults and scoped continuous authorization are explicit; templates start unreviewed.",
+        "evidence": "policy/delivery.md: authorization; scripts/task.sh: stage review table"
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "R4",
+        "status": "met",
+        "assessment": "Design, implementation and test plans retain versioned approval objects, assumptions and verification methods.",
+        "evidence": "policy/delivery.md: stages, exploration and feedback loops"
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "R5",
+        "status": "met",
+        "assessment": "Four impact classes determine continuation, revision and renewed review.",
+        "evidence": "policy/delivery.md: feedback-loop impact table"
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "R6",
+        "status": "met",
+        "assessment": "Post-merge defaults to reminders; governance tests exercise real merge/pull without closure writes.",
+        "evidence": "scripts/hooks/post-merge; tests/test_task.py; independent local replay"
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "R7",
+        "status": "met",
+        "assessment": "Merge and cleanup exits preserve registered-workspace, writer and unique-file checks, with receipts outside deleted workspaces.",
+        "evidence": "policy/delivery.md: merge, cleanup and recovery; policy/governance.md"
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "R8",
+        "status": "met",
+        "assessment": "Entrypoint, adoption records, generated cards and capability classifications align; governance replay passed. Finding #1 is a narrow archival-reference defect.",
+        "evidence": "AGENTS.md; policy/adoption.md; policy/tool-adaptation-matrix.md; scripts/task.sh"
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "R9",
+        "status": "met",
+        "assessment": "Bounded experiments can precede complete design, with explicit approval and separate acceptance.",
+        "evidence": "policy/delivery.md: design exploration loop"
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "R10",
+        "status": "met",
+        "assessment": "Incremental work records discoveries, adjustments, renewed review/tests, decisions, outcomes and stopping conditions.",
+        "evidence": "policy/delivery.md: feedback loops; scripts/task.sh: exploration and iteration table"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_units": []
+  },
+  "learnings": [],
+  "agent_native_gaps": [],
+  "deployment_notes": [],
+  "residual_risks": [],
+  "testing_gaps": [
+    "Full application suite and build were not rerun at the reviewed head; the reported earlier author run is not independently verified.",
+    "Remote PR CI and GATE identity/SHA were not verified.",
+    "The later uncommitted archival-reference fix and assertion were not reviewed or verified."
+  ],
+  "coverage": {
+    "notes": [
+      "Reviewed only the nine-file diff between fixed base and head; main checkout source was not used for changed files. Full roster selected because instruction prose and changed tests rule out lite coverage.",
+      "Project standards used root AGENTS.md as instruction fallback; no CODING_STANDARDS.md applies. No matching solutions corpus or declared local pack was selected.",
+      "Independent replay by /root/delivery_review at fixed head 125e159924d90954c3bafc8572cc260e1e12eadc: make test-governance && git diff --check; exit 0, 104 tests passed. Receipt /tmp/iterative-delivery-review-replay-20261007.json remains source SELF; local evidence does not authenticate CI or reviewer identity.",
+      "Full application suite and build were not rerun by this review. Author reported they passed on 9454819 with only task metadata changed afterward; remote PR CI is not yet available and is not validated by this review.",
+      "Supplemental scope-audit is a non-independent source inspection; the five dispatched specialist reviewers returned no findings.",
+      "The root caller is preparing the minimal archival-reference fix outside the fixed review head. Review does not claim that uncommitted fix verified."
+    ],
+    "reviewer_selection": [
+      {
+        "reviewer": "correctness",
+        "tier": "session",
+        "reason": "always-on"
+      },
+      {
+        "reviewer": "project-standards",
+        "tier": "mid",
+        "reason": "AGENTS.md governs all changed files"
+      },
+      {
+        "reviewer": "testing",
+        "tier": "mid",
+        "reason": "real-Git hook tests and generated task-card assertions changed"
+      },
+      {
+        "reviewer": "agent-native",
+        "tier": "mid",
+        "reason": "agent instructions, commands and task-card context changed"
+      },
+      {
+        "reviewer": "adversarial",
+        "tier": "session",
+        "reason": "post-merge persistence side effects and command composition changed"
+      }
+    ],
+    "lite": false,
+    "cross_model": {
+      "outcome": "in-process-fallback",
+      "note": "Independent external cross-model pass not run: branch-remote scope uses the local adversarial reviewer against fixed refs. No code sent externally."
+    },
+    "validator": {
+      "outcome": "verdicts",
+      "batches": 1,
+      "confirmed": 1,
+      "rejected": 0,
+      "unresolved": 0,
+      "malformed": 0,
+      "failed": 0,
+      "shortcut_skipped": 0,
+      "shortcut_basis": "No verified independent cross-model corroboration.",
+      "bound_exceeded": false,
+      "results": [
+        {
+          "#": 1,
+          "status": "confirmed",
+          "protected_subject": null,
+          "reason": "The diff newly adds scripts/task.sh:184's ../policy/delivery.md link, while scripts/task.sh:391 and :401 move every closed card from .task/ to .task/archive/ without rewriting it, so it resolves to the absent .task/policy/delivery.md at reviewed head (the root policy/delivery.md exists); this occurs whenever a new task card is closed, and tests/test_task.py:605 only checks the pre-archive form."
+        }
+      ],
+      "protected_subject_reclassifications": 0,
+      "degraded_blockers": []
+    },
+    "suppressed_by_confidence": {},
+    "malformed_findings": 0,
+    "malformed_returns": 0,
+    "mode_aware_demotions": 0,
+    "missing_first_evidence_demotions": 0,
+    "first_evidence_backfilled": 0,
+    "settlement_evaluated": true,
+    "settlement_suppressed": 0,
+    "non_independent_attributed_sources": [
+      "scope-audit"
+    ],
+    "confidence_basis": "Direct fixed-head source evidence; no confidence promotion from scope-audit attribution or validator agreement.",
+    "independent_replay": {
+      "source": "SELF",
+      "reviewer": "/root/delivery_review",
+      "reviewer_identity_authenticated": false,
+      "head_sha": "125e159924d90954c3bafc8572cc260e1e12eadc",
+      "command": "make test-governance && git diff --check",
+      "exit_code": 0,
+      "tests_passed": 104,
+      "receipt": "/tmp/iterative-delivery-review-replay-20261007.json"
+    },
+    "gate_verified": false,
+    "failed_reviewers": [],
+    "bound_exceeded": [],
+    "compound_packs": {
+      "roots": [],
+      "errors": [],
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "apply": "Skipped: agent report-only; later author edits are outside the fixed review head."
+  },
+  "artifact_path": "/tmp/compound-engineering-1000/ce-code-review/20261007-025812-7b611869",
+  "run_id": "20261007-025812-7b611869"
+}

.task/reviews/planning-index-followup.json

@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+{
+  "schema": "planning-index-readonly-followup/v1",
+  "source": "SELF",
+  "reviewer": "/root/planning_platform",
+  "reviewed_at": "2026-10-07T14:05:35.489168+00:00",
+  "scope": "仅复核前次P2及同次INDEX修订增量；复用前次完整复核，不重审全套",
+  "previous_report": "/tmp/planning-index-review-20261007.json",
+  "fixed_objects": {
+    "documents_before": "b87b92967387a7cd0d2a3c0be42f892e037dc29a",
+    "documents_reviewed": "f8cc211296bd52074b5727ea4cd0ad7160be6dac",
+    "changed_files": [
+      "docs/proposals/INDEX.md"
+    ]
+  },
+  "verdict": "READY_FOR_USER_REVIEW",
+  "finding_resolution": [
+    {
+      "id": "PI-OWNER-1",
+      "previous_priority": "P2",
+      "status": "RESOLVED",
+      "evidence": [
+        "docs/proposals/INDEX.md:71-73 准确区分14份显式owner与5份缺项，并声明作者/PR账号不能代填",
+        "docs/proposals/INDEX.md:119 新增负责人缺项待确认行",
+        "固定SHA逐份检查19案：14份显式owner=weichen；双档/配置/跨会话/文件预览/N2五份未单列owner，文件预览第3行仅列作者"
+      ]
+    }
+  ],
+  "new_findings": [],
+  "checks": [
+    {
+      "name": "改动范围",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "detail": "old..new只有INDEX变化；原19案与源JSON/receipt均未变"
+    },
+    {
+      "name": "最小文档检查",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "command": "python3 /tmp/planning-index-check-20261007.py",
+      "exit_code": 0,
+      "observed_summary": {
+        "proposals_covered": 19,
+        "dev_pin_files": 18,
+        "verified_pr_records": 55,
+        "merged_in_fixed_main": 54,
+        "source_proposals_unchanged": true,
+        "relative_links": "valid",
+        "source_receipt": "valid and equals snapshot"
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "name": "固定修订diff空白检查",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "command": "git diff --check b87b92967387a7cd0d2a3c0be42f892e037dc29a f8cc211296bd52074b5727ea4cd0ad7160be6dac",
+      "exit_code": 0
+    },
+    {
+      "name": "来源快照与本地组合测试范围",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "evidence": "INDEX:33-35；未把make test当业务里程碑/用户流程/部署/下游验收"
+    },
+    {
+      "name": "新增历史记录链接与标题",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "evidence": "INDEX:51-52；固定SHA的历史P0-P5实施记录:1/8-15、双档实施记录:3/8-13与双档测试报告:1/3一致，仍明示不当当前验收"
+    },
+    {
+      "name": "N2本地包含与正式采纳边界",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "evidence": "INDEX:25-30 明确本地候选带入N2文件且正式采纳须协调在途#244，不等于批准业务实施"
+    }
+  ],
+  "not_run": [
+    "未重复完整业务make test/build或浏览器、模型、数据库、部署、下游验收；主执行者当前测试不属于本审阅者证据",
+    "未联网刷新PR/API或核验人类批准记录；保留原带时间SELF快照边界",
+    "未重新完整评审未修改段落，沿用前次报告其余结论",
+    "未写项目文件、Git索引、提交或分支；未派代理"
+  ],
+  "conclusion": "前次P2已解决；增量未引入新的实质问题。可提交用户审核，不表示已批准、可自行合入或业务已验收。"
+}

.task/reviews/planning-index.json

@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
+{
+  "schema": "planning-index-readonly-review/v1",
+  "reviewed_at": "2026-10-07T13:56:53.817202+00:00",
+  "reviewer": "/root/planning_platform",
+  "source": "SELF",
+  "scope": "既有规划索引、入口和随附快照的有界只读文档复核；不评审业务实现，不替用户作产品裁定",
+  "fixed_objects": {
+    "dev_head": "92e54a8e23cfcc8a17f1ddab6105398fcb1ed0fa",
+    "documents_head": "b87b92967387a7cd0d2a3c0be42f892e037dc29a",
+    "documents_base": "5542319a0474fd4e866b6daacb937b587c833ede",
+    "dev_baseline": "eb0d4b5a499322a23155c8d89a024247f6e7830d",
+    "review_end_trees_clean_and_same_sha": true
+  },
+  "replay": {
+    "status": "PASS",
+    "receipt_path": "/tmp/planning-index-review-replay-20261007.json",
+    "receipt_sha256": "486c738ea57e9f3c037fea841833c7b7bb575dd59f7fe391e90a8f7a120f0f66",
+    "command": "python3 /tmp/planning-index-check-20261007.py && git diff --check",
+    "exit_code": 0,
+    "evidence_source": "SELF",
+    "observed_output": "{\"proposals_covered\": 19, \"dev_pin_files\": 18, \"verified_pr_records\": 55, \"merged_in_fixed_main\": 54, \"source_proposals_unchanged\": true, \"relative_links\": \"valid\", \"source_receipt\": \"valid and equals snapshot\"}\n"
+  },
+  "verdict": "REVISE_ONE_FACT_THEN_READY_FOR_USER_REVIEW",
+  "user_review_readiness": "修正 INDEX.md:68 的 owner 归属事实后，可提交用户审核；这项修正不需要新产品裁定。除此之外未发现阻碍既有规划索引用途的实质问题。",
+  "findings": [
+    {
+      "id": "PI-OWNER-1",
+      "priority": "P2",
+      "confidence": 100,
+      "category": "incorrect_source_attribution",
+      "location": {
+        "file": "modules/documents/docs/proposals/INDEX.md",
+        "line": 68
+      },
+      "title": "把未标注负责人和作者字段一并写成原文 owner",
+      "claim": "前 18 份原文 owner 均为 weichen。",
+      "consequence": "用户会把索引编者推定误认成规划原文的负责人声明，掩盖四份平台专题缺 owner 的事实；违背本轮要求保存原文状态与 owner，也与索引16–17行的禁止推断规则不一致。",
+      "evidence": [
+        {
+          "file": "docs/proposals/2026-09-30-dual-tier-storage-and-multitenancy.md",
+          "line": 3,
+          "text": "仅状态 accepted；全篇未单列 owner/负责人"
+        },
+        {
+          "file": "docs/proposals/2026-09-30-configuration-surface.md",
+          "line": 3,
+          "text": "状态已批准，主任务 Backend feature/config-surface；全篇未单列 owner/负责人"
+        },
+        {
+          "file": "docs/proposals/2026-09-30-cross-session-reading.md",
+          "line": 3,
+          "text": "状态已批准，主任务 Dev feature/cross-session-reading；全篇未单列 owner/负责人"
+        },
+        {
+          "file": "docs/proposals/2026-09-30-file-preview-and-reserved-capabilities.md",
+          "line": 3,
+          "text": "作者：weichen + Agent；没有 owner 字段；作者不等于负责人声明"
+        },
+        {
+          "file": "docs/proposals/INDEX.md",
+          "lines": "16-17",
+          "text": "不能仅凭任务创建人推断全部规划的负责人"
+        }
+      ],
+      "recommended_change": "改为“原文显式标注 owner 的方案均为 weichen；双档存储、启动配置、跨会话读取未单列 owner，文件预览仅列作者，N2 亦未单列 owner，责任归属待补齐。”或者等价的限定表述。不要把任务卡 owner 回填成原文事实。",
+      "requires_new_product_decision": false,
+      "applied": false
+    }
+  ],
+  "coverage": [
+    {
+      "check": "19份Markdown方案全覆盖、相对链接和PR链接匹配快照",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "basis": "最小重放脚本；手读索引19行"
+    },
+    {
+      "check": "源方案正文未改、前18份在Dev pin与Docs main中的blob相同",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "basis": "重放逐文件hash-object；Docs基线diff仅README/INDEX/两份source JSON"
+    },
+    {
+      "check": "角色与主从关系不按日期推定；harness未被栈总案整体作废",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "basis": "harness:9、roadmap:58、stack-completion:6、N1Q1I1:4/7/315、N2:3、RDM:5"
+    },
+    {
+      "check": "原文声明、PR合入、人工批准、运行验收明确区分",
+      "result": "PASS_WITH_OWNER_FINDING",
+      "basis": "INDEX:21-35、43-66；快照55PR/54merged/reviews=[]；owner唯一事实错误见PI-OWNER-1"
+    },
+    {
+      "check": "未把全部实现、全篇替代或尚未批准当统一结论",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "basis": "INDEX:48-66、79-86、113；原文proposed仍保留，PR合入不被扩写成验收"
+    },
+    {
+      "check": "N2不重复启动，已有在途Dev#244与Docs#42采纳顺序明确",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "basis": "INDEX:66、85、88-89、119、127；Dev任务卡方案与计划节"
+    },
+    {
+      "check": "已裁定但待同步与需新确认的差异分开",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "basis": "INDEX:108-109先给统一区分；UI/auth页首与PPTX§5已有明文裁定；D25与新预览tab无明确例外；N1/Q1转出范围被保留为待核实"
+    },
+    {
+      "check": "N1/Q1/I1/I2范围差异有实际文本支持",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "basis": "N1卡:23-24/40/42；Q1卡:26/76-78对案WP5与验收；I1卡:77；I2卡:18/77；N1Q1I1案:315"
+    },
+    {
+      "check": "RDM里程碑与依赖是规划目标，不按历史零功能快照推断现状",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "basis": "INDEX:93-104；RDM:22-27/123-169，P3降级边界见162"
+    },
+    {
+      "check": "只改授权文档范围与入口",
+      "result": "PASS",
+      "basis": "Dev diff为PROJECT/Docs gitlink/本任务卡；Docs diff为README/INDEX/两份source JSON；原有19案均不变"
+    }
+  ],
+  "not_run": [
+    "未重跑业务make test/make build或浏览器/模型/数据库/部署/下游验收；主执行者已有组合测试声明不提升为本审阅者重放结果",
+    "未重新联网读取PR/API；本次验证快照与收据一致性和相关本地文档，远端状态采用明确标时的作者SELF快照，不当作本审阅实时确认",
+    "未读取外部further-objective、RDM下游仓或IDE私有计划",
+    "未验证全部功能是否实现、批准会话真实性或CI执行身份；只核对索引没有过度声称",
+    "未修订任何项目文件/原文/分支/git索引；未新增代理"
+  ],
+  "skill_use": {
+    "skill": "ce-doc-review",
+    "adaptation": "委托限定单审阅者只读并输出JSON，因此本地做一致性与可执行性核对，不分发persona、不应用修改、不询问用户"
+  },
+  "other_substantive_findings": 0
+}

AGENTS.md

@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
 # Agent 工作说明（Agent-System-Dev）
 
 本仓开发遵循 Development-Guidelines（见 `deps/development-guidelines`，gitlink 固定版本）：
-核心规则与术语见其 `core/`，按任务触发阅读 `standards/` 专题；日常交付走 `workflows/delivery.md`。
+核心规则与术语见其 `core/`，按任务触发阅读 `standards/` 专题；通用交付依据为 `workflows/delivery.md`。
+本项目的需求、设计试验、实施调整及交付**必读 [policy/delivery.md](policy/delivery.md)**：
+默认逐阶段人工评审，阶段内迭代、按影响回退；仅在用户明确授权范围内连续推进。
 
 ## UI 设计门禁（强制）
 
@@ -37,9 +39,8 @@
   `make task-finish ABANDON="--abandon <原因>"` 并记录原因；放弃不豁免现场保护。
 - **任务卡闭合（防欠账）**：分支合入 main 后，其任务卡须回填"已完成"+主记录 PR 链接并
   归档至 `.task/archive/`。`task-finish` 回收后提示所有者运行 `make task-close`，不借回收修改
-  共享主检出或推送另一任务。自动路径保留主检出 pull 触发 post-merge
-  钩子（实测 ff-only pull 也触发）；钩子内 close 只扫主检出本地 `.task/`，远端刚合入的卡片
-  要等 pull 完成才能被看到，扫不到时由手动 `make task-close` 兜底。手动闭合在主检出运行→建
+  共享主检出或推送另一任务。主检出 pull/merge 的 post-merge 钩子仅提示待办，不自动写入或推送。
+  `make task-close` 会提交、推送并可能创建 PR，须先核对闭合范围和对应授权。闭合在主检出运行→建
   `feature/card-close-*` 分支+PR，任务分支内加 `FOLD=--fold` 随当前 PR 合入。
   precheck 的 `[cards]` 行报告欠账，验收前应清零；闭合 PR 由所有者合入。
 
@@ -102,5 +103,5 @@
 - **SSH key**：`~/.ssh/home_gitea`（ED25519，公钥指纹
   `SHA256:GYXaOXIMeloQ1fKSfdJ/ndgPQzs/Ix7Hk62ekfkfQ20`，Gitea 侧密钥名 GMKtec）；
   `~/.ssh/config` 已有 `git-ssh.u1680832.nyat.app` 主机条目，克隆/推送直接可用。
-- 任务卡闭合 PR（`make task-close` / `task-finish` 自动闭合）经 API 建 PR 时以
+- 任务卡闭合 PR（获授权后运行 `make task-close`）经 API 建 PR 时以
   `GITEA_TOKEN` 环境变量传入同上的 token。

PROJECT.md

@@ -4,6 +4,14 @@
 - 组合：modules/{core,backend,frontend,ui,documents} + deps/{development-guidelines,agent-native,agent-squad,agent-intent,agent-command,error-code-system,logging-system}。
 - 部署：非容器；Releases 仓从本仓固定提交导出版本。
 
+## 方向与规划入口
+
+长期方向、目标及跨任务规划从过程仓的 [项目方向与规划索引](modules/documents/docs/proposals/INDEX.md)
+查找主记录、里程碑和关联任务；原始正文沿用 [方案与规划目录](modules/documents/docs/proposals/)。
+确立或调整具体方向时，在本入口维护其主记录链接；正文、确认依据和进展仍以该主记录为准。
+目录中的既有文档不因被收录而自动成为已批准规划。记录、任务关联及收尾建议按
+[交付规范的长期方向与任务衔接](policy/delivery.md#长期方向与任务衔接) 执行。
+
 ## 验证
 
 `make test` 先核对子模块工作树与固定指针，再运行治理脚本、公开边界、跨仓指针、库及各模块

examples/downstream-rdm/plugin_test.go

@@ -88,6 +88,9 @@ func (f fakeHost) ArtifactGet(artifactID string) (core.Artifact, error) {
 	return core.Artifact{}, errors.New("not found")
 }
 func (f fakeHost) ArtifactContent(artifactID string) ([]byte, error) { return nil, nil }
+func (f fakeHost) ParseDocument(ctx context.Context, filename, mime string, content []byte) (core.ParsedDocument, error) {
+	return core.ParsedDocument{}, nil
+}
 
 func TestRdmPingHandler(t *testing.T) {
 	out, err := rdmPing(context.Background(), fakeHost{owner: "alice"}, extension.Request{

policy/adoption.md

@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 | standards/verification.md | 验收 | 本地 make test-governance + 组合测试；当前证据与历史 scratch 记录分开 |
 | standards/multi-repo.md | 跨仓/gitlink | manual；受控历史迁移通道已于 2026-09-30 行使一次（documents/records/2026-09-30-history-migration.md） |
 | 工作区回收 | 交付终点 | advisory（task-finish）；负例：合入前 finish 拒绝输出 |
+| policy/delivery.md（项目收紧） | 需求、长期方向、试验、实施迭代及交付 | manual：人工评审和有范围的连续推进授权；方向主记录及任务收尾建议；任务卡提供记录，post-merge 默认只提示，行为回归见 tests/test_task.py |
 | standards/tool-adaptation.md（draft.8） | 为工具创建规则/钩子实例 | 本组合 CLI/git 级实例已登记：policy/tool-adaptation-matrix.md（A1–A7 逐行定级+正负例证据） |
 | 同上（zcode 实例） | zcode 客户端写路径 | policy/tool-adaptation-zcode.md：PreToolUse 写守卫；脚本负例与客户端接线分开，客户端 pending-live |
 | core/baseline.md「规范层级」+ documentation.md「记忆分层/机制化」（draft.9） | 层级效力、记忆权威、经验机制化 | manual：本仓 policy/ 仅收紧不放宽；记忆四层按条文执行（任务卡=任务记忆，documents/records=项目记忆，Dev 仓 AGENTS.md 指针已就位） |
@@ -25,6 +26,7 @@
 | 原规则/章节 | 项目采用方式 | 原因与风险 | 负责人/复查条件 |
 |---|---|---|---|
 | baseline 硬边界 1（授权范围） | 高后果双钥匙：改写历史/解除分支保护/删归档/发布——Agent 只准备，用户执行（AGENTS.md 条文） | 单人+Agent 场景下消除单点；风险=用户不在场时高后果操作排队 | weichen；首次触发时复查 |
+| delivery.md §2、design-verification.md 的轻量流程默认做法 | 按 [policy/delivery.md](delivery.md) 默认逐阶段人工评审；小任务简化篇幅，阶段内可迭代；明确授权时在指定范围连续推进 | 保留需求、方案和实施决策权；按变化影响重审，避免每条命令审批及全流程重复返工 | weichen；阶段等待或试验边界影响交付时复查 |
 
 - 历史记录（2026-09-30）报告 11 个组合仓 main 禁直推、拒绝陈旧候选；当前平台能力须独立重验，本地脚本测试不替代远端证据。
 - 当前规范内容以 gitlink 及其 VERSION 为准。治理可靠性修复的命令与证据约定见 [开发门禁](governance.md)，本地与客户端/平台能力分别登记；本轮不改变分支保护、发布授权或通用库版本。

policy/architecture-baseline.json

@@ -4,7 +4,9 @@
   "backend/app backend/cmdbus",
   "backend/app backend/config",
   "backend/app backend/hostapi",
+  "backend/app backend/ingest",
   "backend/app backend/intentgate",
+  "backend/app backend/intentsem",
   "backend/app backend/pgbus",
   "backend/app backend/plugins",
   "backend/app backend/profiles",
@@ -26,16 +28,21 @@
   "backend/pgbus backend/store",
   "backend/plugins backend/settings",
   "backend/plugins backend/store",
+  "backend/plugins backend/skills",
   "backend/plugins backend/tools",
   "backend/plugins backend/workflow",
   "backend/profiles backend/store",
   "backend/prompts backend/store",
   "backend/rag backend/settings",
   "backend/rag backend/store",
+  "backend/route backend/intentgate",
   "backend/runmgr backend/bus",
   "backend/runmgr backend/cardsvc",
+  "backend/runmgr backend/cmdbus",
   "backend/runmgr backend/ingest",
+  "backend/runmgr backend/intentgate",
   "backend/runmgr backend/profiles",
+  "backend/runmgr backend/route",
   "backend/runmgr backend/runtime",
   "backend/runmgr backend/settings",
   "backend/runmgr backend/store",
@@ -46,7 +53,7 @@
   "backend/runtime backend/prompts",
   "backend/runtime backend/quality",
   "backend/runtime backend/squadadapter",
-  "backend/runtime backend/tools",
+  "backend/runtime backend/wfcompile",
   "backend/runtime backend/workflow",
   "backend/server backend/cardsvc",
   "backend/server backend/cmdbus",
@@ -56,6 +63,7 @@
   "backend/server backend/profiles",
   "backend/server backend/prompts",
   "backend/server backend/ratelimit",
+  "backend/server backend/route",
   "backend/server backend/runmgr",
   "backend/server backend/settings",
   "backend/server backend/store",
@@ -65,6 +73,8 @@
   "backend/squadadapter backend/quality",
   "backend/store backend/blobstore",
   "backend/tools backend/quality",
+  "backend/wfcompile backend/tools",
+  "backend/wfcompile backend/workflow",
   "frontend/app frontend/components",
   "frontend/components frontend/app"
 ]

policy/delivery.md

@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+# 需求、试验与迭代交付
+
+适用：本项目的需求、修复、规范修改和其他交付任务。依据固定版本的
+[通用交付流程](../deps/development-guidelines/workflows/delivery.md)，本项目收紧为
+**默认逐阶段人工评审；阶段内迭代，按影响回退，按增量交付**。
+本文件是阶段与评审的权威表述；启动、同步、命令证据和回收操作见
+[开发门禁](governance.md)。规则的执行能力见 [能力矩阵](tool-adaptation-matrix.md)。
+
+## 授权与阶段评审
+
+任务卡默认记为 `manual`。完成当前阶段产物并取得人工评审结论后，才进入下一阶段。
+评审记录包含阶段、对象版本、评审人、时间、结论、意见及可追溯依据；结论使用
+未评审、通过、需修改、拒绝、不适用。人工结论与命令执行证据分开记录；Agent 自审、
+测试通过、工具写入或用户沉默均不能代替人工批准，也不能由作者代签独立审核。
+
+只有用户明确要求自动或连续推进时，才将对应范围记为 `authorized-continuous`，记录
+授权来源、覆盖阶段、允许动作、交付终点、资源约束和停止条件。未覆盖阶段仍逐阶段评审。
+授权连续推进不免除需求分析、试验判定、测试、代码 Review、证据和平台准入；
+既有独立审核要求及高后果操作双钥匙仍有效。单独的合入授权不补齐尚不存在的前序产物。
+
+阶段内已授权的调查、编辑、自检、缺陷修复和等价实现可以持续进行，无需逐命令批准。
+需求拆解、评估、需求表可以共用一份任务卡，但分别保留阶段结论。小任务缩短篇幅；
+确实不适用的内容说明原因，经人工确认或在明确授权的裁剪范围内处理，不能静默跳步。
+任务启动检查、独立工作区和收据用于准备现场，不表示任何阶段评审已通过。
+
+## 阶段与出口
+
+| 阶段 | 必需产物 | 进入下一阶段的条件 |
+|---|---|---|
+| 1 需求拆解 | 目标、用户场景、子需求、边界、非目标及待澄清问题 | 人工确认拆解与原始意图一致 |
+| 2 需求评估 | 价值、可行性、成本、风险、依赖、现有能力及在途任务重叠；与项目定位、模块职责和公开契约的符合度 | 人工确认取舍；重大未知转入下述受控试验 |
+| 3 需求表确认 | 稳定 ID、描述、适配依据、优先级、可判定验收条件、依赖和处理结论 | 人工确认本增量范围；影响实施的关键待核实项已处理 |
+| 4 方案设计 | 推荐方案与主要备选、职责和接口、数据与权限影响、失败恢复、待验证假设及试验结论 | 人工批准当前方案版本及剩余风险处理方式 |
+| 5 实施计划 | 关联需求的工作项、依赖顺序、责任人、文件或模块范围、测试方法与环境、完成条件及停止条件 | 人工批准当前实施和测试计划；远期工作可保留粗粒度 |
+| 6 实施与自检 | 可审查变更、局部测试、计划偏差与迭代记录 | 人工确认当前增量实现产物，必要设计调整已重新获批 |
+| 7 正式测试与验收 | 需求到证据映射；正常、异常、边界、回归结果及缺项 | 人工审阅当前候选的验证结果；正式验收前同步并固定被测对象 |
+| 8 代码 Review | 需求符合性、正确性、维护性、测试充分性及问题闭合记录 | 完成必要重放、整改、补测和复审，由有权评审者放行当前版本 |
+| 9 合入 | 最新 base/head、必要检查及评审、冲突处置、合入授权 | 合入前再次同步核验；经 PR 合入后取得真实合入结果 |
+| 10 合入核验与收口 | 实际合入内容及组件版本、验证依据、成果保存位置、写者状态、清理清单、任务归档安排及适用规划的进展与下一步建议 | 清理前取得人工批准或对应连续推进授权；安全回收后核对结果、闭合任务卡 |
+
+表中的人工节点仅在明确的连续推进授权范围内按授权执行；阶段产物及验证条件保留。
+正式测试和最终 Review 的顺序不限制设计阶段试验、实施期测试或提前审阅。
+文本合并无冲突不证明组合兼容；合入后仍核验真实内容与被测候选是否一致。
+
+## 长期方向与任务衔接
+
+用户提出大方向、长期目标或跨任务规划时，必须在项目中留存可接续的主记录，不能仅保留
+在聊天、IDE 私有计划或执行者记忆中。优先更新已有相关规划；确需新文档时，沿用
+过程仓的 `modules/documents/docs/proposals/`，并在 [项目入口](../PROJECT.md) 提供链接。
+正文只维护一处，任务卡和其他入口引用文档及版本，不复制另一份规划状态。
+
+主记录至少包括：目标及背景、范围及成功标准、阶段或里程碑、关联方案和任务、来源、
+负责人、确认状态、推进状态及更新时间。只有方向时可以先写简短目标记录，未知项标待定。
+未确认的想法标“待确认”；确认依据与版本另记，不能由“已记录”推断“已批准”。
+方向、范围或优先级调整时保留原决定、变更原因及批准依据，更新受影响的方案和任务引用。
+
+启动或恢复相关任务时，先读取适用方向及规划的当前有效版本，核对本任务所属里程碑、
+已有实现和在途任务。多个规划相互冲突或优先级不明时，记录冲突并提交人工决定，
+不凭文档标题、日期或本地旧副本擅自选择权威。
+
+任务完成时，如果存在适用方案或规划，必须依据实际结果更新其进展，并在任务主记录和
+最终交付说明中给出下一步任务建议：
+
+- 说明本任务推进了哪个目标或里程碑，以及剩余差距；区分已实现、已验证、已合入和已部署。
+- 优先推荐一个下一任务，说明要解决的问题、关联规划及版本、推荐理由和优先顺序依据。
+- 写明前置条件、依赖、待确认事项、预期产物和可判定验收条件；必要时补充备选及取舍。
+- 建议前核对已有或在途任务；已有任务覆盖时引用该任务及待续办内容，避免重复安排。
+- 无适用规划或规划已经完成时如实说明；存在阻塞时列出阻塞条件，优先建议澄清、验证假设
+  或解除阻塞的任务，不为凑出下一步虚构工作。
+
+进展更新和建议属于当前任务的收尾产物。跨仓更新遵循对应工作区、版本和评审要求；
+更新尚未获批或合入时，任务卡保留待更新内容、负责人和下一动作，不能声称原规划已更新。
+**下一步建议不等于启动授权**：没有覆盖该任务的明确授权，建议停留在待确认状态；
+当前任务的完成、批准或连续推进授权不自动扩展到新任务。
+
+## 需求表与追溯
+
+需求表以任务卡为主记录。项目符合度使用“符合 / 需调整后符合 / 不符合 / 待核实”，
+附当前源码、项目约束或实测依据。处理结论使用“纳入本增量 / 后续处理 / 拒绝 / 待定”，
+与符合度分开；关键依据缺失时保留待核实，不凭推测判定通过。
+
+每个纳入实施的需求必须能追溯到：
+
+`需求 ID 与验收条件 → 方案及工作项 → 测试或审阅方法 → 当前版本结果与证据`。
+
+没有可判定验收方法的需求先澄清；待定或不符合的需求未经重新评审不得进入正式实施。
+跨模块、权限、持久化、异步和恢复需求按实际风险补充真实链路及故障场景。
+规范和文档任务采用差异、链接、规则一致性及相关工具行为检查，不制造无关业务测试。
+
+## 设计探索循环
+
+需求分析和设计阶段允许先试验再完善方案，无须先批准尚未能确定的完整设计。
+执行试验前提交最小试验计划：待回答的问题或假设、对象和隔离环境、方法、预期判据、
+允许副作用、时间或成本边界、停止条件及产物保存或处置方式，并取得人工批准；
+已有连续推进授权明确覆盖该试验范围时，引用该授权。
+
+在已批准范围内可以反复尝试：
+
+`初步方案 → 批准试验范围 → 原型或测试 → 分析证据 → 修订方案与计划 → 结果评审`。
+
+记录成功、失败及不确定结果，以及下一步继续探索、采用、换方案或暂停的理由。
+超出范围、触及未授权共享环境、达到预算或持续无有效进展时，暂停受影响试验并提交决策。
+无需强求全部未知一次消除；影响下一步的关键假设必须有结论，其余风险有责任人与处理安排。
+
+原型标明用途和限制，不自动成为正式实现。决定复用时纳入方案、计划、代码 Review 与正式验证。
+试验成功仅证明相应假设，不能替代验收；失败结果用于调整方案，不能静默降低验收标准。
+
+## 实施、测试与 Review 的反馈循环
+
+按可独立验证的增量推进；近期工作细化到可执行，后续工作根据证据逐步细化。
+每轮形成“发现与证据 → 原假设或困难 → 调整及影响 → 重审和补测范围 → 决策 → 结果”。
+记录放在同一任务卡，较长材料只引用文件或 PR，避免多份状态。
+
+### 智能体行为面的真实验证（2026-10-09 裁定）
+
+改动智能体行为面的 PR——提示词库、技能配方（SKILL 与 housestyle）、工具描述与
+注册面、上下文组装与回放、终轮门禁与评分——须附**真实模型的任务级前后对照**
+（`modules/backend/eval/live/` 基线，或等价的最小重放集），写入任务卡并标注来源
+（GATE/REPLAY/SELF）。单测与 mock 回放不覆盖模型实际行为，只能证明机制，不能
+替代该对照。确无条件跑真实模型时，在任务卡显式标注 `NOT_RUN` 并说明原因与
+补救计划；不得以“预期改善”措辞代替证据。评测材料不进仓（沿用 eval/README 口径）。
+
+| 变化 | 执行动作与评审边界 |
+|---|---|
+| 已批准范围内的内部组织、等价实现、局部缺陷修正 | 当前阶段继续调整、自测并记录；阶段出口统一人工评审 |
+| 技术路线、模块职责、公开契约、数据或权限设计、外部影响，或计划的关键依赖、交付顺序和资源约束变化 | 暂停受影响工作，修订方案或计划，经人工重审后继续；已有明确授权覆盖该类调整时按其边界执行 |
+| 目标、范围、优先级或验收条件变化 | 返回需求评估和需求表，取得对应批准后更新下游方案、计划和验证 |
+| 影响不明 | 先调查；仍无法判定时提交人工决定，不自行归入细节调整 |
+
+未受影响且已有授权的工作可以继续。测试或 Review 发现实现缺陷，返回实施修复；
+发现设计缺陷返回方案；发现需求理解错误返回需求阶段。只重走受影响环节，并说明
+未重走部分为何仍有效。新版本不能沿用已受影响的批准、测试或 Review 结论。
+
+批准对象使用文档修订或提交标识；正式验证固定源码、组件组合与相关配置。
+对 head/base、依赖、需求或契约变化重新判断证据及评审的有效性，按影响补测和复审。
+阶段状态、测试状态、代码审核状态及合入状态分别记录，不以一个“完成”互相替代。
+
+## 合入、清理与恢复
+
+合入与清理分别核对授权及条件。仅回收本任务登记工作区，按开发门禁核对当前权威目标、
+父子仓成果、未跟踪和 ignored 文件、独有提交与引用、活动 Git 操作以及所有写者退出。
+无法证明成果已保存时保留现场；本地删除与远端分支删除分别报告。
+
+清理前保存任务主记录与证据。执行回收时将命令输出用 evidence 的 `RECEIPT` 模式保存到
+待删目录之外；回收后的结果写入后续闭合记录，不能向已删除的任务卡补写收据。
+任务卡须回填真实主 PR 和完成状态并归档；闭合 PR 的创建、合入均依当前授权执行。
+post-merge 默认只提示，不因 pull 或 merge 自动提交、推送或创建闭合 PR。
+
+中断或交接时记录当前有效版本、批准范围、未决假设、最新试验结论、剩余事项及下一动作。
+恢复后核对现场和授权，从最早未满足的环节续办；不重做仍有效的工作，不省略失效环节。

policy/governance.md

@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
 
 本文件细化根 AGENTS.md 的启动、验证和回收规则。通用语义以固定的
 `deps/development-guidelines` 为准；门禁实现及回归用例随本仓版本管理。
+需求表、设计试验、迭代调整、阶段产物与人工评审按 [迭代交付](delivery.md) 执行。
+任务卡记录批准来源与对象版本；本地 evidence 仅记录命令，不能证明人工批准。
 
 ## 启动与恢复
 
@@ -64,6 +66,9 @@ Git 对含子模块的工作区需要显式删除选项时，只有全部现场
 owner 须先独立确认其保存与归属，工具不把缓存的远端引用当作唯一数据已经备份的证据。
 远端分支删除与本地回收分别报告，失败不能声明两者全部完成。
 回收后由所有者执行 `make task-close` 闭合卡片；回收命令不顺带改写共享主检出。
+post-merge 仅提示，不自动调用闭合。`make task-close` 会提交、推送并可能创建 PR，
+执行者先按迭代交付规则核对该动作的授权及所选任务，保留未授权的其他任务现场。
+回收命令使用待删目录之外的 `RECEIPT` 保存输出，清理结果由后续闭合记录引用。
 
 ## CI 凭据边界
 

policy/tool-adaptation-matrix.md

@@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
 | A5 回收 | 本地命令检查；写者退出由 owner 确认 | 登记根目录、锁/操作状态、父子仓与唯一文件、合入核验 | `tests/test_task.py` |
 | A6 秘密 | 本地脱敏及 CI 获取边界；权限与宿主隔离另验 | 命令/输出/摘要脱敏，凭据不持久写 Git 配置 | `tests/test_evidence.py`、`tests/test_ci_credentials.py` |
 | A7 证据 | 本地 SELF 收据；外部来源独立核验 | 首次捕获、完整脱敏输出/摘要、对象记录、原样导入 | `tests/test_evidence.py`；CI/审阅链接另核 |
+| A8 阶段评审与迭代 | manual；模板和提示不构成批准身份校验或全流程阻断 | policy/delivery.md；任务卡记录需求、方案/计划、评审与试验迭代；post-merge 默认仅提示 | `tests/test_task.py` 核对模板及钩子不自动写入；人工核对批准范围和版本 |
+| A9 长期方向与后续任务 | manual；模板不校验规划有效性或自动调度任务 | policy/delivery.md；PROJECT.md 提供规划入口，任务卡关联规划/里程碑并记录下一步建议 | `tests/test_task.py` 核对生成字段与未授权默认值；人工核对当前规划、进展、重复任务和建议依据 |
 
 ## 失败处理
 

scripts/hooks/post-merge

@@ -1,15 +1,12 @@
 #!/usr/bin/env bash
-# 本地钩子（post-merge）：pull/merge 落地后尝试闭合已合入任务卡；ff-only 也会触发。
-# precheck [cards] 报告欠账，所有者可用 make task-close 手动兜底。
+# 本地钩子（post-merge）：pull/merge 落地后提示 owner 按授权闭合任务卡；ff-only 也会触发。
+# precheck [cards] 报告欠账；此钩子只提示，不执行闭合或其他写入。
 # 触发条件收紧到"主检出 + 集成分支 main"——任务 worktree 里 task-sync 的 merge 不触发，
-# 防止把卡片闭合混进任务分支现场。失败只警告，绝不阻断 pull。
-# 注意：task.sh close 在主检出会另建 feature/card-close-* 分支提交（集成分支不直推），
-# 结束后切回 main；PR 由所有者合入。
+# 防止把卡片闭合提示混进任务分支现场。
 common=$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir) && common=$(cd "$common" 2>/dev/null && pwd) || exit 0
 mainrepo=$(dirname "$common")
 [ "$mainrepo" = "$PWD" ] || exit 0
 [ "$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD)" = "main" ] || exit 0
 [ -f "$mainrepo/scripts/task.sh" ] || exit 0
-bash "$mainrepo/scripts/task.sh" close \
-  || echo "[warn] post-merge 卡片自动闭合失败——在主检出手动运行 make task-close" >&2
+echo "[next] owner 按已有授权在主检出运行 make task-close 闭合已合入任务卡；未授权时先取得授权。"
 exit 0

scripts/lint-boundaries.sh

@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ done
 while IFS= read -r f; do
   grep -q '"agent-intent/' "$f" || continue
   case "$f" in
-    */deps/agent-squad/adapters/intent/*|*/modules/backend/internal/intentgate/*) ;;
+    */deps/agent-squad/adapters/intent/*|*/modules/backend/internal/intentgate/*|*/modules/backend/internal/intentsem/*) ;;
     *)
       echo "boundary: $f imports agent-intent" >&2
       fail=1

scripts/svc.sh

@@ -1222,7 +1222,15 @@ agent_do_start() {
   local exec_args
   if ! agent_has_explicit_cfg && [ -n "$(svc_get exec)" ]; then
     exec_args="$(svc_get exec)"
-    c_info "[$ENV_NAME] 复用上次配置（svc.env exec=；显式参数可覆盖）：$(mask_dsn "$exec_args")"
+    # G1-7：存量 exec= 里的 --dsn 剥离到环境变量（迁移；命令行不再可见明文）。
+  case "$exec_args" in
+    *--dsn\ *)
+      DSN_ENV="$(printf '%s' "$exec_args" | sed -n 's/.*--dsn \([^ ]*\).*/\1/p')"
+      exec_args="$(printf '%s' "$exec_args" | sed 's/--dsn [^ ]*//' | sed 's/[[:space:]]\{2,\}/ /g; s/^ //; s/ $//')"
+      c_info "[$ENV_NAME] DSN 已从命令行迁移到环境变量（G1-7）"
+      ;;
+  esac
+  c_info "[$ENV_NAME] 复用上次配置（svc.env exec=；显式参数可覆盖）：$(mask_dsn "$exec_args")"
   else
     local args=""
     if [ "$CLI_MOCK" = 1 ] || [ "$(env_var "$ENV_NAME" MOCK)" = "1" ]; then
@@ -1241,7 +1249,11 @@ agent_do_start() {
           c_warn "[$ENV_NAME] dbref=$(svc_get dbref) 无法重建 DSN（实例缺失或登记不全），按无数据库绑定启动"
         fi
       fi
-      [ -n "$dsn" ] && args="$args --dsn $dsn"
+      # G1-7：DSN 经环境变量传入（AGENT_SYSTEM_DSN），不再进命令行——命令行对
+      # 同机任何进程可见（含智能体生成脚本的 /proc/<pid>/cmdline），2026-10-09
+      # 方案 §3.4 实测。基座 config 优先级 CLI>env，旧 exec= 里的 --dsn 仍生效
+      # （向后兼容），但新建/重建的启动配置从此不带 DSN 明文。
+      DSN_ENV="$dsn"
       if [ -n "$dsn" ] || [ -n "$auth" ] || [ "$ENV_NAME" != dev ]; then
         [ -z "$auth" ] && auth=auto
         args="$args --auth $auth"
@@ -1282,7 +1294,9 @@ agent_do_start() {
   fi
   # 直接 nohup 简单命令：$! 即服务进程本身，pidfile 语义才成立。
   # 守卫变量走环境，不写进 exec=；旧二进制不认识这两个变量，会忽略。
-  if [ "${#guard_env[@]}" -gt 0 ]; then
+  # G1-7：DSN 同样走环境（AGENT_SYSTEM_DSN；基座 config 环境档已支持）。
+  [ -n "${DSN_ENV:-}" ] && guard_env+=("AGENT_SYSTEM_DSN=$DSN_ENV")
+  if [ "${#guard_env[@]}" -gt 0 ];then
     nohup env "${guard_env[@]}" "$ENV_BIN" serve $exec_args >> "$ENV_DIR/svc.log" 2>&1 &
   else
     nohup "$ENV_BIN" serve $exec_args >> "$ENV_DIR/svc.log" 2>&1 &

scripts/task.sh

@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ cmd_precheck() {
   else
     echo "[facts]   WARN policy/facts.md 不存在——外部事实登记表缺失（AGENTS.md 证据与验证门禁）"
   fi
-  echo "[required-reading] core/baseline.md, workflows/delivery.md §1$([ "$dirty" -gt 0 ] && echo ", standards/collaboration.md（树脏=他人或未收尾现场，不得写入）")"
+  echo "[required-reading] core/baseline.md, workflows/delivery.md §1$([ -f policy/delivery.md ] && echo ", policy/delivery.md")$([ "$dirty" -gt 0 ] && echo ", standards/collaboration.md（树脏=他人或未收尾现场，不得写入）")"
   echo "[R0] $(echo "$rmain" | cut -c1-10)（完整：$rmain）"
   if [ "$dirty" -gt 0 ] || [ "${sub_drift:-0}" -gt 0 ]; then
     echo "[verdict] SHARED_WORKSPACE_BUSY — 工作树不干净，不得写入；先收尾或经 owner 确认"
@@ -178,11 +178,54 @@ cmd_start() {
 - 工作区：${wt}（worktree）；分支：${name}
 ${parent_note}
 - 授权与交付终点：<本次允许的动作与终点；未授权事项写明>
+- 交付模式：manual（逐阶段人工评审）；明确授权后可记为 authorized-continuous
+- 自动推进授权：无；授权范围：无；授权来源：无；授权终点：无；停止条件：无（未授权）
+- 当前阶段：需求拆解；当前增量：I1（待定义）
+- 流程依据：仓库根目录 policy/delivery.md（归档后仍按仓库根目录定位）
 
 ## 目标与非目标
 
 <预期结果、受影响入口/模块/契约；明确不做什么。>
 
+## 关联方向与规划
+
+- 适用状态：待核对（无适用规划时说明原因）
+- 主记录路径/版本：待核对（路径按仓库根目录定位，归档后不变；只引用唯一正文）
+- 对应里程碑：待核对
+
+## 需求分析
+
+| ID | 描述 | 项目符合度及依据 | 优先级 | 验收条件 | 依赖 | 结论 |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+| R1 | 待填写 | 待评估 | 待定 | 待定义 | 待确认 | 待评审 |
+
+## 方案与计划
+
+- 方案引用：待填写（含对象版本）
+- 实施计划引用：待填写（含增量与需求 ID）
+- 测试计划引用：待填写（含需求 ID 与验收条件）
+
+## 阶段评审
+
+| 阶段 | 对象版本 | 结论 | 评审人 | 时间 | 依据 |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+| 需求拆解 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — |
+| 需求评估 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — |
+| 需求表确认 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — |
+| 方案设计 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — |
+| 实施计划 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — |
+| 实施与自检 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — |
+| 正式测试与验收 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — |
+| 代码 Review | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — |
+| 合入 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — |
+| 合入核验与收口 | 待定 | 未评审 | — | — | — |
+
+## 探索试验与迭代
+
+| 增量/试验 | 假设 | 范围 | 判断和停止条件 | 批准依据 | 结果 | 变更影响 | 需重审补测 |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+| 待定义 | — | — | — | 未批准 | NOT_RUN | 待评估 | 待评估 |
+
 ## 同步记录
 
 | 节点 | sync_base_sha | tested_head_sha | checked_at |
@@ -200,6 +243,21 @@ ${parent_note}
 - 结果：
 - 验证：<结论摘要 PASS/FAIL/SKIP/NOT_RUN 逐项；逐条证据由 make evidence 写入上方证据表>
 - 影响与剩余项：
+
+## 规划进展与下一步
+
+- 本次推进/剩余：待核对（依据实际成果更新适用方案/规划）
+- 首选下一任务：待核对（无适用规划、已完成或受阻时如实说明，不虚构任务）
+- 推荐依据：待填写
+- 前置条件/待确认：待核对
+- 预期产物/验收条件：待定义
+- 重复任务核对：待核对（已有/在途任务、PR 与规划记录）
+- 启动授权：未授权（建议不自动启动新任务，仍须明确授权）
+
+## 合入与清理
+
+- 合入记录：NOT_RUN（授权依据、PR、合入 SHA、验证来源）
+- 清理记录：NOT_RUN（授权依据、写者退出确认、worktree/分支/任务卡处置）
 EOF
   (cd "$wt" && IMPORT_RECEIPT="$PRECHECK_RECEIPT" bash "${SCRIPT_DIR}/evidence.sh")
   git -C "$wt" add .task

tests/test_task.py

@@ -29,6 +29,10 @@ class TaskLifecycleTests(unittest.TestCase):
                     "TASK_PARENT_BRANCH", "TASK_PARENT_PR", "FORCE_ABANDON", "TASK_TARGET_BRANCH"):
             self.env.pop(key, None)
         self.git(self.root, "init", "--bare", "--initial-branch=main", str(self.remote))
+        # receive-pack 默认在后台跑 gc --auto，与 TemporaryDirectory 清理竞态
+        # （CI 实测 OSError 39 remote.git not empty）；夹具远端无留存价值，直接关。
+        self.git(self.remote, "config", "gc.auto", "0")
+        self.git(self.remote, "config", "receive.autogc", "false")
         self.git(self.root, "init", "--initial-branch=main", str(self.repo))
         shutil.copytree(SOURCE / "scripts", self.repo / "scripts")
         (self.repo / "Makefile").write_text("precheck:\n\t@bash scripts/task.sh precheck\n")
@@ -89,6 +93,18 @@ class TaskLifecycleTests(unittest.TestCase):
         self.assertNotEqual(result.returncode, 0, result.stdout)
         self.assertIn("SYNC_REQUIRED", result.stdout)
 
+    def test_precheck_routes_existing_project_delivery_policy(self):
+        result = self.task(self.repo, "precheck")
+        self.assertNotIn("policy/delivery.md", result.stdout)
+        policy = self.repo / "policy/delivery.md"
+        policy.parent.mkdir()
+        policy.write_text("# Project delivery policy\n")
+        self.git(self.repo, "add", "policy")
+        self.git(self.repo, "commit", "-m", "Adopt project delivery policy")
+        result = self.task(self.repo, "precheck")
+        reading = next(line for line in result.stdout.splitlines() if line.startswith("[required-reading]"))
+        self.assertIn("policy/delivery.md", reading)
+
     def test_sync_materializes_updated_component(self):
         child = self.add_submodule()
         wt = self.worktree()
@@ -586,11 +602,116 @@ class TaskLifecycleTests(unittest.TestCase):
         self.task(self.repo, "start", "feature/new", env=self.env | {"PRECHECK_RECEIPT": str(receipt)})
         wt = self.root / "repo-wt-feature-new"
         self.assertTrue((wt / ".task/feature-new.md").is_file())
-        self.assertIn("make precheck", (wt / ".task/feature-new.md").read_text())
+        card = (wt / ".task/feature-new.md").read_text()
+        self.assertIn("make precheck", card)
+        self.assertIn("交付模式：manual（逐阶段人工评审）", card)
+        self.assertIn("authorized-continuous", card)
+        self.assertIn("流程依据：仓库根目录 policy/delivery.md", card)
+        for field in ("授权范围", "授权来源", "授权终点", "停止条件"):
+            self.assertIn(f"{field}：无", card)
+        for field in ("当前阶段", "当前增量", "方案引用", "实施计划引用", "测试计划引用"):
+            self.assertIn(field + "：", card)
+        self.assertIn("## 关联方向与规划\n", card)
+        planning = card.split("## 关联方向与规划\n", 1)[1].split("\n## ", 1)[0]
+        for field in ("适用状态", "主记录路径/版本", "对应里程碑"):
+            self.assertIn(field + "：待核对", planning)
+        self.assertIn("无适用规划时说明原因", planning)
+        self.assertIn("路径按仓库根目录定位，归档后不变", planning)
+        self.assertIn("只引用唯一正文", planning)
+        self.assertIn("| ID | 描述 | 项目符合度及依据 | 优先级 | 验收条件 | 依赖 | 结论 |", card)
+        reviews = card.split("## 阶段评审\n", 1)[1].split("\n## ", 1)[0]
+        self.assertIn("| 阶段 | 对象版本 | 结论 | 评审人 | 时间 | 依据 |", reviews)
+        for stage in ("需求拆解", "需求评估", "需求表确认", "方案设计", "实施计划", "实施与自检",
+                      "正式测试与验收", "代码 Review", "合入", "合入核验与收口"):
+            row = next(line for line in reviews.splitlines() if line.startswith(f"| {stage} |"))
+            self.assertEqual(row.split("|")[3].strip(), "未评审")
+        self.assertNotIn("通过", reviews)
+        self.assertIn("## 探索试验与迭代", card)
+        for field in ("假设", "范围", "判断和停止条件", "批准依据", "结果", "变更影响", "需重审补测"):
+            self.assertIn(field, card.split("## 探索试验与迭代\n", 1)[1].split("\n## ", 1)[0])
+        self.assertIn("## 规划进展与下一步\n", card)
+        next_step = card.split("## 规划进展与下一步\n", 1)[1].split("\n## ", 1)[0]
+        for field in ("本次推进/剩余", "首选下一任务", "前置条件/待确认", "重复任务核对"):
+            self.assertIn(field + "：待核对", next_step)
+        self.assertIn("推荐依据：待填写", next_step)
+        self.assertIn("预期产物/验收条件：待定义", next_step)
+        self.assertIn("无适用规划、已完成或受阻时如实说明，不虚构任务", next_step)
+        self.assertIn("已有/在途任务、PR 与规划记录", next_step)
+        self.assertIn("启动授权：未授权", next_step)
+        self.assertIn("建议不自动启动新任务，仍须明确授权", next_step)
+        self.assertIn("## 合入与清理", card)
+        for field in ("合入记录", "清理记录"):
+            self.assertIn(field + "：NOT_RUN", card)
         body = self.git(wt, "log", "-1", "--format=%B").stdout
         for field in ("Why:", "Evidence:", "Impact:", "Refs:"):
             self.assertIn(field, body)
 
+    def install_post_merge_hook(self):
+        hook = self.repo / ".git/hooks/post-merge"
+        shutil.copyfile(SOURCE / "scripts/hooks/post-merge", hook)
+        hook.chmod(0o755)
+
+    def publish_merged_task(self):
+        publisher = self.root / "publisher"
+        self.git(self.root, "clone", str(self.remote), str(publisher))
+        self.git(publisher, "switch", "-c", "feature/merged")
+        card = publisher / ".task/feature-merged.md"
+        card.parent.mkdir()
+        card.write_text("# Merged task\n任务主记录：待回填；状态：进行中；owner：test\n"
+                        "- 工作区：fixture；分支：feature/merged\n")
+        self.git(publisher, "add", ".task")
+        self.git(publisher, "commit", "-m", "Record merged task")
+        self.git(publisher, "switch", "main")
+        self.git(publisher, "merge", "--no-ff", "feature/merged", "-m",
+                 "Merge pull request 'Task' (#7) from feature/merged into main")
+        self.git(publisher, "push", "origin", "main")
+        return self.git(publisher, "rev-parse", "HEAD").stdout.strip(), card.read_text()
+
+    def assert_post_merge_only_reminds_owner(self, operation):
+        expected_head, expected_card = self.publish_merged_task()
+        self.git(self.repo, "fetch", "origin")
+        old_head = self.git(self.repo, "rev-parse", "HEAD").stdout.strip()
+        local_heads = self.git(self.repo, "show-ref", "--heads").stdout
+        worktrees = self.git(self.repo, "worktree", "list", "--porcelain").stdout
+        remote_refs = self.git(self.remote, "show-ref").stdout
+        self.install_post_merge_hook()
+        result = self.git(self.repo, *operation)
+        self.assertIn("make task-close", result.stdout)
+        self.assertIn("授权", result.stdout)
+        self.assertNotIn("[close]", result.stdout)
+        self.assertEqual(self.git(self.repo, "branch", "--show-current").stdout.strip(), "main")
+        self.assertEqual(self.git(self.repo, "rev-parse", "HEAD").stdout.strip(), expected_head)
+        self.assertEqual(self.git(self.repo, "show-ref", "--heads").stdout,
+                         local_heads.replace(old_head, expected_head))
+        self.assertEqual(self.git(self.repo, "worktree", "list", "--porcelain").stdout,
+                         worktrees.replace(old_head, expected_head))
+        self.assertEqual(self.git(self.remote, "show-ref").stdout, remote_refs)
+        self.assertEqual(self.git(self.repo, "status", "--porcelain").stdout, "")
+        self.assertEqual((self.repo / ".task/feature-merged.md").read_text(), expected_card)
+        self.assertFalse((self.repo / ".task/archive").exists())
+
+    def test_post_merge_main_merge_only_reminds_owner(self):
+        self.assert_post_merge_only_reminds_owner(("merge", "--ff-only", "origin/main"))
+
+    def test_post_merge_main_pull_only_reminds_owner(self):
+        self.assert_post_merge_only_reminds_owner(("pull", "--ff-only"))
+
+    def test_post_merge_is_silent_outside_main_checkout(self):
+        wt = self.worktree()
+        self.install_post_merge_hook()
+        self.advance_remote()
+        result = self.git(wt, "merge", "--ff-only", "origin/main")
+        self.assertNotIn("make task-close", result.stdout)
+        self.assertNotIn("[close]", result.stdout)
+        self.git(self.repo, "switch", "-c", "feature/primary")
+        self.git(wt, "switch", "-c", "feature/advance")
+        (wt / "feature-work").write_text("another task\n")
+        self.git(wt, "add", "feature-work")
+        self.git(wt, "commit", "-m", "Advance feature")
+        result = self.git(self.repo, "merge", "--ff-only", "feature/advance")
+        self.assertNotIn("make task-close", result.stdout)
+        self.assertNotIn("[close]", result.stdout)
+
     def test_start_stacked_branch_records_parent_and_main_baseline(self):
         base = self.git(self.repo, "rev-parse", "origin/main").stdout.strip()
         parent = self.worktree("feature/parent")