The progressive U2/U3 candidate shows a trustworthy host acknowledgement immediately after material intake and keeps sourced findings on the same task card. Its r0.5 tool-stream gate rejects calls when [DONE] is absent. The authorized one-shot MiniMax probe returned tool_calls and Usage 513 but no observed [DONE], so no tool was released or executed. The new r0.6 design proposes content-free transport evidence; it is awaiting written stage-4 review and changes no runtime behavior.
The task card is the canonical status and evidence record. r0.4 A01 remains FAIL, r0.5 real A01 remains NOT_RUN; all eight PRs stay drafts, with no merge or deployment.
Evidence
Before: r0.4 A01 had no accepted checkpoint or final answer; the r0.5 short tool probe again ended incomplete_terminal. Independent assessment: /home/weichen/.local/share/agent-system-evidence/fast-slow-u3-r05-terminal-20261014/probe-result-independent-assessment.md (SHA-256 f35d1c17).
After: r0.5 zero-paid HTTP/browser/isolated-PG checks and independent code review passed for the recorded component heads. The r0.6 documentation pin passed make test-pins and make test locally (SELF). Exact-head CI run 3158 passed all test, test-pg, and svc-realcombo jobs and steps for Dev 89125b8 (GATE).
Merge Danger
Door: Two-way. Blast Radius: Runtime. The change spans several repositories and the UI. Do not merge until the written r0.6 design and plan are approved, its needed behavior is implemented and validated, a separately authorized real A01 quality gate passes, and the final exact HEAD satisfies review and CI.
## Summary
The progressive U2/U3 candidate shows a trustworthy host acknowledgement immediately after material intake and keeps sourced findings on the same task card. Its r0.5 tool-stream gate rejects calls when `[DONE]` is absent. The authorized one-shot MiniMax probe returned `tool_calls` and Usage 513 but no observed `[DONE]`, so no tool was released or executed. The new [r0.6 design](https://git-home.u1680832.nyat.app:30319/weichen/Agent-System-Documents/src/branch/feature/fast-slow-u2-u3-plan/docs/proposals/2026-10-14-fast-slow-u3-r06-transport-completeness-design.md) proposes content-free transport evidence; it is awaiting written stage-4 review and changes no runtime behavior.
The [task card](https://git-home.u1680832.nyat.app:30319/weichen/Agent-System-Dev/src/branch/feature/fast-slow-u2-u3-plan/.task/feature-fast-slow-u2-u3-plan.md) is the canonical status and evidence record. r0.4 A01 remains FAIL, r0.5 real A01 remains `NOT_RUN`; all eight PRs stay drafts, with no merge or deployment.
## Evidence
- **Before:** r0.4 A01 had no accepted checkpoint or final answer; the r0.5 short tool probe again ended `incomplete_terminal`. Independent assessment: `/home/weichen/.local/share/agent-system-evidence/fast-slow-u3-r05-terminal-20261014/probe-result-independent-assessment.md` (SHA-256 `f35d1c17`).
- **After:** r0.5 zero-paid HTTP/browser/isolated-PG checks and independent code review passed for the recorded component heads. The r0.6 documentation pin passed `make test-pins` and `make test` locally (SELF). Exact-head [CI run 3158](https://git-home.u1680832.nyat.app:30319/weichen/Agent-System-Dev/actions/runs/3158) passed all `test`, `test-pg`, and `svc-realcombo` jobs and steps for Dev `89125b8` (GATE).
## Merge Danger
**Door:** Two-way. **Blast Radius:** Runtime. The change spans several repositories and the UI. Do not merge until the written r0.6 design and plan are approved, its needed behavior is implemented and validated, a separately authorized real A01 quality gate passes, and the final exact HEAD satisfies review and CI.
Why: establish the authorized task workspace and its initial baseline.
Evidence: preserved precheck receipt in .task/feature-fast-slow-u2-u3-plan.md; R0=5212fef01e59b7f9e12fa7fc42cd987c6792a786.
Impact: task metadata only; the feature workspace starts at 5212fef01e.
Refs: .task/feature-fast-slow-u2-u3-plan.md
Why: preserve current-source evidence and the reviewable next increment.
Evidence: READY receipt at5212fef, exact source and open-PR audit; plan r0.1 remains pending stage5 review.
Impact: task record, proposal link and exact Documents pin; no business code or runtime changes.
Refs: fast-slow r1.1, work-companion PR493
Why: make the stage5 planning candidate traceable and ready for human review.
Evidence: exact Documentsc2b17f6 link and seven-unit checks passed; task-sync verified5212fef; all native receipts remain SELF.
Impact: task record only; no business capabilities, experiments or deployment claimed.
Refs: U2/U3 plan r0.1, policy/delivery.md
Why: retain a coherent combination before adding the atomic projection.
Evidence: Core suite and FE UI types; material tests and startup receipts recorded as SELF.
Impact: exact component gitlinks and task record.
Refs: U2/U3 Tasks1-2
Why: Fast feedback and slow-channel discoveries need a faithful progressive user interface.
Evidence: SELF startup, contract, component, atomicity, source, and recovery receipts are recorded in the task card; final composition and live acceptance are pending.
Impact: Pins the current Core, Backend, Frontend and UI implementation without deploying existing services.
Refs: Approved fast-slow-u2-u3 r0.1; feature-fast-slow-u2-u3-plan task card
Why: Runtime checks require fixed component inputs and task-owned process identity.
Evidence: SELF live compilation receipt in the task card; model calls have not started.
Impact: Pins the current evaluator without touching existing instances.
Refs: fast-slow-u2-u3 Task 7
Why: Final task verification must include the latest authoritative composition.
Evidence: Task-sync receipt records incoming main and component conflicts; each component preserves both branches.
Impact: Retains artifact typed-nil recovery, RDM role rejection state, lifecycle governance, and task checkpoint changes.
Refs: fast-slow-u2-u3 task-sync
Why: Fixed composition checks must include the source preview version guard.
Evidence: SELF red-green and frontend build receipts are recorded in the task card.
Impact: Updates component pins and evidence only.
Refs: fast-slow-u2-u3 Task 7
Why: Acceptance must cover both immediate and deferred material flows.
Evidence: SELF fixed composition and isolated PostgreSQL receipts are retained; direct browser replay follows this producer fix.
Impact: Pins the observed flow repair and controlled test suite.
Refs: fast-slow-u2-u3 Task 7
Why: A fixed regression port collided with another task-owned preview and blocked full verification.
Evidence: SELF full-suite failure identified port 18795; the isolated fixture replays without stopping the unrelated process.
Impact: Changes one test fixture and records actual HTTP/browser acceptance; no service operations or production settings changed.
Refs: fast-slow-u2-u3 final verification
Why: Complete the approved U2/U3 fix pass and prevent shared host fixture collisions.
Evidence: Native SELF receipts record complete Backend suite, Frontend 221 tests, meaningful startup regression failures and the bounded baseline model batch.
Impact: Pin the corrected Backend and Frontend and allocate owned recovery fixture ports; no existing service deployment.
Refs: modules/documents/docs/proposals/2026-10-13-fast-slow-u2-u3-plan.md
Why: Preserve complete receipts before requiring a clean sync workspace.
Evidence: Native SELF outputs include the green corrected PG suite and remote refresh retries.
Impact: Evidence only; implementation pins remain unchanged.
Refs: feature-fast-slow-u2-u3-plan
Why: Resolve the observed conclusion and qualification defects without rewriting failed evidence.
Evidence: Native SELF model failure and red-to-green conclusion receipts are retained in the task card.
Impact: Candidate recipe changes; an A01 rerun remains outside the original six-sample authorization.
Refs: Approved U2/U3 plan r0.1
Why: Keep the accepted login recovery release and U2/U3 fixes in one current composition.
Evidence: Exact incoming Backend 467718a and Frontend 9fc7da2 were fetched and merged without source conflicts; task-sync receipts retain the gitlink conflict.
Impact: Preserve both component histories and refresh the authoritative base before final combination checks.
Refs: origin/main 268ef299; feature-fast-slow-u2-u3-plan
Why: Keep the implementation, honest failed model evidence and approved planning progress reviewable as one candidate.
Evidence: Native SELF suite, PG and meaningful red-to-green receipts; independent reviewer reports and all original model artifacts are retained.
Impact: Pin source-record and terminal-state fixes; preserve U3 acceptance and extra-sample authorization as pending, with no deployment.
Refs: Approved U2/U3 plan and validation report
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=d40d1c2e5d29bb0ce429edf2221d9c4e4bcb0dcb.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Preserve a clean reviewable candidate without treating code checks as a passed model gate.
Evidence: Native receipts retain final combination, PostgreSQL and actual HTTP/browser verification; independent code review is archived in Documents.
Impact: Save documentation and evidence, retain registered worktree and unmerged branches pending the requested extra test authorization.
Refs: U2/U3 plan r0.1 and validation report
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=719bfe945f46d43a22d7ac7025d2313faa4bf0e4.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Continue the existing delivery after explicit approval for one extra sample.
Evidence: Startup precheck READY and live output/run-limit fixture checks are recorded by evidence.
Impact: Fixed evaluation candidate, max two paid runs and no automatic retry; preserve all original failed samples.
Refs: User approval 2026-10-13
Why: Preserve authoritative settings and session changes with the source-bound work candidate.
Evidence: Merged Backend, Core and live fixture guards passed local and independent checks; extra A01 remained a real FAIL.
Impact: Save a draft-reviewable composition without claiming CI, merge, deployment or model-quality approval.
Refs: U2/U3 task card and validation report
Why: Preserve the latest combination evidence and independent failure assessment before draft review.
Evidence: Native SELF receipts capture complete local test/build and current HTTP browser checks; model quality remains FAIL.
Impact: Pin the report and code review without merging or deploying the failed candidate.
Refs: feature-fast-slow-u2-u3-plan
Why: Preserve authoritative main and both backend histories before draft review.
Evidence: Exact incoming cfb8308 merged without source conflicts; current combination and PG checks follow.
Impact: Keep session/account fixes and U2/U3 task authority in the same candidate; model gate remains failed.
Refs: Dev main aa6364f and U2/U3 task card
Why: The project entry and task card must reflect current code evidence and the failed model gate.
Evidence: Native SELF receipts and independent review report cover the exact current component combination.
Impact: Save the report and status without merging or deploying the candidate.
Refs: U2/U3 plan r0.1
Why: Freeze the draft candidate against the refreshed authoritative main.
Evidence: make task-sync recorded sync_base aa6364f and the exact tested code heads in the task card.
Impact: Evidence only; quality gate remains failed and merge remains closed.
Refs: feature-fast-slow-u2-u3-plan
weichen
marked the pull request as work in progress 2026-10-13 06:39:44 +00:00
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=c39321ab7bae6e618f13ec2b48df7abf89d44604.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Keep the exact candidate and its local result traceable before platform review.
Evidence: Imported SELF receipt for make test and make build on Dev 96fe507 with exit code 0; Backend and UI exact-head CI passed.
Impact: Document current code verification while retaining the failed model quality gate and draft merge status.
Refs: Agent-System-Dev#512
Why: Bind the newly approved one-shot model evaluation to an exact reviewed candidate.
Evidence: Follow-up harness tests passed after an expected red failure; full Backend suite passed.
Impact: Record the new bounded authorization and test-only Backend revision; U3 quality remains pending.
Refs: Agent-System-Dev#512; Agent-System-Backend#193
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=be8ba0da37bbae3190db799a5b38c5cfba657da2.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: The approved v7 sample had two committed checkpoints but failed semantic and final-result acceptance.
Evidence: Import the original failing SELF receipt, bind independently replayed usage/source findings, and pin the corrected read-only evaluation.
Impact: Keep model quality and merge gates closed while preserving six draft PRs for review.
Refs: Agent-System-Dev#512; Agent-System-Backend#193; Agent-System-Documents#95
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=55cecae703cf8c4f33185e9e4556597c11817b3b.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Bind the post-sample candidate to a clean local test and build result.
Evidence: Imported SELF receipt for make test and make build on Dev 82e8a48; independent model assessment remains FAIL.
Impact: Keep the current component pins reviewable while draft PRs and merge gates stay closed.
Refs: Agent-System-Dev#512
Why: The approved model sample violated its rejected-quote stop rule and the first guard missed JSON errors across runs.
Evidence: Original 14231-token deviation remains recorded; independent replay passed the read-only event-join guard and fail-closed cases without model calls.
Impact: Advance test-only Backend and evidence pins while keeping U3 quality and merge gates closed.
Refs: Agent-System-Dev#512; Agent-System-Backend#193; Agent-System-Documents#95
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=ff3fb4a7ebe432ab21c6b9668abc9823aca2fdd1.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Bind the reviewed component pins and unchanged quality failure to the latest local combination result.
Evidence: Imported SELF make test and make build receipt on Dev 7f667f2; Backend f74f6a0 exact-head CI and independent stop-guard review passed.
Impact: Keep six PRs draft and leave the model acceptance and merge gates closed.
Refs: Agent-System-Dev#512
Why: The approved revision spans Backend, UI and Documents and needs one reviewable Dev composition.
Evidence: Backend go test ./...; UI 158 tests and typecheck; Frontend 84 affected tests; exact component SHAs recorded in the task card.
Impact: The task card keeps real-model QA NOT_RUN and the earlier failed sample separate from this candidate.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: The target branch advanced Core, Frontend, UI and Backend pointers during the approved U3 revision.
Evidence: Core go test ./...; Backend go test ./...; UI 165 tests and typecheck; Frontend 224 tests and build passed on the resolved component trees.
Impact: Preserve both the current main settings/account/duties work and the U3 candidate at merged component SHAs.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2, task-sync receipt fast-slow-u2-u3-r02-sync-20261013.json
Why: The first task-sync encountered four real gitlink conflicts after main advanced.
Evidence: The failed SELF receipt was imported through make evidence; merged component tests passed at the recorded SHAs.
Impact: The task card preserves the failure and the subsequent resolution without upgrading model QA.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=143e6367367760deceac91ac3de5ccb3ed6adebc.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: The task branch now includes the latest target and the successful sync must be traceable.
Evidence: make evidence imported the full exit-0 SELF receipt for make task-sync.
Impact: The task card retains both the initial conflict and the resolved synchronization.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: The browser mechanism exposed an ineffective integer output cap in the isolated evaluation server.
Evidence: Backend live-tag numeric regression RED then GREEN; full Backend Go suite passed at 627b6e4.
Impact: The task records the failed first browser run and pins the fixed Backend fixture for a fresh isolated replay.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: The task-owned HTTP/browser replay and its diagnosed first failure need to be attached to the reviewable composition.
Evidence: Browser receipt f7cbd331e82a60982716bbd79bb9d54712cac4db0395966fefe08f6f380715e7 imported by make evidence.
Impact: Documents and task card distinguish mechanism PASS from real-model NOT_RUN.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: The reviewed candidate must carry its accurate browser, full-build and database evidence.
Evidence: make evidence imported the exact 8c1fc39 combination and isolated PostgreSQL SELF receipts.
Impact: The report remains explicit that final HEAD checks and real-model quality are pending.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: Final review requires a current target branch and an exact composition.
Evidence: make evidence imported the full exit-0 task-sync receipt; target remained up to date.
Impact: The task card binds the pre-review sync to the current Dev candidate.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: The composition changed after the first full-suite run and requires its own receipt.
Evidence: make evidence imported exit-0 make test && make build at Dev 1fa58cb.
Impact: The task card distinguishes the verified HEAD from previous component and browser snapshots.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=d5428c5f05fc5f625e6232ab3156b17f13e14d6a.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Main added RDM acceptance coverage during the review and the task branch must include it.
Evidence: make evidence imported the successful task-sync receipt against d5428c5.
Impact: The merge preserved all U3 component pins and added the new target-branch integration script.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: Review found three code-level failures in approval phrasing, checkpoint counting and evaluator identity.
Evidence: Each targeted regression was RED then GREEN; Backend full Go, race and live fixture checks passed at 9126dae.
Impact: The Dev composition now includes the corrected Backend while real-model QA remains NOT_RUN.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2, independent final review
Why: The final zero-paid candidate needs the independent review disposition and fresh replay receipts in one composition.
Evidence: Browser receipt c4a2240e and PostgreSQL receipt 7291fe2b were imported by make evidence; Backend RED-to-GREEN fixes passed.
Impact: The task card and Documents report leave real-model validation NOT_RUN and merge gated.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: The fixed candidate must be checked against current main before review and CI.
Evidence: make evidence imported the exit-0 task-sync receipt against d5428c5.
Impact: No new component conflict was found; the review fixes remain pinned.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: The final zero-paid composition changed after independent review fixes.
Evidence: make evidence imported exit-0 make test && make build at Dev c4a718f with all component pins fixed.
Impact: The task card carries the exact test receipt; model-quality acceptance remains NOT_RUN.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
Why: The task card still described verification as in progress after the fixed candidate passed local checks.
Evidence: Reviewed composition receipt 7111af35, browser receipt c4a2240e and PostgreSQL receipt 7291fe2b are tool-imported SELF records.
Impact: Reviewers see accurate code readiness without treating local evidence as GATE or model acceptance.
Refs: U3 quality revision r0.2
weichen
changed title from [WIP] Show source-backed work progress in the existing three-pane workspace to [WIP] Deliver source-backed U2/U3 progress in the three-pane workspace2026-10-13 11:03:12 +00:00
Why: A future authorized sample needs its own one-shot label rather than reusing exhausted approvals.
Evidence: Guarded label tests were RED then GREEN; full Backend Go suite passed at d89c72e.
Impact: No paid model request is triggered; the candidate SHA changes and requires fresh exact-head CI.
Refs: U3 quality implementation plan r0.2, Task 6 preparation
Why: The distinct one-shot evaluation gate changed the Backend and Dev SHAs.
Evidence: make evidence imported exit-0 make test && make build at 894312f; Backend platform run 2940 passed at d89c72e.
Impact: The candidate remains draft and the paid A01 quality gate remains NOT_RUN.
Refs: U3 quality implementation plan r0.2, Task 6 preparation
Why: The authorized r0.2 trial had an unsupported stage inference, while replay exposed two separate diagnostic-control defects.
Evidence: Exact paid-run files and tool-imported receipts, independent REPLAY, and Backend RED-to-GREEN/full-suite checks.
Impact: U3 quality remains FAIL; the new Backend code has no paid-model acceptance and all PRs stay draft.
Refs: U3 quality implementation plan r0.2, Task 6
Why: An in-flight Documents edit correctly blocked build after the first post-sample test phase.
Evidence: Full exit-2 SELF receipt imported by make evidence; Documents report committed at 4971d0d with archive hashes.
Impact: The candidate now has a clean composition for a serial full rerun; model-quality FAIL is unchanged.
Refs: U3 r0.2 A01 assessment
Why: The first rerun stopped at the dirty-worktree guard while the serial rerun completed both test and build.
Evidence: make evidence imported exit-0 receipt 3ea47713 at Dev f8c7650; original exit-2 receipt remains.
Impact: The failed model quality decision is unchanged and current-head GATE remains pending.
Refs: U3 r0.2 A01 assessment
Why: The failed A01 needs a documented next design while the six PRs remain draft and unmerged.
Evidence: Independent semantic FAIL and the committed r0.3 spec with resolved links and explicit no-paid/no-implementation boundary.
Impact: Project entry and task card point to a pending design review; no new semantic behavior is enabled.
Refs: U3 r0.2 A01 assessment, r0.3 design
Why: The r0.2 real-model sample failed semantic quality, and the user approved the r0.3 written design for detailed planning.
Evidence: Prior r0.2 A01 report and imported SELF receipts remain in the task card; plan self-review and git diff --cached --check passed.
Impact: Pin Documents f608ae5 and update planning state; implementation and paid model trials remain gated.
Refs: Documents PR #95; Dev PR #512
Why: The reviewable plan needs a fixed Dev combination and complete tool-written verification receipt.
Evidence: make test && make build exit 0 on Dev 73bb827; SELF receipt 02567630b483ace3feaa12e227d50de63205d76fe76e6ac266085dbda50b7535 imported by make evidence.
Impact: Task evidence only; r0.3 semantic implementation and paid quality remain NOT_RUN.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Documents PR #95
Why: The approved r0.3 plan must run against the current project member and IAM mainline.
Evidence: First task-sync conflict receipt was imported; Backend full Go tests and Frontend test/build passed after resolving component interactions; git diff --cached --check passed.
Impact: Combine current main with the existing U3 draft, preserving both planning entries and the Backend private project event proof transaction.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend PR #193; Frontend PR #79; Documents PR #95
Why: The user approved zero-paid implementation after the written plan review, and the first main sync required component conflict resolution.
Evidence: Tool-imported first-sync failure and resolved-sync SELF receipts; Backend full Go and Frontend test/build results are recorded as local checks.
Impact: Pin Documents approval status and preserve the exact merge/sync trail; paid A01 remains unauthorized.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Documents PR #95
Why: The approved r0.3 candidate now has Core evidence types, Backend normalization and matching generated frontend/UI contracts.
Evidence: Core and Backend full Go suites, selected live-tag fake-provider tests, UI 165 tests/typecheck, Frontend 265 tests/build and recursive worktree verification passed locally; final Dev combination follows on this exact commit.
Impact: Advance the five component gitlinks in the existing draft; no paid model call, merge or deployment.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Core #31; Backend #193; Frontend #79; UI #51; Documents #95
Why: The zero-paid candidate needs an auditable source, database and prompt-size record before exact-head combination testing.
Evidence: Tool-imported isolated PostgreSQL and offline size receipts; Component tests are identified as local SELF in the task card.
Impact: Evidence and state text only; paid A01 remains NOT_RUN.
Refs: Dev PR #512; r0.3 evidence implementation plan Task 4
Why: The first exact Dev r0.3 combination failed the Frontend unused-export ratchet despite passing runtime tests.
Evidence: The failed SELF receipt is imported into the task card; regenerated Frontend knip 51 <= 52, UI knip 61 <= 61 and component build/typechecks pass.
Impact: Pin Core, Backend, Frontend and UI corrections without changing the evidence wire shape; full Dev combination follows on this HEAD.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Core #31; Backend #193; Frontend #79; UI #51
Why: The real HTTP gate now checks the host-generated pending relationship alongside source recovery and reading focus.
Evidence: Fixed Dev combination on f7e55c3 passed with imported SELF receipt; the new browser assertion failed on the old fixture, then Backend selected fake-stream tests passed.
Impact: Update test-only Backend/Frontend components and preserve the first browser RED; new exact-head browser and combination gates follow.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend #193; Frontend #79
Why: The review candidate needs fixed browser results and a durable validation report.
Evidence: Tool-imported two-pass real HTTP fake-stream Playwright receipt on Dev b10a218; owned mechanism and preview processes were stopped.
Impact: Pin Documents 21fbc9d and record mechanism PASS separately from still-unrun real-model quality.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Documents PR #95
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=415f9ac58ece9d9b63bd9b3fea39978bb847fcce.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: The approved candidate must record the latest authoritative main before independent review.
Evidence: make task-sync exit 0 with sync_base 415f9ac; full SELF receipt imported by make evidence.
Impact: Task evidence only; source components unchanged and current-head combination remains to be run.
Refs: Dev PR #512; r0.3 evidence implementation plan Task 4
Why: Independent review found three unsupported-claim paths in the prior candidate.
Evidence: Each source-context, scope and unstructured-placement counterexample failed before repair; Backend full Go and selected fake-stream tests passed after.
Impact: Advance Backend 9019f90 and preserve the failed review plus exact prior combination receipt; revalidation follows on the new SHA.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend PR #193; r0.3 review P1 findings
Why: The third independent review found incomplete sentence, revised count and same-source scope shortcuts.
Evidence: New counterexamples failed before Backend 3f0141d and passed after; exact prior review failures and mechanisms remain recorded in Documents 53b1abd.
Impact: Advance Backend and Documents draft pins; paid model quality remains NOT_RUN.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend PR #193; Documents PR #95
Why: Independent re-review found an unchecked extra direct source and an unfamiliar-unit count revision.
Evidence: Both counterexamples failed before Backend badf80d and passed after; prior PostgreSQL receipt belongs to 3f0141d and is preserved separately.
Impact: Advance the zero-paid Backend candidate; repeat database, browser and exact-head combination validation on this SHA.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend PR #193; r0.3 review findings
Why: Independent review found an unproven approval statement hidden before a caution word.
Evidence: The new counterexample failed before Backend 5f53f80; earlier PostgreSQL receipt and review findings remain tied to their original SHAs.
Impact: Advance the zero-paid v10 material candidate; full exact-head validation and independent re-review remain pending.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend PR #193; r0.3 review findings
Why: The final zero-paid candidate has independent code review and task-owned database/browser results at fixed SHAs.
Evidence: Imported PostgreSQL and HTTP Playwright SELF receipts; reviewer independently replayed Backend 5f53f80 and found no remaining Critical/Important.
Impact: Pin Documents b776fe1 and record code mechanism PASS separately from model quality NOT_RUN; no paid call or merge.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Documents PR #95
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=57bcb17ea212a531186b6e21617a7f3bea65a791.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: The latest authoritative main must be included before fixing the final validation object.
Evidence: make task-sync exit 0 at sync_base 57bcb17, complete SELF receipt imported by make evidence; component gitlinks did not change.
Impact: Task record only; exact-head Dev combination and platform checks remain pending.
Refs: Dev PR #512; r0.3 plan Task 4
Why: The separately gated A01 trial needs a unique label and raw result file while preserving the consumed r0.2 sample.
Evidence: Backend 5f83454 label/output tests and prior Dev 6f91ca9 combination receipt are recorded with their exact SHAs; new exact-head validation follows.
Impact: Zero-paid evaluator code and report pin only; no provider request, merge or deployment.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Backend #193; Documents #95
Why: The one-shot trial candidate must be tied to the current authoritative main before its exact combination and CI gates.
Evidence: make task-sync exit 0, sync_base 57bcb17, changed 0; complete SELF receipt imported by make evidence.
Impact: Task record only; no paid trial authorization or provider call.
Refs: Dev PR #512; r0.3 plan Task 5
Why: The approved implementation and mechanism validation are complete, while the real-model quality gate remains unrun.
Evidence: Dev ef6f650 make test/build exit 0 with imported SELF receipt; Backend 5f53f80 independent code replay and v10 PostgreSQL/HTTP receipts are linked in the card.
Impact: Update task/project status for human stage-6 review; no provider request, merge or deployment.
Refs: Dev PR #512; Documents PR #95
weichen
changed title from [WIP] Deliver source-backed U2/U3 progress in the three-pane workspace to [WIP] Deliver progressive U2/U3 work with evidence-backed judgments2026-10-13 18:20:38 +00:00
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=add097d06137c4912a4ed9279e98ca353e4e4cf1.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: allow the registered task worktree to pass the current resume validator.
Evidence: precheck READY at 3de8793; registered path, branch, and R0 were verified against Git.
Impact: task-card metadata only; no product code or component pointer changes.
Refs: .task/feature-fast-slow-u2-u3-plan.md
Why: preserve the failed A01 outcome and an actionable design for reliable staged material work.
Evidence: Documents links and diff checks pass; Dev make test passed with the staged Documents gitlink; original A01 and offline diagnostic receipts remain SELF.
Impact: documentation, task-card evidence and Documents pin only; no product behavior or model budget change.
Refs: modules/documents/docs/proposals/2026-10-14-fast-slow-u3-r04-reliable-first-checkpoint-design.md; .task/feature-fast-slow-u2-u3-plan.md
Why: preserve the approved design decision and a staged, verifiable plan before code work.
Evidence: six tasks and thirty steps self-reviewed; local links pass; make test passed with Documents 276f885 staged, receipt imported as SELF.
Impact: documentation, task card and Documents gitlink only; no model calls or production behavior changes.
Refs: modules/documents/docs/proposals/2026-10-14-fast-slow-u3-r04-reliable-first-checkpoint-implementation-plan.md; .task/feature-fast-slow-u2-u3-plan.md
Why: Fix the exact Agent-Native consumer chain and publish the r0.4 Backend and browser test candidate as a reviewable Dev combination.
Evidence: Strict pin preflight, component tests, isolated PostgreSQL, six HTTP/Playwright cases, and make build passed. The full local make test was interrupted by an unrelated concurrent fixed-port collision; this failure and prior pin failures remain in the task card. Exact-HEAD CI and independent review remain pending.
Impact: Dev gitlinks and task evidence only; no paid model call or deployment.
Refs: U3 r0.4 implementation plan; Agent-Native PR #46; Agent-Squad PR #53; Backend PR #193; Frontend PR #79
Why: Incorporate the accepted proposal-status and merge-queue policy updates before U3 review.
Evidence: The Documents branch merged origin/main without overlapping content; Dev has no remaining unmerged paths. Strict pins and full combination will be revalidated at this head.
Impact: Documents gitlink and unrelated mainline task/policy files; U3 runtime components unchanged.
Refs: U3 r0.4 Task 6 review synchronization
Why: Close the independent review blockers and keep Dev, Backend, Agent-Squad and Agent-Native on one exact stream/runtime combination.
Evidence: Review issues reproduced RED then passed; component suites and six HTTP/Playwright cases passed. The staged Dev composition passed make test && make build with 340 governance tests and strict pins; full original receipts are in the task card. Current committed-head CI and review closure remain pending.
Impact: Component gitlinks and task evidence only; no paid A01 or deployment.
Refs: U3 r0.4 Task 6; Agent-Native PR #46; Agent-Squad PR #53; Backend PR #193; Frontend PR #79
Why: Incorporate the accepted RDM audit export and its Frontend component while retaining U3 browser coverage.
Evidence: Frontend main merged without textual conflicts, 269 unit tests and build passed. Dev composition, task-owned browser, and current-head CI will be revalidated.
Impact: Frontend gitlink and unrelated mainline RDM export files; no U3 contract change.
Refs: U3 r0.4 Task 6 final review synchronization
Why: Preserve the latest Frontend mainline export controls and the corrected batched-notice browser assertion in the U3 candidate.
Evidence: Frontend 269 unit tests/build and six task-owned HTTP/Playwright scenarios passed after merge; required Dev sync returned changed=0 at d852c15. Earlier failed sync and browser receipts are retained.
Impact: Frontend gitlink and task evidence only; current-head full Dev CI, PostgreSQL replay and review closure remain pending.
Refs: U3 r0.4 Task 6; Frontend PR #79
Why: Both supported tool finish reasons must fail closed when no call was collected; the Dev composition pins that exact Agent-Native revision through Agent-Squad and Backend.
Evidence: The function_call regression failed before the fix and passed afterward. Agent-Native, Agent-Squad and Backend full vet/test suites, strict Dev pins, and task-owned PostgreSQL/browser checks passed at their recorded versions. Current Dev HEAD CI and final independent replay remain pending.
Impact: Component gitlinks and task evidence only; no paid model call or deployment.
Refs: U3 r0.4 review Important 2; Agent-Native PR #46; Agent-Squad PR #53; Backend PR #193
weichen
changed title from [WIP] Deliver progressive U2/U3 work with evidence-backed judgments to [WIP] Deliver progressive U2/U3 work with reliable sourced checkpoints2026-10-14 04:16:58 +00:00
Why: Preserve the accepted U7 account transaction integration and pin the Backend merge that retains U3 checkpoint behavior.
Evidence: Backend merged main without text conflicts; full Go vet/test and zero-paid live-tag evaluation checks passed. Dev combination and current-head CI will be revalidated.
Impact: Mainline U7 docs/task records and Backend gitlink; no U3 public-contract or model-budget change.
Refs: U3 r0.4 resource-preparation sync; Dev main 05b997b
Why: Preserve the user-approved stage-6 conclusion at the reviewed Dev SHA and distinguish it from the newly synchronized U7-containing candidate.
Evidence: Readiness precheck and task-resume passed after Backend/Dev main merges; Backend vet/full Go/live-tag checks and Dev strict pins passed. Failed precheck/sync receipts remain attached. New exact-head combination/CI are still required.
Impact: Task record only; no paid model authorization, merge or deployment.
Refs: U3 r0.4 stage-6 review; Dev PR #512
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=4f84c2e1630cd0311643529fae1c3a99f1dd5d64.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Record the separate one-time A01 resource authorization and fix the exact Backend revision with its own guarded label and output name.
Evidence: The selector tests failed before the change and passed afterward. Full Backend vet/Go and selected zero-paid live-tag suites, Dev strict pins and build passed; full new-head CI and preflight are required before any paid call.
Impact: Evaluation-only Backend gitlink and task evidence. No provider request, merge or deployment.
Refs: U3 r0.4 stage-6 conclusion and one-time A01 resource proposal; Backend PR #193
Why: The authorized real-model sample failed without checkpoints or a final result, and failed-child Usage was underreported in the original candidate.
Evidence: Independent A01 assessment 2ac373ed; Backend accounting review d53cc969; SELF combination receipt /tmp/fast-slow-u3-r04-20261014/usage-fix-final-dev-combo.json and Backend GATE run 3079.
Impact: Keep eight draft PRs and the original sample intact; pin Backend 0637547 and Documents c53662a while marking stage 7, merge, and deployment not run.
Refs: U3 r0.4 implementation plan; task feature-fast-slow-u2-u3-plan
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=427e9faf47641a427c5f2173244f65b8867c4500.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: The single r0.4 A01 failed both staged-result and fast-feedback quality; the user approved writing a conservative next design.
Evidence: Documents 0d473fe link check and diff check; Dev staged-gitlink make test exit 0 through make evidence in the task card. The prior paid sample and independent assessment remain unchanged.
Impact: Add only design, navigation, and task traceability. Product behavior, paid model allowance, merge, and deployment remain unapproved.
Refs: U3 r0.5 design; Dev PR #512; Documents PR #95
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=d40579ed7fe3bbca68d3c6fcd1bce6707688d59e.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: The authoritative main advanced with facts and task-governance changes before the written design review.
Evidence: make task-sync SELF receipt /tmp/fast-slow-u3-r05-design-review-sync.json; the post-sync make test completed exit 0 and its full evidence output is in the task card.
Impact: Preserve the unchanged Documents 0d473fe design pin while recording the new Dev base and the need for exact-head CI. No product code or paid model call changed.
Refs: U3 r0.5 design; Dev PR #512; Documents PR #95
Why: The user approved the r0.5 written design for detailed planning; the resulting plan must be traceable from the Dev task and project entry.
Evidence: Documents 25a561b passed link and diff checks; staged Dev make test completed exit 0 through make evidence in the task card.
Impact: Pin plan and approval status only. Product code, new paid model calls, merge, and deployment remain not run.
Refs: U3 r0.5 plan; Documents PR #95; Dev PR #512
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=d23fb4363dcc0a206e71e47f9cd23a644c7e1c70.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Material uploads need an immediate truthful reply while incomplete tool streams remain blocked and diagnosable.
Evidence: Dev task card records ten browser scenarios, isolated PG/Redis, component suites, and composed test/build; one later governance test replay hit a concurrent fixed-port collision and remains under diagnosis.
Impact: Pins Native, Squad, Backend, Frontend, and Documents; no paid model request or merge.
Refs: U3 r0.5 implementation plan and feature-fast-slow-u2-u3-plan task card
Why: Keep the approved DHF documentation and task archival while retaining the U3 implementation.
Evidence: Documents main merged into the feature branch; recursive gitlinks and staged diff inspected.
Impact: Resolves only the Documents gitlink conflict and carries current main metadata.
Refs: U3 r0.5 implementation plan Task 5
Why: The composed candidate must include the bounded evaluation record and queued/failure browser coverage.
Evidence: Backend and Frontend RED/GREEN receipts and full component suites.
Impact: Updates only Backend and Frontend gitlinks; final browser and composed gates follow.
Refs: U3 r0.5 independent review findings
Why: The task card and Documents pin must identify the fixed candidate and the independent review boundary.
Evidence: Tool-imported precheck, sync, tests, twelve-browser and isolated PG receipts; staged recursive pins passed.
Impact: Advances the Documents gitlink and task record; real model quality remains NOT_RUN.
Refs: U3 r0.5 implementation plan Task 5
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=c8eead49c5e68b2e295927c0e82cc57bcb04bad5.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Completion evidence must stay tool-written in the task card before final head validation.
Evidence: Imported successful task-sync, 344-test governance, full make test and build receipts.
Impact: Task record only; component pins and product behavior are unchanged.
Refs: U3 r0.5 implementation plan Task 5
Why: Keep the new OOXML registration gate and task record while retaining U3 fixes.
Evidence: Backend merged main 607c38d cleanly; full Go vet/test and selected zero-paid live-tag tests passed at d39e77c.
Impact: Updates the Backend gitlink and unrelated main task metadata; browser and composed checks follow.
Refs: U3 r0.5 implementation plan Task 5
Why: The task record must carry exact component, browser, PG, and combination results after main updates.
Evidence: Imported successful sync, twelve-browser, isolated PG, and make test/build receipts; Backend run3127.
Impact: Task record only; model quality remains NOT_RUN and PRs stay draft.
Refs: U3 r0.5 implementation plan Task 5
Why: include the current integration baseline before verification.
Evidence: fetched origin/main=3538d40f45ad5a7c779426eb3322f79751db380c.
Impact: integrate upstream changes without rewriting task history.
Refs: task-sync
Why: Stage-6 review must identify the current main base and final tool-written sync receipt.
Evidence: make task-sync at main 3538d40, recursive pins, and independent closure replay.
Impact: Task record only; all eight component pins remain unchanged.
Refs: U3 r0.5 implementation plan Task 5
Why: Preserve the merged DHF progress note and task-card archive before writing the U3 resource proposal.
Evidence: Documents branch merged current main without conflict; Core and UI feature pins contain main pins; staged diff checked.
Impact: Updates only Documents gitlink and unrelated task archival.
Refs: U3 r0.5 stage-6 decision and resource preparation
Why: Human stage-six approval permits a separate resource decision but does not authorize paid requests.
Evidence: Approved Dev 822a92c review, stage-six decision record, synchronized Documents pin, and make test SELF receipt.
Impact: Adds a one-request diagnostic proposal reference; all PRs stay draft and model quality stays NOT_RUN.
Refs: U3 r0.5 implementation plan Task 5
Why: Preserve the one-shot diagnostic, consumed authorization, and safe failure boundary in the task record.
Evidence: SELF receipt 6b013965; independent assessment f35d1c17; make test-pins and make test exit 0.
Impact: Documentation and Documents pin only; no model, tool, UI, or runtime behavior changes.
Refs: Agent-System-Documents PR #95; Agent-System-Dev PR #512
Why: Present the evidence-first response to an incomplete MiniMax tool stream for stage-four review.
Evidence: approved design direction; Documents 54d39ef; SELF make test-pins and make test exit 0.
Impact: Documentation and Documents pin only; no runtime, tool-gate, model-resource, or UI change.
Refs: Agent-System-Documents PR #95; Agent-System-Dev PR #512
Why: The previous session staged the stage 4 approval of the r0.6 transport design and its precheck receipt without committing them.
Evidence: Card-only change; the precheck receipt was written by make evidence on 2026-10-14.
Impact: Task card only; PROJECT.md and the documents pointer are refreshed during the main sync.
Refs: .task/feature-fast-slow-u2-u3-plan.md
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: The reverse sync rebuilds the branch from main, so the branch-only task card must be carried explicitly.
Evidence: Card content is byte-identical to origin/feature/fast-slow-u2-u3-plan at 08f08e8.
Impact: Task card only.
Refs: .task/feature-fast-slow-u2-u3-plan.md
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: Tasks 1-3 landed, every component was synced with main, and the agent-intent pin chain had to be aligned for make test-pins.
Evidence: make test-pins on Dev d5d87cb returned "pins ok" (SELF receipt imported by make evidence).
Impact: Task card only.
Refs: .task/feature-fast-slow-u2-u3-plan.md
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: The task-owned mechanism instance replay of work-checkpoints.playwright.ts ran on Dev e790fed after the main sync.
Evidence: 6 passed, 6 failed (SELF receipt imported by make evidence); failures need sourced findings and grounded choices that the merged durable work cards no longer render.
Impact: Task card only; the result is recorded as a failure pending a decision.
Refs: .task/feature-fast-slow-u2-u3-plan.md
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: The local make test && make build run must be kept even though it failed.
Evidence: SELF receipt shows one governance failure (test_close_self_child_keeps_initiative_target_from_archive) that also reproduces on the main checkout; exact-HEAD CI test, test-pg and svc-realcombo passed for e790fed.
Impact: Task card only.
Refs: .task/feature-fast-slow-u2-u3-plan.md
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: Main's durable work cards hid the trusted task view, so UI #51 and Frontend #79 were repaired and the mechanism replay rerun.
Evidence: Playwright 12 passed on Dev 97f363a against a verified task-owned mechanism instance (SELF receipt imported by make evidence).
Impact: Task card only.
Refs: .task/feature-fast-slow-u2-u3-plan.md
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: The independent r0.6 review requested changes; two code findings are fixed and the third needs a user decision.
Evidence: make test-pins pins ok and mechanism Playwright 12/12 on the task-owned instance (SELF receipts imported by make evidence).
Impact: Task card only; pins UI fadabce, Backend f24a610 and Frontend 6f8e7ec were moved in the preceding transport commit.
Refs: Dev #512, UI #51, Backend #193, Frontend #79
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: Plan Task 4 Step 7 needs the stage 6 mapping and the open user decisions recorded with the candidate.
Evidence: Fix re-review by a fresh independent session approved with REPLAY runs; mapping lives in Documents bf12f2d.
Impact: Task card only; the preceding transport commit pins modules/documents to bf12f2d.
Refs: Dev #512, Documents #95
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: The user passed stage 6 conditionally on CI, accepted the work-card change and deferred the resource proposal.
Evidence: User decision in the delivery session on 2026-10-19; no new commands.
Impact: Task card only.
Refs: Dev #512
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: Stage 6 passed on condition that the new HEADs' CI succeeded; Gitea recovered and the gates are now verified.
Evidence: ci_wait CI_SUCCESS for UI fadabce, Backend f24a610, Frontend 6f8e7ec and Dev b1d40f6 (runs linked in the card).
Impact: Task card only.
Refs: Dev #512, UI #51, Backend #193, Frontend #79
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: The user approved stage 1 of the r0.6 resource proposal; the single paid probe has run.
Evidence: Private receipt 21bd00d0 (HTTP 200, tool_calls, clean_eof over http2_stream, length unknown, no [DONE], 472 tokens, zero tools); preflights 24/24 and 25/25 PASS (SELF); Dev 9366891 CI run 4135 (GATE); author and independent assessments agree INCONCLUSIVE.
Impact: Task card only; A01 is not eligible and the eight PRs stay drafts.
Refs: Documents #95, Dev #512
Why: The user chose partial close after the r0.6 probe was INCONCLUSIVE.
Evidence: Component PRs merged at exact heads with CI success; Dev synced to main 198d189 with tree 062f5ac; make test-pins ok (SELF).
Impact: Task card only.
Refs: Dev #512, merge queue #518
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: Merge gate requires the task-sync evidence in the card.
Evidence: make task-sync changed=0 against main 198d189 (SELF, receipt sha256 241bf174).
Impact: Task card only.
Refs: Dev #512
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: task-close requires the standard status field.
Evidence: Header now carries PR and status fields.
Impact: Task card only.
Refs: Dev #512
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Why: close the task card inside its own PR so landing it needs no post-merge backfill or separate close PR.
Evidence: .task/feature-fast-slow-u2-u3-plan.md -> .task/archive/feature-fast-slow-u2-u3-plan.md; status 已完成（合入前闭合）; PR #512https://git-home.u1680832.nyat.app:30319/weichen/Agent-System-Dev/pulls/512.
Impact: task metadata only; the card is archived within PR #512 and lands with its merge commit.
Refs: task.sh close --self
Why: CI run 4176 failed because Dev main pinned unmerged super-admin component commits.
Evidence: Backend #217 and Frontend #112 merged with CI success; make test-pins ok (SELF).
Impact: Task card only.
Refs: Dev #512, Backend #217, Frontend #112, merge queue #518
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Summary
The progressive U2/U3 candidate shows a trustworthy host acknowledgement immediately after material intake and keeps sourced findings on the same task card. Its r0.5 tool-stream gate rejects calls when
[DONE]is absent. The authorized one-shot MiniMax probe returnedtool_callsand Usage 513 but no observed[DONE], so no tool was released or executed. The new r0.6 design proposes content-free transport evidence; it is awaiting written stage-4 review and changes no runtime behavior.The task card is the canonical status and evidence record. r0.4 A01 remains FAIL, r0.5 real A01 remains
NOT_RUN; all eight PRs stay drafts, with no merge or deployment.Evidence
incomplete_terminal. Independent assessment:/home/weichen/.local/share/agent-system-evidence/fast-slow-u3-r05-terminal-20261014/probe-result-independent-assessment.md(SHA-256f35d1c17).make test-pinsandmake testlocally (SELF). Exact-head CI run 3158 passed alltest,test-pg, andsvc-realcombojobs and steps for Dev89125b8(GATE).Merge Danger
Door: Two-way. Blast Radius: Runtime. The change spans several repositories and the UI. Do not merge until the written r0.6 design and plan are approved, its needed behavior is implemented and validated, a separately authorized real A01 quality gate passes, and the final exact HEAD satisfies review and CI.
[WIP] Show source-backed work progress in the existing three-pane workspaceto [WIP] Deliver source-backed U2/U3 progress in the three-pane workspace[WIP] Deliver source-backed U2/U3 progress in the three-pane workspaceto [WIP] Deliver progressive U2/U3 work with evidence-backed judgments[WIP] Deliver progressive U2/U3 work with evidence-backed judgmentsto [WIP] Deliver progressive U2/U3 work with reliable sourced checkpointsDev main 的最终同步、完整 PR CI 与智能体合入目前按唯一调度记录 #518协调；r2 第二轮仍
pending-activation / waiting。最近 #551 在另一已领取窗口内推进 main，该窗口已失效并释放，已在 #518 对账。本 PR 如要恢复到最终交付，请实际工作区 owner 先在 #518 登记当前 PR/head、原任务授权与阶段结论、依赖/组件、活动写者和就绪时间，再由协调者确认目标窗口；等待期间无需为追 main 反复跑最终 CI。此评论只通知共享目标规则，不接管 #512、不批准其实现或合入，也不修改现有平台保护。
e790fed